Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environment

Bank of America Retreats from Financing Destructive Mountaintop-Removal Mining

By Michael Brune, AlterNet. Posted December 4, 2008.


The bank's new policy is a financial blow to the coal industry and a big win for enviros.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

After all the bad news about mountaintop removal, how about a little success?

Yesterday, Bank of America, a lead financier of coal, announced that it will be phasing out financing for companies that practice mountaintop-removal coal mining, a highly destructive and controversial method of coal extraction. The policy is a financial blow to the coal industry just as the Environmental Protection Agency -- at the behest of the Bush administration -- approved a rule that will make it easier for coal companies to dump into streams and valleys the waste from mountaintop-removal mining operations.

Bank of America's decision is a giant leap forward in the fight against mountaintop removal, which has devastated Appalachian communities and the mountains and streams they depend on. The decision is also a testament to the hard work of Appalachian communities and anti-coal activists across the country, whose collective pressure left Bank of America with little choice but to abandon its support for this barbaric form of resource extraction.

There is a powerful coal movement in this country, and we are winning!

The new policy states: "Bank of America is particularly concerned about surface mining conducted through mountaintop removal in locations such as central Appalachia. We therefore will phase out financing of companies whose predominant method of extracting coal is through mountaintop removal. While we acknowledge that surface mining is economically efficient and creates jobs, it can be conducted in a way that minimizes environmental impacts in certain geographies."

At Rainforest Action Network, we -- along with Appalachian allies and grassroots activists -- have been pressuring Bank of America since October 2007 to cease financing of mountaintop-removal mining and coal-fired power plants. This policy is a critical step in the right direction and a challenge to Citi, JP Morgan Chase and other banks to similarly take responsibility for the social and environmental impacts of their financing.

Until now, Bank of America has been involved with eight of the United States' top mountaintop-removal coal-mining operators, which collectively produce more than 250 million tons of coal each year. Mountaintop removal flattens mountain ranges and transforms healthy mountain woodlands into toxic sludge that has clogged more than 700 miles of rivers and streams.

In the coming weeks, it will be crucial that Bank of America puts its money where its mouth is. The devil is, of course, in the details with this policy, and Bank of America needs to issue a timeline for the phasing out of its financing and provide further explanation of what will and will not continue to be financed. This will only be a victory when we see change on the ground.

On a larger scale, banks hold the purse strings for the coal industry and have tremendous influence in determining whether we continue to allow these companies to destroy our climate and communities or whether we start to fund the future with a Green New Deal that revolutionizes our energy economy. This is a small taste of the role responsible banks could play in mitigating the climate crisis.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: coal, coal mining, mtr

Michael Brune is the executive director of Rainforest Action Network.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
About time!
Posted by: Lauren on Dec 5, 2008 1:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So they are going to START doing the right thing, how responsible are they going to be for the damage they already financed?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just keep reminding the banks of the following:
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 5, 2008 10:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coal is mostly carbon, but the complete list of impurities in coal includes every
element in the periodic table. The major impurities are, depending on where
you found it: URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt,
Nickel, Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron, Sulfur,
Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium, Manganese, Vanadium,
Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium, Molybdenum and Zinc. Coal smoke and
cinders are commercially viable ORE for the above elements. Chinese industrial
grade coal contains much more arsenic than American coal. Chinese industrial
grade coal is sometimes stolen by peasants for cooking. The result is that the
whole family dies of arsenic poisoning. Coal varies a lot. You have to analyze
it not only mine by mine but even lump by lump. Coal is a rock. It comes out
of the ground. What would you expect of a rock? Coal also contains organics.
When they dump overburden, it inevitably contains "stony coal," by which I mean
a combination of ordinary rock and coal.
Reference:
OUR NUCLEAR FUTURE:
THE PATH OF SELECTIVE IGNORANCE
by Alex Gabbard
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, TN
Selections from the 19th Annual Conference
SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
March 14,15,16, 1996
Nashville, Tennessee

Published by the
SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
1996
Edited by Jack D. Arters, Ed.D.
Conference Director
The truth is, all natural rocks contain most natural elements. Coal is a rock.
The average concentration of uranium in coal is 1 or 2 parts per million. Illinois
coal contains up to 103 parts per million uranium. A 1000 million watt coal
fired power plant burns 4 million tons of coal each year. If you multiply 4
million tons by 1 part per million, you get 4 tons of uranium. Most of that is
U238. About .7% is U235. 4 tons = 8000 pounds. 8000 pounds times .7% =
56 pounds of U235. An average 1000 million watt coal fired power plant puts
out 56 to 112 pounds of U235 every year. There are only 2 places the uranium
can go: Up the stack or into the cinders.
Since a reactor full fuel load is around 11 tons of 2% U235 and 98% U238, and
one load lasts about 10 years, and what one coal fired power plant puts into the
air and cinders fully fuels a nuclear power plant.
Compare 4 Million tons per year with 1.1 tons per year. 1.1 divided by 4 Million
= 2.75 E -7 = .000000275 =.0000275%. Remember that only 2% of that is
U235. The nuclear power plant needs ~44 pounds of U235 per year. The coal
fired power plant burns coal by the trainload. The nuclear power plant consumes
U235 in such small quantities yearly that you could carry that much weight in a
briefcase. The full fuel load and the years between fueling varies from reactor to
reactor, but one truck can carry the weight of a full nuclear fuel load.
See also: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review
and
ORNLReview2

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every now and then
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Dec 9, 2008 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
something happens to make you believe that keeping up with your pet issues, writing letters and participating in online petitions will actually get the result you want. Yay!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get it right.
Posted by: weatherking on Dec 14, 2008 10:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you BoA. Now if the other purse holders would join in and form a conciencious cabal to lessen the destruction of natural beauty and necessary water purity, the people who provide you with income will flock to your doors. These are not stupid peasants whom you are messing up with bad practices, but buyers of your stock and the voters of your constituents to keep you in business. There is no such thing as "clean coal". The Bush administrations move to allow mountain top removal and rubble dispersal is ludicrous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement