COMMENTS: 5
Lease Your Roof for the Solar Energy Revolution
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Solar power, always a popular subject but a tiny piece of America's energy puzzle, could be looking up -- literally -- as power drawn from America's roofs could provide juice without the carbon, trade balance and security concerns of fossil fuels and the huge upfront costs and land-use hassles of bigger solar projects.
Permitting delays for large photovoltaic projects (where sunlight hits silicon chips and creates electricity) are likely to disrupt an industry endeavoring to grow at 50 percent a year. Meanwhile, electricity from large solar thermal farms (in which sunlight heats water to turn electrical-generating turbines) need a vastly upgraded power grid to deliver the power they produce in remote areas to the nation's cities. A solar acreage land rush is now in full swing in the Southwest.
But there's a partial way around such regulatory and infrastructure bottlenecks. Rooftop solar installations -- putting photovoltaic systems on the roof of your workplace or even your home -- have few regulatory impediments and drip into the grid from a lot of points instead of gushing in from one massive operation.
Lots of small feeds could result in a big gain: In a 2005 study, Navigant Consulting estimated up to 710,000 megawatts of solar electricity generation capacity in the U.S. (or 75 percent of the nation's consumption) if every viable residential and commercial rooftop was utilized. (One megawatt is roughly the amount of juice needed for 1,000 U.S. homes.)
"This study shows that the available rooftop area can provide enough space to power a significant portion of U.S. electricity needs," Navigant's director Lisa Frantzis was quoted at the time. That's a best-case scenario, of course. In a 2008 report on market penetration of rooftop solar conducted for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Navigant estimated a more modest 2,000 to 4,000 megawatts by 2015. (It also predicts six times that if the right incentives -- like the Department of Energy's Solar America Initiative — were put in place.)
First Obstacle: It's Expensive
The cost of buying and installing solar cells are, however, a significant barrier to building owners investing in rooftop solar electricity. Still, new financing options are opening up, with solar power purchase agreements, or PPAs, solar leasing and solar financing districts increasing the options available to property owners.
Greentech Media forecast in early 2008 that PPAs -- "in which companies pay the upfront costs of solar-power projects in exchange for a contract requiring the customer to buy the resulting electricity" -- will drive 75 percent of commercial and industrial solar system sales by 2009, up from 10 percent in 2005. Residential solar lease financing is also beginning to gain traction in the United States.
In California and several other states, cities and counties can create energy finance districts for commercial and residential solar system purchases with loan payments made through 20-year property tax assessments.
Despite not renewing tax credits for renewable energy technology in the 2007 energy bill, tax credits and incentives are still an important component of solar photovoltaic economic viability in the U.S. and most other countries. Congress did pass the Expanded Federal Solar Investment Tax Credit in late 2008.
Some of its incentives for solar electric installations, including rooftop photovoltaic systems, include extending (for eight years) a 30 percent tax credit for residential and commercial solar systems, eliminating the $2,000 limit for residential solar electric installations, and authorizing $800 million for clean energy bonds.
How Much Am I Bid for This Shingled Beauty?
To accelerate solar energy investments, I have proposed creating an auction exchange market connecting solar integrators and building owners, which would be expected to drive market efficiencies and speed adoption of solar rooftop leasing.
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jarhead on Feb 3, 2009 2:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Feb 3, 2009 3:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great start.
Jarhead is correct in his previous comment, the stimulus would be best handled by the people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wjfaust on Feb 3, 2009 3:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the very least, you will get a response. If negative and not very thoughtful, carry the conversation to your local community through a good letter to the editor asking why your local utility isn't pursuing this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djnoll on Feb 3, 2009 5:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Clark County where the school board has a fund for renewable energy retro-fits, the Electrical Workers Union has refused to allow the non-profit to install any electrical equipment on county buildings or schools because the NPO is non-union. This allows them to keep the cost of installation down for their projects, so instead of $11/watt, it only costs $6/watt. The NPO has offered to train people in the union on these projects so that they can do this on other county buildings, but the union leaders have refused to allow their members to learn these new green skills.
While I support unions in some industries because of the abuses of employers, to deny schools this financial and energy resource because they do not like the rate a non-profit paying people is just stupid and ignorant. If they would allow their apprentices to work on these projects they could eventually re-train their workers so that as a new power grid is built, new energy generating facilities are built, and new installations are retro-fitted into existing buildings, they could keep their people working.
My husband is an electrician, and if he could get the training, he would work on solar and wind projects now. But he cannot afford the training, and so he remains unemployed as the industry goes down the toilet.
It is time for everyone to realize that we are in this mess together, and if we could get people to stop thinking about themselves first, and put our futures first (for ourselves and our children's benefits), we might actually get out of this disaster left by the Republicans with our economy revamped, our schools getting additional funding indefinitely, and our work force retrained.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Feb 8, 2009 8:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question is, PV panels or home heating and hot water preheating? Hot water pays pretty well.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jarhead on Feb 3, 2009 2:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Feb 3, 2009 3:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great start.
Jarhead is correct in his previous comment, the stimulus would be best handled by the people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wjfaust on Feb 3, 2009 3:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the very least, you will get a response. If negative and not very thoughtful, carry the conversation to your local community through a good letter to the editor asking why your local utility isn't pursuing this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djnoll on Feb 3, 2009 5:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Clark County where the school board has a fund for renewable energy retro-fits, the Electrical Workers Union has refused to allow the non-profit to install any electrical equipment on county buildings or schools because the NPO is non-union. This allows them to keep the cost of installation down for their projects, so instead of $11/watt, it only costs $6/watt. The NPO has offered to train people in the union on these projects so that they can do this on other county buildings, but the union leaders have refused to allow their members to learn these new green skills.
While I support unions in some industries because of the abuses of employers, to deny schools this financial and energy resource because they do not like the rate a non-profit paying people is just stupid and ignorant. If they would allow their apprentices to work on these projects they could eventually re-train their workers so that as a new power grid is built, new energy generating facilities are built, and new installations are retro-fitted into existing buildings, they could keep their people working.
My husband is an electrician, and if he could get the training, he would work on solar and wind projects now. But he cannot afford the training, and so he remains unemployed as the industry goes down the toilet.
It is time for everyone to realize that we are in this mess together, and if we could get people to stop thinking about themselves first, and put our futures first (for ourselves and our children's benefits), we might actually get out of this disaster left by the Republicans with our economy revamped, our schools getting additional funding indefinitely, and our work force retrained.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Feb 8, 2009 8:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question is, PV panels or home heating and hot water preheating? Hot water pays pretty well.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




