Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Ecotourism: Responsible Travel or Marketing Sham?

By Richard Hammond, The Guardian. Posted March 29, 2007.


As green travel has become big business, it has sparked a rise in faux ecotourism. Who's scamming, who's legit and how do we tell the difference?
Advertisement

"You have to see it to Belize it" was scrawled across the T-shirts I saw hung on a roadside stall in Belize City a decade ago. Belize's barrier reef -- the second largest in the world -- had just been enlisted as a world heritage site and the country was gearing up for a surge in tourism. Ten years on, Belize now vies with Costa Rica as the ecotourism capital of central America.

Its success reflects a growing trend for travel that puts something back into the environment and local communities. Britain's buoyant green pound is sustaining a green travel market worth £409m and it is set to grow by 25 percent a year, according to a recent report by market research analyst Mintel.

Yet there is currently no single internationally accepted standard for green tourism. Holidaymakers have to grapple with over 350 independent eco-labels, most of which are designed as a checklist for the industry, rather than as a searchable tool for travellers. Many assess only on environmental credentials so they don't provide any guarantee of quality, and none are held to account by one internationally accepted accreditation body so you can't compare like with like.

And not all eco-holidays are everything they're cracked up to be. The popular South American ecotourism website planeta.com cites John Noble, editor of Lonely Planet's Mexico guidebook, who said, "What you call 'ecotourism' in Latin America, in Europe we call a 'walk in the country'."

Others take a harsher line, labelling faux ecotourism "greenwashing." And it's hardly something new. During the United Nations' International Year of Ecotourism in 2002, Patricia Barnett of Tourism Concern said the ecotourism label could be "used by anyone at anytime for anything from a small-scale locally-run rainforest lodge where the money goes to support a local community, to a large, luxury, foreign-owned resort which has little community involvement and uses masses of natural resources".

The hijacking of the "eco" label by tourism businesses riding cheaply on the green wave means that nowadays you're unlikely to see the word ecotourism used in British tour operators' brochures. Harold Goodwin, professor of responsible tourism management at Leeds Metropolitan University told me, "Ecotourism has no marketing utility because people just don't believe it anymore."

Greenwashing comes in various guises. In some cases it can be little more than cheeky marketing -- a golf course claiming it is eco because a few swans live on a lake is par for the course in an industry that's obsessed with hype. But there is a more serious side to it, especially at the sharp end of poverty. Tourism Concern has campaigned for the last 15 years against some of the worst offenders, such as the eviction of the Maasai and Samburu people from their lands in east Africa in order to establish what the developers called "conservation and safari tourism."

But ecotourism -- and greenwashing -- are no longer confined to the central American rainforest or the African bush. Just as the green agenda has gone mainstream, from city breaks to summer holidays in the Med, so we start hearing about so-called eco-friendly spas that do little more than sell fair trade bananas in the bistro. This undermines the genuine article.

One of the champions of a more sustainable hotel industry is the hotel chain Scandic, which has refurbished over 10,000 eco-rooms with almost 100 percent recyclable material. Other hotels that are likewise going the extra mile to green up their operations do much more than asking guests to put their towels out for washing; often it involves a fundamental change to the way they run their business, through investing in more efficient technologies that minimise their use of electricity and water.

Is it really green?

So how can you distinguish between the green and the greenwash? Often a hotel's most efficacious environmental practices will go unnoticed to the casual eye of a holidaymaker -- and even the most motivated green traveller is unlikely to inspect a hotel's waste management system after ordering the morning paper.

Given the fact that 26 million holidays are booked through travel agents each year, you might think the travel industry would be the first port of call for guidance on where to book a green holiday. Yet there isn't one high street travel agent in the UK that specialises in eco-travel. Only specialist tour operators offer that kind of service, I was told by a spokesman for the Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA).

He was referring to the likes of alternative holiday specialist Sunvil, who for years have sold holidays that tread a more ethical line by taking visitors to places that help put something back into local communities. Sunvil is a member of the Association of Independent Tour Operators (AITO), which represents about 150 independently owned UK tour operators.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ecotourism

Richard Hammond is the editor of greentraveller.co.uk.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
great article
Posted by: jph on Mar 29, 2007 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given the size of the tourism juggernaut and its potential for disastrous effects in voice-less communities, this is an issue that deserves more attention. If you're interested in more information, I recommend Martha Honey's 1999 book "Ecotourism and Sustainable Development" for some fascinating case studies in Latin America and Africa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you flew to get there, it wasn't green
Posted by: Beck on Mar 29, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flying is the real addiction that Americans can't face losing. Driving has become an old, tired marriage. The real love affair, the one we're willing to compromise our own environmental standards over, is now with flying. And you can't "offset" the impact of your flight unless you were at zero emissions to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no eco-tourism
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 29, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no eco-tourism. There are less-impact vacations (A vegan yoga retreat in a simple ashram versus a vacation to Disneyland with lots of McDonalds food and Burger King meals) but there is no eco-tourism. If a plane or car is involved, it's not eco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agreed. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
And so...
Posted by: gjames on Mar 29, 2007 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you propose traveling from New York to San Francisco? Los Angeles to Tokyo? Boston to London?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree with gjames..... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: I agree with gjames..... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Fear not Posted by: eddie torres
» LOL!! Posted by: veggiegrrrl
There's only one kind of Green on Wall Street
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 29, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When a traveller from Generation Tribal pays for a cheap London-Goa airfare, people-who-own-airlines get cash.

People-who-own-airlines live on Wall Street and devise ways to install robot-CEO-machines like Dick Cheney in the US White House to rig deals for the Old 7-Sisters (Exxon, BP, Shell, Chevron).

So, how green is a dead Iraq? Pretty green for Dick Cheney's Euro accounts in Switzerland.

Party on the beach! We're so green! Don't forget to count your carbon!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

importance of environmental justice and localized self-determination
Posted by: profoflitandtrout on Mar 29, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was happy to read that the author, as someone involved in more ecologically aware tourism, at least briefly analyzes the issue of environmental and social justice for those who inhabit these destinations. However, as usual in the global North, this amounts to ensuring there is fair trade and that workers are paid a fair(?) wage. What it doesn't take into account is that these eco-tourist resorts and trips are imposed on the local populations more often than not (though local input is more often at least considered) and only take the local population into consideration secondarily, at best maximizing the compensation these peoples receive. Of course, this makes environmental justice subordinate to the inevitable development of their resources in ways not of their choosing. The WWF and WCS land preservation/preserve creation scheme has only recently added the input of local populations-- but if it comes down to it, Northern ambitions (and capital) determines if and how such land is regulated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

eco, schmeco
Posted by: DeAnander on Mar 29, 2007 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you get there by plane, it isn't eco-anything.

reminds me of Nicole Hollander's classic question, "Can I Be a Vegetarian and Still Eat Fried Chicken?"

we can't squander fossil fuels and dump CO2 and other combustion byproducts into the upper atmosphere and call it "green." air travel is one of the biggest threats to climate stability and a huge drain on fossil fuel reserves. in this case, as in many others, the journey counts for more than the destination...

walk there, sail there, take a train, ride a bike, and it might be "eco" tourism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CARBON NEUTRAL ???
Posted by: gellero on Mar 29, 2007 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't really understand what the fuss is about. If Al Gore can be 'carbon neutral' with his personal jet, why can't my coach class ticket?? I guess a latter day Marie Antionette would say 'let them ride bikes'. A good old fashioned style commie government like China's is what we need to keep the broad masses of the proletariat from bourgeoise values like personal automobiles, and keep them on socially responsible and carbon positive bicycles. POWER to the PEOPLE !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CARBON NEUTRAL ??? Posted by: richholland
Private Jets
Posted by: vertical on Apr 2, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to give up private jets. They should still be used for emergencies, but we should curtail their use for the Athletes, Celebreties and CEOs (ACCs) of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paper Research
Posted by: ChathamChick on Apr 3, 2007 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm writing a paper on Tourism and Eco-Tourism for my Social and Political Thought class and was glad to see this article as it comes at a great time to give me alternative insights. I'm focusing on the Caribbean and my thesis is that tourism is basically re-colonizing cultures and people that, sadly, have been colonized before. It's a difficult situation when these places, especially islands, can't compete in a free market global economy and have little choice but to sell out to the tourism industry. Their own governments jumped in headfirst at the first mention of making a profit. A very good book is Behind The Smile: The Working Lives of The Caribbean Tourism Industry.One of the most gripping stories was of a young anthropologist who took her little host sister to the beach was startled when the girl asked why they were going to the 'white people (tourist) beach?' How crazy is it that the beaches where these people used to bathe and wash their clothes are now reserved for rich white Americans and Europeans who can afford to kick people off their land...not much's changed apparently...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paper Research Posted by: freedomlover