Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

How Obama Could Radically Alter the Election Map This Fall

By Adam Doster, In These Times. Posted July 7, 2008.


Obama's experience as an organizer taught him a crucial lesson: Activating underrepresented communities can dramatically alter close elections.
Advertisement

Nineteen ninety-two was a crucial election year in Illinois. Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton was hoping to carry a swing state that President George H.W. Bush had won by a scant 2 percentage points four years earlier, and Illinois' Cook County Recorder of Deeds Carol Moseley Braun was attempting to become the nation's first African-American female senator. Close observers believed that a swell in black turnout could make the difference in both contests, but activists feared that the leadership of Chicago's Democratic Party -- which historically hadn't pushed registration in majority-black wards -- would squander the opportunity.

In stepped a young organizer named Barack Obama. Fresh out of Harvard Law School, Obama moved to Chicago to head up the local branch of Project Vote, a D.C.-based non-partisan voter registration organization focused in low-income communities of color. Recruiting staff and volunteers from community groups and black churches, he helped train 700 deputy registrars and devised a comprehensive media campaign based around the slogan "It's a Power Thing." His volunteers hit the streets and registered more than 150,000 black voters in only six months. According to a 1993 report from Chicago magazine, the elections "turned on these totals."

Sixteen years later, in the midst of his own presidential campaign, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) hasn't forgotten the crucial lesson he learned canvassing Chicago's South Side: Activating underrepresented communities can dramatically alter close elections.

Using his massive volunteer base, the one-time organizer is now adapting his Chicago experience for the national stage, leading similar targeted drives in all 50 states. Combined with his ability to inspire new voters and the continued efforts of long-established voter registration organizations, a registration boom could reconfigure the electoral map come November.

Why slice pie? Let's grow it!

Lynne Schwartz, a veteran clinical psychologist based in Ann Arbor, Mich., was drawn to Obama well before he rose to national prominence. Schwartz focuses on juvenile justice reform, and Obama had led efforts in Chicago to combat legislation that would have put more juvenile offenders into the adult system. After reading his first book, watching him deliver his famous 2004 Democratic National Convention speech, and learning about his commitment to the Constitution and consensus-based problem solving, Schwartz knew she had found her candidate.

"I kept hearing him talking about healing the nation and repairing the world," she says, "and I resonated with that at such a visceral level."

When he announced his presidential candidacy, Schwartz jumped in, volunteering as the Washtenaw County organizer for the fledgling Michiganders for Obama. Although the Illinois senator wasn't on the ballot in her state and had made no effort to campaign there, her organization pounded the sidewalks of Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti anyway, talking to voters about the confusing circumstances of their early primary and the value of voting "uncommitted."

Their ground game paid off. "Uncommitted" received 45 percent in Washtenaw, beating the 43 percent Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) received in the county.

Following the primary, Schwartz stayed busy, phone banking from her personal computer, hosting local fundraisers, traveling to Ohio to canvass, and even winning a seat as a delegate to the national convention. But her biggest thrill came when the national campaign tapped her to run the local branch of the Vote for Change voter registration drive, a signal that the folks in Chicago were taking her organizing seriously.

Vote for Change is the latest iteration of the Obama campaign's comprehensive electoral ground game, one that will build off the methodical and underreported registration efforts staged by Obama supporters during the primary season. Just in the late contests alone, campaign volunteers enlisted 200,000 new Democrats in Pennsylvania, 165,000 in North Carolina and more than 150,000 in Indiana.

"Recent voter registration drives conducted by our campaign have registered significant numbers of voters across this country," says Obama spokeswoman Shannon Gilson. "We feel like this really scratches the surface of what's possible."

Launched in all 50 states on May 10, Vote for Change has been dispatching Obama staffers across the country to marshal volunteers through the campaign's massive online database and train them in the basics of voter registration. Working with local organizers and using similar "micro-targeting" techniques honed by the GOP in the 2004 presidential campaign, Obama supporters will pepper precincts for the next six months in search of eligible but inactive political participants likely to value Obama's message of change.

"It's reaching out to our base of supporters," says Gilson, "and empowering them to reach out into their communities to register their friends and neighbors."

Chosen as one of the Vote for Change staging sites, Ann Arbor received a full-time organizer from the Obama campaign in late April, which Schwartz says has helped immensely with volunteer coordination and outreach.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: elections, campaigns, barack obama

Adam Doster is a senior editor at In These Times and a reporter-blogger for Progress Illinois.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It really doesn't matter which one gets the White House in 2009 anyway.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 7, 2008 1:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vote for one and get the other. Mccain and Obama are nothing more than birds of the same feather, from moderate/independent to rightwing panderers.

VOTENADER.ORG !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You have no brain. Posted by: Scientz
» Will Nader Just Die Already? Posted by: rgoalierob
» Good lord, people. Posted by: arclight
» RE: Good lord, people. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Good lord, people. Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: Good lord, people. Posted by: CatDad
Win by a Landslide
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Jul 7, 2008 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has already turned several red states blue and there are several pink states that will go his way.

Many people have had it with the worse President ever and they know McCain will be the same.

Obama will eventually win over many people that are currently afraid because of the Fox and othe media fear fueling tactics.

Go Obama!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are correct sir . . . Posted by: Scientz
» You live in another world. Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Yeah, that same weakness . . . Posted by: douglashoyt
» RE: Win by a Landslide Posted by: oregoncharles
voting is one thing, counting the votes is another
Posted by: huricane on Jul 7, 2008 1:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a perfect world, opinion polls might be reasonably predictive of what happens on voting day.

The Republicans have perfected their techniques over the past eight years, and have too much invested to just let elections 'happen'.

There are heaps of academic examinations of the results of the past two elections. For example: 2004 exit poll discrepancies

Here's one money shot (of many):
"In ten of the eleven consensus battleground states, the tallied margin differs from the predicted margin, and in every one, the shift favors Bush."

In all seriousness, when is someone going to request the UN to monitor the 2008 presidential election? Never mind, I'll do it:

I hereby formally request the United Nations to provide an impartial multinational contingent of personnel that will monitor the voting process across the United States of America, ensure the integrity of the vote casting, document any occurrence that affects that integrity, and provide impartial third-party verification of the results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You want change? Revolution#9
Posted by: williameon on Jul 7, 2008 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Caging
Disenfranchising
Intimidation
Propaganda
Black Boxes
Fear
TERROR!
Lawyers
Courts
More of the Same:
McPain/Lieberwhore!

You want change?

Surge
Purge
REBOOT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobama
Posted by: StillStanding on Jul 7, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that Obama's become a Republican and betrayed his base with his rightward lurch in recent weeks, why is anyone on the Left even vaguely interested in him? I've tuned him out and am looking at Nader and McKinney.

Let's forget this nonsense about map colors. Whether McCain or Obama wins, we're going to end up with a Republican in the Oval Office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nobama Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Nobama/No Vote Posted by: edith
» You are hilarious . . . Posted by: Scientz
» RE: You are hilarious . . . Posted by: progdem
» RE: You are hilarious . . . Posted by: Scientz
» RE: You are hilarious . . . Posted by: progdem
» RE: You are hilarious . . . Posted by: StillStanding
» StillStanding . . . Posted by: Scientz
» RE: StillStanding . . . Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: You are hilarious . . . Posted by: oregoncharles
» A professor? Posted by: Scientz
» RE: A professor? Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: A professor? Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Nobama, I must agree! Posted by: donl51
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE IOWA OBAMA ORGANIZING
Posted by: bbfmail on Jul 7, 2008 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://politizine.blogspot.com/2008/01/

Friday, January 04, 2008
Rumor: Vote fraud at Iowa Caucus?
Update 3: I have a new update here: ["Update: Vote fraud at Iowa Caucuses"].

Update 2: Here is some more information: The site was in eastern Iowa, not very far from the Illinois border. At about 6:30 p.m. about 60 locals had gathered to caucus on the Democratic side. Most of the people were chatting because they were acquainted with each other.
At around 6:40, about 30 African-Americans came in, mostly in a group. They provided no identification as legitimate voters in that precinct [and they weren't asked by officials either], they just signed their names to a log, often illegibly, and went in to caucus.
Obama won the precinct.
There are two significant points about this: One, no one seemed to know these people. Since this campaign worker had organized the area for one of the campaigns, this person knew that there were virtually no African-Americans living in the area. They had to have been outsiders. Since it was so close to the border, this person suspects that these voters were bused into the caucuses from Illinois.
If this occurred in each of the precincts on the eastern side of the state of Iowa, it could have skewed the results. It is easy to suspect that Iowa was probably not a solid win for Obama but a virtual three-way tie for first.

Update: I have heard from a second person involved in one of the campaigns that this story might have some legs. I'm continuing to look into it.

I have heard secondhand from a prominent person involved in one of the Democratic campaigns that there may have been vote fraud in at least one Iowa Caucus by the Barack Obama campaign.
This person said that at the precinct this person was covering, a sudden influx of African-American voters flowed into the voting area. This person called the precinct, an essentially white precinct. There were more African-Americans at the Caucus than there are living in the precinct, the person says.
Also, other caucus voters did not know the voters and the African-American voters kept to themselves, the person said. This person suspects that these voters may have been bused in from Illinois.
Apparently at this precinct, there was no identification check or proof of residency check of the people participating. The people came in, signed their names, and that was it.
I don't know if any of this is true but I know this person to be a relatively reliable person of character, with a journalism background. I would be interested in hearing any information to back up this rumor. I also have emails out to other people I know within the campaigns to see if there is any legitimacy to the claim.

Posted by Tony at 1/04/2008 06:14:00 PM


blakmira said...

There is also 11,849 votes still missing. Heard anything about that?
January 06, 2008 3:17 AM

Whether or not it is sour grapes or legit, we may never know.

The makeup of the Scott County is 88.5 percent white and 6.1 percent black, according to the 2000 Census, with most of the minority population centered around the Davenport area. Now, these numbers are a bit old, but the demographics have not drastically changed in the area, according to people who live there. But, if you are in the rural areas of the county, where this campaign worker was, and the residents are almost completely white, where did all the new black voters come from? A flood of unusual activity like that in an obscure area of the county not known for that kind of racial makeup would probably be a bit weird and should have prompted caucus officials to verify residency requirements immediately. Maybe they thought they were being PC. Who knows.

Posted by Tony 1/12/08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Saint Who Gave Up the Big Bucks
Posted by: edith on Jul 7, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Obama propaganda machine states he gave up big bucks on Wall St to slave for the poor folk on the South Side of Chicago. Problem is, O never wanted the bucks because he planned to spend his life on the South Side. He planned from day one at power centre Harvard Law School to seize power and rule. This guy plotted to become a powerful pol asap. Thus his odd run for Congress against popular ex-black panther Congressman Bobby Rush soon after Kansan/Hawaii reared by white family Obama arrived in Chicagoland.

It's all about the Power. Big Govt. Obama can taste it. Can you imagine the rise this guy gets from the possibility of tapping the internet and phone messages of billions of people! Wall St bucks will eventually come along with the usual book deal. In the meantime, Barry Hussein can taste Control. Our very own Hugo Chavez.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IOWA HILLARY YOUTH CHAIR ENDORSES MCCAIN
Posted by: bbfmail on Jul 7, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.truthcaucus.com/2008/06/11


IOWA HILLARY YOUTH CHAIR ENDORSES McCAIN

OBAMA WENT TO IRAQ ‘ONCE FOR A PHOTO-OP’

EXCLUSIVE – TRUTH CAUCUS has received a copy of a John McCain endorsement issued by Cody Eliff, the co-chair of Iowa Students for Hillary. It’s copied below.

Cody Eliff sent a message to the members of Students for Hillary Clinton- University of Iowa Chapter.

Fellow Hillary supporters,

First, we all owe Dylan Lampe a great deal of thanks for his hard work on this endeavor.

Hillary Clinton, the woman we admire so much, suspended her historic presidential campaign this past weekend to endorse Senator Barack Obama. She did this to obviously keep her promise to the voters to unite behind the nominee.

Hillary Clinton has received the worst treatment of any candidate in recent history in a primary from a largely pro-Obama media and from supposed liberals supporting Senator Obama. There has been rampant sexism and race baiting going on throughout this campaign. Whether it be the call by Keith Olbermann to have a superdelegate take her in to a room and “only he come out”, or when Chris Matthews insisted Hillary Clinton was not elected to her senate seat on merit, but because her husband cheated on her.

####

Lots of angry responses by Obamatrons on the above article, because the students, like millions of Clinton supporters, say they will vote for McCain over Obama. And...thanks to Alternet and ITT for once again giving us pages and pages of the latest Obama commercials!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indiana: Case In Point
Posted by: mishawaka on Jul 7, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For proof of Obama's new political strategy, look no further than Indiana. Indiana has not gone for a Democratic candidate since LBJ in 1964, but Obama has taken a closer look at the numbers. Here in Indiana, the Democrats have five of nine Congressmen, one of two Senators, control of the State House, and (until the incumbent) we had a Democratic Governor for sixteen years. How "red" can we be?

Obama has put resources into this state that no one has seen since 1968, when RFK ran. In my community we have actual field organizers on the ground as we speak. In 2004, we could not even get Kerry/Edwards yard signs at our county headquarters. What a change!

The promise of a 50 state campaign is one reason why I supported Barack Obama after John Edwards dropped out. No more "swing state" b.s. If you only compete in 17 states, you are almost certainly ceding the other 33. Obama understands that you need to cut the margins at the very least. Barack Obama may not win Indiana, but he will give McCain a run here. In my Congressional district, we needed to win big in the three moderate counties in the north while trying not to lose as badly as past candidates in the relatively conservative counties in the southern part of the district. Nationally, this is what Obama plans to do: win big in the Democratic areas while controlling the bleeding in the conservative states.

Obama has taken some policy heat this past week, but he has done more for the Democrats in Indiana than any other candidate in 40 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Indiana: Case In Point Posted by: Joecheck
Obama won't change anything without Hillary!
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 7, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take it from a former Hillary hater. There is NOTHING Republican dirty tricks could do to stop an Obama-Clinton November juggernaut! It would be the mother of all landslides.

Conversely, if Barack doesn't pick Hillary for his Veep, he will LOSE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I disagree . . . Posted by: Scientz
Obama supports the idea that "mental distress" does not constitute a legit reason to receive a late-
Posted by: happyhermit on Jul 7, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-term abortion.

Alternet just lets this story slide?

you can be a supporter without being a shill; this is gross.

the abortion issue aside, this is outrageous and cruel mental health discrimination. backwards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I disagree . . . Posted by: Scientz
» RE: I disagree . . . Posted by: happyhermit
» Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: happyhermit
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: happyhermit
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: happyhermit
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Fair enough, but . . . Posted by: EncinoM
» i'm quoting Obama Posted by: happyhermit
» sorry Posted by: happyhermit
» No reason for late term abortions Posted by: foreverhope
3rd World Country-here 'tis!
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Jul 7, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unbelievable democracy we live within, where every election is skewed with constitutional abrogation, phoney votes, campaigns that only death sentence felons can laud and lots of hallelujahs and amens to assuage the remainder. And we have the unmitigated audacity and affrontry to condemn election results elsewhere. Well....here 'tis, we are the biggest debtor nation in recorded history with a dead economy and looming worthless dollar. We're No. 1, unfortunately the ranking is among 3rd world refuse only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA'S IDEAS VANISHED WHEN CLINTON LEFT THE RACE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 7, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now he's lost in some fog that is nothing more than EGO. Suddenly the definitive statements he made early on are now being revised. I don't buy it. Iraq, FISA, the faith based thing. This is not flip flopping. It's saying what it takes to get the nomination and then going back on all of it. If he can't be called on things now, he'll be another "do what he damn well pleases" president. It's time for Obama to answer questions. Hillary is gone. He's on his own. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Individuals saying there is no difference between Obama & McCain are delusional or lying
Posted by: foreverhope on Jul 7, 2008 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The democratic party has moved from left to center to right? It's a crock of shit. You are obviously not old enough to remember the Chicago riots, too young to remember Kent State.

Our democracy is fragile and imperfect but I will take the wisdom of our brilliant Founding Fathers any day over Naderites or a third party. Those that think their so-called green party will be perfect and solve all our problems are badly mistaken or perhaps delusional. I wonder how much time or effort they have put into their local democratic party before beginning their own party.

Britain has more than two parties, they still ended up with Thatcher and Blair and war war war. Germany has more than two parties, they got Hitler. Russia had a revolution, whole new gov't, they got Stalin. Watch what you wish for.

Also, we are not so naive as to not recognize there are repugs among us delightedly exploiting whatever and wherever they can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Dare Obama Not Be What Fox News Said?
Posted by: gradioc on Jul 7, 2008 3:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just love that the Grover Norquist Noise Machine (Fox, Rush, Hannity, et al; they all march to the same beat) have done their best to paint Obama as somewhere left of Kucinich and just right of Mao. Now they in high dudgeon because he refuses to act like it. The Nerve! The fact is Obama wears no label well because he actually thinks about issues and comes to his own conclusions. Wish we'd had that the last 8 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's new campaign slogan- 'Never Mind'
Posted by: chlamor on Jul 7, 2008 5:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never mind that Obama voted to re-authorize the repressive PATRIOT Act. Or that he voted for the appointment of the war criminal Condaleeza Rice to (of all things) Secretary of State. Or that he opposed Senator Russ Feingold’s (D-WI) move to censure the Bush administration after the president was found to have illegally wiretapped U.S. citizens. Or that he shamefully distanced himself from fellow Illinois Democratic Senator Dick Durbin’s forthright criticism of U.S. torture practices at Guantanamo. Or that he refuses to foreswear the use of first-strike nuclear weapons against Iran.

Never mind Obama’s power-worshipping campaign book “The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream” (2006) – the book to which Obama refers reporters asking him for policy specifics behind his often vague statements – refers to the United States’ rapacious, savagely unequal and fundamentally “materialist” capitalist economy as the nation’s “greatest asset.”


Never mind that he joins victim-blaming Republicans in pointing to poor blacks’ “cultural” issues as the cause of concentrated black poverty (The Audacity of Hope)—not the multiple, well-documented, and interrelated structures, practices and consequences of externally imposed white dominance and corporate-state capitalism.

Never mind that “Audacity” also advances a model of health care reform that mocks his claim to support "universal" insurance. Like the [corporatist] Democratic Leadership Council Obama advocates retaining the for-profit nature of American health care, and mandating that poor people pay for it, somehow. His plan is only ‘universal’ in the sense that mandatory auto insurance is universal.

Never mind that Obama voted for a business-friendly “tort reform” bill that rolls back working peoples’ ability to obtain reasonable redress and compensation from misbehaving corporations.

Never mind that Obama has lent his support to the aptly named Hamilton Project, formed by corporate-neoliberal Citigroup chair Robert Rubin and “other Wall Street Democrats” to counter populist rebellion against corporatist tendencies within the Democratic Party.

When politicians offer nothing, and the people demand nothing, then the powers-that-be are free to continue doing whatever they choose. The death knell of participatory politics can often be a very noisy, celebratory affair - such as we have witnessed in the call-and-response ritual of "Change!" "Hope!" and other exuberant but insubstantial campaign exercises.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is Becoming a Spent Force
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jul 7, 2008 9:57 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is, among the progressive and youth communities, rapidly becoming a spent force due to his rapid shift to the right. The record turnouts he inspired during the primaries will likely not be repeated in the general election unless he regains his composure and stops trying to be everything to everyone by assuming he can repudiate progressive positions and retain the progressive vote.

The issues almost all sane voters care about--the economy, Iraq, energy costs, the environment, healthcare, education--have been Obama's strengths all along and he needs to stay on message and stop this consultant recommended triangulation. The more like McCain he becomes, the less reason people have to vote for him in preference to a better known and more experienced candidate.

Conservatives are not going to vote for a pro-choice, pro-gay rights African American, no matter how many other sops he throws them. And progressives will either vote for nobody or Nader if he keeps this up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TO the Obama bashers:
Posted by: droscify on Jul 8, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just go ahead and give your third party votes to Mccain. Lord knows he needs them. Some of us in the real world actually worry about what the economy's going to be like over the next four years, and while I'm no economist, I'm willing to guess an Obama presidency would be quite a bit less painful than one of Mccain. To vote for a candidate with no shot of winning just to feed your ego when the outcome DOES MATTER is selfish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 8, 2008 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is going to raise taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ba Posted by: Scientz
Butte loves Obama
Posted by: ecorover on Jul 8, 2008 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Butte (Montana) America loves Barack Obama.

It's called Butte AMERICA for a reason: Butte represents the working class, small town, open-minded, liberal spirit that has made America great.

When the mines closed and Superfund came to town in the early 1980s, Butte embraced the change and rolled with it. Butte is, admittedly, more like Cleveland Pittsburgh Detroit and other working class cities than it is like most other Montana/western towns--especially eastern Montana where welfare ranchers complain about the federal government while looking for the next handout...

EcoRover http://ecorover.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Constitution has been Murdered
Posted by: Enkidu Nwyvre on Jul 10, 2008 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not once in all the commentary is there one statement about the fact that the Constitution prohibits Ex Post Facto laws. To make a law that "retroactively" changes the law was correctly recognized to DESTROY the Rule of Law. If the Law does not mean what it says at the time it says because it can be Ex Post Facto changed then there is NO LAW....

That above all makes this law a GRAVE CRIME. The Democrats have shown themselves to be as bad as Bush and the Conservatives, what they are conserving I do not know because it isn't the Constitution, Obama unfit for any office and McCain a coward....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

maple story mesos
Posted by: cheap-msmesos on Jul 12, 2008 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
corrupted software tainted elections
Posted by: casting on Jul 12, 2008 10:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama and Axelrod his strategist and Plouffe are so stupid that they are doing zero, nothing to stop crooked voting machine companies like Election Systems and Software who stole election from Kerry. How can the 3 of them be so stupid people, go read blackboxvoting.org. 2 stolen elections in a row and the 3 of them haven't figured out a thing? 3 different Republican owned vote machine companies stole 04 election from Kerry in Iowa, Ohio, Fl. Obama is so stupid he doesn't understand how computer programs are hacked! He wants to be president and hasnot figured this much out yet. Obama and Axelrod raised millions to defeat Hillary and neglected the software driven voting machines that will destroy Obama in November. 2 of these companies that stole the election for Bush in 04 will steal the election again, at least in Iowa, Florida, Missouri. David Axelrod is not even in reality of voting machine election theft. Axelrod is convinced that he is a genius and that Republicans will be different this 08 than 2000 or 2004. Bush's buddies are working for McCain now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 -