Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

The Case of the Missing H-Bomb: The Pentagon Has Lost the Mother of All Weapons

By Jeffrey St. Clair, CounterPunch. Posted May 16, 2009.


60 years have passed since a damaged jet dropped a hydrogen bomb near Savanah, Ga. -- and the Pentagon still can't find it.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Things go missing. It's to be expected. Even at the Pentagon. Last October, the Pentagon's inspector general reported that the military's accountants had misplaced a destroyer, several tanks and armored personnel carriers, hundreds of machine guns, rounds of ammo, grenade launchers and some surface-to-air missiles. In all, nearly $8 billion in weapons were AWOL.

Those anomalies are bad enough. But what's truly chilling is the fact that the Pentagon has lost track of the mother of all weapons, a hydrogen bomb. The thermonuclear weapon, designed to incinerate Moscow, has been sitting somewhere off the coast of Savannah, Georgia for the past 40 years. The Air Force has gone to greater lengths to conceal the mishap than to locate the bomb and secure it.

On the night of February 5, 1958 a B-47 Stratojet bomber carrying a hydrogen bomb on a night training flight off the Georgia coast collided with an F-86 Saberjet fighter at 36,000 feet. The collision destroyed the fighter and severely damaged a wing of the bomber, leaving one of its engines partially dislodged. The bomber's pilot, Maj. Howard Richardson, was instructed to jettison the H-bomb before attempting a landing. Richardson dropped the bomb into the shallow waters of Warsaw Sound, near the mouth of the Savannah River, a few miles from the city of Tybee Island, where he believed the bomb would be swiftly recovered.

The Pentagon recorded the incident in a top secret memo to the chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission. The memo has been partially declassified: "A B-47 aircraft with a [word redacted] nuclear weapon aboard was damaged in a collision with an F-86 aircraft near Sylvania, Georgia, on February 5, 1958. The B-47 aircraft attempted three times unsuccessfully to land with the weapon. The weapon was then jettisoned visually over water off the mouth of the Savannah River. No detonation was observed."

Soon search and rescue teams were sent to the site. Warsaw Sound was mysteriously cordoned off by Air Force troops. For six weeks, the Air Force looked for the bomb without success. Underwater divers scoured the depths, troops tromped through nearby salt marshes, and a blimp hovered over the area attempting to spot a hole or crater in the beach or swamp. Then just a month later, the search was abruptly halted. The Air Force sent its forces to Florence, South Carolina, where another H-bomb had been accidentally dropped by a B-47. The bomb's 200 pounds of TNT exploded on impact, sending radioactive debris across the landscape. The explosion caused extensive property damage and several injuries on the ground. Fortunately, the nuke itself didn't detonate.

The search teams never returned to Tybee Island, and the affair of the missing H-bomb was discreetly covered up. The end of the search was noted in a partially declassified memo from the Pentagon to the AEC, in which the Air Force politely requested a new H-bomb to replace the one it had lost. "The search for this weapon was discontinued on 4-16-58 and the weapon is considered irretrievably lost. It is requested that one [phrase redacted] weapon be made available for release to the DOD as a replacement."

There was a big problem, of course, and the Pentagon knew it. In the first three months of 1958 alone, the Air Force had four major accidents involving H-bombs. (Since 1945, the United States has lost 11 nuclear weapons.) The Tybee Island bomb remained a threat, as the AEC acknowledged in a June 10, 1958 classified memo to Congress: "There exists the possibility of accidental discovery of the unrecovered weapon through dredging or construction in the probable impact area. … The Department of Defense has been requested to monitor all dredging and construction activities."

But the wizards of Armageddon saw it less as a security, safety or ecological problem, than a potential public relations disaster that could turn an already paranoid population against their ambitious nuclear project. The Pentagon and the AEC tried to squelch media interest in the issue by a doling out a morsel of candor and a lot of misdirection. In a joint statement to the press, the Defense Department and the AEC admitted that radioactivity could be "scattered" by the detonation of the high explosives in the H-bombs. But the letter downplayed possibility of that ever happening: "The likelihood that a particular accident would involve a nuclear weapon is extremely limited."

In fact, that scenario had already occurred and would occur again.

That's where the matter stood for more than 42 years until a deep sea salvage company, run by former Air Force personnel and a CIA agent, disclosed the existence of the bomb and offered to locate it for a million dollars. Along with recently declassified documents, the disclosure prompted fear and outrage among coastal residents and calls for a congressional investigation into the incident itself and why the Pentagon had stopped looking for the missing bomb. "We're horrified because some of that information has been covered up for years," said Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pentagon, h-bomb, loose nuke, savannah georgia

Jeffrey St. Clair is the author of Been Brown So Long It Looked Like Green to Me: the Politics of Nature and Grand Theft Pentagon. His newest book, Born Under a Bad Sky, is just out from AK Press / CounterPunch books. He can be reached at: sitka@comcast.net

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Movie exposes the true number of lost nukes
Posted by: sicntired on May 16, 2009 1:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was watching a movie about the first bomb lost in B.C.Canada and aside from no confirmed recovery of the bomb in that case,they mentioned the Georgia case as well as several more.There are a very unhealthy number of nukes lying on the ocean floor and others where they know nothing about where they were lost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surprised?
Posted by: folkie on May 16, 2009 2:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the folks that can lose a few trillion dollars and never notice it, so what did anyone expect? All they've lost are nukes, money, and wars--what about us? We've lost our minds if we keep giving them more nukes, money, and wars to lose.

Don't confuse what they've lost with what they're spending. When the Pentagon says it has lost $2.3 trillion, that means money that wasn't accounted for in any way, shape, or form. It means that their budget is so huge that $2.3 trillion is petty cash that they can easily overlook.

Gee, there's no money for a national health care plan. There's no money for Social Security or Medicare. Not a paltry dime to spend ensuring that the torture stops. But a few trillion for yacht parties and bonuses for billionaire crooks? Sure any time! Another few trillion to expand the defense budget? Why not?

And if that bomb explodes? So we'll have another Chernobyl only worse and right here at home. Expect the government to be just as helpful as it was in New Orleans with Hurricane Katrina--they'll rush in some private mercenaries to shoot anyone who tries to leave the area.

But don't you dare try to take your baby's bottle on the airplane, you friggin' terrorist--Homeland Security knows what to do with the likes of you! Why are you feeding a baby in the first place--you some kind of liberal pinko Commie who cares about kids? Family values means killing kids, bombing kids, nuking kids--that's how you make money. You must be some kinda stinking foreigner--no patriotic American cares about kids. Why do you think we can spend trillions on nukes but can't afford health care, because we care about kids?

Hey, be patient. Obama's gonna find that bomb just as soon as he finishes hiding the torture photos from Congress. Trust him! Maybe he didn't save the polar bears, but he never shot a wolf in his life. And anyway, the H-bombs we've lost are smaller than the ones we have now--they're obviously the lesser evil so you HAVE to support them. They might not be what you want, but they're all you're going to get.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Surprised? Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Surprised? Posted by: RDC
Can't find the nuke? They should just follow ...
Posted by: harryf200 on May 16, 2009 3:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... the three headed chickens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lost stuff...
Posted by: ellie on May 16, 2009 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
besides the missing nukes, look at all the rest of the junk the pentagon has managed to loose... ok, so where did you guys last see (fill in the blank)... comforting thoughts... not to mention the $$ missing...

a 5 year old takes better care of their toys... that's it, no more toys till you guys find the stuff you lost... period...

back to coffee...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lost stuff... Posted by: Jennie
Actually, this was 51 years ago.
Posted by: T.Rex on May 16, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They hadn't yet even invented the H-bomb 60 years ago, i.e. in 1949. This particular bomb was lost in early 1958, which was approximately 51 years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Actually, this was 51 years ago. Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Actually, this was 51 years ago. Posted by: ExpectoPatronum
And don't forget the 'bomb' America has lost in Iraq and elsewhere
Posted by: fearn on May 16, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like these 'lost' nuclear weapons depleted uranium is another 'lost' American source of radiation than will probably come back to haunt us.
Funny thing about Americans, they don't ask 'Why?' in a meaningful way. Why did I get cancer, 'oh I don't know I just want to get rid of it'. Why does America spend more on the military that the rest of the world put together? 'Oh, that's just the way it is'!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But .... Posted by: harryf200
holy crap
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 16, 2009 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And to think....I feel guilty and inadequate when I lose my car keys.

Obviously, I need to not worry so dang much.

Maybe they should put me in charge of the freaking pentagon, anal-retentive organizational freak that I am!

We'll come up with a plan to put our nukes somewhere we KNOW we can find later. Like inside our purse that ALWAYS goes on the same shelf in the kitchen.

Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!

Luv,
granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets ask Judy Miller ?
Posted by: weathered on May 16, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that stellar example of journalistic integrity.

May she wash the feet of those dying/injured and brutalized - here and there.

..and to the NYTimes, all the Lies fit to print. A paper that took a piss all over integrity and a allegiance of trust.

'by deceit we wage war' that's a chip off a toxic block that translates well in all MSM/PBS/NPR and the mother of all deceit:hollywood.
Examine screenplays and content, its diabolic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anybody wonder...
Posted by: Bloomshine on May 16, 2009 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Why the hell do they keep flying nuclear weapons around the globe anyway?!

Do they just have jets flying around near constantly in case someone starts a nuclear war all of a sudden?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing A-Bomb
Posted by: frank69 on May 16, 2009 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's at least one missing A-Bomb in Alaska courtesy of a SAC B-50 which was picking up ice and consequently was losing altitude. So the flight crew jettisoned the big heavy bomb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Missing A-Bomb Posted by: Pirate1
Most Disgusting
Posted by: JSquercia on May 16, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To me the most disgusting part of the article was the treatment of the other personnel used in the Clean Up . to not provide them the same gear as our troops is surely indigative of the Pentagon's attitude towards anyone but their own . What was done to the Danish soldiers should be a crime and for us to dismiss their claims is unconcienable .

I whole heartedly agree with the posters who claim that this shows why we need to take an Axe to the Pentagon Budget . People who have no problem investing in Billion dollar aircraft that NO ONE wants

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Most Disgusting Posted by: kogwonton
» RE: Most Disgusting Posted by: laoma
» RE: Most Disgusting Posted by: Hans
Nuclear black market?
Posted by: kogwonton on May 16, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
considering how trustworthy our military/intelligence/government/corporate handlers are, I'd be more inclined to wonder if most of those 'lost' nukes didn't go the way of a lot of other taxpayer funded projects - looted and sold to the highest bidder a'la Sgt. Bilko. As I recall Sibel Edmonds had a few things to say about that, but was gagged by the U.S. DoJ. I guess the fact that a nuclear black market operating out of the U.S. State Dept. in cohootz with the Turkish and Pakistanian embassies was somehow connected to the 'chatter' of the Sept. 11 attacks was just too much for the American sheep to handle. Bad enough that there was a 'fast track' system operating out of the U.S. embassy in Saudi Arabia and Jordan which granted visas to terrorists allowing them into the U.S. for training purposes. I have been watchful of any further news concerning the loading and shipment of armed nukes just a couple of years ago under GWB/Cheney's watch. I forget how many nukes were involved. Six? Eight? And how many 'accidents' involving the incredibly redundant security protocols had to happen to allow that little 'accident'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Check with Dick Cheney!
Posted by: nobuko on May 16, 2009 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you think for one SECOND Cheney does not have those missing nukes? Why do you think he is talking the crap he is talking? 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB, because they had ALL the INTEL to PREVENT 9/11 from happening!

Cheney keeps talking, BE AFRAID, BE AFRAID, this bastard is going to cause another 9/11 if Obama gets in his way in Iraq and Afganistan!

These evil doer's are as serious as cheneys pace maker, they WANT TO CONTROL IT ALL, and will DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY, to CONTROL IT!

Have you wondered, how much is ENOUGH for these greedy bastards?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Check with Dick Cheney! Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
This article needs fact check
Posted by: Tony44 on May 16, 2009 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The fourth bomb landed eight miles offshore and was missing for several months. It was eventually located by a mini-submarine in 2,850 feet of water, where it rests to this day."
Sorry - this one was recovered by the Navy, photos were publicly released of it on the deck of the salvage tug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Destroyer...?
Posted by: CanuckKid on May 16, 2009 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...the Pentagon's inspector general reported that the military's accountants had misplaced a destroyer..."

How the heck do you misplace a naval vessel? Surely the crew must know where it is - or are you telling me that the entire crew left the ship and couldn't find their way back to it again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Destroyer...? Posted by: zipper696
» RE: A Destroyer...? Posted by: Jennie
» Bermuda Triangle...?! Posted by: CanuckKid
» RE: Bermuda Triangle...?! Posted by: mscott1163
» RE: A Destroyer...? Posted by: leafsong1
This is so silly...
Posted by: Pirate1 on May 16, 2009 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are talking sea water interacting with metal. Within a decade all the metal in that thing was corroded beyond recognition. After 60 years? Dude, you'd be hard pressed to recognize anything remotely resembling metal, let alone a bomb... only the radiologic signature of the bomb's trigger would be detectable if you happened to be right on top of it... again, a highly unlikely scenario. Let's give our attention to REAL issues like all the NEW bombs being built. Or how about stopping the madness of still drilling for new oil like we can just go on as we have for the last hundred years without any climatological consequences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gee... Posted by: zipper696
Bombs away
Posted by: Archie1954 on May 16, 2009 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After reading this article I am very surprised that any country would give consent to American warplanes traversing their territory. I also find it unbelievable that the respective governments of Denmark and Spain haven't sued the US for gross negligence causing serious harm and death. Have you ever found any country that takes a more offensive position with friends than to refuse the protective gear to these men who are cleaning up after US egregious activities? I call that the act of a disgusting, perverse and sociopathic nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bombs away Posted by: mscott1163
WeMadeAmistake
Posted by: aroleflin on May 16, 2009 6:02 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would rather die a quick death from an H-bomb than die a slow death as a result of Obama's ruination of our economy and our country. I am sick and tired of this incompetant idiot in Washington slowly bankrupting our country. I would be more worried about what this Kenyan Kommunist is doing to you and children than some rusty corroded H-bomb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WeMadeAmistake Posted by: bobdown
» RE: WeMadeAmistake Posted by: kogwonton
» Spelling Lesson: Posted by: CanuckKid
» RE: Georgian ? Posted by: Purple Girl
» RE: YerMamaMadeAmistake Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: WeMadeAmistake Posted by: kelly.nickell
WeMadeAmistake
Posted by: aroleflin on May 16, 2009 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and for you Bush Haters regarding WMD in Iraq. Here is a quote from your hero Bill Clinton:
Dec. 16, 1998, Web Poste at 8:51 p.m. EST (0151 GMT) Washington (CNN) From the Oval Office, President Clinton told the nation Wednesday evening why he ordered new military strikes against Iraq: The president said Iraq's refusal to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors presented a threat to the entire world. "Sadam (Hussein) must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or bilogical weapons, " Clinton said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm no fan of WJC, but... Posted by: CanuckKid
» Do you have a point? Posted by: leafsong1
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: Wow Posted by: wrinklemomma
» RE: Wow Posted by: folkie
» Get cancer Posted by: Borgar
Did the author get an F in inorganic chemistry?
Posted by: Swatopluk on May 17, 2009 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If water reaches the lithium deuteride it will simply decompose into lithium hydroxide and (heavy) hydrogen gas that would simply bubble up. It can't explode under water since there is not enough free oxygen there and once it reaches the surface it will be diluted enough to be harmless (and would only burn, not explode, anyway since it would not be enclosed).
And why should a terorist be interested in the lithium (or the deuterium) anyway? Heavy water or other deuterated compounds can be bought freely (although it is not cheap) and even the separation of 6Li and 7Li is not that difficult (compared to uranium enrichment).
Anyone wealthy enough to finance an expedition to salvage the bomb undetected could afford the fabrication of 6LiD. The problem for an H-bomb builder is the procurement of the fission bomb to ignite the fusion reaction (=plutonium or highly enriched uranium) and to get the design right the first time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Question? Posted by: EJW
» RE: Question? Posted by: Swatopluk
» ...and another. Posted by: EJW
» RE: ...and another. Posted by: Swatopluk
Yanaar
Posted by: context on May 17, 2009 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They (Pentagon insiders,)are going for a military coup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yanaar Posted by: mnstra
Maybe that explains...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on May 18, 2009 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that 6 eyed dogfish I caught fishing in Warsaw Sound...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing WMD
Posted by: CJC on May 18, 2009 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We were looking in the wrong place.

The DoD, keeping us safe 24,7.

Thanks for posting this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dont worry about this bomb.
Posted by: james2macd on May 18, 2009 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard about this lost bomb years ago on some TV program. I thought to myself, why would the Navy only spend three days looking for it. The answer is clear if you think about it. Back in the 50s during the cold war, planes were in the air as a deterrent to the russians who knew they could not stop all the bombs even with a first strike. A Hydrogen bomb cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make and the material for these bombs were not as readily available in the 50s as they are today. THIS BOMB WAS A DUD. They had more bombers than they had bombs. Think about it...the deterrent is still there even if the Russians knew this fact. The pilots did not even know that they were carrying a dud. I did not read this anywhere. This is my take on this situation. It is the only thing that makes sense. Comments are more than welcome....James

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dont worry about this bomb. Posted by: harryf200
One really shouldn't leave H-Bombs lieing around...
Posted by: Ghoulman on May 18, 2009 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... call me crazy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh
Posted by: theone23ord on May 18, 2009 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or just more non-stop "TERA! TERA! TERA!"?

Please read and listen...

iamthewitness.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So That Explains THAT
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader on May 18, 2009 10:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks, walks in storms, I was wondering what motivated editor Joshua Holland to post his juvenile rant against so-called "conspiracy theorists."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Basic information collection versus purism
Posted by: PaulK on May 19, 2009 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have volunteers and we have erstwhile journalists. These groups will perform basic information collection. They get lots of details wrong, but they get the basic facts right. Mostly.

Purists are what the government can afford to hire.

You people who see holes in the author's information collection, thank you for your contributions. Since you're interested, would you please consider working with the author (who is not me!) on the book? Oh, and volunteers, try not to be smug about your discoveries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And what else is lying around?
Posted by: PaulK on May 19, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. A Brown University professor brought home a pound of weapons-grade uranium from Los Alamos. He wanted to grab it before they slapped some controls on the stuff. It sat in a closet until long after he retired.

2. The U.S.S. Thresher is on the bottom of the Atlantic near rich fishing grounds. What happens to a nuclear reactor in salt water and under heavy pressure?

3. All of Golden, Colorado is aglow because the local plutonium reprocessing plant spewed all sorts of stuff over the years. Oh, and what melts in the ground, not in your mouth? Hershey, Pennsylvania.

4. Does your local college have a nuclear reactor? By definition, every nuclear reactor contains enough uranium to create a nuclear poof. That's where, if you take all the uranium out and put the rods in a big spherical pile without any control rods, the whole thing soon hits 5000 degrees and turns into single atom radioactive dust particles (and you turn into a radioactive firemonster, er, let me do some factchecking on that).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sources please.... Posted by: EJW
» RE: Sources please.... Posted by: PaulK
they know where it is
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 19, 2009 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its the CIA or Pentagon's 'ace in the hole'

in case they're ever in deep shit with Americans.

they can always 'go rogue' & protect themselves as they make a run for it.

"warcrimes? what warcrimes? ...don't make us release those real & forged documents in Court or Press!... oh! you ARE going to bother being traiterous Americans & holding us accountable for 60 years of corporate-supporting warcrimes? ... just a minute, lemme show you our own Weapon Of Mass Destruction... don't make us roll out a 'terrorist attack' by some brown people... that could get sticky... "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you're supposing they haven't Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Ken
Posted by: Old Cowboy on May 19, 2009 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this passes for news-worthy content? I've known about this for a very long time and it was aired on a discivery/science channel report and investigation a decade or more ago, as it was recently.

Come on, get current.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sourpuss. Posted by: waterflaws
» RE: Ken Posted by: gimmie shelter
» RE: Ken Posted by: xmvince
40, 60, how many years
Posted by: BPomeroy on May 19, 2009 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sort of reporting/ranting is getting old. You variously characterise this well-known event as occurring in 1958, 60 and 40 years ago. It seems like you must have any number of newly pubescent writers braying opines which mostly reflect immaturity and their irresistable urge to zealously make a splash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 40, 60, how many years Posted by: gimmie shelter
Ultimate gross-out
Posted by: willymack on May 19, 2009 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best horror writers in the world couldn't touch the FACTUAL horror of thermonuclear weapons and the pathetic incompetence of those handling them. Wasn't the complete elimination of all nuclear devices begun during Clinton's time in office? Didn't we secure the cooperation of the Russians in this? What's keeping us from making a new beginning in this direction? This is a no-brainer, folks; get rid of the hideous things once and for all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the USSR?
Posted by: vertical on May 19, 2009 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we can screw-up this bad with our nukes just imagine how many the Russians have lost and waiting to become a problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hardly a secret
Posted by: DrAtomic on May 19, 2009 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"That's where the matter stood for more than 42 years until a deep sea salvage company, run by former Air Force personnel and a CIA agent, disclosed the existence of the bomb and offered to locate it for a million dollars."

It's true that this offer renewed interest in the bomb and led Rep. Kingston to request a new analysis from the Air Force of the feasibility of retrieving the bomb. But the basic facts were disclosed by the DOD in an unclassified 1981 chronology and subsequent research by various scholars added more details. There was also a very good 1998 documentary, "Lost Bombs," that aired on the History Channel. It featured an interview with pilot Howard Richardson and also reconstructed the accident.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

imagine that!!
Posted by: dsmidiman on May 19, 2009 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We invaded a country took over it's government and hanged it's president all because he and his country supposedly had WMDs which posed a threat to us and the rest of the world. Forget the fact that no WMDs were ever found. Look at us!! We have the largest number of nukes as anyone on this planet and apparently there are a few of them laying around under water waiting to ether be acidentally detonated or found by evil people who want to detonate them? Imagine that???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is never a threat
Posted by: praedor on May 19, 2009 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of a nuclear detonation with these things (a critical event). It is impossible. It CAN detonate as, essentially, a dirty bomb. Of course, you wouldn't want the materials to fall into criminal/terrorist hands. They could create mischief with such a device.

In any case, it should now be fairly easy to find. A modern magnetic anomaly detector would likely pick it up with ease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's probably safely tucked under the wing of an Israeli jetfighter.
Posted by: waterflaws on May 19, 2009 10:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's probably where most of the missing enriched uranium went, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What else is lying around?
Posted by: gsmiley on May 20, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My father helped bury tonnes of mustard gas and/or chlorine shells on Adak in the Aleutian chain when the Japanese were being turfed out of Kiska and Attu. (All US territory for those who went to school in America) Rough maps were drawn on scrap paper by untrained GI's, passed along the chain of command into oblivion and is anybody stupid enough to think it ever got recovered? Hell only foxes, whales and salmon up there anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on May 20, 2009 6:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The military machine in this country could care less about the citizens which has been shown in many many ways. The lie, pollute and kill their own. I think the generals should be water boarded, drugged, anthrax ed from the military stores, not given adequate armored vehicles or vest, miss diagnosed, kept in theater of an unjust war well after they should have, electrocuted by one contractor and given rancid food by another, brought home to no jobs and in many cases no wife and family.

Why should a few bombs surprise us they have done everything they could to get rid of all of us including flying in the wrong direction on 9-11.

Keep buying ammo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very funny show about Tybee Bomb
Posted by: JeffW on May 22, 2009 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Tybee Bomb was the subject of "Martha & Dotty: Microwave Mambo!" It's an audio comedy that was a big podcast hit at the 2008 Philadelphia Fringe Festival. You can download it at MicrowaveMambo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surprised
Posted by: pattyjca on May 23, 2009 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank You Very Well Said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Asked for a comment about the missing nuclear weapons...
Posted by: wildbill on May 23, 2009 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Captain Renault replied, "I'm shocked, shocked to find that the U.S. military would lie and cover up to maintain its untarnished public image!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

syed salamah ali mahdi
Posted by: salamah on May 23, 2009 11:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you want to know where many of such 'missing' nukes are? They have been 'safely' delivered to Israel because this is the most ingenious way to do so, away from 'inquisitive' eyes. Report them as 'lost for ever' and close the file.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: syed salamah ali mahdi Posted by: gimmie shelter
gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on May 24, 2009 3:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally think it is all a shell game. Nothing ever works the way it should and the results are always blamed on something else, some one else or on timing or the weather or simply because not enough of the never ending supply of money was spent. Some times we have store fronts with no stores behind the facade. They get to steal our money and we get to admire the illusion they have prepared for us....but which is an illusion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement