Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

Obama Runs to the Middle

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted July 3, 2008.


What should progressives do about Obama's move to the center?
Advertisement

I was on a panel at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado this week when Newsweek's Jonathan Alter asked me, "Is Obama a sellout?" The question isn't whether he is a sellout or not -- it's about what demands are made by grass-roots social movements of those who would represent them. The question is, who are these candidates responding to, answering to?

Richard Nixon's campaign strategy was to run in the primaries to the right, then move to the center in the general election. Bill Clinton's strategy was called "triangulation," navigating to a political "Third Way" to please moderates and undecided voters. This past week, Barack Obama has made some signal policy changes that suggest he might be doing something similar. Will it work for him?

Take the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, for example. A Dec. 17, 2007, press release from Obama's Senate office read: "Senator Obama unequivocally opposes giving retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies and has cosponsored Senator Dodd's efforts to remove that provision from the FISA bill. Granting such immunity undermines the constitutional protections Americans trust the Congress to protect. Senator Obama supports a filibuster of this bill, and strongly urges others to do the same." Six months later, he supports immunity for the companies that spied on Americans.

I asked Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., about Obama's position on the FISA bill. He told me: "Wrong vote. Regrettable. Many Democrats will do this. We should be standing up for the Constitution. When Sen. Obama is president, he will, I'm sure, work to fix some of this, but it's going to be a lot easier to prevent it now than to try to fix it later."

Feingold and Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., are planning on filibustering the bill. It will take 60 senators to overcome their filibuster. It looks like Obama will be one of them. Disappointment with Obama's FISA position is not limited to his senatorial colleagues. On Obama's own campaign Web site, bloggers are voicing strident opposition to his FISA position. At the time of this writing, an online group on Obama's site had more than 10,000 members and was growing fast. The group's profile reads: "Senator Obama -- we are a proud group of your supporters who believe in your call for hope and a new kind of politics. Please reject the politics of fear on national security, vote against this bill and lead other Democrats to do the same!"

Then there were the recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions on gun control and the death penalty. Obama supported the court in overturning the 32-year-old ban on handguns in the nation's violence-ridden capital. It's the court's most significant ruling on the Second Amendment in nearly 70 years. And in a blow to death-penalty opponents, Obama disagreed with the high court's prohibiting execution of those who were found guilty of raping children.

In a Jan. 21, 2008, primary debate, Obama called the North American Free Trade Agreement "a mistake" and "an enormous problem." He recently told Fortune magazine, "Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified ... my core position has never changed ... I've always been a proponent of free trade." This, after the primary-campaign scandal of the alleged meeting between Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee and a member of the Canadian consulate. A Canadian memo describing the meeting suggested Obama was generally satisfied with NAFTA. Goolsbee described the accounts as inaccurate. Now people are beginning to question Obama's genuine opposition to NAFTA and "free trade."

Then there is the floating of potential vice presidential candidates. Jonathan Capehart of The Washington Post was on the Aspen panel and noted that he has been receiving e-mails from gay men who angrily oppose former Sen. Sam Nunn as an Obama running mate. They can't forget Nunn's key role in shaping "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which prohibited gay men and lesbians from serving openly in the military. The e-mails trickled up, prompting the writing of an influential Capehart column, "Don't Ask Nunn."

It may be the strategy of the Obama campaign to run to the middle, to attract the independents, the undecided. But he should look carefully at the lessons of the 2004 Kerry campaign. John Kerry made similar calculations, not wanting to appear weak on the war in Iraq. Uninspired, people stayed home. There are millions who care about the issues from which Obama is distancing himself, from FISA to gun control to gay rights to free trade to the death penalty. Rather than staying home, they should recall the words of Frederick Douglass: "Power concedes nothing without a demand."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, centrist, obama

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Most moderate!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 3, 2008 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals are going to vote for Obama no matter what..but he needs more than liberals, he needs to chip away at McCains base. Most of America are moderates.. and can easily be swayed toward Obama moderate positions.

It was obvious from the beginning that Obama wasn't the "most liberal" senator some were hoping for.

America is more ready for a black President than one with the "most liberal" label.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Most moderate! Posted by: rg
» RE: Most moderate! Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» RE: Most moderate! Posted by: tjkenn
» RE: Most moderate! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Most moderate! Posted by: texshelters
Obama has always
Posted by: aahpat on Jul 4, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
been right of center for my political tastes. While he tosses out highly nuanced crumbs of seeming drug war policy alternative thinking his actual policy initiatives and attitudes are clearly framed by the authoritarian status quo ignorance of the failed war on drugs.

August 2007
Barack Obama: A Stereotype of Conventional Wisdom
Sen. Obama's solution for post-Katrina poverty; police oppression

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When Nader announced Obama Dismissed him
Posted by: aahpat on Jul 4, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saying that Nader would only get 2 or 3% so Obama did not consider him a factor.

In dismissing Nader Obama dismissed Nader voters. Voters who vote our social justice values.

As an American who has voted for Nader every time his name has appeared on a ballot I will continue to vote for Nader or other third party candidates, who better reflect and respect my social justice values than Obama and McCain do.

These drug warrior thug Democrats and Republicans will destroy the world. Traitors:Bush, Walters, McCain & Obama

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's naive to think Obama would act as a ...
Posted by: may261989 on Jul 4, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
beacon to the left. Never in a million years. As an outsider , when I see your major commerical networks on cable: CNN,ABC,NBC,CBS the predominant tone of political news is so far to the right its almost laughable, hell it is laughable. And this somehow reflects the prevailing attitudes of America? You see it even on your PBS with that right wing nutjob Brooks taking up valuable space.
No wonder Obama is going to move to the centre, the slightest sign of any social conscience and he will be shouted down as a pinko commie tree hugging leftie child molester.
So he probably thinks its not worth the risk displaying a conscience on social issues.
What's now considered mainstream in American political media is alarming, you get mainstream reporters interviewing Mike Moore on Health Care as though he is insane to suggest a Universal Healthcare system. In a way it is a resounding success for the neo-con masterplan of keeping Americans ignornant and dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Challenge to Obama and McCain
Posted by: aahpat on Jul 4, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I challenge the two leading candidates for president, Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, to offer America a drug war policy that conforms to the following constitutional mandate:

A Drug War Constitutional Challenge to Obama & McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From the center
Posted by: lamar on Jul 4, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What should progressives do about Obama's move to the center?"

Recognize that a president who governs from the center is more successful? See, for example, Bill Clinton vs. GW Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: From the center??? Posted by: aahpat
» RE: From the center??? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: From the center??? Posted by: texshelters
The Same Thing As Before
Posted by: pdxstudent on Jul 4, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vote for him, all the while voicing outrage at the anti-democratic forced choice of the situation and actually listening to people talking about election-reform---i.e. not reforms in ballot-technologies, but reforms in the electoral system itself.

OR

Don't vote or at least for him, and if not for McCain but for a so-called "third-party," sheepishly repeating liberal democratic doxa about the freedom of choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really sick of whynning cry babies
Posted by: foreverhope on Jul 4, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some find it more emotionally satisfying "fighting" for a progressive agenda, rather than actually creating a mandate to make it happen. Obama doesn't want to win by a small margin, he wants to win BIG, he needs to win BIG to have a mandate. Most voters in this country ARE in the middle.

The republicans are gearing up to eat Barack alive if they can. So-called progressives and liberals that can't understand a presidential candidate, ANY presidential candidate, MUST move to the middle to WIN, is naive. Those that continue to whyne and complain are counter-productive, naive and immature. Nader CAN'T win, so those of you that want him will hand McCain the White House if you can, just as you did in 2000. That turned out well. Anyone think we have been better off with 7 + years of GWB/CHENEY than we would have been with Gore? The world would be an entirely different place. Sure you wouldn't have got all you wanted but it would sure be quite alot better than it is now.

Obama needs to be elected, give him his 100 day honeymoon, than hold his feet to the fire. I will be the first one to help you. BUT for GOD'S SAKE! don't throw this election away or we (all of us and our country) are lost for sure and perhaps forever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wow, idiot, stupid? Posted by: foreverhope
» P.S. Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: P.S. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: P.S. Posted by: pomes
» This is crap Posted by: texshelters
» excuse me but Posted by: clem
Same old thing
Posted by: Romans1 on Jul 4, 2008 1:59 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So there is nothing new in Obama. He's moving right. He has changed his positions on everything from the war to economic policy. It has been revealed that he received a sweetheart mortgage deal. Either he is flip-flopping or he is dishonest.

CHANGE?! Who wre you trying to convince? I don't think you can even convince yurselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Learn to spell. Posted by: yellow
What to do...?
Posted by: gnaw_bone on Jul 4, 2008 7:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There isn't jack squat that we can do about Obama beyond voting for him and getting him into office. End of story.

The real solution to his pandering to some mythical "center" is to elect veto-proof majorities in both houses of Congress and hope that they will have enough spine to stand up for what needs to be done.

Ok...it's a long shot. Show me a better way, people...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What to do...? Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» RE: What to do...? Posted by: gnaw_bone
» RE: What to do...? Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» RE: What to do...? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: What to do...? Posted by: texshelters
» RE: What to do...? Posted by: pomes
Well Amy I Demanded
Posted by: desidid on Jul 4, 2008 9:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and all I've received so far is a canned automated response, which ending by asking me for more money.

This was a response to my e-mail telling the campaign I was suspending my support until I heard from them. I hope they don't think I'm stupid enough to give them more of my time and money with the e-mail they replied back with!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well Amy I Demanded Posted by: sabrina
» RE: Well Amy I Demanded Posted by: Lauren
The Candidate of Change, Indeed
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jul 4, 2008 10:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is moving to the right at the speed of a sound bite. He promised us change, and he is delivering by changing from progressive to neocon lite. We expected transformational leadership, and got transformation to transactional tactics.

As he becomes closer and closer to McCain in policy, he alienates the youth and progressive voters who made him the candidate in what will be a vain pursuit of conservative voters. He also gives people more reasons to vote for McCain and fewer to vote for him. If there is no clear reason to vote for the newcomer, most people will go for the familiar candidate.

Progressives should withhold their financial support and let the Obama campaign know why. We should also support progressive congressional candidates who will, if it comes to it, hold Obama's feet to the fire.

Obama's triangulation is defective ethically, strategically and politically. If it doesn't make McCain president, it will give the neocons the next best thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barack O'Bilderberg ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jul 5, 2008 12:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack will be another corporate shill. He will try to straighten out governance for the sake of corporate efficiency, try to right the economic ship for profit and mend foreign affairs for the multi national corporations.

He will throw a few crumbs to the middle class while artfully dodging the poor. The Super Rich have nothing to worry about. It's the upper middle and not so rich tat will get pummeled, Same thing as Clinton did.

Despite the Chicago economists Barack is all Ivy League oligarchy. Barack's job will be to curb the plutocrats so the Yale -Harvard boys can put the long term play book for corporatism back on the table.

The Reagan libertarians got their pocket picked by the oil mob and the MIC and now the country is careening out of control towards another depression that will impoverish everybody. Barack's job is to put some vaseline back on the pick ax handle that is being shoved up our ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barack O'Bilderberg ... Posted by: Lauren
Every Candidate Should Be Required To View
Posted by: desidid on Jul 5, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Adams to understand what real polictical courage was. I swear I cried for our nation watching this mini-series.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S NOT ABOUT RIGHT, LEFT OR CENTER
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 6, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FISA is a Constitutional matter. Obama claims to be a Constitutional Lawyer and ought to know that his orignal vote was the right one. His voted changed when it became personally advantageous to HIM. As for all those people who made $25 & $50 donatons because they really believed he was the right guy for the job, stay on his back. He shouldn't be let off the hook on this one. Iraq is next. Obama has to be held to his word from day one. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT'S NOT ABOUT RIGHT, LEFT OR CENTER Posted by: Frank J. Burris
Disgusting
Posted by: l_m_n on Jul 8, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is not moving to the center. He's moving to the right.

I highly doubt that moderates and independents favor telecom immunity. THAT screams neo-con.

That along with the gun control, death penalty, abortion, and free trade is a clear sign that he is skipping the middle and moving directly to the right for hot-button issues.

What I want to know... where does Hillary Clinton stand on the FISA immunity thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Disgusting Posted by: Claimsman
Why is the left is still Drinking the Koolaid??
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jul 9, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Haven't you figured this Tactic Out YET???
Obama never said he would end the War the minute he took office. What part of "we will not get out of Iraq as Recklessly as we got in"?
Do you not realize the Right is playing you again? In their Chapter on How to defeat a Dem- Get the Left to question their stance.
Obama is NOT Kucinich, Nor Gravel- Never Was! What Primary Debates did you miss? All of them?
I voted for Kucinich in the Primary Because Immediate Withdrawl was HIS Stance!
Are you clueless- or are you just a infiltrator who claims allegience as a means to camoflgue your true intentions? Are you trying to hand Mac the Win in Nov, because you are doing his bidding for him right now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He did set a time
Posted by: Romans1 on Jul 9, 2008 7:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He said, "by the end of 2009"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Claimsman
Posted by: Claimsman on Jul 9, 2008 11:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets get something straight: Obama is not "running to the middle". He is running to the RIGHT. I am beginning to wonder if he is trying to get his base of supporters to stay home on election day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong Title
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 10, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is a DLC (Read Repugnican Lite), just like Billary.
He shouldn't have gotten the nomination just like Billary.

If the Democrats don't stop acting like Republicans (my 2 'Democratic' Senators voted for Telecomm Immunity) I'll tell you what I'll do :
Nothing
NOTHING
N-O-T-H-I-N-G
No money
No legwork
No volunteering
No voting for any 'Democrat'.

As a Progressive I am tired of being left to twist in the wind by 'Democrats' who think we can be ignored because we have nowhere else to go as they sell out (and cash in).

What's wrong with this picture-
Most Americans want us out of Iraq, want Universal Healthcare Coverage, support Card Check in the workplace, more stringent environmental laws, oppose 'Free Trade' , etc.
Yet we get GATT, WTO, The War in Iraq, 'Right-to-Work' States and the worst and most expensive healthcare system in the world, and ever more lax enforcement of environmental laws.

There are not two parties- there is one, and it has two branches. The Money Party has a democratic branch and a republican branch. It doesn't matter which branch you vote for, because the Money Party has the deck stacked.

Mr Obama- wake up or lose this election. There is already one pandering, fact-challenged Republican in the race. We do not need another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The middle?
Posted by: driftwolf on Jul 10, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously the person who wrote the headline doesn't actually understand what "left" and "right" mean on the political spectrum. There are no "left" candidates in mainstream US politics, they're all on varying degrees of "right".

Obama isn't moving to the middle - he's moving right, WAY right. Suddenly the very narrow divide between Republican and Democrat became even narrower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The middle? Posted by: Sum Won