COMMENTS: 16
How You Can Green Your Home and Cash in on Stimulus Money
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Hampton Falls, N.H. -- Energy-saving systems for the attic, basement, and in between have effectively gone on sale, courtesy of the United States Congress.
But whether shoppers will take advantage -- or even notice available discounts -- remains an open question.
Tax incentives to encourage investments in energy efficiency took effect last week when President Barack Obama signed the $787 billion economic stimulus bill. That means homeowners with drafty windows, old heating systems, or other root causes of high energy bills can be rewarded in tax season if they make improvements in 2009 or 2010.
"This is by far the most the federal government has done in the past several decades" to reward energy-efficiency investments, says Steven Nadel, executive director of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit organization in Washington, D.C. "In many cases, this will make the high-efficiency product cheaper than the low-efficiency product. [For consumers], this is pretty lucrative, and I'd be surprised if it gets extended into 2011."
New incentives increase the size of tax credits for homeowners who buy qualifying products. For instance, those who invest in highly-rated insulation, replacement windows, duct seals, or high-efficiency heating and cooling systems can now receive a tax credit worth 30 percent of the upgrade cost (maximum credit value: $1,500).
Previously, homeowners could get a tax credit worth just 10 percent of an upgrade cost, up to a maximum of $500. Now, taxpayers who spend $800 on an efficient water heater, $1,000 on insulation, and $2,000 on windows could lop $1,140 off their federal tax bill.
Awards for switching to renewable energy sources have become especially generous. Congress this month did away with caps on 30 percent tax credits for homeowners who install solar panels, geothermal heat pumps, or windmills. Now a $24,000 investment to make a home solar-powered would generate a federal tax credit worth $7,200. (Before the stimulus, credits were capped at $2,000 for geothermal and solar; $4,000 for wind).
These tax code revisions have altered the affordability ballgame, says Craig Perkins, executive director of the Energy Coalition, a nonprofit in Irvine, Calif., that helps consumers become more energy-efficient. He estimates more than 1 in 4 Californians can now borrow to install solar panels and immediately be paying less out-of-pocket per month (including payments on solar panels) than if he or she were to keep getting power from conventional sources. Others, he says, will often recoup the costs of adding solar or high-efficiency air conditioning over a few years.
One key to maximizing savings, Perkins says, is to choose projects that qualify for a rebate from one's state or utility and are also eligible for a federal tax credit. Such "piggybacking" is both permissible and encouraged. The challenge: getting consumers to research options and take action.
"The problem we find constantly is that [navigating incentives] can be extremely confusing," Mr. Perkins says. "People don't want to become wonks about what's eligible and what isn't.… It's the nuts and bolts of making it happen that really stops a lot people."
Merchandisers are already moving to educate consumers about new tax benefits. At Home & Hearth, a heating stove dealer in Hampton Falls, N.H., manager Bob King was talking up tax credits with every customer hours after Congress passed the stimulus bill. Brochure in hand, Jim Marshall of Exeter, N.H., liked hearing from Mr. King in the store's parking lot that a new wood pellet stove would qualify. He'd like to make a switch and stop spending more than $300 per month for oil heat.
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: using on Feb 24, 2009 12:46 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perhaps articles should make it clear.....
perhaps it would be smart of each business person to have it written in the contract and state up fronet.....
so that we stupid people busy leading our lives.......do not miss out on upgrading our purchases...now..when tax credits are available
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilly7 on Feb 24, 2009 4:19 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this putting pearls on a sow's ear?
How much investment in these companies does this adminstration have?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I think you miss the point.
Posted by: -matti
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Feb 25, 2009 5:13 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how many of these products will be US made??? know we're tired of imported junk, so this is a golden opportunity... protectionism???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: excellent idea but...
Posted by: greenman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blondesprite on Feb 25, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The value of too many 401ks have been cut in half and pensions are disappearing by the boat loads.
Economic incentives (tax cuts) which leave out the so-called least among us, fail.
As another poster pointed out, credit markets are still frozen. Those who still have credit and jobs will be heavily weighing the up-front, short term cost and too many are insecure about the long-term security of their jobs.
A $1,500 rebate for a solar system (if one lives where it could be used effectively)which costs 40k is not an incentive. There are municipal hurdles (city and neighborhood restrictions) to installing wind equipment.
Due to the spike in energy costs, many of those who who were financially able have already installed energy efficient windows, caulked and sealed their windows & doors and added attic insulation or fans.
This plan also leaves out the millions who are paying exhorbitant rental costs due, in part, to the housing bust and foreclosures.
The greatest short term benefit to most would be mass transportation projects and upgrading our electricity grid.
Those who live in energy dependent economies (Alaska and the southern half of the country depends on oil & gas or coal) will give their last dime to lobbyists and politicians to prevent this.
Then there are the scams. Those who prey on the elderly and gullible. Millions of the of the actual beneficiaries of the stimulus tax incentives will be bilked out of their money by con artists promising bing returns on green investments or home improvements.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 25, 2009 7:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrSuess on Feb 25, 2009 8:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grkjr on Feb 25, 2009 9:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cybershaman on Feb 25, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're basically beating a dead horse here. The Average person needs a 50% increase in their wages to get out of the holes we've been forced to dig. This is what happens when you go well beyond what the 'free market'can bear. The system has been broken and these gimmicks won't do a damn thing.
Listening to Obama repeat the fiction that people 'bought more house than they could afford' and that we were all 'flipping' houses was painful in the extreme. People bought houses and then lost the jobs that were going to pay for them. They ended up taking a job for half of their previous wage because the good jobs all went overseas. PERIOD!!!
These idiots never seem to ask the REAL question of why people are defaulting on their debts. If they lived in the real world they would know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yep, you're right! We should just give up and cut taxes !!!
Posted by: hardwroc
» RE: Yep, you're right! We should just give up and cut taxes !!!
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pj1fwb on Feb 25, 2009 4:41 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So far??
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenman on Feb 26, 2009 11:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Face it, without a 30% incentive, solar PV just doesn't make sense. A typical Solar PV installation is going to cost $30,000 where I live, and a $2,000 tax credit is laughably small. But a $9,000 tax credit (30%) makes the payback for the system much much more realistic. And this is true for small scale projects like insulation in your attic, too. Spend $1,000, get a $300 tax credit and make up your net outlay of $700 in energy savings over, say, five years. After that, those energy savings are like money in your pocket, year after year. Plus, the money you spend on your project, whatever its size, keeps businesses and tradesmen going. So, please, quit'cher griping and do something constructive for a change!
Greenman
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please consider...
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: using on Feb 24, 2009 12:46 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perhaps articles should make it clear.....
perhaps it would be smart of each business person to have it written in the contract and state up fronet.....
so that we stupid people busy leading our lives.......do not miss out on upgrading our purchases...now..when tax credits are available
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilly7 on Feb 24, 2009 4:19 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this putting pearls on a sow's ear?
How much investment in these companies does this adminstration have?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I think you miss the point.
Posted by: -matti
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Feb 25, 2009 5:13 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how many of these products will be US made??? know we're tired of imported junk, so this is a golden opportunity... protectionism???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: excellent idea but...
Posted by: greenman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blondesprite on Feb 25, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The value of too many 401ks have been cut in half and pensions are disappearing by the boat loads.
Economic incentives (tax cuts) which leave out the so-called least among us, fail.
As another poster pointed out, credit markets are still frozen. Those who still have credit and jobs will be heavily weighing the up-front, short term cost and too many are insecure about the long-term security of their jobs.
A $1,500 rebate for a solar system (if one lives where it could be used effectively)which costs 40k is not an incentive. There are municipal hurdles (city and neighborhood restrictions) to installing wind equipment.
Due to the spike in energy costs, many of those who who were financially able have already installed energy efficient windows, caulked and sealed their windows & doors and added attic insulation or fans.
This plan also leaves out the millions who are paying exhorbitant rental costs due, in part, to the housing bust and foreclosures.
The greatest short term benefit to most would be mass transportation projects and upgrading our electricity grid.
Those who live in energy dependent economies (Alaska and the southern half of the country depends on oil & gas or coal) will give their last dime to lobbyists and politicians to prevent this.
Then there are the scams. Those who prey on the elderly and gullible. Millions of the of the actual beneficiaries of the stimulus tax incentives will be bilked out of their money by con artists promising bing returns on green investments or home improvements.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 25, 2009 7:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrSuess on Feb 25, 2009 8:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grkjr on Feb 25, 2009 9:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cybershaman on Feb 25, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're basically beating a dead horse here. The Average person needs a 50% increase in their wages to get out of the holes we've been forced to dig. This is what happens when you go well beyond what the 'free market'can bear. The system has been broken and these gimmicks won't do a damn thing.
Listening to Obama repeat the fiction that people 'bought more house than they could afford' and that we were all 'flipping' houses was painful in the extreme. People bought houses and then lost the jobs that were going to pay for them. They ended up taking a job for half of their previous wage because the good jobs all went overseas. PERIOD!!!
These idiots never seem to ask the REAL question of why people are defaulting on their debts. If they lived in the real world they would know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yep, you're right! We should just give up and cut taxes !!!
Posted by: hardwroc
» RE: Yep, you're right! We should just give up and cut taxes !!!
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pj1fwb on Feb 25, 2009 4:41 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So far??
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenman on Feb 26, 2009 11:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Face it, without a 30% incentive, solar PV just doesn't make sense. A typical Solar PV installation is going to cost $30,000 where I live, and a $2,000 tax credit is laughably small. But a $9,000 tax credit (30%) makes the payback for the system much much more realistic. And this is true for small scale projects like insulation in your attic, too. Spend $1,000, get a $300 tax credit and make up your net outlay of $700 in energy savings over, say, five years. After that, those energy savings are like money in your pocket, year after year. Plus, the money you spend on your project, whatever its size, keeps businesses and tradesmen going. So, please, quit'cher griping and do something constructive for a change!
Greenman
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please consider...
Posted by: peacefullaim1
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




