Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

A Guide to the Sleaziest (and Most Contradictory) Smears on the Dem Nominee

By Mister Leonard Pierce, AlterNet. Posted August 5, 2008.


The Right appears to be having trouble pegging a consistent narrative to use against Obama; we're here to help.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Each election cycle, we're exposed to editorial-page tooth-gnashing about the media's relentless focus on political personalities over issues. While everyone is meant to make frowny-faces over this, for the GOP, it's the natural state of affairs. After all, its positions on the issues aren't going to win any elections: Help the rich get richer, ignore anyone who's hurt by economic downturns, deny people medical care, promote cultural division, and keep supporting a highly unpopular war. That's a whole lot of hard sells, right there; why go to the public with that when you can just accuse your opponent of being the Antichrist?

Such has been the approach of the GOP for the last 25 years or so, and it worked so well with Bill Clinton (well, except for the little detail of him winning two elections), Republicans see no reason to change the script for Barack Obama. Through their reliable toadies of the Internet, the local GOP apparatchiks, and the wingnut-welfare media, they're pulling out all the stops to make sure everyone in America knows that the Democratic candidate for president is located on a moral compass somewhere northwest of Adolf Hitler and southeast of Osama bin Laden.

Unfortunately, many undecided voters are perplexed. They detect a certain inconsistency to the Right's attacks on "B. Hussein Obama," and they aren't quite sure what they're meant to hate him for. Is he a radical Islamist terrorist, or a reverse-racist Christian fanatic? Is he a fist-bumping ghetto gangsta, or an arugula-munching metrosexual elitist? Is he too black, or not black enough? In this guide to the perplexed, we'll help our right-wing brethren get their stories straight by laying out the case (however bogus) against Obama, noting its flaws and strengths, and giving friendly, well-meaning advice about where they should go from here.

*****

The Charge: Barack Obama is black.

The Specifics: Blacks, as every Michael Savage fan knows, are violent, irresponsible maniacs who commit crimes, take drugs and listen to violent rap music. Left to their own devices, they will say ungrateful things about white people.

The Evidence: The American Conservative makes the case with the sort of genteel care that we've come to not expect from some quarters of the blogosphere: Calling him an updated version of the "tragic mulatto" and lamenting how he fell under the spell of "leftist black nationalist preacher" Jeremiah Wright, it claims that even his Christian faith is "an affirmation of African-American emotional separatism" and calls him a "disturbing test of the best-case scenario" of post-racist America, seething with "a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity." Author Steve Sailer seems baffled that this uppity fellow has made no moves to "forgive whites and ask forgiveness for his own racial antagonism as he accepts Jesus."

The Problem: Some people haven't gotten the message. Everyone from David Horowitz's Front Page magazine to bearded gadfly Warner Todd Huston (who claims that Barry "eschews the thug, rapper lifestyle") claims that rather than being too black, Obama is not black enough, and even Bill O'Reilly, a keen observer of African-American culture, says he doesn't "want to go on a lynching party" against Michelle Obama unless more evidence arises that she's actually black. Come on, Bill! At the height of her husband's senate campaign, she made a tape where she ranted against Whitey, maybe! What more "proof" do you need?

The Solution: Hammer the scary-Negro angle for all it's worth. There's still plenty of N.W.A. videos and Willie Horton footage around just waiting to be used. Most of all, don't forget to follow the lead of humorless culture vulture Brent Bozell, who demands that Obama denounce all rappers. America hates rap, and the more you complain about it, the more with-it you will appear! Warning: As terrible as it is to contemplate, this may actually require you to listen to rap music, lest, like Human Events' Evan Gahr, you accidentally claim as misogynist a Jay-Z lyric that is in fact about men.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, mccain, wing-nuts, swiftboating, attack politics

Mister Leonard Pierce is a freelance writer currently living in San Antonio, Texas. He enjoys metal, gangsta rap, crime fiction and democratic socialism, all of which he attempts to keep hidden from his neighbors.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We are most amused.
Posted by: Christie on Aug 5, 2008 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"getting his diamond-studded monocle stuck in his eye"
How "The New Yorker" of Barack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Come again? Posted by: slydad
A man of the people!
Posted by: PJAW on Aug 5, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's John McCain. Did you catch his act in the supermarket recently where he went to relate to the common folk. (that's you and me and anyone else who has to work for a living instead of inheriting or marrying wealth and privilege the way he and "W" have) Yep, there he was in those $520 Italian loafers, feeling our pain.

Please vote the guy into office and put an end to this ridiculous experiment in democracy once and for all. We're so close to bankruptcy and universal disdain, why stop now? Put Big John in the White House and we can be done with all this crap about human dignity, self-governance and the hope for a better tomorrow. Life sucks for a lot of people around the world, and it ought to suck for regular Americans too, we're just a bunch of whiners anyway. And screw the environment, there will be a few small enclaves left where the uber-rich can survive and carry on the species. Strolling around the compound in $520 Italian loafers.

Oh shit, this article was about Obama, wasn't it. Uhhh.., don't vote for him..., he's..., uhhh..., well, you know what he is, don't make me say it. nudge nudge, wink wink

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A man of the people! Posted by: marie.vorrath
» RE: A man of the people! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: WOW! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Befuddled old man Posted by: Sushi
There's more...
Posted by: ozonehole on Aug 5, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about American flag lapel buttons? Didn't Obama fail to put his hand over his heart when the national anthem was played? And don't forget that Obama went to Europe and was well-received there - what more proof does one need that he's a closet French pedofile?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There's more... Posted by: marie.vorrath
» More good sarcasm (I hope!) Posted by: HughScott
Ignore the distractions, its 'white noise'
Posted by: weathered on Aug 5, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has so out-classed McCain its almost unfair.

Obama could be a very effective team leader, if he populates his Cabinet w/seasoned, honorable leadership and fortifies a plan of execution by engaging the best resources.

Given how compromised this Planet and Country are this could be a small army w/WPA-like tasks to accomplish.

Lets electrify the railroads, lets get back to work!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The current Time Magazine
Posted by: christee on Aug 5, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it just me or am I being too picky, but doesn't the current cover of TIME magazine, with the half faces of the two presidential canidates, make McCain look bright, energetic, and a lot younger than he looks for real, while Obama looks older than he looks for real and with a kind of smirk on his face? Like flattering of McCain and not flattering at all of Barrack. To me it is just another sample of how the press is treating these two.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The current Time Magazine Posted by: weathered
So you think we will have change?
Posted by: douglashoyt on Aug 5, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
rawebb
Posted by: Roger64 on Aug 5, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The logical inconsistencies between smears are of no consequence since the people at whom these messages are aimed are incapable of rational thought.

I want to know when the Democrats are going to run the burned out psychopath smear against McCain. That's not exactly a smear since there is a lot of evidence that McCain suffers from a serious antisocial personality disorder (AKA psychopathic disorder) going back to his earliest days.

We've seen one president who was a worthless, reckless, young drunk who succeeded because of family connections and who found Jesus midlife and supposedly cleaned up his act. You think we're dumb enough to elect a second one in a row. I do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rawebb Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: rawebb Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» RE: Exactly! Posted by: Cybershaman
The Problem: Rezko
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 5, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Solution: Dont say a word about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pin Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: Can You Say Keating 5? Posted by: desidid
THE BAR HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN RAISED
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 5, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain acts like some cute 7 yr. old who screws up everything forcing his mother to pass it off as humorous.Not being able to use a computer is pathetic & embrarassing. He is not GOOD at anything. How did he get so old and stay so stupid. And why the need to be "kind" to a loser. He deserves to have his his ass kicked around not kissed. Meantime, I'll take the nerd guy. When did smart become a social shortcoming? Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 'smear' is on the People not the candidates
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 5, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of us that have been paying attention to the campaign know a whitewash when we see it
and there's plenty of it going on. It not about what the candidate are doing or saying about eachother,this ending is as predictable as a soap-opera or for that matter Pro-wrestling. Truth is if either man wins...WE LOSE. The only diffrence between them is the language they use. We, the people, will get less than nothing. Obama's middle class $1,000
tax break isn't crap. The real middle calss in this country makes over $200,000 a year so a one tenth of one percent isn't going to stimulate much. McCain's plan is a longer war.
Oh BOY!!!! They really make me feel safe....NOT!!!!
Each American is worth 6.9 million dollars,in the last talley. SO how about giving us who live on much less than $200.000,which is most of us, one tenth of one percent of that? That would be $69,000. I'd call that a stimulis deal!
The people hunger for change, are powered by hope and are having these noble wants used against them in an attempt to maintain power by the monied and powerful over we the supposedly powerless. NOT IN MY AMERICA!!!!!
WRITE-IN Jeffrey7 for Prez '08
www.myspace.com/jeffrey1776

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Incomprehensible Posted by: LeaderofMen
One word says it all
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Aug 5, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's "elitist", "presumptuous", etc. The real word that they would love to use (but can't) is UPPITY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One word says it all Posted by: Blondinista
DM
Posted by: dmmaze6 on Aug 5, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ann Coulter, the conservative who hates progressives and Democrats comes by her last name honestly. A coulter is a sharp disc on a plow used to dig in the dirt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DM Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Ann(thony) Coulter Posted by: localhost008
The problem is
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Aug 5, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it seems to be working! The latest polls show the candidates as being very close from what I read this morning.

I have talked to several people who have been very "nervous" about Obama. It's unbelievable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The problem is Posted by: Quannah
» RE: The problem is Posted by: fred_53_99
I love Mister Leonard Pierce
Posted by: Blondinista on Aug 5, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is so funny! Not many writers can make me giggle out loud. I think that we progressives will thrive because we, unlike the opposition, have a sense of humor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

serious concerns about Obama
Posted by: rockpicker on Aug 5, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
center on his ties with Zbigniew Brzezinsky, and his recent statements about shifting US emphasis from Iraq to Afghanistan.

You buy Obama, you get Brzezinsky. Know what that means? Has nothing to do with race or being uppity.

This author focuses on the trivial in an attempt to keep real issues submerged.

Bullshit! Read what Webster Tarpley has to say about Obama/Brzezinsky/Gates/the Committee of the Principals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: serious concerns about Obama Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: serious concerns about Obama Posted by: rockpicker
» RE: rockpicker.... seriously Posted by: Quannah
Why aren't we looking at the craziness of McCain?
Posted by: nomomorons on Aug 5, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain accuses Obama of using the race card, Obama responds, the MSM then focuses not on McCain's charges but on Obama's response!

Now it is inescapable that the MSM is following the same tactics and strategy of the wing-nuts. Probably with the same results; appealing to the lowest common denominator works for a while but it is so divisive that, by the time you finish with the slice-and-dice, you end up with a very small portion.

Enter the new, alternate, media, which has been focusing (more or less) on unification.

Bye Bye Big Boys!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you forgot "infanticide-supporter"
Posted by: wefearwhatwedontunderstand on Aug 5, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw an article on the huffpost yesterday - http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/pattysc/gG5zjY - about the swiftboat people perpetrating this infanticide angle to upset catholics in particular. The charge is based on his voting record in Illinois, and he opposed some bill that doctors also opposed, but it will be used to "prove" that barak obama is a baby killer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Far Right Out In The Cold...
Posted by: shinseiji on Aug 5, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..for the time being. Save for the dedicated fraction of Scaife-type big money wingnuts, the majority of the U.S. capitalist class has opted for Obama this time around. Not to mention global capitalists, for whom Obama is their first "President of the World".

That is because the U.S.A. faces a historic "perfect storm" of converging problems, and the usual right wing government of one shade or another that has been in power continuously since it became "morning again in America" back in 1980 - and that includes the "moderate right" government of Bill Clinton - just ain't going to cut it this time.

So the wingnuts are put on the shelf for future use. This doesn't mean the capitalist ruling class "controls" events to the point that it is just a matter of swapping Bush for Obama. On the contrary, this class - split into competing factions and exposed to international pressure - faces the possibility that after acquiescing to marinating American's brains in right wing poison for the past 30 years, that public may not be up to the desired sudden change in course and may trip over its own prejudices.

But in that case they'll get McCain as a safety backstop, if not the optimum result.

The Money is behind Obama!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uppity Obma
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 5, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On April 16, 2008, the Los Angeles Times published an article by David K. Shipler titled,"The Resonance of Racism."

In his op-ed piece, Shipler wrote, "'Elitist' is another word for 'arrogant,' which is another word for 'uppity' -- that old calumny applied to blacks who stood up for themselves."

I have been voting in presidential elections since 1956 and this is the first time in my memory a candidate (Obama) has been called "arrogant."

I also was raised in the Deep South (Texas, Louisiana and Florida) by liberal white parents who taught me never to say "nigger." Even writing the word for this comment makes me feel queasy. But let's talk straight what both Democrats (i.e. Hillary) and Republicans have done and are doing now when they call Obama "arrogant." They are saying through an easily understood code word that he's an "uppity nigger" -- a term I heard thousands of times during my childhood. For closet racists to suggest other otherwise shows they think tolerant Americans are either stupid or inconsequential.

Because of the ongoing GOP smear campaign against Obama, I added a new reason to vote against McCain on my recently launched nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com

McCain promised in February not run a negative campaign. Then, five months later, rather than discuss important issues like high energy prices and rising unemployment, McCain and his handlers unleashed a scurrilous attack on Barack Obama's character, such as labeling him "arrogant" -- a substitute for "uppity" with racial overtones. Never mind that arrogance is a quintessential quality of anyone seeking to become the most powerful leader on Earth, including Senator McCain.


Another reason on UnfitMcCain.com's home page summarizes my investigation of "Songbird" McCain's behavior as a POW in North Vietnam. The facts-check shows how how he distorted his so-called "heroic" war record and exploited it for political gain. Part of the information is based on my recent communications with a former POW.

If you agree with my arguments and love America, please tell your family and friends about UnfitMcCain.com.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican and former McCain supporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The full narrative to date
Posted by: LMNOP on Aug 5, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's narrative defines him as the out-of-touch, inexperienced, arrogant, unpatriotic Muslim who bowls like a girl, drinks iced tea and orange juice (geek!), and is married to the reincarnated Angela Davis with whom he intends to get whitey.

For old times' sake, and just to refresh everyone’s memory, recall how the Republicans recast Gore in 2000 as the wooden, sighing, megalomaniacal, effete, out of touch, stuffed shirt liberal and green hypocrite.

Then four years later, they successfully turned Kerry into an elitist blue blood, Frenchified dandy and effete lap poodle living off of his wife's catsup fortune, a pathologically indecisive flip-flopper, and, when that didn't seem like enough, the coup de grace at the end, the swift boating, turning him into a fraudulent war hero.

Hillary was morphing into the the cackling, ball-busting, insincere chameleon on the campaign trail (adopting phony accents) when she was suddenly derailed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republican Children Say the Darndest Things About Barack Obama!
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 5, 2008 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Should Be Very Clear To Everyone Here
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Aug 5, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama can not just enter into office and make changes that are NOT authorized by his masters.

McCain can not just enter into office and make changes that are NOT authorized by his masters either!

Whomsoever is elected or SELECTED as Bush Jr. was as President of this nation, will be governed by the Mutlinationals in all of their various forms, the Military Industrial Complex, The so-called "Royal Family" and the International Bankers {families}.

Will Obama win the office of President of the United States of America? I truly believe he will simply because he is the chosen. He is a black male {the symbol of the downtrodden} here in the U.S. I tell you something else, I would not be surprised if his Vice Presidental candidate was not an American Indian, Asian or white female. This would garner him even more support amongst those who feel "leftout" of the political institution.

I do not believe in any way that this is simply a social movement brought about by the international influence of Hip-Hop among people of all ethnicities. However Hip-Hop and Rap have permeated the globe! Therefore its influence like eariler forms of Black music, is profound. However unlike the past, this generation is not as divided on so-called "race" issues.

Take note though, everything they {those in power and control} do, is planned. I would love to believe that Obama and McCain are spiritually cognizant people. I would love to "believe" that anyway.

However upon serious investigation over a span of many years on my part, I have discovered that hidden powers behind our government and others have controlled nations through banking and manipulation for hundreds of years now; however, the real sad part is that they have also brainwashed the public to such an extent, that they actually believe they can make a change by voting for a particular candidate!

Well I am going to observe and note as usual. My vote will be placed with my spiritual being in mind. For those of you working on either campaigns, look behind the men into the shadows and there you will find the true powers that be. It will then be up to you to "decide" if you wish to embrace the Architects of Evil.

Peace & Love: Terrific

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What another POW thinks of Songbird McCain
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 5, 2008 7:58 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following text was extracted from my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com

In an article published in June 2008 by Military.com, Phllip Butler, a Navy pilot and U.S. Naval Academy graduate who spent more than eight years in North Vietnam as a prisoner ff war, explained why he would not support McCain for the presidency.

Here are excerpts from Butler’s Internet posting:

Believe me when I say that back then I would never in a million years have dreamed that the crazy guy across the hall would someday be a Senator and candidate for President! John was a wild man. He was funny, with a quick wit and he was intelligent. But he was intent on breaking every regulation in our four-inch-thick USNA Regulations book. And I believe he must have come as close to his goal as any midshipman who ever attended the Academy.

I could tell many other midshipman stories about John that year and he unbelievably managed to graduate though he spent the majority of his first class year on restriction for the stuff he got caught doing. In fact he barely managed to graduate, standing 5th from the bottom of his 800-man class. I and many others have speculated that the main reason he did graduate was because his father was an Admiral, and also his grandfather, both Naval Academy graduates.

I furthermore believe that having been a POW is no special qualification for being President of the United States. The two jobs are not the same, and POW experience is not, in my opinion, something I would look for in a presidential candidate.

Most of us who survived that experience are now in our late 60’s and 70’s. Sadly, we have died and are dying off at a greater rate than our non-POW contemporaries. We experienced injuries and malnutrition that are coming home to roost. So I believe John’s age (71) and survival expectation are not good for being elected to serve as our President for four or more years.

I can verify that John has an infamous reputation for being a hot head. He has a quick and explosive temper that many have experienced firsthand. Folks, quite honestly, that is not the finger I want next to the red button.

John is not a religious person, but he has taken every opportunity to ally himself with some really obnoxious and crazy fundamentalist ministers lately. I was also disappointed to see him cozy up to Bush because I know he hates that man. He disingenuously and famously put his arm around the guy, even after Bush had intensely disrespected him with lies and slander. So on these and many other instances, I don’t see that John is the “straight talk express” he markets himself to be.

Butler ended his article this way:

In short, I think John Sidney McCain III is a good man, but not someone I will vote for in the upcoming election to be our President of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a REAL war hero thought of Songbird McCain
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 5, 2008 8:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following extract, which comes from my new Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com, was written by the late Colonel David Hackworth, a much-decorated career Army officer, Vietnam combat legend and popular TV Iraq War commentator.

During his 25 years in the military, which spanned the Korean and
Vietnam conflicts,“Hack” received 78 combat awards, including the
Distinguished Service Cross, Silver Star, Bronze Star and eight
Purple Hearts.

Before his death in 2005, Col. Hackworth wrote the following:

John McCain is being hailed by the press as a “genuine war hero.”
But is he a war hero in the conventional sense like Audie Murphy
and John Glenn? Or is his “war hero” status the creation of a very
slick publicity campaign that plays on flag, duty, honor and country?

On a purely medal-count basis, McCain outweighs Murphy and
Glenn, who both for years repeatedly performed extraordinary
deeds on the ground or in the air against an armed enemy. Yet in
McCain’s own words, just four days after being captured, he admitted
violating the U.S. Code of Conduct by telling his captors, “O.K. I’ll
give you military information if you will take me to the hospital.”

The facts are that McCain signed a confession and declared himself
a “black criminal who performed deeds of an air pirate.” This
statement and other interviews he gave to the Communist press
were used as propaganda to fan the flames of the antiwar movement.

Accounts by McCain and other writers tell of the horror he endured:
relentlessly beatings, torture, broken limbs--all inflicted during
savage interrogations. Yet no other POW was a witness to these
accounts. A former POW says, “No man witnessed another man
during interrogations. We relied on each other to tell the truth
when a man was returned to his cell.”

The United States Navy says two eyewitnesses are required for any
award of heroism. But for the valor awards McCain received, there
were no eyewitnesses, less himself and his captors.

Our POWs in Vietnam were treated appallingly. The Viets would
either break a POW or kill him. POWs provided info beyond name,
rank and serial number or they didn’t come back. Based on these
stalwart men’s horrific experiences, the Code of Conduct was changed.
A POW says, “Now the training is to give the enemy something…
don’t risk permanent damage to health, mind or body.”

McCain refused an early release. An act of valor? Three former
POWs told me he was ordered to turn it down by his Anerican POW
commander and he “just followed orders.”

McCain certainly doesn't appear to be a war hero by conventional
standards, but rather a tough survivor whose handlers are
overplaying the war hero card.

ADDENDUM FOR ALTERNET: After I posted the Hackworth article on my Web site, Songbird McCain began boasting at town hall meetings that he had refused early release from North Vietnam, suggesting extra-ordinary bravery. Never mind that he had absolutely no choice in the matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

POW Songbird McCain accepted special favors from the enemy
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 5, 2008 8:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following military experience of mine comes from my new nonprofit Web site: www.UnfitMcCain.com.

In 1964, while a pilot in the Strategic Air Command, I went through SAC’s infamous
Combat Crew Survival School at Stead AFB near Reno, Nevada.

Part of the course involved POW training. It began with classroom instruction on
how to behave after capture. For example, we were taught deceptive play-acting
techniques for use during enemy interrogations, to avoid disclosing military secrets.

Later in the field, to practice the techniques during make-believe Q&A’s, we were
required to say more than just name, rank and serial number.

In one exercise while being held “prisoner” in a mock Russian POW camp, I was
taken to a small office for questioning, seated and left alone. Displayed on the table
before me were three items: a cigarette, Zippo lighter and Styrofoam cup of hot
chocolate. I knew the drill. I could drink the hot chocolate but not smoke the cig.

Accepting favors such as cigarettes while in captivity is a blatant violation of the Code
of Conduct for prisoners of war. Food is different; a POW is obligated to eat all he
can, when he can, and then share the information with fellow POWs so his rations
can be divided among the other men based on the estimated calories consumed.
This was especially important during WWII to fight starvation in German and
Japanese internment camps. Conversely, cigarettes have no food value and are
considered enemy gifts with a price tag attached -- such as revealing classified
information.

Section III of the Code of Conduct states, “I will accept neither parole nor special
favors from the enemy.” Alone in the mock POW interrogation room, by lighting
up with the Zippo, I would have been accepting a “special favor.” I also would’ve
signaled weakness on my part, which is typical of persons addicted to one of the
most powerful stimulants known to man: nicotine.

Even though I was a heavy smoker back then and had the craving—big time!—I
avoided the temptation and grabbed the cup of hot chocolate instead.

Before I could drink the nourishing beverage, my “Russian interrogator” rushed
back into the room and slapped the cup out of my hand. Later, during a critique of
my POW performance, I was commended for not going for the weed.

In McCain’s 1999 autobiography, Faith of My Fathers, he admitted to smoking
cigarettes provided him by his captors. It’s reasonable to assume the North
Vietnamese weren’t aware he was addicted to nicotine. Thus, if McCain, a two packs
a day smoker, had initially refused the tobacco favor, nothing would’ve been said or
inferred.

On the other hand, when he took that first puff, his captors knew instantly McCain
had a weakness that could make him more vulnerable to disclosing military secrets
during interrogations, which he did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for supporting UnfitMcCain.com
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 5, 2008 10:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seven days ago, I started tracking hits on my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com.

On the home page, I request visitors to recommend UnfitMcCain.com to family and friends with five emails that ask each recipient to do the same.

Amazingly, after 202 hits on Day One, the total jumped yesterday to 105,211!

Thanks again and please keep the Anti-McCain Straight Talk Express rolling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How could anyone
Posted by: rockpicker on Aug 5, 2008 11:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
write about the sleaziest attacks against Obama without mentioning Larry Sinclair?

You think AlterNet is all we read?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Calling Out To The Low Information Rebpublican Voter!
Posted by: desidid on Aug 8, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you say Keating 5 of course not, because our MSM doesn't bring it up and Obama won't. So the ignorant will say Rezko a local Chicago criminal(?), but have no idea as to the nature of Republican's (including the "Maverick") history of high crimes against a nation. Well if you think Tony Rezko has more influence than Charles Keating and his gang, you are the lowest of the low information voters. Google Keating 5, Silverado Saving and Loan, and the Cablevision monopoly hearing and you will find the names Bush and McCain in one or more of these events. So vote for him and against yourself, and while you're at it, shoot yourself in the foot. After all, anything is better than a Black President right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just use the same tactics back. good for the goose...McCane is the Anti-Christ!
Posted by: Setnakt on Aug 8, 2008 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Biblical scholars in Colorado Springs have uncovered startling evidence that Senator John McCain may be the Antichrist. Their conclusions, while highly controversial, may have a dramatic impact on the 2008 elections, since many Bible-believing Christians have already expressed doubts about McCain's fealty to Christianity.

The analysis was conducted by the respected True Bible Society, and it will be published next month in the End Times Journal.

The analysis was especially ironic, given that it came out just one day after McCain was accused of subtly hinting that Barack Obama could be the Antichrist. McCain ran a commercial depicting Obama as "The One," giving rise to charges that he was sending a subliminal messages to anti-Obama Christians.

"What started us looking at this issue is the fact that Senator McCain has declared his intention to maintain US forces in Iraq for a hundred years," said David Jenkins, a leading Biblical scholar. "That means that McCain wants to control Babylon for at least a century." According to many scholars of the Book of Revelation, the Antichrist will try to rebuild the ancient city of Babylon in order to use it as a springboard for an international effort at world domination. Ultimately, the Antichrist will marshal forces from Babylon to spark a showdown with Christian and Jewish-led forces in the battle of Armageddon.

"We believe that the End Times is near, based on the pattern of wars, earthquakes. and other strange phenomena we've been witnessing since the start of the New Millennium," said Jenkins. "Given that it may be imminent, the person who controls Babylon must be the Antichrist." Until 2003, many Christians believed that Saddam Hussein might be the Antichrist, since he started excavations to restore Babylon in the mid 1970s. But Hussein's death meant that the Antichrist is someone else. Since Obama wants to get out of Iraq, he can't be the Antichrist either, concluded Jenkins.

Jenkins said his teams suspicions were further heightened when genealogical research showed that McCain's great-grandfather was actually not John McCain, but John Mihai. Mihai is an ancient Romanian name, and according to Bible-believing Christians, the Antichrist is likely to be a Romanian. "What clinched it for us was that the name Mihai means 'who is like the Lord,'" said Jenkins. "As far as we're concerned, that was enough. It means that McCain might easily pretend to be the Redeemer."

McCain's geniality and folksiness are consistent with his being the Antichrist, Jenkins said. "Many people think that the Antichrist will be a evil-seeming leader, but in fact the Bible tells us that he will be charming."

So far the McCain campaign has refused to comment on Jenkins' study.

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/dreyfuss/343356

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE NEW YORK TIMES TOLD THE NATION THAT DEWEY HAD WON AND HARRY
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 9, 2008 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truman had lost. The American voter could do that one more time. The mainstream media is trying to tell us that McCain is going to win.

It is time for the voters to prove the media wrong one more time. Harry Truman said that as long as you have the democratic party you don't need a third party. Well Harry that might have been true when you were president. But, you are not here to run.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]