ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 27

The Earth Is a Ponzi Scheme on the Verge of Collapse

Our model of exponential growth in consumption of energy, natural resources and raw materials cannot last forever.
April 28, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Bernie Madoff sure made a name for himself, didn't he? First he made a name for himself as a "Wall Street Genius" whose coveted firm not only promised, but consistently delivered, extraordinarily high annual returns on investment, even when the economy was down. More recently he made a name for himself as the architect of the largest and most notorious "Ponzi Scheme" in history, bilking investors out of as much as 50 billion dollars!

So what is a Ponzi scheme, anyways? A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that promises, and delivers (at least for a while) exceptionally high and consistent financial returns to investors. These returns are paid to its investors from their own money, and the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from any actual profit earned by bona fide income generating investments (such as manufacturing, mining, or rental income). In ways similar to "pyramid schemes" or "chain letters", in order for a Ponzi scheme to work, it must continuously attract an ever increasing pool of investment from unsuspecting customers, in order to provide an ever increasing supply of money to draw upon to maintain payments to its ever increasing pool of investors. The trick is to promise such glorious results that the greed factor overcomes its victim's common sense as they turn a blind eye to the fact that the scheme lacks a solid foundation and can't go on forever. It is absolutely critical to the success of all Ponzi schemes that an aura of respectability and impeccability be maintained for as long as possible, for as soon as suspicions spread concerning the fraudulent nature of the business, new investments dry up and the Ponzi scheme collapses, since it has no source of true earned income with which to maintain payments to investors.

So, is it true that we are running our planet like a Ponzi scheme? And if this is true, does it mean that we must inevitably face collapse, as all Ponzi schemes must eventually end in catastrophe?

The illusion that the "Free Market" is the logical savior of our world has been maintained by the promise of riches and an ever increasing standard of living and lifespan that has been demonstrated by the industrialized world for the past several hundred years. On the surface, who can look at the apparent success of America, and not come to that quick conclusion? However, when you look deeper, you will find that this success is built on a business model based upon exponential growth, and that this growth must be fed by a similar exponential growth in consumption of energy, natural resources, raw materials, and in the continuous expansion to new markets. All of this is well and good when the world has an abundant supply of undeveloped lands and unused resources, but it starts coming apart as that same world approaches its natural limits to growth and consumption.

Our world-wide Ponzi scheme got its start with the industrial revolution in Western Europe, and it was colonialism that provided ever increasing sources for the raw materials and markets that kept this giant Ponzi scheme rolling. It spread to America with the colonial takeover of vast untapped resources and huge tracts of lands previously occupied by Native American hunter-gatherers. As America industrialized, its population grew and its resources were drawn down, the giant Ponzi scheme continued to grow through globalization and it continued to feed its ever growing appetite by drawing down the natural resources in the world's oceans, forests, and more remote areas, and by expanding it markets into the farthest reaches of the globe. We are witness to a five hundred year run on this giant ever-expanding global Ponzi scheme, and unless we change the way we are playing this game, that run is now drawing dangerously close to a natural and catastrophic conclusion.

Here is a brief summary of a few current trends that illustrate my point:

1. Trees: About 1/2 of the world's forests are already gone (most were cut in the last 50 years), and a significant percentage of the rest are in trouble. At the current rate of destruction, it has been estimated that the world's rainforests will be completely eliminated within forty years. Trees play a necessary role in stabilizing our planet's weather, atmosphere and soils. A single large mature tree has the evaporative surface area on its needles or leaves equivalent to a 40 acre lake. A process called "desertification" occurs near areas that have been deforested once the trees stop recycling moisture back into the atmosphere to fall as rain somewhere down wind. A recent study shows that deforestation contributes roughly 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions every year.


Matthew Stein is the author of When Technology Fails: A Manual for Self-Reliance, Sustainability, and Surviving the Long Emergency, from Chelsea Green.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: sustainability, earth


Comments are closed-

But...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 28, 2009 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But can we actually have true sustainability and keep industrialism?

Yes, we can make our energy sources greener, but what about all of the pollution and runoff and the despoiling of nature for resources in the first place?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But... Posted by: greenknight
» ok... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Recycling Posted by: ahmlco
» RE: But... Posted by: PaulK
» and my point is... Posted by: JoshuaLudd

Comments are closed-

Closed System
Posted by: ahmlco on Apr 28, 2009 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course we need to be smarter about what we consume and how, but many of the doomsday facts and scenarios in the article assume that the Earth is a closed system, and that the resources we have are ALL that we have.

And that assumption is false-to-fact.

Terawatts of solar energy strike our planet each and every day. We simply need to make use of it. As to resources and raw materials, we have an entire solar system full of them.

The biggest fallacy lies in the statement, "For the rest of the world to live as we do in the US..." But why make that assumption when even here in the US we're changing how we live?

Solar, wind, hybrids, biofuels, desalination, recycling. We have the tools and the technologies.

We simply need to reach out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 40 Years Posted by: ahmlco
» Well... Posted by: JoshuaLudd

Comments are closed-

Word to your Malthus
Posted by: angry_liberal on Apr 28, 2009 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who called attention to this problem more than a century ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Wake Up America!
Posted by: marsmath on Apr 28, 2009 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.crrh.org/

http://hemporganic.com/whyhemp.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ulyssesmsu
Posted by: ulyssesmsu on Apr 28, 2009 8:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
absolute nonsense--environmental alarmism in the extreme.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uh, okay.... how? Posted by: JoshuaLudd

Comments are closed-

Too late . . . too late . . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 28, 2009 9:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, you're just catching on? Besides Thomas Malthus a century ago, about forty years ago this warning was put out again by "The Limits to Growth" by The Club of Rome and "The Population Bomb" by Paul Erlich, and we were discussing this very subject on college campuses around the nation THEN.

The result? Nothing.

Considering the power wielded by moneyed interests and industrial conglomerates – those who cannot see anything past their next quarterly statements and bloated bank accounts – it will take massive catastrophe for a wake up call, even now.

This news has been out of the bag for a long time, but nobody's really listening. Instead, they're turning "being green" into just another profit center, with advertising slogans and "products in the pipe."

We're just going to have to learn to adapt to the world we have created, like it or not. The profit motive, like a blood-sucking vampire, cannot be killed by ordinary means, and, once it can no longer feed upon us, it will feed upon its own entrails. It will take the power of Earth itself to bury this monster. Make no mistake about it: if we continue as we have, Earth WILL scrape us off and start over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Limiting Idiots Posted by: ahmlco
» RE: Limiting Idiots Posted by: dingham
» RE: Yep Monkey... Posted by: The Butcher

Comments are closed-

Economists, please repeat after me: "Growth Is Unsustainable"
Posted by: iforgetwho on Apr 29, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's always amazing to me to hear NPR radio interviews where both parties just assume that the solution to every economic problem is more Growth. A child could tell you that in the long run growth of anything has to stop -- its food run low, its environment is spoiled, or it simply runs out of space.

Long run has become short run for our species on this planet.

Ecomomists, policymakers, and journalists please repeat after me: "Growth is not the answer, Growth is the problem."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

You keep saying this, but it keeps not happening.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Apr 30, 2009 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should I buy into these old tired Malthusian scare tactics?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Endgame
Posted by: PaulK on May 1, 2009 9:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The endgame of a Ponzi scheme is to keep the money circulating right up to the last minute. The Bernie Madoff character pretends that everything is normal. Then a payment is missed and everything collapses.

The environmental endgame is when the oil disappears, the industrialized countries run to coal, tar sands (although much of the oil produced from tar sands is burned up in extracting tar sands), corn for fuel (although corn requires as much oil to produce as it gives out in fuel) and nuclear (although more oil is burned in the nuclear cycle than would be if you just burned it for electricity). As a result, the air gets more Venus-like, the ocean gets more acidic and loses its ability to absorb and transform carbon dioxide, the forests all die off and burn, creating even more CO2, the arctic melts, releasing gigatons of methane, and then earth heats up a lot faster, which feeds in a big cycle. We get a bang while we get a diminishing buck.

Like an heiress who is suddenly foreclosed upon and penniless, we may choose to continue our old dilettante lives as best we can inside a cardboard refrigerator box in the alley, at least while we don't feel intense hunger pangs. Everything is all right. The world will get better, real soon, just around the corner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

But...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 28, 2009 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But can we actually have true sustainability and keep industrialism?

Yes, we can make our energy sources greener, but what about all of the pollution and runoff and the despoiling of nature for resources in the first place?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But... Posted by: greenknight
» ok... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Recycling Posted by: ahmlco
» RE: But... Posted by: PaulK
» and my point is... Posted by: JoshuaLudd

Comments are closed-

Closed System
Posted by: ahmlco on Apr 28, 2009 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course we need to be smarter about what we consume and how, but many of the doomsday facts and scenarios in the article assume that the Earth is a closed system, and that the resources we have are ALL that we have.

And that assumption is false-to-fact.

Terawatts of solar energy strike our planet each and every day. We simply need to make use of it. As to resources and raw materials, we have an entire solar system full of them.

The biggest fallacy lies in the statement, "For the rest of the world to live as we do in the US..." But why make that assumption when even here in the US we're changing how we live?

Solar, wind, hybrids, biofuels, desalination, recycling. We have the tools and the technologies.

We simply need to reach out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 40 Years Posted by: ahmlco
» Well... Posted by: JoshuaLudd

Comments are closed-

Word to your Malthus
Posted by: angry_liberal on Apr 28, 2009 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who called attention to this problem more than a century ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Wake Up America!
Posted by: marsmath on Apr 28, 2009 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.crrh.org/

http://hemporganic.com/whyhemp.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ulyssesmsu
Posted by: ulyssesmsu on Apr 28, 2009 8:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
absolute nonsense--environmental alarmism in the extreme.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uh, okay.... how? Posted by: JoshuaLudd

Comments are closed-

Too late . . . too late . . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 28, 2009 9:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, you're just catching on? Besides Thomas Malthus a century ago, about forty years ago this warning was put out again by "The Limits to Growth" by The Club of Rome and "The Population Bomb" by Paul Erlich, and we were discussing this very subject on college campuses around the nation THEN.

The result? Nothing.

Considering the power wielded by moneyed interests and industrial conglomerates – those who cannot see anything past their next quarterly statements and bloated bank accounts – it will take massive catastrophe for a wake up call, even now.

This news has been out of the bag for a long time, but nobody's really listening. Instead, they're turning "being green" into just another profit center, with advertising slogans and "products in the pipe."

We're just going to have to learn to adapt to the world we have created, like it or not. The profit motive, like a blood-sucking vampire, cannot be killed by ordinary means, and, once it can no longer feed upon us, it will feed upon its own entrails. It will take the power of Earth itself to bury this monster. Make no mistake about it: if we continue as we have, Earth WILL scrape us off and start over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Limiting Idiots Posted by: ahmlco
» RE: Limiting Idiots Posted by: dingham
» RE: Yep Monkey... Posted by: The Butcher

Comments are closed-

Economists, please repeat after me: "Growth Is Unsustainable"
Posted by: iforgetwho on Apr 29, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's always amazing to me to hear NPR radio interviews where both parties just assume that the solution to every economic problem is more Growth. A child could tell you that in the long run growth of anything has to stop -- its food run low, its environment is spoiled, or it simply runs out of space.

Long run has become short run for our species on this planet.

Ecomomists, policymakers, and journalists please repeat after me: "Growth is not the answer, Growth is the problem."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

You keep saying this, but it keeps not happening.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Apr 30, 2009 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should I buy into these old tired Malthusian scare tactics?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Endgame
Posted by: PaulK on May 1, 2009 9:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The endgame of a Ponzi scheme is to keep the money circulating right up to the last minute. The Bernie Madoff character pretends that everything is normal. Then a payment is missed and everything collapses.

The environmental endgame is when the oil disappears, the industrialized countries run to coal, tar sands (although much of the oil produced from tar sands is burned up in extracting tar sands), corn for fuel (although corn requires as much oil to produce as it gives out in fuel) and nuclear (although more oil is burned in the nuclear cycle than would be if you just burned it for electricity). As a result, the air gets more Venus-like, the ocean gets more acidic and loses its ability to absorb and transform carbon dioxide, the forests all die off and burn, creating even more CO2, the arctic melts, releasing gigatons of methane, and then earth heats up a lot faster, which feeds in a big cycle. We get a bang while we get a diminishing buck.

Like an heiress who is suddenly foreclosed upon and penniless, we may choose to continue our old dilettante lives as best we can inside a cardboard refrigerator box in the alley, at least while we don't feel intense hunger pangs. Everything is all right. The world will get better, real soon, just around the corner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS