Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

How Much Has Changed? Obama Administration Deals Series of Anti-Environmental Blows

By Jeffrey St. Clair and Joshua Frank, AlterNet. Posted May 29, 2009.


The Dems have unleashed a slew of anti-environmental policies that would have enraged any reasonable conservationist during the Bush years.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

With little more than 100 days in office, the Democrats, under the leadership of President Barack Obama, have unleashed a slew of anti-environmental policies that would have enraged any reasonable conservationist during the Bush years.

Take the delisting of the gray wolf in the western Great Lakes and parts of the northern Rockies, which was announced during the waning days of the Bush era and upheld by Obama earlier this spring.

About 200 packs of wolves live in the northern Rocky Mountains today. But only 95 of these packs are led by breeding pairs, which is significantly less than half of what most biologists consider to be a healthy number in order to fend off imminent decline and long-term genetic problems for the species.

In Idaho, free-roaming wolves have been radio-collared, allowing their human killers to track and gun them down by helicopter. Freed from the protections of the Endangered Species Act, the state plans to permit hundreds of these wolves to be slaughtered this coming winter. Only a few environmental groups have stepped up in the wolves' defense, with the Center for Biological Diversity, based in Tucson, Ariz., leading the charge.

It's not just the wolf that's been hung out to dry. Shortly after Obama's inauguration, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke announced they were revoking an 11th-hour Bush directive that weakened the ESA listing process.

However, shortly thereafter the Department of the Interior refused to repeal a special rule that would have granted the polar bear protection from the impacts of global warming. Salazar said his agency does not believe the law was intended to address climate change, even though many policy analysts believe the ESA could be used to limit the issuing of permits for development projects that would potentially threaten the polar bear by emitting additional greenhouse gases.

"The Endangered Species Act is not the proper tool to deal with a global issue -- global warming," Salazar said. "We need to move forward with a comprehensive climate change and energy plan we can be proud of."

Apparently federal protection should not be granted if the industry's emissions happen outside the polar bear's natural habitat. The Obama administration, under Salazar's watch, is refusing to lead the way in protecting the bear's dwindling populations. Of course, the oil and gas cartels were unabashedly pleased with the decision. So much for thinking globally and acting locally.

"We welcome the administration's decision because we, like Secretary Ken Salazar, recognize that the Endangered Species Act is not the proper mechanism for controlling our nation's carbon emissions," said American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard. "Instead, we need a comprehensive, integrated energy-and-climate strategy to address this complex, global challenge."

That's not the only recent victory for Big Oil provided by Salazar's office. During one of the most ridiculous episodes of the 2008 presidential campaign, the strange tag-team of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin led their diminutive crowds in spastics of "Drill, baby, drill." Offshore oil drilling and a new generation of nuclear power plants represented the sum total of the McCain/Palin energy plan.

Although it seemed like political comedy at the time, this strategy has now been at least partially embraced by the Obama administration. As the clock approached midnight for the Bush administration, his Interior Department put forward a rule opening 300 million acres of coastal waters to oil drilling. According to the hastily prepared decree, the leasing was to begin by March 23.

Enter Salazar with a maneuver that is typical of the Obama approach to environmental politics: Instead of killing the drilling plan outright, Salazar merely extended the analysis period for six months. The environmental lobby was given a procedural crumb, while the oil hounds still had its long-sought prize on the table for the taking.

Although offshore drilling is so intensely unpopular in coastal states that even former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush stood up to his brother's attempts to expand drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, Salazar, accompanied by a consort of oil lobbyists, held four town hall forums this spring on offshore drilling and left the distinct impression that he was leaning toward what he called a "comprehensive approach" to energy development, in which the oceans will be mined for offshore wind, wave power and, yes, oil.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: environment, obama, epa, jackson, interior, browner, salazar

Jeffrey St. Clair is the author of Been Brown So Long It Looked Like Green to Me: the Politics of Nature and Grand Theft Pentagon. His newest book, Born Under a Bad Sky, is just out from AK Press/CounterPunch books. He can be reached at: sitka@comcast.net. Joshua Frank is co-editor of Dissident Voice and author of Left Out! How Liberals Helped Re-elect George W. Bush (Common Courage Press, 2005), and, along with Jeffrey St. Clair, is the editor of the new book Red State Rebels: Tales of Grassroots Resistance in the Heartland, published by AK Press in July 2008.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Barack Obama: A Progressive Nightmare ...
Posted by: mmckinl on May 29, 2009 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it is not just environmental policy is it ?

Torture and War Crimes not only go unpunished, the very policies Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld initiated are still going on ...

The Afghanistan War is being ramped up ... not wound down and to add insult to injury Cheney's hit squad leader Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal is being put in charge by Obama ...

Real Health Care, single payer, is getting kicked to the curb, protestors "the Baucus 8", being prosecuted like criminals for demanding the representation of the majority of Americans ... Not a peep from Obama ...

Mortgage "Cram Downs" the last hope for real mortgage relief ignored in the Senate and ignored again upon defeat by the Obama "Team".

Banksters getting trillions of dollars of tax payer money and relief through the dumping of toxic assets in the Fed, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FDIC and the FHLBs while Obama declares that we are out of money for states, counties and cities ...

Wake up Progressives! You are being sold down the river politically, morally and economically by "Team Obama".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The next four years: It looks like another long exercise in disappointment
Posted by: pelican beak on May 29, 2009 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article states,"The Endangered Species Act is not the proper tool to deal with a global issue -- global warming... We need to move forward with a comprehensive climate change and energy plan we can be proud of."

I'd reply - "The Obama administration is not the proper team to deal with a global issue -- global warming... we need to move forward with a truly progressive team and plans we can be proud of."
-----------
While others were quick to characterize Obama as a sell-out before he was even inaugurated, based on his nominees for various posts and such, I waited to see in what direction his actual policies once in office would lead. I'm not enamored of the frame-by-frame instant-analysis style of political commentary. It seems too cartoonish. After any election, I wait to see how the opening acts go, what trajectory and arc is actually set, before passing judgment. It's a similar procedural standard of fairness to not declaring a race winner before the starting gun fires, or not writing a movie review before seeing the premier. Some of those here at Alternet, who sit at the edge of their seat reading political tea leaves to forecast the future at the earliest possible moment, jumped to all kinds of wrong conclusions about me for doing so. That seemed cartoonish as well.

I have, and will continue to call my reps' offices on a regular basis to express my views, to tell them what I want done, and what I support. That doesn't change. But the next time I get to vote for anyone is still 17 months off, so I don't feel a need to pass judgment too quickly.

On a broad range of issues, from bushco war crimes and related debris, to spying on citizens, to financial re-organization, to environmental policies and others, it's becoming apparent we have another triangulator in office who won't provide leadership in the bold new directions we need, but will continue to cobble together more stopgap mechanisms from the broken pieces of failed policies readily at hand.

The spirit of hopefulness Obama touted as a nominee is rapidly being beaten into a spirit of continued resignation that we're still being screwed.

It was claimed by some that Obama's young daughters would ensure that he would be forward-looking and pro-active toward future problems. I didn't buy that, either. It seems he now realizes that HIS fortunate daughters will henceforth be privileged, and not have to face the same circumstances the rest of us will.

The only reason for, or context within, I continue to defend the Obama administration (or Nancy Pelosi), is in response to the ridiculous assertions still being made by the laughingstock repugs and their absurdist talking head TV quislings.

Obama ain't getting the job done. So I'm back to my previous concern: what's the most effective way for me to "duck and cover" when the flying brown meets the spinning rotors?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Take refuge in ISRAEL? Are you NUTS? Posted by: pelican beak
Obama Threatens on Health Care ... Now or Never!
Posted by: mmckinl on May 29, 2009 1:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And we have to get it done this year. If we don't get it done this year we are not going to get it done." ~ Obama

Obama Threatens on Health Care ... Now or Never!

Obama is now using scare tactics to sell his BS health insurance scam. Another Plan to indenture Americans by requiring health care payments to corrupt health insurance companies ...

Obama is just another face of oligarchy where average people are debt serfs forever chained to their Imperialist Wealth and War Machine Fascist economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOOLED ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU.FOOL ME TWICE,SHAME ON YOU
Posted by: joeocho88 on May 29, 2009 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YOU IDIOTS THOUGHT THAT YOU WERE WORKING FOR CHANGE...

He fooled me too with his Kennedy-like charisma and eloquence.

His ethnicity meant nothing to me after EIGHT YEARS of ELITES LOOTING OUR ECONOMY and REWARDING their FRIENDS and CRONIES with REAL WARS started by artifice, UNLIMITED ACCESS TO OUT TAX DOLLARS with NO ACCOUNTABILITY and now they are getting ready to add a NEW NATIONAL TAX --a value added tax which means at every stage of production a 25 percent Value Added Tax will be added. WHO DETERMINES WHAT THE PRODUCT IS WORTH BEFORE THE TAX IS ADDED??????
THE SAME OPPRESSORS WHO PUT THE TAXES ON IT.

Blame that noxious talk show host Neil Boortz, a noxious Rush Limbaugh wannabe, attorney and INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CARTEL PAWN...His elitist FAIR TAX will mean hunger, destitution and POVERTY to the rest of us.

NOW NOT ONLY WILL YOU HAVE TO PAY TAXES TO IRS BUT THERE IS A NEW ONE WHICH WILL TAKE EVERYTHING YOU HAVE LEFT! YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY THIS TOO.

ALL TO BENEFIT A RICH BUNCH OF ELITES WHO HAVE RUN OUT OF MONEY TO GAMBLE WITH AND NEED OURS FOR LIQUIDITY.

And all the sheeple can do is have stupid TEA party...instead of lobby their elected leaders expressing their displeasure with them if they support it AND THEN THEY NEED TO VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE so they will be able to come home and confront the results of what they have done to their constituents and see the TRAGEDY FIRST HAND. MAKE THEM UNEMPLOYED!
VOTE THEM OUT!

I should have known that anyone as Oppressive and Evil as this International Banking Cartel would have STILL insist on SERVANTS of AFRICAN ORIGINS...

Condaleeza Rice was Bush's Secretary of State supposedly and now we have Barack SADDAM Obama.
And I almost forgot the BIG HOUSEMAN, Collin Powell... pronounced same as the large intestine...

And all of the African Americans who are applauding Obama's every move because he is "Black like me!" Not quite. Check out his family and how he grew up -- NOT like most African Americans... His father was African aristocracy and his mother was White aristocracy... NOT like YOU and NOT like ME

Looks like not only African Americans are going to be enslaved but ALL of us...

Obama was just a Judas Goat is seemed.

I had so much hope and I did not want to believe it..I believed him.

And because of the Korea Crisis, he is talking about bringing back THE DRAFT --that means enslavement of the male populace to become cannon fodder for the New World Order to keep down the population...

WE ARE GOING TO GET CHANGE ALL RIGHT -- ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE 1930s...and if NORTH KOREA DROPS THEIR PAYLOAD ON US...maybe all the way back to the STONE AGE.

Should make a lot of conservative who long for the GOOD OLD DAYS VERRRRRY HAPPY... and for the idiotic fellow travelers who wanted the triumph of Communism, you guys will be seeing the BIG FLASH and DYING with the REST of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Paradigm Shift, at Long Last!
Posted by: DrBrian on May 29, 2009 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amidst all the gloomy news and profound disappointments, I've noticed a trend. Until a few months ago, everyone blamed the Republicans. Now that the Democrats hold power, some fools still cling to illusions while more and more people awaken to the realization that things haven't changed. The third step will be the realization that the only way we will get meaningful change is to elect leaders from alternative parties, to have true multiparty democracy, to get rid of the corrupt Beltway insiders once and for all.

The first step in creating change will be to support Green candidates in the 2010 congressional races, especially the House. If they can capture enough seats to deny the Democrats an absolute majority, they'll be in a position to force concessions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Paradigm Shift, at Long Last! Posted by: abstractedaway
» RE: A Paradigm Shift, at Long Last! Posted by: oregoncharles
Pure and simple —
Posted by: DJC11 on May 29, 2009 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is fraud. I want my vote back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are all the Obamabots?
Posted by: cmaciain on May 29, 2009 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm disappointed. Where are Beck, Tom Degan, and all the Obamabots explaining their Savior's latest betrayals? I want to see their convoluted logic in this--how can they defend this man? And where is PurpleGirl, hater of Hillary--you know, the woman who is granted equal rights to gays in the state department? Notice Obama merely makes jokes at the expense of GLBT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm disappointed too Posted by: Drclaw
A new slogan
Posted by: jsong123 on May 29, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"the pipeline of federal subsidies that has kept the industry alive since Three Mile Island."

No basis for this was given. Maybe we will hear more about it sometime, from the slogan repeaters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Administration if Moving Fast
Posted by: Southern Gal on May 29, 2009 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just look at how much Obama has accomplished while he's been in office this short time. It's scary to think what else he will do before this 4 year term if over. The new boss is the same as the old boss and he's not looking out for us common folk until the next election comes around and he needs out campaign finance support and our vote. It's not what you say but what you do that counts, really. So much for change that matters. Our constitution, our Bill of Rights, our civil liberties, our right to affordable and safe healthcare, our rights to clean air, clean water,to safe food, meaningful and affordable education, our oblitation to protect our environment, and the list goes on. Put aside the rhetoric and let us see some action to protect and care for these important things that make our lives meaningful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Did you hear? Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» We Do Not Have Rights Posted by: mgmyers79
I'm giving up voting
Posted by: wireup on May 29, 2009 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I voted for Obama and I've noticed the same thing. Democrats back-tracking, morphing into BushCo and the GOP.

I GIVE UP!!!!

In this country, it is either the Democrats or the GOP. Third parties don't have a chance in hell of winning anything - not even for dog catcher.

There is NO point in voting any more and I don't intend to do so any longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Now, THAT's wasting a vote. Posted by: oregoncharles
money/economy first
Posted by: sirios on May 29, 2009 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money has NO intrinsic value, so to place it at the top of the heap of importance assures the collapse of the environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Salazars Hat
Posted by: adelaney on May 29, 2009 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone should shove that ugly hat he wears up salazar's fat arse!

What a greedy human salazar is with no compassion for other species' welfare.

I suppose that is how obama feels too. Grrr!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why isn't this article properly credited?
Posted by: oregoncharles on May 29, 2009 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw it days ago on Counterpunch, where St.Clair is co-editor. Yet not a breath of credit to the website that originated it!

It's bad enough that so many websites depend on collecting material they don't pay for, but at least it gets more exposure. Not giving credit to your source creates a real injury!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old deadly combination of factors
Posted by: willymack on May 29, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greed, crooked politics and politicians, unrestrained population growth, and indifference and apathy are all to blame for the mess we're in. One more factor is obsolete thinking, and this is the worst of all. It comes in many forms, and it represents everything we SHOULDN'T be doing any more:
We shouldn't be polluting any more, but still do.
We should be limiting (or even eliminating) our population growth, but aren't.
We should end the credit economy and stress living within our means, but won't.
We should be making heroic efforts to educate our children, but continue to drag our feet.
We should end the burning of ANYTHING (except maybe hydrogen) for energy and propulsion, but can't because the "energy" companies won't let us.
We should break the shackles corporate America has put on us, but won't even acknowlege the fact, let alone DO anything about it.
We should, in all our numbers and voices, condemn the state of endless, phony wars we're bogged down in, and demand an immediate end to it all, but that would mean taking the power away from war profiteers, and we won't.
We should demand our elected officials live up to their oaths of office, but they won't. Too much money in (crooked) politics.
Where will all this take us? Are you sure you want to see?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» With a new hope Posted by: mgmyers79
NOW can I vote for Ralph Nader?
Posted by: stigo391 on May 29, 2009 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We Nader voters totally predicted this stuff. The Democrats called us spoilers and told us we should vote for Obama and then hold his feet to the fire once we get him in office.

I'm sending out my "I told you so" letters now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pollyanna Posted by: inverse_agonist
Ford Foundation front groups are so full of it.
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on May 29, 2009 12:43 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who do you think you're fooling?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WAAAAAY off on biomass.
Posted by: -matti on May 29, 2009 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of this article is good and right on. But the Authors are totally mistaken about biomass electric/heat generation.

Combined with sustainable forestry practices, a current generation biomass plant can significantly reduce carbon emmissions (compared to older energy generating techniques) while actually improving forest health -and therefore improving it as a carbon sink.

Also, biomass is far from being limited to only trees. Almost any plant and even animal waste material can be used (potentially). In Finland, much of the biomass generation comes from otherwise polluting and destructive pulp liquor waste.

New developments in "biochar" -biomass burnt in a low-oxygen process that releases almost no CO2 and leaves a highly stable soil-improving charcoal as a byproduct- have the potential to make some biomass plants carbon NEGATIVE. Even current "gasifier" technology can cut Nitrogen emissions drastically, reduce Carbon emissions below net, and eliminate Sulphur emissions altogether.

Biomass electric/heat generation is one of the few truly "sustainable" energy-generating techniques in the World. This includes many of the newly re-popular "alternative" techniques like Photo-Voltaic Cell systems -which of course relies on plastics, rare metals, and climate/weather conditions. It is also site and use flexible, because the specific fuel can be changed between different generators and at any given generator, as well as the electric/heat output altered to suit changing demand.

Managed effectively, bio-energy can significantly reduce and even ameliorate both toxic chemical and gas (CO2, etc.) pollution from industry, reduce or nearly eliminate waste from agricuture and food-processing, improve forest health and thereby improve natural cabon capture and help long-term biodiversity, and provide well-paying technical and skilled/semi-skilled labor jobs (non-university degree jobs) that will reduce personal debt and improve communities. All this while simultaneously providing sustainable electric, heat, and even fertilzer and biofuel generation for the next several thousand years or more (depending mostly on the availability and recycle-ability of the metals involved in the machines and transmission lines). It should definitly be a prominent part of our multi-pronged approach to a sustainable human living system.

Why in the world would any person who calls themselves an "enviromentalist" or a "progressive" be against that?

But of course, why would anyone think that sad pictures of polar bears would stop industrial and automotive carbon emissions?

Ugh.

It is high time for environmentalists to drop the "pristine wilderness" and "species protection" concepts. One is almost entirely based on a mistaken impression the first Europeans in the Americas had of the natives, the other on a mistaken belief that people can only understand nature as a form of zoo. What matters is biodiversity and ecological balance.

Have fun,

-matti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Kennedy Jr. for senior cabinet post!
Posted by: LoveAlex59 on May 29, 2009 2:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the nonsense talk about Caroline Kennedy getting this post or that senate seat was nauseating especially when the Kennedy they should have been pushing was Robert Jr. He should have been appointed to head the EPA in the Obama administration! With him at the head they would not be getting away with the crap they are doing now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Genuinely sorry for the Obama supporters
Posted by: patriot_vt on May 29, 2009 5:22 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know that there were MILLIONS of people, including many of my friends and relatives that thought they were really voting for a change. After 8 years of Bush, almost any alternative looked good, yet here we are. Still involved in 2 major wars, still bailing out banks and big financial institutions and driving our budget deficit to astronomical levels. Even more disturbing is the new administration's endorsement of the same radical theories of executive power (state secrets, espionage, military tribunals, and indefinite detention) as the Bush administration. Now the Obama EPA is approving the destruction of another 40 mountain tops for the purpose of coal mining? How utterly depressing.

As you might well know, there are millions of right/libertarian-leaning folks who were similarly dejected by the insane policies of the Bush administration. Now that we've had a taste of Democratic leadership and found it to be not all that different from the Republicans, PRINCIPLED people on the right and the left should unite to move our country in a new direction.

Can we not agree on the issues of civil liberties, non-militaristic foreign policy, and an end to corporate bailouts and crony capitalism??? If we can, I really think there are sufficient numbers of people of whatever basic political persuasion to bring about REAL change.

Don't "give up" on your activism just because we've gotten rid of Bush. There are plenty of organizations out there still promoting peace, civil liberties and other worthy causes. Join up with your fellow citizens and help drive a new political agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No third parties Posted by: mgmyers79
END POLARIZING STRATEGY
Posted by: kparcell on May 31, 2009 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've now spent a lifetime on these issues, and I've come to the conclusion that we've been on the wrong tack. The fact is that the way our resources become degraded is that local communities are unable to defend them. Mountaintops are removed by wealthy corporations only where local communities lack the economic clout to stop them. Wolves are hunted down where the broader community is effectively a company town involved in unsustainable agriculture and by individual ranchers who can't afford the economic cost of the wolves' survival. Coal power plants are erected in poor communities, and they deliver their dirty energy to those in communities with few or no clean energy options.

But no one chops down the trees on my street because our community has the prosperity to protect its human and other natural resources. There are no outfall pipes in our waterways, no sweatshops in our industrial park. We can argue til the end of time about the meaning of "sustainable" but we agree with ease about "unsustainable". And yet at the same time we thrive by exploiting poor communities elsewhere.

So here we are - in the blink of an eye either 10 billion people will share this small blue marble sustainably, or our life-supporting systems will collapse like a house of cards. Clearly what we must have to preserve our priceless diversity of species and culture is sustainable prosperity available to every community. But instead progressive movements have expended their resources fighting over the meaning of "sustainable" with those who represent economic prosperity. The result is we have slowly defeated ourselves with a lose-lose strategy.

Clearly, we must now come together to accomplish an economic revolution that empowers everyone to protect this planet, creating a level, sustainable playing field globally for business. We do this and prosper, or we don't and perish. We can continue to strive for a benevolent global totalitarian authority to regulate every aspect of our lives and witness the end of our world as we strive. Or imagine a revolution with no enemies: Imagine a world where every community controls its essential resources and generates its own energy, so that the wealth involved in sustainable commerce stays local and empowers communities - every community, everywhere.

Please visit SunMoney to learn more about sustainable prosperity for all, and network with me to create it now.

http://sunmoney.org
http://www.facebook.com/people/Kevin-Parcell/1392977680

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ND POLARIZING STRATEGY Posted by: willduquebec
Hey...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jun 2, 2009 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I TOLD you so...

I mean THINK, people! No one, not even an African American Senator gets the nod to be party standard bearer if they aren't at heart basically pro status quo capitalists. Where do you think you live?

We are all collectively screwed. The planet isn't going to wait til people like that finally have to admit that maybe there really is something to the connection between business as usual and global climate change... it's just going to go on changing until it is no longer a place habitable by humans or anything we know in the way of life forms. Congratulations!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scam and Trade
Posted by: Urgelt on Jun 2, 2009 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cap and Trade is beloved by industry and the financial markets alike. Because it's ripe for scamming the public and skimming profits.

If the administration were serious about regulating carbon emissions, all it would have to do is tax them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$40,000 man, woman and child
Posted by: luther6 on Jun 2, 2009 3:44 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$40,000 for every man, woman, and child in the United States. That's what they could have sent us with the money they gave away to Wall Street fat cats who caused this recession. That puts it into perspective, doesn't it. Imagine your local economy when you were paying your bills and spending that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think globally, act locally
Posted by: willduquebec on Jun 5, 2009 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My advice based on my experience of sustainability is to start to act locally with the power you hold in your very hands. Thank to liberty of talk, reunion and democracy, this power is real... and how powerfull when you fully use it! You won't change the world acting localy, but you will change YOUR world, as long as after talkin' the talk, you start walking the walk. As an engaged citizen, using uncompremised leadership, integrity, working in groups decuplate your power. Volunteering and educating the population is really important to, it's called participatory democracy, wich I think we don't use enough in our modern era. The environnemental crisis is not a technological crisis, it is a human one. Cars don't drive themselves, people do. Even people who pretend being environnementalist...

I have been working with this approach for years now, and I have done a GREAT deal of change around me. Just for example, I convinced 20 restaurants of recycling and starting to install energy saving devices... And that's JUST a small part of what I did to promote sustainability and change things around me.

And remember everyone, buying, is voting. Get involved. Should I repeat it, get involved!!!

William, 22.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be the change, to wait for Barack
Posted by: willduquebec on Jun 5, 2009 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My advice based on my experience of sustainability is to start to act locally with the power you hold in your very hands. Thank to liberty of talk, reunion and democracy, this power is real... and how powerfull when you fully use it! You won't change the world acting localy, but you will change YOUR world, as long as after talkin' the talk, you start walking the walk. As an engaged citizen, using uncompremised leadership, integrity, working in groups decuplate your power. Volunteering and educating the population is really important to, it's called participatory democracy, wich I think we don't use enough in our modern era. The environnemental crisis is not a technological crisis, it is a human one. Cars don't drive themselves, people do. Even people who pretend being environnementalist...

I have been working with this approach for years now, and I have done a GREAT deal of change around me. Just for example, I convinced 20 restaurants of recycling and starting to install energy saving devices... And that's JUST a small part of what I did to promote sustainability and change things around me.

And remember everyone, buying, is voting. Get involved. Should I repeat it, get involved!!!

William, 22.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement