Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Pigs with Mouse Genes: How GM Animals May Be Entering the Food Chain without Labeling

By Ari LeVaux, AlterNet. Posted October 30, 2008.


The FDA may be taking the public, and nature, down a dangerous path.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On September 18, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released guidance on a regulatory framework for approving the entrance of genetically modified (GM) animals into the nation's food supply. The term "guidance" is agency-speak for the law will look something like this. Put another way, the FDA has offered advice, considerably weaker than legally enforceable regulation. With the announcement, a 60-day period for public comment was opened.  

The only GM animal currently licensed for sale in the U.S. is the glow-in-the-dark zebra fish, a pet. With the exception of a few drunk frat boys, this fish is not expected to be consumed by humans, and its need for warm water precludes any possibility of it escaping into the wild. But the glowing zebra fish will soon have some GM company in stores near you.  

The new guidance is primarily directed at animals genetically modified for food-production purposes, but it's based on the approval process used for animals that are genetically modified for pharmacological purposes, such as pigs designed to grow human livers, or goats that produce insulin in their milk. Under the guidance, all GM animals, be they of the farm or pharma variety, will be classified as drugs.  

Technically, the drug is the bit of foreign DNA that's spliced into the animal's cells, and the FDA will grant or deny approval to just those bits of DNA, not to the whole organism. This creates a dangerous regulatory gray area, says Jaydee Hanson, a policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety, who calls this arrangement a "fiction."  

"The gene is in every cell of the animal, and regulating the animal is the only tool they have to control these genes, but they say they're only regulating the gene, not the animal," he says. "Drugs don't get loose and breed with each other. Animals do."  

As a case in point he mentions the "AquAdvantage" line of GM salmon created by Aqua Bounty Technologies of Waltham, Mass., in 2001. The regulated "drug" in this case is a gene that makes salmon secrete extra growth hormone, causing the fish to reach maturity in 18 months instead of 30.  

Should any of these fish escape into the wild, they would take their recombinant genes with them, posing unknown -- and therefore, Hanson says, unacceptable -- risk to wild salmon stocks and the ecosystems they inhabit.  

It's rumored that AquAdvantage salmon will be the first GM food animal approved for sale by the FDA. Meanwhile, a growing number of GM animals are being developed for the food market, says Hanson, and given this fact he thinks an approval process is long overdue. But while steps toward the creation of a regulatory framework for GM food animals are steps in the right direction, he says the FDA's guidance as currently written leaves much to be desired.  


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: genetically modified, fda, gm, cloning, labeling, gm animals

Ari LeVaux writes a syndicated weekly food column.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The answer is very simple -->
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 31, 2008 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop eating meat and it won't be a problem for you. If enough people stop, genetic engineering of animals for food will close down because of too few customers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what is the URL for posting comments to the FDA already?
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Nov 2, 2008 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ari LeVaux, how did you manage to forget to tell us the FDA comments URL?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First article I've seen on Alternet on GMO food
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Nov 4, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I haven't been reading regularly for long. The easing of GMO plants and animals into the world is a matter of secrecy until it's done, when the genie can't be put back in the bottle, then shouting down any objections, and buying the FDA stamp of approval. I wish I could believe that Obama cared anything about it, but he doesn't. Former Monsanto ally and secretary of agriculture Ann Veneman was one of the people he considered as his running mate. I've never heard him talk about the mutilation of earth's genetic heritage once in his campaign. Nader has! Here's a link: www.votenader.org/issues/market/agriculture/#47089

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ignorance takes many forms
Posted by: Jim Swanson on Nov 4, 2008 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It must be because the US ranks about 25th in science education that an editor let this piece of non-reality based reporting get posted on Alternet.
Genetic modification occurs all the time and to all organisms. We are constantly being modified by our fellow life forms and our environment. Nothing these scientists modify is in any way materially different. For a dose of reality on these issues read Dick Taverne's The March of Unreason.
Is even Alternet ruled by religious ignorance? (I am using the term religious to refer to any non-reality based belief system.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]