Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Is Organic Fast Food a Total Whopper?

By Kate Galbraith, Grist.org. Posted October 28, 2006.


As the $14 billion organic food industry gathers steam, the concept of healthy fast food is spreading.
Advertisement

The succulent wares of Whole Foods' enormous flagship store in Austin are always tempting, but especially so during a harried lunch hour. Everything in the vast prepared-food section looks irresistible. The salad bar features a mountain of fresh, organic toppings. Pricing is mostly by weight, so one can escape with a cup of splendid, coconutty split-pea soup and a small salad for less than $6. For those who have the time, dozens of tables are available for sit-down dining.

As the $14 billion organic food industry gathers steam, the concept of healthy fast food is spreading. While Whole Foods is in the vanguard, others are catching up. More and more restaurants are tapping into Americans' desire to eat quickly, and realizing that fast food can involve much healthier stuff than a Whopper and fries.

Austin, never shy about its green tendencies, is also home to drive-through salad bars and a pair of tasty restaurants called Mr. Natural, which offer wholesome Mexican food and baked goods. In other cities, organic pizza and burgers -- which are relatively easy to make -- are becoming a staple.

Some big chains are scrambling to get a share of this niche. Chipotle, a fast-expanding burrito company that went public earlier this year, boasts that about 20 percent of its beans are organic -- and "next year I imagine that percentage will be higher," says Steve Ells, the chief executive. The pork, too, is sustainably raised and hormone-free. Best of all, customers can watch their food being prepared -- the onions and peppers being chopped up, and the chicken readied on an open grill. In fact, Ells bristles at being lumped in with other, more traditional fast food -- despite the fact that much of his chain's success is due to support from McDonald's. "Just because it's fast doesn't mean it has to be a typical fast-food experience," he argues.

That philosophy is shared by plenty of start-ups. O'Naturals, a New England chain that currently has two restaurants each in Maine and Massachusetts, notes that one-third of its food is organic. There are organic roast-beef sandwiches, organic hummus, and organic greens for salads, not to mention bottled smoothies to wash everything down. Gary Hirshberg, who cofounded Stonyfield Yogurt and dreamed up O'Naturals while shuttling his children between soccer games, is now busy extending the franchise. On the West Coast, the Organic To Go chain touts everything from ham and cheese to veggie salads, with 70 percent of its ingredients typically being organic.

Several of Organic To Go's dining spots are on college campuses, many of which are offering more local and healthy fare in response to student demand. At the University of Colorado at Boulder, the recently opened Piazanos "grab n' go" café peddles natural and organic food. Vanderbilt University just opened a 900-square-foot convenience store called Nectar that does organic. The Otter Bay Café at California State University at Monterey Bay offers organic salads and fruits.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: environment, fast food

Kate Galbraith is an Austin-based journalist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
we won
Posted by: questionthemark1 on Oct 28, 2006 1:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ann Coulter calls herself a culture warrior, and in a sense she's right. Her type has lost that war.

We've won. Organic food on the rise, the internet as the only true democracy, decreased cost of self publishing books, and decreased cost of creating art. This is a communication revolution and it spurs the rest of it, one such thing being the growth of organic foods.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who's We? Posted by: edith
beginning
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 28, 2006 3:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully this is the beginning of the end of America's epidemic of obesity and lives cut short by poor diet and poor health care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: beginning Posted by: swells
» baloney Posted by: AdamG
» RE: beginning Posted by: edith
Aaaah, new legislation allows for organic to be controlled now by the FDA...
Posted by: Prophit on Oct 28, 2006 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... instead of the Organic association and that has caused problems. Example: Horizon dairy products calls itself organic, however, they feed lot their cows which used to be against the regulations. Its only one example. When codex passed attached to CAFTA, the company NOW changed their Aminos by eliminating the amino acid L-Carnitin and reintroduced the Amino acid complex as Amino General instead of Amino 1000. Then when I followed up with that to see why, I discovered L-Carnitin was then sold separately with a trademark and why??? Because they are fronting for a drug company.

The drug company messed with that ingredient which is a critical natural ingredient to Aminos and was able to trademark it now that it is no longer a "natural" ingredient. Its getting hard out there. I have no idea who now owns these companies who used to provide these products and food. So be very vigilant as we are vulnerable to the lies and allowable mislabeling that was passed by congress. Another reason to VOTE OUT ALL INCUMBANTS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Total agreement Posted by: tlCampbell
» get to know some organic farmers Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Fast Food, Whether Organic Or Not, Poses A Threat To The Environment
Posted by: Douglas on Oct 28, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fast food is a product of the oil-based automobile culture of the 20th century and it needs to go the way of oil lamps and the horse and buggy. Fast food, as Eric Schlosser pointed out in his 2001 bestselling book Fast Food Nation, has hastened the malling of the landscape, widened the chasm between the rich and the poor, caused the increasing destruction of both our farmlands and our forests, contributed to our continual wasteful guzzling of oil, fueled an epidemic of obesity, and propelled American cultural imperialism abroad. Organic fast food, if that is not an oxymoron (I think that it is), continues to pose the same major threat to the environment. Junk food, whether organic or not, must go!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, then don't buy it! Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Rethinking short term thinking. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Sigh. The feeling is quite mutual. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» And these were some of MY inputs... Posted by: ABetterFuture
Meet the new boss...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Oct 28, 2006 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a kid, my mother would sometimes buy our family cookies from the "natural food" co-op. Instead of processed sugar, they were sweetened with fruit juice. Instead of the types of fats usually found in "traditional" junk food, slightly healthier types were substituted. The result was a far cry from what my friends thought of as an Oreo, but proved to be (like other health-food staples such as tofu & carob) at least an edible & slightly less harmful "alternative".

Years later, I happen to work at a co-op. The "healthy" cookie of my youth no longer exists. My store sells several brands of all-natural/organic cookies that exactly replicate the taste of the classic Oreo (& every other conceivable form of cookie, potato chip, soft drink, etc.). How do they accomplish this feat? Instead of using "traditional" processed sugars, they substitute "organic" processed sugars. Instead of other "traditional" additives & flavorings, they substitute "organic" additives & flavorings. In some cases, salt content is actually higher than even the outrageous levels in normal packaged foods.

...Getting the picture?

Every day, morbidly obese shoppers trundle down the aisles, loading up on junk food they believe to be somehow less junk-y due to it's magical "organic" aura. Similarly, whippet-thin yoga-grandma's unthinkingly reach for the bagged "organic" salad mix, safe in the knowledge that they are "making a difference". Many customers have been known to return products with the complaint that they didn't "taste" organic!

The only real health benifit to eating organic food (as we have come to know it) is the absence of pesticide residue (& in the case of meat, hormones & antibiotics). People don't seem to realize that in order for these companies to make enough product to meet consumer demand, all other sustainability & health advantages are being, or have been, scrapped. Mass-organic farming & production, coupled with industry & governmental collusion has made the "organic" label practically meaningless at best, & positively misleading at worst.

Anyone with an interest in the ramifications of what we call "organic" food should read Michael Pollan's excellent "The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals". It's an "easily digestable" primer on the current state of the "natural food" industry, as well as offering some possible solutions.

*It should be noted that the store I work at, like any good "natural grocer", it highly transparent in it's practices. All staff are encouraged to be knowledgeable and honest about the origins & policies of various producers.*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

organic twinkies-coming to a natural food store near you...
Posted by: AdamG on Oct 28, 2006 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
before too long, you can bet on it.

Everyone should read Michael Pollan's book, "The Omnivore's Dilemma". The author documents 4 meals, 2 of which are "organic". One of the "organic" meals is a meal bought at Whole Foods. It shows that the "organic industry" is just that, an industry. It is only organic by substitution and dilution.

While it's good that there is less pesticides and synthetics used in large scale organic agriculture, it still uses lots of energy. Also, as the demand for organic continues to outpace US supplies, companies are increasingly importing organic raw materials from, you guessed it, China. From what I've read about the standards and enforcement in China, anything labeled organic is dubious.

While not ready to concede that the "war" for healthier food and living choices is over, I believe the battlefield has changed. I think local, seasonal choices is where things are shifting to. Also, I think new types of assosiative economic arrangements such as CSA's and other direct farmer-consumer financing/marketing opportunities, community gardens, farmer marketing cooperatives, and even just personal home gardens instead of lawns and landscaping are where the new fights are being held.

Overall, the solution isn't in just substitution of more benign substances to prop up our consumptive lifestyle. Unti we shift our perception, and renew our culture, will be in the same situation. Until we work with the living process in a way where our basic needs are met and we observe, acknowledge, and reciprocate the sacrifice that is made to meet those needs will humanity continue to suffer. Our goal should be to intentionally cocreate communities based on communication, consideration, and compassion. We should not settle on just being anonymous customers. As long as we do, we will continued to be sold to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

biochemurgic
Posted by: biochemurgic on Oct 28, 2006 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I agree with Douglas that "Fast food is a product of the oil-based automobile culture" and that it must "go the way of oil lamps and the horse and buggy," the current reality is that lots of folks have the fast-food habit and saddle their kids with the same habit. So, as an entry-point for more responsible habits, I applaud the folks who are trying to mimic the fast-food experience with some better choices.

But what is "better"? I hope the pioneers in this arena don't fall into the trap of thinking---or implying---that just because something is organic, it is automatically more healthful and socially beneficial than the mainstream alternative. In other words, I hope the fast food purveyors don't end up being like Whole Foods Markets, where a lot of the organic foods were grown far, far away and where the aisles are filled with such absurdities as organic prepared dinners made with white flour or white rice. Sorry foks, refined grains are junk food whether or not they are organic!

I would also like to see the alternative fast food outlets try, as much as possible, to source their foods from local and regional farmers and to promote the benefits of that choice. There is a small pizza chain in my neck of the woods that does exactly that, and I applaud the owner's careful consideration of the social and ecological ramifications of his purchasing decisions. Nevertheless, he is selling a lot of cheese-laden pizzas on white-flour crusts, so we get back to the issue of how closely alternative fast food should mimic its execrable mainstream models.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It all comes down to two things, Posted by: no one special
Whole foods isn't all that bad especially when you can get bran-free hemp and flax foods.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 28, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully Walmart, Target, and others will follow suit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

about organic fast food
Posted by: Domingo Nieves on Oct 28, 2006 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that organic fast food is an oxymorom. "Organic food" is raised in a manner that respects/aligns with natural cycles. To consume organic food while continuing to practice our American cultural values related to efficiency, competition and productivity is to miss the point. It's like building missles for peace or mouthing Christian platitudes about love and brotherhood at church on Sunday while doing everything you can during the work week to destroy the competition. Organic food is a product of particular values, and has nothing whatsoever to do with appreciating those values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Local foods and products just as (or nearly as) important as organic
Posted by: thelostsailor on Oct 28, 2006 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's promising that the fast food industry may be beginning to incorporate some REAL food, but you never mentioned once the inherent fallacy of fast food 'chains'. They ship their 'food' products thousands of miles and if that's not enough, they ship them with you at the end, while your car spews more energy in the drive-thru lane waiting.
Locally produced products thrown into the mix of new startup 'real food' fast food would be another great big step....
DO YOU WHERE THOSE CIRCUS ANIMALS IN YOUR BIG MAC WERE RAISED???!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Local is MORE important than organic
Posted by: mama_jess on Oct 29, 2006 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These days, many small farmers can't afford to get certified, or feed their animals organically. Many of them still grow their food in an organic manner, but without the valuable "brand" of organic to help them sell their wares. That's why I'd rather buy local anytime. When you buy locally, you can easily find out how that carrot was grown. Just ask the farmer. Plus, while perhaps some petroleum products were used in producing it, you know that far less petroleum was burning bringing it to your door. And the more we support our local farmers, the better able will they be to make more sustainable choices, having the financial support to do so. The label "organic" means less and less since the gov't took over the certification process. The only way to know how "organic" something is is to see it in the ground yourself.

Plus, when I buy local foods, I feel tapped into the seasons, and into a history of eating in the place that I live. I love this time of year, when apples and squash and venison come into their full flavor. I appreciate a tomato more for it's short season (and detest the flavorless, grainy ones that hit the supermarkets from california in the winter).

I just opened a Teahouse and restaurant in my town, and we're serving local cheese, meat, veggies, bread, Root Beer, water, and anything else we can get our hands on. It's not fast food, it's slow food. Eating too fast will make you sick to your stomach, and leaves you no time to think about what or why you eat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, but...
Posted by: pcushniesr on Oct 29, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... old farts like me need all the preservatives we can get.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah, but... Posted by: Shehova
Packaged, processed food generally has nasty additives in it.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 29, 2006 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In typical packaged product, whether organic or not, you find a variety of stabilizing additives - sugar, citric acid - and in your typical item you aslo find salt, antibacterial/antifungal compounds, dye compounds, and so on. Shelf life, pleasant aroma, pleasing to the eye - that's the purpose of all of those additives.

If you could some how return your average packaged product to its orginal parts, you'd have little piles of salt and sugar and various chemicals that'd you'd never eat on their own. Why is it that most people would never consider sitting down and having 57 grams (two ounces) of sugar, but a few cold sodas, each with 66 grams of sugar, blended in with flavoring and phosporic or citric acid is nothing unusual? Coca and Pepsi 'concentrate' has to be shipped with corrosize hazmat tags. It's also useful for removing rust and other residues from any metal item.

The closer you get to your food supply, the better. Ideally you know where your food grows - plants in the soil, animals eat the plants, people eat plants, people use plant products, people cultivate and fertilie the soil, people eat animals, use animal products like milk and wool - some people don't like this, but livestock also fertilize fields; you can have dairy cows and not do the "Chicken Run" version. Personally, given the choice of a)milking a cow for food by hand, and b) shooting a cow, hacking it up into bits, and then eating it - I'll take a).

If food is going to be processed it's also good to know the process. Take foods like bread, cheese & beer. (Think of old-style beer as a kind of barley oatmeal with about 5-10% ethanol by volume). It's good to know your baker, your brewer, your local cheese factory and local dairy farm. If the farmer is injecting cow growth hormone into the cow's udders so they swell up and produce more milk, and he's also pumping her full of antibiotics to keep them from getting infected (a side effect of rBST), then you probably don't want to drink that stuff.

Here's the detailed story behind the rBST issue:
"These hypotheses can neither be proven nor disproven, because of the amount of evidence currently available.(1997)". Scientific studies that don't help boost corporate pharmaceutical market share are unpopular with university research administrators who enjoy receiving funding from the industry.

Now the dairy industry and Monsanto are using "lack of rBST" as a marketing tool. I didn't poison your food - so you have to pay more for it! See this article -

From the NYT, Oct 6, 2006:
"By labeling milk free of the artificial hormone, the dairy industry can ride the popularity of natural foods, without the greater expense and special feeds required to produce milk that can be fully certified as “organic.”"

On a more positive note,
"Mexico Shuts the Door on GM Maize
Diego Cevallos*

MEXICO CITY, Oct 28 (Tierramérica) - Ending the reason for protests by environmental activists, and much to the frustration of some scientists and multinational corporations, Mexico has moved to ban experimental fields of genetically modified (GM) maize. But the gateway into Mexico of transgenic maize, in the form of unlabeled grain imports, remains ajar. "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eating fast, is not eating!
Posted by: Cathyc on Oct 29, 2006 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its simply stuffing yourself!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sighhh...
Posted by: fungus on Oct 29, 2006 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, something has to be done to improve the way Americans eat, and to promote organic diets. Is the sale of organic food
by corporate fast-food enterprises the answer? There are many reasons to question this. One objection is that the transport of organic produce long distances takes huge amounts of fossil fuels. Granted there may be relatively few
producers of organic produce... but one of the fundamentals
of ecological thought is that we can't solve one environmental problem by looking to a solution that increases other problems (burning of fossil fuels for transit, for example.)

Environmental thinking was once visionary. Granted, there was a certain naivete in some of the more grandiose
ideas. Still, I'll ask how much of our souls we are willing to
give up to achieve the "possible". McDOnalds, for example, is still McDonalds even if they sell some more healthy meals.
Same with Walmart - but that discussion is for another day.
Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paul Pelican
Posted by: fungus on Oct 29, 2006 4:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Walmart, etc. will continue to cater to people who drive long (or short) distances to shop, burning fossil fuels in the process. They will continue to sell huge numbers of commodities that people could live happily and healthily without, and that will wind up in landfills. Walmart especially will continue to pay low wages, both in the U.S. and on a world scale - and let's face it, poverty and environmental issues are closely related. Corporate environmentalism might sound realistic, but can we look a little more deeply at what it is saying?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalism will never give us wholesome choices
Posted by: logansafi on Oct 29, 2006 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, let's face it, capitalism will never give us wholesome choices. Wholesome fast food will never be offered by the likes of a McDonalds, or any of their competitors. Car culture or not, it could easily be done to offer diners vegetables, organic or not. And fruits. That's what used to be served in cafeterias. But it is not the most profitable way to operate, so the big operators don't choose to give us those choices at reasonable prices. We will never get this choice again on a large scale basis under capitalism.

The capitalist must control every aspect of food prep in every one of his branched out fast food places to max his profits out. Fast food is the result of time engineers studying how to regiment every aspect of food serving by the worker to the sec. Real cooking, like real production of real food, is not like that at all. So factory food has to substitute along with factory 'service'. It is in the nature of the capitalist concentration of production that we have arrived to eating this routinized slop, instead of real food with all of its so many variables.

Choice was eliminated by monopoly capitalism, and it's not about to bring that choice back. Capitalism has largely driven out the family farm, the family market, and the family restaurant. Just to try to vend food from the street is considered a crime most places in the US. It is considered unhealthy! Health is 'packaged' these days, so street vending is the antithesis to what is allowed. Listen to Roanld the Clown instead says the Health Department. No, don't expect to see McDonalds serving greens or fresh fruit with its Happy Meals in the days ahead. It would not be a 'value meal' for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another 'grassroots' alternative
Posted by: elderwoman.org on Oct 30, 2006 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, a lot of the food that carries the USDA Organic label is produced on huge factory farms owned by corporations that are more interested in earning profits than producing safe, sustainably grown food. The biggest organic food companies are now owned by Dole, Kraft, General Mills, Unilever and even Coca Cola. Depressing, isn't it?
So yes, I totally agree with 'mama_jess' and others that it makes much more sense to buy locally, subscribe to CSAs etc. And if you possibly can, grow something yourself, too, even if only in planters and pots.
There is also another option that nobody has yet mentioned. If you check out http://www.naturallygrown.org/ you'll see that there are almost 500 small producers in 47 States who are growing food organically - and in the true spirit of organic - without the USDA label. Their hearts are in the right place and they deserve as much support as we can give them. (Full disclosure: I helped to found a sister organization in the UK called the Wholesome Food Association - you'll see a link to our website on theirs. We are a non-profit organization whose sole aim is to get people back to eating truly organic, local, seasonal, delicious, nutritious, 'slow' food.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

solution to fast-food is beyond "organic" and "food"
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 12, 2006 9:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only reason for fast-food's existence is the U.S. capitalist system that demands unconditional obedience to the 60-100 hour work-week. This work-a-holism leads to scheduling nightmares, commuting, and other ecologically unsustainable stupidity. I lived in southern France for a year and my highly ambitious job called for a daily two hour midday break. I went home and ate from the super's garden. I went back to the office, worked then telecommuted off and on beyond the six hour work day. Funny thing was, I worked harder and felt more rested in that year than I have in my 25 years of 80+ hour work weeks in the US. I also was leaner, more fit, and ate better over there than I do here.

The solution is for the whole notion of "work" to change in the U.S. I know the instant answer, "it cannot be done" here. Because Amerikuh is addicted to greed, money, and obedience to the Master. So, you have fast food, obeisity and all manner of distractions like "organic" standards set by Archer Daniels Midland.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

all things equal...
Posted by: CyberBrook on Nov 17, 2006 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All things equal, in my opinion, organic is better, fair trade is better, local is better, seasonal is better, vegetarian is better, small is better, non-profit is better, worker-owned is better, though some of these might not always be the case. I think that whenever we can, we should strive toward all of these things.

Please visit Eco-Eating at www.brook.com/veg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

70% of US Food is GM
Posted by: cpesprit on Nov 24, 2006 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Due to unfortunate Lack of call for accurate Labeling of our foods eaten in the US, we may be unaware that approx. 70% of our food is grown as GENETICALLY MODIFIED, herbicide resistant - thus MORE Chemically polluted tha ever..(CORN, SOY, esp)
Japan will not allow any Genetically Modified foods - they will watch the health of th U.S youth to monitor ours!

Check this out:
http://www.thecampaign.org/main_label.php

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]