Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

A Solar Revolution May Be Coming to Your Town

By Mariah Blake, Washington Monthly. Posted April 11, 2009.


A little-known policy is turning sleepy central Florida into a green energy hub. Could it do the same for America at large?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This winter, as Congress was scrambling to pass the stimulus package, the bottom fell out of the renewable energy sector -- the very industry that lawmakers have held out as our best hope of salvaging the economy. Trade groups like the American Wind Energy Association, which as recently as December was forecasting "another record-shattering year of growth," began predicting that new installations would plunge by 30 to 50 percent. Solar panel manufacturers that had been blazing a trail of growth announced a wave of layoffs. Some have since cut their workforces in half, as stock prices tumble and plans for new green energy projects stall.

But there is one place where capital is still flowing: Gainesville, Florida. Even as solar panels are stacking up in warehouses around the country, this city of 120,000 is gearing up for a solar power boom, fueled by homegrown businesses and scrappy investors who have descended on the community and are hiring local contractors to install photovoltaic panels on rooftops around town.

One of those investors is Tim Morgan, a tall fiftysomething man with slicked-back hair and ostrich-skin boots who owns a chain of electrical contracting companies. His industry has been hit hard by the downturn, but he has a plan to salvage his business, which he explained over a drink at the Ballyhoo Grill, a gritty Gainesville bar with rusty license plates nailed to the wall and Jimmy Buffett blaring on the jukebox. Morgan intends to rent roof space from eighty Gainesville businesses and install twenty-five-kilowatt solar generating systems on each of them, for a total of two megawatts -- a project that would nearly double Florida’s solar-generating capacity. He estimates the venture will cost between $16 million and $20 million and bring in $1.4 million a year. Already, he has lined up financing, found local contractors to do the installation, and staked claims to the rooftops of at least fifty businesses. "And we’re just one tiny player," he told me. "Look around. You can see how fast this thing is going to move."

Indeed, around Gainesville similar projects abound. Paradigm Properties, a residential real estate company, plans to install photovoltaic arrays on fifty local apartment buildings and its downtown headquarters. Achira Wood, a custom carpentry outlet, is plastering the roof of its workshop -- roughly 50,000 square feet of galvanized steel -- with solar panels. Interstate Mini Storage is doing the same with its sprawling flat-roofed compound. Tom Lane, who owns ECS Solar Energy Systems, a local solar contractor, told me he’s planning to expand his staff from eleven to at least fifty. "The activity we’ve seen is just explosive," he said. "I’ve been in the business thirty years and I’ve never seen anything like it."

Why is the renewable energy market in Gainesville booming while it’s collapsing elsewhere in the country? The answer boils down to policy. In early February, the city became the first in the nation to adopt a "feed-in tariff" -- a clunky and un-descriptive name for a bold incentive to foster renewable energy. Under this system, the local power company is required to buy renewable energy from independent producers, no matter how small, at rates slightly higher than the average cost of production. This means anyone with a cluster of solar cells on their roof can sell the power they produce at a profit. The costs of the program are passed on to ratepayers, who see a small rise in their electric bills (in Gainesville the annual increase is capped at 1 percent). While rate hikes are seldom popular, the community has rallied behind this policy, because unlike big power plant construction -- the costs of which are also passed on to the public -- everyone has the opportunity to profit, either by investing themselves or by tapping into the groundswell of economic activity the incentive creates.

Though Gainesville is the first to take the leap, other U.S. cities are also moving toward adopting feed-in tariffs. Hawaii plans to enact one this summer, and at least ten other states are considering following suit. Among them is hard-hit Michigan, where Governor Jennifer Granholm has promised that the policy will help salvage the state’s economy and create thousands of jobs by allowing "every homeowner, every business" to become "a renewable energy entrepreneur." There is also a bill for a federal feed-in tariff before Congress.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, renewable energy, clean energy, solar

Mariah Blake is an editor of the Washington Monthly. This story is part of a "Big Ideas" series published in partnership with the New America Foundation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Carbon Tax
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 13, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the arguments one hears over and over is that wind and solar energy are more expensive than carbon-based fuel derived energy. However, current pricing fails to reflect the immense cost of the environmental consequences of fossil fuel use. If, therefore, we added a carbon tax to fund alternative energy and remediation programs, market forces would push us into greener energy sources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Germany surges ahead, while the US is caught up fighting a fairtale al Qaeda!
Posted by: pfgetty on Apr 13, 2009 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As usual, the world surges ahead with new ideas and new technology, especially green technology, and the US still prides itself being the leader in the fight against make believe terrorists around the world.
When are we going to get off this nonsense of spending our money and energy and our policies all on militarism?
I guess one day we will have to awaken to the fact that Americans, through the press, have been conned into spending their national treasury for the enrichment of the military complex.
One way to reverse all this? Show the world the big con game that continues: the fight against terrorism..........and to do this, show the lies of 9/11.
Our present day militarism and costs for war are continuing because the American people still accept all of it because they are petrified of terrorism. And this is because of the lies of 9/11.
Expose those lies, and the American people will demand a complete overhaul of where we spend our money. And maybe we can again get in the game of working for the future, for the betterment of all.

But it will take the media to expose 9/11. The msm won't do it. It is left up to alternative media, like Alternet, to do it. But Alternet and the rest have all decided they will not present the truth of 9/11. Seven and a half years, and no coverage of all of the evidence and analyses done by pariotic brave Americans showing 9/11 was an inside job.

Alternet needs to change course and begin exposing 9/11, and pushing for a new way to use our money and power, before we don't have any left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's holding up alternative energy?
Posted by: willymack on Apr 13, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you spell OIL, kiddies? How about GAS, or COAL?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's ok we know whats important
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even though we are way behind in green engery production thtas not what important to real Americans. We got to keep the Gays from getting married.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come on people. It's all just greenwashing going on.
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Apr 13, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell what solar panels are made of and you'll know how much fossil fuels we still have to waste. Besides, without hemp or algae for fuel, all this going green is just bunk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feed-in Tariffs policy as a sort of sound, reliable pension plan
Posted by: hsr0601 on Apr 13, 2009 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under Feed-in Tariffs policy, the household outfitted with sustainable energy system may be seen as a sort of sound, reliable pension plan increasing the value of the house considerably, leading to renewed construction boom.
In my mind, it might bring back the much-anticipated economic growth as a cornerstone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FL power suppliers are fighting this tooth & nail!
Posted by: AngryGranny on Apr 14, 2009 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since Gov. Charlie Crist announced this state would pursue serious green goals, those who are profitting greatly from things the way they are, are determined to fight him! The power lobby is fighting him, not cooperating! They don't want to give up their huge profits the old school way--dinosaur coal-fired, liquid gas, scary dangerous expensive nuke! I get nothing but alarmist propaganda from my supplier, SECO (Sumter Elec. Coop) in newsletter form every month w/ my bill. I wrote to the CEO asking him to CUT IT OUT! and I got more propaganda back from him! Cliff Stearns brags in his newsletter that HE is the big hero cause he got FL to reverse the court ban on building a new coal-fired plant north of here in Putnam county--the last thing we need! Progress Energy (now a NC corporation) thinks they are going to dun ratepayers for ten years before opening a second nuke plant next to the first one in Crystal River! We don't want more nuke plants--they are ungodly expensive energy producers and very dangerous-look at all the accidents kept secret in France! In the meantime, the multi-billion $ salaries and bonuses continue, paid for by the peasants--that's you and me! The powerful energy lobby owns the FL legislature, along with the developers. Gainesville is one bright progressive spot in all of Florida! It's one big ponzi scheme, Florida! Thanks a bunch, Jeb!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Live in Gainville? Here is your man
Posted by: reelectnoone on Apr 14, 2009 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you live in the area here is your guy. Wayne Irwin, Pure Solar. wayne@pureenergysolar.net.

I met with him recently and the systems are far better than in the past.

Florida still needs to change one aspect of the law. Currently if you are not an individual and you sell power you must be a utility company subject to regulations. What's the rub?

Most cannot afford to pay the up-front costs for solar despite nice rebates. Contractors cannot lease you a system under the present law because that makes them a utility company under present definition.

Florida needs to amend that law to permit private solar contractors to install and lease systems to people who don't have deep pockets yet who would benefit from solar's savings.

When the law was enacted this was not an issue and was never considered. At that time only utility companies sold electrical power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Frustrated in Arizona
Posted by: cactus on Apr 14, 2009 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in southern Arizona and I have watched rooftops replace 1000s of acres of truly lush desert. It totally boggles my mind that there aren't solar panels on (almost) every rooftop but I personally know of only one person who has had them installed. Why? Because the government doesn't offer anything in the way of true assistance in covering the initial price AND if you do install panels the majority of the electric companies buy your extra electricity back at about half the price of what they charge for it. Not to mention all the special surcharges and fees, that are tacked onto your bill. Right now when we receive our electric bill the cost of the electricity we use is less than the extra charges and it is that way about 10 months out of the year. We would love to go all solar but we can't afford to do so the way it's set up now. Aaaaaargh!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Net Metering helps
Posted by: Nogginthink on Apr 21, 2009 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
States like NJ have policies for Net Metering where the utility must purchase the excess power your alternative energy systems generate at retail rates. That sounds great (and it is) but the downside is that if you produce more power than you consume you basically lose it to the utility. My guess is that the utilities aren't big fans of feed-in tariffs because they'll lose control of their revenue streams.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement