Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Nobody Knows What Nanoparticles Do -- Yet They Are in Your Food, Cosmetics, and Toys

By Carole Bass, E Magazine. Posted July 11, 2009.


Not even the world's leading nanoscientists know what nanoparticles do inside the body or the environment
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It's a beautiful summer day. You pull on your stain-resistant cargo shorts and odor-resistant hiking socks, gulp down an energy-boosting supplement, slather yourself with sunscreen and head out for a ramble in the woods. Are you poisoning yourself? When you get home, you jump in the shower and toss your clothes in the wash. Are you poisoning the environment? Maybe.

Your sunscreen, energy drink and high-tech clothing may be among the 800-plus consumer products made with nanomaterials: those manufactured at the scale of atoms and molecules. Sunscreen that turns clear on the skin contains titanium dioxide, an ordinary UV-blocker in extraordinarily small particles. Odor-eating socks are made with atoms of germ-killing silver. Supplement makers boast of amazing health effects from swallowing nanosolutions that are completely untested for effectiveness or safety. And that stain-repellant clothing? The manufacturer won't even tell you what nanomaterials are in it.

The problem is not just that you, the consumer, don't know what's in the products you use. The much bigger problem is that at the nanoscale, common substances behave in uncommon ways. And nobody--not even the world's leading nanoscientists--knows what nanoparticles do inside the body or in the environment.

Nanotechnology, a fast-growing global industry, is essentially unregulated. Advocates and independent scientists agree that we need to get ahead of the risks before it's too late. Some call for a moratorium on the riskiest nanoproducts. Some say we just need more research, and more protection for workers in the meantime. All are worried about unleashing a powerful new technology that could have vast unintended consquences. Nanomaterials are in food, cosmetics, clothing, toys and scores of other everyday products. Yet when it comes to trying to get a handle on them, we can't answer the most basic questions. What companies are using nanomaterials, and where? What kinds, and in what amounts? How much of the potentially hazardous stuff is escaping into the air, water and soil? Into our food and drinks? Nobody knows.

At a February workshop on what research is needed to better understand nanorisks, speaker after speaker presented questions without answers. Rutgers University environmental scientist Paul Lioy, assigned to talk about human exposures to nanomaterials, was especially blunt.

"This is basically virgin territory," he said. "The fact that it's virgin territory is not good for the field, and it should be fixed really quick."

Big Benefits, Big Risks?

Nanomaterials are not new. Some exist naturally, and others result from combustion--like the ultrafine particles in diesel exhaust that have been linked to respiratory and heart diseases.

What's new is nanotechnology, the ability to manufacture and manipulate minuscule materials into forms such as quantum dots, spherical buckyballs, and cylindrical carbon nanotubes. These engineered nanomaterials take on unusual properties: changing color, for example, or becoming electrically conductive, or penetrating cell walls. And they have many uses. Carbon nanotubes, or CNTs--made by rolling up sheets of graphite just one atom thick--are extremely light and strong; they show up in high-end tennis rackets and bicycle frames. Nanosilver is used as an antimicrobial agent in everything from paint to toothpaste to teddy bears. Nanometal oxides are blended into ceramics and coatings, making them more durable.

While there's no universal definition, the "nano" moniker generally covers materials between one and 100 nanometers. A nanometer is one billionth of a meter, or between 50,000 and 100,000 times thinner than a human hair.

Nanotech offers enormous potential benefits. Medical researchers are investigating ways to use nanomaterials to target tumors and then deliver tiny amounts of drugs directly inside the cancer cells, sparing the healthy cells. Possible green tech applications include cheaper, more efficient solar panels and water-filtration systems, energy-saving batteries and lighter vehicles that use less fuel.

That's the upside. But exciting new wonder materials often reveal a dark side, too. Asbestos--now synonymous with bankrutpcy-inducing lawsuits and slow, painful death--was once seen as a miraculous fireproofing agent that would save millions of lives. Much of its damage could have been avoided if industry and government had heeded the ample danger signs. Now, early research on the potential hazards of nanotech is producing danger signs of its own. Workers handling nanomaterials face the biggest risks. But there are concerns for consumers, too, especially with products--like cosmetics, food and supplements--that go directly on or in the body. And with potentially toxic nanomaterials washing down the drain and into the water and soil, there's reason to worry about environmental damage as well.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, environment, nano

Carole Bass, a journalist, writes about the environment, workplace health, legal affairs and other subjects.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My own experience with nanoparticles--tooth repairs and 9/11
Posted by: whole2th on Jul 11, 2009 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know of two nano particle associations that affect our lives--one positively and one quite negatively.

Dental plastic filling materials now composed of nano particle fillers are much smoother and strong compared to more grainy and less polishable dental plastics of earlier generations.

An exotic explosive, nano thermite, has been discovered in four World Trade Center dust samples

a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=14309>Turner Construction Company involvement in many aspects of World Trade Center "renovations of steel fireproofing', demolition cleanup ....seems Turner Construction has a lot more explaining to do than OBL and his 19 merry [and phantom and intelligence-connected] men. Chances of this being investigated?....very slim to none IMO, unless people push for it - and hard.

There are those who see progression in science as the bain of our culture. In the case of discovering nano-thermite in the WTC debris, this one fact overturns the official 9/11 story and will topple all the dominos.

We will get our country back to the degree that we confront pure evil. Alternet seems not to be up to the task--and seems to be COMPLICIT in the coverup by ignoring the new discoveries of 9/11 evidence that are earth-shaking.

In this cover up, those with editorial control at Alternet put themselves in a position of possible indictment for conspiracy to cover up mass murder and high treason, IMO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "...tooth repairs and 9/11" Posted by: GuitarBill
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» More Info/Access to the towers Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» Insider Stock Trading on 911 Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» Hani Hanjour... Stunt Pilot? Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» They didn't use cell phones, @$$. Posted by: GuitarBill
» More from the Q group Posted by: pfgetty
» I live in Area 51, what is a bedroom? Posted by: grindermonkey
» You brought it up Posted by: GuitarBill
» More proof that you're an idiot. Posted by: GuitarBill
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» Here's who hires GuitarBill Posted by: pfgetty
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» Talk about paranoia! Wow! Posted by: pfgetty
» Talk about a liar. WOW! Posted by: GuitarBill
» NOW THAT IS A THREAT!!!!! Posted by: pfgetty
So the author's solution is...
Posted by: badkitty68 on Jul 11, 2009 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
visiting the potential toxins and unknown harm onto defenseless animals??? Wake up, you self-important twit. Number one, might doesn't make right - you are not entitled to inflict whatever harm you fancy on other sentient beings. If humans want to use a substance, then they need to study its effects on their own bodies. Period. Since these nano particles are in so many things in common use, that shouldn't be a problem.
Number two, one can never accurately extrapolate animal data to humans - ever. It has become clear in recent years that sometimes data can't be extrapolated from one gender to the other in clinical trials.
Test all your little toxic creations on yourselves and leave the animals alone. They are not your disposable "tools", asswipe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how do you "fix" a virgin?
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jul 11, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The fact that it's virgin territory is not good for the field, and it should be fixed really quick." - how do you "fix" a virgin? well...you fuck a virgin...i guess dr. loiy is telling us we're fucked...the fact that nanoparticles are ALREADY in use and out in the global environment means the cat is already out of the bag...it's too late to "get ahead of the risks"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Huh? Posted by: bingahaba
AND THE BEAT GOES ON
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 11, 2009 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we assume that nanoparticles are formed by yet smaller paricles and that there's a natural backward regression? I guess there's no such thing as 'nothing'. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Metaphysics deals with "nothing." Posted by: grindermonkey
Will this be "money wins, we lose" once again?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jul 11, 2009 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are still discovering the deleterious biological effects (heart disease, strokes, Alzheimer's, etc.) of microparticles in polluted air that are produced by earlier miracle technology, petroleum refining. So we should be quite cautious in releasing into widespread use nanotechnology – employing even finer, more invasive and biologically active particles – before we have at least some idea of the consequences.

But no, we won't be. Not when there is profit to be made in being the first to corner the market. So, expect to see some other health problems arise due to our intellectual arrogance, lack of foresight and ordinary caution; of course, by then, they'll be another "miraculous new technology" that will claim to cure the ills of this one – and it, too, will command a high price and profit for its makers as well, and also will most likely produce threats to health of its own.

We are screwing around with biological relationships and interdependency that have been developed over millions of years; and, so far, our efforts have been divided between some improvements and sometimes catastrophic results. So is time, once again, to seriously ask ourselves, just who does technology serve – and just because we CAN, does that mean we always, always SHOULD?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

corporations rule people die
Posted by: atomic on Jul 11, 2009 5:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as corporations and banks run our government good luck passing any regulations ... have you noticed Obama is pretty much going right along with what ever corporations want to do? The supreme court has been in their hands for a long time ... I wonder if there ever was a government where the people actually ruled ... if you think it was the U.S. you are delusional. Maybe for about 14 days after the constitution was signed but even before that London and the banking families conspired to control the money and thus the government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No problem... wear tinfoil hats!
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 12, 2009 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and big brother can't hear your thoughts anymore

nana particles can grandmother the nano ones maybe too

anyways, the the good that can come from inert nano particles can outweigh the negatives, only time will tell tho and people should be aware of any risks in products with them in it.

the science community is all hush hush about the medical implications that these little guys can do to our benefit.. we don't need scary articles to undue the serious good that will come from this research

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Type 0 civilization using Type 1 technologies turn out bad
Posted by: Changling on Jul 13, 2009 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are a Type Zero level meaning we don't have control of our environment or our baser selves. We still have wars etc. some of us have delved into Genetically Modified Organisms too which haven't been vetted and researched before their introduction into our biome. Now it is going on with the infant technology of the very small whose altered properties just haven't been studied carefully an long enough before being marketed to us all.

The dangers can outweigh the benefits easily. Unforeseen consequences will abound the longer it is allowed to be wedded to profit first, not our survival.

A Type 1 society wouldn't be making these kinds of errors. They would know better and wouldn't be tempted by such superficial trivialities as financial corporate profit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Off-topic bickering is getting REALLY OLD!!
Posted by: pjnaltykins on Jul 19, 2009 8:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For God's sakes, with you two bickering back and forth about a topic not related to the article, this has ballooned into over 180 comments.

Cut the sh*t, guys! Get a room or something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement