ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 3

Why Obama Should Take Notes from Cuba on a Green Energy Revolution

Cuba has successfully greened its energy sector over the last few years, and is now exporting its energy revolution.
May 26, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Barack Obama has proposed to invest $150 billion in renewable energy and energy efficiency over the next ten years. He need look no further than La Havana for inspiration. Cuba has successfully greened its energy sector over the last few years, and is now exporting its energy revolution. Will we soon benefit from Cuban expertise in cleaning up the US energy sector?

Just a few years ago, Cuba was plagued by frequent power blackouts – the result of inefficient generation in outdated thermal power plants, large transmission losses, and wasteful consumption. In 2006, the government responded to the power crisis by launching its "Revolución Energética." "We are not waiting for fuel to fall from the sky," Fidel Castro said at the time, "because we have discovered, fortunately, something much more important: energy conservation, which is like finding a great oil deposit." Laurie Guevara-Stone of Solar Energy International summarizes the impressive results of this energy revolution in the April issue of Renewable Energy World Magazine.

Cuba’s electricity utility has wasted no time in exploiting the "oil deposit" of conservation. According to Guevara-Stone, it mobilized consumers to replace more than 9 million incandescent light bulbs – almost 100% of the bulbs used in the country -- with compact fluorescents within six months. Under the utility’s program, more than 2 million energy-efficient refrigerators, 1 million fans, 182,000 air conditioners and 260,000 water pumps were sold.

The Ministry of Education has run a creative educational campaign on energy conservation since 1997. The state-run media cover renewable energy and energy conservation in a weekly television show, tv ads and news articles. The country’s 13,000 social workers contributed to the revolution by visiting homes, exchanging light bulbs, and educating consumers about energy conservation.

Where education is not sufficient, a revised tariff structure strongly discourages wasteful consumption. If consumers use less than 100 kWh of electricity per month, they pay the very low lifeline tariff of 0.4 US cents/kWh. The rate rises steeply with consumption, and reaches 5.4 US cents/kWh for consumers using more than 300 kWh per month.

To ramp up generation, the government built two wind farms and is currently installing 100 additional wind measuring stations. It also built a grid-connected solar electric plant and 180 micro-hydro power plants, and expanded the capacity of the country’s biogas facilities (mainly in the sugar sector).

Cuba has promoted renewable energy for off-grid electrification for many years. In the meantime, 8000 solar electric systems have been installed to electrify all schools, health clinics and social centers in the country, and many residential buildings. Cuba is adding 300 biogas plants which are based on animal waste this year, and plans to electrify the remaining 100,000 houses that have no access to electricity with renewable energy.

Finally, Cuba tackled the transmission losses by upgrading transmission cables, electrical posts and meters. By installing close to 2,000 diesel- and fuel-based micro-power plants, the country also eliminated the need for transmission to many communities altogether.
The Revolución Energética made power blackouts, which in 2004 and 2005 hit the country almost every day, a thing of the past. According to the UN’s Human Development Index (HDI), Cubans consumed an average 1,380 kWh of electricity per capita in 2007/08 -- more than ten times less than US consumers. Guevara-Stone points out that Cuba is the world’s only country which has achieved high human development (according to the HDI) without an unsustainable ecological footprint (as measured by the Living Planet index).

Just as Cuba is exporting doctors and teachers, the country also sends renewable energy experts abroad. Cuban technicians and scientists have installed solar panels and provided advice on energy efficiency in countries such as Bolivia, Honduras, Lesotho, Mali, Nigeria, South Africa and Venezuela. The country’s social workers have installed more than 2 million energy efficient light bulbs in homes in Haiti.

Cuba has won international recognition for its rural electrification programs for many years, for example by receiving the UN’s Global 500 award in 2001. In April 2007, UNEP executive director Achim Steiner praised the country’s energy revolution. He commented that "in terms of a short term response, it is quite remarkable how Cuba, under its economic conditions, managed to solve [the energy] crisis." At a news conference in Havana, Steiner added that "Cuba can look proudly at having solved a short-term crisis with a long-term commitment toward cleaner energy," and that UNEP wanted to "put a spotlight on Cuba's efforts."


Peter Bosshard is the policy director of International Rivers. His blog is Wet, Wild and Wonky.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: obama, renewable energy, cuba, green energy


Comments are closed-

zak
Posted by: zeq2m9 on May 26, 2009 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had no idea Cuba was so progressive with energy conservation. We could learn a thing or two from them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Wishing on a dream
Posted by: tsmith144000 on May 26, 2009 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These types of measures would be pretty easy to mandate & enforce in a non-democratic society. It would be nice (extremely) to implement them here, but if we can't get our neighbors to stop throwing Happy Meal trash out of their car windows and start recycling, it's wishful thinking. Sorry to sound pessimistic, but 6 YEARS! I'll keep my fingers crossed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Roger
Posted by: RogerV on May 27, 2009 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An interesting article but it does no reflect reality in Cuba. It’s a good idea to give sound examples of conservative energy consumption but to attempt to apply this model to the US would be absurd.



First off the average Cuban home only has a few light bulbs, normally not more than 1 to a room and these are generally low wattage bulbs inadequate for reading under. Electricity and fuel has always been expensive in Cuba and the people have managed to the high cost. Florescent bulbs as obnoxious as they are will not make a major dent in the home market in any country. However in Cuba though the fluorescent conversion program sounds voluntary it’s not. Social pressure is brought to bear on those who do not comply. Actually it’s often more than just social pressure. A person could well miss out on educational opportunities, health care and job opportunities if not in compliance with the “norm”.



Awarding those who use less electricity with a low per watt consumption cost simply forces the poorer to seek alternative solutions such as bunker fuel to cook with. Many of the Cuban kitchens I visited had electric stoves but they were seldom used. The norm was a sort of primus stove running on a very low grade of fuel which gave off black smoke and made life miserable for those who had any sort of asthma or respiratory challenges.



Many of us keep holding up Cuba as some sort of educational and health care paradise, now amplified by a Green Revolution. Yes, the concepts are stellar but the implementation sucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

zak
Posted by: zeq2m9 on May 26, 2009 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had no idea Cuba was so progressive with energy conservation. We could learn a thing or two from them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Wishing on a dream
Posted by: tsmith144000 on May 26, 2009 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These types of measures would be pretty easy to mandate & enforce in a non-democratic society. It would be nice (extremely) to implement them here, but if we can't get our neighbors to stop throwing Happy Meal trash out of their car windows and start recycling, it's wishful thinking. Sorry to sound pessimistic, but 6 YEARS! I'll keep my fingers crossed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Roger
Posted by: RogerV on May 27, 2009 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An interesting article but it does no reflect reality in Cuba. It’s a good idea to give sound examples of conservative energy consumption but to attempt to apply this model to the US would be absurd.



First off the average Cuban home only has a few light bulbs, normally not more than 1 to a room and these are generally low wattage bulbs inadequate for reading under. Electricity and fuel has always been expensive in Cuba and the people have managed to the high cost. Florescent bulbs as obnoxious as they are will not make a major dent in the home market in any country. However in Cuba though the fluorescent conversion program sounds voluntary it’s not. Social pressure is brought to bear on those who do not comply. Actually it’s often more than just social pressure. A person could well miss out on educational opportunities, health care and job opportunities if not in compliance with the “norm”.



Awarding those who use less electricity with a low per watt consumption cost simply forces the poorer to seek alternative solutions such as bunker fuel to cook with. Many of the Cuban kitchens I visited had electric stoves but they were seldom used. The norm was a sort of primus stove running on a very low grade of fuel which gave off black smoke and made life miserable for those who had any sort of asthma or respiratory challenges.



Many of us keep holding up Cuba as some sort of educational and health care paradise, now amplified by a Green Revolution. Yes, the concepts are stellar but the implementation sucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS