Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Palin Pick Is GOP Hypocrisy at its Best

By Laura Flanders, AlterNet. Posted September 5, 2008.


Will the media test her on substance or let her play "Ms. Congeniality?" It is up to the public to see through the fact-free diet we're being fed.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In selecting Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate, John McCain is dusting off an old GOP tool: the estrogen guard. Slap a friendly, female face on a hard core-conservative political platform, and pray that the pundits will only take pot-shots and talk about gender. It worked for George W. Bush and it just may work for Palin. 

Watching Palin address the RNC from here in St. Paul, Wednesday, I could have sworn I heard Katherine Harris cheer. Remember Harris, Florida's Secretary of State in 2001, and co-chair of her state's Bush/Cheney Committee? No one did more to snag the White House for her man -- and no one was laughed and scoffed at more heartily by the media. While the press poo-poo'ed her make-up ("she seems to have applied her makeup with a trowel" wrote the Washington Post) and introduced her to the public as caricature ("Cruella de Ville"), as Florida's top election-cop, Harris purged enough voter rolls, understaffed enough voting places and ill-equipped the voting system sufficiently to guarantee election day chaos. Parodied in the press, she rose to stardom in the GOP. Come Inauguration Day 2001, Florida Republicans threw an enormous bash for the woman they dubbed "our Joan of Arc." Soon after she was elected to Congress. 

So it is with Palin. While her record stinks, so does the media coverage. In place of serious discussion of her policies on the environment, on human rights, on taxes, free speech and governance, we've had five days of "Veep Pregnant Teen Shock" and there's more than enough misogyny in the mix to give the McCain camp a stick to beat any truly investigative members of press-corps with. 

Desperate for female votes (a group the Democrats have taken for granted for years,) John McCain clearly hopes his Palin pick will burnish his appeal among middle-of-the-road women. It's a long-shot. Palin believes abortion is a crime even in the case of rape and incest (that was even too draconian for the voters of South Dakota). She supports teaching creationism in schools as strongly as, as Governor, she opposed environmental protections for the Holy planet. 

The hypocrisy is rank. Bristol, Palin's daughter "made the decision on her own to keep the baby," McCain's aides told the press. That's not a choice pregnant teens would have under the proposed administration of her mother and McCain. As for her claims to oppose corruption and pork - according to the Alaska press, she supported that costly bridge to "nowhere" for years, before finally canceling it as Governor. And experience? Again, according to Alaskan papers, during Palin's tenure as Mayor, most of the actual work of running small Wasilla was turned over to an administrator after Palin's precipitous firings gave rise to a recall campaign. Mayor Palin even tried to fire City

Librarian after she demurred at a proposal to censor the library's collection. 

Will the media see the substance or only the "Ms. Congeniality." We'll find out soon enough. But it's likely she'll get plenty of jabs in before then if her first performance on the national stage is anything to go by. Palin can dig at Obama more effectively than her running mate. (Does anyone not hear the racism in her allusion to John McCain's as the "sort of name you find on small town war memorials.") And if you're counting on her getting a grilling on the campaign trail, don't hold your breath. Reading from the Karen Hughes/Karl Rove campaign playbook, they McCain team will keep Palin from answering questions (as they did a young Texas Governor called Bush.)

They're already de-legitimating the questioners, and there will simply be no access for anyone but "Fox News" pals and those who act like them.

 So will the public that's been fed a fact-free diet of John McCain the "maverick," see through Palin, the fresh-faced feminist? Don't bet on it.

 Laura Flanders is host of GRITtv.org and author of BushWomen: Tales of a Cynical Species, (2004, Verso.)

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gop, election08, sarah palin, palin, kathleen harris

Laura Flanders is the host of GRITtv, Mon-Thursday on Free Speech TV (Dish Network chn. 9315) and streaming at GRITtv.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Do what I say Not what I do "...I am Sarah Palin and I approved this message!
Posted by: Jmari on Sep 5, 2008 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thats right double standards are back in vogue for the GOP & The Palin Pack but for the rest of us NO Pro-CHOICE, No Sex Education, No Healthcare plan, Only abstinance till marriage-No support and sorry to say if your a victim of rape no counseling and your havin that baby or you will be breaking the law.

Oh by the way now that Sarah gave birth to a disabled child you have a friend in the White House....because before that Sarah could have cared less having previously voted down funding.

Sarah Palin doesn't give to us- SHE TAKES takes AWAY from us -our rights- our freedom and all with a painted "LIPSTICK" smile on her face.

"Actions speak louder than words"

- Pay Attention Voters

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So Much For Feminism
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Sep 5, 2008 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess she dose got get any love from the Womens Groups... none, eep. Now you are going to run the Democrat Women all stars to take her too the woodshed... we shall see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Feminism is openly embraced now by REPUBLICANS... Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
Right wingnut conservatives have always been blatant hypocrites
Posted by: kiel on Sep 5, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes--the GOP is and always has been the party of hypocrites. How many times in my conservative private high school did I hear some kid "witnessing" about how Jesus kept him or her away from booze and drugs, when the weekend before I'd seen the same kid puking at a party? Now, these unrepentant hypocrites cry sexism while at the same time make such a big deal about Palin's ability to "field-dress a moose." Does that have anything to do with being a VP? Would they drone on about that if Palin were a man? Or is it just so damned cute that a "soccer mom" (oh, another sexist label they're happy to use) can do it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another NEOCON trick
Posted by: ashbaines on Sep 5, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Sarah Palin wakes up in the VP mansion - she will see a note under her pillow from Bill Kristol telling her that her "Services Are No Longer Needed"

Expect her to be dispatched to an NRA rally to boost military enlistments of goy boys for the expansion of Israel.

I can see Perle, Ledeen, Abrams, Bolton, Wolfie and the others smoking cigars and high fiving each other on how they put the "knuckle dragging contingent" to good use this time around....

same ole same ole...

Where are the Jacobins when we need to storm the Heritage Foundation and hang it's membership?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But, of course...
Posted by: Wagenvoord on Sep 5, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hypocracy is the cement that holds the Republican Party together.

Palin is a Teflon Magnolia, so we are wasting our time criticizing her. Instead,we should point out that McCain's first presidential decision was picking a running mate, and that he wasted it on what was little more than a cheap publicity stunt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's already working for McCain/Palin
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 5, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Biden has wiffle-balled his stance regarding Palin to no personal attacks, just the issues. She'll nail his ass to the wall. Obamarama has already knuckled under to the anti-surge attacks and now praises it as extraordinary..unbelievably successful etc. When will the goddam Dipocrits ever learn to FIGHT for what they covet? The polling was flat going into both conventions and any surge that has resulted is the result of media fawning over Palin. Forget "swift boat," November is about to be determined by "Palin gate" and woe be unto the free world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Exactly
Posted by: dockboy on Sep 5, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women only count if they're liberal. Otherwise, they're just tokens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Quiz Posted by: PaulD
Because Paling is a Republican, she's a "hottie". If she were a Democrat, she'd be called a slut.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 5, 2008 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the simple double standard to keep in mind. As for culture wars, for the past 40 years, since the GOP know they have nothing to highlight on accomplishments, even on the social front, igniting the culture wars is all the GOP can think of. And just look at the GOP rightwing motherfucking trolls in some of the other articles. They want you to pay no attention to the fact that America is crumbling faster than the Roman empire on both the economic and even foreign policy fronts. Instead, they want you to look at "poor lil' Sarah" as a "hot role model". Never mind that she is a neocon NAZI. Never mind her ethical and even ILLEGAL lapses. Never mind the fact that she sold out her own town and the state in the name of Big Oil and Big Religion. Never mind that she is none more than a combo of Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney with a bra.

And by the way, why are the pollsters even bothering to give either party false elevation in the polls to Mccain or even Obama despite their voting records in the Senate? If the average Joe or Jane looking for a job in almost any profession were to give such shitty speeches like those at the political conventions, they would stand no chance of being given even a second interview let alone the job. Why do we the sheeple allow the two-party duopoly to FUCK America to DEATH ?

VOTENADER.ORG !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

donnal
Posted by: donnal on Sep 5, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So when will Barry/Barack be receiving some tough questions, on his days at Columbia where Wm. Ayers was attending... did he accept help from a Saudi bussiness man for admission to Harvard?

Where is the concern for this country when we hear nothing about Barry/Barack being served yesterday, on a suit that is in the Philly courts? This suit is asking for his real COLB, the proof of citizenship, questions on his dual passports,along with is he qualified to run as a native born? You give us information on the dangers of Gov. Palin becoming VP, but do not think that this suit is information that perhaps we may and would need to know to make a choice for this man who wants to be President?

Looking into her background is fair, and it seems to be providing cover for him...but as you outed her on her family values on the net...fair play would be to out him... and I am not talking about policy when I say outing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sticks and stones Posted by: donnal
» RE: sticks and stones Posted by: rotorooter
But it was the cement...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Sep 5, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... to another stolen election in '08!

It firms up McInsane's base while Obama abandoned his.

The Democraps have NO answer again and continue to "play nice" while their campaign burns.

Biden brought NOTHING to the table for a win in Nov. If anything his selection SHOUTS "more of the same..." weakness, ineptitude in framing arguments, always on the defensive, caving in to the FORMER core values of the Democrapic party.

The Democraps come across as phonies trying to be Repukes, and people can smell this a mile away. Why vote for a Repuke-like when you can have the real thing?

If anyone though this election was going to be about REAL issues instead of the same old, same old, wedge issues, then you have been snorting the Obama platitudes to the point you better check in at Betty Ford.

The Democraps are either willing enablers of the Shrub administration or the dumbest people on the planet. They have done NOTHING to hold them accountable, so many people are starting to believe, heck, they probably did nothing wrong.

I'm voting third party this year for the first time in my life. I will not be a part of a charade...again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your senerio is as good as any... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
then what is the function of the media?
Posted by: using on Sep 5, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you implying that individual journalists are incapable of seperating Palin's comments that Obama will rasie taxes for all and hurt working families, from Obama's clear, specific spoken and written statements of who will be taxed more and who will be taxed less. Are these journalists incapable of researching or connecting recent facts of which party overspent and how the the money was spent during the Reagan and Bush years as opposed to the Clinton years? These journalist, having experienced what has happened to this country should be screaming down the Republican lies......that democrats raise our taxes on socialist program for the poor and replace it with REPUBLICANS WASTE OUR HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS ON SOCIALIST PROGRAMS FOR THE RICH. For the truth be known, the poor and middle class have to run out and spend the moeny and the rich just tuck the money away. So, the money rushing up benifits our society more then the money trickling down. Plus, there is a difference between those that are earning and producting for our the betterment of our society even amongst the rich and those that are stealing and getting well paid for it.
And since most of the newspapers and tv channels are owned by the corps I say we should complain loudly, boycott those journalists and if need be their newspapers...and support only those journalist and newspapers that stand in our corner. Money may talk to them, but only because it is beleived that they have the power to influence us. If it were beleived that they do not influence us, then their value would be lost, would it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who want to take bets on how fast Posted by: TruthBeTold
Double standards, again.....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 5, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hypocrisy surrounding this whole charade would be funny if it were a movie! But this is not a movie, this is the real world! If this is about character (not Disney's), than once again there is a lacking. This woman according to Alaska newspapers cut funding for social services at the same time she was voting for cutting sex ed. in the school system, because sex is something that should be taught by parents! Does no one see the irony - because obviously, in Bristol's case she didn't get that lecture either. Not to mention - what happened to safe sex! The nerve! These are the people that profess "family values", exactly what values are they promoting as they paraded that pregnant child onstage. Oh, I get it, now this is a "family" matter. Well, when women go to "family planning clinics" is that not a "personal family" matter? Double standard! She wanted to fire the Librarian that refused to go along with censorship, what happened to the first amendment, and what books was she trying to get rid of? Double standard!

She doesn't believe in climate change, even though her state is loosing it's permafrost! In the remote Inupiat island community of Shishmaref in the far west of Alaska, the erosion has already ended a way of life that had lasted for centuries. At its highest point the island stands at just 22ft, and confronted by thinner protective sea ice and storms that have eroded large chunks of the island, villagers voted to move their community to the mainland in 2002." That is from an Alaska Community newspaper.

So basically this woman (a)doesn't want to acknowlegde anything except guns, war, and illiteracy. This is the woman that would be a heartbeat away from being the next President of the USA! Haven't we had enough of that these last 8 years with the current Mis-Administration, please! Are we just supposed to overlook the avarice, corruption, ineptitude of "leadership" of the past and put this new group without clue into office, please! How many millions were spent to derail Bill Clinton for a dress stain, yet these criminals that should be put down for Treason, High Crimes & Misdemeanors are still in office? And John McCain that helped to enable them is being touted as some kind of hero! Double Standard!

McShame doesn't have the judgment, temperament, or vision to led this country out of the mess he and his Repugnikan compatriots have de-regulated and warred us into, ENOUGH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dear Paul
Posted by: PaulK on Sep 5, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Paul,
My boyfriend got me pregnant. Mom says that now everyone, both in church and in town, will hate me, and her too. She kept me home from school for seven months and then I had the baby. I still have a lot of the baby fat. Why does everyone hate me?
--Bristol

Dear Bristol,
I’m liberal. A friend’s daughter got pregnant twice and I don’t hate my friends or their daughter either. These things just happen, although the new grandparents really don’t like taking the economic hit. Most liberals are like this.

Dear Paul,
A teen in our church got pregnant. If we don’t castigate her, and castigate her family for allowing this to happen, pretty soon all the teens will be doing it.
--The Parisioners

Dear Parishioners,
You have no heart. I don’t like your particular church.

Dear Paul,
I’m a compassionate mom. Also I can get away with anything. In order to lift the odor of permanent castigation and of shame from my pregnant daughter, and from myself, I put on an elaborate deception. In the end I technically “stole” my daughter’s baby, but we have an in-house agreement that it’s her baby. I only lied a little, and I’m sure I got away with it. You’re a liberal, so you can forgive anything, right? Let it slide?
--Governor Sarah

Dear Governor Sarah,
I understand the compassion angle. However, if Trig is actually Bristol’s baby, then I think you may have broken a number of laws. How did you sign the birth certificate? At the times when you medically misrepresented yourself to the public, did you endanger the public welfare? Establishing a public claim to a baby that isn’t yours, even if you have a private agreement that you’ll release this claim later, may be seen by a judge as an attempt to expropriate the baby.

Breaking laws has consequences, governor. I can’t be complicit in a deception that breaks laws.

At this point the “castigation and shame” argument is null and void, because your daughter’s pregnancy is established. That leaves the castigation and shame of breaking laws. Breaking laws is between you, governor, and a judge. However, as a citizen, I report lawbreaking. Lawbreaking also reflects on your ability to be a public official.

I see a rail-thin grandma who stayed rail-thin 7 months into the claimed pregnancy, a governor who didn’t tell even her closest staff for 7 months about her pregnancy, who boasted of her gut-wrenching wind sprints, who flew 8 hours when she supposedly was leaking amniotic fluid and about to drop. This is the same grandma who claims that her daughter is 5 months pregnant so that she couldn’t have given birth 4 months ago, but that’s another one of grandma’s claims. I see Bristol disappearing from high school for the right amount of time during pregnancy and after birth.

I call them as I see them. Under a veil of “Don’t hurt Bristol” you are hurting Bristol. Maintaining a deception in the middle of great public scrutiny is placing great pressure on Bristol and the other family members, not to get caught in a huge deception. For Bristol’s health, you need to drop the deception.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I call em as I see em. Posted by: PaulK
Pavlov's Palin
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Sep 5, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Woof!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Laura Flanders event
Posted by: BBaumer on Sep 5, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an excellent article by Flanders. Check her in NYC on Sat. Sept. 13

"The 2008 Election: What's Really At Stake?"
Featuring Naomi Klein, Jeremy Scahill, Roberto Lovato, Laura Flanders and Malia Lazu.

Saturday, September 13 - 8pm
The Great Hall of The Cooper Union.
7 East 7th Street (at Third Avenue), Manhattan
Tickets Sliding Scale $6 to $15

Special Advance Reception 6:30pm:
A cozy reception where you can meet the panelists and Indypendent contributors, hors d'oeuvres and open bar — tickets start at $35.

RESERVE TICKETS NOW!
ONLINE at Brown Paper Tickets or call the TICKET HOTLINE: 1-800-838-3006
MORE INFO: www.indypendent.org, 212-221-0521 or email indybenefit@gmail.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Faith in the American People
Posted by: LiveFree on Sep 5, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I happen to believe that most people in this nation will not be flim-flammed again by the fascist Rovian tactics of the Bush crony team. We must have faith in the American people to pull out of this destructive cultural chaos and redirect society and our governments back towards achieving the American ideals of our founding fathers and mothers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin's "family affairs" showcase scandalously counterproductive Republican and Evangelical policies
Posted by: counterpoint on Sep 5, 2008 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palins teen daughters unplanned pregnancy does deserve national attention because it showcases scandalously counterproductive Republican and Evangelical policies. Both claim wanting to reduce teen pregnancies but their methods have the opposite effect. Study after study proves that abstinence-only programs are a waste of money leading to more unplanned pregnancies and more abortions. Similarly, shotgun marriages very rarely last and often end after incidences of domestic violence. Vast numbers of mothers and their children end up on their own, in poverty, undereducated, and dependent on welfare. By contrast, Democrat Barack Obama advocates scientifically proven education strategies to effectively reduce teen pregancies and abortions. America desperately needs a president committed to reason, not a right wing ideologue unconcerned about the results of his fast, instinctive decisions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which Republican Party will you vote for?
Posted by: ohb0b on Sep 5, 2008 12:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since the 2004 election, I have been convinced the best advertising for Democrats would to be just replaying the ads Republicans put on Country radio stations in urban markets. The GOP's showcasing Sarah Palin may just put my theory to work. She brings into public the side of the Republican party previously seen only on AM radio shows.
Ever since Goldwater's landslide 1964 defeat (in your guts, you know he's nuts), they have striven to keep the rad-con base under wraps during conventions, and appeal to rational people by putting on a moderate face.
But they are desperate this year. After eight years of being in charge, they can't run on the issues, so they have resorted to the tried and true Republican method of winning elections.
I'll admit, after Palin's speech the other day, for the first time I was worried. Here was a snarky, Coulteresque persona, feeding red meat to the wing-nut base. With the polls so tight, and the usual Republican voter suppression shenanigans, bringing out the nut-jobs may just push them over the top and we suffer four more years of failed Republican policies.
Then I had my faith restored by John McCain's bland, "we're Americans first, we'll reach out across party lines" centrist acceptance speech. Ah, the sweet reminisces of another candidate (whose positions McCain agrees with 90% of the time)who long ago ran as a moderate "compassionate conservative." How will they reconcile the two parties? Which Republican party will you vote for?
It is my day off, and I was listening to the car radio while running some errands. It was hilarious listening to a leader of the pro-choice Republicans trying to defend the ticket. Her logic: She expects the Democrats to retain control of Congress, and they "better damn well do their job" and block any radical Supreme Court nominations.Such a contortionist act will be hard to follow, but I'm looking forward to a lot more of them before the election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pit Bulls Banned Nationwide and Slated for Worldwide Eradication
Posted by: p.ray on Sep 5, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the care of an overly-permissive or uneducated owner, any dog with aggressive tendencies can become very dangerous. In many cases "bad owners" cause dog attacks and need to be held responsible.

Rescue from bad owners is a positive step in the right direction. However, in shelters across the United States, Pit Bulls (or dogs that appear to be Pit Bulls) comprise a large portion of the shelter's population. Due to the stigma associated with the breed (and, often, because of overcrowding) many are destroyed.

However, as a self-described "Pit Bull with lipstick," (and in stark contrast to her espoused religious fundamentalism) Sarah Palin doesn't want to be saved!

Because she lacks both proper socialization and strong training, the only solutions possible are to: neuter, contain behind stong walls, muzzle in public and keep on a short strong leash, or euthanize.

Communities within the following US states have already or propose to ban Pit Bulls and other "Bully Breeds": Michigan, Utah, Missouri, Florida, Iowa, Washington, Colorado, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Ohio, Mississippi, Illinois, and Kentucky have already banned.

I suggest we follow their lead and --

BAN SARAH PALIN

Phala

BTW: This alleged pro-lifer conservationist continues to promte the illegal aerial killing of the truly endangered "lone wolves" of her own 'heartless' land. Joe Biden needs to take a page out of her poorly written playbook and eschew "fair-chase" morality, hunt from aloft, and tear her up!

I, for one, will gladly pay a $150 bounty for her "RIGHT front leg"!

Phala

Wake UP - Be NOT Afraid - This Eight Year-long Nightmare Will Soon Be Over!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gimme a break!
Posted by: Pebbles on Sep 5, 2008 2:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Supporters of the Republican ticket have wasted no time in attacking Democrats for discussing the hypocrisy surrounding the Palin family's situation. Wasn't it the campaign who deliberately and preemptively issued the press release (since Bristol's condition will become obvious as the campaign progresses) that the governor will soon be a grandparent? As far as I can tell, all of the commentary has come from the media (to whom the press release was directed), bloggers and the public at large. Of course, they expected that Hurricane Gustav would overwhelm the day's news. Ha!

The McC-P gang has no right to protest. If they didn't want it to be an issue, Someone might have politely declined a spot on the ticket. You don't have to be a PR genius to see that this story is red meat for a broad range of interest groups. It would never have been an issue beyond (or possibly even within) the 49th state if the campaign hadn't made it news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gimme a break! Posted by: dangerouslysane
Election farce
Posted by: willymack on Sep 5, 2008 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rethugs could run Charles Manson and Karl Rove for president and veepee and "win" because they will, in all probability, control the vote count as they did in 2000 & 2004. You don't even want to know about Plan B.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Plan B Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Plan B Posted by: cdub
On the happier side-a comment from a chronic republican
Posted by: Drclaw on Sep 5, 2008 3:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..my father. Hasn't voted for a Dem since the Korean war. Was undecided-sort of the classic independent. He's so aghast at the Palin choice that he'll be voting Obama in '08. I suspect this will happen alot. Not that I expect much from the Repubs-but this was a screwy choice. Lieberman probably would have sealed the deal in FL for McCain-you think that'll happen now? How about PA or VA-other states where McCain had at least an outside chance before. Much much slimmer now. Although it's dangerous to make predictions, it appears as if the religious right has cause the Repubs to overplay their hand. Loosing in Nov might well cause a Titanic break-up of the unholy coalition that has given us the excreable Reagan, and Bush I and II presidencies. We can only hope..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin's Judgement in Question
Posted by: sabrina on Sep 5, 2008 7:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I first heard that Ms. Palin had a down's syndrome baby that she choose to not abort, my first reaction was that was a couragious choice, but at least she had a choice. Now that a few days have passed and I have had a chance to think clearly, I now question her judgement, not to keep the child, but to get pregnent in the first place. She was 44 years old. The risk of giving birth to a baby with a birth defect is great. She already had 4 children, a mix of boys and girls, so they weren't trying one more time for a son or daughter, they already had both. They world's resources are being strechted to the limit, some thought should be given to limiting ourselves to 2 children per couple. I don't want that kind of poor judgement in charge of our country. I don't favor aborting special needs children, because they add to the diverse rainbow that enrich our lives, but why get pregnent in the first place, given the facts of the situation. What astoundingly poor judgement and bad example for Bristol.

Richard

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Alaskan/U.S. cultural divide Posted by: sheena2u
"Pro-Life" Governor Sarah promotes aerial killing of wolves
Posted by: onevoter on Sep 5, 2008 7:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Governor Sarah Palin, Ms. "Pro-Life, supports and encourages the aerial killing of wolves.
Cowardly, hypocritical bitch!

Which animal would Jesus shoot from a plane?

Have you ever heard of aerial hunting? It's a brutal practice. Wolves are shot from low-flying aircraft or chased to exhaustion, then killed at point-blank range.

Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican nominee for Vice President, promotes this barbaric practice, exploiting a loophole in the Federal Airborne Hunting Act to allow private wolf killers to shoot down wolves using aircraft. We have to get the word out about this!

Please watch this powerful video by Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund, and then share it with every wildlife lover you know:

http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinvideo

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More GOP Hypocrisy?
Posted by: Cannoliamo on Sep 6, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just one question .... (well, maybe two)

Are the GOPers who are protecting Palin from the press the same right-wing conservatives who demanded press coverage of Whitewatergate and Paula Jones? Isn't this more a case of "use the press against your foes and protect your allies from negative press." Isn't this the same basis for the government propaganda campaigns that are rampant in so many illegitimate governments?

... just wondering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin is moot
Posted by: Red Green on Sep 6, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Palin character is physically and politically,identical to Peggy,"king of the",Hill.Like the cartoon ,she has no substance.Just like both american parties. But the republicans shall fail,therefore ,Palin is moot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

endangered species
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com on Sep 6, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
along with putting a 150$ bounty on wolves and allowing them to be hunted from an airplane, Palin has sued the congress for making polar bears an endangered species. this is one heartless bitch. can you imagine what her kids undergo at home? i'm sure everything goes her way in that family. meanwhile, daddy is busy racing snowmobiles and kissing her right wingnut ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin, Jerry Falwell, Pat O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, the RIGHT WING nutjobs
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 7, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin is about as sincere and concerned about your well being and salvation as Jerry Falwell in his crusade to protect Americans from the evil Tele-tubbies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Double standard/hypocrisy
Posted by: sheena2u on Sep 8, 2008 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The very idea that the Republican camp is repeatedly insisting on "deference" from the press, or anyone, for Palin stinks to high Heaven.

The treatment of Hillary Clinton by the Repubican extremists was base and sexist. Sarah Palin, herself, had the unmitigated gall to say Hillary was whining and basically needed to man up and "prove herself." These are not the words of a woman who deserves to be treated with kid gloves, or with deference.

The Republicans want it both ways. They want to persecute Hillary freely, and then they expect to bring forth an insultingly unqualified female candidate and say "Back off folks, be nice, play soft ball, don't even think of being mean to our little flower or we will screech 'sexism!'." Meanwhile they keep her sequestered away where they can cram her brain with as many short statements as possible so that she can parrot whatever they want her to say or do.

Less than two years ago she was not yet Governor of Alaska, and this is her primary claim to fame until now. Alaska is very much unlike the rest of the country, or America at large, and her experience as governor qualifies her in no way to the White House except in the ficticious imaginations of Republican spin doctors and zealots. Alaska is the largest state, and the second smallest in population. The problems of Alaska are entirely unlike those of the rest of the country. To say that she has international experience because Alaska borders Russia and Canada is a desperate stretch and an insult to everyone's intelligence.

Nor do her years as Mayor of Wasilla, then a town of less than 6,000 people qualify her to be Vice President. As Mayor she took a tiny town with no debt and saddled it with a debt of over two million, and she promoted unbridled development that was entirely out of character with the prior friendly charm and historic uniqueness of the area. It is now a charmless, polluted, and unattractive hodgepodge of box stores and gravel pits.

The choice of an unqualified woman who will be a parrot and a puppet to Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, and the Republican smear machine is an insult to the office of Vice President, and to intelligent women and men. Her selection was cynical, and an example of the very worst corruption and dishonesty in politics.

If this is an example of "change," then we must redefine the word to mean "the same old cynical machinations that represent the worst possible side of politics."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP McCain/Palin running on a flatform of hypocrisy, double standard and blatant lies.
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 9, 2008 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain/Sarah Palin 08', running on a flatform of hypocrisy, double-standard and blatant lies.

Just like 8 years of the failed policies of Bush/Cheney/Rove administration.

Same old, same old.

Guaranteeing the continued de-leveraging and financial meltdown of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]