Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Car Owners in the Driver's Seat

By Felix Kramer, AlterNet. Posted August 25, 2005.


Hybrid car enthusiasts have stoked their passion through online discussion communities. Those groups are now shaping the future of the automobile.
Advertisement

The hybrid wave that's taken car makers by surprise continues to astound the world with its vitality and its unexpected turns. Clearly, a growing number of Americans want cleaner, better cars.

"Outsiders" have long wanted a say about the kinds of cars produced in this country. But the industry's insiders -- car makers, the oil industry and the federal government -- are still firmly planted behind the wheel. But some outsiders have had at least limited success, not the least of whom are Buckminster Fuller, Preston Tucker, Ralph Nader, Paul MacCready, Amory Lovins and William McDonough. (These links are to their auto-related activities; all these visionaries also have excellent profiles at Wikipedia.)

We may be in the midst of what scientists call a "punctuated equilibrium" as the auto industry rapidly evolves. And catalyzing it are groups of outsiders, spearheaded by the legions of individual car buyers who've snapped up gas-electric hybrids in recent years and led to months-long waiting lists for the Toyota Prius. Some very recent developments in Toyotaland include:

  • Four self-described "middle-aged hybrid drivers" staged a two-day LeMans-style race to see how far they could drive a Prius on a tank of gasoline. Using "pulse and glide" techniques (as described at HybridCars.com by Kip Munro), they got 110MPG. After an initial silence, Toyota found the good sense to applaud the group and send them goodies.
  • Toyota representatives asked by journalists about their reactions to Prius conversions began to sound increasingly open-minded. The pressure increased when they got criticism about the MPG of Lexus and Highlander hybrids. (See the CalCars News Archive.)
  • RAV4 EV owners and other electric vehicle advocates organized DontCrush.com, rallied and worked for months to gain support from public officials. Their campaign succeeded: Toyota agreed to extend leases and allow lease buyouts for these cherished electric compact SUVs.
  • Attention to plug-in hybrids ratcheted up significantly as advocacy streams for environment, energy security and economic development met at an intersection called "record-high oil prices."

These breakthroughs wouldn't have happened if we weren't all so "plugged in." As interactive media have claimed turf alongside the top-down print and broadcast outlets that bloggers call "MSM" -- the Mainstream Media -- car culture has morphed.


Digg!

Felix Kramer is the founder of CalCars.org, The California Cars Initiative, and has been promoting 99+ MPG plug-in hybrids full-time since 2001. A version of this op-ed appears as the inaugural entry for his Blog at hybridcars.com Power, Plugs and People

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ok nice article
Posted by: flatulence6 on Aug 25, 2005 1:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have nothing against cars that reduce the amount spent on gas every month. As a capitalist, this is an idea worthy of my attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ok nice article Posted by: lake_archuleta
Finally - Car owners lead the way!!!
Posted by: ggmurray on Aug 25, 2005 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Successful car manufacturers will push the envelope of this emerging technology. People want a way to keep moving and get off oil. Way to go Toyota!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jimbo
Posted by: Jimbo on Aug 25, 2005 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Electrogas hybrids are weak. Im waiting for Hydrogen fueled cars. That is the ultimate. I doubt Ill see it in this or the next few life times though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jimbo Posted by: lake_archuleta
» RE: Jimbo Posted by: Shehova
Car culture needs to be eliminated, not "morphed"
Posted by: dankorn on Aug 25, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great that there are so many people working to change the automobile industry. However, I do not believe that the solutions to the problems of dependency on foreign oil or greenhouse gas emissions will be solved by simply building better cars.

It takes a huge amount of energy to move thousands of pounds of metal, and even if that energy is stored in a battery, it ultimately will come from sources that will contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Even if the energy sources are completely renewable, the transmission and storage devices are not. And even if we replaced every gasoline-powered private automobile on the roads today with an electric or hybrid model, they would still require more energy than we could possibly produce in a sustainable way.

The pro-hybrid crowd says that hybrids are a baby step in the right direction. But "baby steps" and "green" cars will do nothing to solve the problems of urban sprawl, loss of natural and agricultural lands, destruction of communities, and over 40,000 automobile crash fatalities a year in the U.S. alone. And all that asphalt and concrete contributes to groundwater contamination, industrial and agricultural runoff, and flooding.

If these pro-hybrid campaigns are successful, there will only be more cars on the roads, being driven more miles, which will of course require more roads and parking lots. And so more communities will be designed around the automobile, and there will be fewer options for people to get around. Thus the cycle of automobile dependency is perpetuated, and the world gets paved over, one lane and parking space at a time.

Instead of coming up with new ways to keep all the cars running, and to move thousands of pounds of metal to transport ourselves to work every day, let's focus our creative energies on building communities where people can take advantage of real transportation options, including mass transit, cycling, and even walking. Imagine a world where kids can walk or ride a bike to school, and where cars are the last transportation option, not the first.

We don't have to be dependent on automobiles. We have a real chance to make a change. The choice is ours, but we have to think outside of the metal box, even the hybrid one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hybrid illusions
Posted by: agent_theory on Aug 25, 2005 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In reality, hybrids create as many problems as they solve. For example, the batteries are highly toxic, and nobody has even proposed a means for dealing with mountains of used hybrid batteries, should the vehicles become widely popular.

Also, real-world hybrid mileage is nowhere near the numbers that manufacturers advertise. Some conventional engines have emissions and mileage comparable to hybrids.

Many people also believe that hybrids and fuel cells are the same thing, but of course they are completely different.

In short, hybrids amount to little more than feel-good cars for insincere environmentalists. Real energy solutions will require a commitment to public transportation, but that is another topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hybrid illusions Posted by: Kat144
Thanks for the comments so far
Posted by: felixkramer on Aug 25, 2005 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that more efficient and eventually zero-carbon cars don't solve the issues of how society is physically organized. In his book, Natural Capitalism (you can get it at naturalcapitalism.org), Amory Lovins does a good job of linking smart growth and clean cars, as do others.

People have lots of misconceptions about electric batteries -- we provide links showing that current nickel-metal hydride batteries are not toxic in the CalCars FAQ, which also points to many other related resources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I call bull.
Posted by: nickptar on Aug 26, 2005 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see how this could be a net energy gain, as splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen needs much more energy than you get out (duh), and the site doesn't seem to contain a coherent description of how it works. If it injects hydrogen into the engine, sure you'd get a power boost and need less gas, but what does that have to do with fuel cells? Plus, the site looks like an ad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]