Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Don't Ignore 'An Inconvenient Truth'

The Progress Report. Posted May 26, 2006.


Polar bears are drowning, Eskimo villages are disappearing, hurricanes are intensifying -- and still, Bush turns a blind eye to the issue of global warming.
Advertisement

Human activity is polluting the earth and if we fail to take action now, our planet could be sent "into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves."

But some of the damage is already done. The Arctic ice shelf is melting, polar bears are drowning, and severe weather occurrences like hurricanes and heat waves are taking thousands of lives and causing millions in damages each year.

In the face of strong scientific consensus on the dangers and sources of global warming, many members of the Bush administration and the right wing continue to insist it is all part of a harmless natural process.

On Wednesday President Bush said, "[L]et's quit the debate about whether greenhouse gases are caused by mankind or by natural causes; let's just focus on technologies that deal with the issue." But an effective solution will not be found without acknowledging the human role in greenhouse gas emissions.

"An Inconvenient Truth," former Vice President Al Gore's new documentary that opened on Wednesday in New York and Los Angeles, challenges these myths and provides striking evidence that "[h]umanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb."

While the situation is severe, it's not hopeless. See how you can take action in the fight against global warming and help America kick its oil habit.

Climate change is here

Nineteen of the 20 hottest years on record have occurred since 1980, with 2005 marking the warmest yet. But proof of global warming goes beyond higher temperatures. In the far north, Inuit hunters have fallen through ice, and villages have lost ground to swelling seas. In the tropics, deluged islanders are making plans for permanent evacuation. Seas worldwide have risen four to eight inches in the last century; Massachusetts alone has lost 65 acres a year. Malaria has spread to higher altitudes in places such as the Colombia Andes, which is 7,000 feet above sea level.

Scientists are considering creating an official Category 6 for hurricanes "as evidence mounts that hurricanes around the world have sharply worsened over the past 30 years -- and all but a handful of hurricane experts now agree this worsening bears the fingerprints of man-made global warming."

A study published in Science Magazine analyzed 928 peer-reviewed scientific papers on global warming published between 1993 and 2003. Not a single one challenged the scientific consensus that the earth's temperature is rising due to human activity. In 2005, a top group of scientists convened by British Prime Minster Tony Blair met and examined the catastrophic impacts of global average temperature increases. The U.S. Climate Change Science Program, an intergovernmental agency, also concluded that humans are driving the warming trend through greenhouse gas emissions, noting "the observed patterns of change over the past 50 years cannot be explained by natural processes alone, nor by the effects of short-lived atmospheric constituents such as aerosols and tropospheric ozone alone."


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Globe?
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 26, 2006 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only bits of the globe that Bush knows about are the ones with oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Living in the Sky Will not Save Earth
Posted by: ChristopherLL on May 26, 2006 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country has used technology and natural resources without any sense of human impact for centuries. This has also become our greatest export and the world has followed. Yet life has become so miserable for the majority that they now live mainly in the "sky" of religious ideology that promises the illusion of a perfect world somewhere off this earth. That leaves very few with their "feet on the ground" which is nature and this planet. But the pesky reality is this planet and the life on it does not depend on our existence but our existence depends absolutely on its survival, both physically and spiritually (spirituality and religiousity are not the same). So, either the vast majority of the population get their heads out of the clouds and look at the earth and realtiy around them or continue down the delusional path of what I hear called "faith" and watch the political, social and physical destrution that will be inexorable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MIKE THOMAS - FUTURE IN OUR HANDS
Posted by: mikethomasfioh on May 26, 2006 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please consider a positive response and visit our web site www.fiohnetwork.org

The Future in Our Hands movement advocates an appropriately simple way a life by the affluent as a primary means of addressing the twin threats of global warming and global poverty.
The dire predicted impacts of global warming will affect everyone. Even if you believe it is already too late, I still believe that a greater focus on values such as sharing, cooperation, fellowship and truth is the route to a healthier and happier and more fulfilling way of life for everyone. This in itself should be sufficient reason for personal change. There is a branch of FIOH in the USA but as yet it is small. Why not help it to grow?
There are two charities affiliated to the UK branch - Plant a Tree in Africa and the FIOH Education and Development Fund. If you donate to either of these you will be helping to relieve poverty in a direct and positive way. FIOH is open to anyone and has no party-political or religious/occult affiliations nor spiritual philosophy.

There will shortly be an option on the PATIA page to offset CO2 emissions by supporting tree planting in Africa - donations to this programme will be dedicated to the planting of new tees, not the replacement of existing ones. However FIOH does not in any way pretend that this is anything but a marginal contribution to the reduction of global warming. A far more radical approach is required.

Mike Thomas, FIOH International Network Coordinator

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we are history
Posted by: solrev on May 26, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not seen the Gore movie yet was there anything about global dimming, the new kid on the pollution block, in it? The Chinese people will be content with full bellies for awhile but they will demand energy in their pursuit of happiness. Human rights you see. When they do, we are going down. This is so easy to prevent. I do not understand why a global catastrophe, that will take thousands of years for the planet to recover from, is necessary. It almost seems like intelligence is an evolutionary dead end. Intel gave us the ability to manage our own ecosystem not simply to exist in one. Intel also produced the seeds of our own destruction, us. I guess we are just smart Lemmings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: we are history Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Bought An Inconvienent Truth Last Night
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 26, 2006 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be reading it this weekend. The movie doesn't arrive here until June. Stay Tuned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is insane to deny global warming.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 26, 2006 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call it by its correct name: insanity. Our President is insane: “Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

It is insane to think that anyone can buy their way out of the destruction of our planet. Not all the money in the world is worth polluted water and air. We have seen it coming for at least 50 years.

The people on Easter Island, before its collapse, also imagined that something was going to come to save them from the elimination of their only resource for fuel, their trees. They consumed them faster than they could be replaced. The island population was nearly wiped out.

We, also, live on an island. Yes, it’s bigger than Easter Island. But it is subject to the same limitations and laws. Global warming is just another step on our way to being wiped out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Naaah, just selfish. Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: "We" must be suicidal? Posted by: Cathyc
Achtung! Unser Fuehrer sagt dass ist Unsinn.
Posted by: ciccio on May 26, 2006 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all know that global warming is nonsense, rampant illogical
left wing fear-mongering. Today's BBC reports that avocado
and olive trees are now growing in London. That obviously has nothing to do with warmer weather, it is all part of itelligent
design.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Intelligent Design? Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Intelligent Design? Posted by: Ratskii
Air Force 2025 Final Report
Posted by: mite on May 26, 2006 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Space Weapons, Weather Control for Military weapons, etc, etc.
Our congress Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995 are bills to allow weather modifications for militay and civilian controls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's done is done...
Posted by: Elmowilcox on May 26, 2006 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hate to sound alarmist, but we're screwed. People resist change at every turn, with that said, there will be no change great enough to offset the current trend. Without a wholesale change in our personal lives as well as changes at every other level of society we ARE going to go the way of the dinosaur. The planet is a massive organism, in which we would be something on the level of a blood disease. The planet will go on, without us if necessary. It has it's own ways of dealing with disease and pestilence the same as we do. Those defenses are the plagues and diseases we deal with everyday and we are witnessing an increase in the magnitude and variety of these ailments every year. We are being offed in a manner of speaking. A scary thing to keep in mind is the whole "slippery slope" line of thinking. Once this thing starts going downhill, it's going to do so exponentially. It's getting a little hotter on average now, in ten years the rate of increase will be double, then in twenty it could be quadruple, and so on in that fashion until we no longer have a habitable environment. My guess is that by century's end there will be a serious movement to becoming mole-people forced to live underground. So stockpile your batteries and invest in Duracell stock today, we are going down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is not the only one in denial...
Posted by: Cathyc on May 26, 2006 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whoever takes their lead from the Bush administration is just as much in denial as they are. Like, if GWB were to say: "Stop driving your gas-guzzling cars etc." - are ye all just going obey him? I don't think so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming is it a problem that can be solved? Maybe by Nuclear power
Posted by: Cerberus on May 26, 2006 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never particularly liked Al Gore; he has always struck me as a person that is extremely careless with facts. I did not weep when he lost the election, he would have made good president, he would have been as weak a president as president Carter were.

Mr Gore now claims that Global Warming is responsible for Katrina and that the extreme hurricane situation is caused by Global Warming. This is in fact as close to a lie as you can come, recent research has shown that the US will face 20-30 years of extreme hurricanes. This is not linked to global warming but to the normal hurricane cycle, it has and will occur over time. Yes, Global Warming might make it worse but only on a smaller scale but to claim that Katrina was caused by Global Warming is in my opinion a gross misrepresentation of facts.

Mr Gore calls for large human interventions. The Kyoto protocol will over a 100 year period delay global warming by 2 years, i.e. what we humans can do will have an impact of less than 2 %. It will have the amazing cost of 0.5 % in less GDP growth.

This does not mean that Global Warming is an issue, however it is an issue that we as humans have no or little control over. Instead of limiting carbon emissions we should do more research on alternative energy sources such as fuel cells and solar power. The first step we can take is to change energy production from oil, coal and gas to nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is clean and causes no Global Warming.

However if you live in a western society you are obliged to try to minimize your personal environmental impact but I may be excused if I find bleeding limousine liberal such as Mr Gore offensive. Poor Rich Guys finding that they have a conscience, a little late is it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Temperature Vs Time for 2,100 years
Posted by: jbohland on May 26, 2006 7:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scroll to slide number 17.

Click here for global warming facts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No such thing as global warming
Posted by: jonwilson on May 26, 2006 8:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this whole global warming this is hilarious. So does my Suburban and my wife's Mercedes SUV.

But back to my point.

How can anyone take seriously a theory based on 100 years of data which ignores billions. It is like trying to take a pulse but only getting a millisecond reading.

And I would like for a believer to explain the fossils of palm trees and lizards found in Antarctica. Did polar bears drive SUV’s?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jon Wilson is amusing. Posted by: Artaraxl
ernestcann
Posted by: ernestcann on May 26, 2006 9:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that so many people still believe the 'myth' that mankind's activities are the 'only' reason that there is 'global warming'!

I have been following this stuff since the early 1970's, and even back then the 'models' that were used were FLAWED!!!

But never mind the 'eco-spiritualist', yes that's right, it is a 'religion', amonst many 'elite' that Mother Earth is more than a fairy tale!

They believe that rocks, yes, that ROCKS are beings just like you!
Now anybody that believes that ceratinly may if they choose, but it is NOT scientific!

Al Gore, my god!
He's one of them!

If any one had read anything, you will soon find out the 'peer-reviewed' literature, is not always a credible source of reliable information, because, it is like Bush et al- 'if you do not agree with us, your stuff WILL NOT be published, nor accepted!'

I strongly urge those who are truly interested in our planets' climate, do something extraordinary...read the other side!!!!!

This planet has went through these phases long before mortal man showed up!!!

And see what you think then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ernestcann Posted by: cooky1257
» Is it just me? Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: Is it just me? Posted by: EventHoriz0n
jmp3954
Posted by: jmp3954 on May 26, 2006 10:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So maybe I'll taste an orange that was from a tree in my backyard before I die . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pat Kittle
Posted by: Pat Kittle on May 27, 2006 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a mad-hatter's tea party of a debate!

On one side we have "free marketeers" mocking environmentalists for being religious, when their holy grail of endless growth is as faith-based as you can get. These are the same types who told us tobacco was good for us for decades after they knew it wasn't. Of course their current "tobacco science" is pathologically absurd to anyone who looks behind their corporate criminal curtain.

On the other side we have "environmentalists" who accept human population growth as inevitable, and forever pursue the fool's errand of mitigating it.

The first thing Al Gore ought to do is acknowledge that reversing population growth should be our top priority, and that means having half (or less!) as many kids as he had (he had four). This does not mean self-flagellation. It does not mean making kids feel guilty for being born.

It means changing course when everything else has failed. It means focusing light on a taboo diverse and powerful (business, church, open-borders, etc.) interests would much prefer to keep in the dark.

Let's face it, even if humans didn't all become saints, a much smaller human population would not be in the worst ecological catastophe in 65,000,000 years.

Environmentalists have an obligation to present honest information about ecological reality, and that means refusing to be intimidated by right-wing or left-wing ignoramouses.

Overbreeding IS overconsuming!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pat Kittle Posted by: alfredo_tomato
Bring it on
Posted by: SadButTrue on May 27, 2006 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How is the death and destruction of humanity a bad thing? Humanity is a viral infection on this planet, global warming is the fever that precipitates the cure. The sooner humanity is eradicated the healthier the planet will be. I wonder if the whales will start a "Save the Humans" campaign? Probably not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bring it on Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Bring it on Posted by: Artaraxl
an inconvenient LIE.
Posted by: dikaiosyne on May 27, 2006 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that you left wing KOOKS give any credence to global warming. Then again that is what makes people left wing KOOKS. A gullibility that defies any sense of logic or proportion is what makes a kook a KOOK. I can remember just a few short decades ago when we were being warned that panet earth was about to be plunged into another ice age and in the blink of an eye timewise I'm being subjected to the latest enviro-kook fad..... global warming. I'll need more convincing proof than the lisping pronouncements of ALGORE to accept the warming theory. Personally I hope I get to see you all DIE from the heat but I expect that the same thing will occur over the remainder of my life. That being exactly nothing. Earth will go on just as it has for all these millenia while ignoring your hysteria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Man! The interlopers abound Posted by: Artaraxl
» RE: Man! The interlopers abound Posted by: dikaiosyne
» RE: an inconvenient LIE. Posted by: alfredo_tomato
The issues are clear, but need high level thinking to understand solutions
Posted by: concerned Canadian on May 28, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the midst of all the struggles and the mucking around in the mire of these past many years, the question still comes to mind: Where and how do the perps expect their children to live, or their grandchildren? As an amoral financial cipher? In an underground shelter? "No man is an island" and no man can live on an island of any size when continuous reckless actvities continue to change our earth into something else through chemical activities. Chemistry acts according to laws, debated theories. We have the technology. What we need is the will. But when the focus of the leaders of this country is on furthering their own agendas - not the well being of their country - then the country suffers. Bush and company simply don't have the ability to engage in high level thinking to understand what it takes to solve the problem. So now what? ok, think of being on a Titanic and , knowing now what we know, how long are you going to listen to the captain tell you that there is no problem. How long? Well, Gore lost the election due to truth and vote counting being manipulated. How long is the American public going to sit still while their ship is headed for the collision with real facts? And who again is at the helm of this ship? You are right if you say noone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nuclear Winter
Posted by: Northernlight on May 29, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't be surprised if in 30 - 40 years from now the country of Republican States of America suggests detonating many hydrogen bombs across it's world empire to start a nuclear winter to counteract the global warming.
Sounds far fetched now but with the mind set of neo-cons.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a question of aesthetics
Posted by: zombi on May 29, 2006 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i found myself more interested in one of the attached articles, by Mr. JASON LEE STEORTS, concerning many of the perceived fallacies behind global warming. personally, even more than the way in which he skirted the FACT that even if major portions of antarctica were receiving record snow fall (due to "slight---repeat slight---rises in the ocean temp.", his own words) it still constitutes a major climactic change. oh, & that "slight" temp change? could it be anything like the "slight" one degree shift in global temps? that ever so "slight" shift, that were it to get anymore "slight" would spell major ecological change. no, even more profoundly deceptive than his skirting of the obvious truths behind his own statements, even more disturbing than the typically spouted industry catch phrases such as "slight changes", i found his inconsistent use of measuring standards oh so enlightening. like when he describes the enviro science claims in terms of feet only to refute their claims in terms of millimeters. wow, those numbers DO appear to be wildly differing don't they. i guess that means that the overwhelming majority of concerned & non-partisan scientists who agree that humanity is having an effect upon the global eco-system should have paid more attention (& used the metric system like every other scien....oh, wait....i guess they probably did....hmmm, i wonder why Mr. Steorts chose to convert the standard?) to the 10% of scientists who work for partisan think tanks. i mean, it only makes sense right? after all, we all know that the more money you have, the more you deserved it & the only reason you'd deserve it, is if you were right, right? beyond even these questions however, one burns in my mind. why? so, global warming may or may not be reality. human impact on the environment may or may not be a reality. the kyoto protocols may or may not be worth the time. for me it is a question of why the hell do you want to destroy the naturally occuring world & pollute everything? on a purely aesthetic level, is it really more pleasing? (that was, again, a purely aesthetic question & NOT an economic one Mr. Steorts). i live in fresno. for those of you who've never visited our fair town (hah) we top the charts for air pollution & we're probably up there w/ water pollution too (LOTS of farms/industry) but i wouldn't know because everyone here knows, YOU DON'T DRINK THE WATER! i've been in places where concrete rules & grass & trees are few & far between (i grew up in anaheim, one word-CLAUSTROPHOBIC, & the city ain't even that damn big). as a walker (i don't drive) i can say that fresh air does, in fact, smell & taste better than a lung full of car exhaust. so, once more, all global panic aside, do you really want concrete & glass & steel & plastic & pollution & dwarf trees perfectly manicured in concrete planters over, say, a pristine beach whose waters you can actually swim in, or a field of wild flowers blooming, or a forest of trees so thick you actually have to walk through it to catch a glimpse of whats inside? i'm sure the Mr. Steorts of the world would still answer yes (they can't seem to wrap their minds around any concept of aesthetics that isn't centered on economics) but then, to them, i would ask, why do you spend so much money on trips to places like the swiss alps, aspen & carribean beaches each year?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1964
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 30, 2006 1:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My boyfriend gave me a few scientific magazines the other day that he took from his grandpa's old house just recently.

One magazine from 1964 has an article in it entitled "Are cold places getting warmer?"

Global warming has been observed for a long, LONG time now and if we don't do something about it, then we really do just deserve to perish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming is fixable in several ways
Posted by: nickptar on May 30, 2006 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See here for ideas. Of course, it's quite as good as conservation, but it can help.

Now why is nobody in the news talking about this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientists have an agenda - the truth
Posted by: launcher on May 30, 2006 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep reading quotes and comments in various media - on a variety of topics - about how "scientists don't agree" or how "theory xx is unproven". In many cases, those assertions are absolutely true. As a scientist myself (I'm a neurophysiologist at a major research university) I can say with great confidence that scientists are a skeptical bunch. They love to argue. They are wary of blind consensus. Their ability to receive funding and publish papers requires that they ask hard and difficult questions - about their own data and theories as well as those of their competitors.

That's why I find it pretty scary that over the past 20 or so years scientists overwhelmingly accept human causes as contributing to global warming. Sure, it's still a theory. But the fact that so many of our world's experts agree with that theory, and continue to collect data that supports a human-factors climate model, is extremely convincing. I'm scared because, from what I know of that model, the predicted climate changes aren't going to be very compassionate to earth dwellers.

The ability of the White House and media to continuously downplay this rare consensus among scientists is frustrating. Do they really think scientists have some sort of secretive and perverse agenda to mislead the public and bask in the type of glory that only overzealous doomsayers enjoy? Whatever their reasons to deny the experts, it's a dangerous path for the world. I could say the same about the evolution/intelligent design debate, but that's for another time.

Go Al.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gift Al Gore's Book to the President!
Posted by: NemoInis on May 31, 2006 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Send the President a present, a complimentary copy of Gore's book, "An Inconvenient Truth." More information can only expand his horizons and help him in future policy decisions and it would be great if he got, say, a few hundred copies from people all over the world, to tell him at least that not everyone agrees with him. For his address and places to get a gift copy sent to him - presentforbush.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Better
Posted by: alfredo_tomato on Jun 1, 2006 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeach, then turn him over to a war crimes tribunal, along with everyone in his junta who went along with his dream of empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Message from a 14 year old
Posted by: EventHoriz0n on Jul 18, 2006 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As you read in the above title, I am 14 years old. I am an aspiring physicist and philosopher. I just wanted to state some clear and to the point data. The Earth itself has been producing HUGE amounts of CO2 before we were here to do anything about it. It has been going through dynamic periods of warming and cooling since it's very beginning. The average output of CO2 by Mother Earth per year is about 200 Billion tons. The average output of CO2 by humans per year is about 7 Billion tons. So we, on average, produce 3.5% of what mother nature does. There are more numbers that make our output look even smaller. I hate to get into conspiracies, but I don't see how we are causing enough of a heating to cause a global crisis. So my point is that the Kyoto protocol would cause more taxes, more government and less freedom, which is what we want as Americans, is it not? No, I am not saying we should trash up the place that was given us to live on, but I don't think we should be pushed by the government to cut such a small portion of emissions into a slightly smaller one and cause so much taxing and more government in the process.

My two cents on the issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

postr
Posted by: usernames on Oct 19, 2006 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheapest viagrapracticed by
vicodin cheap(greater than
Hydrocodone codof receptors,
get xanaxMany countries,
viagra samplesand medical
Phentermine 180or under
Valium without a prescriptionhas also
Valium drugblood to
Hydrocodone online without prescriptionas medicines
Phentermine without prescriptionnarrow margin
Valium mexicois a
Drugs valiumnarrow or
Phentermine 37the Food
Hydrocodone 5 500and prescription
Tramadol srtaken to
Generic hydrocodoneDrugs used
viagra overnightlogos (meaning
Tramadol without a prescriptionindex (close
Mexican hydrocodoneact on
xanax pillspharmacies, by
mexican xanaxwindow. This
viagra 50mgreceptors (which
Tramadol pillto kill
xanax online no prescriptionrestrictions, and
viagra mexicosaid to
Hydrocodone 7.5 500physicians in
buy viagra onlineAre these
vicodin 3596its behaviour
vicodin 500mgmedicine, but
Tramadol prescriptionof medication
Buy tramadolmost persons
Tramadol overnighteffects (desired
vicodin mexico(through the

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]