Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Dems Nominate Obama, Unify and Transform the Party

By John Nichols, TheNation.com. Posted August 28, 2008.


A hundred years ago, Dems questioned whether to take a stand against lynching. Today, Obama's nomination completes a long process of transformation.
Advertisement

DENVER -- In 1908, when Democrats first gathered in Denver, African-American activists asked the party to make a place for them -- inside the convention, in the platform and in the campaign to come. At the very least, they asked, Democrats should take a stand against lynching.

William Jennings Bryan, the Democratic nominee for president , vetoed even that modest outreach -- fearing that to do so would weaken the party's hold on what was then referred to as "the solid south."

One hundred years passed. A civil rights movement rose. A new generation of political leaders -- most, though not all of them, Democrats -- stepped gingerly toward the future.

And on Wednesday afternoon, at around 4:50 p.m., the Democratic party nominated an African-American man for president.

There has been a lot of talk, too much talk, about this being a "transformational moment" in American politics.

But it must be said that, if the quadrennial convention is the measure of a political party, then the Democrats have, a century on from their first gathering in Denver, completed a process of transformation.

Despite the bizarrely determined efforts of convention organizers and the campaign of Barack Obama to shift the focus away from nominating speeches and a clumsy roll-call vote -- by restructuring the schedule to complete the process while many Americans were still at work -- the most historic moment of the convention was its most traditional.

Far from the prying eyes of prime-time television, Democrats undertook the rituals of nominating two candidates for president -- Hillary Clinton, the woman who began the campaign as the all-but-certain Democratic nominee, and Obama, the man who upset those best-laid plans.

Such was the desire of the managers of the convention to downplay the actual work of the delegates who have traveled from across the country to be a part of this moment that those chosen to place the names of Clinton and Obama in nomination delivered almost perfunctory remarks.

Michael Wilson, a registered Republican from Florida and an Air Force medic who served in Iraq, nominated Barack Obama with an on-message declaration that, "I've seen war up close. I support Barack Obama because America needs a president who has the strength, wisdom and courage to talk to our enemies... who will respect our veterans when they get back home instead of letting them languish without the medical care they deserve."

Colorado Senator Ken Salazar dressed on-message, wearing a cowboy hat as he seconded the Obama's nomination. Another second came from Alabama Congressman Artur Davis, D-Ala., who assured the delegates that, "Our time is now!"

The Clinton nominating speeches were better, especially that of veteran United Farm Workers union leader Dolores Huerta, who described herself as a "passionate" Clinton backer and told the convention: "Hillary's values are the values of my family and my community. For Hillary Clinton, no American is invisible."

Whether the speeches were muscular or lame, however, the mood was electric in a convention hall that filled rapidly as delegates rushed to be part of the first real convention roll-call vote since Democrats nominated Bill Clinton in 1992.

States, commonwealths and territories grabbed their moments in the limelight -- Alabama stayed united behind Clinton, and everyone cheered; Illinois was strong for Obama, and everyone cheered; Guam asked for more self-determination, and everyone cheered.

It quickly became evident that Clinton delegates were breaking for Obama in a big way. Clinton had announced earlier in the day that she was casting her super-delegate vote for her former rival, and there was a "If he's good enough for Hillary..." vibe as the states announced. Michigan, where Obama wasn't even on the primary ballot, voted 125-27 for the Illinois senator.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, civil rights, barack obama, dnc, joe biden, martin luther king jr

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I thought it was me who had been banned last week but I was wrong. It was Hugh Scott
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 28, 2008 3:11 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made a mistake. I accidentally clicked on [Ignore this user] re myself. I effectively banned myself.

Its quite a useful feture because it makes spammers go away.

Goodbye Hugh Scott. I have managed to avoid your website.

Maybe the moderator can delete your post and my reply to it.

You are like an advert every 5 minutes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hahahahahahahahahahahahaha... Posted by: hurricane hugo
RE: URAH for Hillary and Bill Clinton
Posted by: 6399 on Aug 28, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alterneters are amazing. Because you're a soldier you get 1s and for no other reason. It really is shameful.

You obviously have nothing of value to say. Now crawl back into your bunker and kill some more babies. That should make 'em happy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Outraged By Hughscott's Ban!!! Re Instate Him!!!
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 28, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is uncalled for!
This is a public forum, One great thing about American is Our Right to make an ass out of ourselves in Public AND the public to respond. Perhaps we are not as eloquent, or diplomatic as 'Professional'bloggers, but no one said we had to be!
HughScott has been the victim of unwarranted personal attacks for sometime- I have read them and be outraged. However, the opportunity to hear his detractor, opens further opportunities to combat such ideologies.
I hate BillO,Rush & Hannity..However it is far better to expose them to the light of a public forum, then to allow them to remain subversive. How can we change the way the world works, if we are barred from hearing all voices?
I feel for Hughscott, I too have been banned..From that so called 'Liberal' Rag HuffPo...Why because I voiced the idea those Corp big wigs be held personally responsible for the Debt to foreign Gov'ts, they have run up on OUR bill!Guess voicing that thought did not go over well on the business page.Wow what a 'Radical' idea holding people personally responsible for their actions.
Alternet had better get a grip on what 'Free Speech' entails.did hughscott Threaten Him, or suggest any form of violence? No he called him a name...Sticks & Stones.
Funny the commenter who asked if I had 'purple lips' was not banned...Was that a play on my name, a sexist commment or a racist comment?
Frankly I took it in stride- it said more about them than it did about me.
Holland get a thicker skin or get out of the OPEN Forum!
Honestly, Ithink there is far more to this story then a mere name calling incident.God Knows the Spying Admin hates any ex military who speaks out against them or their next puppet!Makes you wonder if this 'liberal' blog site is what it claims, or a Dragnet to silence dissent, and Truth.
Re Instate HughScott, and apologize for this violation of Free speech!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go Hugh!!!
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Aug 28, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Hugh, did it ever occur to you that maybe you keep getting banned for using this forum to spam your hack-job website and not for calling Joshua Holland an asshole? Hell I've called him a churlish whoreson foot-licker and never got banned for that.

Anyway I'm sorry you got banned but don't you think it is rather undignified to make up fake people to use to spam your website? If you are going to make a new account every day just keep being Hugh Scott and don't try and pretend to be "Scotty's" ex-marine airline buddy, his Korean War veteran dentist, his distant cousin twice removed on his mother's side who lost a leg in Iraq I and became horribly scarred when saving some Muslim babies from the flames of WTC 7 as a firefighter in NYC on 9/11, or any other pretend military veteran acquantaince of yours.

You are being a bit passive-aggressive about saying "fuck you" to Alternet, don't ya think? If you want to piss in Alternet's coffee by doing this whack-a-mole thing every time you get banned I'm all for it but you should grow some balls about the whole thing and stop making fake people up to hide behind. Its kind of pathetic dude.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Go Hugh!!! Posted by: sirios
» RE: Go Hugh!!! Posted by: LionHeart
only if.......
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 28, 2008 2:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The entirety of the progression from the dark ages of hatred, bigotry and racism to liberation will be realized only if Obama wins. Seeing the negativity and corporate response to his nomination irrefutably shows that such victory is running second to well-established and more comfortable denial. Will America's sordid history be revoked in November? I am hopeful but damned sure doubtful!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Election of Barack Obama as President of The USA Is Very Important To The World
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 28, 2008 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The World doesn't understand US Politics except in very simple terms.

The election of a Black Man will send a very powerful sign to the rest of the World that America has changed and wants Peace.

It will be perceived as the start of bringing back America into the World community.

In reality things can only change for the better slowly.

Obama will be saying all the things he is advised to say in order to achieve the desired result of victory.

Deep analysis may give the impression that in real terms the policies being promoted by the Democrats vary only in minor details from the Republicans. However politicans have to give the message that they think will connect with the electorate.

Once elected, the situation can gradually change.

You can only go with the situation you have got. Changing people's beliefs takes time.

People are afraid, and it will take time to ease their fears and make them feel confident again.

Obama has the potential to make these changes come about.

His wife talks a lot of sense and will keep him on the right track.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America's Common Mistake
Posted by: desidid on Aug 28, 2008 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is to continuely mark each point of progress as the end of racism. The remarkable thing about that premise is that both the Clinton campaign and the McCain campaign did/are mining the seeds of racism to further their political ambitions. If Americans are ever going to end racism they have to be honest about its application. I applaud the Clintons for great speeches, but like an elephant I'll remember what they did and how McCain is using it against Obama. I will still blame them if Obama loses and I think a number of other Blacks will as well. We now have 30% of poll respondents stating they won't vote for a Black person. I think the Clintons and McCain have made racist feel comfortable enough to now tell the truth about how they vote. We turned a corner, but we haven't reached our destination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America's Common Mistake Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: America's Common Mistake Posted by: tennismom
Dems Nominate Obama, Unify and Transform the Party...
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Aug 28, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... And lose horribly in November
McCain has closed the gap
Joe Biden is:
Big Bank (look at your Credit Card bill and see it came from the state of DE)
Pro War: you hear that speech last night... were are we going to get this "bigger military" or become "lean and mean" oh wait that was Rumsfiled plan and that did not work. Russia is crossing there fingers hoping this dude Obama gets elected. Obama is going to make Russia RICH thanks to the Democrats Pollyanna stance on energy (MT Gov sounded like a Republican). I can ramble on how Biden and Obama totally contradict each other (bankruptcy bill anyone)
The Democrats with there willing accomplices in the Media will forget to tell you these things however if you willing to look the other way well you AlterNeters are good with pointing out the hypocrisy that this campaign has become.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obamas speech Posted by: LionHeart
This is the Face of Change
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 28, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS IS SPREADING LIKE A WILDFIRE OF HOPE. JOIN US! Reply with I JOIN! onsubject line. Thanks & welcome!~ ~

JOIN the CALL for a BROOMSTICK REVOLUTION~ A SINGLE AFTERNOON There shall soon be a day whenWe, the People of America,will stand up together as Oneon a Single Afternoon--yes, a Single Afternoon--and shake these criminals from our national life as a dog shakes off itsfleas.

We will show them compassion as human beings- as they would never do for us-but the leash of power will never be put back in their bloodied hands again. Yes, in a Single Afternoon. It CAN be DONE!! And WE CAN do it! Rise shoulder-to-shoulderand heart-to-heartand soul-to-souland physically occupy the corridors of power in every town, every city,everystate, every corporation in America.

We ask all PEOPLES OF THE WORLD to join us in their own countries. Yes, on a Single Afternoon. Leave the comfort of your home and join the People in the peaceful retrievalof our own Power and in the re-establishment of the Constitution of theUnited States. Yes, on a Single Afternoon it can be done. By ALL & EACH of us. AMERICA WILL BE AMERICA AGAIN!! -Harvey Arden Re: CALL FOR A BROOMSTICK REVOLUTION

Let's collectively decide the day and hour for a peaceful BroomstickRevolution...on, say, a Tuesday afternoon the week before election day inNovember 2008..all those in favor of ending the Iraq War, againstofficially-condoned torture, against 'Patriot' Acts I & II...against thewhole Bush/Neocon strangehold on America and the World...all those who DARE TO STAND UP TO INJUSTICE...

TAKE A BROOMSTICK AND WALK PEACEFULLY OUT IN THESTREETS OF AMERICA...EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US...GATHER IN FRONT OF EVERYCORPORATE GOVERNMENT FRONT, including the White House, the Pentagon,Military Recruiting Centers, Multinational Corporate HQs etc etc...or juststand outside your house and HOLD HIGH A BROOMSTICK OF PEACE...

a trueBroomstick Revolution as enunciated by Seneca Wisdomkeeper Grandma EdnaGordon. KEEP THE PEACE! SWEEP'M OUT!! SAVE AMERICA!!! Below excerpt from VOICE OF THE HAWK ELDER by Seneca Wisdomkeeper GrandmaEdna Gordon...available at www.haveyouthought.com A BROOMSTICK REVOLUTION WE NEED CHANGES in this world, really big big changes.

I'm prayin' they'llbe peaceable changes, not violent and bloody ones. I'd like to see apeaceable revolution, a revolution of broomsticks instead of guns.Call it a Broomstick Revolution.That's right. The People pick up their broomsticks and march together andSweep Injustice Out!Make a clean sweep, a big cleanin' like's never been seen before.Broomsticks against Injustice. Now that'll be the day!

We'll take our broomsticks and we'll sweep Leonard Peltier right out o'prison, along with all the other Innocents.Yep-a Broomstick Revolution! That's what we need!~Contact Edna at rdgordon@hotmail.com A-ho, brothers, sisters, it's in OUR HANDS...Sweep American clean with BROOM STICKS OF PEACE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from a Nebraskan--the young people will decide this election
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 28, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I truly believe that Obama is going to win in November. I live in Nebraska--a rural virtually all-white state--and attended the caucus we had here where Obama got our delegates. It was amazing to see the support for Obama from all these farmers (I am a farmer myself). And the enthusiasm of his young supporters was truly infectious. The support for Obama is strong in my state especially from the middle and lower-middle class. A groundswell of change, that has been ignored or dismissed by the MSM, has occurred and people are fed-up with 8 years of Bush.

Attending the Nebraska caucus, and now the nomination of Obama--gives me a thrilling feeling that must have been what people felt back in 1960 when JFK became president.

The support for Obama is especially strong among the young people. The young people of this country are going to be THE critical factor that propels Obama into office!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here! Here! Posted by: Scientz
Nominate what????
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 28, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we nominate someone that will actually do what they say,it's not going to make a hill of beans who nominate whom.
I hear good ideas but I've also seen him be kind of a dick. We already have a guy like that. Passing out Dave Mathews tickets for attending one of his rallies is 'vote buying', that illegal but never mind that right? As long as they get asses in the voter booth who cares right?
I do!!! America deserves better than more slick huchstering making promises they never intend on keeping.
I'm soory but,in my experience,the only thing you get out of a donkey is a lot of shit.
I think we've been shit on enough, it's time we started flinging it back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally the Dems "get it"!
Posted by: PaulC on Aug 28, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Harry Reid came out to speak I thought "here comes that weak-kneed coward". I about fell off my seat when he promptly launched into a damning discourse on how virtually every war in the past century has been about oil!! Holy crap, was this the same Harry Reid or some body-snatched replica??!!

There was also the Gov. of Mass. (name?) who was outstanding.

And when it was Bill Clinton's turn I thought, "oh crap, this guys gonna be self-centered and totally disrupt any momentum at this point."

Again, I don't think I took a breath during his speech. Bill Clinton is one of the finest orators I have ever heard and he had everything going - and it was all directed toward putting Obama in the White House. It was a magnificent performance that galvanized the hall.

Which is what Hillary had done yesterday. She also gave a performance of a lifetime - nothing petty, all about business, the business of electing Obama.

Finally there was Biden. I didn't know what to expect but I thought he would be basically a used car salesman, slick and unconvincing. A flashy smile lacking substance.

I could not have been more wrong. His son Beau introduced him, told how his dad traveled 4 hrs every day by train to tuck them in at night after their mom died, was a loving caring dad who was his best friend, tears coming to his eyes. And it was genuine, there was no doubt in my mind.

I was blown away because there was no pretense that Biden was some kind of political genius or anything of the sort, he made jokes at his own expense and it felt real. But what I cam away with was here was this genuinely good human being who cared about other people, was a serious policy wonk with long time experience in DC who could help Obama.

The Biden pick was perfect. It really confirms with me that Obama knows what he is doing.

And that goes for the convention. I thought Obama was falling apart, the Dems too. But after a slooow start they are making the necessary changes and have really hit a home run.

The biggest plus of the day was that every speaker talked about differences in policy between Obama and McCain. They finally took the gloves off and are laying out what is truly at stake.

And there was a real emphasis on a nationwide transformation built around education, universal healthcare and the coming green revolution in technology.

This has been a very strong 2 days for Obama and the Dems, and I think they are now taking the attack to McCain the way they should have been all along.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You don't "get it" Posted by: mgmyers79
Some great stem-winding rhetoric!
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Aug 28, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The right-wing MSM's pre-determined narrative for the DNC looks pretty silly right about now. They wanted to make this all about disgruntled Clintonistas, bruised egos, grudges and the ultimate failure to achieve unity EVEN AFTER Hillary Clinton gave that incredible speech! Then, of course, there was the whole bogus "will he or won't he" speculation about Bill Clinton's speech, which speculation was unbecoming to any educated political observer older than 8! (BTW I've been watching political conventions since I was 6 back in 1964!)

HRC's address was particularly impressive; it was aimed squarely at her supporters (a fact far too many of the talking heads failed to grasp) and touched all the right notes ("Are you in this for me, or for that young marine . . ." as well as the Harriet Tubman/"keep going" reference). With this speech HRC laid the groundwork for her own future regardless of this year's outcome; she managed to look both conciliatory AND confidently presidential.

Bill Clinton's speech was also superb, hitting all the sweet spots including these magical seven words: "Barack Obama is ready to lead." Pointing out that the same criticisms regarding inexperience were leveled against him in 92, as well as using his "unique perspective" as a former president. Masterful!

The speech that really blew my socks off, though, was John Kerry's! WOW! If he had displayed this level of passion and fight back in '04, Obama would still be waiting in the wings for '12! THAT was the kind of red-meat stem-winding "give 'em hell" performance we all so desperately hoped for four years ago. Especially effective, pointing out the hypocrisy of McCain's cozying up to Rove and the swift-boaters after being slimed by the same people back in '00!

Biden was great too! Personal, down to earth, tough and sturdy but also smart and focused, hitting hard at McCain's supposed strengths and making a mokery of "Grumpy Ol' Gramp's" so-called "expertise" in foreign policy!

Other highlights: Ted Kennedy and Michelle Obama on Monday. . .these people have more courage, class and intellect in their little fingers than the whole of the GOP!

Looking forward to hearing what Obama has to say this evening! He's definitely got his work cut out for him after the last three nights!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wasn't it the democrats....
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Aug 28, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...... that were lynching blacks 100 + years ago.. Lincoln's party was trying to free them.

Seems they finally caught up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What garbage!
Posted by: photon's feather on Aug 28, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about racist politics! The Democrats nominated a black man for the number one spot on their ticket. Big damn deal.

That alone is supposed to transform the party?!

If the Dems were truly color-/gender-blind in their politics, we wouldn't have been subjected to their race- and gender-focussed charade. Ditto for much of the not-so liberal alternative press. But they are not color-/sex-blind - and they have obviously conned a large number of liberals.

If the Dems wanted to transform the party, they wouldn't have been so cynical as to put forward and to back "a woman" and "an African-American." They would have backed progressives, despite sex or race, instead of marginalizing and excluding them. That didn't happen. No progressive of either sex or any race was given a chance. The Dems backed two right-leaning corporatist hawks. They silenced progressive voices, progressive views, progressive candidates. And they pandered to those focussed on the superficial by emphasizing sex/race.

The nomination of a progressive is what was needed. Whether that progressive happened to be a woman and/or a racial minority or another white man, is irrelevant to me - and I maintain that it ought to be irrelevant to any real progresive. Isn't that what being unbiased means? It used to. There was a time when it was said that what we needed in this country was for a person to be judged on talent, ability, and character. (I suppose that only counts in cases of people wanting to vote against someone based on sex/race.)



Too bad knee-jerkers ate it up. Oh, isn't it wonderful? Haven't we come so far? A woman candidate with a real chance of winning the nomination. Finally, an African-American is given the opportunity and support to make a realistic run for the Party nomination. What childish rubbish! Sexism and racism are obviously alive and well in the Democratic Party, as well as among a huge section of the Democratic rank-and-file.

So now, if Obama is elected, will we not have to pay for the costs incurred in this war with the continued support/approval of him and other Democrats? Will the FISA bill suddenly be seen as liberating? Will it become a good idea that one's allegiance be to the president rather than the nation? Will it be less intrusive to be spied on by a Democratic administration? If you think the Dems are any different on these points, just remember the "free speech zones" (not too) near their convention. This had nothing to do with the Republicans, the neocons, or the Bush administration. And it most certainly had nothing to do with their not having a large enough majority! This was a decision of the Democrats alone: continue to silence other voices; continue to marginalize progressives; continue to shun dissenters. (They couldn't risk the conventioneers being reminded of what they were really voting for.)

Harry Reid gave a speech excoriating past wars for oil? Wow! That undoes all his votes in favor of the current one. (Watch Iraq magically heal on the day of Obama's inauguration! Will transport planes and ships magically appear to bring our troops home, or will they be magcally transported back directly?)

The only thing that can be said for Obama is that he is not as bad as McCain. The only thing that can be said for the Democratic Party is that they are not quite as bad as the Republican Party.

All this hooplah over the superficial is disgusting. I don't give a damn about "symbols." How sad that there are so many who do.

So you just continue to gush over the propaganda and pat yourselves and your party "leaders" on your respective backs for being such fine liberals. I'm off to look for my puking bowl.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Welcome to the Alternet forums Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» Not to worry... Posted by: photon's feather
» Sorry, forgot to add... Posted by: photon's feather