Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Secretary Chu Makes $1 Billion Down Payment For More Dirty Coal

By Jeff Biggers, AlterNet. Posted June 15, 2009.


Here are some reasons why funding FutureGen is throwing money at the myth of clean coal.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On the heels of a major Wall Street Journal report that we are reaching "peak coal," and revelations that the Bush administration buried a 2002 report on the cancer risks associated with coal ash, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu made a $1.073 billion down payment today on the construction of FutureGen, "the first commercial scale, fully integrated, carbon capture and sequestration project in the country in Mattoon, Illinois."

Chu's buy-in into "clean coal," a phrase that young liberal Democrat Francis Peabody first used back in the 1890s to peddle his brand of "smoke-free" clean coal in Chicago, places him in the company of FutureGen Alliance promoters like Peabody Energy, whose first quarter 2009 profits "only tripled" this spring -- Peabody celebrated an 8-fold increase in profits in the last quarter of 2008.

A lot of hot air has been emitted on the dangerous oxymoron of "clean coal," but the truth remains that with carbon capture and storage technology still in the experimental phase, Secretary Chu still does not know whether FutureGen's attempt to capture those CO2 emissions and bury them into the earth will be economically feasible, safe (in terms of leaks or accidents or earthquakes) or possible within the next decade.

Which is why Chu is only making a $1.073 billion down payment -- "Following the completion of the detailed cost estimate and fundraising activities, the Department of Energy and the FutureGen Alliance will make a decision either to move forward or to discontinue the project early in 2010."

In the meantime, if we take our eyes off the billowing CO2 emissions for a moment, this is what we do know about "clean coal": FutureGen means we will be extracting even more coal.

Even in the best scenarios, according to most studies, FutureGen-type CCS plants would require increased fuel needs by 25%-40%.

And extracting, transporting and burning MORE coal means MORE dirty and deadly "clean coal" mining, whether it is underground mining, longwall mining, or strip mining (such as mountaintop removal).

Here is the Wall Street Journal's report on "peak coal." Here's the report on the hidden health costs of coal ash.

And here are some clips on the overlooked aspects of "clean coal" rhetoric: black lung disease, which still kills three miners daily; longwall mining, which is devastating Midwestern and Appalachian farms; and mountaintop removal, which has resulted in the destruction of 500 mountains and 1.2 million acres of hardwood forests, and the contamination of watersheds and streams.

Click here to see the video on mountaintop removal and poisoned black waters. Here's one on longwall mining. And below is a video about black lung on the rise:

 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: coal, coal mining, mtr, appalachia

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama's corporate welfare strategy is going full-steam ahead
Posted by: Paul_C on Jun 15, 2009 8:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another bold Obama visionary move - pour $1 billion into his home state of Illinois in an attempt to resuscitate the dirtiest energy source on the planet.

Apparently we are not destroying Midwest America fast enough, so lets put the process on steroids and hope for the worst.

FutureGen, the coal industry's tarbaby, is projected to come in at about twice the cost per KWHr as wind power, assuming of course that it works at all.

Not only is the process highly inefficient, requiring coal mining to be increased 40 percent as stated by the author, but there is the tiny issue of induced earthquakes caused by pumping billions of tons of liquified CO2 deep into the ground.

Those earthquakes, in turn, create the chance that the sequestered CO2 might erupt to the surface, smothering all life for miles around and creating an environmental disaster.

Meanwhile, wind and solar are increasing at an exponential rate, even without guaranteed long term government assistance. Injecting that $1 billion into them would provide immediate payoff with no risk and no environmental impact.

Obama is a sleazy Chicago politician who is selling out the green movement that helped elect him.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Billions for dirty coal,
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jun 16, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dirty wars and dirty banks, and for everyone else, cuts to medicare, medicaid and social security.

I guess Obama didn't get the constituent emails.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement