COMMENTS: 27
Corporate Agriculture Is to Blame for the Hundreds of Thousands of Farmer Suicides in India
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Last month, the world got a glimpse of an epidemic that has hit India in the last decade when news reports alerted readers to the suicides of 1,500 farmers in the Indian state of Chattisgarh.
But this has been only a fraction of the suicides committed by farmers since 1997, says Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., a physicist, environmentalist, feminist, science policy advocate and director of Navdanya and the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology.
While initial news reports blamed the recent suicides on falling water levels, Shiva explains that the suicide epidemic in India is a lot more complicated and far-reaching.
"Rapid increase in indebtedness is at the root of farmers' taking their lives," she wrote recently. "Debt is a reflection of a negative economy. Two factors have transformed agriculture from a positive economy into a negative economy for peasants: the rising of costs of production and the falling prices of farm commodities. Both these factors are rooted in the policies of trade liberalization and corporate globalization."
At the heart of this is a circle of indebtedness that has resulted from the so-called Green Revolution, which exported industrial agricultural practices to places like India and in doing so, made seeds, a once-renewable resource for farmers, into something that had be bought from corporations.
"In 1998, the World Bank's structural-adjustment policies forced India to open up its seed sector to global corporations like Cargill, Monsanto and Syngenta," Shiva wrote. "The global corporations changed the input economy overnight. Farm-saved seeds were replaced by corporate seeds, which need fertilizers and pesticides and cannot be saved. ... The shift from saved seed to corporate monopoly of the seed supply also represents a shift from biodiversity to monoculture in agriculture."
In an interview with AlterNet, Shiva explained how Monsanto’s Bt cotton has exemplified what can go wrong with industrial agriculture; what happens to farming communities when traditional farming methods are replaced by corporate sponsored mono-cropping; and how to stem the tide of farmer suicides.
Tara Lohan: Farmer suicides in India recently made the news when stories broke last month about 1,500 farmers taking their own lives, what do you attribute these deaths to?
Vandana Shiva: Over the last decade, 200,000 farmers have committed suicide. The 1,500 figure is for the state of Chattisgarh. In Vidharbha, 4,000 are committing suicide annually. This is the region where 4 million acres of cotton have been grown with Monsanto's Bt cotton. The suicides are a direct result of a debt trap created by ever-increasing costs of seeds and chemicals and constantly falling prices of agricultural produce.
When Monsanto's Bt cotton was introduced, the seed costs jumped from 7 rupees per kilo to 17,000 rupees per kilo. Our survey shows a thirteenfold increase in pesticide use in cotton in Vidharbha. Meantime, the $4 billion subsidy given to U.S. agribusiness for cotton has led to dumping and depression of international prices.
Squeezed between high costs and negative incomes, farmers commit suicide when their land is being appropriated by the money lenders who are the agents of the agrichemical and seed corporations. The suicides are thus a direct result of industrial globalized agriculture and corporate monopoly on seeds.
TL: Suicides of Indian farmers unfortunately is not news -- how long has this been a problem, how serious is the problem, what are the underlying causes?
VS: The first suicide that we studied took place in Warrangal in Andhra Pradesh in 1997. This region is a rain-fed dry region and used to grow dry land crops such as millets, pigeon pea etc. In 1997, the seed corporations converted the region from biodiverse agriculture to monocultures of cotton hybrid. The farmers were not told they would need irrigation. They were not told that they would need fertilizers and pesticides. They were not told they could not save the seeds. The cotton seeds were sold as "White Gold," with a false promise that farmers would become millionaires. Instead, the farmers landed in severe unpayable debt. This is how the suicides began.
TL: You said that 200,000 farmers have ended their lives since 1997 -- where does that statistic come from? Are there numbers to compare suicide rates for farmers pre-Green Revolution with the numbers we are seeing today?
VS: The statistics on farmers suicides are kept by the National Crime Bureau. Since there were no large-scale suicides prior to 1997, the statistics was not maintained before that. The combination of the spread of nonrenewable seeds and globalized trade has triggered the epidemic of suicides.
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on May 21, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is deception and concealment, the elements of corporate fraud.
Corporations are monarchist in origin, anti-democratic and anti-American. The rebels may have won the War of Independence and the War of 1812, but the corrupt monarchists prevailed and flourished.
The Norman-English dynasty still in power today in its former colonies is not the sole source of human suffering but it's a reliable one. Unfortunately, India is still being victimized by it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Prince Charles is One Of The Most Vocal and Forthright Opponents of GM Foods and Monoculture
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» i have no reason to think that Charles is on the wrong side of the argument but that doesn't mean
Posted by: Suzon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: livinglight on May 21, 2009 4:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not understandable that the world accept this. I hope you understand my words.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artie on May 21, 2009 5:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rcase on May 21, 2009 5:22 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Just a bit of oversimplification.
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Just a bit of oversimplification.
Posted by: Kathy-B
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fmajor7 on May 21, 2009 5:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please look at :
http://tinyurl.com/malignant-monsanto
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Monsanto - A Malignant Monster
Posted by: jewels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: D_Hudson on May 21, 2009 5:58 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, it is very hard to distinguish where subsidies go. But, more importantly, India provides a support price to cotton in India that exceeds the U.S. target price for cotton. In addition, through input subsidies that are not counted in the Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) used by the world trade organization, India subsidizes its agricultural sector to the tune of 15-30% more than U.S. agriculture. There is much to be debated about agricultural policy globally, but providing false information to the public is not helpful.
See source for details on India's subsidy policies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jgilb on May 21, 2009 6:18 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's a strange business model, because Monsanto makes money by selling new seeds to the farmers each year and if their customers are killing themselves, repeat business would be down.
Is it possible that the farmer's ignorance of basic agricultural techniques might be at the root of the cause. Didn't think the crops would need water and fertilizer ? Didn't know that hybrids seeds cannot be replanted each year ? I'm not a farmer and even I know this basic information.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a strange business model.
Posted by: disc golf
» RE: What a strange business model.
Posted by: Birdland
» Ignorance of basic agricultural techniques? They've only been farming this land for 50000 years.
Posted by: Defenestrator
» RE: What a strange business model.
Posted by: jewels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seedheads on May 21, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch this little video from Dr.Shiva at
www.tinyurl.com/growfood
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on May 21, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Rig Veda teaches Hindus how to live in harmony with Nature, and the farming practices in India are based on it. It's only worked for about five thousand years, so what do they know?
Now comes Monsanto, that evil entity the people of India have no defense against. They simply can't concieve evil in that particular form, or the willingness of corrupt politicians to aid and abet it.
The chances that law enforcement officals here will force Monsanto to cease and desist in India is ZERO. The Indian people will have to do this themselves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Perception of evil
Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Perception of evil
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daito on May 21, 2009 9:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose the famers that are left should thank the ones that killed themselves. Now the market is under manned and prices will rise making farmers lives better and people who want to eat worse. But I guess if the starving kill themselves, no one notices.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davidzet on May 21, 2009 12:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they saw the crop fail in 1997, then they would not have planted in 1998 (or 12 years later!)
I think that they plant the seeds b/c they want the additional profit. Some don't make it and they commit suicide.
This question is more complicated than Shiva's explanation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Farmers are not dumb
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: flymulla on May 21, 2009 10:08 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with this. The farmers are stupid. They save the little water in the dames; the elite come and build the hydro electro dams that leaves many poor without the water. They have families. When they go home , wife asks of food, He has none. He is too ashamed and goes to hand under the tree or he jumps in the dame. He built; thinking that this will give him heaven Idiot is it not. What is your suggestion? Throw the rich in the water?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dbaker on May 23, 2009 12:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jimidee on May 26, 2009 8:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1,500 farmers in India are a tiny fraction of the total farmers, and I will bet that nearly that many farmers kill themselves on a regular basis...there are a billion people in India...that is 1,000 million. That is 1,500 vs. 1,000,000,000. Get it? I liked the poster above that said "If 1,500 farmers killed themselves, who is left to do the farming?" Ha! There are a billion people in India. That is a lot of farmers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are a billion people in India...
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on May 21, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is deception and concealment, the elements of corporate fraud.
Corporations are monarchist in origin, anti-democratic and anti-American. The rebels may have won the War of Independence and the War of 1812, but the corrupt monarchists prevailed and flourished.
The Norman-English dynasty still in power today in its former colonies is not the sole source of human suffering but it's a reliable one. Unfortunately, India is still being victimized by it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Prince Charles is One Of The Most Vocal and Forthright Opponents of GM Foods and Monoculture
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» i have no reason to think that Charles is on the wrong side of the argument but that doesn't mean
Posted by: Suzon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: livinglight on May 21, 2009 4:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not understandable that the world accept this. I hope you understand my words.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artie on May 21, 2009 5:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rcase on May 21, 2009 5:22 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Just a bit of oversimplification.
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Just a bit of oversimplification.
Posted by: Kathy-B
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fmajor7 on May 21, 2009 5:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please look at :
http://tinyurl.com/malignant-monsanto
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Monsanto - A Malignant Monster
Posted by: jewels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: D_Hudson on May 21, 2009 5:58 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, it is very hard to distinguish where subsidies go. But, more importantly, India provides a support price to cotton in India that exceeds the U.S. target price for cotton. In addition, through input subsidies that are not counted in the Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) used by the world trade organization, India subsidizes its agricultural sector to the tune of 15-30% more than U.S. agriculture. There is much to be debated about agricultural policy globally, but providing false information to the public is not helpful.
See source for details on India's subsidy policies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jgilb on May 21, 2009 6:18 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's a strange business model, because Monsanto makes money by selling new seeds to the farmers each year and if their customers are killing themselves, repeat business would be down.
Is it possible that the farmer's ignorance of basic agricultural techniques might be at the root of the cause. Didn't think the crops would need water and fertilizer ? Didn't know that hybrids seeds cannot be replanted each year ? I'm not a farmer and even I know this basic information.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a strange business model.
Posted by: disc golf
» RE: What a strange business model.
Posted by: Birdland
» Ignorance of basic agricultural techniques? They've only been farming this land for 50000 years.
Posted by: Defenestrator
» RE: What a strange business model.
Posted by: jewels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seedheads on May 21, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch this little video from Dr.Shiva at
www.tinyurl.com/growfood
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on May 21, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Rig Veda teaches Hindus how to live in harmony with Nature, and the farming practices in India are based on it. It's only worked for about five thousand years, so what do they know?
Now comes Monsanto, that evil entity the people of India have no defense against. They simply can't concieve evil in that particular form, or the willingness of corrupt politicians to aid and abet it.
The chances that law enforcement officals here will force Monsanto to cease and desist in India is ZERO. The Indian people will have to do this themselves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Perception of evil
Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Perception of evil
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daito on May 21, 2009 9:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose the famers that are left should thank the ones that killed themselves. Now the market is under manned and prices will rise making farmers lives better and people who want to eat worse. But I guess if the starving kill themselves, no one notices.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davidzet on May 21, 2009 12:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they saw the crop fail in 1997, then they would not have planted in 1998 (or 12 years later!)
I think that they plant the seeds b/c they want the additional profit. Some don't make it and they commit suicide.
This question is more complicated than Shiva's explanation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Farmers are not dumb
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: flymulla on May 21, 2009 10:08 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with this. The farmers are stupid. They save the little water in the dames; the elite come and build the hydro electro dams that leaves many poor without the water. They have families. When they go home , wife asks of food, He has none. He is too ashamed and goes to hand under the tree or he jumps in the dame. He built; thinking that this will give him heaven Idiot is it not. What is your suggestion? Throw the rich in the water?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dbaker on May 23, 2009 12:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jimidee on May 26, 2009 8:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1,500 farmers in India are a tiny fraction of the total farmers, and I will bet that nearly that many farmers kill themselves on a regular basis...there are a billion people in India...that is 1,000 million. That is 1,500 vs. 1,000,000,000. Get it? I liked the poster above that said "If 1,500 farmers killed themselves, who is left to do the farming?" Ha! There are a billion people in India. That is a lot of farmers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are a billion people in India...
Posted by: jimidee
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




