COMMENTS: 2
Green to the Grave: Eco-Friendly Burials Catching On
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
"The U.K. put green burial on the map," said Joe Sehee, who is widely credited with doing the same thing in the U.S. when he founded the Green Burial Council in 2002.
The trend has not escaped the attention of the death care industry, which believes going green could be critical to its own survival. "Green funerals are an emerging alternative to the funeral services we're used to providing," notes the association Web site. And while there are differing points of view over things like the best way to ensure burial sites are permanently preserved and whether to allow the burial of any embalmed bodies, observers see the trend line pointing up.
Sehee, whose Santa Fe-based council is working to produce a set of standards and operating procedures for natural burial sites, believes the movement is gaining momentum "more quickly than any of us anticipated."
By 1998, the first such U.S. site had already opened at Ramsey Creek, S.C. Today, he said, there are about 20 of these areas with another 30 or so in the pipeline and expected to come "online within a year." While the rate of green burials has not been measured, proponents feel the curve will resemble that of cremation, which after a slow start in 1876 has grown dramatically since the "cremation boom" started in 1963.
Mary Woodsen is president of the board of trustees of Greensprings Natural Cemetery Preserve, which opened in 2006 and remains the only natural burial ground in New York state. She links the rise of natural burials to baby boomers, the post-war generation that she says embraced "natural childbirth, home schooling and natural foods."
"We now have cradle-to-grave options for natural living, and we're taking care of the grave end of it," she says. "People want their choices in death to reflect their choices in life."
According to the NFDA, funerals average around $7,000 with perhaps another $3,000 for a plot and cemetery-related costs. Cremation typically costs significantly less, while natural burials tend to be even cheaper: Greensprings charges $750 for a lot, plus $600 for opening and closing the grave. As the economic downturn tightens its grip, Sehee says people feel bad about blowing $4,000 on a box that they are going to use for two days and then bury. However, he senses stronger social and philosophical forces at work than just economics.
"I believe what we're seeing is a paradigm shift in death care. We have been impeding the natural cycle with sealed caskets, burial vaults and bodies full of chemicals. Green burial also invites people to participate in a way conventional burial does not."
Lisa Auble agrees. She's a funeral director in Lansing, close to Greensprings, where she has helped with about 20 natural burials. "It's how the early burials were," she says. "Very simple, very natural, very moving."
These sea changes in burial practices come at a time when U.S. death rates are steadily climbing -- provisional figures from the National Center for Health Statistics shows 2,449,000 deaths for the year ending July 2008. This compares with a provisional figure of 2,415,000 for 2007 and a final tally of 2,426,264 for 2006.
And as natural burial begins to elbow its way into the mainstream, those in the death care business are starting to adopt green practices and work with families wanting an eco-friendly final journey for their loved ones.
"I think they're coming to see this as an extension of their core business and not so much as a threat," Sehee says. "This is not a way to circumvent the death care industry. We want to green up the whole industry. What we don't want is for it to become a marketing gimmick."
Results from two recent surveys -- one in 2007 by AARP and one last year by funeral industry publishers Kates-Boylston Publications -- suggest only limited awareness of green or natural burials but a willingness to find out more and consider the option.
The Green Burial Council is about raising awareness and giving people choices while addressing the practical issues surrounding natural burial sites. "A lot of dots have to be connected," says Sehee.
"Our standards are evolving, and they should be. We don't claim to have all the answers."
Embalming with formaldehyde temporarily preserves and sanitizes a body. However, NFDA spokesman Michael Krill, who owns three funeral homes in Ohio, says it's a family choice, not a legal necessity, and only in rare circumstances is it officially required.
Formaldehyde is potentially dangerous for those handling it and for its effects once in the soil. Dr. Michael J. Thun, vice president emeritus of epidemiology and surveillance research at the American Cancer Society, says these risks have been researched since the 1970s. In a 2006, after reviewing numerous health-related studies, the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that formaldehyde is carcinogenic.
However, environmental objections to embalming may be muted by the use of new products such as nontoxic "ecobalming" chemicals being made by The Champion Company, of Springfield, Ohio, using a mix of natural plant extracts.
Other steps are also being taken to green up the death care industry. Mark Allen, executive director of the Casket & Funeral Supply Association of America, says several companies now offer biodegradable caskets. Materials being used here or in the U.K. include cardboard, willow, sea grass, banana leaf and bamboo.
Similarly, the Cremation Association of North America is investigating better filtration systems to reduce emissions while improving fuel and energy consumption, says association board member and environmental adviser, Paul Rahill.
In addition, he says, a flameless bio-cremation process is under commercial development. Alkaline hydrolysis combines caustic soda, water, heat and pressure to dissolve a body, leaving behind a syrupy waste liquid and a similar residue as cremation.
Yet another high-tech solution, from a company in Sweden called Promessa Organic, could eventually replace all current burial and cremation methods by deep-freezing the body and submerging it in liquid nitrogen. Vibration then turns the brittle remains into a fine powder that is dehydrated and any metal residue removed. The remains can then be kept or disposed of like ashes.
As Kastenbaum wrote, "Beneath our whiz-bang, cybernetic, palm-pilot daily whirl we still have much in common with those who confronted death long before history found an enduring voice. Our orientation must somehow take into account both the distinctive characteristics of life in the early twenty-first century and our continuing bonds with all who have experienced the loss of loved ones. ... We can recognize that the funeral process offers an opportunity to reach deep into our understanding and values."
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: westomoon on May 26, 2009 6:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the article also brought to mind some odd thoughts:
How green are our corpses? I've been eating and living as organically as possible for 20 years now, and I still wouldn't trust my corpse not to pollute any site where it was planted. Are there qualification criteria for the imposition of human corpses on natural sites? If not, maybe we should require green burials to include a selected group of mycelia in the grave to cope with the toxins our bodies will release.
Where will all these green graveyards come from? As there are more and more and more of us, as we bulldoze more and more farmland for housing, where will we find the space for all these green graves -- national parks? I also had a wonderful notion of, say, Wyoming being completely given over to nothing but windfarms and graves. I mean, it's not good for much else -- and overpopulation will never be a problem there. It'd be a nice "thank you" to the State that gave us Darth Cheney, too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dsmidwest on May 27, 2009 12:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's no good solution for eco-burial that I can see except to find ways to contain the pollution from cremation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: westomoon on May 26, 2009 6:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the article also brought to mind some odd thoughts:
How green are our corpses? I've been eating and living as organically as possible for 20 years now, and I still wouldn't trust my corpse not to pollute any site where it was planted. Are there qualification criteria for the imposition of human corpses on natural sites? If not, maybe we should require green burials to include a selected group of mycelia in the grave to cope with the toxins our bodies will release.
Where will all these green graveyards come from? As there are more and more and more of us, as we bulldoze more and more farmland for housing, where will we find the space for all these green graves -- national parks? I also had a wonderful notion of, say, Wyoming being completely given over to nothing but windfarms and graves. I mean, it's not good for much else -- and overpopulation will never be a problem there. It'd be a nice "thank you" to the State that gave us Darth Cheney, too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dsmidwest on May 27, 2009 12:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's no good solution for eco-burial that I can see except to find ways to contain the pollution from cremation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




