Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Will 'Green' Building Be the Future of New Orleans?

By Kellie Lunney, The American Prospect. Posted February 8, 2007.


There is no shortage of "green" plans for rebuilding New Orleans. But what does sustainability mean to people without a roof over their heads?
Advertisement

This article is reprinted from the American Prospect.

Back in November 2005, barely three months after Hurricane Katrina, the Washington, D.C.-based Urban Land Institute presented its recommendations for rebuilding a post-apocalyptic New Orleans. One recommendation called for shrinking the city footprint, envisioning new, protected green space in areas deemed unsuitable for rebuilding. With emotions still raw, a city wracked by poverty and racism lashed out at what it perceived as another slap in the face. The public soundly rejected the idea, and so ultimately did Mayor Ray Nagin, who was re-elected a few months later.

"They presented to the public the plan, with giant green dots that said future park land," says Jennifer Zell, a graduate student in landscape architecture at Louisiana State University. "People thought, 'They are going to bulldoze this whole place and turn it into swampland.' People wanted to rebuild." But despite this setback, Zell believes that a strategy for sustainable development is one of the things that will save the city.

There's a green cast to virtually every plan to rebuild New Orleans, and an army of planners, affordable housing groups, environmentalists, and government officials hopes to make it happen. Several of these organizations, including Enterprise and Global Green USA, have partnered on various efforts.

But given the political infighting between the state of Louisiana and city of New Orleans, the slow pace of federal housing assistance and insurance settlements, and overall planning fatigue, the rallying cry for green is a little hard to hear -- even for those who are otherwise receptive. Says John Knott, a sustainable developer and president of the Noisette Co. in South Carolina, of rebuilding in New Orleans, "If people can't meet basic needs of housing and jobs, it's hard to get them to think about tomorrow."

Quite so. It's more than a little ironic that a diffuse army of planners is seeing New Orleans as an opportunity to promote sustainable development, at a time when more than two-thirds of the city's onetime residents are more concerned about having an affordable roof over their heads -- one that will not blow away in the next big storm. To most locals, "sustainable" has more to do with making sure the levees hold than with energy-efficient buildings or a new urbanism.

Affordable New Orleans

Pre-Katrina New Orleans was already a kind of new urbanist city for the working poor. It had relatively high density, affordable prices, one of the nation's best ratios of income to housing costs, and an above-average rate of homeownership among African Americans, as well as fine parks and a decent system of public transportation -- the key elements of the new-urban formula.

Indeed, as the nation witnessed the tragedy of people trapped in the flooding city, one big reason why more residents could not get out was that nearly 35 percent of black households owned no cars, and relied instead on buses and trolleys.

Post-Katrina, tens of thousands of residents want to rebuild flood-damaged homes that are not fit for habitation but that could be reclaimed. The federal government has allocated $10.4 billion in block grants to Louisiana but the money has been slow getting to people because of red tape and control over purse strings.

At every level, the government has been bogged down in its own bureaucracy, while mold slowly ruins tens of thousands of homes that might be saved, and homeowners live in government-provided trailers parked in the front yards of their rotting houses. Only a fraction of flood-damaged homes have been repaired and re-occupied, fully a year and a half after Katrina hit.

So while New Orleans could be a model of green redevelopment, it remains a swamp of mold and frustrated hopes.

Small Successes

Still, the small successes suggest what might be achieved at a larger scale. Among the groups that are working to produce affordable green housing for the New Orleans area are Habitat for Humanity International, Enterprise, and Global Green USA, the latter being a combination advocacy group and green developer.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: katrina, new orleans, green building, leed

Kellie Lunney is a reporter for National Journal in Washington.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 8, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, we know that if government has its way, it sure as hell won't be BROWN OR BLACK building that is the furuter of New Orleans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Na,
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 8, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can't have green buildings for a chocolate city. Green and black is WAY too 70's. Whatever happens in NOLA, it will be outsiders that have to do it, since NOLA seems to have a helpless mentality.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Na, Posted by: voodude
IS THAT WHY IT'S TAKING SO LONG?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 8, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At first no one cared where these people lived. They were shipped all over the country like cattle. Now suddenly it's time to 'go green'. What B.S. Affordable housing IS energy efficient.No pools to heat, no SUV's. The absence of luxuries cuts energy costs. Affordable apartments are not the culprits. And I don't think this is about McMansions. New Orleans has been a shameful reflection on this country. You want green, plant some damn grass. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Green building for the poor in other countries...
Posted by: kuro_neko on Feb 8, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what should be the forefront of the approach in post-Katrina south. Ecological bricks made from recycled trash... This is being used for low-income housing in Argentina and Brazil.

In a project funded in part by Germany's technical cooperation agency, GTZ, CEVE developed a brick made of used food (primarily candy) wrappers and plastic (primarily PET) soda and water bottles. Used beverage containers are provided by the city's selective collection plant, collection points in schools and government agencies, plus rejects from the local bottling plant. The PE film is provided by the Converflex company (Arcor) in Córdoba province, which recycles PVC film but not other plastics.

The plastics are ground up and then mixed with Portland cement and chemical additives to make the bricks and something CEVE calls "brick plates." The CEVE project hires unemployed youth (between 18-24 years old) to make the bricks. The participants can use the bricks to build their own mini-houses.

CEVE says that the resulting bricks are lighter (about 1.1 kg vs. an average 2 kg for a regular brick) and cheaper (by about half) than traditional bricks, but comparable in terms of durability, water and fire resistance, with good heat and sound insulation properties. In outdoor exposure tests undertaken by CEVE over the course of two years, the materials stood up well to both weather and ultraviolet radiation.

[And did I mention that CEVE has developed a roofing material consisting of sheets made from ground-up PET bottles mixed with crushed peanut shells and/or wood shavings?]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's an irony no one dares discuss
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 8, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Building green is admirable. But there's an irony in ignoring indigenous knowledge about re-building NOLA in the same place at all, a knowing floodplain that constantly shifts with the river and coastal habitats. Look, I know it's really nice to camp right by the stream but there's a consequence for doing that. The greenest building in the world is wonderful but utterly stupid when build in the middle of a wash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what are you talking about?
Posted by: kelt65 on Feb 8, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Pre-Katrina New Orleans was already a kind of new urbanist city for the working poor. It had relatively high density, affordable prices, one of the nation's best ratios of income to housing costs, and an above-average rate of homeownership among African Americans, as well as fine parks and a decent system of public transportation -- the key elements of the new-urban formula."

Wow, you've obviously never been nor lived here. The poor in New Orleans live pretty much like the poor in Brazil or Mexico.

I don't know where you pulled that stat about higher rate of home ownership from, because this city is overflowing with Section 8 slumlords. It's the get rich quick scheme of every bourgeois here.

There was no "new urbanism" in New Orleans. The city was destroyed by highways and the same urban planning that makes every US city a hellhole. It's just old and there are a lot of activists involved in preservation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When you're merely asking for it, and when you're begging for it.
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Feb 10, 2007 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you live below sea level, mostly surrounded by water, behind lousy levees, on sinking land, in hurricane alley, with global warming accelerating, you're asking for it.

If you try to rebuild New Orleans, you're begging for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]