Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Environment

Oil Companies Discover 'Sustainability'

By Charles I. Burch, Prairie Writers Circle. Posted July 30, 2005.


The companies have yet to admit that no scheme for providing sustainable energy can rely on petroleum.
Advertisement

Sustainability is big in corporate America today. The word, that is. Once an arcane term used chiefly by foresters and agricultural researchers, "sustainable" has become the label of choice that executives use to describe their businesses.

Perhaps the most laughable of the newly "sustainable" corporations are the oil companies. Pumping a finite resource like oil out of the ground must be one of the least sustainable endeavors on the planet. But this doesn't bother the oil industry, which knows a powerful public relations word when it sees one.

The most recent ConocoPhillips annual report has a section titled "Technology Achieving Long-term Sustainability," and the CEO writes of the company's "sustainable growth plan." Annual reports from ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil speak of "sustainable development." And BP and Shell issue reports on the sustainability of their operations. There are even auditors willing, for a fee, to vouch for the statements in these "sustainability" reports.

All this when Arthur R. Green, lecturer for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists and former chief geoscientist of ExxonMobil, says world oil production is nearing its peak.

The history of U.S. oil production is instructive.

Domestic oil output steadily rose until it peaked in 1970. Since then production has declined despite the technological know-how of domestic oil companies and the considerable incentive of high prices. Domestic oil production in 2003 was less than 60 percent of its 1970 level.

To meet our demand we import foreign oil. More than 56 percent of what we used in 2003 came from other countries, and the proportion increases every year.

Increase, taper off, then decrease -- world oil production will follow the same pattern. Some experts think world output is very near its peak already, while others say the peak will arrive sometime between now and 2050.

Five complications make this grim picture even bleaker.

First, the world's largest oil reserves tend to be in countries with unstable governments. Unrest can disrupt supply.

Second, insiders have been suspicious for some time about oil reserve figures claimed by certain Middle Eastern countries. In 1987 the United Arab Emirates claimed reserves of 33 billion barrels; in 1988 they claimed 98 billion barrels, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Iraq and some other Middle Eastern countries also reported similarly implausible sudden increases. These figures probably owe more to politics than sound science.

Third, China, until 1993 a net oil exporter, now imports more than 40 percent of its oil and is the world's third largest importer, after the United States and Japan. With 1.3 billion people, one-fifth of the world's population, and an economy that has quadrupled since 1978, China is developing a world-class thirst for oil. China and the rest of Asia now consume about as much oil as the United States.

Fourth, as demand climbs past supply, already high oil prices will rise even higher. The "energy crisis" of the 1970s showed how sensitive overall inflation, interest rates and the stock market are to increased oil prices. The oil squeeze will not just raise the cost of energy. It will affect the entire economy.

Fifth, even as oil becomes more scarce, development of replacement fuels remains on the back burner. Do not expect the oil companies to do more than token research on other fuels. True, they do have experience taking on large projects and have sophisticated ways of analyzing risk. But their investment and expertise are in petroleum.

If an oil company makes a genuine sustainability breakthrough -- figuring out, for example, how to make hydrogen efficiently with solar power -- you can be sure the company will publicize this rather than promote the pleasant fiction that its current operations are sustainable. The reality is that no scheme for providing energy sustainably can rely on petroleum.

But do not expect to hear that from oil executives.

Digg!

Charles Burch was a senior staff scientist at Conoco before retiring in 2002. He wrote this essay for the Land Institute's Prairie Writers Circle, Salina, Kan.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Environment! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
all power solar...
Posted by: dp1228 on Jul 30, 2005 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point of this article, that petroleum simply cannot be a sustainable source of energy, is extremely important and a fundamental idea that all humans need to grasp as quickly as possible. I don't think any of us can truly fathom what our world would be like if petro stocks were to crash and leave us without alternatives, but it's something that we must consider because that's the path we're on.

A concept that does not recieve much mention is that all of our energy other than geothermal and nuclear was once solar energy. It was the sun's energy that plants trapped millions of years ago that was entrained in fossil fuels. Our weather responsible for wind, tidal, and hydropower is driven by the sun's energy.

The ticket to sustainability is undoubtedly through the use of solar power whether it's in the form of biofuels (solar power harnessed by plants), wind, tidal, hydropower, or solar cells we need to concentrate on developing methods to efficiently harvest this energy and make it sustainably portable by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen. It's the only way to get our carbon cycle back in check and maintain a lifestyle close to what we've become accustomed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: all power solar... Posted by: kittynboi
Technology will phase out fossil fuels
Posted by: FlapJackSeven on Jul 30, 2005 3:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then what we will have to complain about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

right to the last drop
Posted by: Michiganman on Jul 30, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alot of people pretty much realizes the oil giants won't begin to utilize true alternative energy technology until the last drop of oil is sucked from the ground. Don't kid yourselves, they have the technology to abandon oil RIGHT NOW. They are just waiting for that last oil dollar to come in. And a pretty penny it will bring! Then they will complain that they have the technology to replace oil but it will be expensive. Unless alternatives are brought forth now to work out the bugs which would make an easy transition. Of course a desperate transition at the last minute would be much more profitable, rotten bast..ds!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

at least Iraq will have power!
Posted by: Don Garb on Jul 30, 2005 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All those billions of US dollars being spent in Iraq to reconstruct state of the art electrical infrastructure! At least we can feel good as we harness up the horse for the 2 day ride to WalMart that our Iraqi brothers and sisters have dependable energy systems! It was worth the 500 billion dollars we gave to them! Green heads like Ralph Nader and Boob Geldoff will whine and complain that that money COULD have been spent making Mighty America self sufficient with renewable sources for it's energy needs. Bah! What kind of crack are these peaceniks smoking?! The constitution needs another ammendment: every American has the right to every other countries oil! Damn the Chinese! If we want the oil then we get it first! If they had any balls they'd cash in their t-bills and ask for it to be paid in Euros, but they don't! Our superior intelligence services and covert agents have taken care of them! Just like with Italy! America owns the entire world! For as long as it's alive ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: at least Iraq will have power! Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
» RE: at least Iraq will have power! Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: at least Iraq will have power! Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
And if that's not enough trouble ...
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 30, 2005 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David Sirota nails Congress

Congress Creates Incentive to Gas Guzzle

That my friends is your amoral Congress at work. I didn't know being conservative meant being anti-conserving and pro-waste.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slow down and Live
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 30, 2005 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You bet wind,solar,hydro and tidal electric systems could provide our energy needs,worldwide,but the energy hogs of the world are going to have to learn to use less of it.The fact that highrise buildings don't make use of the incredible winds
roarimg through these man-made canyons proves our childish approach to energy generation and our incredible
greed in supporting such harmful fuels like coal,gas,nuclear and diesel. It also proves the People have been boondoggled into supporting politicians that help perpetuate the global
poisoning of every living thing. Energy money puts the smoothe image we citizens are forced to choose from. For the
life of all who are here now and those great-grandchildren of
the great-grandchildren we will never know we must convert to clean energy for the air and water. Air power cars to clean city air.Sure they're slower than gas,but in a crash 40 mph you're sure to survive.Not so true at 65-75mph.Truth is the way power is generated,we waste more energy through over
production of voltage,the true power in electricty. If we can wire up an RV to run on 24 volts and have a microwave, AC,
TV, stereo CD and cookstove there's no reason we can't have self sustaining wind/solar powered homes.Excepting for greed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Slow down and Live Posted by: LyttonsPen
» Synthetic oil Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Slow down and Live Posted by: bornxeyed
We are already at least 30 years behind if not 60.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jul 30, 2005 9:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HEMP is one way to go. Food, fuel, and fiber. Corporate america put this plant down so long ago most have forgotten all it can provide.

It can provide excellent construction material thus saving forests. It can provide bio diesel fuel. It makes a longer lasting paper and fabric that also uses far less if any chemicals in it's production. Cotton uses more herbicides and pesticides (petro-based) than any other crop but hemp does not really require any. The seeds are also a very nutritous food.

Hemp is sustainable!

I just watched "Hemp for Victory!" the other day. It's sickly amusing to see the USDA demonstrating how great it is considering how the government views it now.

I hope Mellon, Anslinger, Dupont, and Hearst are all rotting in hell for greed and protectionism they used against this plant. I also hope all these other scumbag corporate wealthfare mothers and fascist politicians we have now will join them soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Leaders help you deal with the truth
Posted by: ggmurray on Jul 31, 2005 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a real leader would draw on the courage and initiative of the American people by saying something everyone could understand, like:
1. We have a serious energy problem and it's not going away soon. We can no longer rely on foreign oil and must phase out our use of it for transportation and heating.
2. We need to invest massive dollars and human energy in discovering and using natural, non-polluting forms of energy. These may vary depending on where you live: wind, geothermal, solar, hydrogen, etc. And other fuels yet to be discovered.
3. Energy industries will be the cutting edge technology and economic engine for the foreseeable future. This will be a global research initiative, drawing on the best scientific minds in the world.
4. For now, every homeowner should discover how to apply known energy saving methods and materials to their own home: super insulation, skylights and solar windows, dressing warmly indoors in winter, saving gasoline by carpooling and other techniques. These may sound unglamorous, but they will be necessary.
5. Every home should have a stockpile of non-perishable foods, water, and basic medical supplies.
6. Neighbors should no longer be strangers, but should stand ready to help each other. This may be the biggest change of all.
7. The end result of this effort will be locally generated fuel, suitable for every home, apartment, primitive hut, and transportation vehicle.

Personally, I think this is likely to be hydrogen fuel, since even now it can be derived from water using a solar panel. But we shall see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This thread is full of ..... science fiction
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 31, 2005 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neighbors? I don't even know my neighbors' names and haven't during the whole of my now long lifetime as a city dweller.

The problem with technological proposals is they assume citizens will work together the way employed engineers do. Hell, if we could do that we would have a future. Our whole problem is and always has been one of working together. We don't have a future.

Global warming is a technologically caused problem. Yet technologists haven't been able to agree that it even exists, let alone where it is coming from. The reason our current, extremely wasteful, economy persists is because it's dog-eat-dog, and we know how to do that, lettings the little dogs fall between the cracks.

Bush got elected because most of us believe 'might makes right.' How has technology altered that? How is that different than 'believe in scientific results'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» *Lubricating* oil? Posted by: nickptar
» RE: *Lubricating* oil? Posted by: LyttonsPen