Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Corporate Agribusiness Is Behind Our Deadly Food Supply

By Sally Kohn, AlterNet. Posted December 18, 2006.


An E. coli outbreak in China could spell disaster in your own dining room.
Advertisement

First it was spinach. Now it's green onions at the Taco Bell. What's next? The growing anxiety over our nation's food supply is enough to make you chew your nails -- unless of course they're contaminated with E. coli as well. Is nothing safe?

In the United States today, 80 percent of beef is slaughtered by four companies, 75 percent of pre-cut salad mixes are processed by two companies and 30 percent of milk is processed by just one company. Most of our fresh produce comes from the same region of California where the contaminated spinach and now green onions were grown. During off seasons, up to 70 percent of the produce sold in the United States comes from other countries.

Globalization has meant that, with the click of a button, we can connect with people and places halfway across the country or the world. But rather than just exchanging ideas and cultures, we've increasingly come to depend on the rest of the world for our consumption of goods, services, energy -- and food. With the speed of clicking a button, an E. coli outbreak in California or China can threaten our entire food supply and risk a widespread pandemic.

Gone are the days of family farms, which would produce sustainable, healthy food that also fed the local economy. Today, a staggering 330 farmers abandon farming each week. In the 1930s, there were over seven million family farms in our country. Today, roughly two million remain.

In their place, large, corporate-run farms have driven down the price of food, thanks largely to massive subsidies from the federal government but also "economies of scale." Yet cutting costs comes at a price. When you buy an apple at your local farmer's market from a farmer's in your region, there's no packaging involved and the only energy the farmer spent to get you that apple was a few miles worth of gas.

When you buy an apple grown all the way across the country -- or on the other side of the globe -- that apple is wrapped in paper and cardboard and shipped over boats and planes and then trucks to your store, a considerably greater cost to the environment.

The money you spend on the apple, after the grocery store takes its cut, goes into the mega-profits of some distant agribusiness, a considerable cost to your local economy.

But also, aggregating farming means aggregating risk. In the case of the E. coli contaminated spinach outbreak this past September, the spinach was grown at massive, industrial farms in southern California and shipped around the United States.

The E. coli came from an industrial cattle ranch nearby. Tightly packed cows were over fed with unhealthy grain and produced E. coli in their feces. The contaminated feces washed downstream into the water supply, infecting the spinach fields.

There is much talk right now about "energy independence" -- the idea that the United States should rely on sustainable, renewable energy sources rather military conflict and political instability in the pursuit of oil. Food must be no different. Given the recent E. coli scares, we can no longer ignore the warning signs. Long-distance food of corporate agribusiness threatens our environment, our economy and our health. If we're feeling insecure, it's no wonder. We are what we eat.

There's a movement afoot to restore the health and safety of our food supply and support the livelihood and culture of small, family farmers. "The Meatrix", an incredibly clever animated spoof that exposes the dangers of factory farming, was viewed online by over 4.2 million people in the first three months it was released.

And just this past October, hundreds of thousands of people from over 150 continents convened in Turin, Italy, at a gathering for the international Slow Food organization, which calls for food that is good, clean and fair.

On it's website, the organization Local Harvest lists almost 10,000 farmers' markets, cooperative grocery stores, restaurants and more that provide locally-grown, organic produce to consumers. From Pulaski, Tennessee, to Moline, Illinois, there are already opportunities in big cities and small towns across the entire country to buy safe and nutritious food right from our own backyards. As demand for local produce grows, these markets will grow too.

Those of us who can afford to buy local, organic food grown sustainably by family farmers should do so. From jams and breads to apples and nuts, if we lead with our taste buds and our wallets we will over time help bring down the cost of locally grown food by eliminating the unfair competition of subsidized, artificially cheap agribusiness.

We will also solve the food crisis worldwide, where U.S. agribusiness has similarly trampled family farms and local food production from Mexico to India. Our reward will be a better world -- and food on our table that is nutritious, delicious and safe to eat.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: globalization, economy, agribusiness, taco bell, spinach, e coli

Sally Kohn is the director of the Movement Vision Project of the Center for Community Change, which is interviewing hundreds of activists across the country to determine the progressive vision for the future of the United States.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
refreshing
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 18, 2006 2:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How refreshing - a movement for life instead of death. Health is our most important product and the current regime in the US has made things worse instead of better. Back to the local farm and away from the poisons of global farms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad Fact about Collateral Damage
Posted by: djnoll on Dec 18, 2006 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In her article, Ms. Kohn failed to mention that the spinach fields which she indicated were industrially farmed were in fact organically farmed. The contamination did come from nearby industrial meat facilities contaminating the water supply. Until we hold industrial operations accountable for the collateral damage that they cause, even organic operations are at risk of not only producing unhealthy foods, but of loss of income and respect by consumers. Oh, wait, that is what industrial agribusiness wants!?! Duh! It is unfortunate that the farms that were contaminated may not be able to sue for lost income or their rights under the Constitution because they are not as big as the agribusiness operations that caused the damage. As long as we allow these kinds of agribusinesses and their chemical and pharmaceutical partners to dominate our communities and our government, we are all doomed to unsafe, unsecure, poisonous food supplies that are not economically or sustainably sound.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Collateral Damage OF GREED Posted by: Krain61
If you have a yard with decent sunlight...
Posted by: Daniel Shays on Dec 18, 2006 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
than grow at least a little bit of your own produce in season. A four foot row of collards, kale and chard each will keep a small family in healthy greens for months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even if you do not garden, get a subscription to ORGANIC GARDNER
Posted by: mdruss42 on Dec 18, 2006 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAGAZINE, as these folks have been trying to tell us of the dangers for at least 60 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My grandmother was poor, but grew most of her veg/fruit
Posted by: Bobsays on Dec 18, 2006 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She kept a very long and narrow garden. As a child I would help her bring in the onions and berries. It was all great stuff. And she would cook it for the Sunday dinner. Then feminism and mass-mechanised working hit the world. And dinner and fresh food has never been the same.

My gran worked as a cleaner yet she bought and paid for a house. I have prestige jobs, yet I am only just about able to afford a mortgage in my 'world class' city. The third worldification of buying power and the economy has taken living standards down. And time-poor people cut corners and factory farming is happy to help. My cousin is a millionaire who made her money peddling high fat, high sodium ready meals to lazy workers. Welcome to the modern world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Control Over Our Health Always Takes Its Toll
Posted by: michaeltwatson on Dec 18, 2006 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your story takes note of the degradation of our health by virtue of the corporate control over the decisions, policies and practices. You have pointed out the effect on our foods. In addition, corporate control over other health matters is just as rampant. When was the last time that your doctor's office asked you about your health before they asked you about your insurance? The reason is that your insurance company, by virtue of a decision by a bureaucrat in some distant state, has already decided what tests you can have, what prescription you can get, or what treatment you deserve, based upon statistics or facts over which you and your doctor have no control. That is why our healthcare is more expensive than that of any other industrialized nation, and why we have over 190,000 people killed each year by hospital error, and 90,000 people killed each year by hospital infections. It is because the insurance companies control costs, not quality. Then when someone is hurt or killed by medical error, they say that injured patients should have their rights limited in order to keep everyone else's costs down. We need to get back some quality in the process of healthcare delivery, rather than allowing the insurance companies to control all of the decisions. Michael Townes Watson, author of America's Tunnel Vision--How Insurance Companies' Propaganda Is Corrupting Medicine and Law. . www.StopMedicalError.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eat locally, grow locally
Posted by: Sunfell on Dec 18, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is an increasing movement towards being a 'locavore'- local eating, and eating foods grown in safer environments. I think that this might be the way to break the stranglehold of the corporate farms and food processors over our food, and regain the trust in food safety.

I have friends who have 'shares' in cattle that are naturally grown and fed, and we have a community farm association where people can subscribe to get baskets of fresh grown local produce every week or so.

And there is nothing wrong with growing your own veggies- even in containers. Just make sure to get good compost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ag-Business Killing America
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 18, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there has always been food poisoning. This is nothing new. The problem is that the distribution channels are so long and the monoply is so complete that it can effect more people at one time. Also the problem is people have weak immune systems from living/working in such sanitised environments. Ag-business is also killing off small town America and farm life. The gov't is complicite in this practice with their crop price manipulation, support of private monopolies, substities for growing certain crops and using chemicals, and cheap loans. This must stop. Grow/kill your own food whereever possible (although gov't tries to restrict this with crazy zoning rules, environmental regulations, permitting, and animal RFID Act.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

3 obvious reasons...
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Dec 18, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can think of 3 reasons why more people are getting sick from big agri.

1. Oil prices are leading to cuts in pesticide use, which in turn allows insects to spread more germs. Also, R&D in pesticides has decreased because the costs are becoming so prohibitive. More and more insects are becoming immune to existing pesticides every year.

2. Global warming has led to more resilient insect populations. Especially, but not limited to, seasonal insect populations.

3. General competition leads to cost cutting. Sanitation must have been on the chopping block.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My Obvious Posted by: Krain61
» RE: My Obvious Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: 3 obvious reasons... Posted by: djnoll
» RE: 3 obvious reasons... Posted by: Krain61
» RE: 3 obvious reasons... Posted by: crusty
» RE: 3 obvious reasons... Posted by: Krain61
» RE: 3 obvious reasons... Posted by: shoosta
Where's Homeland Security and the Drug Enforcement Agency when you need 'em?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 18, 2006 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, I forgot, they don't do food.

P.S.: A former DEA member revealed to me the DEA's plans to give Big Agri/Phrma MORE EXEMPTIONS to allow the free-flow of MORE FOOD/DRUG POISONING and yes, she resigned in protest. At this rate, I'd prefer to join civil libertarians in calling for abolishing the DEA and/or HS or at leasting pushing for a MAJOR REFORM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try this math
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Dec 18, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the early 70s there were about 50,000 food processing facilities in this country and the USDA managed about 35,000 on-site inspections each year. About a seventy percent chance to get inspected in any given year.

Now there are just over 100,000 processing facilities and we manage 5,000 inspections. Good odds that a company can run a facility for close to 20 years and never get inspected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Try this math Posted by: yellow
» NO YOU Try this math Posted by: Krain61
» That was incredible! Posted by: ABetterFuture
Not all bullsh*t comes from the back end of bovines.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 18, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The contaminated feces washed downstream into the water supply, infecting the spinach fields.

Contaminated feces? As opposed to Gaia's own rosey-smelling poo-petals?

The author should have stuck with making the case for buying from local farms based on personal preference, a distaste for over-involvement of government in commerce, and the questionable soundness of predicating our food supply on dirt cheap energy in perpetuity. Those are very strong points, and they can made in a quite compelling manner.

Attempting to attribute the recent infections by entero-pathogenic strains of E. coli to farming tactics employed to cheaply feed 300M Americans lends the author's argument less credibility, not more. Make the case for local farms based on their own merits, not by throwing...well, "contaminated feces" at large scale commerce, hoping something will stick. This E. coli "the-sky-is-falling" fluff piece was chock full of the same stuff it attempts to lament.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Note to Author
Posted by: cstriker on Dec 18, 2006 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You should probably verify your facts a little more thoroughly before you scare people any more than they already are. I'm not writting generally about your article. It is a good article and brings up some very good points. However, the part about the green onions with E-coli is still under debate. Taco Bell had some analysis done on them and their results came back with a questionable positive. Then the FDA conducted more tests on the onions and it turns out they were negative for E-coli.

Good luck with your article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Note to Author Posted by: Krain61
Pay for health instead of paying to be unhealthy
Posted by: Krain61 on Dec 18, 2006 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We had the same thing before with the strawberries and different times with beef..And they will never stop it from happening.As long as big companies are involved you and me will pay the price..These companies take human waste and put on these fields before it has been decomposed to a safe level.And then you have the CHEMICAL COMPANIES also involved selling herbicides,Fungicides and Pesticides which takes it's toll on the people who eat that Garbage.It's all in the name of Greed and Profits..And then when they package the food there is 15,000 chemicals they can add with out putting it on the label..And we wondering why so many people get cancer and other illnesses..But then the DRUG COMPANIES and your DOCTORS will percribe and sell you something to cover that up..These Chemicals in our food make us fat and they are like a drug which make's you want to eat or crave them but then there is someone else out there selling you something to help you loose weight..Aint they smart and aint you dum for following what your doctor or that clever add in your paper or on the TV or on the internet..And then they made the law where you can only buy pasturized milk which means they rob your body of enzimes that help your body fight the things that attack your body..There so smart and they have all these lobbiests that pay the freaking people that are voted in by us..Like Floridation{It's a waste Product} No value what so ever and harms you.But they have people convinced of all the lies that help the rich get richer and we are getting sicker all the time..They put Chorine in your water and when you take a hot shower it turns to gas and you breat it in..You just don't know it's there..
People who have springs and do not put chorine in there water and eat the stuff they raise they rarely get sick..I know I'm one of them.If you eat organic meat for one whole month and then eat a micky d's burger you would get sick to your stomach.So if you have kids and don't take them out to eat that crap they won't get sick as often.If your lucky to have your own milk cow you would help them and yourself even more.. If you bought natural and then was able to avoid doctors then one would off set the other..I havn't been to a doctor in almost 20 years except to have surgery on my knee and shoulder but nothing else..So it's your choice.I deliver Hazmat loads and have delivered stuff to the places that make the food you eat..The one load had 5 placards on it and one of them was poison{skull and cross bones} Cambells soup was the place.
Mmm Mmm Good! We as Americans are afraid to say and do the right thing..They say by having mega farms will reduce the price you pay..Why do local Dairy Farmers still get almost the same price that got almost 25 or 30 years ago but were paying how freakin much for milk and dairy poducts.Sounds like a deal? Not!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We will be screwed
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Dec 18, 2006 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the food safety and the worthless FDA issues become worse, we are in the process of losing our ability to grow our own personal foods. Remember a few years ago when they were trying to make gardeners purchase a pemit to grow a garden? Well seed companies are hybridizeing seeds and patenting them making it impossible to save seed as hybrids do not reproduce the same variety from saved seed.These seed companies and the Govt. want to have total control of the food supply! And raiseing meat too is also undergoing similar attemts, to push out the small scale farmer. Money greed and dominance. To hell with the common man!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We will be screwed Posted by: sasquuatch55
Food Security, The Bush Family/Neocons and Their 'New World Order'
Posted by: bob t on Dec 18, 2006 2:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subtitle:
Food Security+Agribusiness+NAFTA Superhighway+ Republican Party=Terrorism+WWIII=Bush Family/Neocons= 'A NEW World Order'.

Thats certainly not my choice, is it yours? I doubt it, just ask yourself if that scenario doesn't sound and fell quite ominous to you and your family. Read On...

I would never buy food or anything else from Pulaski, Tenn becuse it would be contaminated, not by e.coli, but by Tennessee racism and republican racism.

But beyond that, the solution is very simple and that is our gov't, but not now, but maybe someday when it is once again our gov't must stop all subsidies to agribusiness. I want my farm subsidy tax dollars to go only to small and medium family farms, nothing else. That won't be supported by agribusiness or their corrupt republican friends who care nothing about America or our security but only their own wealth. Family farms totally contribute to our american independance and by the same token to our countries security.
Other examples of corporate greed that lessens our countries security are the oil companies, the BIG BUSINESSES that suck up all the funds of the Small Business Administration (SBA) and Micro$oft is number one on that list and the Nafta Superhighway which will be huge in destroying our security while stealing jobs from america's truckdrivers(giving them to mexican truck drivers and who do you trust more american or mexican truck drivers; and stealing jobs from american stevedores who work on our docks, once again who do you trust more to protect our ports and their security). And yet just look at what the Bushies and their Republican corportocracy are doing as they work toward the NAFTA Superhighway goal. This will draw down our countries security to zero and is very highly likely to cause terrorists(just exactly who are the terrorists now) to achieve their goals, once more throwing our country into death and chaos. And so I am led to ask why would they do this? To me the answer is very obvious, it will lead to Repub desire for 'A NEW World Order' by causing the Republicans to take control of America and then to start another world war. And remember our congress knew nothing about all of this until approx 2-3months ago. So how is that for whats left of our democracy. OK, our Republic, but you all know what I mean.

Fight for democracy
PRAY FOR PEACE

Bob DAmico
Cleve, Oh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Attack of the Killer Tomato
Posted by: lrrysgl on Dec 18, 2006 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Attack of the Killer Tomato
by Peter Bahouth

Last January, while sitting in a restaurant in Toronto, I ordered a salad. The salad came with a tomato on it. I found myself wondering, "Where did this tomato come from?" So I tracked it.

This tomato's story begins on land acquired by the US-based Jolly Green Giant Company in partnership with the Mexican Development Corporation. The land was previously an ejido - land used by farmers for publicly owned cooperative farms.

The tomato seed, a hybrid developed from an original Mexican strain, is now patented and owned by Calgene, Inc., which purchased the research from the University of California at Davis. The University developed the hybrid with a research grant paid for by U.S. tax dollars.

The land was fumigated with methyl bromide, an ozone-depleter 120 times more potent than Chloroflourocarbon-111 (CFC-111). It was also treated with pesticides developed, manufactured and distributed by the Monsanto corporation, one of the US' largest polluters. Production waste was shipped to the world's largest hazardous waste landfill in Emelle, Alabama - a predominantly poor African-American community.

The Mexican farm workers were given no protection from the pesticides: no gloves, masks or safety instructions. They make approximately $2.50 a day and have no access to health care.

Once harvested, the tomato was placed was placed with others on a plastic tray covered in plastic wrap, then placed in a cardboard box. The plastic is manufactured with chlorine produced by the Formosa company of Point Comfort, Texas. Workers and citizens of Point Comfort face a potentially significant risk of cancer and immune-suppression disease due to exposure to dioxin, a byproduct of chlorine production.

The cardboard comes from British Columbia's 300-year-old trees, which are processed in Great Lake-region pulp mills, where residents are warned against eating dioxin-contaminated fish. The cardboard is then shipped by the United Trucking Company to Latin American farms.

The boxed tomatoes, reddened by ether (a tasteless gas with no nutritional value), are sent via refrigerated trucks throughout North America. Both trucks and distribution centers are equipped with CFC cooling equipment made by DuPont of Wilmington, Deleware. Once the tomato arrived at its destination in Toronto, the plastic packaging was thrown away, picked up, shipped back into the U.S. and burned in incinerators in Detroit Michigan.

Throughout the process, fossil fuels drive the tomato's trip. The oil that fuels the trucks (and warms the climate) is drilled from the Gulf of Comache, Mexico, extracted by Chevron and processed by Pemex, the Mexican national oil company. The fuel that makes the tomato's trip possible is then shipped via tanker (dodging 3800 existing oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico to refineries in the U.S. Gulf coast that are uniquely responsible for the death of the region's environment and economy. the fuel is then distributed to the plastic makers, pesticide pushers, packaging barons and motor-vehicle owners that make this killer tomato's 3,000-mile attack possible.

If we look at the true economics of an everyday item like a 50-cent tomato - including the social costs of this type of production - you can see what is really driving this type of economic system. You realize that having your own garden and growing your own tomatoes can be a very subversive and radical act.

And it makes the fruit taste that much sweeter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GIANT AGRIBUNINESS AND THE FAMILY FARMER
Posted by: lrrysgl on Dec 18, 2006 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few years ago, family farm activist Merle Hansen wrote the following in an article entitled “Farm Crisis and the Progressive Community”:

“The chronic crisis of low farm prices and high production costs during the 1980’s forced off the land 24% of the rural population in the USA. Nebraska lost one third of its rural population. Since 1945 the United States has eliminated 4 million farmers. Land loss among blacks in the South continues at a rate of two and one half times greater than the national average. At one time there were 926,000 African American farmers. All of our black farmers may be gone by the year 2000…

…If we continue to allow this elite group of economic giants to dominate the farm and food sector, we are poised to dump two billion of the 3.1 billion people who still live in the rural areas of the world into the cities. There unemployment and other social, political and environmental problems await them. The forces rapidly pushing the world towards industrialization of agriculture are the same forces dominating U.S. farm and food production.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SUPPORT COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE (CSA)
Posted by: lrrysgl on Dec 18, 2006 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Community Supported Agriculture consists of a community of individuals who pledge support to a farm operation so that the farmland becomes, either legally or spiritually, the community's farm, with the growers and consumers providing mutual support and sharing the risks and benefits of food production. Typically, members or "share-holders" of the farm or garden pledge in advance to cover the anticipated costs of the farm operation and farmer's salary. In return, they receive shares in the farm's bounty throughout the growing season, as well as satisfaction gained from reconnecting to the land and participating directly in food production. Members also share in the risks of farming, including poor harvests due to unfavorable weather or pests. By direct sales to community members, who have provided the farmer with working capital in advance, growers receive better prices for their crops, gain some financial security, and are relieved of much of the burden of marketing.

Find out more at this URL: http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/csa/csa.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bottom line
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Dec 18, 2006 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bottom line is going to be that the source of the E coli outbreak will be imported produce from Mexico OR that the contamination was begun on American farms using Mexican labor that do not use the local facilites when they have a need...... Just like in their own country where it is common to use human waste to fertilize the crops. I bet this is already known by the "experts" who refuse to publicly tell the truth about the contamination because of political correctness and their wish to not offend "turd worlders".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» fuck you, dikheadaiosyne Posted by: AdamG
» RE: bottom line thats moronic Posted by: sasquuatch55
Hogs and Spinach
Posted by: Jarmadi on Dec 20, 2006 3:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Early on, in this e-coli thing, there was an argument that feral hogs might be the culprit in the contamination of the California spinach fields. If this was not true in this instance, I would guess that it will be a significant problem in the future. America's feral hog population continues to grow, and if they roam in the area of your farm, they will be invading your acres, and regardless of the crops that you have, if they can mess anything up, they will. Feral hogs are neither cute, nor clean, and their reputation for intelligence is, in my opinion, unwarranted. They will wallow in sewage lagoons, and then go rinse off in irrigation canals, of course after rooting their way through your spinach fields.

Feral hogs can plague large corporate farms, and also the smallest of family farm operations. Trapping seems to be the best way to limit populations of these hogs. Last fall we set one hog trap of about 8 ft diameter on the edge of one wheat field, and in one month caught 30 hogs that averaged about 110 lb each, but doubtless did not even dent the local population.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Netanya
Posted by: Netanya3 on Dec 21, 2006 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Intensive Factory Farming Enterprises, which dominate the "animals for food" industry and have pushed family farms into bankrupt status not only exploit and horribly abuse animals by inhumane methods of production, but also commit the crime of exploiting workers, who are predominately illegal immigrants who have no choice of jobs, require no benefits and are afraid to complain. These giant corporations imprison billions of animals from birth til brutal death in confinements of steel and concrete, alienated from all nature and compassion. When America wakes up to the health issues caused from consumption of meat/poultry/eggs/dairy from animals grown/produced by the widespread use of antibiotics, steroid growth hormones and the cruel hand of corporate executives, perhaps they will lend an ear to the voices for the animals in the animal movement, whom the masses like to deem as "animal nuts". Maybe we "nuts" aren't as nutty as you would like to think regarding the health consequences of the inhumane torture and abuse of animals, the environmental hazards of waste water, etc. that goes in the miles and miles of factory farming facilities when it affects your own health and life span.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Netanya
Posted by: Netanya3 on Dec 21, 2006 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Intensive Factory Farming Enterprises, which dominate the "animals for food" industry and have pushed family farms into bankrupt status not only exploit and horribly abuse animals by inhumane methods of production, but also commit the crime of exploiting workers, who are predominately illegal immigrants who have no choice of jobs, require no benefits and are afraid to complain. These giant corporations imprison billions of animals from birth til brutal death in confinements of steel and concrete, alienated from all nature and compassion. When America wakes up to the health issues caused from consumption of meat/poultry/eggs/dairy from animals grown/produced by the widespread use of antibiotics, steroid growth hormones and the cruel hand of corporate executives, perhaps they will lend an ear to the voices for the animals in the animal movement, whom the masses like to deem as "animal nuts". Maybe we "nuts" aren't as nutty as you would like to think regarding the health consequences of the inhumane torture and abuse of animals, the environmental hazards of waste water, etc. that goes in the miles and miles of factory farming facilities when it affects your own health and life span.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]