COMMENTS: 552
Chemtrails in the Sky Are Evidence of Nefarious Activities for Broad-Based Conspiracy Theorists
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.
Anyone living near a major metropolitan airport has gazed up at the sky and seen them: patchworks of crisscrossing contrails left by passing jetliners. Most of us don't give a second thought to this common sight of a scratched-up sky. If we do, it's likely to reflect on the explosion in air traffic and its growing contribution to air pollution.
But for an expanding minority of Americans, those hanging contrails represent something much more sinister than increased carbon emissions. Since the late 1990s, a flourishing conspiracy theory subculture has been ringing the alarm that many of these contrails aren't normal vapor-and-exhaust contrails at all. Rather, they are chemtrails, mysterious and menacing chemical evidence of secret government programs to modify the weather and depopulate the planet.
Investigation into, and speculation over, the nature of these chemtrails has grown over the last decade from a marginal belief into a millions-strong Transatlantic Truth Quest, with chemtrails taking on the stature of celestial UFOs. If first-wave UFO sightings were the projection of early Cold War fears, chemtrails are the climate-change-age corollary, with cultural panic over pollution and changing weather patterns projected onto the clouds and planes in the sky.
As with flying saucers, hundreds of YouTube clips purport to capture cities "getting pasted" by secret government planes. Dozens of chemtrails Web sites compete for the loyalty and business of a sprawling, gullible and increasingly global chemtrails flock. Like the white lines that are its obsession, the chemtrails scene crisscrosses with every other strand in the pantheon of cosmic conspiracy culture. Most chemtrails sites, like the lovable dontchemtrailmebro.com, also peddle in 9/11 Truth, alien contact, Northern Idaho survivalism and the "suppressed" theories of the twin martyred wizards of etheric energy, Wilhelm Reich and Nicolai Tesla.
The chemtrails scene is a loud saloon of shouting New Age conspiracists spouting conflicting theories at the bar, with the usual assortment of hucksters and Internet paranoids filling the tables. The self-styled leaders of the movement are a diverse lot but share a consensus starting point that thousands of jets are spraying millions of gallons of "chemtrail soup" around the world on a daily basis.
Chemtrails, they hold, are easily distinguished from normal contrails by their longer duration and expansive dissipation patterns. Most of the spraying is believed to take place at night over the population centers of NATO countries, although some skywatchers suspect Russia and China are being targeted as well. As for the content of the soup and who is responsible for the program, that's where things get contentious. But the major theories are generally some variation or combination of the following:
1) U.S. oil companies are secretly spraying reflective chemicals in the air to reduce global warming and thus reduce criticism of fossil fuels.
2) A New World Order cabal -- also known as the Illuminati -- is spraying cities with pathogens in the first of a two-stage depopulation program.
3) NATO aircraft are involved in a top-secret weather-modification program, and/or are refining a new-generation of high-frequency atmospheric weapons.
4) The U.S. government is using commercial and military aircraft to assist and monitor weather events like hurricanes and tornadoes in order to both destroy enemies and pump money into the domestic economy through emergency spending/recovery bills.
Scott Stevens is a leading proponent of the fourth theory. A former TV meteorologist in Pocatello, Idaho, Stevens was fired when he began giving national radio interviews on chemtrails. He took his severance and moved to the foothills above Denver International Airport, where he now conducts plain-sight research into chemtrails full time, maintains the chemtrails site weatherwarsinfo.blogspot.com, and hosts "Amerika Now," a local AM-radio conspiracy culture talk show.
"I don't buy the theory that chemtrails are a pathogenic depopulation program," says Stevens. "You don't need to get so high in the atmosphere for that. And you don't need airplanes."
Stay up to date with the latest Environment headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cindyn on Jan 27, 2009 12:21 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And we are no more outlandish than O'Reilly imitators who think they'll ever get more votes than
Posted by: Beck
» (con't)Well, I wasn't sure, but speculated he was not going to be much different....
Posted by: Prophit
» At least Obama is REAL, and has a real chance to change things.
Posted by: Elendil
» Here is what is NOT supposed to keep happening to Democrats
Posted by: Beck
» Look who Obama is surrounding himself with: people who help to oppress all Americans
Posted by: bbruhwiler8
» RE: Look who Obama is surrounding himself with: people who help to oppress all Americans
Posted by: bbruhwiler8
» RE: Look who Obama is surrounding himself with: people who help to oppress all Americans
Posted by: EncinoM
» A parable
Posted by: pelican beak
» Weather control
Posted by: SolarSiStar
» "CHEMTRAILS" is a fake conspiracy theory promulgated to discredit real issues like 9/11 truth
Posted by: realtruther
» No, 9/11 truthiness is a fake conspiracy promulgated to...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: No, 9/11 truthiness is a fake conspiracy promulgated to...
Posted by: EncinoM
» YES, 9/11 LIARS are bogus CLODS that worship the Status Quo
Posted by: PointMan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Obijuan on Jan 27, 2009 12:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely the author doesn't believe the official 9/11 report? Oh wait, you do.
I am disappointed in Alternet for posting this article here. It's propoganda.
obi
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And with one wipe...Agreed.
Posted by: chuckjs
» I don't know, it seems that everytime we have a "conspiracy theory"... it turns out...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: CosmoViking
» So the German Army is spiking the fuel of.....
Posted by: chuckjs
» No, its the US who is doing it here... I didn't see that guy say the Germans are doing it here.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: pfraterdeus
» Gee, this sounds familiar when way back we "CONSPIRACY NUTS" warned about the ....
Posted by: Prophit
» I think I know why this article was published NOW....
Posted by: Prophit
» Yeah, you're seriously rural, all right . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Yeah, you're seriously rural, all right . . .
Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: Yeah, you're seriously rural, all right . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» suggestion - a tinfoil hat might protect your poor brain
Posted by: Auk
» RE: I think I know why this article was published NOW....
Posted by: madashell8683
» RE: I think I know why this article was published NOW....
Posted by: madashell8683
» RE: I think I know why this article was published NOW....
Posted by: zepher
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: crazy carlos
» Alternet IS the enemy.
Posted by: pfgetty
» Alternet not the enemy . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Alternet not the enemy . . .
Posted by: pfgetty
» Alternet doesn't peddle vapid conspiracy theories...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Yes, they do, they did the official conspiracy theory that is laughable about 9-11.
Posted by: EncinoM
» Your joking right??? LOL
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Your joking right??? LOL
Posted by: liz_imp
» Well, to understand the money part of it, you have to understand....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Well, to understand the money part of it, you have to understand....
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Your joking right??? LOL
Posted by: EncinoM
» A racist response
Posted by: brunowe
» it wasn't because they were arabs, it was because they operated out of....
Posted by: Prophit
» Wrong again
Posted by: brunowe
» It was planned in Germany . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Yes, they do, they did the official conspiracy theory that is laughable about 9-11.
Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: Alternet doesn't peddle vapid conspiracy theories...
Posted by: pfgetty
» 9/11 truthiness is about piles and piles of something...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: 9/11 truthiness is about piles and piles of something...
Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: 9/11 truthiness is about piles and piles of something...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: 9/11 truthiness is about piles and piles of something...
Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: 9/11 truthiness is about piles and piles of something...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: 9/11 truthiness is about piles and piles of something...
Posted by: pfgetty
» It isn't BS
Posted by: brunowe
» BS bruneye projects yet more BS for Police State Crime
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: It isn't BS
Posted by: pfgetty
» A "Pearl Harbor" incident?
Posted by: John Sawyer
» RE: A "Pearl Harbor" incident?
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: A "Pearl Harbor" incident?
Posted by: John Sawyer
» AlterNet is a left-wing gatekeeper
Posted by: kellysgarden
» Ah, the old "they must be in on it"
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Ah, the old "they must be in on it"
Posted by: kellysgarden
» Wow, what insight... that is very true... they must be trying...
Posted by: Prophit
» Except that you're the usual troll
Posted by: brunowe
» Excellent, Kellys Garden, you just did me a big favor....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: AlterNet is a left-wing gatekeeper
Posted by: pfgetty
» They are financed by those who would prefer the 9-11 story remain under the cover...
Posted by: Prophit
» Ah yes, follow the money to who is behind
Posted by: kellysgarden
» follow the money
Posted by: kellysgarden
» See? Alternet just did me a favor.... I did not know about this group...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: They are financed by those who would prefer the 9-11 story remain under the cover...
Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: They are financed by those who would prefer the 9-11 story remain under the cover...
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: They are financed by those who would prefer the 9-11 story remain under the cover...
Posted by: pfgetty
» But who owns AlterNet?
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: They are financed by those who would prefer the 9-11 story remain under the cover...
Posted by: Shey
» RE: AlterNet is a left-wing gatekeeper
Posted by: John Sawyer
» RE: AlterNet is a left-wing gatekeeper
Posted by: pfgetty
» "after you learn who the trolls are and how to detect them"??
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: "after you learn who the trolls are and how to detect them"??
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: "after you learn who the trolls are and how to detect them"??
Posted by: EncinoM
» First of all they come on at around the same time, and its usually....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: "after you learn who the trolls are and how to detect them"??
Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: jpom22
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: praedor
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: Shey
» RE: And with one wipe...
Posted by: bcain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bbruhwiler8 on Jan 27, 2009 12:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Growing up in the '70s I remember seeing contrails everyday as jets flew over my home. What are contrails? As a jet flies, moisture is released from the jet engines. If the jet is high enough in the sky (a high altitude) where the humidity (moisture in the air) is low (very little moisture), then the moisture released from the engines of the jet immediately forms ice crystals because of the speed of the jet through the cool air. That is the trail that forms behind the jet.
Contrails never last more than a few seconds because water is a heat conductor, so it absorbs the heat of all the air around it, and the heat of the sun. That's why when you see a contrail behind a jet, it disappears as quickly as it appears, and the trail stays the same length the entire time as the jet flies overhead.
You will never see a contrail appear among clouds because clouds form at lower altitudes of high humidity. Clouds are a direct result of high humidity. Contrails form in low humidity, and dissipate just as quickly.
If the trail behind the jet is thick and/or the trail persists even as the jet has flown out of sight, then what you see is not a contrail. It is not water vapor, but rather must consist of some other particulates. Most people call them 'chemtrails', chem being short for chemical. I call them spray trails.
In Los Angeles, one day you will see a beautiful clear blue sky, and the next day you will see a massive display of spray trails. As you watch, the trails spread and form variations of clouds that resemble cirrus clouds. I've watched jets spraying trails until the sky is completely covered horizon to horizon, even over the ocean, as far as I can see. What's funny is that when I see a small clearing in the spray, where I can see the sky, lo and behold, a jet comes through and sprays a new thick line through that clearing.
My suggestion to everyone is that you watch the sky every chance you get until you can judge easily for yourself. They seem to spray less during the Summer, so start watching now. You will notice all kinds of patterns like multiple parallel lines, tic tac toe, DNA (two jets flying parallel, one a slight distance behind the other, and they criss cross each other's path again and again!) and more. On more than one occasion I've even seem them spray a circle!
If you find a website that tells you contrails can last several minutes and even hours, then you know that you can not trust that website. They are spewing false science in an attempt to steer you away from concerning yourself with what they are doing in secret, right in front of you, in the sky.
I suggest you do more research to discover what particulates they are spraying. I can assure you that whatever it is, it's not good for us. Otherwise, why would they keep it a secret? After WWII, England admitted to spraying the population with all kinds of elements as experiments. In the '50s, the CIA used car exhaust, and subway ventilation systems to spray elements in NYC as experiments.
Watch the sky.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Engineer here.
Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: ngineer here.
Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: ngineer here.
Posted by: uncleeddie
» RE: Engineer here.
Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» Quacks on Ego
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: ngineer here.
Posted by: helenwheels
» Spending most of your time staring at the sky will.......
Posted by: chuckjs
» i advise those of you doing the sky-staring
Posted by: aislinnluv
» Advice?
Posted by: bornxeyed
» conversely
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: i advise those of you doing the sky-staring
Posted by: Shey
» You are absolutely right as I had to do research for our local health....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: You are absolutely right as I had to do research for our local health....
Posted by: helenwheels
» EncinoMuck rears his Ugly BS
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: ncinoMuck rears his Ugly BS
Posted by: EncinoM
» EncinoMuck rears his Ugly BS
Posted by: PointMan
» You just listed two variables/factors that the FAA Manager's family...
Posted by: Prophit
» HC (hydrocarbons) + O2 = H2O + CO2
Posted by: gellero1
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: nha16
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: praedor
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: John Sawyer
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: peskyfly1
» RE: Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kwalla on Jan 27, 2009 1:12 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is a conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids!!!
Posted by: Sparks56
» Actually
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Actually
Posted by: Shey
» i urge to heed the advice of brig. gen. jack d. ripper
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: i urge to heed the advice of brig. gen. jack d. ripper
Posted by: kwalla
» Agreed...But it's not a 'conspiracy'
Posted by: gellero1
» Well, if the military is that incompetent than we should be even more....
Posted by: Prophit
» There was no stand-down order
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: There was no stand-down order
Posted by: Feltixx
» Cheney refused to change his "stand down" order for the war games....
Posted by: Prophit
» jokes aside:it's more pollution:Jan.23,Fri.was an official bad air day
Posted by: NYCartist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jan 27, 2009 1:14 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You should take a course in meteorology and learn about your planet's atmosphere and stop peddling this nonesense. Chemtrails indeed...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong... AMEN!
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: nha16
» Wow.
Posted by: nha16
» We did see these 30 years ago...
Posted by: Praktik
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: Praktik
» This is the best user comment in YEARS!
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: graemebacque
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: uncleeddie
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: bcain
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: ChrisSkiman
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...military husband just gave me a briefing on contrails
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aouie01 on Jan 27, 2009 1:19 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sincerely,
Aouie
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: bcain
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: uncleeddie
» RE: No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: bcgirl125
Comments are closed-
Posted by: profmarcus on Jan 27, 2009 1:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And, yes, I DO take it personally
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED!
Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED!
Posted by: John Sawyer
» Small Box
Posted by: Sparks56
» Well, your not alone... here is a legit publication in Idaho...
Posted by: Prophit
» This "legit" Idaho periodical...
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: This "legit" Idaho periodical...
Posted by: EncinoM
» No research necessary. Survivalists go to Idaho because it's "behind" the missile fields
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: No research necessary. Survivalists go to Idaho because it's "behind" the missile fields
Posted by: Smackback
» RE: No research necessary. Survivalists go to Idaho because it's "behind" the missile fields
Posted by: brunowe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Anthhh on Jan 27, 2009 2:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
~~~Look at(listen to) the TV for one.
Where o where was the vigilant persons looking when the War Criminals were growing under our noses? when they successfully sat and plotted a massive attack on us ? The False Flag 9-11 Imperialist Plot ! Financial and political profiteers are STILL PLOTTING THESE THINGS!
WHO cares about another silly poison? There are SLEWS of them. NO DOUBT. OUR TAP WATER CONTAINS HIGH LEVELS OF QUICKLIME. DO you know that is there to reduce acidity of the water and reduce corrosion of the piping system. Keeping pipe costs low. This quicklime isnt very good for the acid balance of our stomachs, destroying our digestion capacity.
If they was going to poison us, we would have ZERO knoweldge and ZERO power to do anything. This talk gets us nowhere. Demand investigations.
We CAN choose to say the right things, and to ask the right questions to the right people. in the right manner.
... and change the fact of WHY does this shoe of abuse seem to fit? And we move forward from that standpoint (no puns intended)
Having that shoe of abused power fitting them is something we CAN do something about. To be vigilant and give discredit where discredit is due.
What outed mugger will attempt a mugging while being watched ? Instead he will be busy trying to achieve an "innocent" name for himself.
*hrmmmobamainstallationhrmmm*
By the way THERE ANOTHER 9-11 FALSE FLAG ATTACK planned for this year.
I believe that if enough people start talk about it, BEFORE it happens, it can be prevented.
Re:Analyses of Gaza attack aim Dear Representative of the website,
I wish to share another analyses of the attack upon the civilization of Gaza. I fear that the attack was deliberately made to be such a horrendous act. SO horrendous that it will be understandable for someone to be provoked to a violent revenge even upon the US innocent civilians . The world would easily believe the revenge was a true reveng and not a "False Flag" by a Imperialist plot for placing blame upon Middle Eastern Islamic militants. I fear that the US administration is planning to attack its own citizens again and place the blame upon t e r r o r i s m again, in another false flag operation. Also this is a high probability in veiw of the complete stage which is set. With a (false) "Good-Guy" President, US again becomes an "innocent" victim of the "barbaric" act. Then this "innocent" president expects and commands respect and following of the whole world as it proceeds to finish the genocides of The Islamic Middle Eastern civilizations as well as their benefactors This Barbaric t e r r o r i s m will allow the Occupations to escalate a hundredfold without any complaints. I believe that if enough people talk it may be prevented.
The president of Iran warned the president of Iraq of enemy plots and conspiracies against them on thursday. To be vigilant and give discredit where discredit is due
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» ..I AM A STREET PROTESTER
Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: ..I AM A STREET PROTESTER [The conspiracy is not to deliberately poison people (customers),
Posted by: Squarehead
» Actually, your quite right on your take about false flags and getting it out before....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: ....OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED
Posted by: EncinoM
» ...its not a game of king of the hill
Posted by: Anthhh
» You said that last year
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: You said that last year
Posted by: Shey
» RE: ....OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED
Posted by: Noor
» RE: ....OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED
Posted by: Shey
» RE: ....OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whiteaglesoaring on Jan 27, 2009 3:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'll have to refine your use of emotional garbage so it isn't so laughable.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahahaha, I love good sarcasm.....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 27, 2009 3:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The inability to agree on the story is a defining feature of a delusional belief system. People with alternate theories, such as chemtrails, tend to disagree radically with one another.
I'm not a political scientist or a sociologist, but there seems to be an obvious pattern here.
For example, right-wingers say man-made global warming is a hoax...but they disagree completely on what's really going on. Some say the globe is warming, but that it's not manmade. Others say it's cooling. Each global warming denier has his/her own crackpot explanation for what is going on. The only thing they agree on is that the scientists are wrong.
Ditto with the 9/11 Truth Movement, which holds that 9/11 was an "inside job." The Truthers say the government story is wrong...but then the agreement ends. In fact, virtually every 9/11 Truther in the world has a different theory--a fact you can verify by looking at a few Truther sites. They disagree on every aspect of the theory--from who did it to how they did it to why they did it. The only thing they agree on is that, somehow, the real experts are wrong.
You see what I mean. Delusional people can't achieve any kind of consensus on their beliefs. They reject the theories of qualified experts and go off and make up their own theories.
Sure enough, chemtrail believers have countless conflicting theories about what is being sprayed, by whom, and for what purpose. They fight with one another, attack one another, and call each other government agents constantly. It's really very funny.
PS: A foolish and silly clip by me, called World of Ick.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Inability to agree on the story--sure sign of a delusional belief system
Posted by: mkdelta69
» New Yorker are never 9/11 "truthers"
Posted by: Auk
» RE: New Yorker are never 9/11 "truthers"
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: New Yorkers are never 9/11 "truthers"
Posted by: Auk
» RE: New Yorkers are never 9/11 "truthers"
Posted by: EncinoM
» Speak for yourself, Kool-Aid
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: Speak for yourself, Kool-Aid
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Speak for yourself, Kool-Aid
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Speak for yourself, Kool-Aid
Posted by: EncinoM
» Wrong Again EncinoMuck
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck
Posted by: PointMan
» First of all, if you worked in the twin towers, than you know....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: First of all, if you worked in the twin towers, than you know....
Posted by: EncinoM
» nope, see how you lie...
Posted by: realtruther
» RE: nope, see how you lie...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Did you ever think it was because the so called "truthers" don't have ....
Posted by: Prophit
» Delusional people don't understand the laws of physics
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Heck, you forgot the obvious which didn't even require physics.....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Heck, you forgot the obvious which didn't even require physics.....
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Inability of Christians to agree on the story--sure sign of a delusional belief system
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Hahahaha, now that was funny.......
Posted by: Prophit
» By Perry Logan's Standard GW Bush, Stalin & Hitler were all Heroes
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Squarehead on Jan 27, 2009 3:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Weather? Temperature? Ice crystal formation? Illuminati? New World Order? Population cull?
You guys know it all.
Or maybe not. Dear Oh Dear.
There is a long history, in USA, of deluded theories of how the planet is run.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Jan 27, 2009 4:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How convenient to have invented the term "conspiracy theorists" to dismiss serious questions! But it's only a label, not an answer to anything.
There's an interesting chapter on contrails in The Cloudspotters Guide by Gavin Pretor-Pinney. The science is separate, however, from being concerned about and investigating the misuse of power by those who call the shots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Praktik on Jan 27, 2009 4:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To all those who subscribe to "chemtrail theory" - all I can say is, test yourself!
Is your belief based on emotion, on what you would _like_ to believe? Or is it based on fact?
Look down the left of the link for different topics so you can learn about contrail formation and the myriad of ways they manifest. If you see a contrail going "on" and "off" - it isn't proof of a "chemtrail" button being pushed on and off, its due to the nature of the atmosphere:
"But it’s actually very simply. The amount of water in the exhaust is pretty constant, but the amount of moisture in the air is not. The humidity varies with altitude, and a layer of low humidity can be sandwiched between two layers of high humidity. As a plane climbs or descends through this layer, then the trail will only form in the areas of high humidity, and so look like it was “switched off” in the area of low humidity.
You can get the same effect with temperature. A warm layer of air can actually lay on top of a colder layer in what is called an “inversion” (you’ll hear this on the weather sometimes, referred to as an “inversion layer”). When a plane flies through this inversion layer, the trail can be “broken”.
It’s not just climbing or descending flights either. The boundaries between these layers is not flat, and gravity waves or rising convection currents of air can create large volume of air that differ in temperature and/or humidity from the neighboring air, and so can break (or make) the contrail when then plane flies through them.
Don’t take my word for it though. Do a Google search for “broken contrail” and you’ll find lots of examples, and similar explanations (Click the photos above for two)."
http://contrailscience.com/broken-contrails/
Don't let yourself be fooled - learn!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Except that real contrails evaporate quickly but chemtrails do not
Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: xcept that real contrails evaporate quickly but chemtrails do not
Posted by: Praktik
» RE: xcept that real contrails evaporate quickly but chemtrails do not
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: xcept that real contrails evaporate quickly but chemtrails do not
Posted by: Feltixx
» Its called "cognitive dissonance" and its a problem with many...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Its called "cognitive dissonance" and its a problem with many...
Posted by: Praktik
» Aaah, sounds like the looking glass theory to me...... we see others as we are!
Posted by: Prophit
» CON'T- Aaah, sounds like the looking glass theory to me...... we see others as we are!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: CON'T- Aaah, sounds like the looking glass theory to me...... we see others as we are!
Posted by: Praktik
» Oh, I am sorry, your right, how stupid of me, of course they would....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Oh, I am sorry, your right, how stupid of me, of course they would....
Posted by: Praktik
» Go read the sites like I did and discover WHAT CHEMICALS they are dumping on us.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Go read the sites like I did and discover WHAT CHEMICALS they are dumping on us.
Posted by: Praktik
» I take it then you didn't do as I suggested and read those sites...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: xcept that real contrails evaporate quickly; not according to my in-house expert
Posted by: Beck
» actually, go read my various posts, most of them have links...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: actually, go read my various posts, most of them have links...
Posted by: Praktik
» I will, as soon as you read my links and do the same thing.
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ad.johnson on Jan 27, 2009 4:53 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As ever, there is a confusion between "theory" and "evidence".
Some good points are covered in the article, but these days I usually skip to the conclusion of the article, which in this case is woefully inadequate because of its dismissal of all the evidence.
Those who are parroting "contrails... contrails... contrails... CONTRAILS for heaven's sake" have not looked at all the evidence:
Grids
Triangles
Time lapse studies
This evidence is clear and unequivocal - as is the path of Hurricane Erin and its location on 9/11/01 (which I encouraged the author of this article to study, but I am not sure from this article if he did).
Here:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
For my report about chemtrails, and some of the responses I received about it:
http://tinyurl.com/chemrep
For a short film I made for BBCi:
http://tinyurl.com/bbcichems
So "contrail fantasists", what say you? It's funny how some people comfort themselves that it's just a contrail only phenomenon. It really is funny. I am sure they feel comforted with the author's conclusion too.
A reminder: just because the purpose of something cannot be clearly defined does not mean it does not exist.
Example: Fred says: "I don't know what human beings are for!!". Bill says: "Neither do I - so they can't exist, can they?"
PLEASE distinguish properly between "theory" "evidence" and "proof". Thanks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Man_vs_Kleptocracy on Jan 27, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody that has bothered to look up now and then could never confuse the blanket, systematic crop dusting of the skies with "contrails" or any such ridiculous thing.
But not at the world according to this site. No sir. At Alternet 9/11 is just what the government says it is and so is the (mass thievery) Wall Street Bailouts along with that old "war on terror" thing.
No conspiracies here. It's just bloody business as usual.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What is even more disturbing is Alternets impact on the ....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: What is even more disturbing is Alternets impact on the ....
Posted by: Feltixx
» You know, I wish that were true.... but this site is considered...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: You know, I wish that were true.... but this site is considered...
Posted by: Feltixx
» No, actually I don't but if the posting on here is just a fraction, like most sites, of the hits...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero1 on Jan 27, 2009 5:43 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Military jets during training are in MOA's........outside they are controlled by ATC.
Anyone can go to a local airport and purchase airmaps that define federal airways.
Radar blips don't happen in IFR airspace without ATC seeing it.
Are air traffic controllers part of the 'conspiracy' too??
Knowledge and logic rule.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» interesting....but
Posted by: gellero1
» Ok, lets talk about the big picture ok???
Posted by: Prophit
» Neither does it prove that guy ever worked for the FAA.
Posted by: Scientz
» For example, Google the name . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Hahaha, you are sooo very right....... so read what this FAA guy has to say...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Right, it was a reporter, if you read well, you would know that... for a local radio station in ....
Posted by: Prophit
» You're insane.
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: You're insane.
Posted by: season
» RE: You're insane.
Posted by: EncinoM
» Fine, SHE'S insane.
Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Fine, SHE'S insane.
Posted by: Shey
» profit may be one the few "sane" people left on this site.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: IFR flightplans...AIRSPACE is always monitored
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: graemebacque on Jan 27, 2009 5:46 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be a requirement for environmental activists to do some studying of basic meteorology. This would go a long way toward dispelling this 'chemtrails' business and other 21st-century superstitions that literally cloud the very real and pressing issue of climate change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Finally some sanity!
Posted by: mike1997
» Yes, and the contrails evaporate quickly!
Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: Yes, and the contrails evaporate quickly!
Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: Yes, and the contrails evaporate quickly!
Posted by: EncinoM
» So, Mr Wannabe Meteorologist, why _don't_ chemtrails evaporate???
Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: So, Mr Wannabe Meteorologist, why _don't_ chemtrails evaporate???
Posted by: Feltixx
» baloney
Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: baloney
Posted by: Praktik
» Not one that lasts for hours
Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: Not one that lasts for hours
Posted by: Praktik
» RE: Not one that lasts for hours
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» nice contribution HANGTRAITORS
Posted by: Praktik
» RE: factual conspiartors involved in treason
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: factual conspiartors involved in treason
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: factual conspiartors involved in treason
Posted by: Shey
» RE: So, Mr Wannabe Meteorologist, why _don't_ chemtrails evaporate???
Posted by: graemebacque
» RE: Finally some sanity!
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mike1997 on Jan 27, 2009 5:56 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, was their response criminally stupid? Oh sure, everyone knows that!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I have a simple response to this one....... its a quote from FDR on that issue.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I have a simple response to this one....... its a quote from FDR on that issue.
Posted by: Shey
» no joke
Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: no joke
Posted by: Shey
» Anectdotal evidence dismissable
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Ah, but this will be ignored by those coming here to disrupt...
Posted by: Prophit
» incontrovertible huh...
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: katz22br on Jan 27, 2009 6:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that people sometimes come up with outlandish theories and beliefs for apparently mundane things, but this is NOT the case with the contrail/chemtrail suspicions. Those suspicions, unfortunately, are NOT completely unfounded.
The article doesnt mention it at all, but secret spraying tests over populated areas were actually done in many locations, inside and out of the United States. For decades. With real people, who were unaware of whatever was taking place. Real people who died or got sick because of those tests.
Please, don't take my words or those of any "conspiracy theorist nutjob" for it. Take the words of, say, an U.S. Senator. Here's a link:
billnelson.senate.gov/news/details.cfm?id=244626&
And here's an excerpt of what you'll see there:
"The land-based tests were done in five states -- including one near Yeehaw Junction, where a wheat fungus was sprayed -- and in the waters off Hawaii and California, as well as the United Kingdom and Canada. The purpose of the tests, which ran from 1962 to 1973, was to gauge the military's ability to cope with a biological or chemical attack.
Defense Department officials think most of the military personnel and civilians who might have been exposed were hit with only simulated versions of dangerous agents, or bacteria considered harmless to humans.
But outraged senators decried the decades-long policy of secrecy about the tests, and ordered the military to speed up the process of releasing information about Project 112 and any other similar programs."
(Bolds are mine.)
Interesting, huh? Wanna know more? Well, just some info about one out of many biowarfare programs is now declassified, but it certainly shows those tests were very real. Just Google for stuff like "Florida globigii spray", "Shady Grove", "Project SHAD", "tularensis marcescens spray tests", and so on.
There's a couple more links below. Some are official (Gov, Academia), some are not - but they are hardly the kind of material to be dismissed as "conspiracy theory" stuff:
fhp.osd.mil/CBexposures/pdfs/shady_grove_revised.pdf
books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11900&page=10
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5593/513a
(subscription needed)
coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue46/articles /history_of_biowarfare_in_usa.htm
(remove the space after "articles")
www.mindfully.org/Reform/Military-Germs-US-Cities.htm
So... now that we know for a fact that spraying tests over populated areas were really done by the government in the recent past, isn't it only logical to be at least suspicious of things that may look similar to that?
Careful with that cloud, Kronk!
k
p.s. for those who think "they" would never do that to their own country/voters: there is no dastardly deed that is too low for those seeking absolute power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 27, 2009 6:13 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well applied to the chemtrail crowd, the fluoride crowd, the GM crop crazies, and all the rest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Just keep drinking that government kool-aid
Posted by: thornwolf
» IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: NATIONAL SECURITY IS THE BLACK BOX
Posted by: EncinoM
» Well, here is the patented machine they use for chemtrail distribution...
Posted by: Prophit
» Nothing personal, Encino, but I have done a lot of work on this issue over the years....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Nothing personal, Encino, but I have done a lot of work on this issue over the years....
Posted by: sunnywater
» RE: Nothing personal, Encino, but I have done a lot of work on this issue over the years....
Posted by: Feltixx
» What she was responding to was not information that requires ....
Posted by: Prophit
» I am, notice I never call him names back again??? If he does not ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thornwolf on Jan 27, 2009 6:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have my own theory. Contrails evaporate quickly because they are primarily composed of water vapor. Chemtrails do not evaporate quickly because they are primarily composed of something other than water vapor.
So what are they, really?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I have provided links to gov sites that actually explains what they....
Posted by: Prophit
» Just to follow up, it just happened..... its so funny to watch the ...
Posted by: Prophit
» I provided that evidence - did you see it?
Posted by: Praktik
» RE: I provided that evidence - did you see it?
Posted by: Feltixx
» hmmm.. does "cognitive dissonance" apply here?
Posted by: Praktik
» Again, here's what my in-house expert says
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gnaw_bone on Jan 27, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Do you even understand how rediculous this comment sounds....
Posted by: Prophit
» How can we trust that proper "research" has been done . . .
Posted by: Scientz
» YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!!!
Posted by: kwalla
» RE: YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!!!
Posted by: mark_proulx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 6:31 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GO TO YOU TUBE ...AGENDA 21
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 96 chemtrails yesterday in my town
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: 96 chemtrails yesterday in my town
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: 96 chemtrails yesterday in my town
Posted by: EncinoM
» You know what's next: they accuse you of liking Bush!
Posted by: Auk
» RE: You know what's next: they accuse you of liking Bush!
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
» Well, you should be thanking them... they are the same ones...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marykmusic on Jan 27, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So do something about it!
Posted by: marykmusic
» RE: So do something about it!
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: So why not share on here..... besides we have no idea how to contact you...
Posted by: marykmusic
» Oh, thanks, I am sorry, I wasn't sure if it was a joke or for real...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: be marc on Jan 27, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we're to believe jet engines pollute far, far more today than they did twenty years ago? That the huge, miles-long hanging "contrails" those of us who live in rural areas observe crisscrossing the sky, on and way off the regular flight paths, are "normal" jet exhaust?
Nonsense.
Contrails are water vapor and dissipate quickly. They are not and never have been jetexhaust. The trails "conspiracy theorists" are referring to hang in the sky for a long, long time, resulting in a clear blue sky hazing over with "clouds", or something that looks like clouds.
Unlike the author, I don't claim to know what's going on. However, I do know the difference between contrails and chemtrails, and that chemtrails are not normal jet exhaust. Jet engines do not belch HUGE plumes of exhaust. This is clearly fiction. That these jets are belching huge plumes of something is observable fact.
This article is pure propaganda. Don't waste your time.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 6:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You know, I am beginning to think like you and I never did before.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: You know, I am beginning to think like you and I never did before.
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: You know, I am beginning to think like you and I never did before.
Posted by: EncinoM
» I noticed that too, you would think they would at least change their names... LOL
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I noticed that too, you would think they would at least change their names... LOL
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bjandresen on Jan 27, 2009 6:54 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» How ironic, NM was one of the first states to collect samples and have them tested.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Hmmm!
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redbridge on Jan 27, 2009 6:58 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are able to swallow the 9/11 Commission's report, you have no business writing in the progressive media. As a subscriber, I'm really disappointed to see Alternet once again label all of us with questions about 9/11 as 'conspiracy fanatics'.
How long until Joshua pegs those of us concerned that TARP is a waste of money as conspiracy fanatics?
If you're going to group different issues together in order to insult larger groups of your audience at one time, please send back my twenty. I haven't taken a stance on chemtrails, but your position certainly piques my curiosity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Greg Palast throws up in his mouth ...
Posted by: redbridge
» RE: Greg Palast throws up in his mouth ...
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Greg Palast throws up in his mouth ...
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Greg Palast throws up in his mouth ...
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Greg Palast throws up in his mouth ...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Damn, good for you girl..... you go..... its time we stopped being....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RickW on Jan 27, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A simple question
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: A simple question
Posted by: marykmusic
» RE: A simple question
Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: A simple question
Posted by: RickW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Jan 27, 2009 7:27 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(Someone call an EMT, because Southwest Airlines is choking on a little bag of pretzels as I write this!)
We know that long-lasting contrails on humid days reflect sunlight back into space, but that short-lasting contrails on dry days disappear into water vapor, which acts as a greenhouse gas. So the airlines are real polar bear killers!
The strong greenhouse effect solution would be for airlines to not fly in the upper atmosphere on dry days. That way they wouldn't pollute to the detriment of the rest of us. Keep at least half of the planes down on the ground on such days. The chi-chi passengers could still get to Chicago every day, and many others could take more environmentally benign transportation modes, might wait a day, or might not travel at all.
This proposal affects profits! The airlines will absolutely hate the idea. So will Disney World with all its faux green exhibits and energy hog roller coasters. But what's wrong with the proposal? It's a compromise. The uncompromising alternative is to not fly jets at all.
Down the road (translation, Boeing wouldn't work on environmental issues for 100 years if we let them off, they'd wait until their polluting company was as dead as GM or Chrysler, then go cry for a national bailout) we need jets or prop planes that don't dispense so much water vapor into the atmosphere or that don't fly as high.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Real Contrail Issue
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bizeeb on Jan 27, 2009 7:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My definition of Hell...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Fine, just explain how a kerosene fire melted tons of steel
Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: Fine, just explain how a kerosene fire melted tons of steel
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Fine, just explain how a kerosene fire melted tons of steel
Posted by: Obijuan
» RE: Fine, just explain how a kerosene fire melted tons of steel
Posted by: EncinoM
» No steel structure has ever collapsed from fire, period.
Posted by: thornwolf
» Bet you said that when those same people talked about the economy...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: My definition of Hell...
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: My definition of Hell...
Posted by: bizeeb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zimbly on Jan 27, 2009 7:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real point is "PEOPLE NO LONGER TRUST THEIR GOVERNMENT" and fear(and quite rightly so) that their Government or more correctly the Pentagon are trying out some weird experiments on their own people. The fact remains that there exists a huge "disconnect" from the Pentagon and the People, the mistrust goes very deep. Thats the point.
Arguing about whether this has basis in so called reality is idiotic.
Now the argument goes..'TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT THEY HAVE YOUR BEST INTERESTS AT HEART"...yeah right..when Hell freezes over.
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
This is what we have seen, especially with the Bush Administration.
This article is suggesting that the public mistrust is just about "kooks believing in Chem trails"...... the fear and mistrust goes way deeper than that.....and won't go away because some clown writes a clever piece of propaganda.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Marshalldoc on Jan 27, 2009 8:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jan 27, 2009 2:40 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not necessarily that what is being done is bad, but when you don't tell people, they are naturally going to suspect something's up.
I want to know why they do it and what risk it poses to the health of living creatures, if any.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Jan 29, 2009 7:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems sad that we're so much more afraid than we used to be, afraid of those in power and of what we see, if we think it's unusual. I asked my husband alot of questions about contrails last night, because he's the only person I know who has flown so many years. he's puzzled at the alarm over certain patterns, the criss-crossing grids. He was very matter-of-fact, there are more planes, those are planes flying at different altitudes, to different places, so of course the trails cross. He said that not all altitudes will result in contrails, and that flying along even at a steady altitude you will sometimes leave them and sometimes not. Military flyers have a special interest in contrails; they give you away. He also said that military planes do 180 turns. Anyone who didn't know this could certainly be puzzled observing it, especially if it's a tanker up doing refueling exercises and flying in a race-track oval for a long time.
Yes, open-minded, skeptical, but not eager to see the worst, or dismiss everything. If we're afraid of everything, or just afraid of too much, Bush can really say Mission Accomplished. It keeps Republican thinking in power even when Republicans aren't.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Birdland on Jan 27, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: star gazer
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: star gazer, me, too, and I don't see this!
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jan 27, 2009 8:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so bad in LA some days that a once-blue sky is white by the end of the day, all without any clouds. I can literally watch these trails come out of the planes (that are so high up you can barely see them), sit there and spread out for hours.
I'm sorry but that was NOT going on 15 years ago.
Unlike many so-called "conspiracy theorists," I don't claim to know what their purpose are. I'd like to think it's actually some plan to combat global warming, or something to that effect. However, to deny it's going on is completely batshit crazy. All you have to do is look up.
And it does go on world-wide because I was on a message board once and they posted pics from I think Norway. Apparently it goes on everywhere, and NOT just major metropolitan areas.
It's crazy to me that more people don't notice it. It's right in front of your face. Watch a jet fly from the airport. The contrail dissipates in a couple of minutes, if even that long. Then, watch one of those streaks go across the sky and spread out for HOURS.
WHY?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, it is over major cities but its also in rural America.... I would guess...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Why is it a "conspiracy" when it's right in front of your face?
Posted by: season
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lugoteehalt on Jan 27, 2009 8:19 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Power can't train us from birth explicitly to avoid power unfriendly theories; so it has to come up with a cryptic method of doing the same thing: It tells us to adjure paranoid theories and conspiracy theories because 98 times out of a hundred these are power unfriendly.
Try it: Think of a non-paranoid theory of something, say 911, then think of a paranoid one. Which is the least power friendly?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bbruhwiler8 on Jan 27, 2009 8:20 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: DENY THIS! -->
Posted by: EncinoM
» How did you reach a conclusion? You certainly didn't watch the film.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: How did you reach a conclusion? You certainly didn't watch the film.
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: How did you reach a conclusion? You certainly didn't watch the film.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FDISK on Jan 27, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe he should go to Google - more - video and do a search for The Disclosure Project Briefing and watch what 21 former US Govt. workers had to say (they were from the Army, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard, Air Force, CIA, NSA, DOD, NRO, FBI and FEMA) about UFOs and other related issues. Or how bout he also watch Evidence The Case For NASA UFOS and see what NASA lies about...
As far as chemtrails has he EVER seriously looked at the skies in the last 21 years...give me a break, contrails my butt. Contrails go away in minutes these lines that expand don't for days.
Maybe he should go to www.carnicom.com and READ all the REAL evidence..
There are conspiracy theories of course but Kennedy was murdered and William F. Colby (former CIA Director) was found floating down the Potomac....I could go on and on with EVIDENCE instead of just spouting the words conspiracy theory, get it Mr. Alexander Zaitchik???????
Your obviously just trying to sell stories isn't that your job? LOL
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Jan 27, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally have no idea if there are government programs designed to spray toxins on the general public, this is the first I have heard of it. I DO know that the CIA performed tests in the 60's in San Francisco where innocent civilians were unknowingly dosed with LSD so they could study the effects. This experiment was documented and information about this was released many years after the fact. At the time I am sure many people thought this to be a ridiculous rumor as well. But it happened, a purely idiotic, government funded conspiracy to perform experiments on an ignorant civilian population.
This one event does not imply that all conspiracy theories are correct, far from it, but it should indicate that this kind of behavior is possible and has occurred on many occasions.
I am not the person to tell you that there are aliens watching us or secret government programs behind every locked door, but I do believe the human heart is capable of anything. Any form of deceit, murder, torture, or enslavement that you can imagine is happening right now all over the world. There are crazy people out there and not all of them are poor vagrants on street corners or foreign dictators, some are in corner offices on the top floor of banks or government offices in the Pentagon.
You don't have to believe in conspiracy theories but if you don't realize that mass torture exists or that money is manipulated for the benefit of the few or that population control as an issue is studied by governments and think tanks all over the world or that media is not controlled from the top down, well I am not sure what to tell you.
Those who are in a position to really affect the world around them, whether through personal drive or wealth, believe they are as just and right as everybody else.
I guess we will sit back and hope they are.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bizatch! on Jan 27, 2009 8:58 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I put my own feelings on hold after reaching a dead end with many of the observations on offer concerning this phenomenon... I don't totally follow Scott Steven's line of questioning, for instance, nor can I accept the depopulation scenario... and yet, the fact remains: these streaks in the skies are present some days more than others, and the strange patterns which don't conform to regular flight paths (know your local air routes!) are very intriguing to me.
Zaitchik should follow his own smug advice: watching the skies for any length of time on a clear 'spray day' will assuredly NOT reveal fluffy bunnies or sprawling dragons. These lines in the sky, for whatever reason, turn into odd smudges that last for hours and spread out in ways that normal contrails never have in the history of physics. I have been watching the skies for years after following up on a buddy's 'conspiracy theory', and I overcame initial suspicions enough to believe that something bizarre is taking place up there.
If nothing else, what I learned about HAARP or other military secrets which have been recently revealed can be credited to acknowledging the mystery of chemtrails. I will not be surprised to see an expose of this covert operation appear in a few year's time. I can't venture a guess as to what is going on at present, but I've learned to keep an open mind about this phenomenon. I call it 'speculating', not 'conspiracy theories'!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jan 27, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why are we discussing contrails, or rather "Chemtrails"?
Because jet contrails do effect weather, hence climate. In fact a 2000 Environmental Protection Agency fact sheet unequivocally states in it summery:Contrails are composed primarily of water (in the form of ice crystals) and do not pose health risks to humans. They do affect the cloudiness of the Earth’s atmosphere, however, and therefore might affect atmospheric temperature and climate (emphasis added)."
So what might the real conspiracy behind this "chemtrails" conspiracy?
Most contrails in the continental United States come from domestic jet airliners. If the Obama administration, or any future administration, decides to do something to eliminate or, at the very least, slow contrail formation, then goodbye airline industry as we now know it. At least that must be the fears of airline executives.
So by surreptitiously promoting these "chemtrail" nutcases the airline industry is off the hook vis-a-vis climate change. Once the "chemtrail" conspiracy is thoroughly discredited and debunked, airline executives can tell the public, "See, our contrails are nothing more than happy little rain-cloud makers. So when you look up into the sky, that's not the hot exhaust of a jet engine you see. That's a baby rainbow." Or some such nonsense.
Then it's back to business as usual without the bad old EPA breathing down the airline industry's neck thanks to some nice men in Congress. While the rest of us rest assured that those contrails overhead in no way contribute to the degradation of our worldwide climate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The best way to cover up a real conspiracy
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artcalight on Jan 27, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Me either.... they are capable, as most sociopaths are, of just...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 9:33 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: alternet 5 stars
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: alternet 5 stars
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: alternet 5 stars
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DavidR on Jan 27, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an eloquent 'down to earth' black man toting a supposed bag of goodies soothes minds of the masses of self-defined progressivists. the future is still grim people. we are all conditioned robots to some extent. YOU are too distracted to realize these things because YOU apparently have chosen the right opinions and life philosophies to lull yourself into your current state of complacency and 'security' and away from the other 85% of the world that lives in shit because of the MONEY SYSTEM that YOU support everyday. money has become god. it is what we strive and long for and what we need for survival. thats why it will slowly be taken away from you. (:
http://patriotsquestion911.com
you likely group all 'conspiracies' and those that research them in the same bag, and you attach all your preconceived notions (or should i say those of others that you've taken on as your own) as a subtly self-deceitful (maybe even sub-conscious) means of reassuring yourself that this world is just fine and that those that challenge this notion are all loonies.
as for chemtrails i have no idea. all i know is that we are ALL guilty for doing nothing to end war and poverty and to remove from power those that have manipulated from behind the scenes. really people we could figure it out. we just choose not to.
prove me wrong you fucking robot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
dont drink the tap water.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Jan 27, 2009 10:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Global dimming
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: Global dimming—the site of the Nova program
Posted by: Earthian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Juven on Jan 27, 2009 10:08 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 9/11
Posted by: willymack
» Great post.... really. You summed it up nicely...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenferret on Jan 27, 2009 10:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I have an album called "Modern Guilt"? Wow.
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jan 27, 2009 10:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Jan 27, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Calm down people.
Whether it is from chemtrails or fluoride in the water or Osama Bin Laden sticking a nuke up our ass, death a destruction is just around the corner!
Actually, the major causes of death are: eating too much, smoking too much, sitting on your ass too much, car wrecks, that sort of thing.
Do any of you walk around paranoid of french fries and volkswagens? Well, why NOT?
Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we will all die! Perhaps the universe will be better off for it.
Are any of you people happy? How un-fun to be afraid all the damn time.
Life sucks and then you die. So f****** what?
Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!
Luv,
Granny
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ronerer on Jan 27, 2009 10:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider the offhand dismissal of global warming during the late 1990’s. Can one imagine such an offhand dismissal of the subject at this date? It is my opinion that Americans and the worldwide internet audience do not need to endure such offhand mockery of what many consider to be of great importance from a news-source such as Alter Net. The world has suffered much from the offhand mockery of immensely important issues from the shrill pundits of the corporate right.
One should ask for a better quality of reporting and from Alter Net contributors.
The amount of aerosol material pumped into the atmosphere by each jet aircraft is immense and should be of concern in that subject alone.
The additional issues surrounding this subject are that the jet-engine aerosol consists of various nano-particles, heavy metals and potentially lethal chemicals; scientifically documented and linked with URL’s on any of the websites so quickly dismissed by the author.
This issue will not go away even with the type of shrill offhand dismissal exhibited by the author. Thank goodness the topic of Global Warming has not suffered the fate of such offhand dismissals.
Why does Alter Net choose to publish an offhand dismissal of this issue of great importance to millions of people around the world?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Great post... thanks
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jgilb on Jan 27, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet, we seem to have a need to be frightened. Even if it's not true, we make shit up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» - - - -Chix Little was a TRUE PROPHET
Posted by: Anthhh
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Richard House on Jan 27, 2009 11:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LetsSaveDemocracy on Jan 27, 2009 11:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i used think that chemtrails were just a paranoid suspicion. i used to scoff at 9/11 truth activists too. until i bothered to get informed in an intelligent and thorough way.
here is an article by the kindly founder of the H Bomb and his speculations about how to avert the effects of global warming. We can a) reduce consumption or b) try this cockamamie plan to scatter throughout the atmosphere aluminum oxide crystals to reflect sunlight back to where it came from. I wonder what one they tried. Anyone who can't see that 9/11 was an inside job, and that there are clearly very suspcious patterns caused frequently by non commercial jets, is not playing with a full deck. they are victims of propaganda, or other psychological conditions which prevent them from seeing something that overwhelms them. i won't pretend to know exactly what chem trails are but it is obviously a real phenomenon and the journalist who wrote this piece is not a real or competent investigator.
but most impressive to me is the quality of the responses to this and other (particularly 9/11 related) propaganda. Alternet should be boycotted. do you think we can orchetrate one from the comments section?
All he had to do was google Edward Teller Chemtrails.
i can't post the link because it is too long a word.
debunk that, dumbshit!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: dward Teller/Founder of H Bomb/Chem Trails
Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: dward Teller/Founder of H Bomb/Chem Trails
Posted by: sausage
» Edward Teller had nothing whatsoever to do with "chemtrails".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: dward Teller had nothing whatsoever to do with "chemtrails".
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: dward Teller had nothing whatsoever to do with "chemtrails".
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 11:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON MASS EXTERMINATION EVER SINCE. THEY HAVE TRIED ALMOST EVERYTHING THAT THEY COULD THINK OF; WARS, POISONING FOOD AND WATER AND MEDICINES, DEBT, SPRAYING TOXINS, EUGENICS PROGRAMS, MANUFACTURING KILLING DISEASES IN LABS AND SPREADING THEM THROUGH TAX EXEMPT 'HUMANITARIAN' ORGANIZATIONS, MERCURY IN VACCINES, FISH TOOTH FILLINGS, LEAD IN TIN CAN LINERS, PAINT GASOLINE, TOXIC FLUORIDE IN WATER SUPPLIES TOOTHPASTES, GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS, TOXIC SUGAR SUBSTITUTES, BISPHENOL-A ADDED TO PLASTIC FOOD CONTAINERS, INJECTING RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES DIRECTLY INTO UNSUSPECTING PATIENTS IN HOSPITALS, DEVELOPING RACE SPECIFIC BIO-WEAPONS, SHUTTING DOWN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FIGHTING INFECTIONS, DRASTICALLY REDUCING SOCIAL AID PROGRAMS, INCREASING HEALTH CARE COSTS TO UNAFFORDABLE, INCREASING THE COST OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MASS MEDIA PROPAGANDA BRAIN WASHING, KIDNAPPING CHILDREN (OVER 1 MILLION KIDS GO MISSING IN THE U.S. ALONE EVERY YEAR), 3rd WORLD SLAVE STATES, FORCED PLANNED PARENTHOOD, LAND MINES MADE TO APPEAR TO BE TOYS, 'DIRTY' AMMUNITION MADE WITH DEPLETED URANIUM, SECRET DEVELOPMENT OF 'FAST ACTING' CANCERS, OFFICIAL DIET RECOMENDATIONS DESIGNED TO KILL, HAARP, DELAY OF NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AID, ISOLATION OF COUNTRIES FROM FOOD SOURCES (PLANNED STARVATION), PLANNED RELIGIOUS AND IDIOLOGICAL CONFLICTS, THOUSANDS OF EXTERMINATION CAMPS, NEUTRALIZATION OR ASSASINATION OF ANY LEADER PROPOSING LOVE AND PEACE, SETTING UP CENTRAL BANKS TO DEPRIVE THE MASSES OF ANY VALUE BASED ECONOMY, PROMOTING MENTAL WELLNESS THROUGH PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, SETTING UP PRIVATELY OWNED PRISONS FOR PROFIT, SCHOOLING OUR POLICE AND MILITARY TO SHOW NO MERCY TOWARD THE PEOPLE, DEVELOPING LASER, SOUND AND MICROWAVE WEAPONS TO BE USED AGAINST THE GENERAL POPULATION, EXEMPTING THEMSELVES FROM THE LAW, TAXING THE LOWER CLASSES TO SUPPORT THE ULTRA-WEALTHY, RESISTING ALL SAFETY STANDARDS IN INDUSTRY, INCREASING ALLOWABLE TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASES BY INDUSTRY, BRIBING OR BLACKMAILING GOVERNMENT AND RELIGOUS LEADERS TO BE SHILLS FOR THEIR CULLING AGENDA, POISONING BABY FOOD PRODUCTS, RUNNING THE WORLDS ILLICIT DRUG TRADES SUCH AS POT, HEROIN, OPIUM AND COCAINE AND, OF COURSE, MASS GENOCIDE.
DIET INJECTIONS AND INJUNCTIONS WILL COMBINE FROM A VERY EARLY AGE TO PRODUCE THE SORT OF CHARACTER AND THE SORT OF BELIEFS THAT THE AUTHORITIES CONSIDER DESIRABLE AND ANY SERIOUS CRITICISM OF THE POWERS THAT BE WILL BECOME PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
-BERTRAN RUSSELL
(THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON HUMANITY)
CHINA WAS ABLE TO TURN THE CORNER AND BECOME THE LEADING WORLD SUPER POWER BECAUSE THEY HAVE A POLICE STATE AND THEY ARE ABLE TO FORCE PEOPLE TO STOP REPRODUCING.
-DR. ERIC R. BIANKA
ALTHOUGH THE ARISTOCRACY HAVE MURDERED MANY BILLIONS, THEIR ADVISORS (THE BILDERBURGERS, CLUB OF ROME AND THE ROTHSCHILDS CENTRAL BANKING GROUP), HAVE TOLD THE BLOODLINE ELITE THAT THE METHODS USED THUS FAR HAVE FAILED TO KILL AS MANY HUMANS AS THEY WOULD LIKE.
WORRIED ABOUT A MASS WORLDWIDE PEASANT REVOLUTION DUE TO ENHANCED COMMUNICATION AND TRAVEL, THEY HAVE SET UP A NEW PROGRAM OR PLAN TO EXTERMINATE MOST OF THE WORLDS POPULATION - FORCE - A WORLDWIDE POLICE TERROR STATE.
IT IS TIME FOR YOUR SHEPHERDS TO BRING THE SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE. THEY HAVE BEEN HIRING RUTHLESS, USUALLY CRIMINAL MENTAL DEFICIENTS, MERCENARY SOLDIERS (THUGS) TO HEARD YOU, BEAT AND TORTURE YOU, ENSLAVE YOU AND KILL YOU WHILE STEALING YOUR PROPERTY.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» There's this key on your keyboard...
Posted by: Praktik
» RE: There's this key on your keyboard...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: There's this key on your keyboard...
Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: i cut and pasted it
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: There's this key on your keyboard...
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: There's this key on your keyboard...
Posted by: EncinoM
» Hahahahaa, I just spit out my coffee all over my keyboard...
Posted by: Prophit
» When you scream you lose credibility, however, I suspect your ...
Posted by: Prophit
» It's Bertran(d) Russell
Posted by: bizeeb
» i call em like i see em ..troll
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: i call em like i see em ..troll
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: CHEMTRILS ARE ONLY PART OF IT
Posted by: graemebacque
» RE: CHEMTRILS ARE...GREAT WORK HANGTRAITOR!
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Anthhh on Jan 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“... a group running affairs in the US from behind the stage aims to dominate the Middle East fully. So, one should not be ignorant of enemy conspiracies and plots,”
-President Ahmadinejad told visiting Iraqi National Security Advisor Muvafaq al-Rubai on Thursday.
The HCGRA Threat Level is RED right now. (Homeland Citizens against "Groups Running Affairs")
The STAGE IS SET.
A FEW FACTORS INCLUDE:
-no one was held acountable for the obvious crimes involved in the 9-11 false flag..
-no one is recognizing the crimes against the
ISLAMIC CIVILIZATIONS of AFGHANISTAN IRAQ PALESTINE.
-no one is recognizing their rights.
-no one plans to apologize.
-no one plans to try to make compensation for their crimes and "mistakes"
-no one plans to reform the structure of the UNSC which will allow and encourage the NEXT FAKE ATTACK.
No...No one stops the cycle.
It is only a matter of time.
The plotters have now made America appear innocent with OBAMA.
Now they are going to FALSE-FLAG ATTACK US AGAIN. THIS YEAR.
IRAQ IS STARTING TO SHAKE HERSELF OFF.
SHE WILL BE FRAMED AGAIN THIS YEAR.
OBAMA will "righteously" complete the grip on IRAQ, through conspiracy and plots such as 9-11.
SPEAK UP NOW.
THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: buddyedgewood on Jan 27, 2009 12:12 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They spray us and then further program us through TV, gaming and Internet porn. This is to keep us docile and compliant - just like cattle and sheep.
Why would they want to depopulate the planet? That would only hurt tax revenues, which are used to corral and control the populous that doesn't have or watch TV or have access to the Internet.
Come on people! Wake up from your chemically induced coma! It's COMMON SENSE! Obama is in on it too, otherwise he would never have been President!
;-)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: put down the crank pipe...
Posted by: sausage
» Your question "Why would they want to depopulate the planet? That would only hurt tax revenues,"
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jan 27, 2009 12:38 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He goes on to tell us to lie down in the grass, look up at the sky and enjoy life.
Is that supposed to be helpful or enlightening?
One of my senators, Kay Bailey Hutchison, introduced weather modification research legislation, s. 1807, but I'm not sure what became of it. There has been other weather modification legislation too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Kay Bailey Hutchison is one of the worst offenders....A Bush gofer...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jan 27, 2009 12:53 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having worked in a federal agency let me tell you, the permanent agencies of United States government couldn't put together a conspiracy worth its name if they had to. What conspiracy theorists don't understand is that the federal bureaucracy is made up of hundreds, maybe thousands of individual agencies, staffs and bureaus all fighting for a piece of the federal budget. They only conspire against themselves.
So keep it up conspiracy nuts! While you go chasing after black helicopters and "chemtrails" the real conspiracies are being concocted in Wall Street and main street by your locally elected officials to sell off, piecemeal, public assets to private corporate interests who have no interest in promoting the general welfare.
Yep, all you conspiracy nuts are doing is providing cover for the real villains of this set piece, corporate America and its goal of monetary world domination through globalization.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't think you have to remind us that the fed. gov. is a bureaucratic money-pit
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Wow! You know what I think before I do!!!
Posted by: sausage
» Don't "tell" us what you don't Know Mr. CrackPipe
Posted by: PointMan
» Put down the crank pipe...
Posted by: sausage
» Put down your BS projection Mr. CrackPipe
Posted by: PointMan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Amerikagulag on Jan 27, 2009 12:58 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've lost your credibility with this article as far as i'm concerned. Without actually investigation, or using any time based research, simply publishing a couple of 'opinions' doesn't put the issue to rest.
Jet CONTRAILS consist of ice crystals. Ice is HEAVIER than air and will dissipate and fall, whereas these 'plumes' remain airborne and SPREAD exponentially.
The fact that a democrat is in office doesn't make everything ok.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chemtrails
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Chemtrails; no, I don't notice them
Posted by: Beck
» Hmmm, where do you live???
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Hmmm, where do you live???
Posted by: Beck
» One possible reason is the problems they have had with Canadians...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zelda253 on Jan 27, 2009 1:00 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Amerikagulag on Jan 27, 2009 1:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Amerikagulag on Jan 27, 2009 1:12 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....yeah, I know, the pilot forgot his keys and had to turn back.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chemtrails
Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Chemtrails
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Chemtrails
Posted by: rockpicker
» Hi, Rockpicker... haven't seen you in a while....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Chemtrails
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chorton on Jan 27, 2009 1:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Second, it is easy to believe in conspiracies when the whole government functions as an ongoing conspiracy, controlled by a relatively small cabal of super-rich families who manipulate it and the news we get about it to support their activities and preserve their wealth and power. That again is supportable by scientific analysis, although you wouldn't know it from reading the Springfield Republican or watching Fox News. And again, the wingnut conspiracy theorists serve their interests by distracting the public from the real conspiracies, such as the one to start a war in Iraq (now exposed) or with Iran (on hold).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jan 27, 2009 2:25 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just want to know what they are spraying, because they are. You can see jets leaving contrails and it's not even close to the same thing. Contrails don't spread out for hours and cover the sky. At least they didn't 15 years ago.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: meria on Jan 27, 2009 2:28 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: chemtrails are NOT contrails
Posted by: helenwheels
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 27, 2009 4:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jan 27, 2009 5:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The water that is expelled from your lungs turns to a liquid, and then a solid, and then mixes and dissipates into the air around you , all in relatively short order.
Same thing happens with aircraft exhaust.
That's normal. That's what has been observed for decades. That's what we can explain and expect.
Persistent aerosol trails that expand and merge into banks that eventually occlude our beautiful blue skies are another matter.
Clifford Carnicom's name is conspicuously absent from this discussion, so far. I would urge everyone interested to look him up, as he deserves more credit than anyone aforementioned, and probably has way more information than most casual readers care to expose themselves to.
www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I know about Clifford and tried to find his lab results from his...
Posted by: Prophit
» Forgot to mention how much I appreciate your logic and common sense...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Forgot to mention how much I appreciate your logic and common sense...
Posted by: rockpicker
» hey, how did you know I was a trout fisherwoman???? LOL
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: hey, how did you know I was a trout fisherwoman???? LOL
Posted by: rockpaker
» Here's what troubles me about what is hypothesized here
Posted by: Beck
» RE: On a really cold day...
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Styve on Jan 27, 2009 6:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bummer Alternet doesn't screen out hacks like this clown.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This guy's an idiot! 'Nuf said!
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beguiled on Jan 27, 2009 7:47 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Air Plane Exhaust and Debunker Exhaust
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jan 27, 2009 7:52 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
forteantimes.com ... in case you don't know.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» LOL, given your the one with the link...... and no one else, you ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alternetiscrapola on Jan 27, 2009 7:53 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025
Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC)
It's not a conspiracy, it is an agenda. Fuck this site!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That was the nail in the coffin for this fake left site
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redroadtraveler on Jan 27, 2009 7:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chemtrails Are Different
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Jan 27, 2009 8:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One other time in mid-day I saw three big circles which looked like big bowls of clouds in the sky. One had a funnel coming down in the middle toward the ground.
I have no idea how they got there. They were not normal formations is all I know.
I took digital photos of them. I wish I could show them but I don't think this site allows them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mangotea on Jan 27, 2009 8:54 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» before rainy weather
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: before rainy weather
Posted by: graemebacque
» RE: military planes often fly that low, and make turns that commercial planes do not
Posted by: graemebacque
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Jan 27, 2009 9:56 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if its conspiracy but sure is bad for us to ingest this stuff.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» organic?
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yodo2 on Jan 27, 2009 10:02 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the case of 9/11, 2 that immediately come to mind are from experienced commercial pilots, (offhand ,I do not have their names), who tell us that it is impossible for the aircraft to have made the turns the aircraft was claimed to have made into the tower.
The 2nd was the collapse of building7, into its footprint from no known cause.I beleive the official report gave it a one sentence remark.
Similarly, the amazing bullet that took about
8 turns through Kennedy and Connerly( who convieniently changed his story to oblige the erratic bullet) remains our official history.
So it is too, with chemtrails where lab analysis has shown the great increase in concentration of both Aluminum and Barium salts , both having applications for using the atmosphere for communication and wave energy potentials, that have been reseached extensively by the military as a "force Multipier and weather controller.
If you wish to present any reasonable counter point, only counter evidence to the physical facts bear weight.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: watching-n-waiting on Jan 27, 2009 10:58 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As with flying saucers, hundreds of YouTube clips purport to capture cities "getting pasted" by secret government planes. Dozens of chemtrails Web sites compete for the loyalty and business of a sprawling, gullible and increasingly global chemtrails flock. Like the white lines that are its obsession, the chemtrails scene crisscrosses with every other strand in the pantheon of cosmic conspiracy culture. Most chemtrails sites, like the lovable dontchemtrailmebro.com, also peddle in 9/11 Truth, alien contact, Northern Idaho survivalism and the "suppressed" theories of the twin martyred wizards of etheric energy...
I dunno...maybe the sarcasm is lost on me but that dig at 9/11 truth seekers just seems a bit too skewed. What's wrong with questioning what is clearly a cover up? But even though it was mentioned in the artcile it's feels a bit off-topic to go there.
...back to jet fuel. I am not one of the "gullible chemtrail flock" (sorry but "yuck" to that term)- this is the first I've heard about it but I'm willing to look into it. If that makes me a conspiracy theorist then so be it (besides I'm beginning to think if one is not a conspiracy theorist then one is not paying attention).
However I do know that jet fuel and jet fuel residue IS responsible for the water table being contaminated by perchlorate with devastating effects on our health from hypothyroidism to birth defects to cancer. So in light of these facts perhaps it would be wise to at least consider the possibility that there is something to the chemtrail thing.
I know one thing for certain, when I don't know something for certain then I don't say that I know a thing for certain.
Oops here I go...SORRY... but I can't let the 9/11 thing go that easily. I know for certain that (i) in the most protected country in the world it is more than a little strange that Norad was unable to scramble jets while passenger planes were doing u-turns in the sky; and that (ii) there isn't a single photograph available of a passenger airplane having hit the most protected (and photographed) building in the most protected country in the the world. There's a whole lot more I do know for certain about 9/11 but I try not to get too far off topic.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ericthefoolish on Jan 27, 2009 11:14 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does this work? It's capitalism dummy. You don't have to do any work. You don't have to interview anyone. You don't have to spend money on supplies, research, or long hours reading. Instead, you go by what you already know and your biased opinion writes the damn article for you
This writer is complete crap in action. I have done more research then this "journalist" has in one night. I have looked up in the sky. I have noticed the differing trails, the cloud formations, and the grid like patterns.
Another thing that was not mentioned is cloud seeding which has been admittedly been going on for a long time. Why wouldn't this have any weight in this article? There are Gov't documents that talk about using chemicals on the public. THEY HAVE USED CHEMICALS ON PEOPLE. When will you get it through your thick skulls that this Govt could care less about you.
Oh and all the people that think 9/11 was exactly what the Gov't has told us...HAS NEVER, EVER, EVER opened a book and read independently the evidence behind 9/11. NOT ONE PAGE, NOT ONE WORD, NOT ONE MURMUR. Anyone with half a brain would look at the evidence and question it. GET A CLUE, OPEN A BOOK, AND FOR ONCE, JUST ONCE, THINK FOR YOUR DAMN SELVES.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sad Journalism / Thank-you
Posted by: watching-n-waiting
» RE: Sad Journalism / Thank-you
Posted by: ericthefoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJAXXXXX on Jan 27, 2009 11:20 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it is any consolation to those seeking the truth on this issue, we seem to be in the majority here, judging from the posts and their ratings. This gives me some measure of hope.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Alternet is a real disappointment on issues like these..
Posted by: watching-n-waiting
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Jan 28, 2009 4:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, you do not do a very good job of providing any real evidence that chemtrails are not part of a greater conspiracy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jan 28, 2009 6:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But as stated in the article:
A typical comment left under a chemtrails YouTube clip warns viewers that they are now breathing "ethylene dibromide, nano-particulates of aluminum and barium, cationic polymer fibers with unidentified bioactive material, and tiny parasitic nematode eggs of some type."
If this soup were in the air and going up your nose, it would be easily testable. So instead of throwing out opinions and conspiricies, do the testing.
But we all know that would be to easy and then the truth would be out, and people could not get off on their "religious" beliefs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ClassAct on Jan 28, 2009 7:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» testing program
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: testing program
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: testing program
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jan 28, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2815320198655156407
and here is Carnicom's website:
www.carnicom.com/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: the director on Jan 28, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether the evil scientists are clever enough to do what the conspirators say is irrelevant.
How much new air do we get daily?
Whether it be car emissions, plane, factory or any furnace we are “burning down the house” and creating a soup of chemicals in our atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels which may make this whole question mute for our children’s children.
We study sulfur, a crystalline mineral, which when burned at temperatures above 271 degree F. is vaporized into the upper atmosphere as little crystal mirrors which block solar energy to the surface of the Earth while warming the atmosphere.
Atmospheric warming with global cooling may be the correct perspective.
Now lets mix some of these chemical compounds which result from combustion of fossil fuels and we have high school chemistry in the making. And we get acid rain in all of its varieties.
Jet engines can use other fuels other than kerosene to fly the friendly sky, cars can run on other non carbon based fuels, such as hydrogen, water? Electricity, compressed air, etc. The technology has been available but not compared with cheap fossil fuels.
We have two choices:
Continue the madness of burning fossil fuels and write a note of apology to our future generations.
Or we can end the fossil fuel aspect of the industrial revolution, we can make plastics out of coal and crude, but no more fuel that leaves burned hydrocarbons in the atmosphere.
When a volcano such as Kilauea bleaches its exhaust skyward those elements created in the caldron are bio available in the cycles of life. When we burn the decomposed fodder of fossil fuels we do so by adding synthetic chemicals which have never seen the mouth of a volcano.
This is a pleas which I believe could resonate with everyone save for the oil giants.
No chemicals on the ground, in the air, in our food, in our water, nor in our meds.
We synthesize medications solely for the patents, the profits, when the while willow bark may be the best form of Aspirin, which was synthesized from coal tar.
Whether evil chemtrails or evil contrails like all the water that is, was; All the air we are breathing now is the same air we have been breathing since the beginning, no new air.
Patrick McGean
Director
Live Blood and Cellular Matrix Study
Body Human Project
organicsulfur@sisna.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hey, you may have something here.... I usually don't engage in the...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: milegallons on Jan 28, 2009 9:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joshua65 on Jan 28, 2009 9:46 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is very secret military stuff, and is not normal jet exaust or normal contrail.
REMEMBER,ANY OTHER EXPLANATIONS IS A LIE,
DISCLOSE AEROSOL OPERATIONS NOW
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CHEMTRAILS ARE MILITARY AEROSOL FOR RADAR PURPOSES AND SATELLITES CONNECTIONS
Posted by: kellysgarden
» We also now have proof (check testimony in my above post) that they are also...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: CHEMTRAILS ARE MILITARY AEROSOL FOR RADAR PURPOSES AND SATELLITES CONNECTIONS
Posted by: charles000
» RE: CHEMTRAILS ARE MILITARY AEROSOL FOR RADAR PURPOSES AND SATELLITES CONNECTIONS
Posted by: redbridge
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pinkfloydd on Jan 28, 2009 11:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will have to agree with the poster above who commented on the subtle yet clear change in Alternet's latest offerings. I posted something to this effect a few weeks back. I no longer check here daily for my news, it just seems as if there's been a shift in journalistic priorities. It is becoming a little too MSM-like for me. As if something, or someone, has taken a vested interest in making Alternet more central.
I'm in 100% agreement about the propaganda in this ridiculous article.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EncinoM on Jan 28, 2009 1:07 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» There are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see!!!!
Posted by: Prophit
» So when are you going for your glasses...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Is there any difference...
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: Is there any difference...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Is there any difference...
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Is there any difference...
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: Is there any difference...
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Earthian on Jan 28, 2009 1:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To find out about the effects of contrails on global dimming just search these terms:
"global dimming"
and
nova
or go here:
www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/dimming.htm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nuuon on Jan 28, 2009 1:56 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's quite simple really. What passes for a "left" is actually nothing more than the "official" opposition. Wannabes-- Hoping that one day (especially those "lefties" who pass themselves off as writers) they will find cushy jobs in major media outlets, or cushy well-paying teaching jobs at some well-endowed university.
The left "leadership" is so obsessed with being accepted as "responsible" (with the accompanying whimsical thoughts of future acceptance as pundits on CNN), that they will sell their own children down the sewer. I do not exaggerate here, because in fact, this is exactly what they are doing even while they are too stupid to realize it.
Simply stated: Leftist leadership CANNOT be trusted when and where it counts: Not on the issue of who really organized the "terrorist" attack in America on 9/11/01; not on the issue of who really organized the "terrorist" attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, the Oklahoma City "terrorist" attack-- one can go on and on. Never mind how emasculated the "leftist leadership" has proven to be on the carnage that Israel unleashes whenever it feels like. Because to face up to the fact of these conspiracies would demand that they would have to move beyond rhetorical "radicalism" to hands-on "revolution" and the "left" hasn't had the balls for that since the FBI (and other government agencies) definitively kicked their collective assess in the late 1960's.
The leftist "leadership" can be depended upon to bitch up when it counts and thus there are untold millions who would gladly join it but who know that the leadership is either infiltrated, manipulated, stupid, cowardly or just plain opportunistic. The average "leftist leader" is little more than a George Bush with an "A" average.
Yes, the American "left" is a joke and those so-called "conspiracy theorists" (multi-millions strong) are not going to waste their time listening to or following a bunch of bitch-up artists. Because the left WILL ABSOLUTELY sell you out exactly when and where it counts. And articles like this provides us with documented and definitive proof. In fact, every time comfortable whimps like Noam Chomsky say or write dumb shit like "Oswald was working alone" or "it doesn't matter who did 9/11" the shame I feel makes me almost puke.
In the final analysis, this article was nothing more than one of those "see-I-am-responsible-so-please-give-me-a-job" resume stuffers.
The planet's population is going to be fried, starved and beaten into a hoard begging for world government-- and this will have happened on the watch of America's left: A prototypical toothless tiger without a courageous bone in its body. You don't take such people seriously, you read them for entertainment purposes only.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why America's Left is a Toothless Tiger
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Why America's Left is a Toothless Tiger
Posted by: Nuuon
» RE: Why America's Left is a Toothless Tiger
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» Anyone who "notices" this had their eyes shut the last few months. I DO notice how lesser parties
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Anyone who "notices" this had their eyes shut the last few months. I DO notice how lesser parties
Posted by: Nuuon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blair T. Longley on Jan 28, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
any important social facts,
I have always discovered
lies and coercions were
controlling real events.
The most important of them all?
Fractional Reserve Banking
That is not a conspiracy theory!
That scam is a social fact of
the triumph of the methods
of organized crime being
able to control us all.
From there, spread out lots
of other social facts, that
all are based on realities
that lies, backed up by
violence, are in control.
It takes a paradigm shift
to realize that every one
of these things that one
investigates tend to be
interconnected, since
there are interlocking
sets of crime cartels.
They control governments.
Governments are territorial
gangsters, while the group
that controls them most is
the international bankers.
It is NOT a theory, but fact.
The whole world is being
controlled by huge lies,
backed up with lots of
violence, and that is
why chemtrails are
plausible to me ...
I do not know what they are,
but I believe there is some
real evil behind them, and,
given the FACT that an elite
have privatized the powers
to make money out of zip,
and are enslaving everyone,
and clearly have an agenda,
I have no problems with a
view that chemtrails are
all too real and too evil,
although I do not know
exactly what they were,
everything else I know
makes me believe that
all governments ARE
extremely evil, and
WOULD DO this ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thank you for an example of Peasant Fear Mentality
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Thank you for an example of Peasant Fear Mentality
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: Thank you for an example of Peasant Fear Mentality
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Thank you for an example of Peasant Fear Mentality
Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: Thank you for an example of Peasant Fear Mentality
Posted by: EncinoM
» Village Idiot Troll EncinoMuck chimes in with more BS
Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Village Idiot Troll EncinoMuck chimes in with more BS
Posted by: Blair T. Longley
Comments are closed-
Posted by: charles000 on Jan 28, 2009 4:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, I am not a "conspiracy guy" by any stretch of the imagination, but as is the case with many of the "fringe" topics floating around, there is a small grain of truth at the epicenter of the swirling clouds of so-called conspiracy theories.
Many years ago, I worked for DOE at both Lawrence Berkeley and Los Alamos national labs, my principal interest at the time was in materials science, some aspects of which in current nomenclature is referred to as "nanotechnology".
Believe it or not, there was some theoretical discussions and papers being presented which did cite two specific arenas of research that could conceivably come under the heading of "chemtrails".
One such area of interest was indeed the concept of changing the relative ableto, or reflective index of the upper atmosphere, for several reasons actually.
In the case of the former Soviet Union of the time, there was considerable interest in altering the course of the jetstreams, which are high speed "rivers" of air in the upper atmosphere that affect climatic variations.
In the case of the Russian effort, the idea was to alter the severity of the weather in Siberia and related areas, so that agricultural projects could be successfully implemented in these otherwise unusable regions. I don't know how far their experiments ever got, or even if this was actually tried, but that was their intent of the time.
The other arena of research which might possibly fall into this so-called chemtrail heading was the concept of dispensing micro particulate metallic aerosols into the upper atmosphere to alter the RF reflectivity index of specific layers of the upper atmosphere, in order to create a

