ENVIRONMENT  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 11

How Google Earth Is Helping to Save the Real Earth

From an Amazonian rainforest to a Santa Cruz Canyon, activists are discovering if you can map it, you can save it.
February 2, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

The map didn't make sense. It was one of those grainy, black-and-white topographical maps, the kind of 8 ½ x 11 photocopy you get in the mail to inform you of an upcoming construction project near your home. The kind you turn this way and that until you give up trying to figure out what it corresponds to in the real world and just toss it into the trash instead.

Rebecca Moore, however, did not toss this particular map. It was the summer of 2005, and the map came from a utility company that owned land in the Santa Cruz Mountains near her home. The map was titled "Notice of Intent to Harvest Timber." Moore thought that sounded like logging. She couldn't make heads or tails of the boundaries the map proposed to illustrate, but she was determined to figure out where the timber harvest was going to take place.

Moore, a computer programmer, had recently started playing around with digital mapping tools. Her original idea had been to plot the hiking trails in her local canyon. But after an ambulance took two hours to find a neighbor's house, her interest intensified. She learned that rescue workers were relying on 20-year-old hand-drawn maps that were badly out of date. Moore decided to put her new skills to use. She obtained parcel information from local county offices and, using GPS data, she plotted out all the homes and roads in the canyon. The result was a clear, professional-grade map, like the kind you'd buy in any bookstore. Local fire companies snapped it up.

So when Moore got the inscrutable utility company notice, she pulled out her favorite mapping tool, Google Earth. Google had recently acquired the software, which most people are familiar with as the free desktop application you can use to gaze at satellite pictures of your house. But Moore had been toying with the software since before Google acquired it. Most digital geographical information systems just offer the kind of flat topographical views you'd get in a typical hiking map. The Google Earth tool went further. It had satellite imagery, so you could see real pictures of what the land looked like, and its embedded 3-D geographic information allowed you to fly through landscapes as if you were in a helicopter. Moore was so excited about the potential uses for the software that she had recently joined Google as a technical lead for the product.

When Moore turned to her new employer's software to identify which parcels of land the utility company owned, she was acting only as a private citizen concerned about a local land use issue. But her effort to understand what was happening in her own backyard led to a breakthrough that has had worldwide ramifications for environmental and humanitarian organizations seeking to communicate the significance of their causes.

It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's Google Earth

Los Gatos Creek Canyon, where Moore lives, is the kind of place people move to specifically because they love and care about nature. Secluded houses sit on acres of redwood forest, which is also home to osprey, beavers and even the occasional mountain lion. Hiking trails run up and down the canyon slopes, and neighbors form bonds over communal responsibilities like maintaining the winding roads that lead to their homes. If loggers were going to be removing trees in the area, Moore wanted to know exactly where.

Moore dumped her parcel information into the software and looked for the utility company's land. The results alarmed her: it was a six-mile swath jutting straight up the canyon, right below private homes, schools and churches. The roads the loggers would take were a mess of hairpin turns. Just recently, a local woman's car had been crushed after logs had rolled off another logging truck. These are the roads kids use to walk to school, Moore thought. There will be more accidents.

The creek at the base of the canyon provides water for 100,000 people living in the mountains and in nearby Silicon Valley. Soil erosion from the logging would surely degrade water quality, Moore thought, if not gum up the filtration machinery altogether. Plus landslides were already common; the removal of so many trees would certainly precipitate more slides.

A little more digging revealed that the proposal wasn't even a one-time project. The utility company was seeking an ongoing permit that would allow them to remove redwoods and Douglas fir week in, week out, into perpetuity. It sounded like a bad idea to Moore, and also unnecessary. The proposal purported to be a fire-prevention plan, but from Moore's point of view, the old-growth trees targeted in the plan weren't a hazard. In the 1980s, for example, it was a stand of old-growth redwoods, with the fire resistance they'd built up over centuries, which had been credited with stopping a raging fire and saving many homes.

Moore soon learned she wasn't the only one in the canyon worried about the proposed logging project. A small group of her neighbors were already discussing the proposal's ramifications and exploring ways to fight it. Normally, community activists face an uphill battle in soliciting support for their causes. And in this case, the group, who adopted the name Neighbors Against Irresponsible Logging (NAIL), was told to expect defeat. The utility company was a pro at these kinds of battles, they were told, and the regulatory agencies usually approved these types of requests.

But in this particular David and Goliath showdown, the little guy had a secret weapon. Moore realized she could use Google Earth to take canyon residents on the equivalent of an aerial tour of the proposed logging site, helping them to understand the various risks of running such an operation so close to their homes and communities. Over the course of a weekend, Moore marked up the images in Google Earth, coloring in the land where the logging would take place, and inserting labels to denote well-known landmarks, like schools and playgrounds.

Moore unveiled her work at a community meeting in front of 300 neighbors who so tightly packed the room that some had to stand outside and watch through the windows. She began her tour in outer space with a view of the Earth floating in inky blackness. Then, Moore zoomed in on the planet, like the pilot of a spaceship. The United States came into view, then the West Coast, then the Bay Area, until Moore finally flew to the base of Silicon Valley. The image pivoted toward the local reservoir and then started flying up the canyon.

At first the audience was quiet. But as soon as Moore began to guide the room through the canyon they all knew, people started leaning forward. Real images of the actual trees, roads and buildings in their community popped up. The logging area was marked in a translucent red, clearly bumping up right next to the roads, homes and businesses where audience members lived and played. Using Google Earth's ruler tool, Moore showed them exactly how far logging would take place from their houses and communities. She showed them the locations of proposed helicopter landing pads for logs that couldn't be removed by truck and demonstrated how closely timber-laden choppers might pass the local day care center and schools.

"Within 10 minutes of looking at the flyover, people were saying, ‘We can't have this. This has to stop. We have to get active,'" says Terry Clark, a Los Gatos Creek neighbor and a member of the NAIL steering committee.

"I thought I was well-informed... but I nearly fell off my chair when I had a good look at [the] Google Earth presentation of the logging zone," resident Lisa Sgarlato wrote to a local magazine after the meeting. "This three-dimensional presentation gave an amazing topographic bird's eye view of how invasive the logging will be."

Soon Moore was schlepping her presentation to more community meetings as well as to sit-downs with local politicians. Area news organizations clamored for tape of the flyover to run in primetime. The area's state assembly member had been planning to travel to the land to take a look for himself. But the flyover gave him the tour he needed and confirmed his opposition to the project. Local papers wrote editorials against the logging plan. Even former Vice President and uber-environmentalist Al Gore signed NAIL's petition and issued a statement against the plan after seeing the flyover on a visit to Google.

"We didn't even have to try to convince people," says Clark, who had struggled with more conventional means of persuasion on previous neighborhood campaigns. "We just put [on the visualization], and they would automatically respond, ‘Oh yes, this has to stop.'"

Envisioning Solutions

Late last year, after numerous meetings and agency reviews, the utility company's permit request was denied. Ultimately, the ruling was made on the basis that the utility company owned too much land to qualify for the type of permit it was seeking. But organizers and supporters alike say the ability to provide an aerial tour of the impacted area played an essential role in keeping the plan in the spotlight and organizing community opposition.

"For policymakers or environmental activists, this kind of tool that allows you to accurately fly over a site is extremely useful," says the area's state assembly member, Ira Ruskin. "It obviates the need for a more arduous way of taking a look at things."

Following media coverage, environmental groups started contacting Moore to learn how they could use Google Earth for their own campaigns. At Google, Moore started setting up in-house programs to help non-profits. As demand continued to grow, the company began to realize there was an enormous opportunity to help organizations illustrate and advocate for their causes. In 2007, the company set up a new unit, Google Earth Outreach, to do just that — and tapped Moore to lead it.

The U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington has used Google Earth to disseminate information about what some are calling genocide in Darfur. Google Earth users can fly in on villages that have been destroyed and learn more about how many people have been displaced. An east coast non-profit has successfully used the tool to raise awareness about the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal coal mining in Appalachia and to generate support for a clean water bill in Congress. UNESCO has used it to call attention to endangered world heritage sites. And over the summer, Moore and a Google Earth Outreach team flew to South America to teach an indigenous Amazonian tribe how to use the tool's satellite images to spot illegal logging and mining activity on their land.

The tool can be used to envision potential solutions as well as to identify problems, Moore says. The Appalachia group, for example, used Google Earth to envision a future where mountaintops were covered with wind turbines, and to show how a renewable energy source like wind could produce far more energy over time than the finite amount of underlying coal.

The work has become a personal mission for Moore, whose environmental leanings germinated during childhood summers spent gamboling on her grandfather's property in upstate New York. "I want to work on making this tool available to everyone so they can use it to strengthen their communities and protect their environments," she says.

A strengthened community was just one by-product of the NAIL campaign. Previously, Los Gatos Creek Canyon residents had identified primarily with the specific neighborhood in which they lived. The flyover showed how all the neighborhoods were connected. "Google Earth made it possible for everyone to see what a close-knit community we are," Clark says. "It bound people together."

 

 

 

E.B. Boyd is a journalist based in San Francisco who, yes, has used Google Earth to look at satellite pictures of her home.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: google, conservation, maps, google earth


Comments are closed-

Google for Humanity!
Posted by: Mickey Allums on Feb 2, 2009 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thank E. B, Boyd for this story.
Google Earth has great potential for a common knowledge base, for global communities to share their concerns and visions.
Along with each student in schools across America being provided a computer, Google Earth should come bundled with it.
Mickey Allums, Killeen, Texas

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Next Map? How about one showing the graduation of projected sea level rise...
Posted by: gazooks on Feb 2, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and the catastrophic displacement of global population that results.

We don't have the option of dealing just with the mindlessness of environmental abuses on a local scale bad as they are.

Imagine what's in store when the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet slides;

Potential collapse of the WAIS (from Wikipedia)

Large parts of the WAIS sit on a reverse-sloping bed below sea level. The reverse slope, and the low isostatic head, means that the ice sheet is theoretically unstable: a small retreat could in theory destabilize the entire WAIS leading to rapid disintegration. Current computer models do not include the physics necessary to simulate this process, and observations do not provide guidance, so predictions as to its rate of retreat remain uncertain. This has been known for decades.

In January 2006, in a UK government-commissioned report, the head of the British Antarctic Survey, Chris Rapley, warned that this huge west Antarctic ice sheet may be starting to disintegrate, an event that could raise sea levels by at least 5 metres (16 ft). Estimates by others have ranged from 6 to 15 m (20–50 ft). Rapley said a previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report playing down worries about the ice sheet's stability should be revised.

"The last IPCC report characterized Antarctica as a slumbering giant in terms of climate change," he wrote. "I would say it is now an awakened giant. There is real concern." . Note that the IPCC report did not use the words "slumbering giant".

Rapley said, "Parts of the Antarctic ice sheet that rest on bedrock below sea level have begun to discharge ice fast enough to make a significant contribution to sea level rise. Understanding the reason for this change is urgent in order to be able to predict how much ice may ultimately be discharged and over what timescale. Current computer models do not include the effect of liquid water on ice sheet sliding and flow, and so provide only conservative estimates of future behaviour."

James Hansen, a senior NASA scientist who is a leading climate adviser to the US government, said the results were deeply worrying. "Once a sheet starts to disintegrate, it can reach a tipping point beyond which break-up is explosively rapid," he said.

A detailed map example posted on Google Earth under "Global Awareness" might just help further funding for intensified modeling and breadth of awareness of exactly where and what populations are affected.

To spur the programs so urgently needed to avert, if possible, an unprecedented tragedy of global scale would be no small contribution to humanity and the environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Housing development OKAY but logging BAD!
Posted by: bperkins on Feb 2, 2009 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with the overall idea of the piece. I find it illogical to suggest that logging is bad and housing development is okay. Don't housing developments in rural areas have negative environmental effects just as logging. At least trees grow back on logging sites where trees will never grow back in people's yard and under their new house.

I can't for the life of me understand how people don't make the connection between logging and their demand for houses. Especially new houses out in (formerly) rural areas. We should be concentrating our development in existing cities/towns. Stop new housing developments. Build with wood but build high rises. They build up to 8 stories tall in Europe with wood. Why does everyone in America want a single family house? Once we acknowledged that we can't ALL have a house in paradise because paradise will be lost, then we can starting thinking about how to develop solutions to our problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

How
Posted by: jeffr on Feb 2, 2009 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does someone get involved in something like this?

Anyone know?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Google Earth can also be use for solutions
Posted by: Cap'n Solar on Feb 2, 2009 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great article, which shows how Google Earth can be used to protect the environment. It can also be used actively to reduce impact from everyday activities. Already Google has instituted the ability to shorten routes, avoid traffic, and to map the automobile route that uses the least fuel. Even better is their work to encourage walking and the use of public transit in many cities.

Recent work has shown the same analysis for single destination trips could be used to optimize fleet vehicle routes such as garbage or recycling collection trucks. Google Earth could also be used for determining:
i) raw material and products availability as a function of location, and
ii) modes of transportation as a function of emissions. These overlays would enable manufacturers access to an easily navigable method to optimize the life cycle of their products by minimizing transportation embodied energy. The most efficient transportation methods and travel routes could be calculated. This could have an enormous impact on our toll on the environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

well done Google.
Posted by: danielleismyname on Feb 2, 2009 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a time when everyone seems to be focusing on the economy, the fact that we can use something huge like Google for the good of the planet is really refreshing. Its not all about profits, but its not all about tree-hugging either- it s a little of both. No doubt Google is amazing, and will surely profit off of this technology, as will Moore being that she works for them, but it is awesome to see that it can be put to such good use. That is something that can rarely be said for new technology. Usually its focus is on making us faster, cooler, more efficient, better connected to our friends, family, etc. But new technology that helps us help the planet? Way to go Google!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Google Earth and Beyond
Posted by: XenonofArcticus on Feb 3, 2009 3:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As cool as Google Earth is and all it can do for helping initiate great numbers of people into the wonders of our planet, it is foremost a tool for communication. You might say it is a tool for the Earth to communicate with people, no more perfect nor imperfect than photos, language or even first-hand experience. For those who doubt that first-hand experience of nature is imperfect, think of all the people that conclude that there is no global warming because they experienced a spell of cold weather this winter. Think of the people that have concluded that natural resources and open space are limitless because they've seen the empty spaces of Wyoming and Montana. Reality can be deceiving without broader perspective and that is where GE excels because it shows the big picture.

There are other tools available in this genre that you might be interested in if you want to communicate about the earth in general or specific parts of it. My small company has been making such software since the early '90s. It is now used by major agencies like the Forest Service and by conservation groups to help reach consensus about how land management can benefit both the public and ecological communities. It doesn't replace on-the-ground knowledge but it is an aide to communication and examination of alternate possibilities. And yes, you can tie into the big picture through our support of Google Earth. We think the big picture is important too! http://www.3dnature.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

TIMELY ARTICLE
Posted by: carolcsme on Feb 3, 2009 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for this article - I made the error of watching broadcast news the past several days, simply because it was there...and it really reinforced my appreciation for AlterNet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Google for Humanity!
Posted by: Mickey Allums on Feb 2, 2009 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thank E. B, Boyd for this story.
Google Earth has great potential for a common knowledge base, for global communities to share their concerns and visions.
Along with each student in schools across America being provided a computer, Google Earth should come bundled with it.
Mickey Allums, Killeen, Texas

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Next Map? How about one showing the graduation of projected sea level rise...
Posted by: gazooks on Feb 2, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and the catastrophic displacement of global population that results.

We don't have the option of dealing just with the mindlessness of environmental abuses on a local scale bad as they are.

Imagine what's in store when the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet slides;

Potential collapse of the WAIS (from Wikipedia)

Large parts of the WAIS sit on a reverse-sloping bed below sea level. The reverse slope, and the low isostatic head, means that the ice sheet is theoretically unstable: a small retreat could in theory destabilize the entire WAIS leading to rapid disintegration. Current computer models do not include the physics necessary to simulate this process, and observations do not provide guidance, so predictions as to its rate of retreat remain uncertain. This has been known for decades.

In January 2006, in a UK government-commissioned report, the head of the British Antarctic Survey, Chris Rapley, warned that this huge west Antarctic ice sheet may be starting to disintegrate, an event that could raise sea levels by at least 5 metres (16 ft). Estimates by others have ranged from 6 to 15 m (20–50 ft). Rapley said a previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report playing down worries about the ice sheet's stability should be revised.

"The last IPCC report characterized Antarctica as a slumbering giant in terms of climate change," he wrote. "I would say it is now an awakened giant. There is real concern." . Note that the IPCC report did not use the words "slumbering giant".

Rapley said, "Parts of the Antarctic ice sheet that rest on bedrock below sea level have begun to discharge ice fast enough to make a significant contribution to sea level rise. Understanding the reason for this change is urgent in order to be able to predict how much ice may ultimately be discharged and over what timescale. Current computer models do not include the effect of liquid water on ice sheet sliding and flow, and so provide only conservative estimates of future behaviour."

James Hansen, a senior NASA scientist who is a leading climate adviser to the US government, said the results were deeply worrying. "Once a sheet starts to disintegrate, it can reach a tipping point beyond which break-up is explosively rapid," he said.

A detailed map example posted on Google Earth under "Global Awareness" might just help further funding for intensified modeling and breadth of awareness of exactly where and what populations are affected.

To spur the programs so urgently needed to avert, if possible, an unprecedented tragedy of global scale would be no small contribution to humanity and the environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Housing development OKAY but logging BAD!
Posted by: bperkins on Feb 2, 2009 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with the overall idea of the piece. I find it illogical to suggest that logging is bad and housing development is okay. Don't housing developments in rural areas have negative environmental effects just as logging. At least trees grow back on logging sites where trees will never grow back in people's yard and under their new house.

I can't for the life of me understand how people don't make the connection between logging and their demand for houses. Especially new houses out in (formerly) rural areas. We should be concentrating our development in existing cities/towns. Stop new housing developments. Build with wood but build high rises. They build up to 8 stories tall in Europe with wood. Why does everyone in America want a single family house? Once we acknowledged that we can't ALL have a house in paradise because paradise will be lost, then we can starting thinking about how to develop solutions to our problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

How
Posted by: jeffr on Feb 2, 2009 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does someone get involved in something like this?

Anyone know?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Google Earth can also be use for solutions
Posted by: Cap'n Solar on Feb 2, 2009 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great article, which shows how Google Earth can be used to protect the environment. It can also be used actively to reduce impact from everyday activities. Already Google has instituted the ability to shorten routes, avoid traffic, and to map the automobile route that uses the least fuel. Even better is their work to encourage walking and the use of public transit in many cities.

Recent work has shown the same analysis for single destination trips could be used to optimize fleet vehicle routes such as garbage or recycling collection trucks. Google Earth could also be used for determining:
i) raw material and products availability as a function of location, and
ii) modes of transportation as a function of emissions. These overlays would enable manufacturers access to an easily navigable method to optimize the life cycle of their products by minimizing transportation embodied energy. The most efficient transportation methods and travel routes could be calculated. This could have an enormous impact on our toll on the environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

well done Google.
Posted by: danielleismyname on Feb 2, 2009 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a time when everyone seems to be focusing on the economy, the fact that we can use something huge like Google for the good of the planet is really refreshing. Its not all about profits, but its not all about tree-hugging either- it s a little of both. No doubt Google is amazing, and will surely profit off of this technology, as will Moore being that she works for them, but it is awesome to see that it can be put to such good use. That is something that can rarely be said for new technology. Usually its focus is on making us faster, cooler, more efficient, better connected to our friends, family, etc. But new technology that helps us help the planet? Way to go Google!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Google Earth and Beyond
Posted by: XenonofArcticus on Feb 3, 2009 3:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As cool as Google Earth is and all it can do for helping initiate great numbers of people into the wonders of our planet, it is foremost a tool for communication. You might say it is a tool for the Earth to communicate with people, no more perfect nor imperfect than photos, language or even first-hand experience. For those who doubt that first-hand experience of nature is imperfect, think of all the people that conclude that there is no global warming because they experienced a spell of cold weather this winter. Think of the people that have concluded that natural resources and open space are limitless because they've seen the empty spaces of Wyoming and Montana. Reality can be deceiving without broader perspective and that is where GE excels because it shows the big picture.

There are other tools available in this genre that you might be interested in if you want to communicate about the earth in general or specific parts of it. My small company has been making such software since the early '90s. It is now used by major agencies like the Forest Service and by conservation groups to help reach consensus about how land management can benefit both the public and ecological communities. It doesn't replace on-the-ground knowledge but it is an aide to communication and examination of alternate possibilities. And yes, you can tie into the big picture through our support of Google Earth. We think the big picture is important too! http://www.3dnature.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

TIMELY ARTICLE
Posted by: carolcsme on Feb 3, 2009 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for this article - I made the error of watching broadcast news the past several days, simply because it was there...and it really reinforced my appreciation for AlterNet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS