Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

If Obama Wins, Who Will Be in His Cabinet -- And Who Should Be?

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted August 28, 2008.


Obama's advisers will be the ones whispering in the president's ear and pulling the levers of executive power.
Advertisement

There'll be a crush of cameras at the front door of the White House on Jan. 20 as scores of media outlets scramble to record the moment when the new president walks in. But wait -- who will be sliding in quietly behind him? They're the ones who will spend the next four years whispering in the president's ear, sitting in strategy sessions, running presidential councils, filling agency slots and pulling the levers of executive power. They'll make up "the administration," and they'll affect everything from economic policies to war, so it's worth getting a sense of them in advance of the election.

For a clue as to what kinds of people either McCain or Obama would carry into office, look at the top campaign advisers, fundraisers and staffers already around them, for they're likely to move right along with their man. These people both reflect and shape a president's agenda, sometimes wielding the influence to alter both the overall direction and the specific substance of a presidency.

Take the corporatization of Bill Clinton's administration. He had run a populist-minded campaign in 1992, pledging to challenge corporate greed and promising to be the president of working families. Come '93, however, such corporate hands as Robert Rubin were awarded strategic positions. A prince of Wall Street who'd been one the campaign's top fundraisers, Rubin was ensconced as head of Clinton's economic council -- and he served there as corporate America's inside hit man, responsible for taking populist proposals down into a dark basement and throttling them.

In his first State of the Union speech, for example, Clinton proposed that tax write-offs for a corporate CEO's bloated paycheck be limited to "only" the first million bucks. The very next night, CEOs of several major corporations swarmed Rubin at a Manhattan dinner, wailing about Clinton's "cheap populism." Rubin, who'd been a $26 million man at Goldman Sachs, definitely felt their pain, and he smoothed their ruffled feathers with these words: "That's not the real Bill Clinton."

Apparently not. With Rubin counseling that it wasn't good to make CEOs jittery, Clinton immediately dropped the idea. He never brought it up again.

"Tell me with whom you walk," goes the old adage, "and I'll tell you who you are." Who is walking with McCain and Obama? While it has been fun to speculate about who might be the vice president choices of this year's candidates, it's more instructive to rummage through the names on the campaign teams to see who might go inside with the winner.

This month we'll give you a tour of Obama's brain trust, and in the next issue we'll look into the McCain campaign.

The Obama Watch

If progressives look at Obama's team through the conventional political lens, they'll get worried. With some exceptions, these are not the policy people you'd expect to see -- they're not a phalanx of solid, progressive activists, thinkers and leaders with recognizable names. Some O-teamers are even graduates of the University of Chicago's economics department, home of laissez-faire guru Milton Friedman; some are tied to Rubin (Rubin himself is a sometime adviser); a few hail directly from the ranks of corporate America.

Before panicking, however, let's note that little about the Obama campaign is conventional. My personal impression is that he intends to be a serious president who's willing to experiment in order to come up with policies and programs that actually achieve progressive goals rather than merely rubber-stamp the long-preserved agendas of Washington-based Democratic Party insiders.

The upside of his having little Washington experience is that he's free of its constraints and more open to grassroots ideas and unconventional thinking. Obama seems to see the next four years as a transformative opportunity for our country -- a time to make a generational change in leadership, to break with bipartisan corporatism and global saber-rattling, to restore a sense of common purpose (through such big initiatives as universal health care and rebuilding America's infrastructure), to adopt an approach to governing that tries to bring outsiders inside, and to link the democratic potential of the Internet to America's historic pursuit of egalitarianism.

No small task. To get there, he has assembled advisers and staff who can help him find and nurture ideas that work. His people are mostly young, nonideological, pragmatic, expert in their fields, often wonkish, and willing to go against established opinion (of either the Right or Left). This is different, it's risky, and it's exciting.

The glue for this team is not its uniform progressive credentials, but Obama himself. Again: This is risky. I might have to eat these words later, but I think he has a deep core of progressive values, honed by his life experience as a global child and a community organizer. Accordingly, he seems to have assembled people around him who have the expertise to help him make the big changes he has in mind. He's the rudder, they're the sails.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election08, barack obama, election 2008, cabinet

From Hightower Lowdown, edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer, July 2008. Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker and author of the new book Swim Against the Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow. (Wiley, March 2008)

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Few Cabinet Suggestions:
Posted by: armorypk on Aug 28, 2008 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretary of Health and Human Services - Dennis Kucinich

Attorney General - Vincent Bugliosi

Secretary of Defense - Andrew J. Bacevich

Secretary of State - Bill Moyers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice!! Posted by: PaulC
» RE: A Few Cabinet Suggestions: Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: A Few Cabinet Suggestions: Posted by: armorypk
Two words: Samantha Power
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 28, 2008 1:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She should be Secretary of State. She has the foreign policy experience, the charisma, and the youthful energy to take the pace. Also: it is payback time for dumping her in such a cowardly way earlier in the campaign.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your PS smells of spam.
Posted by: colinmeister on Aug 28, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just read it for the third time in 2 days.

Almost as many times as I get a job offer to accept US checks and allow an overseas company to take the money out of my account...

I am NOT saying that "Scotty" is a bad person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your PS smells of spam. Posted by: cats.anon
» RE: Your PS smells of spam. Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Your PS smells of spam. Posted by: cats.anon
Biden is a mistake...
Posted by: adp3d on Aug 28, 2008 3:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as a running mate. He would have better as a cabinet member. For VP there should have been someone who could be presumptive president in 8 years. Biden may be too old by then. He might be good as Sec. of State and will be a formidable party lion some day. Look to the future, in 8 years Hillery will be approaching 70. Obama is almost too young but he is the best we got. Perhaps it could be Michelle in, say 2020?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Biden is a mistake... Posted by: orwellturns
My "Dream Suggestions"
Posted by: Sissy on Aug 28, 2008 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretary of Defense ~ Bill Richardson

Secretary of State ~ Senator Dodd

Secretary of Health ~ Hillary Clinton

Attorney General ~ Dennis Kucinich

I would have loved seeing John Edwards being Attorney General if only he wouldn't have had that pesky little affair ~ or, barring her precarious health issues, Elizabeth Edwards would have made a great Health Secretary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My "Dream Suggestions" Posted by: SoCalLib
» RE: My "Dream Suggestions" Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: My "Dream Suggestions" Posted by: SoCalLib
» RE: My "Dream Suggestions" Posted by: progdem
Let's not forget....
Posted by: jlohman on Aug 28, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert Reich...

Jack Lohman
MoneyedPoliticians

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't always get what you want....
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 28, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is foolish to believe that Obama's presidency will be able to Undo 80 yrs of Corporate influence in gov't.
If people think that all the changes required to return our country to a Free Market Democracy can happen in 4 or 8 yrs, needs to take off their rose colored glasses.
However through his admistration we can begin to move away from Privatization of at least the most essential areas in Human needs- Food,Water & energy.
I have to wonder what these 'Privatize Everything' politicians think, If Americans allowed all services to be managed by Corps, Why would we Pay Public Servants? they would be the useless middlemen. Now that would result in a very small gov't..an answering machine would be all we would need to invest in.
If Gov't continues to Outsource the very duties they were created for, then they become obsolete.These 'politicians' would end up using their 'craft' to take orders at McDonalds, pursuading customers to go for an apple pie too!
If Politicians don't want to compete with a 20 yr old to flip burgers, they had better save their jobs and return the business of managing a country to a governing body.
Funnier is the fact these Corp proponents would end up being the burger flippers who organizes labor and demands rights from the corps!
What seems to have deluded these 'corporatist' is the fact that it is all the workers who support the Corp's- the workers, the consumers..NOT the other way around. Thus "Trickle Down" (Shit rolls down Hill)is fundementally flawed.The masses support the corps, fail to strengthen the base and the Corp they hold up Falls.
People I'd like to see in the Cabinet and top agencies..Kucinich, Mosley Braun,Wes clark,Dodd, Chuck Hagel(yes a Republican!VA admin),But also EXPERTS in their fields (non Politicians & Lawyers)Esp Scientists from all fields, esp Social Scientists (A Sociologist- Urban Dev)
This admin is the first step into the 21st century, but it is only the first step!
So Progressive keep pushing- We need to push dirt back into the 80 yrs the Corps have spent digging this hole.Bitching amounts to nothing if you refuse to lend a hand!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Hightower, you supported Ralph Nader in 2000. Please do so again. Obama's a SELLOUT !!
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 28, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you still think Obama is "progressive" or "liberal" despite the rate at which he's selling out his base and going down in the polls for picking plagiarist Biden, he'll be a BIGGER FAILURE than Bill Clinton or even Carter given that he's ready to pick corporatist / pro "religion" candidates. Prepare to be thoroughly ULTRA-disappointed.

P.S.: Speaking of religion, Obama's in favor of allowing hiring and firing based on religion. And of course, employees can also be mischievous and misuse religion against their employer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» speaking of religion Posted by: mtbarbee
» RE: speaking of religion Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: speaking of religion Posted by: progdem
» RE: Please Max Posted by: Sissy
» Kucinich? A sellout. Absolutely. Posted by: GuitarBill
» I don't agree at all. Posted by: PaulC
» RE: I don't agree at all. Posted by: GuitarBill
Hightower for Ag Secretary?
Posted by: antiapathy on Aug 28, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And how about Al Gore for Energy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elections first, beauty contests later...
Posted by: grindermonkey on Aug 28, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the expense of offending little people, the new cabinet will not remotely resemble the present Snow White and the Seven mental Dwarfs we presently have. Let's get this guy in office and let him pick his own staff. We're electing him for his commitment to support the Constitution and appoint like-minded, qualified people who will uphold and administer the rule of law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Biggest SOB Attorney General We Can Find
Posted by: FoonTheElder on Aug 28, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we need is the biggest SOB Attorney General he can find. That is the only way to put away the corporate and political crooks who have been running the government for decades. That is the only way to send the Bush/Cheney criminals to jail and to get rid of their corrupt system once and for all.

We need someone who is dedicated to enforcing the law and doesn't give a hoot about image and political influence. It's about time these criminals started living under the same laws everyone else has to live under.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Let John Edwards' penance be Posted by: hurricane hugo
Obama = McCain advertised as rights-friendly...
Posted by: loxias on Aug 28, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ONLY reason I see people use as the most important one to vote for BO now is that "McCain would be so much worse!" How so? It's obvious they both have a military agenda, or are comfortable with allowing the corporate rulers of the military to pursue their own. It's obvious they both will hand economic policy over to their corporate masters. It's obvious they will pander to the God lobby. And the Guns lobby. BO is no further distanced from fuel manufacturers than McCain, in some ways closer. It's obvious at this point BO has NO problem with Bill Of Rights freedoms being crushed in the name of "temporary order" as defined by who will be in front of the most payed for camera. My vote is the same one I always cast. NO vote. Until it's obvious that everyone is so disenfranchised with a system bought and sold by the wealthy, with NO care being taken for ANYONE else, nothing will change. The reason you are asked to vote is to cover up the monolithic deprivation of freedom and choice with a lie. At all costs must the Fed and electoral college be protected, for they are the last bastion of defending the mega-wealth of the few. If the guards in Auschwitz had let the prisoners vote before gassing them, would it have been a democracy? Wake up, people. You deserve this transparent oligarchy, and "progressives" unwilling to point out the truth shouldn't be trusted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» what we deserve Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: what we deserve Posted by: loxias
» RE: what we deserve Posted by: PandaBear
Paul Cardwell
Posted by: Paul Cardwell on Aug 28, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a good argument for a standard feature of the parliamentary democracies (which could quite easily be adopted by ours) - the shadow cabinet. This not only gives the voters an idea of who the cabinet will be if elected, but an established contact for the media wanting a policy statement from the opposition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paul Cardwell Posted by: brunowe
» The Best Comment Posted by: EJW
The Meat Grinder
Posted by: Southern Gal on Aug 28, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's advisors, there's compromise with all factions of the Party and the Republicans and there's the legislative meat grinder. It's hard to get radical change in the current system of government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moot question: he's not going to win.
Posted by: lindat on Aug 28, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans are catching on to this affirmative-action nominee, and discovering there's nothing there.

It's pretty sad when the two people who got the best response at the Democratic convention - Hillary and Bill Clinton - aren't on the ticket.

Biden's speech was a dissapointment, and Obama's Invesco circus, planned before his Germany fiasco and the "celebrity" charges that stuck, will only add to the conclusion that this guy is a lightweight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» People want Bill back Posted by: Bobsays
» hahahahahahahahahahaha...you have Posted by: hurricane hugo
It means less than nothing
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 28, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whomever the cabinet is,if they still continue to not 'walk their Talk' we all lose. The Dems are fond of saying the walk the walk and talk the talk, that means they lie. They can't be trusted.
Until they back up their speak with action
he might as well make his cabinet from the cast of RENO 911,because they'll only be another ship of fools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It falls to us to hold them to account Posted by: hurricane hugo
Finally! The Dems are pulling it together! They "get it".
Posted by: PaulC on Aug 28, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me digress from the topic at hand for a moment to talk about the convention (it is relevant):

When Harry Reid came out to speak I thought "here comes that weak-kneed coward". I about fell off my seat when he promptly launched into a damning discourse on how virtually every war in the past century has been about oil!! Holy crap, was this the same Harry Reid or some body-snatched replica??!!

There was also the Gov. of Mass. (name?) who was outstanding.

And when it was Bill Clinton's turn I thought, "oh crap, this guys gonna be self-centered and totally disrupt any momentum at this point."

Again, I don't think I took a breath during his speech. Bill Clinton is one of the finest orators I have ever heard and he had everything going - and it was all directed toward putting Obama in the White House. It was a magnificent performance that galvanized the hall.

Which is what Hillary had done yesterday. She also gave a performance of a lifetime - nothing petty, all about business, the business of electing Obama.

Finally there was Biden. I didn't know what to expect but I thought he would be basically a used car salesman, slick and unconvincing. A flashy smile lacking substance.

I could not have been more wrong. His son Beau introduced him, told how his dad traveled 4 hrs every day by train to tuck them in at night, was a loving caring dad who was his best friend, tears coming to his eyes. And it was genuine, there was no doubt in my mind.

I was blown away because there was no pretense that Biden was some kind of political genius or anything of the sort, he made jokes at his own expense and it felt real. But what I cam away with was here was this genuinely good human being who cared about other people, was a serious policy wonk with long time experience in DC who could help Obama.

The Biden pick was perfect. It really confirms with me that Obama knows what he is doing.

And that goes for the convention. I thought Obama was falling apart, the Dems too. But after a slooow start they are making the necessary changes and have really hit a home run.

Now, after reading Hightower's piece, I feel much better about who Obama has surrounded himself with. Damn, he got my man Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize winning economist who almost singlehandedly dispelled the myths of the free marketeers at none other than the Chicago School of Economics!!

And I had actually written a few days ago that I had the same sense of Obama that Hightower is describing - that sense that Obama has in mind to lead, not be led by the nose by some of these wonks he has enlisted.

This has been a very strong 2 days for Obama and the Dems, and I think they are now taking the attack to McCain the way they should have been all along.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homeland Security
Posted by: vssmith on Aug 28, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wes Clark for Dept of Homeland Security. It is about time this Department fulfilled its promise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and Chuck Hagel Sec'ty of Defence Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: A Note to Lauren Posted by: Sissy
» Department of Peace Posted by: EJW
A few picks of my own
Posted by: popsicle67 on Aug 28, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eddie Tabash- Attorney General
Eugenie Scott- National Science Advisor

Larry Lessig- FCC
Richard Stallman- USPTO
PZ Meyers- Secretary of Education

Linus Torvalds- National Technology Czar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A few picks of my own Posted by: brock_samson
It's time for change!
Posted by: thinkverybig on Aug 28, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The time is now for change and I believe the time is now for "WeMustChange.org" to take off and have millions of viewers browse the site daily. I am asking for help to make www.wemustchange.org a reality. I need an expert web designer who would volunteer their time to make this site one of the top sites on the internet. I also need someone who's business savvy, creative, and is out to make a change, a difference in this world we live. I need your help!

Please email me at david@wemustchange.org

I am not in the position to pay anyone at this time but with a good team, we can make it happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's time for change! Posted by: Lauren
ballots
Posted by: logic on Aug 28, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has voting switched back to community counted hand ballots? If not why bother making up your mind, Diebolt will do that for you. I would personally prefer a president who presents himself on his good policies not his appearance. Why are we still pointing out color and orative abilities instead of examining the essence of a man's policies? We need a person who knows the ordinary concerns of everyday life, not some slick rich kid who has the gift of the gab. We as a nation suffer from savior syndrome. Poliwood spinners tell us what we want to hear and sell us the same snakeoil in a new "improved" bottle with a bright colored modern label. It's going to take far more than an election to eradicate the cancer that has become everyday politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

howard
Posted by: cotton167 on Aug 28, 2008 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been reading Jim for along time and this is the best artical he has ever done .It is great to get some information about people who will be helping to ran this country, makes me feel ahole lot better.

[