ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 46

Our Oil Addiction Is About to Make Life a Lot Nastier

The great age of renewable energy is in our distant future. Before then, energy prices will rise, environmental perils will multiply and conflict will grow. Buckle your seatbelts.
September 24, 2009  |  
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

The debate rages over whether we have already reached the point of peak world oil output or will not do so until at least the next decade. There can, however, be little doubt of one thing: we are moving from an era in which oil was the world's principal energy source to one in which petroleum alternatives -- especially renewable supplies derived from the sun, wind, and waves -- will provide an ever larger share of our total supply. But buckle your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy ride under Xtreme conditions.

It would, of course, be ideal if the shift from dwindling oil to its climate-friendly successors were to happen smoothly via a mammoth, well-coordinated, interlaced system of wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and other renewable energy installations. Unfortunately, this is unlikely to occur. Instead, we will surely first pass through an era characterized by excessive reliance on oil's final, least attractive reserves along with coal, heavily polluting "unconventional" hydrocarbons like Canadian oil sands, and other unappealing fuel choices.

There can be no question that Barack Obama and many members of Congress would like to accelerate a shift from oil dependency to non-polluting alternatives. As the president said in January, "We will commit ourselves to steady, focused, pragmatic pursuit of an America that is free from our [oil] dependence and empowered by a new energy economy that puts millions of our citizens to work." Indeed, the $787 billion economic stimulus package he signed in February provided $11 billion to modernize the nation's electrical grid, $14 billion in tax incentives to businesses to invest in renewable energy, $6 billion to states for energy efficiency initiatives, and billions more directed to research on renewable sources of energy. More of the same can be expected if a sweeping climate bill is passed by Congress. The version of the bill recently passed by the House of Representatives, for example, mandates that 20% of U.S. electrical production be supplied by renewable energy by 2020.

But here's the bad news: even if all these initiatives were to pass, and more like them many times over, it would still take decades for this country to substantially reduce its dependence on oil and other non-renewable, polluting fuels. So great is our demand for energy, and so well-entrenched the existing systems for delivering the fuels we consume, that (barring a staggering surprise) we will remain for years to come in a no-man's-land between the Petroleum Age and an age that will see the great flowering of renewable energy. Think of this interim period as -- to give it a label -- the Era of Xtreme Energy, and in just about every sense imaginable from pricing to climate change, it is bound to be an ugly time.

An Oil Field as Deep as Mt. Everest Is High

Don't be fooled by the fact that this grim new era will surely witness the arrival of many more wind turbines, solar arrays, and hybrid vehicles. Most new buildings will perhaps come equipped with solar panels, and more light-rail systems will be built. Despite all this, however, our civilization is likely to remain remarkably dependent on oil-fueled cars, trucks, ships, and planes for most transportation purposes, as well as on coal for electricity generation. Much of the existing infrastructure for producing and distributing our energy supply will also remain intact, even as many existing sources of oil, coal, and natural gas become exhausted, forcing us to rely on previously untouched, far more undesirable (and often far less accessible) sources of these fuels.

Some indication of the likely fuel mix in this new era can be seen in the most recent projections of the Department of Energy (DoE) on future U.S. energy consumption. According to the department's Annual Energy Outlook for 2009, the United States will consume an estimated 114 quadrillion British thermal units (BTUs) of energy in 2030, of which 37% will be supplied by oil and other petroleum liquids, 23% by coal, 22% by natural gas, 8% by nuclear power, 3% by hydropower, and only 7% by wind, solar, biomass, and other renewable sources.

Clearly, this does not yet suggest a dramatic shift away from oil and other fossil fuels. On the basis of current trends, the DoE also predicts that even two decades from now, in 2030, oil, natural gas, and coal will still make up 82% of America's primary energy supply, only two percentage points less than in 2009. (It is of course conceivable that a dramatic shift in national and international priorities will lead to a greater increase in renewable energy in the next two decades, but at this point that remains a dim hope rather than a sure thing.)

While fossil fuels will remain dominant in 2030, the nature of these fuels, and the ways in which we acquire them, will undergo profound change. Today, most of our oil and natural gas come from "conventional" sources of supply: large underground reservoirs found mainly in relatively accessible sites on land or in shallow coastal areas. These are the reserves that can be easily exploited using familiar technology, most notably modern versions of the towering oil rigs made famous most recently in the 2007 film There Will Be Blood.


Michael T. Klare is a professor of peace and world security studies at Hampshire College in Amherst, Mass., and the author of Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America's Growing Petroleum Dependency.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: energy, petroleum, peak oil


Comments are closed-

Just as finite energy resources will become more
Posted by: drfun on Sep 24, 2009 1:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
difficult and costly, the BRIC countries developing western appetites of consumerism will devour them, along with their Euro/American counterparts present lifestyles.

Society is not preparing for the realization in the very near future of what is to happen to much of humanity living on the earth today. Blindly continuing towards the cliffs edge as if technology is going to solve these problems in due time.

I'm thankful of being on the downward slide in life, having chosen to see as much of the world as I have been afforded on what little $'s I've spent doing so. Leaving no prodigy to endure what is to happen. Pleased to have met many of the folks I have shared my finite minutes with and few regrets of decisions made.

I sold my car years ago, and thankful of the vast public transportation available to me where I live. Occupying less than 20m sq. and consuming less than 150 KWH of electricity per month, though my carbon sink is plane travel. Always one thing in the system to burst your eco-bubble.

Thankful I didn't get caught up in the "American Dream".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Watch out... Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

A Rosie Scenario Without a New Financial System ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 24, 2009 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the decline in supply and the rise in price at some point our economic system will fail. It is not a question of if but when.

Why? Because we rely on debt to produce our money through fractional reserve banking. All the "money" produced is borrowed money underwritten by debt.

Debt is a promise to pay in the future. It's payment, and the interest extracts from future earnings. With higher energy costs, lower supply, future production can only decrease.

When future production is seen to be stagnant or decreasing loans will become more costly as default rates soar. The "money" supply will fall precipitously bringing the economy down with it ... much as this current crisis is doing now.

Why do we have this problem? The mantra of growth at any cost. We need the growth to create more money.

There is only one solution ... The Government creates our money without debt. They spend it right into the system at such a ratio that it causes neither rampant inflation nor deflation. Should more money be needed it must be from taxes or borrowing ...

The crisis ? The complete control of the political system by banks who will never relinquish the greatest gift in the history of mankind. That is their monopoly on the creation of money ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This article is heavily flawed. We can end our dependence on oil in several ways.
Posted by: LStinson1988 on Sep 24, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Klare says that fossil fuels will be dominant even in 2030 but proves himself wrong when he says that it will be harder to find it by then. If supply goes down and/or prices go up, then demand will have to go down, not up. On the individual side and on general policies, it is possible to significantly lower dependence on oil. Ending the government subsidies for the oil giants and diverting them to technologies such as solar and wind power would help. Limiting funding for highway construction and maintenance and diverting the funding towards public transportation services such as buses and metro trains would significantly ease traffic congestion and reduce dependence on oil. We could also bring back the fuel efficient vehicles that used to do 50 mpg and higher into the market. Why is there a "free market" only for gas guzzlers but none for gas sippers ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Not so sure about "peak oil"
Posted by: leland61 on Sep 24, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just today I saw a headline that more oil reserves have been DISCOVERED than at anytime since 2000.

There is a great deal of oil that has a lid on the well head because of politics. There are billions of barrells just offshore from the west coast of Florida - and California - and many other places.

Iknow!! I know!!! Oil spills and all that. But the fact is that for now there is more than enough oil. The only reason that you are not paying about $1.67 @ gallon at the pump now is the inflated profits of the robber oil barons.

Not that we don't need alternatives - but the environmental cost of producing battery powered cars is at least as great as that for the oil to operate a really efficient gasoline or diesel auto.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are horribly misinformed Posted by: lynned2002
» RE: Not so sure about "peak oil" Posted by: newawakening

Comments are closed-

Yes, conflict is inevitable
Posted by: daw13 on Sep 24, 2009 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but not quite as suggested in this piece. More likely the conflict between global haves and have nots described by Orwell in 1984. The great danger for we the non-elite citizens of the world is our "leader's" pathological confidence in their ability to deal with too-many-people-not-enough-oil not through policies of conservation but through policies of extermination. Any of us who imagine they can pull this off, to our benefit as well as theirs, are as delusional as they are. So many people I meet, including well educated people, view the worst case scenario as one in which Western Empires successfully control the world in awful fashion; killing off millions, reducing democracies among their own citizens but keeping all alive and fairly comfortable. This is pure nonsense and the sooner we all wake up to that fact the sooner we begin to realize our human potential for survival in the face of probably the most serious challenge our species has faced to date.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Peak Oil just one of the problems
Posted by: marktab on Sep 24, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just want to suggest www.chrismartenson.com and his free crash course which is the best review of what humanity faces "soon", including Peak Oil, Over Ppulation, Species Extinction/The Environment, and a picture of today's Economic Reality. It is time to get serious if we want to do Right by those that follow us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What is so bumpy about switching energy sources?
Posted by: Todd McClintock on Sep 24, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Discover a source of energy.

2. Make profits from it and encourage spending.

3. Invent a crisis and raise the prices.

4. Repeat steps 1-3 !

Brilliant !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

No horses
Posted by: caple66wood on Sep 24, 2009 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article on the problems we, our children, and out grandchildren face from peak oil.

Note there is nothing here about the collapse of industrial civilization that the back-to-nature crowd is so enthusiastic about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Addiction........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 24, 2009 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Americans are addicted to OIL is a given! Big homes in the suburbs, big cars, consumerism run wild. And with so many people unwilling to look at the reality - whether "peak oil is 15 or 30 years away is not the question, the question is do we continue to kick the can of building alternatives to OIL now, or do we stick our collective heads in the sand and wait until our children and grandchildren are forced to do something or perish!

Do we look at this not just as a "lifestyle" change, but as a change to help "our environment" by reducing our carbon output, and allowing the Earth to rest just a bit from our intemperate insatiate appetites of more more more! Yes, it will require that we stop "subsidizing" (ok WELFARE) Agribusiness over real farmers, we may have to cut back on our driving distances to work, we may actually have to start hanging clothes on the line! But for all that we may loose, as a people in this nation - the gains that we get in return - less stress, more quality time with friends & family, time to walk and smell the flowers is priceless!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What distant future?
Posted by: inprov73 on Sep 24, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmmm ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Elite control of energy
Posted by: frankly1 on Sep 24, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you look back at the history the ruling elite they have always controlled the energy supply. When people burned wood for fuel they "owned" the forrest and you would be killed for taking a tree branch. When coal became the common fuel they owned the mines and the methods of transport of coal and so controlled the market and price. Now they control the oil and gas supply and the market and the governments that issue policy. They must maintain the status quo to keep the flow of wealth from the many to the tiny few. The technology now exists for ordinary people to detach themselves from central power generation so the elites must maintain the current system until they can control that technology and continue the exploitation at any cost both to the planet or humanity. If you think the sociopaths that control society would not destroy us to stay in control you need to read some history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good post! Posted by: Paul_C
» Excellent post Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

A Barrel of Water Will Soon Equal 200 Barrels of Oil!
Posted by: MarkGoldes on Sep 24, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The love affair with the automobile opens a surprising path to sharply reducing the need for fossil fuels.

Revolutionary new technology will make possible electric cars that need no recharge - as well as hybrid engines that might need to be fueled with only one gallon of water for each thousand miles of driving.

See the article: 4 Steps to Revive the Auto Industry and the Economy on the website: http://www.aesopinstitute.org

This outlines breakthroughs leading to cars and trucks that need no fossil fuel or recharge. Later, more advanced versions will become power plants when parked, wirelessly selling electricity to the local utility.

The science is not yet in the textbooks and will understandably be greeted with widespread skepticism. However, independent laboratory validation of one remarkable breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. It produced far more heat than can readily be explained by existing science, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The experiments can and should rapidly be repeated at national laboratories and other universities.

The Rowan validation began the process of proving that new technology can allow a barrel of water to replace 200 barrels of oil!

Radically new technologies will seductively let the love affair with vehicles change much of what is currently believed about energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

But for 'Merkuh's owning-class....
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 24, 2009 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We could have a massive "conversion" to non-dinojuice energy. It's a conscious choice to go slow, to do things after the fact to be short sighted, massive-profit oriented and all other manner of bullshit stoopid.

We are the innerant bein' led by the blind and stoopid.

By 2030 I predict massive "relocation" camps for anyone below owning class where they will serve as slave labor for the owning-ruling classes who will live in subcontractor secured, heavily fortified cities. And these will be powered by alternative energy. Oh, and the Jeebus people will run the breeding camps for the elites... it's their obsession afterall: controlling breeding stock (women) and sycophancying the "authorities."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A dystopian vision... Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

I beg your pardon
Posted by: oldhippy39 on Sep 24, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to my daughter & son-in-law who live
in south west Texas, right among the derricks,
there is enough oil under south west Texas to last us into the next century, not tomention all the oil that is off shore on both coasts.
Problem is, the major oil companies don't want to drill there. All that excess oil would drive
down the price of gas.
While I'm very much in favor of alternative energy, the technology is just beginning. Oil would be a handy stop-gap. I'd nothing better
than to see Exon-Mobile go out of business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's not the question Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: That's not the question Posted by: newawakening

Comments are closed-

Hempseed oil would curb the addiction.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 24, 2009 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah but who wants to listen ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I believe it is true...
Posted by: zigy on Sep 24, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the bulk of oil is used to produce plastic and for commercial transportation purposes. But it goes without saying that a significant portion is used (wasted) in private automobile transportation. We Americans have been profoundly brainwashed into believing self-mobility is irksome and impractical and that we therefor must have a car. I gave up my car fifteen years ago and I run to and from my job. It is a relaxing and refreshing commute of 25 minutes to an hour (depending upon how much mileage I want). I arrive at work feeling invigorated and at my apartment in the evening feeling refreshed. Humans evolved to run on the African savanna two millions years ago. Our survival depended upon it. There is archeological evidence that our ancestors could (and did when they needed to e.g. to track wounded game or find a water supply) run up to fourty miles a day. Makes modern marathoners look like "wimps" in comparison. Oh, and I'm no kid. I'm 52 and I easily run 70 to 80 miles a week.

My point is only this: We have been brainwashed by auto and oil to think human locomotion is unnatural, irksome, and impractical--don't buy it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This author ignores that oil wars have already started
Posted by: Jeff Greef on Sep 24, 2009 3:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author tells us:

None of these disputes has yet resulted in violent conflict

referring to geo-political posturing for oil territory. The wars in Iraq and Afganistan are both primarily oil related. 9/11 and the "war on terrorism" are false pretenses for conducting wars overseas to get control of oil territory. The countries north of Afganistan have oil and gas reserves, the only way to get it out NOT via Russia, or China, or Iran, is through Afganistan, where we built and continue to defend a pipeline. We are in Iraq for oil, no other reason.

We as Americans should not allow our government and industry to make war for oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

alternative fuels
Posted by: MIST on Sep 24, 2009 9:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one has mentioned a possible future fuel, Helium-3. In 50 years, if mankind survives disease and pollution, we may have the technology to mostly replace petrochemicals and coal for fuel. Getting helium-3 won't be easy. Drilling 7 miles below the ocean for oil seems simple by comparison to mining helium-3 and shipping it back from the lunar surface. But if we perfect fusion reactors, space elevators, and lunar shipments of sizable mass, it would take about one shuttle-bay size of cargo of helium-3 to supply all the power the U.S. needs for a year! I'd prefer to believe that mankind will grow up and live gently on the earth. But I don't. Yet new technologies lie on the horizon if we can endure that long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

MTS Converter
Posted by: peker on Sep 26, 2009 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though our oil addiction is about to make life a lot nastier,oil is the most important resources to our social.We can not stop development for environment pollution.Imeem downloader,
FLV Converter,
MTS Converter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Light Sources and Photobioreactors
Posted by: femtobeam on Sep 28, 2009 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer is algae and single cell biomass and photosynthetic bacteria in closed loop photobioreactors. This has already been developed in the US.

They produce huge amounts of biomass, toxin free. Uses include biofuel, it cleans up CO2 emissions, has a nice tradeoff with polluters to clean up their mess, use their waste, and it replenishes ocean fish, feeds animals and people, while providing a natural organic fertilizer source. The oil can be used directly for home heating oil or cooking. It will also take care of the rising tides, oxygenate the atmosphere and eliminate hunger and disease.

The reason it is being deliberately overlooked is because it is the disruptive technology that the oil, gas and coal companies do not want to happen. They do everything they can to prevent it from happening, including pretending like it still needs to be developed.

All that is required is funding for a manufacturing facility in the US instead of China, but jobs in America are too much for them to bear.

Entrepreneurs and scientists are in as much danger as outdoor cooks (witches) were during the dark ages. The inquisition is now out to destroy ideas and small business, stealing it and handing it over to the new master we owe our future to.

A planet consuming China.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Those thinking about long-term recovery,
Posted by: reg373 on Sep 29, 2009 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
know the enviroment will be a big winner in the conversion to biofuels & biopower --- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

not yet in the textbooks
Posted by: lukewatson on Oct 8, 2009 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The science is not yet in the textbooks and will understandably be greeted with widespread skepticism. However, independent laboratory validation of one remarkable breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. Buy specialist It produced far more heat than can readily be explained by existing science, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The experiments can and should rapidly be repeated at national laboratories and other universities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Just as finite energy resources will become more
Posted by: drfun on Sep 24, 2009 1:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
difficult and costly, the BRIC countries developing western appetites of consumerism will devour them, along with their Euro/American counterparts present lifestyles.

Society is not preparing for the realization in the very near future of what is to happen to much of humanity living on the earth today. Blindly continuing towards the cliffs edge as if technology is going to solve these problems in due time.

I'm thankful of being on the downward slide in life, having chosen to see as much of the world as I have been afforded on what little $'s I've spent doing so. Leaving no prodigy to endure what is to happen. Pleased to have met many of the folks I have shared my finite minutes with and few regrets of decisions made.

I sold my car years ago, and thankful of the vast public transportation available to me where I live. Occupying less than 20m sq. and consuming less than 150 KWH of electricity per month, though my carbon sink is plane travel. Always one thing in the system to burst your eco-bubble.

Thankful I didn't get caught up in the "American Dream".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Watch out... Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

A Rosie Scenario Without a New Financial System ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 24, 2009 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the decline in supply and the rise in price at some point our economic system will fail. It is not a question of if but when.

Why? Because we rely on debt to produce our money through fractional reserve banking. All the "money" produced is borrowed money underwritten by debt.

Debt is a promise to pay in the future. It's payment, and the interest extracts from future earnings. With higher energy costs, lower supply, future production can only decrease.

When future production is seen to be stagnant or decreasing loans will become more costly as default rates soar. The "money" supply will fall precipitously bringing the economy down with it ... much as this current crisis is doing now.

Why do we have this problem? The mantra of growth at any cost. We need the growth to create more money.

There is only one solution ... The Government creates our money without debt. They spend it right into the system at such a ratio that it causes neither rampant inflation nor deflation. Should more money be needed it must be from taxes or borrowing ...

The crisis ? The complete control of the political system by banks who will never relinquish the greatest gift in the history of mankind. That is their monopoly on the creation of money ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This article is heavily flawed. We can end our dependence on oil in several ways.
Posted by: LStinson1988 on Sep 24, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Klare says that fossil fuels will be dominant even in 2030 but proves himself wrong when he says that it will be harder to find it by then. If supply goes down and/or prices go up, then demand will have to go down, not up. On the individual side and on general policies, it is possible to significantly lower dependence on oil. Ending the government subsidies for the oil giants and diverting them to technologies such as solar and wind power would help. Limiting funding for highway construction and maintenance and diverting the funding towards public transportation services such as buses and metro trains would significantly ease traffic congestion and reduce dependence on oil. We could also bring back the fuel efficient vehicles that used to do 50 mpg and higher into the market. Why is there a "free market" only for gas guzzlers but none for gas sippers ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Not so sure about "peak oil"
Posted by: leland61 on Sep 24, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just today I saw a headline that more oil reserves have been DISCOVERED than at anytime since 2000.

There is a great deal of oil that has a lid on the well head because of politics. There are billions of barrells just offshore from the west coast of Florida - and California - and many other places.

Iknow!! I know!!! Oil spills and all that. But the fact is that for now there is more than enough oil. The only reason that you are not paying about $1.67 @ gallon at the pump now is the inflated profits of the robber oil barons.

Not that we don't need alternatives - but the environmental cost of producing battery powered cars is at least as great as that for the oil to operate a really efficient gasoline or diesel auto.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are horribly misinformed Posted by: lynned2002
» RE: Not so sure about "peak oil" Posted by: newawakening

Comments are closed-

Yes, conflict is inevitable
Posted by: daw13 on Sep 24, 2009 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but not quite as suggested in this piece. More likely the conflict between global haves and have nots described by Orwell in 1984. The great danger for we the non-elite citizens of the world is our "leader's" pathological confidence in their ability to deal with too-many-people-not-enough-oil not through policies of conservation but through policies of extermination. Any of us who imagine they can pull this off, to our benefit as well as theirs, are as delusional as they are. So many people I meet, including well educated people, view the worst case scenario as one in which Western Empires successfully control the world in awful fashion; killing off millions, reducing democracies among their own citizens but keeping all alive and fairly comfortable. This is pure nonsense and the sooner we all wake up to that fact the sooner we begin to realize our human potential for survival in the face of probably the most serious challenge our species has faced to date.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Peak Oil just one of the problems
Posted by: marktab on Sep 24, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just want to suggest www.chrismartenson.com and his free crash course which is the best review of what humanity faces "soon", including Peak Oil, Over Ppulation, Species Extinction/The Environment, and a picture of today's Economic Reality. It is time to get serious if we want to do Right by those that follow us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What is so bumpy about switching energy sources?
Posted by: Todd McClintock on Sep 24, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Discover a source of energy.

2. Make profits from it and encourage spending.

3. Invent a crisis and raise the prices.

4. Repeat steps 1-3 !

Brilliant !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

No horses
Posted by: caple66wood on Sep 24, 2009 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article on the problems we, our children, and out grandchildren face from peak oil.

Note there is nothing here about the collapse of industrial civilization that the back-to-nature crowd is so enthusiastic about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Addiction........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 24, 2009 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Americans are addicted to OIL is a given! Big homes in the suburbs, big cars, consumerism run wild. And with so many people unwilling to look at the reality - whether "peak oil is 15 or 30 years away is not the question, the question is do we continue to kick the can of building alternatives to OIL now, or do we stick our collective heads in the sand and wait until our children and grandchildren are forced to do something or perish!

Do we look at this not just as a "lifestyle" change, but as a change to help "our environment" by reducing our carbon output, and allowing the Earth to rest just a bit from our intemperate insatiate appetites of more more more! Yes, it will require that we stop "subsidizing" (ok WELFARE) Agribusiness over real farmers, we may have to cut back on our driving distances to work, we may actually have to start hanging clothes on the line! But for all that we may loose, as a people in this nation - the gains that we get in return - less stress, more quality time with friends & family, time to walk and smell the flowers is priceless!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What distant future?
Posted by: inprov73 on Sep 24, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmmm ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Elite control of energy
Posted by: frankly1 on Sep 24, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you look back at the history the ruling elite they have always controlled the energy supply. When people burned wood for fuel they "owned" the forrest and you would be killed for taking a tree branch. When coal became the common fuel they owned the mines and the methods of transport of coal and so controlled the market and price. Now they control the oil and gas supply and the market and the governments that issue policy. They must maintain the status quo to keep the flow of wealth from the many to the tiny few. The technology now exists for ordinary people to detach themselves from central power generation so the elites must maintain the current system until they can control that technology and continue the exploitation at any cost both to the planet or humanity. If you think the sociopaths that control society would not destroy us to stay in control you need to read some history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good post! Posted by: Paul_C
» Excellent post Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

A Barrel of Water Will Soon Equal 200 Barrels of Oil!
Posted by: MarkGoldes on Sep 24, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The love affair with the automobile opens a surprising path to sharply reducing the need for fossil fuels.

Revolutionary new technology will make possible electric cars that need no recharge - as well as hybrid engines that might need to be fueled with only one gallon of water for each thousand miles of driving.

See the article: 4 Steps to Revive the Auto Industry and the Economy on the website: http://www.aesopinstitute.org

This outlines breakthroughs leading to cars and trucks that need no fossil fuel or recharge. Later, more advanced versions will become power plants when parked, wirelessly selling electricity to the local utility.

The science is not yet in the textbooks and will understandably be greeted with widespread skepticism. However, independent laboratory validation of one remarkable breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. It produced far more heat than can readily be explained by existing science, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The experiments can and should rapidly be repeated at national laboratories and other universities.

The Rowan validation began the process of proving that new technology can allow a barrel of water to replace 200 barrels of oil!

Radically new technologies will seductively let the love affair with vehicles change much of what is currently believed about energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

But for 'Merkuh's owning-class....
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 24, 2009 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We could have a massive "conversion" to non-dinojuice energy. It's a conscious choice to go slow, to do things after the fact to be short sighted, massive-profit oriented and all other manner of bullshit stoopid.

We are the innerant bein' led by the blind and stoopid.

By 2030 I predict massive "relocation" camps for anyone below owning class where they will serve as slave labor for the owning-ruling classes who will live in subcontractor secured, heavily fortified cities. And these will be powered by alternative energy. Oh, and the Jeebus people will run the breeding camps for the elites... it's their obsession afterall: controlling breeding stock (women) and sycophancying the "authorities."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A dystopian vision... Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

I beg your pardon
Posted by: oldhippy39 on Sep 24, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to my daughter & son-in-law who live
in south west Texas, right among the derricks,
there is enough oil under south west Texas to last us into the next century, not tomention all the oil that is off shore on both coasts.
Problem is, the major oil companies don't want to drill there. All that excess oil would drive
down the price of gas.
While I'm very much in favor of alternative energy, the technology is just beginning. Oil would be a handy stop-gap. I'd nothing better
than to see Exon-Mobile go out of business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's not the question Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: That's not the question Posted by: newawakening

Comments are closed-

Hempseed oil would curb the addiction.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 24, 2009 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah but who wants to listen ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I believe it is true...
Posted by: zigy on Sep 24, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the bulk of oil is used to produce plastic and for commercial transportation purposes. But it goes without saying that a significant portion is used (wasted) in private automobile transportation. We Americans have been profoundly brainwashed into believing self-mobility is irksome and impractical and that we therefor must have a car. I gave up my car fifteen years ago and I run to and from my job. It is a relaxing and refreshing commute of 25 minutes to an hour (depending upon how much mileage I want). I arrive at work feeling invigorated and at my apartment in the evening feeling refreshed. Humans evolved to run on the African savanna two millions years ago. Our survival depended upon it. There is archeological evidence that our ancestors could (and did when they needed to e.g. to track wounded game or find a water supply) run up to fourty miles a day. Makes modern marathoners look like "wimps" in comparison. Oh, and I'm no kid. I'm 52 and I easily run 70 to 80 miles a week.

My point is only this: We have been brainwashed by auto and oil to think human locomotion is unnatural, irksome, and impractical--don't buy it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This author ignores that oil wars have already started
Posted by: Jeff Greef on Sep 24, 2009 3:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author tells us:

None of these disputes has yet resulted in violent conflict

referring to geo-political posturing for oil territory. The wars in Iraq and Afganistan are both primarily oil related. 9/11 and the "war on terrorism" are false pretenses for conducting wars overseas to get control of oil territory. The countries north of Afganistan have oil and gas reserves, the only way to get it out NOT via Russia, or China, or Iran, is through Afganistan, where we built and continue to defend a pipeline. We are in Iraq for oil, no other reason.

We as Americans should not allow our government and industry to make war for oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

alternative fuels
Posted by: MIST on Sep 24, 2009 9:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one has mentioned a possible future fuel, Helium-3. In 50 years, if mankind survives disease and pollution, we may have the technology to mostly replace petrochemicals and coal for fuel. Getting helium-3 won't be easy. Drilling 7 miles below the ocean for oil seems simple by comparison to mining helium-3 and shipping it back from the lunar surface. But if we perfect fusion reactors, space elevators, and lunar shipments of sizable mass, it would take about one shuttle-bay size of cargo of helium-3 to supply all the power the U.S. needs for a year! I'd prefer to believe that mankind will grow up and live gently on the earth. But I don't. Yet new technologies lie on the horizon if we can endure that long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

MTS Converter
Posted by: peker on Sep 26, 2009 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though our oil addiction is about to make life a lot nastier,oil is the most important resources to our social.We can not stop development for environment pollution.Imeem downloader,
FLV Converter,
MTS Converter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Light Sources and Photobioreactors
Posted by: femtobeam on Sep 28, 2009 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer is algae and single cell biomass and photosynthetic bacteria in closed loop photobioreactors. This has already been developed in the US.

They produce huge amounts of biomass, toxin free. Uses include biofuel, it cleans up CO2 emissions, has a nice tradeoff with polluters to clean up their mess, use their waste, and it replenishes ocean fish, feeds animals and people, while providing a natural organic fertilizer source. The oil can be used directly for home heating oil or cooking. It will also take care of the rising tides, oxygenate the atmosphere and eliminate hunger and disease.

The reason it is being deliberately overlooked is because it is the disruptive technology that the oil, gas and coal companies do not want to happen. They do everything they can to prevent it from happening, including pretending like it still needs to be developed.

All that is required is funding for a manufacturing facility in the US instead of China, but jobs in America are too much for them to bear.

Entrepreneurs and scientists are in as much danger as outdoor cooks (witches) were during the dark ages. The inquisition is now out to destroy ideas and small business, stealing it and handing it over to the new master we owe our future to.

A planet consuming China.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Those thinking about long-term recovery,
Posted by: reg373 on Sep 29, 2009 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
know the enviroment will be a big winner in the conversion to biofuels & biopower --- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

not yet in the textbooks
Posted by: lukewatson on Oct 8, 2009 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The science is not yet in the textbooks and will understandably be greeted with widespread skepticism. However, independent laboratory validation of one remarkable breakthrough has taken place at Rowan University. Buy specialist It produced far more heat than can readily be explained by existing science, clearly suggesting a new source of energy is involved. The experiments can and should rapidly be repeated at national laboratories and other universities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS