Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

McCain Has No Clue on Tech Issues

By Jonathan Stein, MotherJones.com. Posted July 21, 2008.


Obama has positions on broadband access and using the Internet as a tool to increase government accountability. McCain? Big nothing.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


Political observers have made much of John McCain's admission that he cannot use a computer without assistance. In a campaign where McCain's opponent is 25 years younger than him, the factoid is potent ammunition for those who argue McCain is out of touch and too old for the presidency. But not knowing your way around a MacBook doesn't mean you can't be president. And McCain's personal Ludditism isn't a deal breaker for tech leaders. "I don't give a damn if McCain ever turns on a computer or not," Michael Arrington, coeditor of the blog TechCrunch wrote in January. "I just want a president who has the right top-down polices to support the information economy."



And where is McCain on tech policy? Not so shockingly, the computer-free senator's campaign is not as plugged in as his rival's. In fact, his campaign website fails to address America's lagging performance on broadband access or affordability, the technological capabilities of the federal bureaucracy, or the Internet's ability to increase government transparency. "There are red flags," says Brian Reich, author of the book Media Rules!: Mastering Today's Technology to Connect With and Keep Your Audience and the former editor of Campaign Web Review, a blog that tracked the use of the Internet by candidates, campaigns, and activists.



Barack Obama has embraced the Internet, with his thunderous online fundraising and sophisticated MyBO website. (Plus, he's comfortable talking about what's on his iPod.) Unsurprisingly, high-tech leaders hail his comprehensive tech policies.



Last fall, Obama went to Google headquarters to unveil his proposals related to information technology. He covered the waterfront: broadband access, federal funding for the sciences, using the Internet as a tool to increase government accountability, and more. He promised to appoint the nation's first Chief Technology Officer, a high-level staffer who will make sure that every federal agency has "best-in-class technologies" and uses best practices.



On his campaign website, Obama provides plenty of data on his information-technology stances:




  • He supports net neutrality, a pet issue of the netroots. Net neutrality would prohibit network providers from making websites load faster if their owners pay higher fees. In Obama's America, accessing www.nbc.com will take no more or less time than logging on to www.stuffwhitepeoplelike.com.


  • An Obama administration would seek to provide all Americans access to broadband Internet, the same way they have access to phones.


  • Obama says he would make technology literacy a priority for public schools.


  • His administration would aim to use technology--specifically, a nationwide switch to electronic medical records--to make health care more affordable.


  • Obama has proposed a "Clean Technologies Deployment Venture Capital Fund," funded by $10 billion annually, that would make sure new renewable energy ideas make it to market.


  • He supports increasing federal funding for research in the sciences, and would emphasize math and science at K-12, undergraduate, and graduate levels.



Obama also calls for using technology to increase the transparency and effectiveness of the federal government. He has called for creating a single government website to track grants, contracts, earmarks, and lobbyist contracts. He'd like to see the business of federal agencies conducted over live feeds that can be watched by anyone with an Internet connection. He calls for the federal government to "employ all the technological tools available to allow citizens not just to observe, but also to participate" in these meetings. And there's more: Cabinet officials hosting national town halls on the Internet; permitting members of the public to post comments on pending bills on the White House website; federal agencies employing blogs, wikis, and social networking tools. He'd like to see the US government as connected--and interconnected--with itself and the citizenry as technologically feasible.



The plan has won over techies. Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig, a demigod of the tech community, endorsed the Democrat, saying, "Obama has committed himself to a technology policy for government that could radically change how government works." Eric Schmidt, the chairman and CEO of Google, has said, "Senator Obama's plan would help make sure that the Internet remains a free and open platform, and that America maintains an atmosphere of high-tech growth and innovation."



John McCain, as of yet, has few such fans in the tech sector. His campaign website does not have a section about technology. Sprinkled throughout the site are a handful of references to tech issues. He promises to keep the Internet free of taxes, so "this engine of economic growth and prosperity" will not be threatened. He advocates the "rapid deployment of 21st century information systems and technology" that would allow "doctors to practice across state lines." He would set up a $300 million prize for the developer of a "battery package that has the size, capacity, cost and power to leapfrog the commercially available plug-in hybrids or electric cars."



Several passages mentioning technology (and using plenty of capitalization) are obtuse:


  • "John McCain Will Streamline The Process For Deploying New Technologies And Requiring More Accountability From Government Programs To Meet Commercialization Goals And Deadlines."
  • "John McCain Will Ensure Rapid Technology Introduction, Quickly Shifting Research From The Laboratory To The Marketplace."



But McCain's site is most elaborate when it refers to the danger the Internet poses to America's children, noting that McCain "has been a leader in pushing legislation through Congress that requires all schools and libraries receiving federal subsidies for Internet connectivity to utilize technology to restrict access to sexually explicit material by children using such computers." It also reports that "John McCain has taken a hard line against pedophiles that would use the Internet to prey upon children by proposing the first-of-its-kind national online registry for persons who have been convicted of sex crimes against children."



Though McCain echoes Obama's call for greater government transparency, his website says little about how technology and the Internet can further that cause. There is no mention of increasing access to broadband. When asked about this in a ZDNet News questionnaire, McCain adopted a classically conservative approach, saying government policies should "promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices and higher-quality services for consumers."



His website also lacks a statement on net neutrality. When prompted, though, he has seemed to come out against it, saying, "When you control the pipe you should be able to get profit from your investment," suggesting a philosophical opposition to neutrality. He has also made a dismissive reference to net neutrality as an attempt to "micromanage American business and innovation."



The McCain campaign did not return an emailed request for comment.



Reich, the former editor of Campaign Web Review, isn't willing to dismiss McCain's thin tech stance out of hand. "Most policy development is done by advisers and staff, so just because he doesn't have a technology policy that is clearly articulated doesn't mean I'm going to give up on the prospect of John McCain being a supporter of future innovation," he says. "But he does have various gaps to fill in."



McCain's problem is that Obama has raised the bar. "All the people I know in the technology space are backing Barack Obama and not John McCain," says Reich. That provides McCain with little incentive to do better. "John McCain probably has thoughts and feelings on technology," Reich adds. "But he doesn't see it as an electoral priority to talk about the role technology is going to play in our society going forward, because he's not going to raise any money from Silicon Valley liberals. I think it's both a policy deficiency in his platform and a political deficiency in his strategy."



Michael Cornfield, author of Politics Moves Online: Campaigning and the Internet and a founder of George Washington University's Institute for Politics, Democracy, and the Internet, describes McCain's approach to technology as "tangential." In a charitable interpretation of McCain's lack of an information technology platform, Cornfield points out that it mirrors the "classic Republican approach to the economy: laissez-faire, except where family values come into play. McCain doesn't post any plans for technological development because the best plan from this perspective is, 'Stay out of R&D's way.'"



There is, of course, a less kind alternative. Andrew Rasiej, the founder of the blog techPresident and the Personal Democracy Forum, says, "McCain's interest in tech policy is about as robust as the Horse Traders Association's interest was in steam engines."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: mccain, barack obama, election 2008, tech issues

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No clue
Posted by: operdoc on Jul 21, 2008 3:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's safe to say at this point that McClain doesn't have a clue about much of anything. Hopefully, he knows where Arizona is. He should go home and retire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No clue Posted by: constitution, what constitution
» RE: No clue Posted by: xmvince
It's Revealing
Posted by: guybjones on Jul 21, 2008 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain's inability to use a personal computer and apparent unwillingness to learn how to do so speak of a whole host of negative traits. It's the equivalent of a presidential candidate not knowing how to use a telephone in the 1950's. It reveals McCain's stubbornness, laziness and an unwillingness to educate himself and expand his knowledge and abilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Revealing Posted by: VZEQICVA
government interactive sites will be about as corrupt as the government
Posted by: Suzon on Jul 21, 2008 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in the UK, the No.10 website hosts online petitions but seems to manipulate the technology to bar certain posters or, probably more likely, make it harder to sign petitions the government doesn't like.

I have never been able to access certain petitions on the website when I've pasted in the URL. When I attempt to use its search facility using very specific keywords, I either get "no match was found" or a long list of irrelevant press releases!

Banks, I've found, do the same thing: make a show of access and then find a way to bar it.

I think McCain's general attitude, whether or not he understands technical matters, would be approving of keeping power where he thinks it should be. At least Obama seems to at least understand where power should reside, even if it doesn't reside there at the present.

I've been sceptical, but his voting record counts for something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you don't like your internet provider,thank mccain
Posted by: edith on Jul 21, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
agree or disagree with him, don't fall for the bumbling old fogee image Mccain cultivates about personal technology. he chaired the telecommunications subcommittee for years in the Senate. That's where the Telecom Act was passed that let's the phone companies be computer content providers, fostered teh growth of Google and Yahoo, and triggered much of the boom in cell phones, ipods and digital transmission.

McCain and his staff have dealt with all of the major lobbyists in DC who represent the Microsofts, Yahoos, Bell Souths, Time Warner, Comcast etc etc.(as did the ranking Democrats on th committee when it was run by the GOP till 07.

When it comes to the politics of high tech, McCain is megabytes ahead of Obama. Whether that makes Mccain more or less attractive to you depends on your priorities. I doubt McCain and Obama in the end differ much; most of McCain's tenure as chair was marked by dealmaking to assure consensus between telecom providers, Democrats and Republicans. This provided a nice revenue stream of contributiions to both parties from communications and software providers.

This cozy arrangement continues today under the "progressive" leadership of the Democrats on the Senate Commerce Committee and will continue regardless of which candidate, both of which are gobbling up Wall St and Silicon Valley contibutions, win the "hearts" of the suffering, whining American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Teddy? Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: Teddy? Posted by: edith
» What about Hitler? Posted by: bizeeb
I'm shocked
Posted by: willd4change on Jul 21, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW, another president that couldn't find his ass with both hands hhmmm. lmao

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That does not EXCUSE Obama or Mccain for voting on Telecom "immunity" !!
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 21, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you people really want someone who is truly ahead in tech for president, you might as well give RALPH NADER a chance. He's been fighting for better quality Internet even though the US has yet to come anywhere close to that of most Asian countries. Obama and Mccain on the other hand are for allowing Big Telco/Cable to rip your asses off with phoney "fees" and more hidden taxes. If this is what you want, then don't let me stop you from voting Obama or Mccain !

votenader.org !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

themanwithadog
Posted by: the man with a dog on Jul 21, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have no fear John McCain will be able to master his computor as soon as he finds out how to switch it on.

In no time at all he will be playing solitaire and minesweeper games taking him back to his wartime fantasies

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Charlow
Posted by: Charlow on Jul 21, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the one thing that McCain knows a lot more about technologically speaking is nuclear power. I heard a clip on the topic on NPR this morning and Obama was talking about nuclear power in a way that appeared to me to be based in ignorance of how the plants actually work. Also, don't forget that McCain is an engineer. All Annapolis graduates are engineers. I am not a McCain fan, but I'm not to happy with Obama right now either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Charlow Posted by: VZEQICVA
All right, already
Posted by: willymack on Jul 21, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is proficiency on a computer a qualification for the Presidency? Hell No; it's no more an issue than one's religious (or lack of) convictions. Not everybody even OWNS a computer, nor will they ever want to. Does this disqualify them for citizenship? Of course not. Mcnut has so many negatives which disqualify him for the Senate, never mind the Presidency that this is a non-issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Songbird McCain: LIE #1 about his “heroic” POW record
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 21, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On July 9, 2008, Senator John McCain opened the door to public scrutiny of his “heroic” POW during a sit-down interview with KDKA Political Editor Jon Delano.

McCain told Delano that he had recited the Pittsburgh Steelers defensive line-up to his North Vietnamese captors as alias for the names of his Navy squadron mates.

McCain added that he naturally thinks of the football team whenever he thinks of Pittsburgh. “The Steelers really made a huge impression on me -- particularly in their early years."
.
"When I was first interrogated and really had to give some information because of the physical pressures that were on me, I named the starting lineup -- defensive line -- of the Pittsburgh Steelers as my squadron-mates!"

Sounds good, but that wasn’t what McCain said in his 1990 autobiography, Faith of My Fathers.

On page 194 of the hardcopy edition, he wrote, “Eventually, I gave them [his North Vietnamese interrogators] my ship’s name and squadron, and confirmed that my target had been the power plant. Pressed for more information, I gave the names of the Green Bay Packer’s offense line, and said they were members of my squadron.”

McCain supporters will probably claim he “misremembered” the NFL football team because he had been a POW nearly 40 years ago. But how do they explain what he wrote in an article for U.S. News & World Report, published on May 14, 1973.

In the incredibly detailed, 12,000-word piece, McCain never mentioned using the names of NFL players during his interrogations. He did admit telling his captors, "O.K., I'll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital."

McCain never described the “military information” he divulged, even though the admission, which violated the America's Code of Conduct for POWs, would have been mitigated by misleading the North Vietnamese about the real names of his squadron mates.

There is only one explanation for the omission: He NEVER mentioned the names of NFL players. That was a fantasy McCain created when he wrote his self-serving autobiography in 1999. It also explains why he later "misremembered" the Steelers. Far from being a principled patriot, McCain is a pandering politician who will say anything to win the White House.

If you agree with my conclusion, please clip and paste this comment and forward it to other freedom-loving Americans on the Internet who want John McBush defeated in November.

In the coming weeks, I will present on AlterNet more McCain falsehoods about his “heroic” POW record. Stay tuned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I disagree. Posted by: 113121
» Looneytunes........... Posted by: carbon-based
The GEEK Squad
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 21, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""McCain Has No Clue on Tech Issues""

Gore already invented the internet, we dont need Obama to reinvent it. Broadband is upon us, the internet is taking over our lifestyle -

McCain, a graduate of the Naval Academy and a carried pilot probably has a much better grasp on all things technical than Obama does.

No one really cares if either of them are technical ( are you going to online chat with them???) thats what he has advisors for..remember Obama has 300 of them to help point out where Iraq is on the map!!! I'm sure McCain has a few geek squad types to help him turn on his computer. That skill isnt going to change America at all!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain is...
Posted by: manderson on Jul 21, 2008 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the Ulysses S. Grant of our time---he does what he's told by the Corporations. Business likes to recruit ex-military people...they're good at following orders without question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain PNAC/neocon ALERT!
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 21, 2008 7:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As reported on July 21, 2008, Randy Scheunemann, a major John McCain foreign policy advisor, said "Timing is not as important as whether we leave Iraq with victory and honor, which is of no apparent concern to Barack Obama.”

Scheunemann issued his statement in response to Iraqi PM Maliki’s comments that U.S. troops should be completely withdrawn by the end of 2010.

For the record, Scheunemann presided over of the White House-based Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which was created by the rightwing extremist (neocon) organization, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

A PNAC board member, Scheunemannof was Trent Lott's National Security Aide and an advisor to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Iraq.

Scheunemann has been criticized for his close association with Ahmad Chalabi during the George W. Bush administration's campaign to generate public support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

In mid-July 2008, The Sunday NY Times linked Scheunemann to Stephen Payne, a lobbyist covertly filmed as he offered to arrange meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and others, in exchange for donations to the George W. Bush presidential libary. Payne said Scheunemann had been "working with me on my payroll for five of the last eight years."

Scheunemann's presence on McCain's campaign staff makes clear that if the Arizona senator is elected to the White House in November, the Bush/Cheney-inspired fascism will continue to rule America another four years. That cannot happen!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Love of the Open Sea
Posted by: Meryl333 on Jul 22, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One doesn't encourage the building of boats when there is no love of the open sea.

twitter: Meryl333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Love of the Open Sea Posted by: xmvince
He's a crook -- but great idea
Posted by: pomes on Jul 22, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the first time this campaign, I have to give Obama kudos. The internet could redefine public accountability.

Congress should always be broadcasting (and publicly archiving) all proceedings. Any meeting or conferences of government and corporate executives that gets a dime of federal funding should be streamed.

If it were up to me, there would be a live streaming camera in every nook and cranny of every federal building. Hell that's what they're doing to us.

Any research material made available to Congress or the Executive should be available to the public. The Freedom of Information Act should be made obsolete because we should be able to Google for this stuff.

And I won't even get into what I'd do to the CIA, NSA, et al.

The only creepy thing left at that point would be the "memory hole effect." It would be nice if there were more failsafes on the "delete" button than the word of a federal agent.

This suggestion is of course in lieu of getting rid of all these parasites, which would be my real answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement