Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Honeybees Continue to Vanish: Don't Blame Aliens -- It's Our Addiction to Pesticides That's at Fault

By Evaggelos Vallianatos, TruthOut.org. Posted April 16, 2009.


The chemicals we use in industrial agriculture cause brain damage to the bees, making it often impossible for them to find their way home.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When I was teaching at Humboldt State University in northern California 20 years ago, I invited a beekeeper to talk to my students. He said that each time he took his bees to southern California to pollinate other farmers' crops, he would lose a third of his bees to sprays. In 2009, the loss ranges all the way to 60 percent.

Honeybees have been in terrible straits.

A little history explains this tragedy.

For millennia, honeybees lived in symbiotic relationship with societies all over the world.

The Greeks loved them. In the eighth century BCE, the epic poet Hesiod considered them gifts of the gods to just farmers. And in the fourth century of our era, the Greek mathematician Pappos admired their hexagonal cells, crediting them with "geometrical forethought."

However, industrialized agriculture is not friendly to honeybees.

In 1974, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency licensed the nerve gas parathion trapped into nylon bubbles the size of pollen particles.

What makes this microencapsulated formulation more dangerous to bees than the technical material is the very technology of the "time release" microcapsule.

This acutely toxic insecticide, born of chemical warfare, would be on the surface of the flower for several days. The foraging bee, if alive after its visit to the beautiful white flowers of almonds, for example, laden with invisible spheres of asphyxiating gas, would be bringing back to its home pollen and nectar mixed with parathion.

It is possible that the nectar, which the bee makes into honey, and the pollen, might end up in some food store to be bought and eaten by human beings.

Beekeepers are well aware of what is happening to their bees, including the potential that their honey may not be fit for humans.

Moreover, many beekeepers do not throw away the honey, pollen and wax of colonies destroyed by encapsulated parathion or other poisons. They melt the wax for new combs: And they sell both honey and pollen to the public.

Government "regulators" know about this danger.

An academic expert, Carl Johansen, professor of entomology at Washington State University in Pullman, Washington, called the microencapsulated methyl parathion "the most destructive bee poisoning insecticide ever developed."

In 1976, the U.S. Department of Agriculture published a report by one of its former employees, S. E. McGregor, a honeybee expert who documented that about a third of what we eat benefits from honeybee pollination. This includes vegetables, oilseeds and domesticated animals eating bee-pollinated hay.

In 2007, the value of food dependent on honeybees was $15 billion in the United States.

McGregor also pointed out that insect-pollinated legumes collect nitrogen from the air, storing it in their roots and enriching the soil. In addition, insect pollination makes the crops more wholesome and abundant. He advised the farmer he should never forget that "no cultural practice will cause fruit or seed to set if its pollination is neglected."

In addition, McGregor blamed the chemical industry for seducing the farmers to its potent toxins. He said:

"[P]esticides are like dope drugs. The more they are used the more powerful the next one must be to give satisfaction" and therein develops the spiraling effect, the pesticide treadmill. The chemical salesman, in pressuring the grower to use his product, practically assumes the role of the "dope pusher." Once the victim, the grower, is "hooked," he becomes a steady and an ever-increasing user.

No government agency listened to McGregor.

The result of America's pesticide treadmill is that now, in 2009, honeybees and other pollinators are moving towards extinction.

In October 2006, the U.S. National Research Council warned of the" "demonstrably downward" trends in the populations of pollinators. For the first time since 1922, American farmers are renting imported bees for their crops. They are even buying bees from Australia.

Honeybees, the National Academies report said, pollinate more than 90 crops in America, but have declined by 30 percent in the last 20 years alone. The scientists who wrote the report expressed alarm at the precipitous decline of the pollinators.

Unfortunately, this made no difference to EPA, which failed to ban the microencapsulated parathion that is so deadly to honeybees.

Bee experts know that insecticides cause brain damage to the bees, disorienting them, making it often impossible for them to find their way home.

This is a consequence of decades of agribusiness warfare against nature and, in time, honeybees. In addition, beekeepers truck billions of bees all over the country for pollination, depriving them of good food, stressing them enormously, and, very possibly, injuring their health.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: agribusiness, bees, pesticides

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Quite True
Posted by: heid on Apr 16, 2009 1:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote about this many moons ago: Colony Collapse Disorder Is a Fraud—Pesticides Cause Bee Die-Offs.

Germany and France have banned these pesticides.

So-called Colony Collapse Disorder is a myth, a concept created by those who are making money off these poisons - chemical/pharmaceutical manufacturers, which are the same thing, agribusiness, and the researchers who collect money from researching the fraud.

It's classic misdirection. As long as people think there's a mystery, then the scam can continue. How long are we going to allow this destruction of our world for profit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a Beekeeper
Posted by: rjs0 on Apr 16, 2009 2:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its pretty certain that colony collapse disorder as we know it first appeaared in 2006 and did the most damge in 07 & 08...pesticides have been around a lot longer than that..as a beekeeper and one whose has subscribed to all the journals & kept up with the progression & studies of this malady, its been pretty certainly established that those affected colonies are infected with israeli acute paralysis virus...but this virus is in other hives that have not "collapsed", so its thought that the virus is a contributing weakening factor that combined with other factors, such as weather stress or varroa mites. pushes the bees over the edge...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Or perhaps... Posted by: heid
» RE: Or perhaps... Posted by: rjs0
» RE: Or perhaps... Posted by: heid
» RE: Or perhaps... Posted by: rjs0
» That isn't my view. Posted by: heid
» RE: That isn't my view. Posted by: rjs0
» RE: Or perhaps... Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» That wasn't me. Posted by: heid
» Creationism Posted by: ABetterFuture
Behind the scenes
Posted by: phead0 on Apr 16, 2009 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the classical story of the effect of chemical pesticides against key species which are the principal ecological movers of the natural world - DDT is a famous and equally scurrillous example of profiteering over the malaria vector which ultimately failed to work on said creature, but worked wonders of destruction on the biomass wherever it laid its hat.Causing all kinds of reproductive problems and infirmities.

Such calamity and panic response is the butt of homo sapien intelligence. The ignorance and arrogance that currently rules and that has ruled for so long will be the purveyor of the timely death of the dominant scourge specie.

It is only a matter of time - nature will of course adapt and recycle since it is the authority - it wont need to feed billions of hungry mouths, they will have inherited the earth. Those human parasites too who were responsible for the greed and destruction will perish because homo sapien is not a sustainable specie.It lives thanks to the ecological composition of this earthworld, all that it has invented and consumed is in disregard of the ongoing impacts. What happened 100 or 200 years ago is the same relatively speaking, why? because of mans permanent affair with his arrogance and his ignorance.

This is just an outline, what is more important is this is the beginning of the end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Alternet. For a minute there, I thought you were pro agribusiness based on that other article
Posted by: Sports Warrior Casey Jones on Apr 16, 2009 2:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most pesticides come from petroleum. If the petroleum supplies tighten and get more expensive, the good news is there won't be as many pesticides to harm the honey bees. By the way, since the UN is also in bed with agri-business, I strongly support abolishing the UN and much of the US government as well. There's too much big government in this country and around the world and it's not only killing us, it's hurting mother nature. Government that governs the least governs the best. Just like good unions getting replaced by cranky greedy ones, the honey bees have been replaced by the killer bees from what I learned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

honeyman
Posted by: honeyman on Apr 16, 2009 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one who is both a beekeeper and who has written extensively about the bee issue I can assure readers that the opinion of beekeepers and researchers is coming down against corporate agriculture.

Modern farming functions best when the land is treated as a lifeless commodity for the cultivation of a single crop...essentially being converted to a biological desert which favors conditions for a select few insect pests.

GM crops carrying toxic, inserted genes from natural sources, bT, act against the most common pest, the corn borer. Furthermore, systemic poisons such as the synthetic nicotine, imidacloprid , are introduced into the growing plant by the use of coated seeds.

State University Agriculture departments,the EPA, Congress and some of the most powerful corporations in the world have been complicit in the creation of the biocaust which is decimating not only bee populations but insects in general as well as other sensitive living species.

New efforts to alter this sorry state of affairs are appearing so we might possibly have reason to hope for the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: honeyman Posted by: heid
» RE: honeyman Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: honeyman Posted by: Word Mix
some bad chemistry
Posted by: jbro434 on Apr 16, 2009 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who has worked with agriculture and structural pest control for 16 years, I have learned quite a bit about fipronil, imidacloprid and clothianidin. I have been telling people for the past two years that these are the culprits. I know of several companies that overuse fipronil because it is viewed as a magic bullet. They ignore the label and the law to avoid call backs from customers. I have talked to almond growers in California who are noticing how bad it has become since the mass use of these products. The introduction of some of these products and GMO corn has caused them to import bees from the Dakotas to pollinate and the cost is skyrocketing. Bayer, Monsanto and BASF are fighting tooth and nail and spending big bucks to fight the findings on these products and have started campaigns to promote these products as Green Chemistry due to the fact that the percentage of active ingredient per gallon is fairly low compared to products of old. However, the toxicity and persistance is extremely high. Coated seeds are causing the chemicals to become systemic and showing up in the pollen. Bees seem to be doing better in areas that are producing organic products but they can fly to a field close by and be affected if these chemistries are present. Here in the EU, despite the good intentions of the Stockholm Convention, Bayer, Syngenta and BASF are winning some battles to keep the chemistry available. These global giants have found ways to strangle innovation by lobbying the governments of the world and errecting costly barriers to get safer technology approved. In the US, they lobbyed under the umbrella of an organization called RISE to block products from EPA approval that used essential oil technology that are effective and much safer. This is going to be an interesting summer to see how much worse it has gotten and to see if the World will step up and demand that these products are put under more strict guidlines or as I hope, elliminated all together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: some bad chemistry Posted by: cougars62960
» RE: some bad chemistry Posted by: jbro434
» RE: some bad chemistry Posted by: Joni50
Get ready
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Apr 16, 2009 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get ready for another "there is no global warming" campaign by the corporations where pesticides and the bees are concerned. You'll hear it all: man - meaning industry and corporate capitalism isn't responsible - it's all natural. The bees all die every so often, anyway. Et cetera, et cetera, et ceters.

Here in South Texas, we are gasping for breath, scratching and itching, developing all manner of strange health disorders which include leukemia and being born with half a brains (that explains a lot about Texas, including our politics, doesn't it?), and more.

The soil and is loaded with arsenic and half a dozen other heavy metal poisons produced by refineries, plastics factory, and on and on and on, the landscape is dotted with abandoned in situ uranium dumps and spill, and we bathe, drink, and cook daily with radioactive water produced by in situ uranium miners.

But this is the land of "industry at all costs," the government whose "environmental protection agency is comatose (except at paycheck time) so those of us who can't flee must do what we can. We dream about being able to leave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get ready TO GO Posted by: bbq
dusting powder
Posted by: heide on Apr 16, 2009 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i have chickens,,i went to the farm store to get something to keep the lice and mites off
they sold me garden pet & livestock dusting powder ,,, which in very fine print on the back of the can says
HARMFUL TO HONEYBEES,,,grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr mind you this print is tiny
so i have a ???? anyone out there know any organic ways to keeps those icky bugs off my chickens....sides changing their hay alot
just think of all those humans out there dusting off their critters with this stuff
i love my bees,that come to visit my garden, some have even let me pet them while they were sitting on sunflowers..gonna till some of the yard up and plant clover

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dusting powder Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: dusting powder Posted by: heide
» Harmful to chickens too? Posted by: PaulK
» RE: dusting powder Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: dusting powder Posted by: heide
» RE: dusting powder Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: dusting powder Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: dusting powder Posted by: photon's feather
» Use Ag Sulfur Posted by: eboy
The article does not tell the whole story
Posted by: solrev on Apr 16, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thirty years ago, there were nearly 4 million bee colonies in the U.S. Today, fewer than 2.5 million remain, thanks to a reddish-brown parasite so tiny it could stand on the head of a pin, and to a malady so new no one is sure of its origin. The beekeeper's biggest enemy in recent years, however, has been a miniature, blood-red arachnid called the varroa mite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most recent research
Posted by: justAnEgg on Apr 16, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excerpt from Potential cure found for honey bee colony collapse, Examiner.com, Apr. 15:

In a study published in Environmental Microbiology Reports, researchers analyzed the environment of two apiaries (also known as bee yards) and found that the parasite Nosema ceranae was inflicting havoc on the bee populations. Nosema ceranae is a microsporidian (a fungi-related creature) that is capable of causing nosema, which is the main cause of honey bee illness and death. As it was only just discovered in 1996, little is known about how the parasite works, but luckily, the antibiotic flumagillin was able to completely clear the parasite from the bee colonies, leading to a full recovery of the apiaries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Typical journal report. Posted by: heid
i'm no fan of the pesticide industry, but...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Apr 16, 2009 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
spanish scientists claim to have found and cured colony collapse syndrome in a recent article at science daily. they blame it on a parasite nosema ceranae (microsporidia) and have cured it with antibiotics...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another way that greedy beekeepers push too far
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 16, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beekeepers have discovered that the size of the manufactured honeycomb cells determines the size of the bee, which determines the amount of honey each bee brings in.

I'm not saying that pesticides aren't a prime suspect, but the spread of Verroa Mites in hives has also been linked with colony collapse disorder. Commercial beekeepers have been using slightly larger honeycomb cells, which has led to big honey yields but it also makes the colony far more susceptible to Verroa Mites. The mites have more chance to get into a larval cell before the worker bees seal the cell. The mites also have an extra day to reproduce inside the larval cell, creating a stronger vector of reinfestation.

We can do little about dumbness in commercial beekeepers. Let half of them go broke?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bees' knees
Posted by: willymack on Apr 16, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about other parts of the country, or what the disappearance of European honeybees portends, but here in Klamath county,Oregon, there hasn't been a shortage of honeybees, either the European variety or our own native bees. I'm talking about the WILD ones here. The other day when the temperature temporarilly zoomed up to 60 degrees, my pussy willow bushes came into full flower, and were FULL of both kinds of bees. Since then it's been miserably cold, and no bees have been evident. I'm sure that in a couple of days, when it warms up again, the bees will re-appear. There is farm land just a block from my house, and huge piles of gypsum adjacent to the fields, awaiting distribution by the farmers. Fertilizer will be next, followed by herbicide and pesticide applications, usually by crop dusters. In the ten years I've been here, bees have been plentiful, so I don't know if the disapperrance from other areas has a chemical origin, or a viral or parasitic one, or what.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The death of the bee, will be the death of me.
Posted by: linecrosser on Apr 16, 2009 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ideal that the government has known about this problem for decades and has done nothing about it is wrong. The government supports the ideal of a massive bee kill off, thats why they haven't done anything to stop it. Why would the government want this to happen? The death of the bees will create food shortages, which will create havoc and massive deaths due to starvation. Why would the government large death tolls from starvation. First understand that a large portion of the government will never here their bellies growl. They'll be insulated from hardship caused by the bees dying, and they will use the crisis has a way to increase their power over a decreasing population, and they won't have anyone pointing fingers at them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The most perfect insecticide already exists and has
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on Apr 16, 2009 3:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
existed for millions of years but will never be used. What insect attacks the cocoa plant? None, the plant evolved an alkaloid to keep insects away. Power cocaine diluted to just over the strength found in the plant will kill mosquito larvae on contact. Takes a little longer to kill all other insects. The other benefit is since it is an alkaloid, acid rain and it neutralize each other. Can you imagine trying to get permission to spray a field with liquid cocaine to kill insects? Not going to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "cocoa" or "coca" Posted by: Jeanne
beekeeper
Posted by: cougars62960 on Apr 16, 2009 5:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, beekeepers use synthetic pyrethroids to kill the varroa mite. These are fat soluble and accumulate, I suppose, in the wax, not the honey. I have not seen any reports of study of this hypothesis. Personally, since I don't sell honey, I use an unapproved miticide for this purpose (it is used in Israel). What I use could end up in the honey (water-soluble), but since I don't treat them during excess honey production (what I use), I don't worry about it. They do get disoriented more than from normal smoke treatment, so I hope it wears off by the morning. This is practiced in the spring and fall, when no honey is being collected for human use.
Also, powdered Sevin dust acts a lot like the encapsulated insecticides and should be avoided. Occasionally I use the emulsion form for bag worm spot treatment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: beekeeper Posted by: rjs0
beekeeper
Posted by: cougars62960 on Apr 16, 2009 7:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just to clarify my point, the wax soluble pesticide is likely to accumulate with each pesticide application since the enzymes that would degrade them are not present in the wax (much like spilled crude oil is resistant). A water soluble pesticide has the potential to end up in your honey, but it is more likely to be degraded and disappear from the hive components. Enjoy your 'natural' beeswax candles, maybe they will repel the mosquitoes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Testing 1-2-3
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Apr 16, 2009 11:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to test these insecticides and see what they really do. Something highly toxic to bees can not be good. Bees are the very foundation of our food chain. No bees, no vittles.

On the other side of this, my old cat got a really bad tick infestation on her tender areas of her neck and chin. She was in bad shape and there wasn't much that we could do. Frontline took care of it in a week. It was that or lose my dear friend of 15 years.

I am very grateful that the stuff saved my cat, but very wary of its use. Rule number one. Don't screw with the bees. If this stuff and it's metabolites are "Highly Toxic" to bees, and have a one year half life, it should not be even considered for widespread use.

I want to see more testing and scrutiny, preferably by objective labs, not Bayer, Monsanto etal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Without reading the article,
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Apr 17, 2009 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I will read the article, I object to the title.

It isn't "our addiction" to pesticides. That pesticide has been banned in Europe already. I read about that many months ago on www.organicconsumers.org. Why hasn't it been banned here? I believe the German government has also sued the manufacturer of it.

Your title blames the american people for the revolving door between big business and government here, which is why the bee-killing pesticide along with many other things which are harmful to both wildlife and humans, are allowed to continue to be manufactured and used.

Grrr!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change You Can Believe In
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Apr 17, 2009 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, where is the moron who Obama made Secretary of Agriculture. Let's have some change.

Bees aren't as sexy as climate change, but they are much more real, and the damage to food and the environment is much more quantifiable.

Today, Obama's hack director at EPA claimed that among other alleged disasters, hurricanes are caused by global warming, although experts at the National Hurricane Center have denied this again and again. But the Obama ag experts can't even deal with the bee problem which is a simple cause and effect situation, unlike the complex climate problem which could have many causes. I love it.

Michelle has a garden and bees have been assaulting the White House. Maybe they are trying to say something to the Ivy League Obama couple who never planted anything in their privileged lives. Like, "stop murdering us, you yuppie idiots!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Privilege is relative Posted by: Jeanne
Cannabis-based pesticides and UV-Bees
Posted by: P.E.A.C.E. on May 8, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too many variables to point source bee die-offs. Combination of toxins and general havoc in the atmosphere impacting immune response, etc. UV-B radiation is increasing, toxins increasing... bees decreasing. What to do? Use hemp based pesticides and crop rotation instead of chemicals.
Check out my blog for more info.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement