COMMENTS: 199
America's Love Affair with Really Soft Toilet Paper Is Causing an Environmental Catastrophe
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Americans have been long chastised for our environmental footprints (and for good reason). But the latest report from environmental groups including Greenpeace should give us major reason to pause. The Guardian could not have said it any better:
The tenderness of the delicate American buttock is causing more environmental devastation than the country's love of gas-guzzling cars, fast food or McMansions, according to green campaigners. At fault, they say, is the US public's insistence on extra-soft, quilted and multi-ply products when they use the bathroom.
The numbers are shocking: More than 98 percent of the toilet paper we use in the US is from virgin forests, the Guardian reports. Across the world, people are struggling to save our forests from deforestation, and instead of helping out, we're wiping are butts with our best defense against climate change. And until the time comes when Obama gets Congress to pass a TP Act, Greenpeace has some help for consumers, with a handy guide for getting some good toilet paper that won't harm the environment.
The New York Times explained why it is we insist on only the finest trees:
...Fluffiness comes at a price: millions of trees harvested in North America and in Latin American countries, including some percentage of trees from rare old-growth forests in Canada. Although toilet tissue can be made at similar cost from recycled material, it is the fiber taken from standing trees that help give it that plush feel, and most large manufacturers rely on them.
The Guardian explains why this phenomena is not worldwide, but seems to be an American experience:
Dave Dixon, a [Kimberly-Clark] company spokesman, said toilet paper and tissue from recycled fibre had been on the market for years. If Americans wanted to buy them, they could.
"For bath tissue Americans in particular like the softness and strength that virgin fibres provides," Dixon said. "It's the quality and softness the consumers in America have come to expect."
Longer fibres in virgin wood are easier to lay out and fluff up for a softer tissue. Dixon said the company used products from sustainbly farmed forests in Canada.
Americans already consume vastly more paper than any other country -- about three times more per person than the average European, and 100 times more than the average person in China.
Greenpeace launched a campaign to draw attention to why this might be a significant problem. The Times writes,
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Feb 27, 2009 9:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: no-zone
» i think ranchero specifically meant hemp toilet paper...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: i think ranchero specifically meant hemp toilet paper...
Posted by: no-zone
» That's what I was thinking.
Posted by: aonghus36
» OK, just as long as you're not saying eliminate toilet paper altogether!
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: sophiej
» What about going back to the corn cob.... hahaha
Posted by: Prophit
» other cultures think TP is disgusting and unsanitary
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: Libsrule
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aouie01 on Feb 28, 2009 1:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sincerely,
Aouie
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Water used in other cultures too.
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Water used in other cultures too.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Water used in other cultures too.
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Animal on Feb 28, 2009 1:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» how do the shells work?
Posted by: MobileSucks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gravity32 on Feb 28, 2009 2:54 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: waitingforgodel
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: Mr. G
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: Animal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Feb 28, 2009 3:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: DrBrian
» My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: Smackback
» Lets look at the "product" and if "no paper" is the way to go.
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: amerimet
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: amerimet
» RE: You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: TheLimit
» Terrytom “happiness is a clean break.” RE: You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: terryton
» But that wastes water, and it becomes "black water" after that usage
Posted by: Smackback
» Defense Contractor is synonym for "shitwater" Ha Ha
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: But that wastes water, and it becomes "black water" after that usage
Posted by: DrBrian
» RE: But that wastes water, and it becomes "black water" after that usage
Posted by: rotorooter
» RE: You don't need toilet paper.
Posted by: amerimet
» RE: You don't need toilet paper.
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Feb 28, 2009 3:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» can't find hemp t.p...bud did find tree free t.p.
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PJAW on Feb 28, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 98%
Posted by: ctuck622
» Actually, she didn't merely pull it out of her ass (pardon me for recycling your pun) ;-}
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: Actually, she didn't merely pull it out of her ass (pardon me for recycling your pun) ;-}
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TheLimit on Feb 28, 2009 7:46 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the price realistically reflected the cost, people would find better ways to get the job done. In truth, paper is incredibly abrasive, however soft it may feel when you squeeze it, and there are surely better strategies if we care to look for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 28, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having read this article, I am gratified that my arguments had an even better purpose.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Clogged Drains?
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tozemaga on Feb 28, 2009 6:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ng. Antonio Magalhaes
Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: ng. Antonio Magalhaes
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peppylapew on Feb 28, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Along with the recent change of regime, we seem to be witnessing an extreme makeover of media coverage. It's no less slanted than when Bush was Maximum Leader, only different. Instead of phony terrorists, now we are to fear environmental holocaust.
Plus ca change, baby ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Virgin Fiber" is what Guardian said, not "Virgin Forests"
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: "Virgin Forests" -- You'd better believe it.
Posted by: editnetwork
» RE: Priced hardwood lumber lately?
Posted by: TheLimit
» Jeez - you have to wonder what comment got censored on a TP story
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: judyfood on Feb 28, 2009 6:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I liked the water sprayer idea, any suggestions on how to install it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So much easier to clean the bathroom if "unversal design" is used
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: ftbrunswick
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: seandsky
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: Charlow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: corgyn on Feb 28, 2009 7:14 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Global Warming is not universally accepted
2. The savings and efficiency of most re-cycle efforts is questionable as well - much collected still goes to the dump.
I really don't care how they do it in India or France - if I wanted to act like either I would live there instead, You worry about how to wipe your ass and I'll wipe mine.
Oh and by the way, I do think that my soft, thick ass tissue is worth more that your costal home. Swim for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Nannyville hell"?? Dude/ette, try some Xanax -nm-
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: "Nannyville hell"?? Dude/ette, try some Xanax -nm-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: And we are not heading into Nannyville Hell
Posted by: monkeywrench
» Don't Tread On Me!
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Don't Tread On Me!
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Guess you are what you wipe...
Posted by: smadaj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Feb 28, 2009 7:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We do need a nanny state when adults reason and behave like tantrumy babies. Laws are welcome because they are the only way to deal with assholes like you who won't deprive themselves of a minimum of comfort no matter what their comfort costs to the rest of humanity or nature. Hey: asshole... toilet paper... ha ha ha! I made a funny!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: z on Feb 28, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each year I planted somewhere around a half a million seedlings on various locales (All the way from southern Mississippi to Maine). These plantings were made to produce pulp for the paper industry. I believe then, and still believe today, these plantings were a way to produce a useful product without harming the environment. On average, tree farming produces usable pulpwood sometime in the vicinity of twelve years of growth. Enough already about butt wiping and environmental cataclysms.... Find a more useful and critical subject to whine about.... like the upcoming water shortages which the capitalist enterprises will be sure to use to garner ever more ludicrous profits. Or the usurious practices of the banks which are opening check cashing stores at such a fast rate it is one of the most rapidly growing businesses in my home state.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sri Ricardo
Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Sri Ricardo
Posted by: rgd
» Recycled paper still makes sense
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: ...like the upcoming water shortages.. wonder how much water's used to make tp
Posted by: smadaj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: had-enough on Feb 28, 2009 7:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Looks suspiciously like an attempt to inflame the ignorant by obfuscating the language.
For years environmentalists (including me) have been fighting the fight to keep virgin forests intact ... virgin being synonymous for "old growth" forests or forests that have never been logged commercially.
Now, the word -- with its previous emotional baggage -- is being applied to any unrecycled fibers. Sorry, but that's the kind of intentional slippage I expect from the multinationals of the world, not so-called environmentalists.
Toward the (pardon the pun) bottom of this piece, it finally comes out that "virgin" in this context is wood from tree farms (generally fast-growing pine) that are renewable resources (and wonderful carbon traps).
Given the energy expended on recycling v. that expended on tree-farm harvesting, I doubt there's really much difference ... just an attempt by an increasingly profit-oriented, horribly cynical environmental industry to scare the, ummm, crap out of people. . ."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I call BS, not the human kind
Posted by: monkeywrench
» Not much of a farmer, are you?
Posted by: -matti
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mary MacElveen on Feb 28, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mary MacElveen
http://www.marymacelveen.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Feb 28, 2009 7:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who actually have the ability to think and understand what they read, it is an easy task to dig through the lies.
The green weenies have become ADDICTED to this process of hysterically screaming/whining about EVERYTHING we do.
Their favorite target of course, is America.
Not because we use more of whatever, etc.
Rather it's because America is the easiest money fountain to tap into.
I don't buy their bullshit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: LIES LIES LIES
Posted by: Lilykins
» Nah . . . only our GRANDCHILDREN will suffer!!!!
Posted by: mtnprivy
» i won't have grand kids cuz i don't have kids...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» You've never been to Canada before I assume.
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: You've never been to Canada before I assume.
Posted by: aonghus36
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kick on Feb 28, 2009 8:17 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: blinders off
Posted by: Rapunzel
Comments are closed-
Posted by: waves16 on Feb 28, 2009 8:34 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to address the cause of the problems rather than the symptoms. We have to change the incentive structure of markets so that green products are more profitable. Industries will shift naturally to them just as they rapidly did with renewable energy when it became profitable last summer. See http://wavesofthefuture.net/ for one such strategy.
Engaging markets by markets by changing the profitability equation could be a powerful avenue for the future. Regulations and cap-and -trade is not going to be enough.
Tags: global warming and environmental strategies,
eco-taxation
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How Are We Going to Police Toilet Paper
Posted by: TheLimit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peterjkraus on Feb 28, 2009 8:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gotta stop using trees, people. I live in Arkansas, where, according to a widely held belief, corn cobs are in widespread use.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TwoFeetLaw on Feb 28, 2009 8:53 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
linked text
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Feb 28, 2009 8:55 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the hypocrite libs really cared about trees they would ban ethanol that is responsible for the destruction of millions of acres of forestland.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't Tread on Me!
Posted by: bar5608
» bar5608 thanks for your informative reply
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: bar5608 thanks for your informative reply
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Feb 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt if many people realize that soft and fluffy is not a green way to go. If they did, many would make another choice. This is a good example of the "free market always does the right thing" philosophy being full of crap. The free market is not always very well educated and sales copy is a terrible teaching method.
I also agree with the folks who said that it is impractical to think that they REALLY make toilet paper out of true virgin forests and therefore this article is highly exaggerated. That is never acceptable.
That being said, I also think better paper alternatives should be explored. Not just on toilet paper but with paper towels, paper napkins, printer paper and other forms of paper. As a whole, paper milling is extremely hazardous to the environment and the process as a whole needs some changes. Personally, I limit my use of all forms of paper for environmental reasons. Paper towels are easy to replace with cloth.
Insisting on using soft and fluffy to wipe our butts despite environmental concerns is a prime example of Americans being the greedy, spoiled brats of the world. Come on folks. Give a little!
Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!
Luv,
Granny
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Derek Maddox on Feb 28, 2009 9:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drive across Alabama and Georgia. You can't help but see stand after stand of very closely spaced pine trees. They grow for a few years (far fewer than 300), then they're cut with a machine that looks like a big pruning shear, stacked on trucks, and hauled off to make paper.
Yes, the pulp fiber that goes into making toilet paper in the US is predominantly virgin pulp. Meaning that it has never been processed into paper before. But "virgin" does not mean that it came from an old-growth, virgin forest.
Stop lying to people, and stop advocating that the freedoms and civil rights of American citizens be taken away or violated.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: K-Bob Canuck
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: Shey
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: gilliani
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: Derek Maddox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RickW on Feb 28, 2009 10:12 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this is something that doesn't require hundreds of billions in "stimulus". Nor does it require days and weeks of "debate" in Congress. All it requires is an executive order, and immediate execution.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Cool One Decrees: NO SHIT! And it was done.
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: The Cool One Decrees: NO SHIT! And it was done.
Posted by: RickW
» Your Examples Prove You Are Wrong
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Your Examples Prove You Are Wrong
Posted by: RickW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaubladt on Feb 28, 2009 10:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Looking for Bidet
Posted by: aiis
» RE: Looking for Bidet
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Looking for Bidet
Posted by: Charlow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ftbrunswick on Feb 28, 2009 10:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.nrdc.org/land/forests/gtissue.asp
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ESPA on Feb 28, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't Tread "In" Me
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Don't Tread "In" Me
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kelly on Feb 28, 2009 10:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as you don't live in the Southwest, this isn't too earth-unfriendly and would at least reduce the amount of toilet paper needed (not to mention personal odors). Not sure how you're supposed to dry off, though.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bidet converter kit
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: Bidet converter kit
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: Bidet converter kit
Posted by: watergrl69
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jam on Feb 28, 2009 10:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine a lifetime of using this stuff -- no wonder these problems peak at 65 years old.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Feb 28, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it was a sit down toilet.
Being an old sod with a bit of a muscular problem - the hole where you squat - I've always had a bit of a problem with - sure its mainly psychological - but if you watch slumdog millionaire you may understand - what might happen if you get it wrong
So I had no toilet paper
But there was a source of water in the bog
So I crapped
And thought well - what do I do now?
I actually have to wipe my own anus with my own hand and actually feel my own shit
The supply of water made it much better
What the fuck do you do in the desert?
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That is why in Dessert Cultures...
Posted by: Pirate1
» RE: Water Ain't So Bad at Cleaning Your Bum
Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Water Ain't So Bad at Cleaning Your Bum
Posted by: wagner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Feb 28, 2009 11:21 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don’t tell your man what he don’t do right
Nor tell him all the things that make you cry
But check yourself for your own shit
And don’t be making out like it’s all his
Take a look around the world
You see such bad things happening
There are many good men
Ask yourself is he one of them
The deadliest of sin is pride
Make you feel like you’re always right
But there are always two sides
It takes two to make love, two to make a life
Take a look around the world
You see such mad things happening
There are few good men
Thank your lucky star that he’s one of them
Special Cases - Massive Attack
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sinead has got more talent and basic humanity then your little toe
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pirate1 on Feb 28, 2009 12:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ava1984 on Feb 28, 2009 12:37 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we not growing HEMP?! Crops of hemp could do so much to rescue our economy; grow it, tax it and use it in all of its myriad of uses! Is there a 6th grader in this country who doesn't get this; depends on who reared them, I guess.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alias246 on Feb 28, 2009 1:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nullipara on Feb 28, 2009 1:41 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: nullipara
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: gilliani
» Make it prescription only
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: Charlow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Feb 28, 2009 1:42 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I switched to Walgreen's knock-off of Scott's 1000 sheet one ply, which is not soft; I did it to save money, but I hope (and suspect) it's not a culprit ??
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cyr3n on Feb 28, 2009 2:40 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose there are some jackasses out there who apparently enjoy wiping their asses with money, walking around with tree pulp between their cheeks, and getting their hands covered in $#!t when their toilets back up. Bravo!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: raskwame on Feb 28, 2009 3:13 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Feb 28, 2009 3:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, using water instead of paper still faces the major problem of declining water supplies, so we also need to mandate the universal use of waterless, composting toilets. It is estimated that a single individual in the West flushes 2500 times a year, which at 1.6 gallons a flush is 4000 gallons times 300 million is over 1 trillion gallons of water that is wasted every year in the US, at least, given that most toilets use far more water.
Using composting toilets would also serve the additional purposes of (1) producing fertilizer, which would help declining stocks of fertilizer, and (2) return to us the sense that waste is useful and not "dirty" and low class.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One point...
Posted by: Kelly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Feb 28, 2009 4:29 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: darter22 on Feb 28, 2009 5:26 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Guilty....Your A Hole
Posted by: greatdanes
» RE: Guilty....Your A Hole
Posted by: darter22
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikebppa on Feb 28, 2009 5:47 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe in protecting the environment, but making things up is sheer nonsense.
Just one more argument to march us down the road of living like they do in Russia.
My standard line is becoming: WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!! So wake up already to the BS!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Virgin Forest Nonsense
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Feb 28, 2009 6:53 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love the double-quilting, the strength, and the impressive quality of top-shelf toilet paper.
To compromise the quality of my toilet paper is just a non-starter.
Life is too short to spend it using sub-standard paper.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I always choose Charmin (or a top-line equal)!
Posted by: EHarold
» Tell your Mom I said "Hi"
Posted by: AJR Journal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: darter22 on Feb 28, 2009 7:01 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dingleberries
Posted by: EHarold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greatdanes on Feb 28, 2009 7:33 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES.
In the next 5 years you won't even recognize America. We'll be living under a Dictatorship and Big Brother will be Every where you go. Marshall Law and Troops from Foregin countries will partole and police your neighborhoods. I doubt you'll be thinking about Toliet Paper because you won't have enough to eat in order to have any need for it.
Don't even think of trying to leave this " LIBERAL UTOPIA " you all Voted for....The Borders have been SEALED !
Now do you think Toliet paper is your Biggest Problem???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: EHarold
» YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS ! Indy Progressive whatever
Posted by: greatdanes
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: darter22
» YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS ! Talking Points
Posted by: greatdanes
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS ! Talking Points
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: wagner
» "Troops from Foregin countries will partole and police your neighborhoods"
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: H.R. Chuckn'stuff on Mar 1, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sheesh
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eaders Pay The Price For Alternet's Love Affair with Outrage
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: eaders Pay The Price For Alternet's Love Affair with Outrage
Posted by: EHarold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peppylapew on Mar 1, 2009 7:15 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But please address my thesis: if there is genuine scarcity, costs should too high for use as TP.
It's regrettable we can't live in a garden of Eden, pristine and somehow "virgin." But since we don't and can't, we need "tree farms," which are a form of recycling if you will, to produce "virgin" fibers. BTW, I love that word -- so loaded with connotation. Its use is an indicator that there is a propagandist at work.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Mar 1, 2009 7:43 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilaryuk on Mar 1, 2009 7:57 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Easy gestures make us feel good, but too often are essentially meaningless. Perhaps they are pushed by the middle classes in order to distract us from confronting the hard truth that the real answers involve substantive changes of life style. Too often, professional greens fail to examine issues in real life terms and neglect to examine the whole eco-impact chain. However, they are pretty good at making people like me (who has tried to be fairly green for years) think "sod it" and throw the cardboard in the general waste.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: asy answers not always green
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybud420 on Mar 1, 2009 11:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jack Herer, the "Emperor of Hemp" wrote The Emperor Wears No Clothes". You can read the entire book online at
linked text = http://jackherer.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hemp IS THE ANSWER
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: Hemp IS THE ANSWER
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: terryton on Mar 1, 2009 11:58 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kcdrew on Mar 1, 2009 1:31 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sheesh.
Let's "just do it".
Mo Rage
http://www.moravings.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: let's team up
Posted by: NorthLight
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Mar 1, 2009 1:35 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
failed forestcrop policies attest.
Clearcutting ruins the land and what's left of the woodlands and takes nearly a century to recover from if at all.
Julia Butterfly Hill fought to save sequoias from being turned into housing lumber. She saved a small amount of them. Of those she couldn't save,the wood was of such poor quality it was only good enough to make pencils. So you better respect that #2 pencil,it's over a thousand years old. Truth is there's no way the timber company didn't know the quailty of the wood they were taking down,they just got paid to remove it.
Trees have a much more important function than providing us with asswipe,writing paper and firewood. They clean the lower atmosphere of all the crud we pump into it. Convert CO2 into breathable air and draw in carbon from the air,and it's the lower atmosphere where it is we live.
Think of it this way... If you took out of your lungs very small pieces of them. not a lot but steadily took small pieces away without giving your lungs time to heal and repair themselves....just how long do you think you'd survive? 10 years? 20? Maybe you'd get lucky and live for 40 years,but at the end of that time you'd be out of breath just buttoning you shirt or working the zipper on you jeans. Then what would you do? You'd lament the folly of taking pieces of lungs out and wish you'd thought better of the idea.
That's exactly where we are at now. The Earth is a 'Living Planet' and we have fowled the air with our emmissions and removed much of our lung capacity...the trees.
If we don't get our collective act together we won't be wondering about buying our children the next hot new gaming system or Ipod replacement it will be which personal oxygen system we can afford.
I support a total and complete ban on logging for a least the next 200 years. We have plenty of other building materials to choose from and more than enough farmcrops that can make paper. Besides,if you're reading this,on this site,you just helped save more than one tree. Aren't you glad you're part of the solution.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Mar 1, 2009 1:52 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Mar 1, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Mar 1, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: politicky on Mar 1, 2009 2:47 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, this article made it seem like all Americans are worried about is soft, fluffy paper for their delicate rear ends.
Puhleeeeeeze!
The toilet paper I use is not soft, nor is it 2 ply, but it does last a month for 6 bucks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 1, 2009 5:16 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Mar 1, 2009 5:28 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bigger or first growth trees are not cut, or if they are after they die, they are quite revered for veneer and large lumber. They would never end up in a pulp mill.
Our area has dozens of paper mills and produces probably at least 2% of domestic paper including TP. It is probably 5x or 10x that. It is not virgin forest.
Most people around here are pretty happy about having vast forests producing pulp logs. Having 3% of it cut every year leaves millions of acres of habitat and recreational land as well as a lot of good paying jobs.
Some enviros wanted to stop it, and the result would have been selling the land for development. They were sent packing.
This lady sat in her office and made up some bullshit out of thin air, and now wants your money to fight her phantom problem.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phatkhat on Mar 1, 2009 6:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrcentrist on Mar 1, 2009 7:41 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oku_haiku on Mar 1, 2009 7:43 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
really, it's not that difficult to be a little smarter and little more "permanent" in our solutions to these problems.
and if your flannel toilet cloth is scratchy, well, chances are you grabbed a dirty piece!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: toilet cloth, the UNpaper
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ulyssesmsu on Mar 1, 2009 9:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your Ph.D.'s in Toilet-Paper-Metrics are unneeded and unwanted.
The real crimes here are being committed by over-zealous environmentalists who have too much time on their hands and too little to do, and so they spend their lives thinking of ways they can interfere with the lives of others by regulating the kind of toilet paper they use!
Find something useful to do!
Leave us alone!
We don't need you to tell us how to live our lives or what to do every second of the day.
You don't know what's best for everyone else!
RESIGN AS MANAGER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joebanana on Mar 1, 2009 10:02 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets take hemp for example, 1 acre of hemp produces 4.1 times the usable pulp of the same acre of hundred year old (or older)trees. So outlawing a plant based on voodoo science is a criminal act. All the crap the government spews forth about the harmful effects of hemp are lies. I know, you think I'm crazy, how could our government lie to anybody, let alone the "people"? Hello people, guess what I've found out, without much trouble, the fact that the government has suppressed such a beneficial substance under false law, is not the job of government, in fact the complete opposite of the role of government. the war on drugs has caused more harm and death, wasted more money, gives huge tax breaks to criminals, promotes drug availability in schools, and is just none of their damn business how I enjoy myself, as long as I don't cause harm. And it's all a lie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "I know, you think I'm crazy...
Posted by: watching-n-waiting
Comments are closed-
Posted by: watching-n-waiting on Mar 1, 2009 11:31 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And before I "go off" on my inevitable rant (can't help myself- I will repeat this stuff until it SINKS IN!) it bares noting that we're a pack of complete a--holes if we're REALLY this spoiled rotten while the care packages being sent by military families must routinely include (besides functional body amour) frikken toilet paper because Bushes military was THAT broken!
----------------------------------------------------------
The rant:
The MidWest is heating and drying up twice as fast as the rest of the world; the Colorado River no longer even reaches the sea! Oil is to our energy needs as trees and cotton are to our paper and clothing needs. In other words among the many exciting fuel alternatives we need to grow hemp! It's cheap to grow (thrives in drought conditions) and is very high profit.
We need to regard the decline of big-oil as a wonderful opportunity, an opportunity to lighten our footstep and embrace the change.
The Arctic ice cap will shrink more than 40 percent by 2050. In Antarctica a vast ice shelf, hanging on by a thin strip, will be the next chunk to break off from the Peninsula. An iceberg measuring 25 miles by 1.5 miles has broken away from The Wilken Ice Shelf. The entire ice shelf, about 6,180 square miles, is collapsing. It was predicted in 1993 that the northern part of the Wilkins Ice Shelf was likely to be lost within 30 years if warming continued at the same rate. The demise of the planet 50% AHEAD OF SCHEDULE!
With our innovative spirit and long history of manufacturing prowess The United States could be spearheading the solutions instead we're part of the axis of evil (America, China and Australia). But we can beat Exxon Mobile at their own game because, second only to Australia, America has the largest geothermal resources in the world (wind and solar capacity). Our beleaguered midwest is capable of producing enough wind-power to meet ALL of Americas electricity needs while the southwest could do the same (without the need for even a single rooftop solar panel) while also fueling a plug-in hybrid for every single American. PLUS: hemp thrives in dry conditions so, again, lets embrace the possibilities!
For a fraction of the cost of the "city-sized" "embassy we allowed Bush to build in Iraq, we could begin to upgrade our ancient power-transmission system so that we can deliver solar, wind and other renewable energy across the country thus becoming a "glowing example" and global inspiration! Aside from massively reducing global warming, of course, the added benefit would be restoring the shattered economy by boosting home bred industry- once the pride of our once great nation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peter g on Mar 2, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One is, that if you use a lot of toilet paper maybe you need to think about how you're eating.
I know when I eat well I need very little toilet paper. I call them clean poos.
The second is I have read one or two articles in the last year that toilet paper might be responsible for hemorroids. They pointed out that on the cellular level basicly what you have is tiny sharp splinters tearing away at your cells.
peter g
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Charlow on Mar 3, 2009 2:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the Japanese have pioneered in a new appliance called a washlet that replaces your toilet seat and has a simple plumbing connection that any person could do themselves and a plug into the wall. The washlet has a built-in device that with a push of a button on your wall, will wash you and dry you, so that most of the time you won't need any toilet paper at all, or if you insist on using some, only a sheet or two is necessary.
Since I got my washlets (ordered through one of the overstock websites), I'm using about 1 roll of toilet paper a month. And, I think that given the very small amount of water and electricity that the washlet uses, the net benefit from both a water and energy efficiency standpoint is great.
Plus, with washlets, you are much cleaner. Truly. Would you, after having some noxious substance poured or smeared on your face or hands, feel "clean" if you simply wiped said substance off with a tissue? I think not, so why should we think that we're clean by using toilet paper?
In Japan, washlets are now everywhere, even in public toilets. I think we need to get them too. That, in my opinion, is the only true solution to the US toilet paper obsession.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Mar 4, 2009 9:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: danstabel on Mar 7, 2009 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where I volunteer we make wooden masts for the world's heirloom ships. We would love to know where, locally anyway, one could find 300 year old trees (Douglas fir. Which is used in paper too.) as the Zodiac must be remasted soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Mar 7, 2009 4:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnorford on Mar 10, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have, said Gargantua, by a long and curious experience, found out a means to wipe my bum, the most lordly, the most excellent, and the most convenient that ever was seen.
and a few paragraphs further:-
Who his foul tail with paper wipes,
Shall at his ballocks leave some chips.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ranchero42 on Feb 27, 2009 9:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: no-zone
» i think ranchero specifically meant hemp toilet paper...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: i think ranchero specifically meant hemp toilet paper...
Posted by: no-zone
» That's what I was thinking.
Posted by: aonghus36
» OK, just as long as you're not saying eliminate toilet paper altogether!
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: sophiej
» What about going back to the corn cob.... hahaha
Posted by: Prophit
» other cultures think TP is disgusting and unsanitary
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: Paper From Hemp?
Posted by: Libsrule
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aouie01 on Feb 28, 2009 1:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sincerely,
Aouie
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Water used in other cultures too.
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Water used in other cultures too.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Water used in other cultures too.
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Animal on Feb 28, 2009 1:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» how do the shells work?
Posted by: MobileSucks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gravity32 on Feb 28, 2009 2:54 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: waitingforgodel
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: Mr. G
» RE: save half the trees
Posted by: Animal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Feb 28, 2009 3:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: DrBrian
» My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: Smackback
» Lets look at the "product" and if "no paper" is the way to go.
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: amerimet
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: My vegetarian and vegan experience left me with chronic diarrhea. Sorry to be indelicate.
Posted by: amerimet
» RE: You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: TheLimit
» Terrytom “happiness is a clean break.” RE: You may not need toilet paper if you eat right
Posted by: terryton
» But that wastes water, and it becomes "black water" after that usage
Posted by: Smackback
» Defense Contractor is synonym for "shitwater" Ha Ha
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: But that wastes water, and it becomes "black water" after that usage
Posted by: DrBrian
» RE: But that wastes water, and it becomes "black water" after that usage
Posted by: rotorooter
» RE: You don't need toilet paper.
Posted by: amerimet
» RE: You don't need toilet paper.
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Feb 28, 2009 3:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» can't find hemp t.p...bud did find tree free t.p.
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PJAW on Feb 28, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 98%
Posted by: ctuck622
» Actually, she didn't merely pull it out of her ass (pardon me for recycling your pun) ;-}
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: Actually, she didn't merely pull it out of her ass (pardon me for recycling your pun) ;-}
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TheLimit on Feb 28, 2009 7:46 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the price realistically reflected the cost, people would find better ways to get the job done. In truth, paper is incredibly abrasive, however soft it may feel when you squeeze it, and there are surely better strategies if we care to look for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 28, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having read this article, I am gratified that my arguments had an even better purpose.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Clogged Drains?
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tozemaga on Feb 28, 2009 6:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ng. Antonio Magalhaes
Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: ng. Antonio Magalhaes
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peppylapew on Feb 28, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Along with the recent change of regime, we seem to be witnessing an extreme makeover of media coverage. It's no less slanted than when Bush was Maximum Leader, only different. Instead of phony terrorists, now we are to fear environmental holocaust.
Plus ca change, baby ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Virgin Fiber" is what Guardian said, not "Virgin Forests"
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: "Virgin Forests" -- You'd better believe it.
Posted by: editnetwork
» RE: Priced hardwood lumber lately?
Posted by: TheLimit
» Jeez - you have to wonder what comment got censored on a TP story
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: judyfood on Feb 28, 2009 6:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I liked the water sprayer idea, any suggestions on how to install it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So much easier to clean the bathroom if "unversal design" is used
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: ftbrunswick
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: seandsky
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: CVS for TP from recycled paper
Posted by: Charlow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: corgyn on Feb 28, 2009 7:14 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Global Warming is not universally accepted
2. The savings and efficiency of most re-cycle efforts is questionable as well - much collected still goes to the dump.
I really don't care how they do it in India or France - if I wanted to act like either I would live there instead, You worry about how to wipe your ass and I'll wipe mine.
Oh and by the way, I do think that my soft, thick ass tissue is worth more that your costal home. Swim for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Nannyville hell"?? Dude/ette, try some Xanax -nm-
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: "Nannyville hell"?? Dude/ette, try some Xanax -nm-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: And we are not heading into Nannyville Hell
Posted by: monkeywrench
» Don't Tread On Me!
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Don't Tread On Me!
Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Guess you are what you wipe...
Posted by: smadaj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Feb 28, 2009 7:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We do need a nanny state when adults reason and behave like tantrumy babies. Laws are welcome because they are the only way to deal with assholes like you who won't deprive themselves of a minimum of comfort no matter what their comfort costs to the rest of humanity or nature. Hey: asshole... toilet paper... ha ha ha! I made a funny!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: z on Feb 28, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each year I planted somewhere around a half a million seedlings on various locales (All the way from southern Mississippi to Maine). These plantings were made to produce pulp for the paper industry. I believe then, and still believe today, these plantings were a way to produce a useful product without harming the environment. On average, tree farming produces usable pulpwood sometime in the vicinity of twelve years of growth. Enough already about butt wiping and environmental cataclysms.... Find a more useful and critical subject to whine about.... like the upcoming water shortages which the capitalist enterprises will be sure to use to garner ever more ludicrous profits. Or the usurious practices of the banks which are opening check cashing stores at such a fast rate it is one of the most rapidly growing businesses in my home state.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sri Ricardo
Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Sri Ricardo
Posted by: rgd
» Recycled paper still makes sense
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: ...like the upcoming water shortages.. wonder how much water's used to make tp
Posted by: smadaj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: had-enough on Feb 28, 2009 7:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Looks suspiciously like an attempt to inflame the ignorant by obfuscating the language.
For years environmentalists (including me) have been fighting the fight to keep virgin forests intact ... virgin being synonymous for "old growth" forests or forests that have never been logged commercially.
Now, the word -- with its previous emotional baggage -- is being applied to any unrecycled fibers. Sorry, but that's the kind of intentional slippage I expect from the multinationals of the world, not so-called environmentalists.
Toward the (pardon the pun) bottom of this piece, it finally comes out that "virgin" in this context is wood from tree farms (generally fast-growing pine) that are renewable resources (and wonderful carbon traps).
Given the energy expended on recycling v. that expended on tree-farm harvesting, I doubt there's really much difference ... just an attempt by an increasingly profit-oriented, horribly cynical environmental industry to scare the, ummm, crap out of people. . ."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I call BS, not the human kind
Posted by: monkeywrench
» Not much of a farmer, are you?
Posted by: -matti
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mary MacElveen on Feb 28, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mary MacElveen
http://www.marymacelveen.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Feb 28, 2009 7:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who actually have the ability to think and understand what they read, it is an easy task to dig through the lies.
The green weenies have become ADDICTED to this process of hysterically screaming/whining about EVERYTHING we do.
Their favorite target of course, is America.
Not because we use more of whatever, etc.
Rather it's because America is the easiest money fountain to tap into.
I don't buy their bullshit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: LIES LIES LIES
Posted by: Lilykins
» Nah . . . only our GRANDCHILDREN will suffer!!!!
Posted by: mtnprivy
» i won't have grand kids cuz i don't have kids...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» You've never been to Canada before I assume.
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: You've never been to Canada before I assume.
Posted by: aonghus36
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kick on Feb 28, 2009 8:17 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: blinders off
Posted by: Rapunzel
Comments are closed-
Posted by: waves16 on Feb 28, 2009 8:34 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to address the cause of the problems rather than the symptoms. We have to change the incentive structure of markets so that green products are more profitable. Industries will shift naturally to them just as they rapidly did with renewable energy when it became profitable last summer. See http://wavesofthefuture.net/ for one such strategy.
Engaging markets by markets by changing the profitability equation could be a powerful avenue for the future. Regulations and cap-and -trade is not going to be enough.
Tags: global warming and environmental strategies,
eco-taxation
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How Are We Going to Police Toilet Paper
Posted by: TheLimit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peterjkraus on Feb 28, 2009 8:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gotta stop using trees, people. I live in Arkansas, where, according to a widely held belief, corn cobs are in widespread use.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TwoFeetLaw on Feb 28, 2009 8:53 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
linked text
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Feb 28, 2009 8:55 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the hypocrite libs really cared about trees they would ban ethanol that is responsible for the destruction of millions of acres of forestland.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't Tread on Me!
Posted by: bar5608
» bar5608 thanks for your informative reply
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: bar5608 thanks for your informative reply
Posted by: bornxeyed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Feb 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt if many people realize that soft and fluffy is not a green way to go. If they did, many would make another choice. This is a good example of the "free market always does the right thing" philosophy being full of crap. The free market is not always very well educated and sales copy is a terrible teaching method.
I also agree with the folks who said that it is impractical to think that they REALLY make toilet paper out of true virgin forests and therefore this article is highly exaggerated. That is never acceptable.
That being said, I also think better paper alternatives should be explored. Not just on toilet paper but with paper towels, paper napkins, printer paper and other forms of paper. As a whole, paper milling is extremely hazardous to the environment and the process as a whole needs some changes. Personally, I limit my use of all forms of paper for environmental reasons. Paper towels are easy to replace with cloth.
Insisting on using soft and fluffy to wipe our butts despite environmental concerns is a prime example of Americans being the greedy, spoiled brats of the world. Come on folks. Give a little!
Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!
Luv,
Granny
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Derek Maddox on Feb 28, 2009 9:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drive across Alabama and Georgia. You can't help but see stand after stand of very closely spaced pine trees. They grow for a few years (far fewer than 300), then they're cut with a machine that looks like a big pruning shear, stacked on trucks, and hauled off to make paper.
Yes, the pulp fiber that goes into making toilet paper in the US is predominantly virgin pulp. Meaning that it has never been processed into paper before. But "virgin" does not mean that it came from an old-growth, virgin forest.
Stop lying to people, and stop advocating that the freedoms and civil rights of American citizens be taken away or violated.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: K-Bob Canuck
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: Shey
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: gilliani
» RE: Lies and more lies
Posted by: Derek Maddox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RickW on Feb 28, 2009 10:12 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this is something that doesn't require hundreds of billions in "stimulus". Nor does it require days and weeks of "debate" in Congress. All it requires is an executive order, and immediate execution.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Cool One Decrees: NO SHIT! And it was done.
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: The Cool One Decrees: NO SHIT! And it was done.
Posted by: RickW
» Your Examples Prove You Are Wrong
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Your Examples Prove You Are Wrong
Posted by: RickW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaubladt on Feb 28, 2009 10:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Looking for Bidet
Posted by: aiis
» RE: Looking for Bidet
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Looking for Bidet
Posted by: Charlow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ftbrunswick on Feb 28, 2009 10:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.nrdc.org/land/forests/gtissue.asp
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ESPA on Feb 28, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't Tread "In" Me
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Don't Tread "In" Me
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kelly on Feb 28, 2009 10:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as you don't live in the Southwest, this isn't too earth-unfriendly and would at least reduce the amount of toilet paper needed (not to mention personal odors). Not sure how you're supposed to dry off, though.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bidet converter kit
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: Bidet converter kit
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: Bidet converter kit
Posted by: watergrl69
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jam on Feb 28, 2009 10:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine a lifetime of using this stuff -- no wonder these problems peak at 65 years old.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Feb 28, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it was a sit down toilet.
Being an old sod with a bit of a muscular problem - the hole where you squat - I've always had a bit of a problem with - sure its mainly psychological - but if you watch slumdog millionaire you may understand - what might happen if you get it wrong
So I had no toilet paper
But there was a source of water in the bog
So I crapped
And thought well - what do I do now?
I actually have to wipe my own anus with my own hand and actually feel my own shit
The supply of water made it much better
What the fuck do you do in the desert?
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That is why in Dessert Cultures...
Posted by: Pirate1
» RE: Water Ain't So Bad at Cleaning Your Bum
Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Water Ain't So Bad at Cleaning Your Bum
Posted by: wagner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Feb 28, 2009 11:21 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don’t tell your man what he don’t do right
Nor tell him all the things that make you cry
But check yourself for your own shit
And don’t be making out like it’s all his
Take a look around the world
You see such bad things happening
There are many good men
Ask yourself is he one of them
The deadliest of sin is pride
Make you feel like you’re always right
But there are always two sides
It takes two to make love, two to make a life
Take a look around the world
You see such mad things happening
There are few good men
Thank your lucky star that he’s one of them
Special Cases - Massive Attack
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sinead has got more talent and basic humanity then your little toe
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pirate1 on Feb 28, 2009 12:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ava1984 on Feb 28, 2009 12:37 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we not growing HEMP?! Crops of hemp could do so much to rescue our economy; grow it, tax it and use it in all of its myriad of uses! Is there a 6th grader in this country who doesn't get this; depends on who reared them, I guess.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alias246 on Feb 28, 2009 1:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nullipara on Feb 28, 2009 1:41 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: nullipara
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: gilliani
» Make it prescription only
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: Try considering the health of others
Posted by: Charlow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Feb 28, 2009 1:42 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I switched to Walgreen's knock-off of Scott's 1000 sheet one ply, which is not soft; I did it to save money, but I hope (and suspect) it's not a culprit ??
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cyr3n on Feb 28, 2009 2:40 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose there are some jackasses out there who apparently enjoy wiping their asses with money, walking around with tree pulp between their cheeks, and getting their hands covered in $#!t when their toilets back up. Bravo!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: raskwame on Feb 28, 2009 3:13 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Feb 28, 2009 3:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, using water instead of paper still faces the major problem of declining water supplies, so we also need to mandate the universal use of waterless, composting toilets. It is estimated that a single individual in the West flushes 2500 times a year, which at 1.6 gallons a flush is 4000 gallons times 300 million is over 1 trillion gallons of water that is wasted every year in the US, at least, given that most toilets use far more water.
Using composting toilets would also serve the additional purposes of (1) producing fertilizer, which would help declining stocks of fertilizer, and (2) return to us the sense that waste is useful and not "dirty" and low class.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One point...
Posted by: Kelly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Feb 28, 2009 4:29 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: darter22 on Feb 28, 2009 5:26 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Guilty....Your A Hole
Posted by: greatdanes
» RE: Guilty....Your A Hole
Posted by: darter22
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikebppa on Feb 28, 2009 5:47 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe in protecting the environment, but making things up is sheer nonsense.
Just one more argument to march us down the road of living like they do in Russia.
My standard line is becoming: WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!! So wake up already to the BS!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Virgin Forest Nonsense
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Feb 28, 2009 6:53 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love the double-quilting, the strength, and the impressive quality of top-shelf toilet paper.
To compromise the quality of my toilet paper is just a non-starter.
Life is too short to spend it using sub-standard paper.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I always choose Charmin (or a top-line equal)!
Posted by: EHarold
» Tell your Mom I said "Hi"
Posted by: AJR Journal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: darter22 on Feb 28, 2009 7:01 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dingleberries
Posted by: EHarold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greatdanes on Feb 28, 2009 7:33 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES.
In the next 5 years you won't even recognize America. We'll be living under a Dictatorship and Big Brother will be Every where you go. Marshall Law and Troops from Foregin countries will partole and police your neighborhoods. I doubt you'll be thinking about Toliet Paper because you won't have enough to eat in order to have any need for it.
Don't even think of trying to leave this " LIBERAL UTOPIA " you all Voted for....The Borders have been SEALED !
Now do you think Toliet paper is your Biggest Problem???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: EHarold
» YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS ! Indy Progressive whatever
Posted by: greatdanes
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: darter22
» YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS ! Talking Points
Posted by: greatdanes
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS ! Talking Points
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: YOU ARE ALL F--KING NUTS !
Posted by: wagner
» "Troops from Foregin countries will partole and police your neighborhoods"
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: H.R. Chuckn'stuff on Mar 1, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sheesh
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eaders Pay The Price For Alternet's Love Affair with Outrage
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: eaders Pay The Price For Alternet's Love Affair with Outrage
Posted by: EHarold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peppylapew on Mar 1, 2009 7:15 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But please address my thesis: if there is genuine scarcity, costs should too high for use as TP.
It's regrettable we can't live in a garden of Eden, pristine and somehow "virgin." But since we don't and can't, we need "tree farms," which are a form of recycling if you will, to produce "virgin" fibers. BTW, I love that word -- so loaded with connotation. Its use is an indicator that there is a propagandist at work.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Mar 1, 2009 7:43 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilaryuk on Mar 1, 2009 7:57 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Easy gestures make us feel good, but too often are essentially meaningless. Perhaps they are pushed by the middle classes in order to distract us from confronting the hard truth that the real answers involve substantive changes of life style. Too often, professional greens fail to examine issues in real life terms and neglect to examine the whole eco-impact chain. However, they are pretty good at making people like me (who has tried to be fairly green for years) think "sod it" and throw the cardboard in the general waste.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: asy answers not always green
Posted by: richholland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybud420 on Mar 1, 2009 11:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jack Herer, the "Emperor of Hemp" wrote The Emperor Wears No Clothes". You can read the entire book online at
linked text = http://jackherer.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hemp IS THE ANSWER
Posted by: EHarold
» RE: Hemp IS THE ANSWER
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: terryton on Mar 1, 2009 11:58 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kcdrew on Mar 1, 2009 1:31 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sheesh.
Let's "just do it".
Mo Rage
http://www.moravings.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: let's team up
Posted by: NorthLight
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Mar 1, 2009 1:35 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
failed forestcrop policies attest.
Clearcutting ruins the land and what's left of the woodlands and takes nearly a century to recover from if at all.
Julia Butterfly Hill fought to save sequoias from being turned into housing lumber. She saved a small amount of them. Of those she couldn't save,the wood was of such poor quality it was only good enough to make pencils. So you better respect that #2 pencil,it's over a thousand years old. Truth is there's no way the timber company didn't know the quailty of the wood they were taking down,they just got paid to remove it.
Trees have a much more important function than providing us with asswipe,writing paper and firewood. They clean the lower atmosphere of all the crud we pump into it. Convert CO2 into breathable air and draw in carbon from the air,and it's the lower atmosphere where it is we live.
Think of it this way... If you took out of your lungs very small pieces of them. not a lot but steadily took small pieces away without giving your lungs time to heal and repair themselves....just how long do you think you'd survive? 10 years? 20? Maybe you'd get lucky and live for 40 years,but at the end of that time you'd be out of breath just buttoning you shirt or working the zipper on you jeans. Then what would you do? You'd lament the folly of taking pieces of lungs out and wish you'd thought better of the idea.
That's exactly where we are at now. The Earth is a 'Living Planet' and we have fowled the air with our emmissions and removed much of our lung capacity...the trees.
If we don't get our collective act together we won't be wondering about buying our children the next hot new gaming system or Ipod replacement it will be which personal oxygen system we can afford.
I support a total and complete ban on logging for a least the next 200 years. We have plenty of other building materials to choose from and more than enough farmcrops that can make paper. Besides,if you're reading this,on this site,you just helped save more than one tree. Aren't you glad you're part of the solution.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Mar 1, 2009 1:52 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Mar 1, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Mar 1, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: politicky on Mar 1, 2009 2:47 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, this article made it seem like all Americans are worried about is soft, fluffy paper for their delicate rear ends.
Puhleeeeeeze!
The toilet paper I use is not soft, nor is it 2 ply, but it does last a month for 6 bucks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 1, 2009 5:16 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Mar 1, 2009 5:28 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bigger or first growth trees are not cut, or if they are after they die, they are quite revered for veneer and large lumber. They would never end up in a pulp mill.
Our area has dozens of paper mills and produces probably at least 2% of domestic paper including TP. It is probably 5x or 10x that. It is not virgin forest.
Most people around here are pretty happy about having vast forests producing pulp logs. Having 3% of it cut every year leaves millions of acres of habitat and recreational land as well as a lot of good paying jobs.
Some enviros wanted to stop it, and the result would have been selling the land for development. They were sent packing.
This lady sat in her office and made up some bullshit out of thin air, and now wants your money to fight her phantom problem.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phatkhat on Mar 1, 2009 6:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrcentrist on Mar 1, 2009 7:41 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oku_haiku on Mar 1, 2009 7:43 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
really, it's not that difficult to be a little smarter and little more "permanent" in our solutions to these problems.
and if your flannel toilet cloth is scratchy, well, chances are you grabbed a dirty piece!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: toilet cloth, the UNpaper
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ulyssesmsu on Mar 1, 2009 9:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your Ph.D.'s in Toilet-Paper-Metrics are unneeded and unwanted.
The real crimes here are being committed by over-zealous environmentalists who have too much time on their hands and too little to do, and so they spend their lives thinking of ways they can interfere with the lives of others by regulating the kind of toilet paper they use!
Find something useful to do!
Leave us alone!
We don't need you to tell us how to live our lives or what to do every second of the day.
You don't know what's best for everyone else!
RESIGN AS MANAGER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joebanana on Mar 1, 2009 10:02 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets take hemp for example, 1 acre of hemp produces 4.1 times the usable pulp of the same acre of hundred year old (or older)trees. So outlawing a plant based on voodoo science is a criminal act. All the crap the government spews forth about the harmful effects of hemp are lies. I know, you think I'm crazy, how could our government lie to anybody, let alone the "people"? Hello people, guess what I've found out, without much trouble, the fact that the government has suppressed such a beneficial substance under false law, is not the job of government, in fact the complete opposite of the role of government. the war on drugs has caused more harm and death, wasted more money, gives huge tax breaks to criminals, promotes drug availability in schools, and is just none of their damn business how I enjoy myself, as long as I don't cause harm. And it's all a lie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "I know, you think I'm crazy...
Posted by: watching-n-waiting
Comments are closed-
Posted by: watching-n-waiting on Mar 1, 2009 11:31 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
