Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Environment

Seize the Momentum

By Bill McKibben, Grist.org. Posted March 26, 2007.


Where does a new consensus come from? How does the zeitgeist suddenly start to shift?
Advertisement

Bill McKibben, an AlterNet guest columnist, is spearheading the Step It Up 2007 campaign. A scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College, McKibben's newest book is the forthcoming Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future. His column is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

Where does a new consensus come from? How does the zeitgeist suddenly start to shift?

When we started Step It Up 2007, all of 10 weeks ago, 80 percent cuts in carbon emissions by 2050 seemed at the very outer edge of the politically possible. A week ago, youth climate activist Courtney Fryxell, who is helping organize one of the Washington rallies for April 14, asked John Edwards point blank if he'd commit to 80 percent carbon cuts by 2050. "Yes," he said -- and with that earned himself real respect as the first of the major contenders out of the gate on this issue.

He won't, I think, be the last. Because what he was responding to was a surge in grassroots political activism all around this country. For instance, a few hours before Edwards talked, a group of intrepid religious climate activists in Massachusetts set off for a 10-day march to Boston -- it was enormous fun to applaud them as they left the church to start their journey because they symbolized the way that faith communities have come to this cause in the last year.

The next night in D.C., 800 people gathered for an evening organized by Mike Tidwell and Ted Glick, tireless activists from the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, who for five years have been holding much smaller gatherings, slowly building the movement. The huge throng, cheered by the music of Emma's Revolution, clearly sensed the turn in the weather. Meanwhile, Laurie David and Sheryl Crow are circling the country putting on shows; Al Gore just testified before Congress; everywhere the force is building.

For many years, speaking at one college or church or library after another, I'd tell people about global warming and they'd say: we can't break through the wall of special interest and inertia that keeps the solutions bottled up. And I'd say, that's right, we can't. Not yet. But eventually the day will come when events -- Hurricane Katrina -- provide an opening. And when that opening comes, we'll need every network, every plan, every small model to build on. So we'll be able to seize the moment.

That's what's happening. Across the country, people who have been working for years and people who have just started worrying about global warming are quickly joining forces. Step It Up is only the most dramatic example -- earlier this week we went past the 1,000-rally mark; April 14 is going to be one of the most dramatic days in American environmental history. People in every state will be raising their voices, and when that happens the power will help speed this new consensus into being.

The battle won't be easy, of course. But finally Exxon has some opponents they can't ignore. Momentum counts, and momentum all of a sudden is squarely on our side.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, stepitup2007, bill mckibben

Bill McKibben is the author of "The End of Nature" and "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What can I do ?
Posted by: Slmncty on Mar 26, 2007 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see many post with this question, on many different issues. A famous individual once stated "you don't have to do it all, just do what you can". That individual was John Denver. Not taking any action by believing you can't make a difference is a real problem!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 27, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... not going to solve the problem. Industrialism is still never going to be sustainable. You may get carbon emissions down, but that only begins to address one small part of a very large problem that no technofix can ever cure because it is a symptom of every technofix we have ever had.

If you don't address industrialism and consumerism you aren't going to do much of anything to make the world more livable... you're just going to desperately try to cling to the status quo no matter how bad everything around you gets.

Our environment is being greatly harmed by our culture, which is incredibly and obscenely ill. Its no great wonder the posterboy of this whole movement is Al Gore... a mainstream politician... a representative of the same system that got us to where we are today.

www.greenanarchy.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zeitgeist shift scheme, wrestling character-based
Posted by: pspinrad on Mar 27, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gods of any belief system become the devils of the belief system that supplants it (as John Gregory Bourke observed).

Also, people traditionally learn their cultural identity, history, and mythology through character-based costume dances, events, pageants -- particularly in oral cultures, but among literate people as well.

SO, I propose two new World Wrestling Entertainment superstars who embody an emerging new environmental consciousness:

Green Eagle is a strong, silent Native American type. He travels in a biodiesel-powered bus, prays and kisses the earth before every match, snacks on locally-grown produce between rounds (honoring the local farmers, organic where possible), and drinks tap water from a reusable canteen that's covered with stickers from a carefully-chosen set of environmental organizations, including the Nature Conservancy and the Evangelical Environmental Network.

Max Waste is a hot-headed brat who revels in "wasting" everything-- especially his opponents. He dresses in a post-apocalyptic "Mad Max" getup, travels in a ridiculous SUV-looking van (and boasts about its low mileage), is covered with soot and weird lesions (simulated with make-up), brags about eating toxins and poison, and chomps on artificially-colored, packaged snack foods like Flamin' Hot Cheetos between rounds, littering the ring with the wrappers.

Max Waste might become the more popular wrestling superstar of the two, but that's totally fine-- the lesson is still there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow, Bill..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 28, 2007 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... there really doesn't seem to be all that much momentum around here for your movement to seize.

At least you are trying to do something... but really... there is so much you aren't addressing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the Jobs Stupid
Posted by: edith on Mar 31, 2007 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
80% is just a number that is bigger than 20%. Of course idealists will support the biggest possible reduction in carbon emissions. Wait until Edwards or someone in a speech uses the number and an opponent or the Republicans ask the inevitable question: How many jobs will that cost? Any answer that no jobs will be cost, that building new solar panels or some new eco product will offset income and job losses from significantly higher energy costs and inflation driven by energy price hikes will be seen as a thin response to what average people worry about more than global warming: where's my next check coming from and is it enough to pay the credit card and food bills.

Middlebury is a great school, bill mckibben, but it isn't the real world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My problem with this is... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Most people
Posted by: samba on Apr 3, 2007 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone said "Most people don't care to sacrifice". I don't actually know most people,and doubt the writer does either. But I think they're more afraid of giving up the comfort of what's familiar than they are of sacrifice. Working people sacrifice half their waking lives to working for someone else so they can have enough money to buy all this consumer junk that ends up in land fills. Ever go to the dump and see what gets tossed? People could give up spending money on a lot of stuff they don't need,eat better food that keeps them healthy and more able to enjoy themselves. The idea that people have this wonderful rich life that they'd have to give up to stop destroying the planet is an illusion.Stand by a commuter route and watch people in rush hour traffic ,then tell me consumerism is a wonderfully happy life. But trying to tell peoplet hey can be happier living simpler is really difficult. I suggest to you who consider yourselves activists: Rallies and demonstrations are not effective,grass roots organizing -going door to door is still the most effective poitical action. Unless you have enough money to buy a politician outright.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]