Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Chemtrails in the Sky Are Evidence of Nefarious Activities for Broad-Based Conspiracy Theorists

By Alexander Zaitchik, AlterNet. Posted January 27, 2009.


Cultural panic over pollution in the sky and changing weather patterns has given rise to a peculiar conspiracy theory about jet plane exhaust.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Anyone living near a major metropolitan airport has gazed up at the sky and seen them: patchworks of crisscrossing contrails left by passing jetliners. Most of us don't give a second thought to this common sight of a scratched-up sky. If we do, it's likely to reflect on the explosion in air traffic and its growing contribution to air pollution.

But for an expanding minority of Americans, those hanging contrails represent something much more sinister than increased carbon emissions. Since the late 1990s, a flourishing conspiracy theory subculture has been ringing the alarm that many of these contrails aren't normal vapor-and-exhaust contrails at all. Rather, they are chemtrails, mysterious and menacing chemical evidence of secret government programs to modify the weather and depopulate the planet.

Investigation into, and speculation over, the nature of these chemtrails has grown over the last decade from a marginal belief into a millions-strong Transatlantic Truth Quest, with chemtrails taking on the stature of celestial UFOs. If first-wave UFO sightings were the projection of early Cold War fears, chemtrails are the climate-change-age corollary, with cultural panic over pollution and changing weather patterns projected onto the clouds and planes in the sky.

As with flying saucers, hundreds of YouTube clips purport to capture cities "getting pasted" by secret government planes. Dozens of chemtrails Web sites compete for the loyalty and business of a sprawling, gullible and increasingly global chemtrails flock. Like the white lines that are its obsession, the chemtrails scene crisscrosses with every other strand in the pantheon of cosmic conspiracy culture. Most chemtrails sites, like the lovable dontchemtrailmebro.com, also peddle in 9/11 Truth, alien contact, Northern Idaho survivalism and the "suppressed" theories of the twin martyred wizards of etheric energy, Wilhelm Reich and Nicolai Tesla.

The chemtrails scene is a loud saloon of shouting New Age conspiracists spouting conflicting theories at the bar, with the usual assortment of hucksters and Internet paranoids filling the tables. The self-styled leaders of the movement are a diverse lot but share a consensus starting point that thousands of jets are spraying millions of gallons of "chemtrail soup" around the world on a daily basis.

Chemtrails, they hold, are easily distinguished from normal contrails by their longer duration and expansive dissipation patterns. Most of the spraying is believed to take place at night over the population centers of NATO countries, although some skywatchers suspect Russia and China are being targeted as well. As for the content of the soup and who is responsible for the program, that's where things get contentious. But the major theories are generally some variation or combination of the following:

1) U.S. oil companies are secretly spraying reflective chemicals in the air to reduce global warming and thus reduce criticism of fossil fuels.

2) A New World Order cabal -- also known as the Illuminati -- is spraying cities with pathogens in the first of a two-stage depopulation program.

3) NATO aircraft are involved in a top-secret weather-modification program, and/or are refining a new-generation of high-frequency atmospheric weapons.

4) The U.S. government is using commercial and military aircraft to assist and monitor weather events like hurricanes and tornadoes in order to both destroy enemies and pump money into the domestic economy through emergency spending/recovery bills.

Scott Stevens is a leading proponent of the fourth theory. A former TV meteorologist in Pocatello, Idaho, Stevens was fired when he began giving national radio interviews on chemtrails. He took his severance and moved to the foothills above Denver International Airport, where he now conducts plain-sight research into chemtrails full time, maintains the chemtrails site weatherwarsinfo.blogspot.com, and hosts "Amerika Now," a local AM-radio conspiracy culture talk show.

"I don't buy the theory that chemtrails are a pathogenic depopulation program," says Stevens. "You don't need to get so high in the atmosphere for that. And you don't need airplanes."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: conspiracy theory, chemtrails, haarp

Alexander Zaitchik is a freelance journalist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The chemtrails believers are no more outlandish
Posted by: cindyn on Jan 27, 2009 12:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
than those who think Barack Obama will bring any kind of meaningful change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A parable Posted by: pelican beak
» Weather control Posted by: SolarSiStar
And with one wipe...
Posted by: Obijuan on Jan 27, 2009 12:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...you are able undermine any hope of thinking logically about the conspiracies which do exist, like the banking bailout scam, the war on terror, and countless other REAL conspiracies.

Surely the author doesn't believe the official 9/11 report? Oh wait, you do.

I am disappointed in Alternet for posting this article here. It's propoganda.

obi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: pfraterdeus
» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: crazy carlos
» Alternet IS the enemy. Posted by: pfgetty
» Alternet not the enemy . . . Posted by: dustdevil
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» Your joking right??? LOL Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Your joking right??? LOL Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: Your joking right??? LOL Posted by: EncinoM
» A racist response Posted by: brunowe
» Wrong again Posted by: brunowe
» It isn't BS Posted by: brunowe
» RE: It isn't BS Posted by: pfgetty
» A "Pearl Harbor" incident? Posted by: John Sawyer
» RE: A "Pearl Harbor" incident? Posted by: John Sawyer
» AlterNet is a left-wing gatekeeper Posted by: kellysgarden
» follow the money Posted by: kellysgarden
» But who owns AlterNet? Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: jpom22
» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: praedor
» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: Shey
» RE: And with one wipe... Posted by: bcain
Airplane exhaust?
Posted by: bbruhwiler8 on Jan 27, 2009 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your whole story is based on your false conclusion that the trails we see are jet exhaust. That is preposterous and you come across as a fool for even suggesting it. Modern jets do not have a visible exhaust, and haven't had visible exhaust for decades.

Growing up in the '70s I remember seeing contrails everyday as jets flew over my home. What are contrails? As a jet flies, moisture is released from the jet engines. If the jet is high enough in the sky (a high altitude) where the humidity (moisture in the air) is low (very little moisture), then the moisture released from the engines of the jet immediately forms ice crystals because of the speed of the jet through the cool air. That is the trail that forms behind the jet.

Contrails never last more than a few seconds because water is a heat conductor, so it absorbs the heat of all the air around it, and the heat of the sun. That's why when you see a contrail behind a jet, it disappears as quickly as it appears, and the trail stays the same length the entire time as the jet flies overhead.

You will never see a contrail appear among clouds because clouds form at lower altitudes of high humidity. Clouds are a direct result of high humidity. Contrails form in low humidity, and dissipate just as quickly.

If the trail behind the jet is thick and/or the trail persists even as the jet has flown out of sight, then what you see is not a contrail. It is not water vapor, but rather must consist of some other particulates. Most people call them 'chemtrails', chem being short for chemical. I call them spray trails.

In Los Angeles, one day you will see a beautiful clear blue sky, and the next day you will see a massive display of spray trails. As you watch, the trails spread and form variations of clouds that resemble cirrus clouds. I've watched jets spraying trails until the sky is completely covered horizon to horizon, even over the ocean, as far as I can see. What's funny is that when I see a small clearing in the spray, where I can see the sky, lo and behold, a jet comes through and sprays a new thick line through that clearing.

My suggestion to everyone is that you watch the sky every chance you get until you can judge easily for yourself. They seem to spray less during the Summer, so start watching now. You will notice all kinds of patterns like multiple parallel lines, tic tac toe, DNA (two jets flying parallel, one a slight distance behind the other, and they criss cross each other's path again and again!) and more. On more than one occasion I've even seem them spray a circle!

If you find a website that tells you contrails can last several minutes and even hours, then you know that you can not trust that website. They are spewing false science in an attempt to steer you away from concerning yourself with what they are doing in secret, right in front of you, in the sky.

I suggest you do more research to discover what particulates they are spraying. I can assure you that whatever it is, it's not good for us. Otherwise, why would they keep it a secret? After WWII, England admitted to spraying the population with all kinds of elements as experiments. In the '50s, the CIA used car exhaust, and subway ventilation systems to spray elements in NYC as experiments.

Watch the sky.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Engineer here. Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: ngineer here. Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: ngineer here. Posted by: uncleeddie
» RE: Engineer here. Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» Quacks on Ego Posted by: PointMan
» RE: ngineer here. Posted by: helenwheels
» Advice? Posted by: bornxeyed
» conversely Posted by: aislinnluv
» EncinoMuck rears his Ugly BS Posted by: PointMan
» EncinoMuck rears his Ugly BS Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: nha16
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: praedor
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: John Sawyer
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: liz_imp
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: peskyfly1
» RE: Airplane exhaust? Posted by: graemebacque
This is a conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids!!!
Posted by: kwalla on Jan 27, 2009 1:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't drink fluorinated water either!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Actually Posted by: Shey
Airplane Exhaust, you're wrong...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jan 27, 2009 1:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are INDEED contrails... when conditions are right, the ice crystals you mention act as seeding for any other moisture up there to condense around,,, some of these clouds that start as contrails can become quite extensive, covering the whole sky...

You should take a course in meteorology and learn about your planet's atmosphere and stop peddling this nonesense. Chemtrails indeed...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wow. Posted by: nha16
No information on anyone who sampled the trails?
Posted by: aouie01 on Jan 27, 2009 1:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there is so much concern, then hopefully sooner rather than later, someone will grab samples of the various trails and analyze it.
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sigh...
Posted by: profmarcus on Jan 27, 2009 1:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i am unbelievably tired of seeing every alternative explanation of the incredibly complex and frequently bizarre goings-on in this world labeled as "conspiracy theories"... that term is used disturbingly often to silence those that have the temerity to think "out of the box" rather than following the pre-digested, villager-approved explanations for the mess we find ourselves in... trying to find truth behind the spin, disinformation, ideological pablum, talking points, and hidden agendas of those who are our self-proclaimed arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable discussion has become like the search for the holy grail... i have been forced to adopt the mantra, "i believe everything and i believe nothing"...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED! Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED! Posted by: John Sawyer
» Small Box Posted by: Sparks56
....OF COURSE WE ARE POISONED
Posted by: Anthhh on Jan 27, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN MANY WAYS.

~~~Look at(listen to) the TV for one.

Where o where was the vigilant persons looking when the War Criminals were growing under our noses? when they successfully sat and plotted a massive attack on us ? The False Flag 9-11 Imperialist Plot ! Financial and political profiteers are STILL PLOTTING THESE THINGS!

WHO cares about another silly poison? There are SLEWS of them. NO DOUBT. OUR TAP WATER CONTAINS HIGH LEVELS OF QUICKLIME. DO you know that is there to reduce acidity of the water and reduce corrosion of the piping system. Keeping pipe costs low. This quicklime isnt very good for the acid balance of our stomachs, destroying our digestion capacity.

If they was going to poison us, we would have ZERO knoweldge and ZERO power to do anything. This talk gets us nowhere. Demand investigations.

We CAN choose to say the right things, and to ask the right questions to the right people. in the right manner.

... and change the fact of WHY does this shoe of abuse seem to fit? And we move forward from that standpoint (no puns intended)

Having that shoe of abused power fitting them is something we CAN do something about. To be vigilant and give discredit where discredit is due.

What outed mugger will attempt a mugging while being watched ? Instead he will be busy trying to achieve an "innocent" name for himself.
*hrmmmobamainstallationhrmmm*


By the way THERE ANOTHER 9-11 FALSE FLAG ATTACK planned for this year.

I believe that if enough people start talk about it, BEFORE it happens, it can be prevented.

Re:Analyses of Gaza attack aim Dear Representative of the website,
I wish to share another analyses of the attack upon the civilization of Gaza. I fear that the attack was deliberately made to be such a horrendous act. SO horrendous that it will be understandable for someone to be provoked to a violent revenge even upon the US innocent civilians . The world would easily believe the revenge was a true reveng and not a "False Flag" by a Imperialist plot for placing blame upon Middle Eastern Islamic militants. I fear that the US administration is planning to attack its own citizens again and place the blame upon t e r r o r i s m again, in another false flag operation. Also this is a high probability in veiw of the complete stage which is set. With a (false) "Good-Guy" President, US again becomes an "innocent" victim of the "barbaric" act. Then this "innocent" president expects and commands respect and following of the whole world as it proceeds to finish the genocides of The Islamic Middle Eastern civilizations as well as their benefactors This Barbaric t e r r o r i s m will allow the Occupations to escalate a hundredfold without any complaints. I believe that if enough people talk it may be prevented.

The president of Iran warned the president of Iraq of enemy plots and conspiracies against them on thursday. To be vigilant and give discredit where discredit is due

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ..I AM A STREET PROTESTER Posted by: Anthhh
» You said that last year Posted by: rickiey
That article was loaded with emotional flak
Posted by: whiteaglesoaring on Jan 27, 2009 3:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although the article was too heavily loaded with emotional flak to make a good propaganda lesson, it is satisfactorily over-loaded to make it a great spoof of how propaganda is contructed. This article is the equivalent of the Colonel Klink and Sergeant Schultz of the New World Order Ministry of "Truth".

You'll have to refine your use of emotional garbage so it isn't so laughable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inability to agree on the story--sure sign of a delusional belief system
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 27, 2009 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider this hypothesis:

The inability to agree on the story is a defining feature of a delusional belief system. People with alternate theories, such as chemtrails, tend to disagree radically with one another.

I'm not a political scientist or a sociologist, but there seems to be an obvious pattern here.

For example, right-wingers say man-made global warming is a hoax...but they disagree completely on what's really going on. Some say the globe is warming, but that it's not manmade. Others say it's cooling. Each global warming denier has his/her own crackpot explanation for what is going on. The only thing they agree on is that the scientists are wrong.

Ditto with the 9/11 Truth Movement, which holds that 9/11 was an "inside job." The Truthers say the government story is wrong...but then the agreement ends. In fact, virtually every 9/11 Truther in the world has a different theory--a fact you can verify by looking at a few Truther sites. They disagree on every aspect of the theory--from who did it to how they did it to why they did it. The only thing they agree on is that, somehow, the real experts are wrong.

You see what I mean. Delusional people can't achieve any kind of consensus on their beliefs. They reject the theories of qualified experts and go off and make up their own theories.

Sure enough, chemtrail believers have countless conflicting theories about what is being sprayed, by whom, and for what purpose. They fight with one another, attack one another, and call each other government agents constantly. It's really very funny.

PS: A foolish and silly clip by me, called World of Ick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Speak for yourself, Kool-Aid Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» Wrong Again EncinoMuck Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck Posted by: PointMan
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Wrong Again EncinoMuck Posted by: PointMan
» nope, see how you lie... Posted by: realtruther
» RE: nope, see how you lie... Posted by: EncinoM
More or less pointless, trying to argue/ educate those who have their mind made up on this
Posted by: Squarehead on Jan 27, 2009 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More or less pointless, trying to argue/ educate those who have their mind made up on this.

Weather? Temperature? Ice crystal formation? Illuminati? New World Order? Population cull?

You guys know it all.

Or maybe not. Dear Oh Dear.

There is a long history, in USA, of deluded theories of how the planet is run.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

people conspire all the time--it's a normal human activity which is sometimes beneficial
Posted by: Suzon on Jan 27, 2009 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but often detrimental because those with power have great resources and use them for protecting their interests and expanding their wealth and not for the general welfare.

How convenient to have invented the term "conspiracy theorists" to dismiss serious questions! But it's only a label, not an answer to anything.

There's an interesting chapter on contrails in The Cloudspotters Guide by Gavin Pretor-Pinney. The science is separate, however, from being concerned about and investigating the misuse of power by those who call the shots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A necessary link
Posted by: Praktik on Jan 27, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great story! I was hoping to see a link to what I think is the best contrail science link out there: http://contrailscience.com/

To all those who subscribe to "chemtrail theory" - all I can say is, test yourself!

Is your belief based on emotion, on what you would _like_ to believe? Or is it based on fact?

Look down the left of the link for different topics so you can learn about contrail formation and the myriad of ways they manifest. If you see a contrail going "on" and "off" - it isn't proof of a "chemtrail" button being pushed on and off, its due to the nature of the atmosphere:

"But it’s actually very simply. The amount of water in the exhaust is pretty constant, but the amount of moisture in the air is not. The humidity varies with altitude, and a layer of low humidity can be sandwiched between two layers of high humidity. As a plane climbs or descends through this layer, then the trail will only form in the areas of high humidity, and so look like it was “switched off” in the area of low humidity.

You can get the same effect with temperature. A warm layer of air can actually lay on top of a colder layer in what is called an “inversion” (you’ll hear this on the weather sometimes, referred to as an “inversion layer”). When a plane flies through this inversion layer, the trail can be “broken”.

It’s not just climbing or descending flights either. The boundaries between these layers is not flat, and gravity waves or rising convection currents of air can create large volume of air that differ in temperature and/or humidity from the neighboring air, and so can break (or make) the contrail when then plane flies through them.

Don’t take my word for it though. Do a Google search for “broken contrail” and you’ll find lots of examples, and similar explanations (Click the photos above for two)."

http://contrailscience.com/broken-contrails/

Don't let yourself be fooled - learn!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I was contacted by the author
Posted by: ad.johnson on Jan 27, 2009 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I am now glad he did not contact me further in this disappointing article.

As ever, there is a confusion between "theory" and "evidence".

Some good points are covered in the article, but these days I usually skip to the conclusion of the article, which in this case is woefully inadequate because of its dismissal of all the evidence.

Those who are parroting "contrails... contrails... contrails... CONTRAILS for heaven's sake" have not looked at all the evidence:

Grids
Triangles
Time lapse studies

This evidence is clear and unequivocal - as is the path of Hurricane Erin and its location on 9/11/01 (which I encouraged the author of this article to study, but I am not sure from this article if he did).

Here:

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/

For my report about chemtrails, and some of the responses I received about it:

http://tinyurl.com/chemrep

For a short film I made for BBCi:

http://tinyurl.com/bbcichems

So "contrail fantasists", what say you? It's funny how some people comfort themselves that it's just a contrail only phenomenon. It really is funny. I am sure they feel comforted with the author's conclusion too.

A reminder: just because the purpose of something cannot be clearly defined does not mean it does not exist.

Example: Fred says: "I don't know what human beings are for!!". Bill says: "Neither do I - so they can't exist, can they?"

PLEASE distinguish properly between "theory" "evidence" and "proof". Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Evidence of another Lame Article at Alternet
Posted by: Man_vs_Kleptocracy on Jan 27, 2009 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually it's just cheap propaganda that seems to be Alternet's stock in trade as an "alternative" to corporate MSM. What bargain basement irony.

Anybody that has bothered to look up now and then could never confuse the blanket, systematic crop dusting of the skies with "contrails" or any such ridiculous thing.

But not at the world according to this site. No sir. At Alternet 9/11 is just what the government says it is and so is the (mass thievery) Wall Street Bailouts along with that old "war on terror" thing.

No conspiracies here. It's just bloody business as usual.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IFR flightplans...AIRSPACE is always monitored
Posted by: gellero1 on Jan 27, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the brilliant posters here IGNORE THE FACT that all aircraft flying above 18,000 ft are tracked by THOUSANDS of flight controllers.

Military jets during training are in MOA's........outside they are controlled by ATC.

Anyone can go to a local airport and purchase airmaps that define federal airways.

Radar blips don't happen in IFR airspace without ATC seeing it.

Are air traffic controllers part of the 'conspiracy' too??

Knowledge and logic rule.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» interesting....but Posted by: gellero1
» You're insane. Posted by: Scientz
» RE: You're insane. Posted by: season
» RE: You're insane. Posted by: EncinoM
» Fine, SHE'S insane. Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Fine, SHE'S insane. Posted by: Shey
Finally some sanity!
Posted by: graemebacque on Jan 27, 2009 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you AlterNet for bringing some rationality to this situation!

It should be a requirement for environmental activists to do some studying of basic meteorology. This would go a long way toward dispelling this 'chemtrails' business and other 21st-century superstitions that literally cloud the very real and pressing issue of climate change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Finally some sanity! Posted by: mike1997
» baloney Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: baloney Posted by: Praktik
» Not one that lasts for hours Posted by: thornwolf
» RE: Not one that lasts for hours Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: Finally some sanity! Posted by: Shey
no inside job
Posted by: mike1997 on Jan 27, 2009 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is incontrovertible proof that the Bush admin had nothing whatsoever to do with the planning and implementation of the attacks on 9-11...it worked. If the Bushies had been in charge the planes would have missed the twoers and accedentally landed safely at JFK!

Now, was their response criminally stupid? Oh sure, everyone knows that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» no joke Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: no joke Posted by: Shey
» Anectdotal evidence dismissable Posted by: 2dogarage
» incontrovertible huh... Posted by: rafaeltoral
Secrecy breeds distrust
Posted by: katz22br on Jan 27, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the things our brains do constantly is the comparison of things, events and situations, in order to find similarities and correlations among them. So, if Caveman Kronk saw a lightning bolt strike a tree and burn it to ashes, he'll run for cover next time a big dark cloud approaches.

I agree that people sometimes come up with outlandish theories and beliefs for apparently mundane things, but this is NOT the case with the contrail/chemtrail suspicions. Those suspicions, unfortunately, are NOT completely unfounded.

The article doesnt mention it at all, but secret spraying tests over populated areas were actually done in many locations, inside and out of the United States. For decades. With real people, who were unaware of whatever was taking place. Real people who died or got sick because of those tests.

Please, don't take my words or those of any "conspiracy theorist nutjob" for it. Take the words of, say, an U.S. Senator. Here's a link:

billnelson.senate.gov/news/details.cfm?id=244626&

And here's an excerpt of what you'll see there:

"The land-based tests were done in five states -- including one near Yeehaw Junction, where a wheat fungus was sprayed -- and in the waters off Hawaii and California, as well as the United Kingdom and Canada. The purpose of the tests, which ran from 1962 to 1973, was to gauge the military's ability to cope with a biological or chemical attack.

Defense Department officials think most of the military personnel and civilians who might have been exposed were hit with only simulated versions of dangerous agents, or bacteria considered harmless to humans.

But outraged senators decried the decades-long policy of secrecy about the tests, and ordered the military to speed up the process of releasing information about Project 112 and any other similar programs."

(Bolds are mine.)

Interesting, huh? Wanna know more? Well, just some info about one out of many biowarfare programs is now declassified, but it certainly shows those tests were very real. Just Google for stuff like "Florida globigii spray", "Shady Grove", "Project SHAD", "tularensis marcescens spray tests", and so on.

There's a couple more links below. Some are official (Gov, Academia), some are not - but they are hardly the kind of material to be dismissed as "conspiracy theory" stuff:

fhp.osd.mil/CBexposures/pdfs/shady_grove_revised.pdf

books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11900&page=10

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5593/513a
(subscription needed)

coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/issue46/articles /history_of_biowarfare_in_usa.htm
(remove the space after "articles")

www.mindfully.org/Reform/Military-Germs-US-Cities.htm

So... now that we know for a fact that spraying tests over populated areas were really done by the government in the recent past, isn't it only logical to be at least suspicious of things that may look similar to that?

Careful with that cloud, Kronk!

k

p.s. for those who think "they" would never do that to their own country/voters: there is no dastardly deed that is too low for those seeking absolute power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

P.T. Barnum and the chemtrail people
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 27, 2009 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The great circus man P.T. Barnum is alleged to have said once: "There's a sucker born every minute".

Well applied to the chemtrail crowd, the fluoride crowd, the GM crop crazies, and all the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH Posted by: EncinoM
Contrails evaporate quickly, Chemtrails don't
Posted by: thornwolf on Jan 27, 2009 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I'm looking for is a scientific explanation of why chemtrails don't evaporate like contrails do. No one has offered that. Any scientists like to chime in on that?

I have my own theory. Contrails evaporate quickly because they are primarily composed of water vapor. Chemtrails do not evaporate quickly because they are primarily composed of something other than water vapor.

So what are they, really?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is part of a larger conspiracy...
Posted by: gnaw_bone on Jan 27, 2009 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to increase sales of foil hats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

96 chemtrails yesterday in my town
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is multi trillion $ global operation (146 countries). My sun is blotted out 4 days a week and spraying has increased since the $8.5 trillion bank heist.. At night when the atmosphere inverts i see massive particulate in the street lights even though i live on the gulf of Mexico with normally very clean air. THE SUNSETS AND SUNRISES LOOK SURREAL WITH FIRE RED ON ALL HORIZONS. The people who doubt are either paid shills or cowards. Watch my video on what the UN (GLOBAL 2000 CONFERENCE) has to do with this.. This is a CULL.

GO TO YOU TUBE ...AGENDA 21

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
So do something about it!
Posted by: marykmusic on Jan 27, 2009 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Contact me. We've been stopping chemtrails for years. Blue skies, smiling at me... nothing but blue skies do I see...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So do something about it! Posted by: marykmusic
» RE: So do something about it! Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
Jet engine exhaust??? As in pollution? Or propaganda???
Posted by: be marc on Jan 27, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you marginalize a huge group of thoughtful, observant adults? You refer to them as "conspiracy theorists", of course. Who would use a tactic like that? A propagandist.

Now we're to believe jet engines pollute far, far more today than they did twenty years ago? That the huge, miles-long hanging "contrails" those of us who live in rural areas observe crisscrossing the sky, on and way off the regular flight paths, are "normal" jet exhaust?

Nonsense.

Contrails are water vapor and dissipate quickly. They are not and never have been jetexhaust. The trails "conspiracy theorists" are referring to hang in the sky for a long, long time, resulting in a clear blue sky hazing over with "clouds", or something that looks like clouds.

Unlike the author, I don't claim to know what's going on. However, I do know the difference between contrails and chemtrails, and that chemtrails are not normal jet exhaust. Jet engines do not belch HUGE plumes of exhaust. This is clearly fiction. That these jets are belching huge plumes of something is observable fact.

This article is pure propaganda. Don't waste your time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YOU WILL WALK THE PLANK SELLOUT TROLL
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or do you prefer the stoning pit? I hate your ilk con mucho gusto

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm!
Posted by: bjandresen on Jan 27, 2009 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no theory about chemtrails, and had not heard about those theories mentioned in this article. However....... I live in a very small village in northern New Mexico, surrounded by lots of land. There are no major airports within miles, and very little air traffic. When the occasional aircraft flies over one can see a small vapor trail behind, that dissipates in seconds. Every now and then, however, the sky changes radically. Dozens of planes, at one time, will crisscross the sky leaving trails that linger and spread turning a beautiful, blue sky gray. I don't know what they are, but I don't feel they are normal flight patterns. There is no pattern to their appearance, and when this happens it is such a radical change from what one normally sees. I would like to see some real investigation. Air samples tested before the appearance of these aircraft and then again after.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmmm! Posted by: graemebacque
Greg Palast throws up in his mouth ...
Posted by: redbridge on Jan 27, 2009 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when he sees his article next/second to this piece of work.

If you are able to swallow the 9/11 Commission's report, you have no business writing in the progressive media. As a subscriber, I'm really disappointed to see Alternet once again label all of us with questions about 9/11 as 'conspiracy fanatics'.

How long until Joshua pegs those of us concerned that TARP is a waste of money as conspiracy fanatics?

If you're going to group different issues together in order to insult larger groups of your audience at one time, please send back my twenty. I haven't taken a stance on chemtrails, but your position certainly piques my curiosity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A simple question
Posted by: RickW on Jan 27, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why in the days immediately before 911, were most planes flying at about half the usual height of about 30,000 ft.? After 911, they resumed their usual height.............

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A simple question Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: A simple question Posted by: marykmusic
» RE: A simple question Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: A simple question Posted by: RickW
A Real Contrail Issue
Posted by: PaulK on Jan 27, 2009 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if passenger jet contrails were a real source of global warming in at least two ways? What if more regulation of the airline industry were a partial cure?

(Someone call an EMT, because Southwest Airlines is choking on a little bag of pretzels as I write this!)

We know that long-lasting contrails on humid days reflect sunlight back into space, but that short-lasting contrails on dry days disappear into water vapor, which acts as a greenhouse gas. So the airlines are real polar bear killers!

The strong greenhouse effect solution would be for airlines to not fly in the upper atmosphere on dry days. That way they wouldn't pollute to the detriment of the rest of us. Keep at least half of the planes down on the ground on such days. The chi-chi passengers could still get to Chicago every day, and many others could take more environmentally benign transportation modes, might wait a day, or might not travel at all.

This proposal affects profits! The airlines will absolutely hate the idea. So will Disney World with all its faux green exhibits and energy hog roller coasters. But what's wrong with the proposal? It's a compromise. The uncompromising alternative is to not fly jets at all.

Down the road (translation, Boeing wouldn't work on environmental issues for 100 years if we let them off, they'd wait until their polluting company was as dead as GM or Chrysler, then go cry for a national bailout) we need jets or prop planes that don't dispense so much water vapor into the atmosphere or that don't fly as high.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My definition of Hell...
Posted by: bizeeb on Jan 27, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..is a cocktail party thrown and attended by 9/11-truthers. These people are so annoying it's almost unbelievable; the worst part is that they (you?) try to dress it up as being reasonable and skeptical and logical, instead of just nutty and paranoid. And of course, anyone who thinks 9/11 was actually carried out by Muslim terrorists is a naive, kool-aid sipping, fool. Get a life idiots!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My definition of Hell... Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: My definition of Hell... Posted by: helenwheels
Missing the point
Posted by: Zimbly on Jan 27, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether( weather haha).... whether these so called "Chem Trails: are based on fact or fiction is missing the real point.

The real point is "PEOPLE NO LONGER TRUST THEIR GOVERNMENT" and fear(and quite rightly so) that their Government or more correctly the Pentagon are trying out some weird experiments on their own people. The fact remains that there exists a huge "disconnect" from the Pentagon and the People, the mistrust goes very deep. Thats the point.
Arguing about whether this has basis in so called reality is idiotic.

Now the argument goes..'TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT THEY HAVE YOUR BEST INTERESTS AT HEART"...yeah right..when Hell freezes over.

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
This is what we have seen, especially with the Bush Administration.
This article is suggesting that the public mistrust is just about "kooks believing in Chem trails"...... the fear and mistrust goes way deeper than that.....and won't go away because some clown writes a clever piece of propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waiting For the Real 'Truth'
Posted by: Marshalldoc on Jan 27, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boy! I can't wait for Fox[NOT]News & Bill O'Reilly to tell me the "real truth" about this existential threat to god, mother, apple pie, and all we hold dear in these her United States...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: It may be real and not a 'conspiracy of evil' at the same time.
Posted by: helenwheels on Jan 27, 2009 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like you, I have thought about these a lot, as I see them nearly every day now. I would like to know if it is something that is being done to combat global warming or somesuch.

It's not necessarily that what is being done is bad, but when you don't tell people, they are naturally going to suspect something's up.

I want to know why they do it and what risk it poses to the health of living creatures, if any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: It may be real and not a 'conspiracy of evil' at the same time. you nailed it. And Bush won
Posted by: Beck on Jan 29, 2009 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're afraid of everything, all the time now. He wanted to create an atmosphere of fear (no pun intended) and he did. You're right that if they really want to kill alot of us, this seems the slowest, most ineffective, unreliable way, and how do they keep these chemicals from themselves and their families? They can't. You're absolutely right that this could be real and yet still not a conspiracy or even a conspiracy of anything like trying to kill huge numbers of people.

It seems sad that we're so much more afraid than we used to be, afraid of those in power and of what we see, if we think it's unusual. I asked my husband alot of questions about contrails last night, because he's the only person I know who has flown so many years. he's puzzled at the alarm over certain patterns, the criss-crossing grids. He was very matter-of-fact, there are more planes, those are planes flying at different altitudes, to different places, so of course the trails cross. He said that not all altitudes will result in contrails, and that flying along even at a steady altitude you will sometimes leave them and sometimes not. Military flyers have a special interest in contrails; they give you away. He also said that military planes do 180 turns. Anyone who didn't know this could certainly be puzzled observing it, especially if it's a tanker up doing refueling exercises and flying in a race-track oval for a long time.

Yes, open-minded, skeptical, but not eager to see the worst, or dismiss everything. If we're afraid of everything, or just afraid of too much, Bush can really say Mission Accomplished. It keeps Republican thinking in power even when Republicans aren't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

star gazer
Posted by: Birdland on Jan 27, 2009 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watch the sky more often than most people. I see these contrails, and chemtrails, whatever you want to call them. The difference is astonishing between contrails and so called chemtrails. Actual contrails from commercial flights, (I know what causes them) are very different from the subject chemtrails. I don't know what they are but tell me one thing; Why do the chemtrail planes fly away from commercial flight paths, why do they make grids, circles, dots and dashes, and X's, and why do they spread out with a rainbow colored haze destroying the days when the sky is clear blue and the sun is out? Even as the commercial craft vapors disappear shortly, similar altitudes and weather conditions. And air traffic is way down over the past five years. With airlines failing, flights cancelled, and consolidation of other flights to pack each plane. Air traffic is down at our airport, but contrail numbers are the same or increasing. There is virtually no air traffic at night from our commercial airport, yet I can see chemtrails being made back and forth in the sky. I'm not a wild, wacky, conspiracy type, and noticed these "chemtrails" long before this became a worldwide topic. I'm convinced they are not normal commercial air traffic. And I'd like to know what they are soon. On days when there is heavy chemtrail action, I go in the house. This article is nothing but an opinion of the writer and it's apparent that he is trying to discredit all those who see and notice the difference between contrails and chemtrails. Why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: star gazer Posted by: helenwheels
Why is it a "conspiracy" when it's right in front of your face?
Posted by: helenwheels on Jan 27, 2009 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why won't the government just tell us what the hell chemtrails are? I've taken movies and pics, and some go from the ground straight vertically up! NO JETS FLY in that pattern. Sometimes, you even see the "black line" phenomenon. I've seen that twice... where the chemtrail casts a sort of shadow under it. Once driving from Calabasas to Los Angeles. It's quite freaky and completely unnatural.

It's so bad in LA some days that a once-blue sky is white by the end of the day, all without any clouds. I can literally watch these trails come out of the planes (that are so high up you can barely see them), sit there and spread out for hours.

I'm sorry but that was NOT going on 15 years ago.

Unlike many so-called "conspiracy theorists," I don't claim to know what their purpose are. I'd like to think it's actually some plan to combat global warming, or something to that effect. However, to deny it's going on is completely batshit crazy. All you have to do is look up.

And it does go on world-wide because I was on a message board once and they posted pics from I think Norway. Apparently it goes on everywhere, and NOT just major metropolitan areas.

It's crazy to me that more people don't notice it. It's right in front of your face. Watch a jet fly from the airport. The contrail dissipates in a couple of minutes, if even that long. Then, watch one of those streaks go across the sky and spread out for HOURS.

WHY?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conspiracy Theory = Power Unfriendly Theory.
Posted by: lugoteehalt on Jan 27, 2009 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know bog all about con trails, but here's an important point about conspiracy theories in general.

Power can't train us from birth explicitly to avoid power unfriendly theories; so it has to come up with a cryptic method of doing the same thing: It tells us to adjure paranoid theories and conspiracy theories because 98 times out of a hundred these are power unfriendly.

Try it: Think of a non-paranoid theory of something, say 911, then think of a paranoid one. Which is the least power friendly?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DENY THIS! -->
Posted by: bbruhwiler8 on Jan 27, 2009 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: DENY THIS! --> Posted by: EncinoM
Alexander Zaitchik does not have his head on straight
Posted by: FDISK on Jan 27, 2009 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before adding to conspiracy theories as just that, it is a shame he hasn't done ANY research into them...Like aliens, crop circles, chemtrails, etc.
Maybe he should go to Google - more - video and do a search for The Disclosure Project Briefing and watch what 21 former US Govt. workers had to say (they were from the Army, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard, Air Force, CIA, NSA, DOD, NRO, FBI and FEMA) about UFOs and other related issues. Or how bout he also watch Evidence The Case For NASA UFOS and see what NASA lies about...
As far as chemtrails has he EVER seriously looked at the skies in the last 21 years...give me a break, contrails my butt. Contrails go away in minutes these lines that expand don't for days.
Maybe he should go to www.carnicom.com and READ all the REAL evidence..
There are conspiracy theories of course but Kennedy was murdered and William F. Colby (former CIA Director) was found floating down the Potomac....I could go on and on with EVIDENCE instead of just spouting the words conspiracy theory, get it Mr. Alexander Zaitchik???????
Your obviously just trying to sell stories isn't that your job? LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conspiracy Bonanza
Posted by: cbishopp on Jan 27, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The delight about a conspiracy theory (or any theory by definition) is that it has yet to be proven true OR false. Once the conspiracy theories come out though, there are often an army of nuts and naysayers who will dilute the important information.
I personally have no idea if there are government programs designed to spray toxins on the general public, this is the first I have heard of it. I DO know that the CIA performed tests in the 60's in San Francisco where innocent civilians were unknowingly dosed with LSD so they could study the effects. This experiment was documented and information about this was released many years after the fact. At the time I am sure many people thought this to be a ridiculous rumor as well. But it happened, a purely idiotic, government funded conspiracy to perform experiments on an ignorant civilian population.
This one event does not imply that all conspiracy theories are correct, far from it, but it should indicate that this kind of behavior is possible and has occurred on many occasions.
I am not the person to tell you that there are aliens watching us or secret government programs behind every locked door, but I do believe the human heart is capable of anything. Any form of deceit, murder, torture, or enslavement that you can imagine is happening right now all over the world. There are crazy people out there and not all of them are poor vagrants on street corners or foreign dictators, some are in corner offices on the top floor of banks or government offices in the Pentagon.
You don't have to believe in conspiracy theories but if you don't realize that mass torture exists or that money is manipulated for the benefit of the few or that population control as an issue is studied by governments and think tanks all over the world or that media is not controlled from the top down, well I am not sure what to tell you.

Those who are in a position to really affect the world around them, whether through personal drive or wealth, believe they are as just and right as everybody else.
I guess we will sit back and hope they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aluminum Overcast
Posted by: Bizatch! on Jan 27, 2009 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a fetching illustration for the lead story today! The design department at Alternet certainly can't be accused of subtlety. Even though chemtrails are an odd thing to believe in, the skepticism on display in this dismissive article is more worrying than the basic questions being asked by some chemtrail investigators.

I put my own feelings on hold after reaching a dead end with many of the observations on offer concerning this phenomenon... I don't totally follow Scott Steven's line of questioning, for instance, nor can I accept the depopulation scenario... and yet, the fact remains: these streaks in the skies are present some days more than others, and the strange patterns which don't conform to regular flight paths (know your local air routes!) are very intriguing to me.

Zaitchik should follow his own smug advice: watching the skies for any length of time on a clear 'spray day' will assuredly NOT reveal fluffy bunnies or sprawling dragons. These lines in the sky, for whatever reason, turn into odd smudges that last for hours and spread out in ways that normal contrails never have in the history of physics. I have been watching the skies for years after following up on a buddy's 'conspiracy theory', and I overcame initial suspicions enough to believe that something bizarre is taking place up there.

If nothing else, what I learned about HAARP or other military secrets which have been recently revealed can be credited to acknowledging the mystery of chemtrails. I will not be surprised to see an expose of this covert operation appear in a few year's time. I can't venture a guess as to what is going on at present, but I've learned to keep an open mind about this phenomenon. I call it 'speculating', not 'conspiracy theories'!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best way to cover up a real conspiracy
Posted by: sausage on Jan 27, 2009 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best way I can think of to cover up a real conspiracy is to trot out some goofball or other with a totally outlandish and off the wall conspiracy theory; give him and his small band of cultish followers, if he has any, some face-time on TV and air time on radio just to lend him an air of respectability; then round up some academics to dissect and ultimately discredit the wacko's grand conspiracy theory; meanwhile the real conspiracy, which is not as far fetched or far reaching as the wacko's theory would lead one to believe, is effectively buried.

So why are we discussing contrails, or rather "Chemtrails"?

Because jet contrails do effect weather, hence climate. In fact a 2000 Environmental Protection Agency fact sheet unequivocally states in it summery:Contrails are composed primarily of water (in the form of ice crystals) and do not pose health risks to humans. They do affect the cloudiness of the Earth’s atmosphere, however, and therefore might affect atmospheric temperature and climate (emphasis added)."

So what might the real conspiracy behind this "chemtrails" conspiracy?

Most contrails in the continental United States come from domestic jet airliners. If the Obama administration, or any future administration, decides to do something to eliminate or, at the very least, slow contrail formation, then goodbye airline industry as we now know it. At least that must be the fears of airline executives.

So by surreptitiously promoting these "chemtrail" nutcases the airline industry is off the hook vis-a-vis climate change. Once the "chemtrail" conspiracy is thoroughly discredited and debunked, airline executives can tell the public, "See, our contrails are nothing more than happy little rain-cloud makers. So when you look up into the sky, that's not the hot exhaust of a jet engine you see. That's a baby rainbow." Or some such nonsense.

Then it's back to business as usual without the bad old EPA breathing down the airline industry's neck thanks to some nice men in Congress. While the rest of us rest assured that those contrails overhead in no way contribute to the degradation of our worldwide climate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANewEarthNow
Posted by: artcalight on Jan 27, 2009 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one who has greatly benefited from Reichian psychoanalysis practiced by a very experienced therapist in order to address the fallout from multiple trauma, I also object to this article, especially the lumping of Wilhelm Reich with "discredited" theories. Considering the immoral, greedy, disgusting behavior being revealed daily on a mass scale in connection with the economic meltdown globally, I put nothing beyond the imagination and means of the military-industrial-Big Pharma hegemony.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

alternet 5 stars
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Alternet for posting an article that should be on the front page of every newspaper and magazine on the planet. Chemtrails are an attack on us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: alternet 5 stars Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: alternet 5 stars Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: alternet 5 stars Posted by: EncinoM
title
Posted by: DavidR on Jan 27, 2009 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we allocate ~$720 million to iraq each day, but we cant spare half that to feed people? you people are robots. WTC7, big pharma, big media, big oil, Mk ultra, project paperclip, iraq, gaza. we are hypnotized and distracted. especially YOUth who masturbate to themselves and their egos hourly with things like facebook. this system is blatantly a lie and we accept it because we believe it to be outside ourselves and our control, so we do nothing but shift the blame of the current piece of shit world we live in on its "complexity". we will need a swift kick in the nuts in order to wake us up. and this will happen within 5 years. quote me bitch.
an eloquent 'down to earth' black man toting a supposed bag of goodies soothes minds of the masses of self-defined progressivists. the future is still grim people. we are all conditioned robots to some extent. YOU are too distracted to realize these things because YOU apparently have chosen the right opinions and life philosophies to lull yourself into your current state of complacency and 'security' and away from the other 85% of the world that lives in shit because of the MONEY SYSTEM that YOU support everyday. money has become god. it is what we strive and long for and what we need for survival. thats why it will slowly be taken away from you. (:
http://patriotsquestion911.com
you likely group all 'conspiracies' and those that research them in the same bag, and you attach all your preconceived notions (or should i say those of others that you've taken on as your own) as a subtly self-deceitful (maybe even sub-conscious) means of reassuring yourself that this world is just fine and that those that challenge this notion are all loonies.
as for chemtrails i have no idea. all i know is that we are ALL guilty for doing nothing to end war and poverty and to remove from power those that have manipulated from behind the scenes. really people we could figure it out. we just choose not to.
prove me wrong you fucking robot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
dont drink the tap water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global dimming
Posted by: linecrosser on Jan 27, 2009 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chemical or not contrails are changing the world as we know it. PBS has a documentary explaining the process, how it was discovered, and what it means for the future. To ignore this or any other conspiracy theory is OK since they are distractions from the greatest imminent threat. Everything is a conspiracy, from the manufacturer to the advertiser, using all forms of the media to get the masses to but a product or believe an ideal. Lobbying congress, to pass laws that transfer the wealth of the many to the benefit of the few, is a conspiracy. Mr. Zaitchik touched on the imminent global disaster when he mentioned the Illuminati and the New World Order. Why the Bilderberg Group, the Central Banking system, Council On Foreign Relations ect., ect. were left out, I don't know. Well, maybe the author was concentrating on Chemtrails and I'm rambling about the Geopolitical atmosphere, because thats what is going to kill us off decades before pollution of any kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Global dimming Posted by: kellysgarden
9/11
Posted by: Juven on Jan 27, 2009 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So this writer thinks that people that demand the truth on 911 are just paranoid conspiracy theorists? What a stooge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 9/11 Posted by: willymack
Chemtrails by Beck - great song
Posted by: greenferret on Jan 27, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chemtrails is also the name of a great song by Beck on the album "Modern Guilt".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The TRUTH is bad enough
Posted by: willymack on Jan 27, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without some hysterical twit bleating "the sky is falling!" It's what you DON'T see that's killing us, and that's CO2, carbon dioxide, you know the stuff that makes the bubbles in soda and beer, THAT harmless stuff, except it's far from harmless, especially in the vast quantities we're artifically putting into our atmosphere every minute of every day. In my opinion, the two most deadly threats to our "civilized" way of life are archaic thinking which allows our population to explode while ignoring its obvious implications, and ignoring the CO2 time bomb, which science assures us could soon cause massive flooding of places such as Bangladesh, New York, and Florida, to name a few. The flooding is minor compared to severe climate changes, massive famine, and deadly social upheaval, as a result of competition for depleted resources. These dire possibilities are predicted by people who are highly educated and trained in their respective disciplines, and who KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT. Who do YOU believe? Scientists who have our best interests in mind, oil and coal crooks, or hysterical Chicken Littles?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Jan 27, 2009 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're all gonna die!

Calm down people.

Whether it is from chemtrails or fluoride in the water or Osama Bin Laden sticking a nuke up our ass, death a destruction is just around the corner!

Actually, the major causes of death are: eating too much, smoking too much, sitting on your ass too much, car wrecks, that sort of thing.

Do any of you walk around paranoid of french fries and volkswagens? Well, why NOT?

Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we will all die! Perhaps the universe will be better off for it.

Are any of you people happy? How un-fun to be afraid all the damn time.

Life sucks and then you die. So f****** what?

Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!

Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember Global Warming Offhand DIsmissals?
Posted by: ronerer on Jan 27, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author uses mockery and verbal abuse of the subject issue as well as government sources as factual evidence against the topic’s theory. Other than an aggressive article in disagreement with the topic there is no allowance for support of the issue aside from the US Government and Armed Forces – people who “know better” it would seem.
Consider the offhand dismissal of global warming during the late 1990’s. Can one imagine such an offhand dismissal of the subject at this date? It is my opinion that Americans and the worldwide internet audience do not need to endure such offhand mockery of what many consider to be of great importance from a news-source such as Alter Net. The world has suffered much from the offhand mockery of immensely important issues from the shrill pundits of the corporate right.
One should ask for a better quality of reporting and from Alter Net contributors.
The amount of aerosol material pumped into the atmosphere by each jet aircraft is immense and should be of concern in that subject alone.
The additional issues surrounding this subject are that the jet-engine aerosol consists of various nano-particles, heavy metals and potentially lethal chemicals; scientifically documented and linked with URL’s on any of the websites so quickly dismissed by the author.
This issue will not go away even with the type of shrill offhand dismissal exhibited by the author. Thank goodness the topic of Global Warming has not suffered the fate of such offhand dismissals.
Why does Alter Net choose to publish an offhand dismissal of this issue of great importance to millions of people around the world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great post... thanks Posted by: Prophit
Chicken Little
Posted by: jgilb on Jan 27, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are a interesting species. Evolved enough to help better ourselves and live in a safer world.

Yet, we seem to have a need to be frightened. Even if it's not true, we make shit up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's amazing how dead certain some journalists can be about something
Posted by: Richard House on Jan 27, 2009 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The man who wrote this article, Alexander Zaitchik, may be right but he sounds naive nevertheless. His certainty is just as fantastical as the conspiracy theorists he mocks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edward Teller/Founder of H Bomb/Chem Trails
Posted by: LetsSaveDemocracy on Jan 27, 2009 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an extraordinary article that shows clearly how Alternet is an agency of propaganda, and a poor one. this article that attempts to debunk chemtrails is missing the most important piece.

i used think that chemtrails were just a paranoid suspicion. i used to scoff at 9/11 truth activists too. until i bothered to get informed in an intelligent and thorough way.

here is an article by the kindly founder of the H Bomb and his speculations about how to avert the effects of global warming. We can a) reduce consumption or b) try this cockamamie plan to scatter throughout the atmosphere aluminum oxide crystals to reflect sunlight back to where it came from. I wonder what one they tried. Anyone who can't see that 9/11 was an inside job, and that there are clearly very suspcious patterns caused frequently by non commercial jets, is not playing with a full deck. they are victims of propaganda, or other psychological conditions which prevent them from seeing something that overwhelms them. i won't pretend to know exactly what chem trails are but it is obviously a real phenomenon and the journalist who wrote this piece is not a real or competent investigator.

but most impressive to me is the quality of the responses to this and other (particularly 9/11 related) propaganda. Alternet should be boycotted. do you think we can orchetrate one from the comments section?

All he had to do was google Edward Teller Chemtrails.

i can't post the link because it is too long a word.

debunk that, dumbshit!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHEMTRILS ARE ONLY PART OF IT
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 27, 2009 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE SELF APPOINTED MASTERS OF THE PEASANTS, THE INTELLECTUAL (INBRED INSANE) BLOODLINES, HAVE PLANNED TO KILL OFF OVER 4/5ths OF THE WORLDS POPULATION SINCE THE EARLY 1870s. THIS PLAN BEGAN WITH THE BRITISH WHEN THEY HAD THEIR ADVISORS LOOK INTO THE FUTURE AND WERE TOLD THAT THEY WOULD LOSE THEIR CONTROL OVER THE PLANET IF THEY DID NOT BEGIN CULLING THE....HEARD (US!)!
THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON MASS EXTERMINATION EVER SINCE. THEY HAVE TRIED ALMOST EVERYTHING THAT THEY COULD THINK OF; WARS, POISONING FOOD AND WATER AND MEDICINES, DEBT, SPRAYING TOXINS, EUGENICS PROGRAMS, MANUFACTURING KILLING DISEASES IN LABS AND SPREADING THEM THROUGH TAX EXEMPT 'HUMANITARIAN' ORGANIZATIONS, MERCURY IN VACCINES, FISH TOOTH FILLINGS, LEAD IN TIN CAN LINERS, PAINT GASOLINE, TOXIC FLUORIDE IN WATER SUPPLIES TOOTHPASTES, GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS, TOXIC SUGAR SUBSTITUTES, BISPHENOL-A ADDED TO PLASTIC FOOD CONTAINERS, INJECTING RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES DIRECTLY INTO UNSUSPECTING PATIENTS IN HOSPITALS, DEVELOPING RACE SPECIFIC BIO-WEAPONS, SHUTTING DOWN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FIGHTING INFECTIONS, DRASTICALLY REDUCING SOCIAL AID PROGRAMS, INCREASING HEALTH CARE COSTS TO UNAFFORDABLE, INCREASING THE COST OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MASS MEDIA PROPAGANDA BRAIN WASHING, KIDNAPPING CHILDREN (OVER 1 MILLION KIDS GO MISSING IN THE U.S. ALONE EVERY YEAR), 3rd WORLD SLAVE STATES, FORCED PLANNED PARENTHOOD, LAND MINES MADE TO APPEAR TO BE TOYS, 'DIRTY' AMMUNITION MADE WITH DEPLETED URANIUM, SECRET DEVELOPMENT OF 'FAST ACTING' CANCERS, OFFICIAL DIET RECOMENDATIONS DESIGNED TO KILL, HAARP, DELAY OF NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AID, ISOLATION OF COUNTRIES FROM FOOD SOURCES (PLANNED STARVATION), PLANNED RELIGIOUS AND IDIOLOGICAL CONFLICTS, THOUSANDS OF EXTERMINATION CAMPS, NEUTRALIZATION OR ASSASINATION OF ANY LEADER PROPOSING LOVE AND PEACE, SETTING UP CENTRAL BANKS TO DEPRIVE THE MASSES OF ANY VALUE BASED ECONOMY, PROMOTING MENTAL WELLNESS THROUGH PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, SETTING UP PRIVATELY OWNED PRISONS FOR PROFIT, SCHOOLING OUR POLICE AND MILITARY TO SHOW NO MERCY TOWARD THE PEOPLE, DEVELOPING LASER, SOUND AND MICROWAVE WEAPONS TO BE USED AGAINST THE GENERAL POPULATION, EXEMPTING THEMSELVES FROM THE LAW, TAXING THE LOWER CLASSES TO SUPPORT THE ULTRA-WEALTHY, RESISTING ALL SAFETY STANDARDS IN INDUSTRY, INCREASING ALLOWABLE TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASES BY INDUSTRY, BRIBING OR BLACKMAILING GOVERNMENT AND RELIGOUS LEADERS TO BE SHILLS FOR THEIR CULLING AGENDA, POISONING BABY FOOD PRODUCTS, RUNNING THE WORLDS ILLICIT DRUG TRADES SUCH AS POT, HEROIN, OPIUM AND COCAINE AND, OF COURSE, MASS GENOCIDE.

DIET INJECTIONS AND INJUNCTIONS WILL COMBINE FROM A VERY EARLY AGE TO PRODUCE THE SORT OF CHARACTER AND THE SORT OF BELIEFS THAT THE AUTHORITIES CONSIDER DESIRABLE AND ANY SERIOUS CRITICISM OF THE POWERS THAT BE WILL BECOME PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

-BERTRAN RUSSELL
(THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON HUMANITY)

CHINA WAS ABLE TO TURN THE CORNER AND BECOME THE LEADING WORLD SUPER POWER BECAUSE THEY HAVE A POLICE STATE AND THEY ARE ABLE TO FORCE PEOPLE TO STOP REPRODUCING.

-DR. ERIC R. BIANKA

ALTHOUGH THE ARISTOCRACY HAVE MURDERED MANY BILLIONS, THEIR ADVISORS (THE BILDERBURGERS, CLUB OF ROME AND THE ROTHSCHILDS CENTRAL BANKING GROUP), HAVE TOLD THE BLOODLINE ELITE THAT THE METHODS USED THUS FAR HAVE FAILED TO KILL AS MANY HUMANS AS THEY WOULD LIKE.
WORRIED ABOUT A MASS WORLDWIDE PEASANT REVOLUTION DUE TO ENHANCED COMMUNICATION AND TRAVEL, THEY HAVE SET UP A NEW PROGRAM OR PLAN TO EXTERMINATE MOST OF THE WORLDS POPULATION - FORCE - A WORLDWIDE POLICE TERROR STATE.

IT IS TIME FOR YOUR SHEPHERDS TO BRING THE SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE. THEY HAVE BEEN HIRING RUTHLESS, USUALLY CRIMINAL MENTAL DEFICIENTS, MERCENARY SOLDIERS (THUGS) TO HEARD YOU, BEAT AND TORTURE YOU, ENSLAVE YOU AND KILL YOU WHILE STEALING YOUR PROPERTY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: i cut and pasted it Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» It's Bertran(d) Russell Posted by: bizeeb
» i call em like i see em ..troll Posted by: HANGTRAITORS
» RE: CHEMTRILS ARE ONLY PART OF IT Posted by: graemebacque
ANOTHER FALSE FLAG 9-11 ATTACK
Posted by: Anthhh on Jan 27, 2009 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

“... a group running affairs in the US from behind the stage aims to dominate the Middle East fully. So, one should not be ignorant of enemy conspiracies and plots,”

-President Ahmadinejad told visiting Iraqi National Security Advisor Muvafaq al-Rubai on Thursday.


The HCGRA Threat Level is RED right now. (Homeland Citizens against "Groups Running Affairs")

The STAGE IS SET.
A FEW FACTORS INCLUDE:
-no one was held acountable for the obvious crimes involved in the 9-11 false flag..

-no one is recognizing the crimes against the
ISLAMIC CIVILIZATIONS of AFGHANISTAN IRAQ PALESTINE.

-no one is recognizing their rights.

-no one plans to apologize.

-no one plans to try to make compensation for their crimes and "mistakes"

-no one plans to reform the structure of the UNSC which will allow and encourage the NEXT FAKE ATTACK.

No...No one stops the cycle.
It is only a matter of time.
The plotters have now made America appear innocent with OBAMA.
Now they are going to FALSE-FLAG ATTACK US AGAIN. THIS YEAR.

IRAQ IS STARTING TO SHAKE HERSELF OFF.
SHE WILL BE FRAMED AGAIN THIS YEAR.
OBAMA will "righteously" complete the grip on IRAQ, through conspiracy and plots such as 9-11.

SPEAK UP NOW.
THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We all know, but ignore the real reason for chemtrails...
Posted by: buddyedgewood on Jan 27, 2009 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...MIND CONTROL! Religion is losing it's grip on the populous. So, to keep us "in line", the man behind the curtain is spraying us with mind controlling drugs!

They spray us and then further program us through TV, gaming and Internet porn. This is to keep us docile and compliant - just like cattle and sheep.

Why would they want to depopulate the planet? That would only hurt tax revenues, which are used to corral and control the populous that doesn't have or watch TV or have access to the Internet.

Come on people! Wake up from your chemically induced coma! It's COMMON SENSE! Obama is in on it too, otherwise he would never have been President!

;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What kind of pompous ass is this Alexander Zaitchik?
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jan 27, 2009 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He says "Like most conspiracies, there are grains of truth in its basic components. The planet is under attack. The climate is undergoing drastic changes. Governments do lie. Pollution is causing more and more respiratory illness. The military does have secret weapons programs, some of them involving high-frequency weapons and weather modification."

He goes on to tell us to lie down in the grass, look up at the sky and enjoy life.

Is that supposed to be helpful or enlightening?

One of my senators, Kay Bailey Hutchison, introduced weather modification research legislation, s. 1807, but I'm not sure what became of it. There has been other weather modification legislation too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having worked for a federal agency let me tell you...
Posted by: sausage on Jan 27, 2009 12:53 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It never ceases to amaze the number of seemingly intelligent people who subscribe to one or another nefarious grand governmental conspiracy or other.

Having worked in a federal agency let me tell you, the permanent agencies of United States government couldn't put together a conspiracy worth its name if they had to. What conspiracy theorists don't understand is that the federal bureaucracy is made up of hundreds, maybe thousands of individual agencies, staffs and bureaus all fighting for a piece of the federal budget. They only conspire against themselves.

So keep it up conspiracy nuts! While you go chasing after black helicopters and "chemtrails" the real conspiracies are being concocted in Wall Street and main street by your locally elected officials to sell off, piecemeal, public assets to private corporate interests who have no interest in promoting the general welfare.

Yep, all you conspiracy nuts are doing is providing cover for the real villains of this set piece, corporate America and its goal of monetary world domination through globalization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Put down the crank pipe... Posted by: sausage
Chemtrails
Posted by: Amerikagulag on Jan 27, 2009 12:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I've been watching these "chemtrails" for well over a decade, I find this article goes a long way to feed into the naive notion the "nothing is going on in the skies besides commercial traffic".

You've lost your credibility with this article as far as i'm concerned. Without actually investigation, or using any time based research, simply publishing a couple of 'opinions' doesn't put the issue to rest.

Jet CONTRAILS consist of ice crystals. Ice is HEAVIER than air and will dissipate and fall, whereas these 'plumes' remain airborne and SPREAD exponentially.

The fact that a democrat is in office doesn't make everything ok.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chemtrails Posted by: helenwheels
» Hmmm, where do you live??? Posted by: Prophit
Oh Dear......
Posted by: zelda253 on Jan 27, 2009 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry. You make me laugh. You have no idea how ridiculous you reveal yourself to be with your smug little article. No wonder it is so easy to manipulate the masses, the mediocre minds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conspiracies
Posted by: Amerikagulag on Jan 27, 2009 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would also remind you that when you call you wife on the phone and sak "what's for dinner" and she says, "Spaghetti", and you say, "Okay", it's a CONSPIRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chemtrails
Posted by: Amerikagulag on Jan 27, 2009 1:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, having watched these for over a decade, I have personally witnessed 4 - 180' U-TURNS by these aircraft. 4 times I've seen this.

....yeah, I know, the pilot forgot his keys and had to turn back.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chemtrails Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Chemtrails Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Chemtrails Posted by: rockpicker
» RE: Chemtrails Posted by: graemebacque
The function of "conspiracy theories"
Posted by: chorton on Jan 27, 2009 1:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First our economic leaders, with the connivance of the government, have unquestionably been poisoning us, poisoning the atmosphere and (on the scale of human lifetimes) irreversibly changing the climate in ways that will result in a decreased capacity of the Earth to support human populations. This is science, not speculation. It is easier to see that as a conspiracy, which could be explained in terms of bad people who might be exposed and stopped, than as the outcome of the workings of the system on which we all depend, and it serves the interests of those who profit from that system to distract us with these theories.

Second, it is easy to believe in conspiracies when the whole government functions as an ongoing conspiracy, controlled by a relatively small cabal of super-rich families who manipulate it and the news we get about it to support their activities and preserve their wealth and power. That again is supportable by scientific analysis, although you wouldn't know it from reading the Springfield Republican or watching Fox News. And again, the wingnut conspiracy theorists serve their interests by distracting the public from the real conspiracies, such as the one to start a war in Iraq (now exposed) or with Iran (on hold).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It seems to be increasingly apparent
Posted by: helenwheels on Jan 27, 2009 2:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That if you investigate anything that appears strange, or if you disagree with what the corporate-owned MSM reports, or if you are intellectually curious and just don't buy the very crazy (actually) "traditional" beliefs, then you are a conspiracy theorist.

I just want to know what they are spraying, because they are. You can see jets leaving contrails and it's not even close to the same thing. Contrails don't spread out for hours and cover the sky. At least they didn't 15 years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

chemtrails are NOT contrails
Posted by: meria on Jan 27, 2009 2:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sick of that bull. When do planes leave X's and grids in the sky in all 4 directions? Why is anyone who questions it a conspiracy freak? Why not conspiracy facts? We have lost our blue skies to white skies, which now leaves white ash on the ground after heavy spraying. It can't be for our "health" or our imagination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: chemtrails are NOT contrails Posted by: helenwheels
if we are doomed...if "they" are going to kill us...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 27, 2009 4:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if we are doomed...if "they" are going to kill us...i hope they hurry up and get the job done soon so i can stop worrying about where my next mortgage payment and bag of groceries will come from.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On a really cold day...
Posted by: rockpicker on Jan 27, 2009 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when you walk down the street, can you see your breath? Yeah. What's it do? Makes a little white cloud, right? Then what? It doesn't follow you down the street, does it? People don't walk around in little fog banks, trailing clouds of persistent condensed water vapor wherever they go, do they? No.

The water that is expelled from your lungs turns to a liquid, and then a solid, and then mixes and dissipates into the air around you , all in relatively short order.

Same thing happens with aircraft exhaust.

That's normal. That's what has been observed for decades. That's what we can explain and expect.

Persistent aerosol trails that expand and merge into banks that eventually occlude our beautiful blue skies are another matter.

Clifford Carnicom's name is conspicuously absent from this discussion, so far. I would urge everyone interested to look him up, as he deserves more credit than anyone aforementioned, and probably has way more information than most casual readers care to expose themselves to.

www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On a really cold day... Posted by: graemebacque
This guy's an idiot! 'Nuf said!
Posted by: Styve on Jan 27, 2009 6:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No mention of the physical manifestations that have been experienced on numerous occasions, where there will be a film of dust-like material, or there are chronic respiratory ailments in the area sprayed.

Bummer Alternet doesn't screen out hacks like this clown.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This guy's an idiot! 'Nuf said! Posted by: graemebacque
Air Plane Exhaust and Debunker Exhaust
Posted by: Beguiled on Jan 27, 2009 7:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its wonderful how debunkers of chemtrails all say jet exhaust/contrails. After personally doing research by direct observation and objective findings, I hope you don't lay out in that field too long without a respirator. For all you debunkers that think jet exhaust from air craft leave persistent lines in the sky on a daily basis, do this, go out at night after these persistent contrails

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For a minute there...
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jan 27, 2009 7:52 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... I thought I was reading Fortean Times. ;p

forteantimes.com ... in case you don't know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That was the nail in the coffin for this fake left site
Posted by: alternetiscrapola on Jan 27, 2009 7:53 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is pure propaganda. I visited this site once and a while for a different perspective but this is the first time I have commented here. Having just created this account, which I will promptly delete after I post here, I just wanted to say one thing and never come back to this site again.

Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025


Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC)

It's not a conspiracy, it is an agenda. Fuck this site!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chemtrails Are Different
Posted by: redroadtraveler on Jan 27, 2009 7:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in the mountains of Colorado and am aware of chemtrails. I am a pilot and have received the weather training the author mentions. I see regular jet aircraft flights with their contrails, and I also see chemtrails. In addition to the oft-mentioned fact that chemtrails last considerably longer than contrails, there is a silk-web like substance that floats to the ground after the passage of chemtrail planes. These weblike strands hang up in the trees like the strand of a spiders web. They evaporate after about ten minutes, so it's a little hard to capture a sample for analysis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chemtrails Are Different Posted by: AJAXXXXX
Mysterious clouds
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Jan 27, 2009 8:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One early morning (just at dawn), I saw rows of dark clouds one after the other in perfect size and length above my home.

One other time in mid-day I saw three big circles which looked like big bowls of clouds in the sky. One had a funnel coming down in the middle toward the ground.

I have no idea how they got there. They were not normal formations is all I know.

I took digital photos of them. I wish I could show them but I don't think this site allows them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seen in Utah
Posted by: mangotea on Jan 27, 2009 8:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Moab, Utah and have seen the chemtrails. They do not follow the pattern that regular flights to Salt Lake City do. Once, one stretched, quite low and thick, along the roughly north/south axis of the Moab valley then, at the southern end of the valley, bore sharply eastward. There is no reason for a commercial airliner to fly that pattern or that low and it's never happened again. The chemtrails follow no regular pattern and frequently criss-cross one another in a very short period of time. One morning, I counted a dozen within a couple of hours time. Further, the heaviest concentration of them seems to occur the day before we get rainy weather. I really don't know what they are, but I'm sure they aren't contrails.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» before rainy weather Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: before rainy weather Posted by: graemebacque
There was a recent scientific study that tested foods contaminsted by jet fuel
Posted by: cori on Jan 27, 2009 9:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The researchers found that everything they tested had jet fuel in it which is a carcinogen.
I don't know if its conspiracy but sure is bad for us to ingest this stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» organic? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
The Laws of Physics
Posted by: yodo2 on Jan 27, 2009 10:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In any court of Law, the strongest proof of an event's occurance must rest on the being in accordance with natural laws. Any reasonable counter position must present doubts as to the credibililty of those stated laws.
In the case of 9/11, 2 that immediately come to mind are from experienced commercial pilots, (offhand ,I do not have their names), who tell us that it is impossible for the aircraft to have made the turns the aircraft was claimed to have made into the tower.
The 2nd was the collapse of building7, into its footprint from no known cause.I beleive the official report gave it a one sentence remark.

Similarly, the amazing bullet that took about
8 turns through Kennedy and Connerly( who convieniently changed his story to oblige the erratic bullet) remains our official history.

So it is too, with chemtrails where lab analysis has shown the great increase in concentration of both Aluminum and Barium salts , both having applications for using the atmosphere for communication and wave energy potentials, that have been reseached extensively by the military as a "force Multipier and weather controller.

If you wish to present any reasonable counter point, only counter evidence to the physical facts bear weight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it's a program to depopulate the planet it's not working!
Posted by: watching-n-waiting on Jan 27, 2009 10:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't relate to the tone set by the author of this piece. I'm a big fan of AlterNet (the moderators are the best in the business). For the most part the voices are clear, articulate and almost always a good debate emerges. But over the past few days...I dunno, something has shifted. That piece about Palin- please! And now this... I dunno there's just something a bit unsettling in the tone of this piece with phrasing such as:

As with flying saucers, hundreds of YouTube clips purport to capture cities "getting pasted" by secret government planes. Dozens of chemtrails Web sites compete for the loyalty and business of a sprawling, gullible and increasingly global chemtrails flock. Like the white lines that are its obsession, the chemtrails scene crisscrosses with every other strand in the pantheon of cosmic conspiracy culture. Most chemtrails sites, like the lovable dontchemtrailmebro.com, also peddle in 9/11 Truth, alien contact, Northern Idaho survivalism and the "suppressed" theories of the twin martyred wizards of etheric energy...

I dunno...maybe the sarcasm is lost on me but that dig at 9/11 truth seekers just seems a bit too skewed. What's wrong with questioning what is clearly a cover up? But even though it was mentioned in the artcile it's feels a bit off-topic to go there.

...back to jet fuel. I am not one of the "gullible chemtrail flock" (sorry but "yuck" to that term)- this is the first I've heard about it but I'm willing to look into it. If that makes me a conspiracy theorist then so be it (besides I'm beginning to think if one is not a conspiracy theorist then one is not paying attention).

However I do know that jet fuel and jet fuel residue IS responsible for the water table being contaminated by perchlorate with devastating effects on our health from hypothyroidism to birth defects to cancer. So in light of these facts perhaps it would be wise to at least consider the possibility that there is something to the chemtrail thing.

I know one thing for certain, when I don't know something for certain then I don't say that I know a thing for certain.

Oops here I go...SORRY... but I can't let the 9/11 thing go that easily. I know for certain that (i) in the most protected country in the world it is more than a little strange that Norad was unable to scramble jets while passenger planes were doing u-turns in the sky; and that (ii) there isn't a single photograph available of a passenger airplane having hit the most protected (and photographed) building in the most protected country in the the world. There's a whole lot more I do know for certain about 9/11 but I try not to get too far off topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad Journalism...
Posted by: ericthefoolish on Jan 27, 2009 11:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the rest of the MSM media, this article is trash. Instead of doing any real work, he looks at a few blogs, makes an opinion and writes it down...GREAT REPORTING. This is how journalism is these days. It is some "educated" dipshit peddling tripe to sheep.

How does this work? It's capitalism dummy. You don't have to do any work. You don't have to interview anyone. You don't have to spend money on supplies, research, or long hours reading. Instead, you go by what you already know and your biased opinion writes the damn article for you

This writer is complete crap in action. I have done more research then this "journalist" has in one night. I have looked up in the sky. I have noticed the differing trails, the cloud formations, and the grid like patterns.

Another thing that was not mentioned is cloud seeding which has been admittedly been going on for a long time. Why wouldn't this have any weight in this article? There are Gov't documents that talk about using chemicals on the public. THEY HAVE USED CHEMICALS ON PEOPLE. When will you get it through your thick skulls that this Govt could care less about you.

Oh and all the people that think 9/11 was exactly what the Gov't has told us...HAS NEVER, EVER, EVER opened a book and read independently the evidence behind 9/11. NOT ONE PAGE, NOT ONE WORD, NOT ONE MURMUR. Anyone with half a brain would look at the evidence and question it. GET A CLUE, OPEN A BOOK, AND FOR ONCE, JUST ONCE, THINK FOR YOUR DAMN SELVES.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sad Journalism / Thank-you Posted by: watching-n-waiting
» RE: Sad Journalism / Thank-you Posted by: ericthefoolish
Alternet is a real disappointment on issues like these..
Posted by: AJAXXXXX on Jan 27, 2009 11:20 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did they pay this guy for this obvious piece of propaganda?

If it is any consolation to those seeking the truth on this issue, we seem to be in the majority here, judging from the posts and their ratings. This gives me some measure of hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you do a really good job of...
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Jan 28, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...making people who believe chemtrails might be part of a greater conspiracy sound like lunatics.

However, you do not do a very good job of providing any real evidence that chemtrails are not part of a greater conspiracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

After reading this article and the many varied responses here...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jan 28, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I still do not have enough evidence for one position or another.

But as stated in the article:

A typical comment left under a chemtrails YouTube clip warns viewers that they are now breathing "ethylene dibromide, nano-particulates of aluminum and barium, cationic polymer fibers with unidentified bioactive material, and tiny parasitic nematode eggs of some type."

If this soup were in the air and going up your nose, it would be easily testable. So instead of throwing out opinions and conspiricies, do the testing.

But we all know that would be to easy and then the truth would be out, and people could not get off on their "religious" beliefs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chemtrails
Posted by: ClassAct on Jan 28, 2009 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I discovered many years ago that chemtrails are linked to Star Wars testing. A New York state weather station had called to inquire of a local Air Force base regarding a chemtrail formation in the sky and was apprised that it was testing for the Star Wars program. In order to make the weapons useful, detailed information regarding atmospheric conditions in every season and for every typical weather pattern are required for every region of the world where those weapons may be expected to perform. I am surprised that AlterNet is entering the debate at this late date and most of all that it’s article seems intent on telling people that they cannot believe their own eyes. As Chico put it in Duck Soup, “Who are you going to believe? Me or your own eyes?”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» testing program Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: testing program Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: testing program Posted by: AJAXXXXX
Aerosol Crimes
Posted by: rockpicker on Jan 28, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a video put together by our pre-eminent aeosol researcher, Clifford Carnicom.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2815320198655156407

and here is Carnicom's website:

www.carnicom.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the director
Posted by: the director on Jan 28, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Contrails, contrails, poison either way

Whether the evil scientists are clever enough to do what the conspirators say is irrelevant.

How much new air do we get daily?

Whether it be car emissions, plane, factory or any furnace we are “burning down the house” and creating a soup of chemicals in our atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels which may make this whole question mute for our children’s children.

We study sulfur, a crystalline mineral, which when burned at temperatures above 271 degree F. is vaporized into the upper atmosphere as little crystal mirrors which block solar energy to the surface of the Earth while warming the atmosphere.
Atmospheric warming with global cooling may be the correct perspective.

Now lets mix some of these chemical compounds which result from combustion of fossil fuels and we have high school chemistry in the making. And we get acid rain in all of its varieties.

Jet engines can use other fuels other than kerosene to fly the friendly sky, cars can run on other non carbon based fuels, such as hydrogen, water? Electricity, compressed air, etc. The technology has been available but not compared with cheap fossil fuels.

We have two choices:
Continue the madness of burning fossil fuels and write a note of apology to our future generations.

Or we can end the fossil fuel aspect of the industrial revolution, we can make plastics out of coal and crude, but no more fuel that leaves burned hydrocarbons in the atmosphere.
When a volcano such as Kilauea bleaches its exhaust skyward those elements created in the caldron are bio available in the cycles of life. When we burn the decomposed fodder of fossil fuels we do so by adding synthetic chemicals which have never seen the mouth of a volcano.

This is a pleas which I believe could resonate with everyone save for the oil giants.

No chemicals on the ground, in the air, in our food, in our water, nor in our meds.

We synthesize medications solely for the patents, the profits, when the while willow bark may be the best form of Aspirin, which was synthesized from coal tar.

Whether evil chemtrails or evil contrails like all the water that is, was; All the air we are breathing now is the same air we have been breathing since the beginning, no new air.

Patrick McGean
Director
Live Blood and Cellular Matrix Study
Body Human Project
organicsulfur@sisna.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chemtrails story published 01-27-2009
Posted by: milegallons on Jan 28, 2009 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People who write stories must get it through their heads that their using the expression "conspiracy theory" is a sure way to turn readers against them almost immediately. "Conspiracy theory" is and always has been a plug-in rhetorical device used to demean some idea without offering proof. In other words, using the expression is now backfiring big-time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHEMTRAILS ARE MILITARY AEROSOL FOR RADAR PURPOSES AND SATELLITES CONNECTIONS
Posted by: joshua65 on Jan 28, 2009 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
chemtrails programs are part of the aerospace defence program of U.S. army and N.A.T.O.the military aircraft that you see are spraying mostly barium and polimer. radar and satellite connections are used in combinations with military aerosols.the substances used are very toxic for the environment.
this is very secret military stuff, and is not normal jet exaust or normal contrail.
REMEMBER,ANY OTHER EXPLANATIONS IS A LIE,
DISCLOSE AEROSOL OPERATIONS NOW

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet takeover.
Posted by: pinkfloydd on Jan 28, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't have too many posturings about chemtrails that haven't already been posted, but let me just say that I (and friends) have seen the phenomenon first hand, while there were other 'commercial' jets in the sky simultaneously. They are not the same thing. Not even close. What a hack job this author penned.

I will have to agree with the poster above who commented on the subtle yet clear change in Alternet's latest offerings. I posted something to this effect a few weeks back. I no longer check here daily for my news, it just seems as if there's been a shift in journalistic priorities. It is becoming a little too MSM-like for me. As if something, or someone, has taken a vested interest in making Alternet more central.

I'm in 100% agreement about the propaganda in this ridiculous article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is there any difference...
Posted by: EncinoM on Jan 28, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
between the supersitous medivel aged peasant and today's conspiracy theorist. While one was a fraid of witchcraft and the devil, the other is afraid of some faceless, shadowy conspiracy. Both reject, complex or scientific explanations for the fear and favor the simple answer that the faceless other is gulity for all teh world's wrongs. While both sometimes point to individuals or groups as members, these are nothing more then cogs in the larger scheme of things. What is the difference between the fear of the Knights Templar vs. the fear of the Freemons or Rothchilds, they are both grounded in the same irrationality. Whether its the black death or 9/11 these peasants are always feard and seek simple answers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is there any difference... Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: Is there any difference... Posted by: AJAXXXXX
Contrails contribute to global dimming
Posted by: Earthian on Jan 28, 2009 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This effect is a counter-effect to global warming, reducing the effect of GHGs in the atmosphere by about 50 percent.

To find out about the effects of contrails on global dimming just search these terms:

"global dimming"

and

nova

or go here:

www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/dimming.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why America's Left is a Toothless Tiger
Posted by: Nuuon on Jan 28, 2009 1:56 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever wonder why the so-called "leftist" movement can't seem to get its ass off the ground? Why it stands frozen in the face of hundreds of thousands of murdered civilians in Iraq and hundreds of children killed in Gaza? Every wonder why the "left" could do nothing in face of two obviously stolen presidential elections in 2000 and 2004?

It's quite simple really. What passes for a "left" is actually nothing more than the "official" opposition. Wannabes-- Hoping that one day (especially those "lefties" who pass themselves off as writers) they will find cushy jobs in major media outlets, or cushy well-paying teaching jobs at some well-endowed university.

The left "leadership" is so obsessed with being accepted as "responsible" (with the accompanying whimsical thoughts of future acceptance as pundits on CNN), that they will sell their own children down the sewer. I do not exaggerate here, because in fact, this is exactly what they are doing even while they are too stupid to realize it.

Simply stated: Leftist leadership CANNOT be trusted when and where it counts: Not on the issue of who really organized the "terrorist" attack in America on 9/11/01; not on the issue of who really organized the "terrorist" attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, the Oklahoma City "terrorist" attack-- one can go on and on. Never mind how emasculated the "leftist leadership" has proven to be on the carnage that Israel unleashes whenever it feels like. Because to face up to the fact of these conspiracies would demand that they would have to move beyond rhetorical "radicalism" to hands-on "revolution" and the "left" hasn't had the balls for that since the FBI (and other government agencies) definitively kicked their collective assess in the late 1960's.

The leftist "leadership" can be depended upon to bitch up when it counts and thus there are untold millions who would gladly join it but who know that the leadership is either infiltrated, manipulated, stupid, cowardly or just plain opportunistic. The average "leftist leader" is little more than a George Bush with an "A" average.

Yes, the American "left" is a joke and those so-called "conspiracy theorists" (multi-millions strong) are not going to waste their time listening to or following a bunch of bitch-up artists. Because the left WILL ABSOLUTELY sell you out exactly when and where it counts. And articles like this provides us with documented and definitive proof. In fact, every time comfortable whimps like Noam Chomsky say or write dumb shit like "Oswald was working alone" or "it doesn't matter who did 9/11" the shame I feel makes me almost puke.

In the final analysis, this article was nothing more than one of those "see-I-am-responsible-so-please-give-me-a-job" resume stuffers.

The planet's population is going to be fried, starved and beaten into a hoard begging for world government-- and this will have happened on the watch of America's left: A prototypical toothless tiger without a courageous bone in its body. You don't take such people seriously, you read them for entertainment purposes only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article sucks.
Posted by: Blair T. Longley on Jan 28, 2009 4:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time I have researched
any important social facts,
I have always discovered
lies and coercions were
controlling real events.

The most important of them all?

Fractional Reserve Banking

That is not a conspiracy theory!

That scam is a social fact of
the triumph of the methods
of organized crime being
able to control us all.

From there, spread out lots
of other social facts, that
all are based on realities
that lies, backed up by
violence, are in control.

It takes a paradigm shift
to realize that every one
of these things that one
investigates tend to be
interconnected, since

there are interlocking
sets of crime cartels.

They control governments.

Governments are territorial
gangsters, while the group
that controls them most is
the international bankers.

It is NOT a theory, but fact.

The whole world is being
controlled by huge lies,
backed up with lots of
violence, and that is
why chemtrails are
plausible to me ...

I do not know what they are,
but I believe there is some
real evil behind them, and,

given the FACT that an elite
have privatized the powers
to make money out of zip,

and are enslaving everyone,

and clearly have an agenda,

I have no problems with a
view that chemtrails are
all too real and too evil,

although I do not know
exactly what they were,

everything else I know
makes me believe that
all governments ARE
extremely evil, and
WOULD DO this ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A little bit of history and technical details about early "chemtrail" aerosol dispersants R&D
Posted by: charles000 on Jan 28, 2009 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A little bit of history and technical details about early "chemtrail" aerosol dispersants R&D. USA and former Soviet Union

No, I am not a "conspiracy guy" by any stretch of the imagination, but as is the case with many of the "fringe" topics floating around, there is a small grain of truth at the epicenter of the swirling clouds of so-called conspiracy theories.

Many years ago, I worked for DOE at both Lawrence Berkeley and Los Alamos national labs, my principal interest at the time was in materials science, some aspects of which in current nomenclature is referred to as "nanotechnology".

Believe it or not, there was some theoretical discussions and papers being presented which did cite two specific arenas of research that could conceivably come under the heading of "chemtrails".

One such area of interest was indeed the concept of changing the relative ableto, or reflective index of the upper atmosphere, for several reasons actually.

In the case of the former Soviet Union of the time, there was considerable interest in altering the course of the jetstreams, which are high speed "rivers" of air in the upper atmosphere that affect climatic variations.

In the case of the Russian effort, the idea was to alter the severity of the weather in Siberia and related areas, so that agricultural projects could be successfully implemented in these otherwise unusable regions. I don't know how far their experiments ever got, or even if this was actually tried, but that was their intent of the time.

The other arena of research which might possibly fall into this so-called chemtrail heading was the concept of dispensing micro particulate metallic aerosols into the upper atmosphere to alter the RF reflectivity index of specific layers of the upper atmosphere, in order to create a sort of atmospheric "mirror" for highly collimated RF beams of a certain frequency range.

At the time, the interest was in over the horizon radar, and also an experimental form of radio communication system for contact with the missle launching submarine fleet.

This latter effort was particularly relevant for developing the protocols for the SALT II, or Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, as communication with the nuclear missile launching submarines had to be regulated by central authority control, comparable to the bomber fleets and ICBM missile silos of the time.

In any case, all these aforementioned activities date back many decades, during the height of the "cold war" between the USA and Soviet Union of the time.

I have no idea if chemtrails of any kind are being experimented with today, but there is a historical precedent for such.

Just thought you might be interested in some genuine technical information on such

regards

Charles

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a test
Posted by: dawnsutro@hotmail.com on Jan 28, 2009 8:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a test to see what the arguments are on this subject. It can't be pure propoganda. If it is,then it is a lame attempt and has failed. The global media uses these "hot topic" articles/stories to get a representative sample of the views on a particualr subject. They then analyze the responses and come up with modified propoganda. I call them "test" stories or "floaters".However "floaters" are generally fake stories that are floated out to the public to see if there is any interest, whereas "test" stories test the public on how the current propoganda is working. If they get the "regurgatation" they want they stick with the story.However, if they don't get the responses they desire or the counter arguments are too persusive then they "regroup" and "adjust" the propoganda. Signed: "One that can see".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is a test Posted by: AJAXXXXX
» RE: This is a test Posted by: dawnsutro@hotmail.com
CONSPIRACY OR ACCIDENTAL THEORISTS?
Posted by: Noor on Jan 28, 2009 9:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TWO VIEWS OF HISTORY

There are two fundamental ways to view history. We call one the CATASTROPHIC or ACCIDENTAL view of history. We call the other view the CONSPIRATORIAL view of history.

ACCIDENTAL HISTORY

In the catastrophic or accidental view of history we are led to believe that historical events, such as wars and revolutions were the direct result of some sudden or surprising event. While the catastrophic view is accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes, it does not always provide a realistic view of humanity and events influenced by man.

Young, malleable American and other Western minds are sadly taught the Accidental view of history in the government school systems. This view is reinforced throughout their lives by the controlled mass media. As a result, when most discover the Conspiratorial View of History, the immediate reaction is shock, disbelief and a refusal to accept something other than they've been taught to believe.
Conspiratorial History

CONSPIRATORIAL history studies that part of history that is a product of man's planning. In conspiratorial history we are led to believe that events, such as wars and revolutions, are the result of planned events. While the conspiratorial view is not accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes, it is a realistic and accurate view of the interrelationship of man and nations. Since the planning for most of these events was done in secret, we use the term conspiratorial history. That is; this history is the result of plans constructed in secret, which by definition is a conspiracy.

Interestingly enough, the Conspiratorial View of History is also the Biblical View of History. Try Psalms 2 for starters.*

We believe that current world events are not simply circumstantial, but the result of an organized campaign by an elite group of unseen and widely unknown world leaders. Their goal is to exercise absolute dictatorial control over the world, to establish a New World Order.

You choose your belief pattern folks. But know, there is a reason why humanity is doomed to repeat its mistakes until it learns from its past. And today, all that we are, is the culmination of our past!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CONSPIRACY OR ACCIDENTAL THEORISTS? Posted by: dawnsutro@hotmail.com
» RE: CONSPIRACY OR ACCIDENTAL THEORISTS? Posted by: dawnsutro@hotmail.com
Liora
Posted by: lioralourie on Jan 29, 2009 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live near Beijing international airport, and have documented the difference between Chemtrails and Contrails for over 3 years.

They behave differently and indeed there are different flying patterns, and aircraft.

Chemtrails in our area are always horizon to horizon, N-S and E-W. Incoming jets circle the city in a particular way, and those contrails disappear relatively quickly with none of the "puffing" that chem trails exhibit.

I believe the chemtrails may be working with the HAARP program in Alaska either to change the magnetic movement of Earth, create/enhance hurricanes, earthquakes and other "natural" weather events. And/or to enhance or destroy military signals. See Earthpulse.com and Nick Begich PhD's take on those topics to learn more.

The earthquake in Chengdu, Sichuan province on May 12, 2008 was preceded by a strange reflections in the sky-- rainbow shimmering lights-- beginning about 10 minutes beforehand. Several different amateur youtube videos attest to this and it's stunning.

This article is demeaning and the ignorance and bias of the author shines right through. Alternet is being used as a source of disinformation....again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chemtrails, UFOs
Posted by: groupw on Jan 29, 2009 7:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think enouph proof exists to eliminate the, are they real question.
The real question is how are we going to stop it.The boys at the pentagon have way to much time on their hands.This probably began as some kind of hair-brained idea to adress the global warming issue,and when they realized they could eliminate all the people with compromised immune systems all in one shot it was a home run. Add in some biological to the mix because we know theyve done that before.
Using your own population for biological testing is nothing new.
So the question isn't are they real, the q is
how long are we going to take it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 -