Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Shrinking Glaciers Have Put Tibetans in the Path of Climate Chaos

By Christina Larson, Christian Science Monitor. Posted January 22, 2009.


Less snow in the mountains means less water and less food. It also means more of the same for other Asian nations downstream.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For Tenzin Dorje, the road home keeps getting longer. Each year the Tibetan shepherd must walk farther to find streams where his sheep can drink.

"I am an old man," he says, clutching the neck of his cane. Sometimes he trudges six hours a day, twice his old route. He has contemplated learning to ride a motorbike like his grandson, but fears it might be too discomfiting for an 80-year-old man.

The problem is that streams in the province of western China where he lives are drying up, receding into the mountains.

As recent years have brought higher temperatures and altered how snowmelt trickles down from glaciers on the Tibetan-Qinghai plateau, water is becoming scarce.

Mr. Tenzin lives in a small village nestled amid dramatic mountains peaks. Strings of Tibetan prayer flags flap against a still-brilliant blue sky. Yet this apparent purity and timelessness masks another reality: He is living on the frontier of climate change.

Tenzin's village is on the slopes of the rugged Qilian mountains in western Gansu province. Glaciers on the mountains are the primary source of water for humans, farms, and industry in his village of Baijiaowan and for others north and south of the range.

The streams distinguish the landscape, including a string of oasis towns along the Old Silk Road, from the abutting Gobi Desert. Today, the desert is expanding.

"The climate is changing," says Zhang Mingquan, a professor of earth and environmental sciences at Lanzhou University, in the provincial capital. "Snow is the source of the stream water, and now the stream water is less than before."

Recent years have seen higher temperatures and less precipitation. As a result, mountaintop ice is receding.

The Chinese Academy of Social Sci­ences estimates that the glacial area on the Tibetan-Qinghai plateau, the world's largest ice sheets outside the poles, is shrinking about 7 percent each year.

It might seem that melting glaciers would bring more water in the short term. But that isn't necessarily the case, says Michael MacCracken of the Climate Institute in Washington.

"Glaciers and snow on mountains serve as a storage mechanism for water, holding it for later," he says. "The area of the glaciers is an indication for how well that system is working." Think of glaciers as a bowl, and snowfall as rice – a shrinking bowl holds less rice. Receding glaciers capture less annual snowfall.

"Without the glaciers, snow and rainfall tend to seep into the soil – usually mountain soil is quite porous – and then it later evaporates," says Dr. MacCracken.

In nearby Minqing county, instead of walking farther for water, farmers dig deeper. Fifty years ago, wells tapped groundwater at 50 feet. Now they must drill 100 feet or more. With less snowmelt, groundwater is not fully replenished.

Glaciers stretching across the towering Tibetan-Qinghai plateau sustain all the great rivers of Asia – the Yang­­tze and Yellow Rivers in China; the Ganges, Indus, and Brahmaputra in India; the Mekong and Salween in Southeast Asia.

"With climate change, all these rivers will have greatly reduced flows," says Carter Brandon, director of the World Bank's China environment program in Beijing. "There will also be much more seasonal variation – when flow is more dependent on rainfall, as opposed to the steady inflow of snowmelt from glaciers."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: china, water, global warming, climate change, drought, water scarcity, tibet

Christina Larson is a journalist focusing on international environmental issues. Her reporting has brought her to seven provinces across China, as well as cities and villages in Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Greece. She now divides her time primarily between Washington, DC and Beijing. Her writing has appeared in The New York Times, The New Republic, Christian Science Monitor, China Environment Series, and The Washington Monthly, where she is a contributing

editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Start by ratifying and abiding by the Kyoto Protocol.
Posted by: Nietzsche’s Bastard on Jan 27, 2009 12:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But spare me the “Let China and India develop unimpeded”. If they can't get it right in 10,000 years, screw ‘em.

All or Nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

California
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jan 27, 2009 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't have to go so far to see this: California is in the same boat, and Glacier Park will soon have no glaciers. Most Oregon agriculture depends on snowmelt, too. The whole West will change radically.

Looking hard at the bright side: we'll soon be able to grow oranges. But not apples, of course. And my place is above 200 ft. of elevation, well above any possible sea level rise. The Willamette River will be an arm of the ocean, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: California Posted by: monkeywrench
shiver m timbers
Posted by: edgar1 on Jan 27, 2009 5:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
too bad the world is gettin COOLER! current data doesn't fit into the poltically correct UN IPCC outdated outlook of warming. Obama is headed over Niagra Falls on climate change. Change you can depend on? I don't think so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ranger1
Posted by: ranger1 on Feb 1, 2009 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is all too little too late. the place to make the biggest change in the system is worldwide disarmament...The israeli forces alone got 300 million gallons of refined fuel to burn in war...and our military contracts with exxon mobile and others have to be seen to be believed.

http://www.peakoil.com/article23482.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement