Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

What Part of 'Global Warming' Don't We Get?

By Bill McKibben, Prairie Writers Circle. Posted October 25, 2005.


It's time for the denial to end, but Washington is governed by a bipartisan consensus that somehow the laws of physics and chemistry don’t apply to us.
Advertisement

Forget about the hurricanes. Put them out of your mind. We'll never know for sure that any particular hurricane is caused by global warming, so just don't think about them. Instead, concentrate on the other evidence for climate change that's appeared recently:  

  • In August, Russian researchers reported that an area of tundra larger than France and Germany combined was rapidly turning into bog as the permafrost melted.
  •  
  • In early September, British researchers reported that warmer temperatures were causing the soil to heat up and dramatically increasing rates of decay. The temperate forests and fields of the United Kingdom are becoming, in essence, semitropical.
  •  
  • In mid-September, researchers reported that arctic sea ice had shrunk by 20 percent. "The feeling is we are reaching a tipping point or threshold beyond which sea ice will not recover," one scientist told reporters.
  •  
  • And in late September, European researchers reported on the biological effects of 2003's record heat wave, the one that killed 15,000 people in France alone. In Italy, they said, corn yields dropped by about 36 percent. Oak and pine also grew more slowly, the study found. In fact, overall there was 30 percent less plant growth that year.
 

What do numbers like these -- all from the best peer-reviewed journals -- show us? That global warming is not some distant problem waiting to appear, some hypothetical trouble we should start preparing for. They show us that the world is already changing with deadly speed. Every time we burn coal and gas and oil, we send carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and now that carbon dioxide is trapping enough heat to create a new planet.  

And what's really scary is that each of these developments will in turn trigger more global warming. They're what scientists call feedback loops. For instance, as the Siberian permafrost melts it releases huge quantities of methane -- at some spots last winter the gas was bubbling up so fast that the bogs didn't freeze in even the coldest weather. And methane is an even more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.  

Meanwhile, as British soils heat and decay speeds up, that decay releases carbon -- enough to offset all the energy-saving changes that Britain has made since 1990. Meanwhile the reductions in plant growth that the Europeans found during the hot summer of 2003 mean fewer trees and plants to soak up the carbon from the atmosphere.  

And up north? White sea ice reflects the sun's rays back to space; when it melts to blue water that heat is now absorbed, increasing warming yet again.  

So far human beings have increased the planet's temperature about 1 degree Fahrenheit. Unless we do everything possible, as quickly as possible, to shift away from fossil fuels, scientists say we will warm the planet another 5 degrees before the century's end. So imagine all those numbers multiplied by five.  

It's about time for denial to come to an end. We're no longer talking about theory, about computer models of what might happen. We're talking about what is happening, all around the world, with almost unimaginable speed. Other countries have at least begun to try to deal with the problem, implementing small first steps like the Kyoto Protocol. But here in the United States, there's only a scattering of state and local measures. Washington is governed by a bipartisan consensus that somehow the laws of physics and chemistry don't apply to us.  

But they do. I said I wasn't going to talk about the hurricanes, but I lied. In early August a paper by a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher in the journal Nature showed that hurricanes were 50 percent stronger and lasted 60 percent longer than a generation ago. In early September a Georgia Tech team showed that the number of category 4 and 5 storms had doubled. You've seen the results on every TV screen and magazine cover.  

Exactly how much more do we need to know? Exactly when are we going to roll up our sleeves and get to work?

Digg!

Bill McKibben is the author of "The End of Nature" and "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age." He wrote this essay for the Land Institute's Prairie Writers Circle, Salina, Kan.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Seizing is believing
Posted by: Meremark on Oct 25, 2005 1:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill, I just believe what it takes is for us to see our own power. And, when we are holding it, to see that we give ourselves permission, and it is okay.

Collectively, we could elect a slate of 435 seats to the House in '06.

Throw D's and R's aside, run 10 or 100 candidates in every primary -- just people stepping forward and saying I want to run for Congress and my platform is 'Impeach.' Changing our carbon energy release goes against everything corporatism has built --including our 'jobs,' on oil, (which is only a hundred years so the old ways are recent), and shoving aside and working around corrupt entire political parties like D's and R's, (oh, wait, that's one party), is a small matter for focused minds, compared to the big corrupt inertias we have to move aside.

That's it !! MoveOn oughta change to MoveAside.

On an individual scale, we see our own power when we seize the present moment, and give ourselves permission to live right -- mindful and playful, seeing our predicament, seeing our foolishness.

Oh, it is all so large a shift, the whole world. But we've got the internet and we've got each other and that is enough to do it. Rolling up our sleeves may come soon; for now it seems to be rolling out our greetings and to know we know each other.

Here's a FABULOUS introduction piece: "Waiting for the Lights to Go Out."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seizing is believing Posted by: amadeus
Hurricanes
Posted by: adp3d on Oct 25, 2005 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And in this record season, it is the warm water that drives these storms...but hey, with faith-based science and intelligent design, those of us who are believers will be spared...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hurricanes Posted by: SbgBJ
believing
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Oct 25, 2005 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry to toss cold wawa in here,but the the religious folks still have their heads up their bibles & Shrubbs butt , as long as they think he's doin the lords work (saving wee babies and keeping the gays from the family pets) why shucks everything is just fine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: believing Posted by: commonMan
The Hidden Cost of (Relatively) Cheap Gas
Posted by: hagwind on Oct 25, 2005 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The market economy does have its virtues, but one of its huge liabilities is that it encourages short-term thinking. Not all that long ago, hardly anyone considered the cost of disposing of all those "planned obsolescent" goods, because that cost wasn't factored into the price. Even now, when many of us pay per barrel to get rid of our non-recyclable trash, plenty of people believe that a thing's real cost is accurately reflected by the price. Many of us don't see the real cost of those deep-discounted goods at Wal-Mart or Behemoth Bookstores either. (Devastated town centers, unlivable wages, the die-off of independent bookstores . . .) Bill McKibben knows this, and most of the rest of us know it, at least in theory. Global warming is distant and abstract and not reflected in the price of what we pay for things, like gas and motor vehicles. The only way our gas-guzzling society is going to pay attention is if the price charged reflects the damage being done and the cost of fixing it. How do we make that happen? Damned if I know. I've never been able to think like an economist, even when I was studying economics. And since "the American Way of Life" seems to mean "the right to consume whatever we want, whenever we want," the prognosis looks pretty grim.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Source for quote?
Posted by: gpm on Oct 25, 2005 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless we do everything possible, as quickly as possible, to shift away from fossil fuels, scientists say we will warm the planet another 5 degrees before the century's end.

Does anybody have the citation for the study that found this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Source for quote? Posted by: decembrist
» Thanks! Posted by: gpm
Sorry to be the devil's advocate here, but...
Posted by: shim on Oct 25, 2005 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The statistics (refs?) you bullet-point at the onset of your article suggest that global temperatues are rising. This may be so, but the more contentious issue isn't whether or not the temperature is rising, it's whether or not human emmissions of CO2 have had a significant role in that change. That has not yet been proven.

Either way, I suport further research in this area, but spending billions trying to cut emissions would be an unfortunate use of funds that could, instead, be used to figure out what the cause of global warming is (human-caused or natural process?), whether it's really happening, and whether there's anything we can do about it.

Perhaps, in the end, we should be trying to adapt to these changes in climate instead of fighting them -- especially if the climate change is due to a natural process, in which case there's a good chance we can't affect it either way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Citations? Posted by: gpm
» RE: Citations? Posted by: Colin
» No apology needed. Posted by: gpm
Main stream media dumbing down America.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 25, 2005 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How are people to understand global warming when they have no information coming to them regarding the increase in CO2 increasing 50% in parts per million over the last 50 years, or the effects of methane in exposed peat bogs being the worst of green house gases and the lack of photographic evidence over the last 140 years, the bleaching of coral reefs over the last several decades, or the heavy loss of nearly 30% of creatures that are used as a monitor regarding the health of our ecosystem, or the knowledge of why Venus is so hot that no vehicle can land there and last more than a few minutes, or that when the US downed all planes that the temperature in the atmosphere dropped and visibility increased, or that some scientists are being paid by this administration to make up information to show that this is not really happening and putting it out to the wire services as news, or that the information from scientists show that this is a phenomenon that may have been going on for a long time but not near the rate that is exponentially higher than the previous several thousand years and is progressively getting worse in the last century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's alot they don't get
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Oct 25, 2005 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They don't get our impact on the environment,they don't understand generations of piosoning both past and future,they don't understand premature death by breathing
polluted air,birth defects,cancer of mutations. Why? They're
too busy raking in the money for letting these crimes against all Life continue. Big 'Biznuss' pay out large to give us the business. With big Govt playing lapdog and lackey. The answer is simple,STOP ELECTING THESE GREEDY IDIOTS.
I know it's kind of hard to do when the country's election system is rigged. Well screw the ballot machine. Find and make people that are'nt corupt 'write-in' candidates. Every political position can be 'earned' this way. The fact is we got this way because we don't have a 'Non-support' vote on the ballots. That would force any party that wants to be administrater general to make their platforms as well as their actions more broadbased. They're not going to change until most of us are using gas masks to get around. We do have time. NOW! Stop Working For Pollution Plants. Unions start demanding environmentally safe working conditions and emmissions. Elected ones...get off your ass! It's your Great-grand Daughter who'll die from lung ailments you failed to protect her from while you were dealing with lobby-ists' influence money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reinsurance
Posted by: osisbs on Oct 25, 2005 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Three years ago Swiss RE, the world's largest reinsurance company formed a division whose job is to study global warming and limit their exposure to it. Last week, Allstate said it was pulling out of the gulf states. The global reinsurance business is three times as large as the global oil business. We don't need to curb greenhouse gasses, but we'll need to find a way to live without insurance and people wanting to live on the beach will be doing it without a net. Good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GAO STUDY RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
Posted by: driver8 on Oct 25, 2005 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress will not even budget the money REQUIRED TO PAY ATTENTION!! look here- this OUR congress:(
http://www.house.gov/science/press/109/109-131.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Increase of CO2 in Earth's Atmosphere is due to Mankind's Emissions
Posted by: MikeDEarthman on Oct 25, 2005 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The graph of CO2 parts/million that is based on data taken in Hawaii since the 1950s is well known. For the last 20 years, the increase in CO2 has averaged approximately 1.5 parts/million. This is equivalent to an increase of 7.5 Trillion Kilograms per year. Databases show that the total emission of CO2 by all countries, over the last twenty years, has averaged approximately 20 Trillion Kilograms per year. This match, within a factor of 2, strongly suggests that the observed increase of CO2 in the atmosphere is due to the production of CO2 by the human race.

Michael J Dalterio
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Natural Sciences Department
Bentley College
Waltham, MA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Info... Part One
Posted by: SbgBJ on Oct 25, 2005 2:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The scientific evidence is clear: human activities, e.g. burning fossil fuels, have negatively altered the global climate. Just this summer, the US National Academy of Sciences - and the scientific academies of the other G8 nations as well as Brazil, China and India - issued a statement saying there was strong evidence that significant global warming was happening and that "it is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities".

The report, "Meeting the Climate Challenge," recently issued by the International Climate Change Task Force, co-chaired by Tony Blair confidant, Stephan Byers, and U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine states:

"The countdown to climate-change catastrophe is spelt out by a task force of senior politicians, business leaders and academics from around the world -- and it is remarkably brief. In as little as 10 years, or even less, their report indicates, the point of no return with global warming may have been reached… This point will be two degrees centigrade above the average world temperature prevailing in 1750 before the industrial revolution, when human activities -- mainly the production of waste gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), which retain the sun's heat in the atmosphere -- first started to affect the climate. But it points out that global average temperature has already risen by 0.8 degrees since then, with more rises already in the pipeline -- so the world has little more than a single degree of temperature latitude before the crucial point is reached."
Quoted from:
linked text

Many Americans have repeatedly asked our Big Oil-beholden government to take constructive action to keep this horror scenario from happening. Instead, the People’s “representatives” are irresponsibly preferring to go down in history as American Neros, helping their industry cronies earn one more fast buck as our ecological house of cards collapses (while constantly issuing shrill warnings about the much lesser danger of terrorism).
As informed voters, We the People, must stand up and defend our planet’s life-sustaining ecological security before it is too late. Future generations (of all species) need us to do our duty and defend them from our own stupidity.
Homo sapiens, indeed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Info Part Two
Posted by: SbgBJ on Oct 25, 2005 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps if we paid more attention...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 25, 2005 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to the results of this study, we'd be able to make some progress on this front:

Today on EWM, a scientific shocker: Study: Euthanizing Right-wing Pundits would Solve Global Warming

But it's just a theory you know...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why wait for an election for change????
Posted by: Farmertim on Oct 25, 2005 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it a bit odd that if we remove all the morons from the electorate and replace them with people who we think will do the job...just who are the morons???????
It is not a given right that we are governed by responsible people and why the hell wait to make change.
Change could start tommorrow morning if people just gave a crap about sacrifice and having to change themselves except electing people to change conditions for them.
its the very reason we are in this situation in the first place, and the government on all levels know this.
things to do that would change the world tommorrow morning!

1. don't buy anything that is made or manufactured overseas
reason carbon emissions, fuel to move it lax regulations in the country that made it.
2. don't eat anything from over seas
reason same as above + 6000 (i think) acres of forrest a day burned for cattle pasture to grow beef that arrives at your store for 1.85 a pound.
3. better yet eat what is grown within 100 miles of where you live.
reason all of the above minus 1315 miles less for your food to travel, plus the gas to transport imigrants to the fields to pick it cheap.
better yet don't buy anything for three days, if only 10% of the US population did this it would throw wal-mart into a coma.
4. car pool.. yes its a pain so is global warming and the idea of telling your grandchildren your sorry for using all the energy when you could have sat next to the guy in a car you really didn't like.
5. change 3 light bulbs in your house to hi effecient bulbs and do that every month till they all are changed.
6. turn the lights you do have that you are not using OFF when not using them
7. don't do christmas lights this year
reason DUH!!! and the 2000 th soldier has died just so you could....
its not hard and it really doesn't hurt to take matters in your own hands and except responsibility for our actions...
lord knows its the last thing elected officials will do any time soon...
be brave, do good work, & keep in touch
Tim

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming = the end of Megastores –– eventually.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 25, 2005 9:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One little sliver of poetic justice that I can find in the mess the world in general – and America in particular – has become, is that when the cost of fossil fuel becomes prohibitive, Wal-Fart won't be abe to afford to ship all that cheap plastic s**t from China any longer. Maybe then we'll be forced to buy only what we need, not what we think we want – and buy locally to boot. Oh, yeah. . .and fix what's broken instead of adding to landfills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ice age
Posted by: Nepherditi on Nov 11, 2005 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a very big believer in global warming. While I cannot deny that the planet is warming up, I do not believe that we had much to do with it. I think that we are just still warming up from the last ice age. Scientists don't know how warm the planet was before the last ice age. The planet goes through a cycle: it started really warm and tropical (dinosaurs), then there was an ice age, then we are warming up again. Maybe the planet's going back to warm and tropical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]