Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

5 Ways to Usher in the New Green Age

By Kevin Danaher and Alisa Gravitz, AlterNet. Posted December 22, 2008.


Here are five steps we need to take now, to ensure our planet, and our species, is around to see the fruits of our labor.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

To pass on to our grandchildren healthy, thriving communities, instead of a desperate world, we need to accelerate the transition to the green economy: one that works for people and planet, social and economic justice, community and environmental health.

Here are five steps we need to take now, to ensure our planet, and our species, is around to see the fruits of our labor.

First, we need to change the story. How do we recruit more people to the triple-bottom-line economic model (integrating social justice, environmental restoration, and financial sustainability) that is steadily replacing the outdated profit-maximizing economic model?

Second, we need to push capital into this triple-bottom-line type of investing -- for people and the planet. We have to get away from the short-term perspective of the current investment system, which seeks to maximize profits on a quarterly, even daily and sometimes minute-by-minute basis. We have to move from this "short-termism," which is at the root of the current crisis, to one that takes a long-term view of how current policies will impact our great grandchildren.

We are now seeing a growing competition between a single-bottom line economy that is all about money and a triple-bottom line economy that balances social equity, environmental restoration, and financial sustainability. Our prediction is that the triple-bottom-line economy is the stronger model and will eventually prevail, but we need to accelerate that transition.

Third, we need to redefine free enterprise from "the freedom of big corporations" to go anywhere and do anything to people and planet, to "the freedom of everyone to be enterprising." The current system concentrates wealth and power; we want to have thriving prosperity and empowerment everywhere.

The old political model -- of the Republicans, Democrats, Marxist-Leninists, and so on -- was to create a political party that could somehow gain state power and then change the economy from the national government level downward. The green economy movement is reversing that entire process, saying, "Get control of the economy at the local level and build up from there, so you have a truly empowered democracy from the grassroots up."

Fourth, we need to design everything with a cradle-to-cradle perspective. Think of the honeybee. Does the honeybee hurt the flower when it makes honey, or does it help the flower? Nature operates on a totally closed loop. In nature, there is no waste. People say, "Throw it away." There is no "away."

Fifth, we need to spread green measurement of growth. What is the ideology of the cancer cell? Grow, grow, grow. The cells of a metastasizing tumor have no concern for their impact on neighboring cells. What is suburban sprawl? What is the mindset of the traditional property developer? They don’t care about their impact on the environment. It is grow, grow, grow: the ideology of the cancer cell.

We need a new way to grow – by growing value and well-being, not the destructive growth of a cancer cell.  Health, education, sustainably-grown food, renewable energy technology – that's what you'll see in the green economy "market basket" of goods and services.  In the green economy, you'll see thrifty, cooperative activity as economic basics: from planting gardens, to conserving energy, to neighborhood tool lending libraries, to holding clothing swaps, to giving the gift of your time at the holidays.

We need to favor life values over money values. The world has two systems in conflict: the money cycle and the life cycle. Our species needs to answer this question: Should we have money values dominate the life cycle, or should life values rule over the money cycle?

The task before us is nothing less than how to save humanity from itself. Yes, that sounds like a big project, but I. F. Stone used to say, "If you expect an answer to your question during your lifetime, you are not asking a big enough question."

The masons who laid the foundation layer of European cathedrals that took centuries to build knew they would not see the final product of their work, but they knew they had to do very solid, precise work because of all the weight that was going to come on top of their work. That is the consciousness we need now.

We need to become good ancestors. We need to rediscover our spines and get up on our hind legs and struggle against the obstacles that we confront, so we can accelerate the transition to the green economy and not leave a burnt cinder of a planet for our great grandchildren.

 

 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: green economy

Dr. Kevin Danaher is a co-founder of Global Exchange and Executive Co-Producer of the Green Festivals. Alisa Gravitz is the Executive Director of Green America (formerly Co-op America) and Executive Co-Producer of the Green Festivals. They are co-editors of The Green Festival Reader: Fresh Ideas from Agents of Change.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What Has to Be Done for a Green Economy ... A New Banking System ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 22, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without a new banking system nothing changes. Nationalizing the banking system and using the profits to pay for the social and infrastructure investments we need.

The Federal Reserve System has been a complete failure. When not directly responsible for scandals, crises and bubbles they have jaw boned for policies that created them ... think : Alan Greenspan.

We need to replace this system with a Banking system run as a public utility whereby we the people, benefit directly from the creation of currency and the allocation of credit. As it stands now the banks garner almost all of the benefit of the leveraged interest they create. We have seen that they have abused this to the point that now we stand on the precipice of another Great Depression.

With a public central bank using a public utility model a much greater share of the profit can be made by the government while containing currency and credit creation so that it remains stable. A new Public Utility Bank can allocate currency and credit towards an economy that is both environmentally sustainable and economically just. Our current model rewards environmental degradation and thoughtless consumption based on a highest return model that accounts for neither the environment nor social responsibility labeling such concerns as externalities to their growth at any cost model.

The current banking system was developed for the expropriation of colonial wealth through slave labor. We need a new banking system designed for the 21st century that invests in people and restores our environment. A Public Central Bank can create currency and allocate credit based on sustainability and the Common Good while making a profit to offset costs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saving the World.....
Posted by: Mort D. Fame on Dec 22, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article.....the models are available in Storm Cunningham's new book called reWealth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All decorations and no solutions. Here's a better idea.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 22, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get rid of that phoney "war on drugs" and legalize HEMP. The fact that it can replace fossil fuels 100% speaks volumes. Until that gets done, all you'll be hearing is green washing !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Insulate your home
Posted by: kjmilow on Dec 22, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the most effective green strategies would be to give each homeowner & renter $2,500 to be used only for insulation. This would decrease the need for more CO2 producing heat or electric generation.
Very soon we will all have to be colder( or hotter in the South), darker( less wasteful lighting) and travel alot less. The road to a sustainable planet will not be as groovy as some think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Insulate your home Posted by: Kathy-B
» "Give Them?? Posted by: gellero1
Externals
Posted by: benzene on Dec 22, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fastest way there: LANDFILL TAX.

Tax corporations that actually make things and levy similar tariffs on imported goods on the volume and hazard of their product at the end of its life cycle. Give tax breaks for carbon neutrality and biodegradability. Landfills are a huge municipal expense and doing this would discourage their use. Simply put: make the producing corporations pay for the state to store their wasted products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why It is Crucial
Posted by: Gravitas on Dec 22, 2008 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is yet another sociological reason why we should all go green. In times of rapid change and social breakdown, what sociologists call anomie, prejudice can intensify to extremely ugly levels. Sociologist Kai Erikson explained the witchhunts in terms of social breakdown. When society can no longer hold people together, sometimes they invent a deviant or persecute an already marginalized group as a way of providing temporary unity. Think of it this way. You could be fighting bitterly with your loved one, but let an outsider come and criticize them and all of a sudden you and your loved one are united and the outsider becomes the new enemy. This also happens at a social level. Persecuting the "deviant" temporarily pulls people together. We are already seeing a rise in anti-Semitism. Gay people are becoming further marginalized. Or course Pharma is stooping to new lows to demonize fat people to sell its poison pills, scapegoating them in the process.

BUT, WHAT IF instead of turning on each other, we rallied around saving the planet? The deviance scares of the past operated with extreme force and resulted in horrifying consequences. What if we used the dynamics to save ourselves instead??? Perhaps the intensity of a deviance scare is the only thing that can save us. It may happen anyway. Lets make it positive instead of destructive!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want a new inventing system
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 22, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now, the Bush administration would give $100 Billion to Bank of America for energy efficiency research. Bank of America doesn't actually know squat about energy efficiency, but they enjoy money in general for strategic acquisitions and to pay executives bonuses and what was the topic again?

I want inventing majors in college. Not just entrepreneurship, inventing. The world already has plenty of businesspeople.

I want high schools to be interested in the creativity of their brighter students, not in the skill and drill genius test scores of their laggards. Very few of the laggards are going on to use geometry in their lives.

I want government-controlled quasi-corporations to give meritorious but poor inventors free or cheap office rent, staff time in the machine shop, competent patent law advice, and a food and rent stipend for survival (it's a job and a half!), in exchange for development rights and a cut of the eventual proceeds, if any. I especially want to see energy efficiency inventions and inventions that affect global warming in other ways. In particular, the transit and geoengineering fields of invention are currently starved to death. Our national goal should be, instead of bailing out the incompetent, bailing in the competent, at a small loss if necessary but sometimes at a small profit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That'd be cool Posted by: benzene
Put Jobs Where People Live ...
Posted by: halg on Dec 22, 2008 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, once again, I repeat my rant because few seem to acknowledge it. Sorry for those who have already heard it.

We need the federal government to pay (yes pay!) cities to re-industrialize. My approach is for every city or town to submit a 50 year plan for re-configuring itself so that industry is located at the CENTER of its geography, or subcenters depending on how large the municipality is. These must be co-ops owned by the people living there; people who move away must accept that they are no longer owners, but will become owners in their new community. There would be no such thing as "corporations,' and its related structure of "limited liability" a horrible idea in concept and practice as they are violent and deprive people of their most basic needs.

For one thing, less commutation equals less energy wasted. For another, people's needs would be addressed, and we could finally get away from feeding the insatiable financial mandibles of the elite few who have up until now controlled everything and everyone. We can still have social order, it's just that individual, smaller communities will get to decide just what that will be, not self-appointed regulators of public morality.

I am talking about REAL industry, not support industry. We could be making clothing, food, and everyday products we need right in our own towns. If one city's output were too much, perhaps they could sell their overproduction to another city or two, and IMMEDIATELY cease making any more of it until demand comes back.

One other thing: Get rid of the word "government" and replace it with something I call the "servicement" -- government is an old notion dating back past the dark ages. We don't need this "we-them" system of control and deprivation. Servicement would represent the community, and nothing more, and would be there to promote the general welfare, which is actually a uniquely American phrase if there ever was one! This idea could be extended all over the planet, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Almost Posted by: benzene
» Please tell us... Posted by: gellero1
» RE: Please tell us... Posted by: benzene
» RE: Almost Posted by: halg
You can make clothing??
Posted by: gellero1 on Dec 22, 2008 6:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you serious? Can you make clothes for the same renumeration they get in China and Pakistan??

Of course not.

The Soviets tried your plan....it didn't work very well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement