Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Are Pesticides Causing Parkinson's Disease?

By Robin Marantz Henig, OnEarth Magazine. Posted June 19, 2009.


Scientists are closing in on an inescapable conclusion: Pesticides may be a cause of Parkinson's disease.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This story originally appeared in OnEarth Magazine.

Jackie Christensen was 32 when her body began to betray her. She had just returned to work after the birth of her second son and when she tried to type, two fingers on her left hand refused to cooperate. "They wouldn't go where I would want them to on the keyboard," says Christensen, who at the time -- it was 1997 -- was co-director of the food and health program at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, a Minneapolis think tank. "I also had what they frequently call frozen shoulder, with a very low range of motion in my left arm."

The first neurologist Christensen went to responded flippantly to her suggestion that she might have multiple sclerosis, which she had self-diagnosed because of her relatively young age and the fact that she was female. "If you want me to write that down, I will," she remembers him saying, refusing to pursue the matter further. A second neurologist thought it was all in Christensen's mind and referred her to a psychiatrist. Over the next several months, her symptoms got progressively worse, and she finally consulted neurologist number three. His startling diagnosis: Parkinson's disease.

"I thought, 'I can't have Parkinson's because I'm not old,'" Christensen recalls. But a trial of the standard treatment, a drug called L-dopa, seemed to work. Based on that clinical observation, the diagnosis was confirmed. This was in 1998, when Christensen was not quite 35, and she has been on L-dopa, with varying degrees of success, ever since.

Why did a disease that usually affects people in their sixties and seventies, and that affects men more often than women, strike this vibrant young mother? Christensen, a lifelong environmental activist, suspected an environmental cause -- not only because she was politically inclined to, but because she knew that accumulating scientific information was pointing in that direction. In the past few years, Christensen has been part of a movement exploring a possible connection between exposure to environmental toxins -- in particular, the organophosphate pesticides -- and Parkinson's disease, through her work with the Collaborative on Health and the Environment, a national network of advocacy and scientific organizations. She is co-founder of CHE's working group on Parkinson's Disease and the Environment.

A cause-and-effect relationship between environmental neurotoxins and Parkinson's is difficult to prove. As with many other scientific efforts to establish disease causation through population studies, there will probably never be a smoking gun that settles things once and for all. Population studies can detect associations between certain suspected agents and diseases such as cancer, but it's hard to draw conclusions about what causes a disease from studies that can register only correlations. In the case of Parkinson's and the environment, however, there has been a steadily mounting consensus about such a connection, and the pace has quickened in the past year or so.

A January 2009 consensus statement from CHE, in collaboration with the Parkinson's Action Network, a patient advocacy group, found that there was "limited suggestive evidence of an association" between pesticides and Parkinson's, and between farming or agricultural work and Parkinson's. This followed by just a few months the publication of Environmental Threats to Healthy Aging, a report co-authored by the Science and Environmental Health Network, a consortium of advocacy groups based in Ames, Iowa; it included a summary of 31 population studies that have looked at the possible connection between pesticide exposure and Parkinson's. Twenty-four of those studies, according to the report, found a positive association, and in 12 cases the association was statistically significant. In some studies, the group found, there was as much as a sevenfold greater risk of Parkinson's in people exposed to pesticides. In addition, in April 2009, scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), published a provocative study connecting the disease not only to occupational pesticide exposure but also to living in homes or going to schools that were close to a pesticide-treated field.

Taken together, 30-plus years of research add up to an increasingly persuasive conclusion: exposure to pesticides and other toxins increases the risk of Parkinson's disease, and we are only now beginning to wrestle with the true scope of the damage.

Parkinson's is the second most common neurodegenerative disease (after Alzheimer's) in the United States, affecting between 1 million and 1.5 million Americans. The majority of cases occur in people over 65, about 60 percent of them male. It leads to uncontrollable tremors, muscle rigidity, and the inability to direct your arms or legs to move when you want them to. People with Parkinson's often have a masklike, impassive expression. They may have difficulty speaking clearly and develop a characteristic shuffling gait. Cognitive skills usually are not affected, though some functions like memory and decision-making can be impaired, and, in the face of the gradual and inevitable encroachment of physical limitations, people with Parkinson's often become depressed.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, farming, pesticides

Robin Marantz Henig is a contributing writer to the New York Times Magazine. She is the recipient of a 2009 Guggenheim Foundation fellowship, and is the author of eight books on science, including The Monk in the Garden (Houghton Mifflin), a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mark Purdey, BSE,Madcows
Posted by: mtnprivy on Jun 19, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those of you who are interested in this subject should read about Mark Purdey, organophosphates, and mad cow disease (BSE).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't forget autism. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» The truth is out there. Posted by: Bliss Doubt
a return to organic farming
Posted by: vasumurti on Jun 19, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to see a return to organic farming. In 1989, concern over the use of the pesticide Alar on apples caused many Americans to consider organic produce. We produce pesticides at a rate some 13,000 times faster than we did in the 1950s. Our environment is being flooded by pesticide compounds.

Poisons used to kill insects accumulate on crops, in the soil and in greater concentration in the tissues of living creatures higher on the food chain. The EPA's Pesticide Monitoring Journal reports that "Foods of animal origin (are) the major source of pesticide residues in the diet."

In his Pulitzer Prize nominated book, How to Survive in America the Poisoned, pesticide authority Lewis Regenstein writes: "Meat contains approximately 14 times more pesticides than do plant foods...Thus, by eating foods of animal origin, one ingests greatly concentrated amounts of hazardous chemicals."

A 1976 study by the EPA found the breast milk of mothers who consume animal products to be 50 to 100 times more contaminated by pesticide residues than the milk of vegetarian or vegan mothers.

Organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) are getting more attention today. These utilize natural insect controls, such as predatory insects, weather, crop rotation, pest-resistant varieties, soil tillage, and other environmentally safe practices.

A 1979 Department of Agriculture task force of scientists and economists came to "...positive conclusions on the importance of organic farming and its potential contributions to agriculture and society." Until the end of the Second World War, American farmers produced bountiful harvests without relying on pesticides. There is no reason why America cannot do so again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

whose life is it???
Posted by: maxsmart on Jun 19, 2009 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It could well be that all life on Earth, this tiny jewel in space, basking in the rays of our only begotten Sun, is related, interconnected, shares genetic characteristic!
And as such poisoning one tends toward poisoning everyone in a rather suicidal way!

Employing chemical warfare against life, even weeds we dislike, is an example of the futility of war to solve problems when there is so much collateral damage to the rest of life in general.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: whose life is it??? Posted by: sirios
» RE: whose life is it??? Posted by: Bliss Doubt
And they call me a "health nut."
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 19, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I graduated high school 37 years ago, I have eaten as natural and organic a diet as possible; whole grains, pesticide/antibiotic/hormone-free, and have been berated for it. Meanwhile, at 55, I have no health issues, still fit my size 5 jeans, have virtually no wrinkles.

I continue to buy the majority of my groceries from organic sources and go out of my way to support the small farms. I eat no junk foods. I read ingredient labels and nutrition books.

On a side note, one of my friends has had 4 dogs (different breeds, different sources, different years) all come down with and die from lymphoma. She regularly let them romp on the lawn of a church that was regularly dosed with pesticides. Coincidence? She's since stopped letting her new dogs on the church grounds. None of them are sick.

Call me a nut. I like nuts!

Sushi
"How did you get so round from eating square meals?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not just pesticides...
Posted by: minmotstand on Jun 19, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heavy metals have been implicated by dozens of population-based studies, showing increased risks of Parkinson's disease associated with exposures to metals such as mercury, lead, manganese, aluminum, iron, copper, cadmium, and zinc.

Keep in mind, that the essential trace elements I've mentioned are in their toxic forms after release from industry - e.g. iron (III) and other divalent, trivalent metals.

Excessive intake of required metals such as iron can also become toxic, however.

Industry has been associated with Parkinson's disease in several studies.

Parkinson's disease has been reported as far back as 5,000 years, so pesticides can't be the only thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So some of us
Posted by: osd on Jun 19, 2009 5:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are not surprised by all of this. Enviromental pollution is the same as taking a dump in your glass of water. So why would you do something like that? So why do we pollute the air, water and soil that grows our food. We need this to stay alive, so why do they pollute? Money/greed, why is it that everything always comes down to the seven deadly sins. These were well names, even if your not religous. The more some people get, the more they want. They seem to have lost sight that this Planet is heaven.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

allen
Posted by: pursah on Jun 20, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems only logical. Pesticides are neuro-toxins. They kill by poisoning the nerves of the bugs. People have nerves, too. Pesticides that build-up to critical mass will kill any being that has nerve cells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Obama and the Dems in charge now, the chemical companies will be forced to stop using disease causing chemicals on our foods. Oh, bullshit...who am I kidding?
Welders are also susceptible to Parkinson due to inorganic manganese.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement