Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Thousands Storm Capitol Hill in Largest Protest Against Global Warming

By Jason Mark, AlterNet. Posted March 3, 2009.


Climate change -- for many years the concern of scientists and policy wonks -- has finally birthed a broad-based citizens movement.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Blaine O'Neil believes he and his friends are on to something big -- namely, saving the world.

"Climate change is more than a life-or-death issue -- it's a life-or-death issue for the next infinite generations," says the 19-year-old, a biology major at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania. "We need to show Congress that we need climate legislation now and that green jobs are the way to go. We can't keep living off of this short-term fossil-fuel energy. We need immediate and aggressive change; it's simply the only choice we have left."

O'Neil, along with 30 others from Swarthmore, was among an estimated 12,000 people -- mostly college students -- who descended on Washington over the weekend to demand sharp cuts in the country's greenhouse gas emissions. For environmentalists, the three-day-long mobilization was a convergence of superlatives.

Organizers called a grassroots lobbying drive on Monday "the biggest lobbying day on climate and energy" in the country's history as they enlisted some 4,000 students to visit nearly every congressional office. And later that day, in what activists dubbed "the largest mass civil disobedience on climate" in the U.S., some 2,500 people blockaded the gates of the Capitol Power Plant, which burns coal to provide heat to the senators' and representatives' offices, a symbol of the nation's reliance on fossil fuels.

The grassroots energy displayed in the Capitol appears to mark an important turning point for the environmental movement. Climate change -- for many years the concern of a narrow circle of scientists and inside-the-Beltway policy wonks -- seems to have finally birthed a broad-based citizens movement. The numbers prove the point: Powershift, the 12,000-person conference that organized the lobbying day, attracted 5,000 students at its 2007 gathering 14 months ago; the first such meeting of campus climate activists, in 2005, had fewer than 200 attendees.

For author-activist Bill McKibben -- whose seminal book about global warming, The End of Nature, was published before many of the Powershift participants were born -- the emergence of a muscular social movement demanding carbon-dioxide reductions is long overdue.

"I've been waiting 20 years to see what the climate change movement would look like, and it looks great," McKibben, one of the initiators of the power plant action, told AlterNet. "We've got a lot to do. And the reason we're doing this protest is to give [President Obama] the political space he needs to maneuver, to show him that people care. Because the fossil-fuel industry doesn't want to give him any space."

The popular pressure is coming just in time. In December, leaders from around the world will gather in Copenhagen, Denmark, to negotiate an international treaty to replace the Kyoto Accords. With greenhouse gases continuing to accumulate in the atmosphere, and ecosystems already showing stress from rising temperatures, environmentalists warn that the Copenhagen negotiations will be a do-or-die.

And there is unlikely to be any meaningful progress at the talks unless the U.S. plays a leadership role. Green groups, therefore, believe it's essential for Congress to pass some kind of ambitious climate legislation before the world's leaders arrive in Copenhagen.

Gus Speth, a former environmental advisor to Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton and now dean of the Yale School of Forestry, says that 2009 will be a "hinge of history."

"Far too many members on the Hill don't feel sufficient political pressure," he told AlterNet. Speth was among the prominent environmentalists -- along with farmer-writer Wendell Berry and climatologist James Hansen -- who risked arrest at the power plant protest. "They [Members of Congress] get the science, that's not difficult. I think what we've been missing is a protest movement in this country, a powerful welling of grassroots support. Real citizen power: That has been the missing ingredient."

The recent actions in Washington, then, are a crucial test of eco-muscle. Will green groups succeed in persuading politicians to put strict limits on greenhouse gases? Or will entrenched fossil-fuel industries be able to successfully defend their longtime privileges?

The student swarming the congressional offices, and the protestors surrounding the Capitol Power Plant on Monday, seemed determined to prove that they are ready to make the sacrifices demanded for success. The night before, the sky had dumped three inches of snow, and temperatures throughout the day were frigid, punctuated by occasional flurries. But the climate activists were undeterred by the storm.

Despite the icy weather, the people surrounding the power plant were jubilant, dancing and bouncing to keep themselves warm and chanting slogans, such as: "Climate change / What's the solution? / A green jobs revolution" and the elegantly simple, "Coal stinks."

Many of those at the protest seemed heated by a feeling that the political dynamics are turning in their favor. Last year, for example, environmentalists scored a major victory when Democratic lawmakers removed longtime auto industry ally Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., from his chairmanship of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee.

The December coal slurry spill at a Tennessee Valley Authority power plant has put the coal industry under heightened scrutiny and is raising new questions about coal's dangers from extraction to ignition to disposal. And President Barack Obama has signaled that his administration will play a leading role in crafting any agreement that comes out of Copenhagen.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, bill mckibben, coal, james hansen, powershift, coal plant, capitol climate action, powershift09

Jason Mark is the co-author of Building the Green Economy: Success Stories from the Grassroots. He edits the magazine Earth Island Journal, published by Earth Island Institute, the fiscal sponsor of the Energy Action Coalition.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Vitally important to keep such mobilizations up.
Posted by: -matti on Mar 3, 2009 1:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us not look for short-term "results" in this.

Let us instead see a longer-term creation of "political space" in this.

Overt demonstrations of the Democratic Will CAN counteract the logic of previous agendas.

it is only whether they WILL in this case that is open for dispute.

My general advice for the upcoming period is:

You go something to say? SAY IT.

-matti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» toxic solution Posted by: chrysalis124812
L'Hyaim Jim Hansen You Cute Dupechik You!
Posted by: edgar1 on Mar 3, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 'climate change' movement: A hysterical mass movement based on partial readings of historical evidence and hypothetical computer modelsthat will trigger an unfortuate backlash against action against genuine problems proven by balanced research blike water supply, clean air and the chemicals we put in our industrial and consumer products.

The taxes on workers and small businesses unleashed by the climate change fanatics will of course not be paid by big business. The Wall St hedge fund racketeers will worship at the feet of Al Gore and Barack Obama who are about to give these moneychangers a new racket with which to chisel the world. Cap and trade. Bernie Medoff is back in business folks!
A Happy Hannukah on Wall St next year!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: L'Hyaim Jim Hansen You Cute Dupechik You! Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com
» RE: BUt WHY, Edgar? Posted by: Crazy H
and Climate Deniers Laugh
Posted by: EinMD on Mar 3, 2009 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as half a foot of snow is dumped on the area.

But wait... what's the temp supposed to be for Wednesday, Thursday and Friday of this week?

Mid to upper 40's and 50's possibly as high as 60.

But that's ok because they know that the 27,000 plumbers, architects, electricians and bus drivers they have as 'scientists' trump people actually studying climate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: and Climate Deniers Laugh Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: and Climate Deniers Laugh Posted by: uncleeddie
robbpa
Posted by: robbpa on Mar 3, 2009 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Goodness, according to all accounts the crowd was estimated at between 2000, to 2500. A far cry from the 12,000 you reported.

Are you sure you were not counting a few shivers and shakes here and there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: robbpa Posted by: kevcon
The Not-So-Nutty Professor
Posted by: DavidMichaelSmith on Mar 3, 2009 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Professor Stephen Schneider’s Stanford University office looks as if it might implode if one more book is added to its already voluminous contents. Every shelf is filled. Piles of precariously balanced publications rise like man-made stalagmites from the floor. My camera crew staggers around the stacks and columns, somehow managing to set in place the gear needed for the interview. When at last we begin, the professor, a member of the university’s Department of Biological Sciences and a Senior Fellow with the Stanford Institute for International Studies, speaks with the conviction born of a man who has done his research. As the author of eight books on various aspects of global climate change, he knows his subject matter by rote infused with passion.

“If I speak in front of a group of say, 500 people, I ask how many have ever had a fire in their house,” he says, staring intently into the camera. “Usually, a few hands go up. Then I ask how many have fire insurance. Every hand raises. “Why is it, then.’ I ask, ‘that you are willing to gamble with the planet’s one life support system when the odds are much greater that it will suffer the consequences of global warming than the chance that your house will burn down?’”

The professor has an unusual talent for an academician. He knows how to translate complex scientific data into terms that laymen can grasp. More than that, he has the ability to motivate his listeners to eschew despair for constructive action. On two aspects of the topic, he is uncompromising. First, the debate is over, he says. Or at least it should be.

“My colleagues are amazed when they hear someone say, ‘I don’t believe in global warming.’ Their reaction is the same as mine. ‘What do you mean you don’t believe? This isn’t a matter of belief, it’s a matter of evidence.’” Then there is the matter of what the evidence reveals. Professor Schneider says this part of the debate is also no longer debatable. “Global warming is the collective result of billions of individual decisions to use the atmosphere as an un-priced sewer to dump our wastes.”

There are, of course, “natural” factors that come into play in the rise of the earth’s atmospheric temperature by an average of 10 Fahrenheit over the past few decades. Clearly, modernization is the primary culprit. The conclusions of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change confirm both of Schneider’s contentions. The Convention’s web site (http://unfccc.int/2860.php) makes it clear.

“Against the background of the most conclusive scientific evidence to date that the warming of the climate system is unequivocal and accelerating, the Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Yvo de Boer, calls for speedy and decisive international action to combat the phenomenon.”
A tad more bureaucratic in language than that used by Professor Schneider, but unambiguous. Instead of a mere 10 rise in average global temperatures, the Convention predicts increases between 30 and 100. Those searching for hard data beyond the anecdotal can glean the troubling facts from the Convention’s scientific and verifiable documentation.

As dreary as it all sounds, Professor Schneider says there is reason for hope. While we cannot put the carbon and other greenhouse gas genies back into their industrial bottles, we can slow the rate of change. “We can invent our way out of this problem exactly the way we invented our way into it. There will be new jobs and new businesses, if we have the collective political will to act.”

It is not inconsistent to address climate change and to improve the economic prospects of people everywhere, according to Schneider. The key words in the professor’s optimism are “political will.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Not-So-Nutty Professor Posted by: uncleeddie
Friggin hilarious..
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Mar 3, 2009 11:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The irony is so rich in this one that I have been giggling about it for two days. Pardon me while I roll around on the floor and kick and pound my fists laughing... A bunch of impressionable tools shivering their asses off protesting global warming in a snowstorm. The Gore effect lives on in sweet rich living color.

As for those out there freezing, the guy is right, go do something productive. You are shivering while the corporates laugh at their tools advocating a corporate/govt controlled tax and scarcity market on the very air that they breathe and most forms of energy. Good Lord Bevis, get an education.

When it comes right down to it, yes we need to be cleaner. CO2 is not what you should be concerned about. It is a trace gas(0.038% of the atmosphere). It is a trace gas, nothing more. In the past it has been has high as 5%.

You could stop all coal fired power plants and petrol usage and return us to the 1800s. It would have about as much effect on the climate as outlawing phillips screwdrivers and macaroni noodles, except that the green way would cause a lot of famine, poverty, economic destruction, suffering, and many resulting deaths. The corporates would be laugfhing allof the wayto the bank.

If you want to do something about global warming, figure out how to cause it. It will be very handy knowledge soon, Mr Maunder.

3...2...1... TOOLS ATTACK!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Friggin hilarious.. Posted by: Crazy H
Remember Bush
Posted by: uncleeddie on Mar 4, 2009 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember when George W. Bush was attacked for never being able to utter the phrase "global warming" but instead would call it "global climate change". I guess Al Gore and the rest of the criminal global warming liars saw some logic in George's ideas as that is the phrase they now use. I wonder why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sound bytes do not suffice Posted by: chrysalis124812
» RE: Sound bytes do not suffice Posted by: uncleeddie
» RE: Sound bytes do not suffice Posted by: chrysalis124812
» RE: emember Bush Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: emember Bush Posted by: FreeAmerica
» RE: emember Bush Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: emember Bush Posted by: uncleeddie
It's time to make free energy our next grass roots victory
Posted by: Jibbguy on Mar 4, 2009 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way to fix our economy AND environment at the same time is to rejuvenate our manufacturing sector. There is nothing greater we can do to create jobs, increase tax revenue (and thus stabilize the Dollar and the world's financial markets), and lower unemployment to World War Two levels. This will change everything: Suddenly it is "Main Street" that is driving the economy with truly free enterprise... Not "Wall St."

And there is nothing better to manufacture than alternative energy devices that provide utterly clean, cheap, and abundant energy. The technology for these energy-producing devices all ready exists: We are just not allowed to know about them... Mainly because they would jeopardize trillions in easy profits for the energy cartels and international banks; and end the strangle-hold they have over us all.

NOW is the time to tell our elected officials that we demand disclosure on the alternative/"free energy" technologies, that we want them to be studied rigorously by our Universities, that we want to see the shelved and "secretized" patents released for use, that we want the MSM to start reporting on them.

Those interested in doing something to change the current energy paradigm that is destroying us and the planet please start here:


It's time to make free energy our next grass roots victory

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few points..
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Mar 4, 2009 9:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You will not hear me argue that we could not use cleaner energy, only that the CO2 demon is a scam.

There are a lot of alternative energies out there already, and yes Exxon and BP probably have the proverbial 100 mpg carburetor patented and locked down.

The hard part is to open those patents without crippling innovation. Companies will not put billions into R&D only to have their competetor make it cheap a week later because they did not have the expense of developing it. A middle ground might be in order where after so many years, the patent would go to a flat rate royalty and go public.

There is also a lot of stuff on the net about free energy. There is an excellent composting system that will heat your house if you feed it. You can build it for about $400.

Likewise, the ground is usually about 50ºF, and makes an excellent source of geothermal AC for the price of the water pumping once it is installed. There is a guy that set up air compressors on his car to capture the energy of the car braking, and used that compressed air as a boost when getting the car back up to speed. He got 80mpg using a 16hp lawn mower engine in his car.

Also worthy of research is our old friend Nic Tesla. He was indeed a sharp man, and many of his concepts & patents still are very useful. Personally I have plans to try to marry a small (Tesla design) boundary layer turbine and a solar boiler this summer to generate power from the sun. The bad news is that at 46ºN, we only get 4-5 hours of direct sun on average.

There is a lot of stuff that you can do now, but it costs. I would already have the good old photovoltaic solar if it was cost effective. In 15-20 years the $15-20,000 investment would reap benefits. Both the panels and batteries are really expensive.

The hydrolizer car in the article was a joke, right? It takes energy to crack water into it's components, and since both the internal combustion engine and the hydrolizer are only about 35% efficient, you will not come out ahead with that process.

We should not be crippling our economy with the corporate backed cap n trade schemes that will only increase energy costs and cause more problems in the name of false demon CO2. We would be a lot better off putting those resources into the next Tesla and getting those inventions out of the garage before Exxon cloak and daggers the guy and steals it.

Replies to above posters..
If you are studying climate, you are looking for more of a sinusoidal waveform, which you would want more than one data point to plot.

You should not confuse climate and weather. Just because we have a negative PDO & ENSO, declining GMT, a shrinking heliosphere, and a deepening solar minimum, doesn't mean that there will be no more heat waves. There is some debate going on to try to establish if some of the big changes in Younger Dryas were climate or weather, or none of the above, and rather an outside forcing like a metorite. That is a little longer time frame than a heat wave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hey
Posted by: fartmuffin on Mar 6, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
global warming is a giant hoax! its all about raising taxes, growing the government, and advancing liberalism! real climatologist disagree with left wing pseudo-scientists on this fraudulent issue! have a great day!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Typical rightwing bullshit. Posted by: maxpayne
Global Warming
Posted by: williamgeorge on Mar 6, 2009 11:57 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990’s to create an illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims.
=========
george
hawaii drug rehab

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Today's Robber Barons about to fully scour the planet
Posted by: editnetwork on Mar 8, 2009 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking of the behemoth power of the fossil fuel industry, I've just finished The Tyranny of Oil by Antonia Juhasz. I couldn't get into her previous book, but (especially on the heels of Endgame by Derrick Jensen) this one riveted me to the point of waking nightmares and raging letters to the editor.

It spotlights the core of our systemic problems: untrammeled and unapologetic greed, willful shortsightedness, and naked power to get one's own way (to elect and then corrupt those who will come through).

Together with this week's AlterNet story on Eli Lilly, I'm taken all the way back to Thom Hartmann's Unequal Protection: Collectively, we have got to do something about today's Robber Barons, or there won't be much left anywhere to plunder, let alone sustain (human) life at any scale.

I'm also taken back to the notion of single-term limits for our reps, at every level, enforced as a default option at the ballot box: When in doubt, vote 'em out. Especially if they have accepted and/or have not renounced any contributions from fossil fuel purveyors or their lobbyists.

How much clearer can it be? How simply must this be stated? STOP KILLING THE FREAKIN' PLANET! It's the only one we've got!

Okay, okay; I'll anticipate a picky objection. For 'planet,' read 'biosphere.' The planet will survive, one way or another. We -- that is, a place suitable for human habitation -- may not. And by now surely it's clear that industrial civilization based on cheap energy cannot go on much longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement