Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Business Is Booming for Industry Catering to Survivalists

By Josh Allen, Christian Science Monitor. Posted January 3, 2009.


Once seen as a radical and paranoid ideology, survivalism is expanding as a business, and growing fast.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Popular interest in survivalism took off in a big way in the late 1990s, amid concerns about the much-discussed Y2K computer bug said to threaten world information technology. Since then, Mr. Ritter says, newer businesses have entered the disaster-preparation market to provide a variety of goods and services to survive a range of crises.

"Fear is a factor that often draws people into preparedness," Rantala writes in an e-mail. "Pandemic, economic disaster, climate change, world war -- these are some big-picture threats that some folks want to be able to counter."

Industry businesses' sales pitches are often equal parts professional marketing presentations and public service announcements. Survival skills author and instructor Cody Lundin has a website that includes a biography, video clips, training course descriptions, and a full-color résumé, complete with photo. Shane Connor, president of KI4U, distributes free nuclear-disaster survival guides, instructing people to keep rain ponchos, dust masks, and honey (a high-calorie food that doesn't spoil) on hand at all times.

While survivalist offerings expand, consumers often have different ideas of what exactly it means to "be prepared."

"I'll get one potential buyer who will say, 'I want to have a remote location,' and for him that means a house a couple miles out of town," says Moss, the realtor. "Then I'll get the guy who wants to be able only to hike into his location."

Such wide-ranging reactions are hardly surprising, says one expert, given that the crises survivalist goods are meant to address are as much a product of imagination as they are of real threats.

"The entrepreneurship of survival is nothing new," says Richard Mitchell Jr., professor emeritus at Oregon State University and author of "Dancing at Armageddon: Survivalism and Chaos in Modern Times." The narrative is that "there are troubles ahead, but 'just right' troubles, the kind survivalists have the means to confront ... imagined troubles always match the means at hand -- or what is for sale to solve the problem."

As survivalist businesses grow in uncertain economic times, consumers new to the lifestyle might be overwhelmed by choices. Industry insiders suggest those preparing for the worst do their homework to find companies that put surviving disasters, not profit-making, at the core of their mission. Mr. Lundin estimates that only 5 percent of survivalist businesses are actually committed to living the lifestyle.

For Ritter, of Equipped to Survive, this means that people need to be serious about how they go about purchasing peace of mind. The recession might be cutting into paychecks and cheap survival gear ordered from a slick new website might seem like a great deal, he says, but in a disaster other considerations are more important. "There's a key question," he says. "Are you willing to bet your life on a piece of equipment?"


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: survivalists

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Survivalists
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 3, 2009 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article's basic message is good: that there is a marketing side, a political side, and a practical side to all of this stuff.

The blue-collar wing-nuts call it "survivalism." The yuppies call it "voluntary simplicity", etc...

My preferred term is "getting off the grid", because I'm more interested in practical ways to reduce my dependence on The Man right now than preparing for The Day After, or leaving a $300k consulting career as soon as I get the guts...I mean, we're all pretty much screwed on The Day After anyway, and whoever is left will just loot the stuff from all the people who were prepared, so what's the point?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Survivalists Posted by: Lauren
IM GONNA DIE!!!
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 3, 2009 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FEAR IS A GREAT CONTROL TOOL AND A MONEY MAKER

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IM GONNA DIE!!! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: IM GONNA DIE!!! Posted by: Beck
» RE: IM GONNA DIE!!! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: IM GONNA DIE!!! Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: IM GONNA DIE!!! Posted by: Blink
Survival?
Posted by: montana karma on Jan 3, 2009 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Montana and the Vermiculite mine there, (libby) has poisoned the area and now is the armpit of Montana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Survival? Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Survival? Posted by: Zeugitai
emancipation from wage slavery
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jan 3, 2009 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Survivalists/homesteaders want to be able to pay off the land, live off the land, and tell the boss, the government, the oil companies, utility companies, overcharging and underpaying grocery stores and retailers, and peer pressure to F**K OFF.

What's wrong with that? Did I forget anybody??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Forget someone? Posted by: BlueTigress
Wish I Could Get Away From it All
Posted by: Gravitas on Jan 3, 2009 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to live in a cabin in the woods somewhere, raise chickens, write outrageous fiction and throw tea parties for cats! As long as I don't have to give up my internet connection...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ah, thats the rub right there... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
You know, we can learn survivalism from cats.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 3, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course their lives are completely different from ours but they sure can make a good picking at life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In hard times...
Posted by: buzzsaw on Jan 3, 2009 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Survivalism, by whatever name, always comes to the forefront. It was big during the '70's and 80's with their oil shocks and recessions, Y2K was a blip, and of course, now.

For a "lone wolf" to go out into the woods to live solely by his own efforts would require for the first year, enough food to last until whatever crops he planted are edible, supplemented by hunting and gathering (don't eat those red berries, they're poisonous). All tools would have to be muscle or solar-powered. Consider a generator: it typically has a 5-gallon fuel tank which will run it for about 10 hours. If you run it 5 hours a day, say to power a freezer and other equipment, that's over 900 gallons of gasoline, where do you store this? And it's just for one year--gasoline doesn't keep well.

There are reasons that humans have historically banded together. Subsistence farm families were typically large. This was to provide a labor force, and to increase the chances that some of the kids would survive to be able to take care of mama and papa when they are too old to work.

This time around, it may be more of a realization that we are too dependent on people we don't know, and systems we don't understand, let alone know how to operate, in order to live a decent life. Our public infrastructure and supply lines have been long neglected, and are proving fragile (remember the short circuit in Ohio a few years ago that shut off the electricity in most of the northeastern US?). Furthermore, many of us don't even know our neighbors, so we sense that in a disaster, it could become every man for himself, which is a bad thing in an urban environment.

Survival in the most likely scenarios we might face, is going to be more about what and who you know than how many MRE's you've got stashed. The scenarios include local problems like earthquakes, tornadoes, floods and hurricanes, and ice storms causing extended power outages. All bets really are off after a nuclear exchange. Take stock of what you need and can provide, find out the same from your neighbors. Get people together and make some plans as to who is to do or provide what. The context of a neighborhood association or watch group may be a good place to start.

Although some of the products may have some utility during a crisis, survival is not a product one can buy off a shelf. We would be better served by rethinking needs and wants, and rebuilding local infrastructure and support systems, including transportation, agriculture and manufacturing, preferably under local control.

buzzsaw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In hard times... Posted by: eklawson
How soon will we all just "survive?"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 3, 2009 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If our laissez-faire, "few-winners-many-losers" socio-economic structure will not let us work quickly, cooperatively, and creatively to head off the coming catastrophe that our unsustainable lifestyle and unfettered population growth has burdened us with, then survivalism in the not-so-distant future may become the new norm. For many in the "underdeveloped" world, it already is, but, thanks to our profligate lifestyle, sooner than we think we may join them.

We have squandered our spirit out of lust for things, and now that lust is going to ruin us.

Ignorance can be cured by learning, but stupidity lasts forever.

I'm glad I'm not young.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not a bad idea, really... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Not a bad idea, really... Posted by: pelican beak
Survival Mentality can be based in Fear, or...
Posted by: djnoll on Jan 6, 2009 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it can be based in community and hope. We are at a crossroads in this country and many of us are trying to find the best road to follow. I have thought often of living off the grid and in isolation from my fellow man (usually as the result of the stupidity I so often see from our government and our media). However, I have come to realize that this is fear and it does neither myself nor anyone else one bit of good.

So I look to help communities to create sustainable practices that can lead to survival not only of their towns, but also of a society. When a community can feed itself, and still have excess, then it can reach out and help its neighbors in times of trouble. If a community plans for water shortages so that it has enough for its citizens and some extra, then it can offer a drink to someone passing through. When a community has jobs and houses that are open or unused, it can offer jobs to the unemployed and homes to the homeless without fear of reprisal.

We have forgotten how to work together to help our communities and our neighbors. It is time to re-establish that and create networks that can work together to help each other out. Then not only do we not have to fear, we can offer hope and help to others.

NOW, I CHALLENGE THE REST OF YOU WHO PREACH THAT WE WILL BE OVERRUN BY THE HUNGRY AND THE SCARED, TO STOP TALKING ABOUT VIOLENCE, AND GET TO WORK MAKING OUR COMMUNITIES WHOLE AND SUSTAINABLE SO WE DO NOT LIVE IN FEAR ANY LONGER! For far too long now, we have allowed our government to tell us to go shopping and to be afraid of the rest of the world because of their skin color or religion. It is time to change the way we think, and once again embrace those things that are different about us. It is time to create sustainable communities based on our commonalities and for the common good. Only when we have done that will we survive and once again be strong. Then survival becomes the providence of hope and giving, not fear and hate. It becomes about the joy of living and no longer about the fear of dying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement