Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Environmental Spill Disaster Devastates Tennessee; 48 Times the Size of Exxon Valdez

By Matthew McDermott, TreeHugger. Posted December 25, 2008.


Approximately 500 million gallons of coal ash sludge has broken through a holding pond at a coal-fired plant.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

 

The video below is a shocking helicopter-level view of the immense coal ash sludge spill in Tennessee.

An environmental disaster of epic proportions has occurred in Tennessee. Monday night, 2.6 million cubic yards (the equivalent of 525.2 million gallons, 48 times more than the Exxon Valdez spill by volume) of coal ash sludge broke through a dike of a 40-acre holding pond at TVA's Kingston coal-fired power plant covering 400 acres up to six feet deep, damaging 12 homes and wrecking a train.

According to the EPA the cleanup will take at least several weeks, but could take years. Officials also said that the magnitude of this spill is such that the entire area could be declared a federal superfund site.

Toxic Sludge Got Into Tributary of Chattanooga Water Supply

Apart from the immediate physical damage, the issue is what toxic substances are in that sludge: Mercury, arsenic, lead, beryllium, cadmium. Though officials said the amounts of these poisons in the sludge could not be determined on Monday, they could (at the mild end) irritate skin or trigger allergies or (longer term) cause cancer or neurological problems.

This toxic sludge got into the Emory River, a tributary of the Clinch and Tennessee Rivers: The water supply for Chattanooga, Tennessee as well as millions of people living downstream in Alabama, Tennessee and Kentucky. TVA says that as yet the spill (which they are characterizing as a mudslide or landslide, but frankly it's still toxic…) has not affected the water quality in the Emory River.

High Levels of Rain, Thaw Freeze Cycles May Have Weakened Pond Walls

On why the spill happened, the Tennessean speculated,

The area received almost 5 inches of rain this month, compared with the usual 2.8 inches. Freeze and thaw cycles may have undermined the sides of the pond. The last formal report on the condition of the 40-acre pond -- an unlined, earthen structure -- was issued in January and was unavailable Monday, officials said.

Greenpeace Calls for Criminal Investigation

In a press release issued yesterday, noting that spills of similar substances have resulted in felony charges, Greenpeace called for a criminal investigation into the spill:

"Every facility like this is supposed to have a spill contingency plan to prevent this kind of disaster," said Rick Hind, Greenpeace Legislative Director. "The authorities need to get to the bottom of what went wrong and hold the responsible parties accountable."

TVA Releases Official Statement

In an official statement, TVA president and CEO Tom Kilgore said,

Protecting the public, our employees, and the environment is TVA's primary concern as we supply electric power for the people of Tennessee Valley region. We deeply regret that a retention wall for ash containment at our Kingston Fossil Plant failed, resulting in an ash slide and damage to nearby homes.

We are grateful no injuries have been reported, and we will take all appropriate actions to assist those affected by this situation.

We appreciate the continuing efforts of local and state agencies, as well as TVA employees, to respond to this situation quickly and efficiently. Our intense effort to respond effectively will continue 24/7 for the foreseeable future with the safety of the public our top priority.

Clean Coal, Yeah Right

As many people in the blog world are noting, it's this sort of thing that really makes the proposition of clean coal so absurd. Even if you can scrub all the CO2 out of it, you still have so many other toxic waste products associated with burning coal that have to be stored that carbon emissions are just a part of the problem. How many other holding ponds are out there waiting to burst?

AlterNet is making this material available in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107: This article is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

 

 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: coal, tennessee, spill

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Welcome to the USA!
Posted by: Zeugitai on Dec 25, 2008 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know how to git 'er done here! --Pollution? --Toxic wastes? Whiners!! Grow yourselves a spine and wade in with your shovels. Now the dumbass taxpayers can pay, and pay with everything they've got, for the irresponsible practice and catastrophic damage caused by another upright and stellar American enterprise. Come on, everyone, let's bail them out, both literally and figuratively this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How long?
Posted by: motamanx6 on Dec 25, 2008 2:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How long is a holding pond supposed to hold that sh... sludge.? Does it stay there forever?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How long? Posted by: willymack
More Toxic Mobile Homes?
Posted by: Purple Girl on Dec 25, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people were effected and could be displaced?
Is the Bush admin going to let any effort to side until after Obama is swore in? Or will he try to be helpful -as Only W can do- and send some of those FEMA trailers over for the displaced? Not sure what's more frightening W not doing anything, or doing something. The man is a walking comedic tragedy when it comes to natural disaster....Well Ok ANYTHING!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You have the WRONG idea about FEMA Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
Possibly...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Dec 25, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...some of the people of Tennessee maybe could stop voting for their Republicans and the Repubs endless greed. But then maybe they won't.

Throw Scalia and his friends out of the SCOTUS and the Repubs out of government for the next 20 years and the Family of Man just might yet, maybe, possibly have a chance for survival.

Oh welll!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wrong bad guys Posted by: mgmyers79
This disaster IS yet another...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Dec 25, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...example of the Reagan-Bushie-Repubs deregulation and no regulation and endless GREED. And once again, done at the expense of others. That's the funny thing about greed, somebody else always pays the price, either in blood or in treasure.

This disaster in Tennessee is yet another example of what we have been seeing beginning during the days of St. Reagan and now culminating and reaching full bloom under the Texas twit, GWB, The Decider, and his Moral Majority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» its too easy to blame Bush Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: its too easy to blame Bush Posted by: madcat007
» RE: its too easy to blame Bush Posted by: Bob Doublin
Then there's the uranium to worry about, too.
Posted by: DanYHKim on Dec 25, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been known for quite a while that fly ash from coal combustion, being the concentrated mineral component of large volumes of coal, contains significant amounts of uranium and thorium. A report from Oak Ridge National Laboratories estimated that the energy content from radioactive material may exceed that of the coal itself.

Here's a link to an article in last year's Scientific American: Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush type inspectors of this dam?
Posted by: texasrodeoqueen on Dec 25, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Good job, Brownie"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stephen F. Thiel
Posted by: AJR Journal on Dec 25, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Tennessee Valley Authority is a government-owned enterprise, so socialism and government-owned enterprises are the real culprit here. If the TVA was an investor-owned enterprise, this would probably never happened. Privately owned entities are VASTLY superior to these typically poorly-run, misdirected organizations.
Also, nuclear power plants do not require ash-retention ponds!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stephen F. Thiel Posted by: Lauren
» You've got to be kidding... Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: Stephen F. Thiel Posted by: wormsign
» Bull Hockey Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Stephen F. Thiel Posted by: Bob Doublin
» RE: Stephen F. Thiel Posted by: AJR Journal
Going to get worse
Posted by: US Citizen 07 on Dec 25, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the worthless excuse of a man and American (Bush), is presently passing bills giving these types of outfits the power to regulate themselves. He says they don't need environmental organizations to regulate the pollution they create.

At the rate our administration is going I don't know why they don't just push the button and get it over with.

This is exactly why the US dumping 6,700 Tons of radioactive sand from Kuwait in Idaho. They can't safely contain this toxic pollution.

Do people realize that if these types of contaminates get into the water and ground, they are contaminated FOREVER.

Big deal, we can live without food and water, can't we.

Jeesh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Barbara, Michigan Posted by: avidAmerican
» Simple Answer: Neo-cons Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Stupid Logic Posted by: US Citizen 07
Where is the National Media?
Posted by: gjones on Dec 25, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that there is no national media coverage of this horrifying "accident", after all Tennessee isn't nearly as romantic as Valdez Alaska.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where is the National Media? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» There is coverage Posted by: EinMD
Barbara, Michigan
Posted by: avidAmerican on Dec 25, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you hear me now? There is no such thing as "clean coal" technology. Think the idiots will ever learn? Stop pushing that trashy use of filth to power the U.S. You can see the results right here, nothing more is needed to say. Shame on these lie spreaders trying to claim coal is clean. It is not clean, and it causes cancer, to boot. It's the Senators in the coal states who want to push this mess on us for their own monetary gain. Shame on them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barbara, Michigan Posted by: US Citizen 07
Try Ecuador on for size
Posted by: crazy carlos on Dec 25, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Texaco/Cheveron are now trying to claim the Good Housekeeping Seal of approval on a monstrosity of a DELIBERATE oil contamination of a Rhoade Island size parcel of land in this tiny dirt poor country. The oil amount of contamination is 100 TIMES the size of the Exxon Valdez and was done so the company could save a few bucks per barrel of oil--and it was done INTENTIONALLY--the slude was simply dumped on the ground and into the waterways. Increadible amounts of cancer and birth defects are now showing up. This began in the 60's.

Cheveron is facing a possible 27 Billion Dollar cleanup of the site and of course the U.S. government and Cheveron are exerting tremendous pressure on this small poor state.

To add to the fiasco, Cheveron has never mentioned anything about this huge potential lien againist it profite in it;s 10Q filings so the stock buying public never knew of this liability. The SEC was sued but after looking at the Matoff 50 Billion $$ swindle we know what the outcome is going to be. Nada!!

I am somewhat aware of this item because I have been traveling to So. America looking for a place to go when our Facist wanta be country get into its grove. We are paying taxes to support a Mafia styled government plain and simple. Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one party is responsible
Posted by: PrinceRobert on Dec 25, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for this and similar disasters. There are plenty of Democrats with their fingers in the pie. First of all, our lifestyle is the real culprit, we consume so they manufacture. There is not enough clean energy anywhere to maintain our present lifestyle, especially with our present world population. And a privately run power plant would be thinking of profit first, would cut as many corners as possible, so it's irrelevant that this was the TVA, quasi govt operation. Privatization is always more costly and less accountable. We MIGHT make some progress if we get away from convenient labelling. Greedy, corrupt people come in all shapes, stripes, spots, gender, size. Our problem, People, is to get the govt of this nation back in OUR control, under the US Constitution, indict, try, convict and jail the criminals that have destroyed this nation, regardless of their political affiliation or last name or title. Greenpeace is right, criminal investigations are in order for this disaster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No one party is responsible Posted by: we_need_Abe
wake up people
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Dec 25, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lack of media coverage and the downplaying of the incident by those who do cover it are just another example of the manipulation of the information available to the masses. People in the affected area need to get off their arses and demand action and answers. I know the timing is terrible with the economy and all but we need a re-awakening of social consciousness and action or the corporatocracy will continue to further control our lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The Alamo" of Coal
Posted by: REDgodowar on Dec 25, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of watching for more incidents, progressives (hint: those making the "Reality" commercials about coal, etc.) should single out this incident, and exploit it for all it's worth toward extinction of the myth of "Clean Coal", the coal industry itself; and as a rallying cry for a 100% investment in alternative, renewable energy infrastructure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "The Alamo" of Coal Posted by: willymack
if mainstream media doesn't cover it, did it really happen?
Posted by: Curiouser on Dec 25, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
may i assume that since i find no reference to this disaster in mainstream media, i.e., cnn, fox... that it didn't really happen? may i also safely conclude that alternet and all other liberal alarmists are just trying to scare me out of my exceedingly comfortable zone of blind reliance and obedience to all that is dictated by industry and government??

how could you dare try to rattle my complacency in this holiday season?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clean Up Toxic Soil with Hemp
Posted by: hempjack on Dec 25, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Phytoremediation: Using Plants to Clean Soil

In 1998, Phytotech, along with Consolidated Growers and Processors (CGP) and the Ukraine's Institute of Bast Crops, planted industrial hemp, Cannabis sp., for the purpose of removing contaminants near the Chernobyl site. Cannabis is in the Cannabidaceae family and is valuable for its fiber, which is used in ropes and other products. This industrial variety of hemp, incidentally, has only trace amounts of THC, the chemical that produces the "high" in a plant of the same genus commonly known as marijuana.

Overall, phytoremediation has great potential for cleaning up toxic metals, pesticides, solvents, gasoline, and explosives. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that more than 30,000 sites in the United States alone require hazardous waste treatment. Restoring these areas and their soil, as well as disposing of the wastes, are costly projects, but the costs are expected to be reduced drastically if plants provide the phytoremediation results everyone is hoping for.

http://www.mhhe.com/biosci/pae/botany

/botany_map/articles/article_10.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah, and what next Posted by: US Citizen 07
Anyone who thinks...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Dec 25, 2008 3:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That there is any way to "clean this up" is totally delusional. This is what we were talking about when all you good republicans and dems too were promoting deregulation. Sure, you wouldn't see anything really bad for maybe a decade or two but then, things that should have been mandatorially maintained and were instead just left to be, begin to fail en masse... so now watch... there are containment ponds and levees all over this country that have been sitting, unmaintained for decades now... new orleans levees failed, this one... I would wager you'll see lots more events like this in the not too distant future. This land in Tennessee is ruined... wait til you see it in spring... what all those toxins do to the wildlife.

Do you love it? Do you hate it? Here it is, the way you made it...
WOOOOOW (Frank Zappa)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MORE INFORMATION
Posted by: US Citizen 07 on Dec 25, 2008 5:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a good place to go to find out more.....

The Tennessean

Flood of sludge breaks TVA dike
Collapse poses risk of toxic ash

http://www.tennessean.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Roane County: poor and polluted
Posted by: littlepitcher on Dec 25, 2008 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The EPA in TN must have brain rot from excess toxins. Roane County has long been polluted with sulfuric acid and particulates, both from the steam plant and from foundry pollutants. It's a job-poor county, many there drive to Chattanooga and Knoxville to work (not counting the area moonshiner who hid his flume in the steam plant clouds) and anything which limits employment is discouraged.
Floods are common and severe. TVA spends more time politicking than protecting citizens. The "little black helicopter" scandal decried by the Right turned out to be copters from TVA's Ala plants, dropping cocaine to area dealers.
The news releases claiming no water pollution was found from the slide are almost certainly bogus. TVA has been a hotbed of corruption for years, guaranteed immunity because the job pool they provided made average incomes in the area look good instead of desperately tiny and limited.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NEWS COVERAGE
Posted by: US Citizen 07 on Dec 25, 2008 5:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People are not finding much coverage because all they are saying is.......

1st tests: Water safe after Tenn. ash deluge

If you do a search with this line you will find plenty, but it is being downplayed and brushed off.

As usual....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Wow
Posted by: willymack on Dec 25, 2008 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't hold your breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Wow
Posted by: EinMD on Dec 25, 2008 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bet you two batman cookies that the whole thing will be forgotten inside of a month (outside of the locals who lost their homes of course), nobody will be fined or arrested and the insurance companies these homes were insured under will blow off the home owners as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Insurance Excuse Posted by: US Citizen 07
wildflower
Posted by: sleastewart on Dec 25, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comment on phytoremediation is the only one concearned with fixing the problem, not the blame. There is plenty of blame to go around. Particularly because TVA is a government entity, and should follow the highest standard of environmental protection, not the lowest.

I am curious why there was so much sludge in one pond. That would take way too long to decant. Once that poisonous sludge is dried, it can be made into concrete - binding all those heavy metals so they don't leach out, even in water. That makes it a very desirable building material, and very expensive to buy.

Selling the dried sludge would certainly reduce the cost of operating the power plant. As I recall, TVA was created to provide jobs and cheap electricity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clean coal is a bad joke
Posted by: EinMD on Dec 25, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard about this on a blog on December 23rd and did some searches on google, CNN, fox noise, MSNBC. Nada.

Know who had it other than the local news outlets in the area? Scientific American.

First MSM outlet to notice it as far as I can tell was CNN a day later. Meanwhile over 400 acres of land is covered in six feet of toxic crap.

There's your clean coal. Piled up six feet high in your living room.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Problem
Posted by: Sparks56 on Dec 26, 2008 2:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Clean" coal leaves us with the same problem as "clean" nuclear energy; what do we do with the waste?
The problem isn't energy, it's over-population, and nobody is talking about that lately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: US Citizen 07
Good luck cleaning this up...
Posted by: minmotstand on Dec 26, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the looks of it the Tennessee river, other waterways, groundwater, farmland, residential areas, and other land is going to be heavily contaminated for a long time.

They still haven't cleaned up contaminated land after Chernobyl.

Coal, coal pollution and waste contain mercury, uranium, arsenic, and several other toxic heavy metals.

Some of these metals are going to be around for decades, and uranium can stick around for hundreds or thousands of years.

I haven't read anything about how they plan to clean this up...

And then what are we going to do, store it somewhere else so it can happen again and contaminate more land?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environment
Posted by: Bibsisis on Dec 27, 2008 12:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Exxon Valdese, not Valdez.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Headline of article...
Posted by: Bibsisis on Dec 27, 2008 12:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Exxon Valdese, not VALDEZ!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politicians say nothing; where to find info.
Posted by: BJH on Dec 27, 2008 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I looked at several Tennessee newspapers and found no comments from any city, state or federal politicians.

Area newspapers to look at for coverage include www.chattanoogan.com , www.timesfreepress.com , www.knoxnews.com (photos), http://www.roanecounty.com (local county), and www.tennessean.com .

Regional environmental groups covering the story include the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy ( www.cleanenergy.org) and United Mountain Defense ( www.unitedmountaindefense.org).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clean coal, yeah right
Posted by: orftc on Dec 29, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not saying there's such a thing as "clean coal." For the record though...

The IGCC process typically billed as "clean coal" supposedly results in a solid waste byproduct that has a glass-like form (rather than the ash and sludge produced by burning coal). If I'm remembering correctly, IGCC produces a smaller volume of solid waste, too. If true, IGCC would make spills like this much less likley.

Folks serious about opposing "clean coal" probably don't want to use this man-made disaster as an example of why it won't work.
Mountaintop removal, subsidence from long-wall mining, AMD and countless other examples seem much stronger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When will we learn?
Posted by: rightpark on Dec 30, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mercury, arsenic, and lead - oh my! As if we needed any more reasons to invest in solar and wind clean energy, here we go again, working AGAINST the environment rather than working WITH it. I choose wind power over toxic sludge. -Lisa (onthefox.blogspot.com)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]