Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Palin: The Stakes Just Got Higher

By Nomi Prins, AlterNet. Posted August 29, 2008.


McCain may be resorting to obvious pandering with his VP pick -- but political pandering wins elections.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Maybe Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin wouldn't have been McCain's first choice for vice president if there weren't lingering hard feelings about Hillary's campaign or lack of consideration for the VP slot. But, it doesn't matter. There were, and she is.

The Democrats are in a tough position after Obama's electrifying speech. There is no glory-basking time. They can't attack Palin's experience level since she has more technical executive experience as the number two woman (yes woman) on the GOP ticket, than Obama does. And if they complain too loudly about her being selected just because she's a woman, they will alienate millions of female voters in swing states who are still annoyed about Hillary's smacking her head on the glass ceiling after cracking it 18 million times.

Palin, after paying homage to Hillary's feat, deftly said now they can crack that ceiling once and for all. The ticket puts a whole new gender spin on the election. To millions of Americans, particularly women, who don't spend every minute of their days watching and analyzing political news -- because they are working for a hard-to-achieve living -- the GOP just stole their own piece of history, rendering Obama's safe pick of Biden, not so safe after all.

Obama took a risk in not choosing a woman who captured 18 million votes as his VP, and not explaining why. McCain seized upon that omission by choosing the relatively unknown Palin as a result. Obama must now walk a fine line. He can criticize what Palin has done or believes. But he must recognize her for the historic choice (to take a page out of the GOP's playbook) that she is (and that he avoided). That could be the only way to capture the millions of female voters across the country, many of which voted for Hillary and haven't yet decided on Obama.

McCain will praise Palin's qualities as much as he will praise Hillary's accomplishments. He and she will extol women's suffrage with extreme political zeal. It may be melodramatic, it may be obvious pandering -- but political pandering wins elections. And, as the U.S. Open steams on, the political ball is back in Obama's court for a very important response.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: women, mccain, election 08, sarah palin

Nomi Prins is a senior fellow at the public policy center Demos and author of Other People's Money and Jacked: How "Conservatives" are Picking your Pocket (Whether you voted for them or not).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Can we relate
Posted by: LionHeart on Aug 29, 2008 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"He and she will extol women's suffrage with extreme political zeal. It may be melodramatic, it may be obvious pandering -- but political pandering wins elections."' - may I remind the author that this is EXACTLY what Obama did regarding MLK historic speech coinciding with his nomination.

The unqiue thing about this election is you have those informed as to what each candidate stands for and will vote accordingly, then you have those voting for Obama because he's black regardless of many of his positions or lack of experience. Now you have those that may be drawn into McCains camp because Palin is a women regardless of her experience.

Can this be, people are voting for a person, and not their supposed fake politics? It seems that is has come down to who can relate to who!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's gonna suck to be you on Nov. 5 Posted by: hurricane hugo
The 21st Century's Dan Quayle
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Aug 29, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From a Democratic Party view, the choice of Sarah Palin couldn't be better. She can be turned into the Dan Quayle of the 21st century, a standing joke handed to The Daily Show.

Mccain's thinking is obvious: Find a woman, any woman, who hasn't been scandal tarnished and select her as VP. Then wait for disaffected Hillar supporters, the PUMA's, to vote for McCain.

(By the way, we are discovering PUMA was actually started by a shadowy organization with ties to the GOP and Karl Rove. Right away, I thought it seemed to have Rove's greasy monkey paws all over it.)

There's only one problem: With Palin, so-called PUMA's are being offered a staunchly anti-abortion, rabid pro-gun candidate who has brushed against her own share of Alaskan scandals. Can McCain's "brain trust" - I know, I know: That's an oxymoron - really believe that women voters will switch from the most pro-choice, anti-gun candidate on the stump this year to someone who holds the exact opposite views?

Now I know that McCain's campaign is truly run short-sighted idiots and greedy, effete snobs. The fact is, Sarah Palin is the 21st century's Dan Quyale.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politcal Hardball
Posted by: Southern Gal on Aug 29, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought that Obama/Clinton would be an unbeatable ticket. Biden has many of the same negatives as Clinton and he didn't win 18 million voters. Obama will need Hillary to campaign heavily for him if he wants to win this election. The Republicans certainly noticed that women are a key factor in this election and acted on that fact with the VP selection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, please
Posted by: Noticed on Aug 29, 2008 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This choice is offensive to women in that it assumes that we aren't smart enough to vote based on issues. She might be a woman, but she is no friend to women's issues. The vast majority of Clinton supporters can recognize that when it comes to what matters to them (health care, equal pay, reproductive rights) the McCain ticket is dangerous regardless of who he has as #2.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, please Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Oh, please Posted by: topbrick
Complete insult to Hillary and her supporters
Posted by: DrFitz on Aug 29, 2008 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin may work for the winger base--we'll see--but this is a slap in the face to Hillary and her supporters. Whereas choosing a qualified female like Kay Bailey Hutchinson might have caused the problem you note, Palin does not. This clearly political choice TOTALLY undercuts the country first slogan. If Obama hadn't already put the nail in the coffin with his speech, this VP choice definitely did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» checkmate Posted by: edgar1
Experience????? LOL
Posted by: BlueSun on Aug 29, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin is an ex beauty-queen (she didn't even win), and a former local sports reporter. She is three years younger than Barack Obama. Her entire political resume consists of:

* 2 terms on the Wasilla, Alaska City Council in the 1980s, when the population was something between 4,000 and 5,000 people,

* a term as part-time mayor of Wasilla.

* She has now been the Governor of Alaska for something like 20 months, and rode to the Republican nomination on the back of the scandals that destroyed the re-election chances of the incumbent, Frank Murkowski. She was elected Governor with less than 50% of the vote.

She has NO foreign policy experience.

She has NO national domestic policy experience.

She has NO stance on Free Trade.

She has NO national economic policy experience.

She has shown no experience in education or health care.

When asked a month ago on CNBC whether she was interested in becoming Vice President, she said she couldn't answer that until somebody explained to her what a Vice President does!

Her political resume makes Obama look like a grizzled old pol.

On the other hand, she is a Christian fundamentalist, an ardent believer in creationism, and proponent of introducing creationism into the science curriculum in public schools.

She used to lead Christian Fellowship prayers before sporting events in her high school.

She is passionately anti-abortion, a heroine to the National Right To Life Committee, far more so than John McCain, whose Right-to-Life credentials are questioned by some on the Right.

She is fervently pro-gun, a lifetime NRA member and used to love hunting moose with her father (and eating mooseburgers). During her gubernatorial campaign, some of her supporters have called her the most pro-gun candidate in the country.

She favors legalizing capital punishment in Alaska.

She supports drilling in ANWR far more passionately than John McCain, who has flip-flopped a couple of times on it.

She steadfastly opposes Gay Marriage, though she did veto a bill that would have restricted benefits to gay couples (on the advice of her Attorney General, who said it was an unconstitutional bill anyway).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xperience????? LOL Posted by: debmcd
» image, not issues matter Posted by: edgar1
» RE: image, not issues matter Posted by: topbrick
Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Aug 29, 2008 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By experience do you mean being Governor for two years of a state with a low population or a mayor of a town with 9,000 citizens who 99% of this country has never heard of? Or maybe the experience of running the state with the most Congressional members under investigation or indictment.(do the words "highway to nowhere" mean anything to you) Now she's the Vice Presidential pick who, on video admits she doesn't even know what the Vice President does. All this adds up to a very interesting Vice Presidential Debate. I can't believe that McCain believes that just because Hillary didn't win, all the women will now vote for him just because he picked a woman. Women didn't vote for Hillary just because she was a woman. They believed in her as a person who they thought could lead our nation. It's rather disgusting that McCain's thinking is so rich white male and shallow. This is what he thinks of Hillary's supporters. That they would accept a very poor substitute who doesn't even have the same values as Hillary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

holman
Posted by: ps2987 on Aug 29, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that Ms. Palin's child with Down's Syndrome could be a very tricky situation. I would think that running for VP and being VP is a pretty time consuming proposition. Is she deserting her 4 month old baby who has special needs to further her political career? Is her husband going to be a stay at home Dad? Are they wealthy enough to have nannies take care of the children? Is this a good thing? Don't know how this will all play out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Question Answered Posted by: edgar1
remember Harriet Myers
Posted by: Zenobia on Aug 29, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One part of me says:
Don't panic yet. Remember how the White Male Christian Brigade pounced on the Harriet Myers nomination like a pack of rabid dogs. The Evangelicals might be impressed with her anti-choice mumbo jumbo, but really--in their world view, she would not be a "real woman" if she left those 5 kids at home, and her guy certainly wouldn't be a "real man" if he stepped in as Mr. Mom. Their own rule book is going to come and bite them in the butts.

McCain might pick up a few "soccer moms" who are just too damn busy to keep up with the policy wonks, but she is just too easy to crush on actual issues. And those busy "soccer moms" just don't have the time to organize that the fundamentalists do.

Another part of me says:
The Fundies LOOOOOOVE to tote and parade those anti-choice women to say, see, look, we're not anti-woman! We worship our lovely brood mares! Any time I've been to a pro-choice counter rally, the anti-choice set has all the doe eyed teen girls leading the pack.

So, Mr. Obama, ball is in your court! Are you going to still keep spewing your "I personally think abortion is wrong" garbage, or are you going to stand up and FIGHT to get the message out that your record on choice is 50x better than McCain's?

Sorry, but Obama shot himself in the foot by pandering so hard to the Christian Right, and by picking a running mate with a 36/100 rating from NARAL. He blurred the lines for the people trying to figure out who is who on what.

He is now going to have to either lie in the bed he fluffed, or flip the mattress. Otherwise, we might all be having 5 kids like McCain's running mate.

The Dems never seem to learn on the pandering bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bob
Posted by: biscuitbob on Aug 29, 2008 8:25 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is smarter than you all think, had he picked Hillary she'd have been President withinn two years and he would have been pushing up daisies. Just my take on it...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin will self -destruct.
Posted by: topbrick on Aug 30, 2008 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what a pity that the Repugs bring us back down to the lowest common denominator after the inspiring speeches of Obama and, even more so, Gore. What a relief to hear speeches by people of intelligence. and what a disappointment to see the news today. McCain is clueless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just perfect
Posted by: overseas on Aug 30, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am diehard Obama supporter....but this gimmick by McCain is worrying. It plays to the disgruntled masses...as dems have always forgot about these recent decades. People vote with their hearts...econmics and energy is mumbo jumbo....move me and I will vote for you is the case for most people and GOP know it...but will dems figure it out? YIKES? Obama's team better get ready and make a plan that works or it is 4 more scary years and they may get scarier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ST3742
Posted by: rightous on Aug 30, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After reading Nomi Prins book, OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY, I thought she was thoughtful, insightful and thorough. However, after reading this article, I am wondering where Nomi's mind is!

I could not disagree with her more about the reasoning or the conclusions she fallously comes to in her article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin's Real Value
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Aug 31, 2008 3:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin probably won't convince many erstwhile Hillary Clinton voters to support the GOP ticket, but she will energize the GOP base. The Christian Right's support for McCain is tepid at best, and having a board-certified Bible thumper on the ticket will bring out the folks who made it possible for Bush and Cheney to get into the White House where, with evangelicals' gleeful and unstinting support, they have failed in every sphere of governance, turned the executive branch into a criminal syndicate, devastated our economy, trashed our Constitution, inflicted severe environmental damage, multiplied our enemies and alienated our friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take the easy way out
Posted by: loxias on Aug 31, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boldy call out McCain's sleeping around on first wife, leaving her for prettier wealthy woman. Ask him to explain why we shouldn't expect him to play with his VP in the oval office? Is he willing to admit he's too old to care?
Ask if he will call his VP a cunt if she speaks out of turn.
Ask his VP if she would have appreciated the government NOT giving her the choice to HAVE a Down's afflicted child, only to go to work and let her kids deal with it.
If the majority voted for criminalizing 'not aborting sick children', would she have aborted? Does her belief in the choice to NOT have an abortion take precedence over her belief in the law? Isn't that pro-choice?
Make this a nasty fight or give up. People want dirt. They want entertainment.
You've watched the last 2 nom's lose because they were unwilling to fight or to employee unscrupulous methods.
In retrospect, was the false sense of integrity worth it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]