Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Country First? Not for Republicans

By David Sirota, AlterNet. Posted September 12, 2008.


As the RNC revealed, jingoism, partisanship, and Bible-thumping social conservatism seem to have priority over 'country' in the conservative mindset.
Advertisement

Let's say that you enjoyed watching last week's Republican National Convention on television.

Let's say you drank in the almost uniformly white faces and the regimented revivalism, you clapped when speakers belittled Barack Obama's work organizing impoverished communities, indeed, you cheered with Rudy Giuliani's zinger, "Drill, baby, drill!"

Let's further stipulate that you were not at all discomfited by the convention's incessant "Country First" mantra that defines loyalty to America as lockstep fealty to the Republican Party.

Let's say -- for sheer argument's sake, of course -- all of this is true. What, then, of the substance? Stripping away the partisanship, passion and propaganda, what about the veracity of the claim that the GOP puts this country first?

Well, let's just say it's a little dicey.

On national security, the Republican Party advocates continuing to force thousands of young Americans to risk life and limb refereeing Iraq's civil war. Though the party's slogan hearkens back to conservatives' "America First" isolationism, the GOP nonetheless supports spending $12 billion a month on the war -- money needed at home.

Same story on economics. In 2004, the Republican White House called outsourcing "a plus." In 2006, the Republican commander-in-chief okayed the sale of critical infrastructure to foreign dictators. And today the Republican presidential nominee is demanding more NAFTA-style trade pacts that eliminate American jobs. This, says the GOP, is putting our country first.

But who is the "country"? According to the Census Bureau, it will soon be mostly non-whites. That is, the demographic groups who the alleged "country first" party regularly disparages, whether Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., yearning for a return to segregation, Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., scapegoating Latinos, Rep. Howard Coble, R-N.C., celebrating Japanese internment, President Bush genuflecting to Bob Jones University's white supremacists, or Ronald Reagan echoing bigoted rallying cries at the scene of Mississippi race murders.

Maybe, you insist in your post-convention fervor, I just don't get it. Maybe "country first" really does mean refereeing foreign civil wars, spending billions overseas while cutting domestic programs, exporting jobs and bashing ethnic groups that will soon comprise the majority of the nation.

But I don't think so. More likely, Republicans have simply taken the famous parable to heart -- the one about patriotism being the last refuge of scoundrels.

As a political strategy, it's not stupid. Following the Bush-DeLay-Abramoff era, many Americans rightly think Republican politicians are scoundrels. And so those politicians are trying to make sure "this election is not about issues," as John McCain's campaign manager said this week, but about a hideous hypernationalism only Joe McCarthy could love. Employing flag pins, war stories and Bible-thumping social conservatism, former P.O.W. McCain and Christian fundamentalist Sarah Palin hope their red-white-and-blue phantasmagoria will hypnotize America into voting Republican.

Such desperation leads to seeming incoherence at times. For instance, when anti-war protesters at the GOP convention demanded lawmakers actually put country first by bringing the troops home, Republican delegates responded like an entranced mob of cultists, mindlessly chanting "U.S.A."

Then again, in the Karl Rove age, every televised scene -- no matter how absurd -- is part of sculpting an election victory with a mallet of jingoism and a chisel of intolerance.

On the seventh anniversary of the 9/11 atrocities, the Republican convention reminds us of what Barry Goldwater suggested 44 years ago: Terrorists are not the only ones who believe extremism is "no vice." And, as the old aphorism warns, when the most virulent extremism attacks our country, it won't be shrouded in Islamic fatwas -- it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross.

Sadly, the when is now. McCain is the flag, Palin is the cross -- and Americans will have to decide whether we believe their zealotry puts country first.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: republicans, mccain, palin

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What "country" really means . . .
Posted by: eaanders on Sep 12, 2008 5:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Republicans say, "County First", what they really mean is, "Country Bumpkins First!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

End race-baiting on FAUX - Can you help get this out?
Posted by: foreverhope on Sep 12, 2008 6:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
calling out Fox on its pattern of racist smears against Senator Obama and Black people in general. We need to send a strong, clear message to Fox executives that weak apologies won't pacify us--- we want the race-baiting and fear-mongering to end.
Fox is a huge corporation and they need to feel a huge push-back from us---so we need as many voices as possible. Can you ask your friends and family to join our call?

Below you'll find a brief letter you can send. Personalize it as you wish or write your own, but please send it along right away. Also, please only contact people who know you personally. Spam will hurt the effort.


You can cut and paste the text below into an email message:


Dear Friends,

Right now, Fox News is trying to paint Barack Obama as foreign, un-American, suspicious, and scary. They're trying to send Americans the message that our country's first viable Black candidate for President is not "one of us."

I've joined on to ColorOfChange.org's campaign to push back on Fox, publicly demanding they stop their race-baiting and fear mongering. If that doesn't work, then we'll go to their advertisers and the FCC. I wanted to invite you to sign on as well. It takes only a moment:

http://www.colorofchange.org/foxobama/?id=2039-652685

Here's what happened recently:

After Senator Obama won the nomination, he and his wife gave each other a "pound" in front of the cameras. Fox anchor E.D. Hill called the act of celebration a "terrorist fist jab." Then last week, a Fox News on-screen graphic referred to Michelle Obama as "Obama's baby mama"--slang used to describe the unmarried mother of a man's child. It was a clear attempt to associate the Obamas with negative cultural stereotypes about Black people, an insult not only to Michelle Obama but to women and Black people everywhere.

After each of the incidents mentioned, Fox issued some form of weak apology. But what does it mean when you slap someone in the face, apologize the next day, then slap them again on the third? It means the apology is meaningless.

These aren't one-time incidents--they're part of a pattern that continues no matter how often Fox is forced to apologize. Fox has a clear record of attacking and undermining Black institutions, Black leaders, and Black people in general.

If we don't push back now, we will see more of the same from now until November. Please join me in helping to bring an end to Fox's behavior.

http://www.colorofchange.org/foxobama/?id=2039-652685

Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Embarrassed for America
Posted by: kiwijohn on Sep 12, 2008 7:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have read this article in full and understood some of it your IQ is definitely >80. If you have read it and now understand the sad, sad story of our fellow Republican citizens your IQ is probably > 100, you have academic credentials and/or street smart intuition. Not that IQ is everything, but what the majority of thoughtful human beings on this planet are now very worried about is that the dumb half of the United States will prevail in this election. And as for the reported reappearance of Monty Python's Dead Parrot (the Norwegian now Alaskan Blue) in Juneau. God help us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bibles and Guns
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Sep 13, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Wrapped in a flag, clutching a Bible."

The very definition of fascism.

The Republican dream ticket is now complete.

Indeed, white trash Palin's nickname is appropriate: Moosilini. After all, she's now on record as stating that she's a lifelong member of the NRA, supports the sale of AK-47s to citizens and is in complete agreement about shooting animals from helicopters.

Follow the money. Find out where the gulags will be built.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They don't know they are being fooled again!
Posted by: bettyn on Sep 13, 2008 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rightwing religious nut crowd continues to be fooled by the Fat Cats who run the Republican Party and this country over and over again. They play to this bunch's concerns over evolution, abortion, gay rights, and gun control every election and they vote for them every time. The REAL heart of the Republican Party could care less about this bunch. They are all about picking their pockets while controlling their votes with rightwing extremism.

The majority of the people in the country are as dumb as a box of rocks. They will vote for McCain (who now leads in most polls) simply because he picked a pistol-packing, bible thumping MaMa that their menfolk think is "hot" (as in Ellie Mae Clampett hot).

The rich will continue to get richer. The rest of us can go straight to hell!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lilly
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 13, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This may seem irrelevant, and it's not at all in the league of other discussions here, but an image keeps dominating my brain. It's a comparison of two escalators. One is in Zurich, Switzerland, going down from the main street into the (big, huge, modern) train station. That escalator is always sparkling clean, and it always works. The other escalator is in my home town of Chicago, in my local subway station. Not only is it filthy, looking as if somebody has vomited on every step and down the wall, but very seldom does it work. The Swiss elevator is in a country where people don't go crazy if they hear the suggestion that government has a proper role in maintaining an environment fit for human beings. The Chicago elevator is in a country where nothing is done unless somebody is going to turn a profit from doing it. I see Obama as being closer the Swiss-type attitude, Escalators For the People!, and McCain/Palin as being fine with the people getting vomity, half-dead escalators just as long as they and their pals are pocketing money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lilly Posted by: lisamitchel
"Privileging the Lie": PLEASE READ IT
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 13, 2008 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all read a lot of articles, but sometimes one just seems to click everything into place, like finding the last six pieces of the jigsaw puzzle. Please everybody, read Jamison Foser's article for Media Matters 9-12-08 called "Privileging the Lie". It explains the mechanics of how attitudes are subliminally shaped by the corporate-owned mainstream media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Patriotism.......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 15, 2008 2:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Repugnikans learned well from the Nazi's! I think it was Geobbels that said "of course it is always easy to get the common people to follow the will of their leaders, you get them pumped up on patriotism and make a scapegoat - of course the people will follow"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Commondreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Sep 15, 2008 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is right on target. Incredibly the right wing has recently touted the Dems' "selfishness" - all about me-ism. And yet it is they who perpetrate the most egregious selfishness being individualists, in not paying fair taxes, not admitting that we need a fair society in which everyone profits to some degree...how do they get over? Reverse aspirationism, that's how. Distrust of "elitism". Dumbing down the populace. And let's not speak of "culture" because there isn't any left - not any interesting music (certainly not any being imported from the EU which can easily be heard on regular radio)...television is dumber and dumber - game shows - the loudness, the rudeness of it all cannot be overstated. Nuance, hesitation, deep thought - all have been routed in the name of individualism.

Finally the most base individualism of all - that of voting against your party because "your candidate" didn't win - begets ruinous results. We may be disappointed but we should hew to our party if those are the principles we find important. Only in the idiocracy could you find women switching to Palin because she's a woman, period - without thought to her policies. This is the kind of selfishness the right wing wants to endure - because you can see just whom it really empowers.

But seriously people, put that i-Pod thing in your ear so you can ignore the Titanic music - after all, it's not your problem, is it!? When the world is no longer composed of those who would be thy brother's keeper in the best sense....what we have now is a fascist, selfish, greedy and amoral - not to mention anti-family state, the result of ruinous over-hyped individualism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]