Are Climate-Change Deniers Guilty of Treason?
Also in Environment
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman
How an Entire Town Leveled By a Tornado Is Rebuilding Green
Melissa Knopper
Obama, It's Time to Lead on Climate Change in Copenhagen
Janet Redman
We're Literally Blowing Up Our Clean Energy Future
Nell Greenberg
Who's to Blame for All the Dithering on Climate Legislation?
Faiz Shakir
Putting Farm Animal Protection on the Map, One Step at a Time
Paul Shapiro
And as I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn't help thinking that I was watching a form of treason — treason against the planet.
Mr. Krugman then gives a rundown of the latest climate research, whose predictions are far worse than previously thought. He describes climate change as a "clear and present danger" – borrowing a phrase first deployed in 1919 by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. to imprison a man for opposing the draft – and concludes:
Still, is it fair to call climate denial a form of treason? Isn't it politics as usual?
Yes, it is — and that's why it's unforgivable.
Do you remember the days when Bush administration officials claimed that terrorism posed an "existential threat" to America, a threat in whose face normal rules no longer applied? That was hyperbole — but the existential threat from climate change is all too real.
Yet the deniers are choosing, willfully, to ignore that threat, placing future generations of Americans in grave danger, simply because it's in their political interest to pretend that there's nothing to worry about. If that's not betrayal, I don't know what is.
See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, skeptics
Eoin O'Carroll is a blogger for The Christian Science Monitor.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.