Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Why Michael Pollan Doesn't Want to Be Secretary of Agriculture

By Michael Winship, AlterNet. Posted December 11, 2008.


The writer is not biting at an Internet-fueled citizen's movement to draft him for the cabinet post, but he does have some suggestions.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Writer and activist Michael Pollan has no interest in becoming President-elect Barack Obama's secretary of agriculture, thank you very much, even though there are a lot of people who think he'd be perfect for the job.

Pollan disagrees. Laughing, he told my colleague Bill Moyers on the latest edition of public television's Bill Moyers Journal, "I have an understanding of my strengths and limitations ... I don't want this job," then he turned serious as he added, "What Obama needs to do, if he indeed wants to make change in this area -- and that isn't clear yet that he does, at least in his first term -- I think we need a food-policy czar in the White House because the challenge is not just what we do with agriculture, it's connecting the dots between agriculture and public health, between agriculture and energy and climate change, agriculture and education."

There's been an Internet-fueled citizen's movement to draft Pollan for the cabinet post. As the author of countless articles and such books as The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals and In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto, his thorough reporting, literally getting his hands dirty working on American farms and writing about it, has made him one of our country's greatest experts on how and what we eat.

In an open letter to whoever would become our next president -- or "Farmer in Chief," as he put it in the Oct. 12 New York Times Magazine -- Pollan wrote: "It may surprise you to learn that among the issues that will occupy much of your time in the coming years is one you barely mentioned during the campaign: food. Food policy is not something American presidents have had to give much thought to, at least since the Nixon administration -- the last time high food prices presented a serious political peril...

"But with a suddenness that has taken us all by surprise, the era of cheap and abundant food appears to be drawing to a close. What this means is that you, like so many other leaders through history, will find yourself confronting the fact -- so easy to overlook these past few years -- that the health of a nation's food system is a critical issue of national security. Food is about to demand your attention."

In 2007, before the financial meltdown had even struck, some 32 million Americans -- at least 1 in 9 households -- had trouble putting enough food on the table. Now, according to the Wall Street Journal, food banks across the country are struggling to meet a surge of people uncertain about their next meal. They've seen a 20 percent increase in demand -- middle-class families, they say, account for most of the growth.

And the day before our annual Thanksgiving binge, the Washington Post reported, "The number of Americans on food stamps is poised to exceed 30 million for the first time this month, surpassing the historic high set in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, food, michael pollan

Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday night on PBS.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
In case you missed it
Posted by: jbro434 on Dec 11, 2008 1:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was an excellent interview with Bill Moyers a few weeks ago.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/11282008/profile2.html
I was amazed at how much food we could grow when I was a kid. We had a small yard and used about a 10x20 ft plot to grow our veggies.
As an adult, I started a garden when I got my first house. I learned a lot through trial and error and each year my yield improved. I bought a tomato yesterday at the store and not only did it taste like crap, I am sure that the nutritional value is inferior to in-season, organic varieties. I also joined a CSA that grew organic produce that I did not have room for to supplement my own crop. I had read somewhere that one reason some people over eat is that the food they consume has so little nutritional value that their bodies are craving the vitamins and minerals that the food is void of. Thus, they just keep eating. Food for thought, I suppose.
It is really exciting to see unused land in urban environments being converted into micro farms. It would be great to see farm support shifted to some of these projects instead of going to giant agribusiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America's Past, Present and Future under Fascist Food Control
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Dec 11, 2008 1:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government has been standing guard for corporate control of food and medicine in America for half a century. We've now reached the point where people cannot grow food on their own property or organize to get the kind of healthy food they want to be healthy.

The shocking events that took place last week in Ohio gives us a picture of just how horrifice the situation is. Under Obomba, this kind of thing will increase exponentially.

SWAT Team Like Raid by Ohio authorities on a farm house in LaGange, Ohio http://tinyurl.com/59fxfb

Ohio authorities stormed a farm house in LaGange Monday, December 1, to execute a search warrant, holding the Jacqueline and John Stowers and their son and young grandchildren at gunpoint for nine hours. During the raid the Ohio Department of Agriculture and police confiscated over ten thousand dollars worth of food, computers and cell phones. The Stowers’ crime? They run a private, members-only food co-op.

While state authorities were looking for evidence of illegal activities, the family was not informed what crime they were suspected of, they were not read their rights or allowed to make a phone call. The children, some as young as toddlers, were traumatized by armed officers interrogating the adults with guns drawn.

The Morning Journal, a newspaper serving northern Ohio, reported that the Stowers were believed to be operating without a license. However, the Stowers claim that the food co-op they run does not engage in any activities that would require state licensing.

Friends of the Stowers openly question why such aggressive tactics were necessary to investigate a licensing complaint.

The Ohio Department of Agriculture has apparently been chastised by the courts in previous cases for over-reach, including entrapment of an Amish man to sell raw milk, which backfired, when it became known that the man gave milk instead of selling it to a state undercover agent, refusing to take money for what he believed to be a charitable act. The Amish literally interpret the Gospel of Matthew (5:42) to “give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.”

The matter has been forwarded to the Lorain County Prosecutor’s Office and the Lorain County General Health District according to Lorain County court records.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice Website! Posted by: BobKincaid
» RE: Legitimate News Story Posted by: oregoncharles
This is sad.
Posted by: pangolin on Dec 11, 2008 2:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I write this there are hundreds and hundreds of comments concerning the future of the auto industry and only a few comments about the future of our food supply.

I'm pretty sure our food supply is a bit more important and a LOT more vulnerable to climate change and ecological disruption.

As I write this the Sierra snowpack which usually supplies water to crops that feed millions of people is non-existent. No snow on those mountains and somebody starves.

Is there anybody else out there that gets that famine IS a possibility in the US??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

response to this is sad
Posted by: Shey on Dec 11, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, there are a growing number of people who are aware of not only the possibility of famine due to climate change, but the multi-faceted issue that is the politics of food, in general.
If you want the Obama administration to become more aware of your specific issues in this area, go to the transition teams website, Change.gov, and make your voice heard.
Judging from the Obama quote in this article (on pg. 2), the President-elect is just becoming aware of the immensity of issues such as crop subsidies to agri-business "farms" that earn way more than the legal cutoff point for such subsidies.

This article was just posted, hopefully there will be more comments. AlterNet has been a wonderful forum for Michael Pollan and the awareness of a whole new way of looking at food issues, that he represents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The view from a farmer
Posted by: zooeyhall on Dec 11, 2008 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a farmer in Nebraska (53 years). I want to state that having a Secretary of Agriculture is an anachromism. It is a hold-over from 19th century and the days when there were four farms on every section.

I feel it would be far better today to have a "Secretary of Natural Resources" who would handle forests, mining, fishing, and also agriculture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The view from a farmer Posted by: BobKincaid
» RE: The view from a farmer Posted by: ecoalex
» RE: The view from a farmer Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Wrong timing. Posted by: oregoncharles
Obama supports Big Agri and King Corn so guess who he's bound to pick?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 11, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another Big Agri puppet !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Write to him! Posted by: oregoncharles
Every Day Tons Of Food are sent to landfills
Posted by: jbowen43 on Dec 11, 2008 1:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The surplus bakeries alone give away thousands of loaves of bread to livestock producers for feed or send them to landfills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Secretary Michal Pollan?
Posted by: hartsmart on Dec 11, 2008 1:59 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Food and health America--- mired in utter confusion, helped by the machinations of the USDA. (Food subsidies in the forefront).
No wonder Michael Pollan refuses to be caught in a no-win job. Can you image--Michael as King Corn?
He is a brilliant writer with a grasp of food and its health relationship.
Not that I agree with his food choices. As an omnivore, leaning towards pronounced carnivorousness especially in winter and spring, I avoid masses of greens and grains, stuff to fatten animals. Feed the goat, fry it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Misleading
Posted by: pzaudke on Dec 15, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Contrast this with the big bucks being shelled out in the recent $307 billion farm bill, much of it going to massive agribusinesses"

This is a misleading statement. More than two thirds of the farm bill's budget (75% by some estimates) is dedicated to nutrition programs like Food Stamps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]