Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

The Frightening New Evidence Scientists Have Just Learned About Global Warming

By Steve Connor, Independent UK. Posted January 13, 2009.


New evidence shows that the arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world, a decade before it was predicted.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Scientists have found the first unequivocal evidence that the Arctic region is warming at a faster rate than the rest of the world at least a decade before it was predicted to happen.

Climate-change researchers have found that air temperatures in the region are higher than would be normally expected during the autumn because the increased melting of the summer Arctic sea ice is accumulating heat in the ocean. The phenomenon, known as Arctic amplification, was not expected to be seen for at least another 10 or 15 years and the findings will further raise concerns that the Arctic has already passed the climatic tipping-point towards ice-free summers, beyond which it may not recover.

The Arctic is considered one of the most sensitive regions in terms of climate change and its transition to another climatic state will have a direct impact on other parts of the northern hemisphere, as well more indirect effects around the world.

Although researchers have documented a catastrophic loss of sea ice during the summer months over the past 20 years, they have not until now detected the definitive temperature signal that they could link with greenhouse-gas emissions.

However, in a study to be presented later today to the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, scientists will show that Arctic amplification has been under way for the past five years, and it will continue to intensify Arctic warming for the foreseeable future.

Computer models of the global climate have for years suggested the Arctic will warm at a faster rate than the rest of the world due to Arctic amplification but many scientists believed this effect would only become measurable in the coming decades.

However, a study by scientists from the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Colorado has found that amplification is already showing up as a marked increase in surface air temperatures within the Arctic region during the autumn period, when the sea ice begins to reform after the summer melting period.

Julienne Stroeve, of the NSIDC, who led the study with her colleague Mark Serreze, said that autumn air temperatures this year and in recent years have been anomalously high. The Arctic Ocean warmed more than usual because heat from the sun was absorbed more easily by the dark areas of open water compared to the highly reflective surface of a frozen sea. "Autumn 2008 saw very strong surface temperature anomalies over the areas where the sea ice was lost," Dr Stroeve told The Independent ahead of her presentation today.

"The observed autumn warming that we've seen over the Arctic Ocean, not just this year but over the past five years or so, represents Arctic amplification, the notion that rises in surface air temperatures in response to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations will be larger in the Arctic than elsewhere over the globe," she said. "The warming climate is leading to more open water in the Arctic Ocean. As these open water areas develop through spring and summer, they absorb most of the sun's energy, leading to ocean warming.

"In autumn, as the sun sets in the Arctic, most of the heat that was gained in the ocean during summer is released back to the atmosphere, acting to warm the atmosphere. It is this heat-release back to the atmosphere that gives us Arctic amplification."

Temperature readings for this October were significantly higher than normal across the entire Arctic region – between 3C and 5C above average – but some areas were dramatically higher. In the Beaufort Sea, north of Alaska, for instance, near-surface air temperatures were more than 7C higher than normal for this time of year. The scientists believe the only reasonable explanation for such high autumn readings is that the ocean heat accumulated during the summer because of the loss of sea ice is being released back into the atmosphere from the sea before winter sea ice has chance to reform.

"One of the reasons we focus on Arctic amplification is that it is a good test of greenhouse warming theory. Even our earliest climate models were telling us that we should see this Arctic amplification emerge as we lose the summer ice cover," Dr Stroeve said. "This is exactly what we are not starting to see in the observations. Simply put, it's a case of we hate to say we told you so, but we did," she added.

Computer models have also predicted totally ice-free summers in the Arctic by 2070, but many scientists now believe that the first ice-free summer could occur far earlier than this, perhaps within the next 20 years.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, arctic

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Damn.
Posted by: StoneRiley on Jan 13, 2009 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Damn. Damn. Damn.

-Stone Riley www.stoneriley.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

too bad
Posted by: edgar1 on Jan 13, 2009 6:31 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the last ten years now have been shown to show a cooling trend. Sigh. Even the global warming industry, out of which some struggling progressives like Al Gore hoped to make a buck or two, is going as bankrupt as a bernie madoff get rich quick hedge fund. Invest in foot warmers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: too bad Posted by: EinMD
thought this article was going to be about this
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jan 13, 2009 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new danish study. if, as the linked article suggests, magnetic shift plays a major role in climate change, wouldn't we see those changes earlier and more dramatically at the poles? hmm...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This continues the trend of Global Warming escalating faster than our estimates
Posted by: PaulC on Jan 13, 2009 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A study done a couple of years ago looked at all of the studies and computer models studying global warming to see if their was a trend. They found that scientists were consistently underestimating global warming.

This study continues that trend.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cccccccccccold Posted by: edgar1
» ssssssssstupid troll Posted by: PaulC
Ice free yes, but for just a moment
Posted by: Earl E on Jan 14, 2009 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the article it is stated that if the Arctic becomes ice free, it may not recover.

Without a doubt, it will recover. But the question is how long will it take?

Once we move into a warmer, or tropical climate worldwide, at some point natural variation will take us back into a glacial epoch as it has done many times before.

If we somehow knew how long that would be it could help us develop the right technologies to survive this warming.

You see, if the warming gets bad enough, the only technology that will help us survive may be space migration.

Space technology is capital intensive and only available as an option when the collective intelligence sees its inevitability and has the economic and industrial capacity to generate it.

Imagine how hard it would have been for Romans or Pharohs to survive during century long droughts and planetwide desertification.

Were not there yet, but if we lose our high technology capacity, we lose the ability to keep that Ace in our pocket.

The smartest thing to do right now is become highly energy sensitive, efficient, and clean through intense investments in education, high technological projects and incredible breadth of development in alternative methodologies and practices.

Everyone talks about biodiversity but forgets that when the planet becomes uninhabitable, technodiversity will be our only salvation.

Skynet, in the Sarah Conner Chronicles, is more a prophetic concept than a badly written science fiction TV show.

It isn't just a coincidence that intelligence evolved this TV show right now. Your subconscious is talking to you through every aspect of your society.

You might want to pay attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go again
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Jan 19, 2009 2:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sky is not falling. There is nothing abnormal about our climate. The arctic melts, the arctic refreezes at a record pace. There is a long history of both, and both are happening now. They pretty much restated the obvious, missing half of the truth. At one point there was boreal forest up there.

Al Gore and Hansen are full of shit and getting rich off of it, and most of the people that support them are grant-getters who's money dries up if they tell the truth, or otherwise have fingers in the pie.

I also want to point out that the global warming hucksters hold up one area or anecdote as proof of warming, but won't accept that as an argument against their sham. The arctic might open up 5% more this decade, but we are almost at double the normal snowfall and seeing -30 nights here 1,000 miles south. I love that global warming conferences are frequently seeing inclimate weather, it is much to my delight.

You also might want to note that we are heading into the gut of a solar minimum that could shape up like Maunder or Dalton. We are PDO negative, mild La Nina, and the Milankovitch cycle says that our interglacial is about over..

If you want to worry about global warming, you might want to figure out how to make it happen really fast. In the Younger Dryas stadial, it went from interglacial to ice age in less than a decade.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok-ice-core-petit.png

I am all for a cleaner world, but don't bullshit your way there. The public will rebel and the backlash will defeat the gains.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]