Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Sarah Palin's Trouble with the Police

By Robert Parry, Consortium News. Posted September 2, 2008.


In her two executive jobs in Alaska, Palin ousted top law-enforcement officials because they were insufficiently loyal or not malleable enough.
Advertisement

You have to admire the Republican chutzpah. Still confronting a national scandal about packing the Justice Department with “loyal Bushies,” they pick a vice presidential candidate who – in her two executive jobs in Alaska – ousted top law-enforcement officials because they were insufficiently loyal or not malleable enough.

One of those firings has put Gov. Sarah Palin at the center of an ongoing legislative investigation that presumably will require her to testify about whether she was behind efforts by her husband and senior staff to pressure the state’s public safety commissioner to fire her ex-brother-in-law from the state troopers.

When the commissioner, former Anchorage police chief Walter Monegan, refused to go along, he was summarily ousted by Palin without much explanation.

Unless the Republicans can figure out a way to block Palin’s sworn deposition, she will have to either admit that she used her political influence to wage a family vendetta or she must face the risk that her continued denials of involvement will be contradicted by her own staff or by some other evidence.

However, if Palin admits that she did use her government office to punish a personal enemy – or that she fired the public safety commissioner because he refused to join in her family feud – the Republicans may have trouble continuing to sell Palin as a reform-minded governor.

Instead, Palin would appear to fit more neatly with Bush administration operatives who engineered the firing of nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 and who employed ideological litmus tests in deciding who to hire for career jobs at the Justice Department.

As Kyle Sampson, chief of staff to then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, famously put it: the motive for purging the federal prosecutors was to eliminate those who were deemed not “loyal Bushies.”

Some of the U.S. Attorneys, such as New Mexico’s David Iglesias, had balked at political pressure before Election 2006 to bring what the prosecutors considered flimsy voter-fraud cases against prominent Democrats.

Now it appears that Sarah Palin shares the Bush administration's view about putting cronies in key law-enforcement jobs, making hers act like “loyal Palinistas.” As mayor of the tiny town of Wasilla and as governor of Alaska, she fired two top law-enforcement officials when they didn’t show sufficient loyalty or obedience to her.

Ousting the Chief

In 1996, after winning the election to be mayor of Wasilla then with a population of about 5,000, Palin sought to oust six department heads because they had signed a letter supporting the previous mayor, their old boss. Palin ultimately fired two of them, including the police chief.

Wasilla’s ousted police chief, Irl Stambaugh, sued Palin in 1997 for alleged contract violation, wrongful termination and gender discrimination The police chief claimed Palin fired him not for cause but for being disloyal and because he was a man whose size – 6 feet and 200 pounds – intimidated her.

However, a federal judge dismissed Stambaugh’s lawsuit.

So, having escaped any serious damage for punishing Wasilla’s police chief for a supposed lack of political loyalty, Palin had little reason not to throw her weight around when she became Alaska’s governor in December 2006.

By then, Palin was deeply involved in her family’s vendetta against her sister’s ex-husband, trooper Mike Wooten. Through complaints to his superiors, Palin already had helped engineer Wooten’s five-day suspension from the state police earlier in 2006 for various examples of personal misconduct.

In January 2007, a month into Palin’s term, her husband, Todd, invited Palin’s new public safety commissioner Monegan to the governor’s office, where Todd Palin urged Monegan to reopen the Wooten case. After checking on it, Monegan informed Todd Palin that he couldn’t do anything because the case was closed.

In an interview with the Washington Post, Monegan said that a few days later, the governor also called him about the Wooten matter and he gave her the same answer. Monegan said Gov. Palin brought the issue up again in a February 2007 meeting at the state capitol, prompting his warning that she should back off.

However, Monegan said Gov. Palin kept bringing the issue up indirectly through e-mails, such as comparing another bad trooper to “my former brother-in-law, or that trooper I used to be related to.”


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sarah palin, troopergate

Robert Parry's new book is Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It does not really matter ....
Posted by: Ryan on Sep 2, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where Pallin stands. She is being supported by the Republican party, both now and in the past in her bid for govener. This automatically implies that she is of the same mold as the other republican leaders. The Republican party has a (relatively short) history to only suppport those people who are of the same mind as those who are now in the White House, i.e., old politics ... even when she has played a role in some reforms in Alaska. This should be kept in mind when we deal with her. Also, she is not running for president. We should remain focussed that the race is between McCain and Obama, not between Pallin and Obama!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yet another Republican...
Posted by: CanuckKid on Sep 2, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...crooked enough to sleep in a corkscrew, and nutty enough to embarrass a fruitcake.

Not that they're all like this, but there seems to be a trend happening here...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The POW and the WOW express
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Sep 2, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin was the perfect pick for McSame to show his 'decider' abilities. We are all so lucky to have been given this opportunity to vote for an ex-point guard, ex-beauty queen. I feel so much more reassured about her knowledge of foreign affairs, thanks to Cindy McSame's educated analysis that Palin lives in a state next to Russia, so by association she is qualified. Let's review:

She loves guns
She loves oil
Guns and oil = wars
She loves cronyism
She loves abuse of power
She loves religious manipulation

She hates women's reproductive rights
She promotes abstinence (in all but her family)
She hates the environment

What an insult to Hillary supporters!
What a laughing stock we have become to the world.

The only person she might appeal to is Rush Lindbaugh, who flunked out of college and is nutters! Or, oh yeah, the msm so-called journalists- LOL!
As for McSame, he puts me to sleep - and couldn't he change up his "My friends" to Mes Amis or Mis Amigos or something? Everytime I see his face and hear his voice on tv, I have to immediately change the channel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FRIGHTENING SIMILARITIES
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 2, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does Sarah Pain remind me of Dick Cheney? Aside from being much better looking. She's Dick all over again. Jut plain mean! Her entire past is like a sick twisted soap opera. She leaves a trail of people who wish they'd never met her. She's nutty as a fruitcake and downright dangerous. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More of the same...
Posted by: g on Sep 2, 2008 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another reality-impervious Republican who thinks that if she does not like something all she has to do is ignore it and it will just go away. They still don't get it: reality has a way to come and bite you in the a... (teenage pregnancies anyone?). Anyone who is a global-warming denier and a supporter of abstinence-only sex ed or of teaching creationism in schools proves herself science-illiterate enough to be disqualified for public office. Or at least should be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Executive What?
Posted by: nativechef66 on Sep 2, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone else catch this little tidbit?

The writing is on the wall here. Should, and I repeat should, Bushco mandate executive privilege, either through proxy or directly, this will end any and all hopes for the Republicans and make direct ties to the current administration that McCain is trying to, and failing, distance himself from. The Republicans are in damage control mode at present by not thoroughly vetting this choice to begin with. I'd expect to see even more distractions from the them while they try and cover this "oops".

All in all not a very well thought out plan. We can see how well the RNC is going at the moment. Seems the St. Paul PD has their hands full with inventing charges for protesters while they play the tag and release game. Good hunting boys!!!! Maybe they should let Sara show them how it's done from the confines of an aircraft.

Thanks for the shot..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin on Malloy
Posted by: pauldd on Sep 2, 2008 7:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure it wasn't a spoof but she was just on the Mike Malloy show and he asked her about the abuse of power charge. She responded that it was all true and it was a point of pride for her as it proved she was "determined" and a woman who knows how to "get things done". She said something to the effect of not letting the "rules" get in her way. Anyone else hear it?

I was flabbergasted. Maybe it was a spoof? If not, someone should get the transcript or audio clip of her response. If it gets play, it is the single event that will DESTROY her and McCain's chances of taking over our country. An open admission of abuse of power as an elected representative. Holy shit, this woman CANNOT become VP (let alone McCain becoming president)!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Explaining this to a young girl
Posted by: TheGoodBus on Sep 3, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I was talking to this little girl Catherine, the daughter of some friends, and she said she wanted to be President some day.
Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there with us and I asked Catherine, "If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?"
Catherine replied - "I would give houses to all the homeless people."
"Wow! What a worthy goal you have there, Catherine." I told her, "You don't have to wait until you're President to do that, you can come over to my house and clean up all the dog “stuff” in my back yard and I will pay you $5 dollars. Then we can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $5 dollars to use for a new house."
Catherine (who was about 4) thought that over for a second, while her mom looked at me seething, and Catherine replied, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and clean up the dog “stuff” and you can just pay him the $5 dollars?"
I said, "Welcome to the Republican Party."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]