Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

From Farm to Pharma: How Animals Ended Up Living in Confined Feedlots Guzzling Antibiotics

By Will Allen, Chelsea Green Publishing. Posted July 6, 2009.


Here's the history behind the transition from farm to feedlot and why Big Pharma rules the barn.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

We are now living in a post fast-food-awareness reality, riding on the wake of Michael Pollan and Eric Schlosser's books (who rode on the wake of Wendell Berry), films like Food, Inc., renegade farmer heros like Joel Salatin and Eliot Coleman, and the ever-increasing popularity of urban gardening and locavores. But awareness, like anything, has its dark side.

Perhaps the hardest thing we post fast-food-aware people face now, is actually doing something -- apart from reading the book and watching the movie, that is. Because things like slavery were abolished, but racism persists. And women got the vote, but men still make more money in the workplace. So maybe "organic" yogurt is now on Wal-Mart's shelves, but that doesn't mean outdated, inhumane practices like factory farming will not persist. They'll just call it something else. It's a common thing, historically -- big business trying to blind the masses with our own beacons.

The following is an excerpt from The War on Bugs by Will Allen. It has been adapted for the Web.

The small American farms that raised livestock as well as row or orchard crops and had suffered through depression and war faced even greater challenges shortly after World War II. Farmers were buffeted by the costs of changing both equipment and practices as farms became more chemically intensive and mechanized. Small farmers struggled in vain to compete with the further consolidation and expansion of the highly integrated farm monopolies, such as Continental Grain, Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland, and Richland Rice and Dunavant Enterprises and J.G. Boswell in cotton.

In their struggle to survive, many sought to copy the corporate industrial model of farming and got bigger. Others attempted to sell directly to local outlets as they always had. But following the war, an urban and suburban housing expansion took place near many cities that raised the value and the tax base on millions of acres of farmland. The increased tax base and increased noise and smell ordinances made it more difficult to farm conveniently and profitably close to cities. This cut tens of thousands of growers off from marketing their products directly to consumers.

Then, in the early 1950s, chemical researchers threw another technical dagger at family farmers. The chemical-pharmaceutical firms introduced a dramatically new technology that completely transformed the meat, poultry, and dairy industries -- antibiotic farming. This miracle technology allowed farmers for the first time to confine large numbers of cows, pigs, and chickens in enclosed areas and still keep them healthy. Advertised as a revolution in animal management, this breakthrough resulted in no small part from the discovery that antibiotics, when added in subtherapeutic dosages to animal feeds, could be used to promote weight gain and prevent diseases. These management practices set in motion the next great reduction of small and diversified family farms in the United States by allowing the creation of huge, intensively managed animal-confinement operations.

In 1949 Dr. Thomas Jukes, working for Lederle Laboratories, a division of American Cyanamid (the first manufacturer of ammonium cyanide in the Americas), was studying several microorganisms to find which ones could produce quantities of B-12, a vitamin largely absent from the soybean- and corndominated livestock diet. One microorganism he studied was the precursor for the antibiotic chlortetracycline, also known as tetracycline. After extensive experimentation, Jukes accidentally found that feeding small amounts of this antibiotic to chicks, piglets, and calves caused them to significantly increase their weight. No one is sure what happened physiologically, but the use of antibiotics somehow suppressed harmful bacteria inside the animal's digestive tract, which enhanced growth.

Jukes and the media heavily promoted the immense possibilities of this discovery, calling it one of the most important developments of the century. In March 1950, the New York Times ran a front-page story on Jukes's findings. Word of Jukes's discoveries occupied the attention of the media for weeks. The New York Daily News even ran a political cartoon that showed Harry Truman administering a growth-promoting dose of tetracycline to a pig in an effort to increase pork for Truman's supporters.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, food, farmers, farming, meat, pharma, michael pollan, sustainable agriculture, food inc, antiobiotics

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The primary failure of western civilization.
Posted by: heid on Jul 7, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If something can't go on, it won't. This is an obviously limited system, one that has chosen to sell off the future for its own profits.

Who cares about the children and grandchildren? Just continue on, pretending that all's okay, that nothing can possibly go wrong - while all is going wrong right under your noses.

We cannot survive when we refuse to acknowledge our place in the order of life. Failing to do that is the primary failure of western civilization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting that B12 is mentioned...
Posted by: Bimbeot on Jul 7, 2009 5:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as it seems that vitamin is often overlooked in the antibiotics equation even as it's presented to vegetarians (and vegans especially) as the reason they are all going to die.

B12 is a bacteria most animals have traditionally obtained from the soil. Our obsession with sanitizing everything with triple washes and solutions is quite new and not something animals have ever done (in fact hens actually prefer water from a hole in the ground than a waterer). There are a lot of interactions in the soil we ignore but which make nutrients available to us.

That's why I question the idea that the antibiotics "somehow suppressed harmful bacteria inside the animal's digestive tract, which enhanced growth" in that they probably killed off all the good bacteria as well which wreaked havoc on digestion of nutrients causing the animals to eat more to meet their needs and therefore growing bigger in the process. Good bacteria don't just keep bad bacteria in check, they help us synthesize needed micronutrients. We just interpret quick growth to mean good but no one can truthfully say the resulting meat from antibiotic treated animals is better for us. One reason organic veggies have been proving to be more healthy and nutrient dense is they have to work a little harder to find the nutrients which allows them to find more types than we would provide that reside at deeper levels. If we eat healthier food we don't need as much to meet our bodies' needs, so we feel full and satisfied quicker and don't have nearly as many cravings... and we don't get as large either.

Bigger animals make for bigger people.

By putting the animals inside (to protect them they say, but it seems more likely to hide them) they no longer get the b12 they need so that too is now part of the supplements in standard feed. But here's the kicker. B12 is still a bacteria which is hampered by antibiotics.

About 40 out of every 100 people in the general population are low in B12 (and we are not talking about the vegetarians and vegans since they represent a much smaller percentage and are generally much more aware of the vitamin).

We haven't even gone into the imbalances of Omega 6 to 3 which seems to be caused by confining creatures, or Vitamin D or Folic Acid or... the general imbalance of the fallout from Atkins induced rejection of plant foods. No, if we say anything at all it is *add* more omega 3... from sources full of mercury, dioxins and PCBs no less.

It sure would be nice if we would take some time to consider the harmful effects of our half-baked ideas such as adding antibiotics (and cyanide for chickens) to feed. But alas, by the time the consequences start showing up in ways too big to ignore it becomes about addressing the symptoms which cause all new consequences.

Further, we are killing the soils and other bacterial exchanges in it by dumping the antibiotic affluent effluent from factory farms all over cropland (to get rid of it not because it's needed) and in waterways through poor practices, leaching, overflow, and spills.

This is all part of why "Peak Soil" is becoming more urgent than Peak Oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement