Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

High Crime on the High Line: Why Is NYC's Highest-Profile Park Using Amazon Wood?

By Tim Doody, AlterNet. Posted September 5, 2009.


The group that masterminded the park built all the chaise lounges, benches, bleacher seating and decking with tropical hardwood ripped from the jungles of the Amazon.
highline
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If a tree falls in the Amazon, will anyone in New York City hear it?

What about if hundreds, perhaps thousands, of trees fall, and are then exported to Gotham's highest-profile park?

That question has kept me up for many nights after I strolled along the High Line, located in New York's infamous meat packing district, on opening day.

First, I was wowed by the innovative recovery of urban space, by the tastefully rusted bones of an old elevated railroad trestle sprouting native grasses and pedestrian throughways.

Then my stomach flipped. It was the furniture. More specifically, the wood. I didn't see the growth rings that usually mark wood logged from temperate forests, which meant that this wood likely came from under the perpetually moist canopy of a rain forest.

Turns out, Friends of the High Line, the group that masterminded the park, built all the chaise lounges, benches, bleacher seating and decking with tropical hardwood ripped from the jungles of the Amazon.

Friends' wood of choice, ipê, grows throughout the Amazon at an average of 1 to 2 trees per acre; well-funded loggers bulldoze a virtual ant farm of roads to chase down these scattered trees.

In the Amazon, the consumption of export -- quality wood, including ipê, is the primary factor leading to deforestation -- mostly because logging roads open up previously inaccessible areas of forest to land speculators, cattle ranchers and farmers.

To make matters worse, according to the Brazilian government, 80 percent of logging in the Amazon is done illegally. And the heavily armed criminal cartels doing this logging also have a nasty record of stealing land from indigenous people and killing those who get in their way. Illegal loggers are even known to employ slave laborers, as reported in an exposé by investigative reporters from Knight-Ridder.

Unfortunately, when it comes to materials used in New York City's public infrastructure, Friends' preferences are far from unique. Tim Keating, executive director of Rainforest Relief, an environmental watchdog group, said that during the 1960s, the city's Department of Parks and Recreation began using tropical woods for renovations to 10-plus miles of coastal boardwalks.

By the mid-80s, multiple city agencies were, in his words, "on tropical forest feeding frenzy." They imported rain forest wood not just for all the boardwalks, but also for the promenade of the Brooklyn Bridge and tens of thousands of park benches, subway track ties, and pilings along the Staten Island Ferry terminals (each piling is a single tree from old-growth Guyanese rain forest).

While Keating boasts that his group has stopped more tropical wood imports to North America than any other environmental organization, he's found New York City to be an especially tough nut to crack.

Still, there have been some successes, most of them quite recent.

In 2007, the Department of Parks and Recreation finally vowed to spare "approximately 390 square miles of rainf orest every 20 years" by using concrete and recycled plastic in place of tropical hardwood for city boardwalks. They claim that these materials "may last up to five times longer than traditional wooden boardwalks, with little or no maintenance, saving the city time and money in the long run."

This year, the Department of Transportation ordered five pilings composed of recycled plastic lumber to test in the fenders of the Staten Island Ferry. As well, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has acknowledged that "it is possible, as some have alleged" -- the "some" being Rainforest Relief -- "that New York City is one of the leading consumers of tropical hardwoods in the nation." Even if Bloomberg is short on solutions, at least he's addressing the problem, which is more than can be said for Friends of the High Line.

How could Friends have done this? It had culled together an innovative design team. It had garnered millions of dollars from liberal donors and enlisted the likes of David Bowie and Diane von Furstenberg for well-publicized advocacy. Was it too much to expect that, as Friends dreamed an abandoned railroad trestle into 3 acres of urban park, it wouldn't devour critical habitat 3,000 miles away? It seems entirely counter to the whole spirit of the project, ostensibly geared toward reclamation.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: rainforest, lumber, wood, high line, sustainable wood

Tim Doody's writing has appeared in the Brooklyn Rail, the Indypendent, Brevity, Two Hawks Quarterly, the Rambler Magazine, Topic Magazine, the forthcoming Word Riot and various anthologies, including That’s Revolting (Soft Skull). He manages the Web site RainforestsOfNewYork.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don't they get it?!
Posted by: pj1fwb on Sep 5, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shame! It seems to me that this is really a fucking crime! The more people see renewable resourses the more they will like and use them. What they have done is to make this wood more popular with the people who have the money to just order and chop!It really should be against the law!Just my thought!Peace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why ipe?
Posted by: BlueTigress on Sep 5, 2009 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They were used to seeing it at Coney Island, so it would seem a natural choice.

That and their focus was on creating an urban park not saving a bit of the rain forest.

I think it's called tunnel vision.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» yep Posted by: hurricane hugo
Rip their guts out!
Posted by: adelaney on Sep 5, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The b*stards that arranged for the heartless murder of wonderful, irreplaceable, trees are worthless and should be skinned alive, then have their guts ripped out, whilst they sip pina coladas on their ipê chairs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing is off-limits to Corporatist New York City & Mayor Bilderberg!
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Sep 5, 2009 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story needs to be spread far & wide!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The alternatives cited are even worse
Posted by: crzypt on Sep 5, 2009 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two of the alternatives cited in this article are far worse than Ipé, all things considered

Yellow Pine is a catch-all trade name for many different subspecies of Southern Pines, some of which are reasonably durable (10 years+ of outdoor exposure without significant loss of structural strength), and some of which are no better than Ponderosa Pine - which will turn to mush in less than 5 years outside

An even bigger problem with all of the "Yellow" Pines is their tendency to break up into some mighty impressive splinters. Not a desirable characteristic for uses like Boardwalks and outdoor furniture, where barefoot humans (or thinly clad posteriors) are common. Yellow pine will do this when freshly milled. Outdoor exposure just makes this tendency worse.

Plastic lumber may be durable, but it is a nightmare to work with - ask any carpenter who has ever used the stuff. It also heats up in the sun far more than any sort of real lumber that I've ever encountered, North American or Exotic - on bright summer days, enough to make touching the stuff with bare skin a mighty painful experience. I find it quite telling that the author didn't mention its two biggest drawbacks: the Price per board foot (waaaaaay higher than even most exotics like Ipé), and the fact that it is ultimately dependent on oil, like any other plastic product.

There are two North American hardwoods that have been long neglected by the commercial lumber industry, that will fill the bill very well for outdoor service. Neither were even mentioned in this article, but are well known to boatbuilders and older farmers (who still remember using them for fenceposts). Both will easily last 40+ in direct soil contact - undoubtedly the harshest possible environment for natural materials - with no chemical treatment whatsoever.

Black Locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia) and Black Mulberry (Morus Nigra) both grow (literally) like weeds - tolerant of poor soils and most environmental extremes short of pure desert conditions. After seasoning, both are highly resistent to degradation by boring insects and fungi. Black Locust is even a legume, pulling nitrogen from the air in order to supplement soil nutrients.

So why aren't these woods available in your neighborhood lumberyard? Pretty simple, really. Their natural growth habits don't lend them to producing extra-long sticks of perfectly straight lumber. That natural tendency can be worked around, to a certain extent, by intelligent forestry practices. Consumers getting used to the idea of using wood with (gasp! horror !) visible knots that are structurally inconsequential would probably help matters. Georgia Pacific and Weyerhauser don't want to bother with either education or resource development, and consequently ignore these woods completely. OTOH your local sawmill will very likely know where to find plenty of Black Locust or Mulberry trees, and will also be perfectly happy to mill as many of those trees are you care to buy, plus that lumber will be cost competitive with the crappy sort of pine you can buy at any Big Box store - and beat the price of Ipé hands down

Food for thought......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The alternatives cited are even worse Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
» Excellent post. Posted by: WhatNow?
Just Not Getting It
Posted by: gryphonisle on Sep 5, 2009 6:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That this is happening in New York City, in a project run for the City, by people one would think would be alert to these sort of things shows just how little we've progressed as a society. In order to cool the planet and reverse the damage humans have caused, humans will have to change the way they think about doing things, and then change the way things are done. So far, it's quite clear that we haven't made that leap, and we're still just talking about it. This sort of idiocy should be something that DOESN'T happen, yet it's not only happening, it's happening in New York City.

At this point, environmentalists really need to stop and think about what they're doing, and how they're going about it. Clearly, most of the people are not getting the message. Legislation certainly isn't the answer, when the folks who make the rules are acting as if there aren't any. Amazon woods are being used because the people at the top are not including themselves and their plans when they think about the planet, in the same way the average citizen isn't taking in the larger picture when they toss a piece of litter on the pavement. That thought process needs to change. It's no different, getting the person on the street to stop littering and the people at the top to stop squandering precious environmental resources in city projects. All that litter has to go someplace, and all that wood comes from forests that have to be cut down. Nobody is seeing the end result, the mountains of litter or the trash in the Ocean's gyre, or the wasteland where an Amazon forest stood, but the end result is a dying planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All it means......
Posted by: RickW on Sep 5, 2009 7:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....is that no one really gives a damn about the environment. We talk the talk all right, but very few of us walk the walk -- because we are so frigging lazy (not to mention spoiled).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No.... Posted by: henderson
» RE: No.... Posted by: richholland
» RE: No.... Posted by: RickW
Not always what it seems.
Posted by: reelectnoone on Sep 6, 2009 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know the details of this logging adventure. I can say that some years ago I was on a press junket to the Corkscrew Sanctuary near Naples Florida ( Everglades area ) where they were in the final steps of installing epe wood boardwalks in the park. In speaking to the parks supervisor he said he personally went to the supplier in Brazil to check the logging situation first because of their commitment to the environment. He chose a logger that harvested only a specific number of trees per year allowing for replanting and growth in order to sustain their sanctuary and the environment.

With respect to the environment back home, he explained that these walk ways could last a hundred years, saving replacement every 15 or so years saving many more trees over time.

When it came time to clean burn near walkways they no longer need to clear all the brush to protect the walkways. This wood is virtually fire proof and he said you could watch 3 foot flames shoot through the spaces in the deck without so much as singing the wood.

There is no paint or preservative needed which further protects local watershed. The wood cannot be carved by vandals it is so hard. You have to drill and bolt it because you cannot drive a nail into it.

It is a truly marvelous beautiful wood for this purpose and if harvested in a responsible way it actually saves more trees over time than using inferior lumber that must be cut over and over within the lifetime of epe wood.

This is not to say I support wholesale clear cutting of any forest. This wood like any other needs to be managed so it can last. After all wood is a renewable resource if you treat it as such.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US Army are more cutting edge
Posted by: mutualaid on Sep 7, 2009 5:27 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in their choice of advanced (economically and structurally-sound) materials than both the "Green" Mayor of New York (Bloomberg) and the 'green' design firm responsible for the reDONKULOUS High Line choice of "sustainable" pristine forest wood!

Oh, the short-sighted design firm responsible for the High Line design is Diller Scofidio + Renfro.

Why New York City government continues to buy wood from countries whose own law enforcement agencies have found that illegal exports constitute 80% of total and are controlled by criminal syndicates raises SERIOUS QUESTIONS of whether vendors (including designers) and politicians funding these expensive projects in New York City (and elsewhere) who are sourcing illegal materials from Amazon and the Forest Stewardship Council) are themselves connected to organized crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement