ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 27

Corporate Agriculture Is to Blame for the Hundreds of Thousands of Farmer Suicides in India

Vandana Shiva says industrial agriculture has left Indian farmers indebted and destitute, and explains how to stem the tide of suicides.
May 20, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Last month, the world got a glimpse of an epidemic that has hit India in the last decade when news reports alerted readers to the suicides of 1,500 farmers in the Indian state of Chattisgarh.

But this has been only a fraction of the suicides committed by farmers since 1997, says Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., a physicist, environmentalist, feminist, science policy advocate and director of Navdanya and the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology.

While initial news reports blamed the recent suicides on falling water levels, Shiva explains that the suicide epidemic in India is a lot more complicated and far-reaching.

"Rapid increase in indebtedness is at the root of farmers' taking their lives," she wrote recently. "Debt is a reflection of a negative economy. Two factors have transformed agriculture from a positive economy into a negative economy for peasants: the rising of costs of production and the falling prices of farm commodities. Both these factors are rooted in the policies of trade liberalization and corporate globalization."

At the heart of this is a circle of indebtedness that has resulted from the so-called Green Revolution, which exported industrial agricultural practices to places like India and in doing so, made seeds, a once-renewable resource for farmers, into something that had be bought from corporations.

"In 1998, the World Bank's structural-adjustment policies forced India to open up its seed sector to global corporations like Cargill, Monsanto and Syngenta," Shiva wrote. "The global corporations changed the input economy overnight. Farm-saved seeds were replaced by corporate seeds, which need fertilizers and pesticides and cannot be saved. ... The shift from saved seed to corporate monopoly of the seed supply also represents a shift from biodiversity to monoculture in agriculture."

In an interview with AlterNet, Shiva explained how Monsanto’s Bt cotton has exemplified what can go wrong with industrial agriculture; what happens to farming communities when traditional farming methods are replaced by corporate sponsored mono-cropping; and how to stem the tide of farmer suicides.

Tara Lohan: Farmer suicides in India recently made the news when stories broke last month about 1,500 farmers taking their own lives, what do you attribute these deaths to?

Vandana Shiva: Over the last decade, 200,000 farmers have committed suicide. The 1,500 figure is for the state of Chattisgarh. In Vidharbha, 4,000 are committing suicide annually. This is the region where 4 million acres of cotton have been grown with Monsanto's Bt cotton. The suicides are a direct result of a debt trap created by ever-increasing costs of seeds and chemicals and constantly falling prices of agricultural produce.

When Monsanto's Bt cotton was introduced, the seed costs jumped from 7 rupees per kilo to 17,000 rupees per kilo. Our survey shows a thirteenfold increase in pesticide use in cotton in Vidharbha. Meantime, the $4 billion subsidy given to U.S. agribusiness for cotton has led to dumping and depression of international prices.

Squeezed between high costs and negative incomes, farmers commit suicide when their land is being appropriated by the money lenders who are the agents of the agrichemical and seed corporations. The suicides are thus a direct result of industrial globalized agriculture and corporate monopoly on seeds.

TL: Suicides of Indian farmers unfortunately is not news -- how long has this been a problem, how serious is the problem, what are the underlying causes?

VS: The first suicide that we studied took place in Warrangal in Andhra Pradesh in 1997. This region is a rain-fed dry region and used to grow dry land crops such as millets, pigeon pea etc. In 1997, the seed corporations converted the region from biodiverse agriculture to monocultures of cotton hybrid. The farmers were not told they would need irrigation. They were not told that they would need fertilizers and pesticides. They were not told they could not save the seeds. The cotton seeds were sold as "White Gold," with a false promise that farmers would become millionaires. Instead, the farmers landed in severe unpayable debt. This is how the suicides began.

TL: You said that 200,000 farmers have ended their lives since 1997 -- where does that statistic come from? Are there numbers to compare suicide rates for farmers pre-Green Revolution with the numbers we are seeing today?

VS: The statistics on farmers suicides are kept by the National Crime Bureau. Since there were no large-scale suicides prior to 1997, the statistics was not maintained before that. The combination of the spread of nonrenewable seeds and globalized trade has triggered the epidemic of suicides.


Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email


Comments are closed-

corporate crime is cold-blooded crime formulated by people sitting in conference rooms
Posted by: Suzon on May 21, 2009 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The farmers were not told they would need irrigation. They were not told that they would need fertilizers and pesticides. They were not told they could not save the seeds. The cotton seeds were sold as "White Gold," with a false promise that farmers would become millionaires.

This is deception and concealment, the elements of corporate fraud.

Corporations are monarchist in origin, anti-democratic and anti-American. The rebels may have won the War of Independence and the War of 1812, but the corrupt monarchists prevailed and flourished.

The Norman-English dynasty still in power today in its former colonies is not the sole source of human suffering but it's a reliable one. Unfortunately, India is still being victimized by it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It is terrible.
Posted by: livinglight on May 21, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I see the headlines about how dangerous H1N1 is, and how few who have died from the flu, and compare with 200000 farmers who have commit suicide, I can see that 50000 farmers life = one life lost by the flu.

It is not understandable that the world accept this. I hope you understand my words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Stuffed and Starved, by Raj Patel
Posted by: artie on May 21, 2009 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This book by Patel argues the same points as the article.... the rampant evil of it all ....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Just Another Off-the-Wall Alternet Bit of Nonsense
Posted by: rcase on May 21, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When my father was growing corn 75 years ago his corn yielded 50 bushels to the acre. Now farmers expect 200 bushels to the acre. If we were still producing 50 bushels to the acre the world would have controlled its population simply by starvation. But behold, this article says that the ability to feed the world is a bad thing and we trace the badness to seed companies that produce the seed. There is no question farm policies are a mess. A little over 50 years ago I worked for ASC selling the government's program to inhibit oversupply by paying farmers not to grow corn. My area was Amish country. I found myself having to defend the undefendable. The simple question was: aren't there hungry people in the world? And yet our government wants us not to grow corn? Why not grow the corn and give it to hungry people? My answers varied from maintaining markets to how free food would destroy the livlihood of overseas farmers, to how the government knows best and you people don't. Farmers in underdeveloped countries could increase their productivity several times over without having to purchase fertilizers and agribusiness seed corn. There are marvelous stories of missionaries and agricultural ambassadors who have helped this to happen. That is where the emphasis should be, not on a hysterical rant about agribusiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Just a bit of oversimplification. Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

Monsanto - A Malignant Monster
Posted by: fmajor7 on May 21, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I first heard about GM seeds from Monsanto and watched a rather shocking documentary made in Germany by German farmers. To find out more about the havoc Monsanto had been causing the world over I did a quick search in Youtube and absolutely amazed with the number of even more shocking facts about Monsanto. I get the feeling that they want to own the World's total food chain !
Please look at :

http://tinyurl.com/malignant-monsanto

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Distortions as Usual
Posted by: D_Hudson on May 21, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meantime, the $4 billion subsidy given to U.S. agribusiness for cotton has led to dumping and depression of international prices.

First of all, it is very hard to distinguish where subsidies go. But, more importantly, India provides a support price to cotton in India that exceeds the U.S. target price for cotton. In addition, through input subsidies that are not counted in the Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) used by the world trade organization, India subsidizes its agricultural sector to the tune of 15-30% more than U.S. agriculture. There is much to be debated about agricultural policy globally, but providing false information to the public is not helpful.

See source for details on India's subsidy policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What a strange business model.
Posted by: jgilb on May 21, 2009 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Horrible Monsanto. They sold seeds to the farmers knowing that they would fail and commit suicide.

That's a strange business model, because Monsanto makes money by selling new seeds to the farmers each year and if their customers are killing themselves, repeat business would be down.

Is it possible that the farmer's ignorance of basic agricultural techniques might be at the root of the cause. Didn't think the crops would need water and fertilizer ? Didn't know that hybrids seeds cannot be replanted each year ? I'm not a farmer and even I know this basic information.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Dr.Vandana Shiva on Food - 2 mins.
Posted by: seedheads on May 21, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this little video, Dr.Shiva outlines the convergence of crisis facing humanity. More importantly, she shares a few simple solutions to the food crisis, climate crisis and the economic crisis. Find out what each of us can do to be a part of the solution.

Watch this little video from Dr.Shiva at

www.tinyurl.com/growfood

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Perception of evil
Posted by: willymack on May 21, 2009 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Varies somewhat with other cultures. In the Hindu culture, the Bagivad Gita sites the moral quandry of Arjuna, agonising over the prospect of fighting his relatives, until Lord Khrishna appears to him and preaches the nature of Evil and the necessity of resisting it regardless of who the evildoers are. This lesson in morality could be applied to us here as regards to the evil bushies, but probably never will be.
The Rig Veda teaches Hindus how to live in harmony with Nature, and the farming practices in India are based on it. It's only worked for about five thousand years, so what do they know?
Now comes Monsanto, that evil entity the people of India have no defense against. They simply can't concieve evil in that particular form, or the willingness of corrupt politicians to aid and abet it.
The chances that law enforcement officals here will force Monsanto to cease and desist in India is ZERO. The Indian people will have to do this themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perception of evil Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Perception of evil Posted by: willymack

Comments are closed-

If 'hundreds of thousands' of Indian Farmers
Posted by: Daito on May 21, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have killed themselves, who is still farming? I know if a 100,000 people in my line of work suddenly killed themselves because they thought their life was shitty, first off, I'd be swimming in new business.

I suppose the famers that are left should thank the ones that killed themselves. Now the market is under manned and prices will rise making farmers lives better and people who want to eat worse. But I guess if the starving kill themselves, no one notices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Farmers are not dumb
Posted by: davidzet on May 21, 2009 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they wanted to use non-GMO, traditional seeds, they could switch back.

If they saw the crop fail in 1997, then they would not have planted in 1998 (or 12 years later!)

I think that they plant the seeds b/c they want the additional profit. Some don't make it and they commit suicide.

This question is more complicated than Shiva's explanation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Farmers are not dumb Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

Throw the rich in the water?
Posted by: flymulla on May 21, 2009 10:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate Agriculture Is to Blame for the Hundreds of Thousands of Farmer Suicides in India
I agree with this. The farmers are stupid. They save the little water in the dames; the elite come and build the hydro electro dams that leaves many poor without the water. They have families. When they go home , wife asks of food, He has none. He is too ashamed and goes to hand under the tree or he jumps in the dame. He built; thinking that this will give him heaven Idiot is it not. What is your suggestion? Throw the rich in the water?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

vote
Posted by: dbaker on May 23, 2009 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
quit voting in corporate puppets everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

There are a billion people in India...
Posted by: jimidee on May 26, 2009 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how else are you going to feed them if you don't use every ag trick in the book, despite long term negative effects. Indians have long been irresponsible about controlling their populations, so they are reaping what they have sown (pun intended). What they need is a good pandemic. In fact, what we all need is a good pandemic.

1,500 farmers in India are a tiny fraction of the total farmers, and I will bet that nearly that many farmers kill themselves on a regular basis...there are a billion people in India...that is 1,000 million. That is 1,500 vs. 1,000,000,000. Get it? I liked the poster above that said "If 1,500 farmers killed themselves, who is left to do the farming?" Ha! There are a billion people in India. That is a lot of farmers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

corporate crime is cold-blooded crime formulated by people sitting in conference rooms
Posted by: Suzon on May 21, 2009 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The farmers were not told they would need irrigation. They were not told that they would need fertilizers and pesticides. They were not told they could not save the seeds. The cotton seeds were sold as "White Gold," with a false promise that farmers would become millionaires.

This is deception and concealment, the elements of corporate fraud.

Corporations are monarchist in origin, anti-democratic and anti-American. The rebels may have won the War of Independence and the War of 1812, but the corrupt monarchists prevailed and flourished.

The Norman-English dynasty still in power today in its former colonies is not the sole source of human suffering but it's a reliable one. Unfortunately, India is still being victimized by it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It is terrible.
Posted by: livinglight on May 21, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I see the headlines about how dangerous H1N1 is, and how few who have died from the flu, and compare with 200000 farmers who have commit suicide, I can see that 50000 farmers life = one life lost by the flu.

It is not understandable that the world accept this. I hope you understand my words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Stuffed and Starved, by Raj Patel
Posted by: artie on May 21, 2009 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This book by Patel argues the same points as the article.... the rampant evil of it all ....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Just Another Off-the-Wall Alternet Bit of Nonsense
Posted by: rcase on May 21, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When my father was growing corn 75 years ago his corn yielded 50 bushels to the acre. Now farmers expect 200 bushels to the acre. If we were still producing 50 bushels to the acre the world would have controlled its population simply by starvation. But behold, this article says that the ability to feed the world is a bad thing and we trace the badness to seed companies that produce the seed. There is no question farm policies are a mess. A little over 50 years ago I worked for ASC selling the government's program to inhibit oversupply by paying farmers not to grow corn. My area was Amish country. I found myself having to defend the undefendable. The simple question was: aren't there hungry people in the world? And yet our government wants us not to grow corn? Why not grow the corn and give it to hungry people? My answers varied from maintaining markets to how free food would destroy the livlihood of overseas farmers, to how the government knows best and you people don't. Farmers in underdeveloped countries could increase their productivity several times over without having to purchase fertilizers and agribusiness seed corn. There are marvelous stories of missionaries and agricultural ambassadors who have helped this to happen. That is where the emphasis should be, not on a hysterical rant about agribusiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Just a bit of oversimplification. Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

Monsanto - A Malignant Monster
Posted by: fmajor7 on May 21, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I first heard about GM seeds from Monsanto and watched a rather shocking documentary made in Germany by German farmers. To find out more about the havoc Monsanto had been causing the world over I did a quick search in Youtube and absolutely amazed with the number of even more shocking facts about Monsanto. I get the feeling that they want to own the World's total food chain !
Please look at :

http://tinyurl.com/malignant-monsanto

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Distortions as Usual
Posted by: D_Hudson on May 21, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meantime, the $4 billion subsidy given to U.S. agribusiness for cotton has led to dumping and depression of international prices.

First of all, it is very hard to distinguish where subsidies go. But, more importantly, India provides a support price to cotton in India that exceeds the U.S. target price for cotton. In addition, through input subsidies that are not counted in the Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) used by the world trade organization, India subsidizes its agricultural sector to the tune of 15-30% more than U.S. agriculture. There is much to be debated about agricultural policy globally, but providing false information to the public is not helpful.

See source for details on India's subsidy policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What a strange business model.
Posted by: jgilb on May 21, 2009 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Horrible Monsanto. They sold seeds to the farmers knowing that they would fail and commit suicide.

That's a strange business model, because Monsanto makes money by selling new seeds to the farmers each year and if their customers are killing themselves, repeat business would be down.

Is it possible that the farmer's ignorance of basic agricultural techniques might be at the root of the cause. Didn't think the crops would need water and fertilizer ? Didn't know that hybrids seeds cannot be replanted each year ? I'm not a farmer and even I know this basic information.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Dr.Vandana Shiva on Food - 2 mins.
Posted by: seedheads on May 21, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this little video, Dr.Shiva outlines the convergence of crisis facing humanity. More importantly, she shares a few simple solutions to the food crisis, climate crisis and the economic crisis. Find out what each of us can do to be a part of the solution.

Watch this little video from Dr.Shiva at

www.tinyurl.com/growfood

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Perception of evil
Posted by: willymack on May 21, 2009 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Varies somewhat with other cultures. In the Hindu culture, the Bagivad Gita sites the moral quandry of Arjuna, agonising over the prospect of fighting his relatives, until Lord Khrishna appears to him and preaches the nature of Evil and the necessity of resisting it regardless of who the evildoers are. This lesson in morality could be applied to us here as regards to the evil bushies, but probably never will be.
The Rig Veda teaches Hindus how to live in harmony with Nature, and the farming practices in India are based on it. It's only worked for about five thousand years, so what do they know?
Now comes Monsanto, that evil entity the people of India have no defense against. They simply can't concieve evil in that particular form, or the willingness of corrupt politicians to aid and abet it.
The chances that law enforcement officals here will force Monsanto to cease and desist in India is ZERO. The Indian people will have to do this themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perception of evil Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Perception of evil Posted by: willymack

Comments are closed-

If 'hundreds of thousands' of Indian Farmers
Posted by: Daito on May 21, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have killed themselves, who is still farming? I know if a 100,000 people in my line of work suddenly killed themselves because they thought their life was shitty, first off, I'd be swimming in new business.

I suppose the famers that are left should thank the ones that killed themselves. Now the market is under manned and prices will rise making farmers lives better and people who want to eat worse. But I guess if the starving kill themselves, no one notices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Farmers are not dumb
Posted by: davidzet on May 21, 2009 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they wanted to use non-GMO, traditional seeds, they could switch back.

If they saw the crop fail in 1997, then they would not have planted in 1998 (or 12 years later!)

I think that they plant the seeds b/c they want the additional profit. Some don't make it and they commit suicide.

This question is more complicated than Shiva's explanation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Farmers are not dumb Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

Throw the rich in the water?
Posted by: flymulla on May 21, 2009 10:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate Agriculture Is to Blame for the Hundreds of Thousands of Farmer Suicides in India
I agree with this. The farmers are stupid. They save the little water in the dames; the elite come and build the hydro electro dams that leaves many poor without the water. They have families. When they go home , wife asks of food, He has none. He is too ashamed and goes to hand under the tree or he jumps in the dame. He built; thinking that this will give him heaven Idiot is it not. What is your suggestion? Throw the rich in the water?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

vote
Posted by: dbaker on May 23, 2009 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
quit voting in corporate puppets everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

There are a billion people in India...
Posted by: jimidee on May 26, 2009 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how else are you going to feed them if you don't use every ag trick in the book, despite long term negative effects. Indians have long been irresponsible about controlling their populations, so they are reaping what they have sown (pun intended). What they need is a good pandemic. In fact, what we all need is a good pandemic.

1,500 farmers in India are a tiny fraction of the total farmers, and I will bet that nearly that many farmers kill themselves on a regular basis...there are a billion people in India...that is 1,000 million. That is 1,500 vs. 1,000,000,000. Get it? I liked the poster above that said "If 1,500 farmers killed themselves, who is left to do the farming?" Ha! There are a billion people in India. That is a lot of farmers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS