Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Why a Car-Free Suburbia May Become a Reality

By Lisa Selin Davis, Grist.org. Posted June 23, 2009.


One man in California's East Bay is attempting to build a new car-free community -- and his enthusiasm is catching on.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For more environmental news and humor, sign up for Grist's e-mail list.

California's East Bay -- the collection of towns, cities, and suburbs across the Bay Bridge from San Francisco -- has a lot to boast about. There's the perpetually great weather, enlightened inhabitants, and a halfway decent, if in my opinion overpriced, public transit system in the form of BART. Yet despite BART's 43 stations spanning 95 miles, most folks in the area find they need a car, too.

But one man thinks his town, Hayward -- or at least a part of it -- can make the leap to automobile-free. "I want to live a lifestyle that's less dependent on cars," says Sherman Lewis, a retired poli-sci professor at Cal State East Bay and president of the Hayward Area Planning Association since 1978. But, he admits, he's chosen a relatively difficult way to achieve it, "by trying find 950 other families who want to live the same way."

Lewis has developed plans for Quarry Village, a 1,000-unit development about a mile from the Hayward BART station and a short skip from the Cal State campus and downtown Hayward. It includes townhouses, condos, walking paths, shuttle buses to the rail ... and no garages. It would fill 22 acres on a former rock quarry (hence the name) currently owned by Caltrans, the California DOT; the land is not yet for sale, but Lewis says the agency is supportive of his redevelopment vision. The residences will be officially affordable, at least by Hayward's definition: studios to six-bedrooms between $250,000 and $650,000. Lewis believes the larger units will appeal to telecommuters, who can use the extra bedrooms as offices.

Inside the development, residents would be able to walk to basic amenities -- a restaurant or two, a well-stocked grocery store. For other needs, they could take an on-site shuttle to BART, use the shared or rental car services that would be available, or, if they really want, rent one of the 100 or so parking spots along the perimeter of the neighborhood. Those spots would be auctioned off, starting at perhaps $125 a month, to help subsidize the shuttle service. No one need fear being judged for not giving up his or her car, Lewis assures. "They're going to be congratulated, " he says," because their money will go to pay for everyone else's bus."

The Quarry Village vision is inspired in part by the Vauban development in Freiburg, Germany, a 6,000-resident suburb where parking is limited to the perimeter and a space goes for $40,000. Some seventy percent of Vauban-ers don't own a car, and by all accounts they seem to have adjusted quite easily.

But that's Europe. Are Americans -- some of whom say their car represents them more than their friends of clothes -- ready for the car-free experience?

Well, maybe. Car-sharing, it was reported last week, is on the rise, with city policies and real estate developments encouraging the practice. (I find ZipCar, at $120 per weekend day here in New York, to be prohibitively expensive, but perhaps I'm spoiled by my bicycle and my $2 subway).  Quebec-based CommunAuto asserts that every shared car knocks eight off the road -- that's about 1,800 fewer miles driven per person each year.

So the political climate is ripe for Quarry Village, and perhaps the mindset of many Americans, still stinging from our brief foray into $4 per gallon gas, has properly adjusted. "We have more than 100 people [ready] to sign up to buy these units when they become available," says Lewis.

But when will that be? At the end of May, the Hayward Planning Commission gave the thumbs up to new zoning, permitting higher density and less parking, and Lewis expects the city council to overwhelmingly approve SMU zoning -- sustainable mixed-use -- at the end of June, which Lewis says was created with Quarry Village in mind.

"The city council is unanimously supportive, but all of us are concerned about getting investors and selling units fast enough," says Lewis. That's right, they're still lacking one key component: the money to actually create the neighborhood, despite plenty of interest and excitement. The tagline displayed prominently on the Quarry Village website sums up the current state of the project: "If you'll come, we can build it."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cars, public transit

Lisa Selin Davis’s articles on architecture, real estate, and the environment, among other topics, have appeared in The New York Times, Salon.com, OnEarth, and many other publications. She's the author of the novel Belly and lives in Brooklyn, NY.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I dunno...
Posted by: SpiderWoman on Jun 23, 2009 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow, this sounds more like a way to try to sell a new housing development to fairly well-to-do people in a disastrous economic environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I dunno... Posted by: maxpayne
I left America about 5 years ago
Posted by: dadanbetty on Jun 23, 2009 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because I was fed-up with having to rely on an automobile for pretty everything. I couldn't afford to live in a big city. I also had safety concerns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

car sharing and car-free communities
Posted by: cplot on Jun 23, 2009 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lisa Selin Davis, wrote:

“I find ZipCar, at $120 per weekend day here in New York, to be prohibitively expensive, but perhaps I'm spoiled by my bicycle and my $2 subway”

I'm more familiar with i-Go than ZipCar, but the point of car sharing is for hourly use and not day use. Day use is already more competitively provided by rental car companies in most cases. For car sharing, you can usually reserve the car with little notice and zero hassle, immediately walk over and drive it away to run some errands and then return it few hours later.

The next step, in my view, is to combine the bike sharing concepts in Europe with car sharing to allow the cars to be driven one-way and left at a separate parking facility. Then users can combine two one-way trips to provide inexpensive use of the cars. The bike sharing programs rely on both simple randomization of member needs for bikes and employees who rearrange the bikes when they get too heavily parked in one place or another. Obviously moving cars around is a little more difficult than moving bicycles around, but it could work. Also scooters, segways, and smaller smart-car size cars might make this one way car sharing approach more workable.

As for car-free communities, that sound great. I think it might do better within a quarter or half mile from BART, but a mile is not too bad in a warm climate like the bay area. I also think grocery delivery services like Peapod are an essential part of modern car-free communities. Its actually a much more sensible way to buy groceries – particularly the less perishable groceries. The retail amenities would be an important piece of the puzzle though. Copy/office services, car rental, produce stand, café, parks and recreation, etc. all within walking distance make car-free living more enjoyable than dealing with all the vehicle headaches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» City CarShare rocks (Bay Area) Posted by: launcher
I'm sorry but this article fails to talk about our languished public transportation infrastructure.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 23, 2009 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I go to Northern VA and Washington DC on business trips quite often and I notice that the metro fares are generally steep and yet the service never improves. On buses it is no better. More buses could be used so that people are not forced to wait up to an hour just because they missed their last bus by even a fraction of a minute. The metro rail in Washington and most major cities is even worse. Despite all those rising fees, there have been no new train cars added and delays, slowdowns, mechanical failures, etc ... are on the rise while in Europe it's not as bad. If the author expects us taxpayers to shut up and pay too much for shoddy and shoddier public transportation and give up our cars suddenly, get real. It ain't gonna happen. Even if some report supposedly shows that ridership on the metro and/or carpooling has gone up, most of the time the reports are fudged. Traffic has only gotten worse in most places and unless you're married and are working not too far apart, carpooling is harder to come by for most people and that reality is unlikely to change. Why else would the car companies overadvertise? You would think that with rising unemployment and Obama's so-called promise for "green jobs" that there would be work to improve the public transportation infrastructure but I've done a thorough check and even talked to a few public employees about it and I've received confirmation that they don't care about price gouging customers and engaging in business scandals. No wonder Europe is kicking America's ass on public transportation and we Americans are fucking ourselves to death by being the biggest gas guzzling nation but thankfully, the rising prices of crude oil and rising unemployment rates are confirming that GOD IS PUNISHING AMERICA for drilling and going to wars for oil all the while continuing to promote extreme selfishness and smash good public sharing ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to take other factors into consideration first.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jun 23, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike what the author is singing, it's just the opposite out here in St Louis and my cousin's area of Milwaukee. The rising gas prices may convince some to take the metro but since the metro rail services are unlikely to lower their prices but instead hike them and keep their poor servicing quid pro quo, the idea of a "car free suburbia" is unlikely to happen until Peak Oil makes "cheap" gas virtually impossible. And don't forget that most good jobs are crammed into the cities while the rurals are often depopulated with very few jobs let alone good ones remaining. Even in the suburbs, job growth is limited and often on purpose. Living in the city is far more expensive than living in the suburbs and yet there's uneven job growth when in fact spreading the job growth out would actually go a long ways to reducing driving and congestion. Give us jobs closer to home that we all actually like and we would take it. Otherwise, don't expect any serious changes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Jun 23, 2009 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scam artist-- Why would I pay 6 figures to do with out my car?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This only works in large metro areas
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jun 23, 2009 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a lot of small towns, cities, etc.. without public transportation.

And public transit has to be better designed for all workers, but including low income workers. As small manufacturing has shifted out of the central cities, has transit as an option kept up with it. How about office parks in 'burbs, are they well served by transit for the night janitorial crew.

In suburban job centers, is transit inviting? Or are the buildings way across an large parking lot?

What about cross town traffic, my friend in Ottawa lives east of downtown in the burbs, but works west of downtown in the core city. The transfers and length of time to cross town transit makes it not worth it to her. More cities need to look at burb to burb transit, not just burb to CBD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not many choices
Posted by: WyrdSister on Jun 23, 2009 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here in Minnesota where its F-ing freezing for 9-10 months out of the year!
(it was still 50 degrees until yesterday!!)

First...i dont want to live in a condo or townhouse. or even in a "complex" for that matter; i really like my house and my 1.5 acre yard.

Second...we do not have a good mass transit system. our Bus Lines do not go from suburb to suburb so it can take a few hours to do that as you have to go downtown first and then back out.

...our infant commuter rail line starts downtown and goes two places: airport and the mall; both in the southern suburbs.

...we have two "sane lanes" or car pool lanes. one goes to the southern suburbs and the other to the high end west suburbs of Minnetonka... who, if rich enough, can buy a pass for that lane so they dont have to share a ride.

I have heard that the light rail line is headed north west, but, alas, i live in the north east suburbs.

Doesnt leave alot of choices for us poor suburbanites.

Luckily, i only drive 9 miles to work. I would live to ride a bike, but i work at school and thus only work during the freezing months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Winnipeg and My Blind Grandmother Posted by: lynned2002
There was a time...
Posted by: gerly on Jun 23, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in the day, the mid-late 1970s there was a burgeoning concept invoked by mall magnate James Rouse, known as Columbia, MD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia,_Maryland

Prior to Mr. Rouse’s death, and his son selling out to greedy developers, this planned city centered on quality of life—a city where one could live and work with neighborhood centers and villages that provided necessary services one could access by foot or the bus service. I remember. I lived it at as teenager. It’s doable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Misleading
Posted by: KarenMurphy on Jun 23, 2009 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm disappointed; based on the title of this piece I clicked over to read about real, workable solutions to transform our car-dependent suburbs into car-free communities, but instead we're talking about building yet MORE housing? This is not a solution at all, not when Detroit suburbs are razing entire former neighborhoods in order to conserve resources to support infrastructure, and not when 1/3 Americans (that's an estimate, not a statistic) can't afford to buy a house at all.

Just like driving a Prius helps the elite feel better about the choices they make for the environment ("Look, honey! We recycled today!"), these new communities are great in theory but they should have been built 50 years ago. It's too late now. We can't afford to either build (uses resources) or buy (spiraling into a depression) new housing on a large-enough scale now to make any sort of real difference.

What we do need, however, are real solutions that help everyone. President Obama's proposed high-speed rail will help us move around the country but won't affect people on a day-to-day basis.

So how are we going to get suburbanites out of their cars? Because it's going to happen one way or another.

* Turn malls into community centers, offering day care, elder care, and low-income housing.
* Create public transportation that works. Right now, in most suburban areas, it's a joke.
* Let gas prices skyrocket. Things will sort themselves out one way or another; people will move to cities because they can no longer afford the commute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Misleading Posted by: maxpayne
BART is far from ideal
Posted by: ergoat2004 on Jun 23, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd just like to point out that BART is going to raise fares in July, making a round-trip from Berkeley (in the East Bay) to San Francisco about $8. Not exactly affordable for low income people.

Take this in conjunction with California's budget cuts, they decide to also increase waiting times between trains on nights and weekends. This does not bode well for the ideal of an impetus towards a reduced car usage society.

In my opinion it unacceptable that the BART does not run all night. Meaning if I want to catch a show or meet with friends in SF, I have to cut out early to catch the last train at midnight. If I miss the train by one minute, I'll now have to wait 20 minutes for the next. Last train of the night? I'm stuck in SF until 6AM. Unless I want to take the bus that runs hourly, and makes a 25 minute journey into over 90 minutes (and has limited stops which means a good long walk as well).

And this is the best America has to offer? In 2009?

I do not buy for one minute that the "official" reason behind the BART not running all night; that the tracks need maintenance every night.
What is more likely (and has been uncovered) is that the elite of SF doesn't want and element of lower moneyed class urban youth from the Oakland area (ie black people) in their fair city at all hours of the night.

This is class-ism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Car Free for 4 years
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 23, 2009 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been car free for 4 years. It can be done but it is not always easy. I live in Chicago where it is quite possible, but it requires sacrifice. Public trans takes more time, is unreliable at times, and other passengers can be unbelievable inconsiderate. Pluses include saving money, limiting consumption because you only buy as much as you can carry, and time to read if you can stand others cell phones and blaring i-pods.

I moved North to Evanston and love how almost everything is near me. I can walk to Whole Foods (wish it were Trader Joes instead) as well as several other stores, the post office and THE BEACH!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having lived in Hayward....
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jun 23, 2009 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having lived in Hayward and knowing the area well, what they need is high density housing with more green space for community gardens, so people can be healthier by growing more food and being more active. As a member of the Small House Society we need smaller homes. Period. Smaller cars that are driven less as well as shared. And with an aging populace we need more rapid transit that runs 24/7 and is accessible to disabled and the elderly who need help. You can build all the apartment buildings one wants but unless they are energy efficient, earthquake proof (which the law requires and adds to the cost), and accessible to disabled they are just apartment buildings that encourage people to move to the city and suburbs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes !!!
Posted by: TomOfMaine on Jun 23, 2009 6:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the way to go, can't wait to see this start happening nationwide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Car-free in Oakland and Berkeley
Posted by: badkitty on Jun 23, 2009 7:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is possible to live car-free in certain areas of Oakland and Berkeley now, close to great shopping and great transportation, both bus and BART. Probably the best place for that is the Rockridge area in Oakland. What these two cities have is neighborhood shopping areas surrounded by very nice housing, with bus routes running through them, and occasionally with a BART station nearby. Tonight I took the bus out of San Francisco at 5:10, got off at 5:30 in Berkeley and walked four blocks to my local farmers market, and then walked three blocks home. I could have gotten off one stop later and just walked three blocks home. You can't do better than that. I think Hayward would need this kind of project because it's really suburbia, with not much in the way of neighborhood shopping.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SLIM
Posted by: nolhausen on Jun 23, 2009 10:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interestingly, the answers do seem to be available. The technology is there; the solutions are there. But is the commitment? BART is great for what it does. I rode it for years. It moves people great distances quickly, cleanly, and relatively efficiently; however it is now expensive. But it does not have to be. It can be better subsidized. At the same time there are many buses traveling to the city (San Francisco) from locations far removed from the inner city. And there are many ways to feed those lines as well. In time there will be other rail systems feeding into the BART system, the bus systems, and into ferry systems.

Elders can live in apartment complexes that also feed into these systems privately. They can be in San Francisco, 10 to 15 miles outside of San Francisco, 60 miles away from San Francisco, or more. Again, I lived in such a complex and did make use of the community's local, private bus. All I needed to do was walk downstairs and get on the bus at the time it was departing for given destinations. My sister, age 76, does the same thing today just outside Portland, Oregon.

Pray tell where in this day and age does someone live who does not have local grocery stores, etc, except in remote rural areas? I now live in Marin, just north of San Francisco and we have virtually everything we need right here just minutes away, and there are any number of private delivery systems feeding into all kinds of bus lines private and public that are available to us. But the weather is so good here that many folks could easily get around very well just with a bicycle. In fact, new bike lanes are being added all the time. At some point a trail will be available that completely circles the San Francisco Bay, a distance of some 400 miles. We have access to part of that trail right here in Marin. Free. We can ride our bikes or walk.

Soon, the SmartCar will be electric. The technology is being borrowed from Tesla. Now imagine using a solar system to charge the car. 200 miles or more on one charge to propel a dinky car that can take one third of the parking space of a conventional car. India is now building $2000 cars; China, $3000 cars. The technology is there or soon will be.

But consider a friend here in Marin. My guess is that his car (a small Honda)is about 6-7 years old or more. Despite being in his late 50s he rides his bike or walks and uses public transportation as best he can. He works out of his apartment. The result is that he has just 7,000 miles on his car. There are bus lines close to his home that feed into ferry lines. The ferries, in turn, connect to BART and other bus lines that connect to airports. Not only can he travel all over the Bay Area by public transportation, if he choose to do so, he can reach airports and travel all over the world without ever driving that car.

Does it cost? Yes, but that is only because the public does not subsidize the systems as best it can. That can change. We only need to change our thinking. The biggest problem is that we are a YoYo society (You're on your own.) We lack social values today. We don't want to take care of our neighbors. We expect them to pay their own way all the time. So we have a hard time just moving outside of our own tracks. But it does not have to be so. The technology is there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President Obama, I want an Electric Car
Posted by: ElectricCarsNow on Jun 26, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just read a new book called Two Cents Per Mile: Will Obama Make it Happen with the Stroke of a Pen? Simply put, this book shows the open conspiracy going on between the Department of Energy and corporations to prevent the development of 100% electric cars. I don’t think Obama is fully aware of the consequences of moving toward a hydrogen economy and preserving the internal combustion engine. . The book calls upon the reader to send letters to local, state and federal officials to get us back on track for all electric cars. There are links in the book to customize form letters. If you value America’s future, the environment and are concerned about what kind of world our kids will inherit, you have to check this book out. I bought it on Amazon.com. Type in Two Cents Per Mile or the author's name (Nevres Cefo) and it will take you to the book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement