COMMENTS: 204
The 10 Most Awesomely Bad Moments of the Bush Presidency
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2008 headlines via email.
As part of our look at the year -- and Bush presidency -- in review, Alternet is "resurfacing" its best and most popular pieces of 2008.
In a lot of ways, choosing the Bush administration's 10 greatest moments -- disastrous failures, all -- is about as pointless as picking out your 10 least favorite hemorrhoids: There are entirely too many of them, and taken together they all add up to a throbbing mass of pain. But unfortunately, history demands that we at least make the effort so that future generations will understand why we perform voodoo rituals cursing Bush's memory before we go to bed every night.
Narrowing down the Bush administration's various debacles to a mere 10 was no easy feat. In fact, I expect that many people will express dismay that their least favorite moment was left off the list. "How could commuting Scooter Libby's sentence not even make the top 10??!!" I can hear some of you shrieking already. Well, I'll tell you. Essentially, I tried to rate each Bush disaster by two main criteria: its body count and its damage to the country's reputation. So while Bush's awkward groping of German Chancellor Angela Merkel may be personally humiliating to everyone, it doesn't have the same heft as, say, the Iraq War.
But for those of you who insist on seeing your least favorite moment get its due, here is list of every honorable mention I could come up with: warrantless wiretapping; Valerie Plame; Scooter Libby's sentence commuted; Bush believes Rafael Palmeiro is innocent; soldiers face neglect at Walter Reed; signing statements; the Kyoto treaty ripped up; loyalty oaths; the fake turkey; a staged teleconference with troops, staged FEMA press conference, extraordinary rendition, support for junk science; endorsement of neo-creationist "intelligent design"; inaction against global warming; record oil prices; record budget deficits; record trade deficits; record number of Americans without health insurance; two recessions; no-bid contracts; bin Laden still at large; the Federal Marriage Amendment; stem cell research vetoed; waterboarding ban vetoed; "Last throes"; "Old Europe"; "It's hard work"; "Bring it on"; "Yo, Blair!"; "I'm the decider"; "I'm the commander guy"; "I'm a war president"; "This is the guy who tried to kill my dad"; "So?"; "Let the Eagle Soar"; John Bolton; Kenny Boy; Harriet Miers; John Roberts; Sam Alito; Blair talks Bush out of bombing al-Jazeera; Cheney shoots some guy in the face; the Military Commissions Act; Jose Padilla arrested and held without charge or access to counsel; endless tax cuts for the rich; let's waste a shitload of money by sending people to Mars and let's hire some Heritage Foundation staffers to rebuild Iraq.
And with that, let's go onto our 10 worst moments.
10: Bush Gets Re-elected

In a way, Bush's re-election was even more depressing than the shady shenanigans the GOP used to get him elected in 2000. See, back then Bush ran as a "compassionate conservative" who promised to be a "uniter, not a divider" who would run a center-right administration like his father did. By 2004, the myth of Bush the Uniter had been demolished by his exploiting the 9/11 terror attacks for political gain, by dropping poison pills into bills to make Democrats vote against their own proposals, and by supporting needless and divisive initiatives such as a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. On top of this, the Bush re-election crew ran one of the nastiest and most negative campaigns in recent memory. The low point in the whole affair came when administration allies and surrogates took to the airwaves to falsely accuse Democratic candidate John Kerry of lying about his service in Vietnam, even claiming in one instance that he intentionally shot himself to get out of the war.
The reason for this historically negative campaign was obvious: As Paul Krugman deftly observed at the time, Bush had "no positive achievements to run on." But this didn't stop more than 59 million Americans from voting to give Bush yet another four years to build on his already-impressive resume of negative achievements.
9: Alberto Gonzales' Congressional Testimony

One of the Bush administration's favorite pastimes over the past eight years has been gleefully urinating in the faces of the other two branches of government. This tendency is best exemplified by Ex-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee to answer questions under oath about whether a group of eight federal prosecutors had been fired for partisan reasons. Essentially, all of the attorneys in question had exemplary performance records but were targeted because they did not prosecute several so-called "voter fraud" cases to then-presidential adviser Karl Rove's satisfaction. When the Senate Judiciary Committee called then-Deputy AG Paul McNulty to testify about the firings, he claimed that all of them had been dismissed due to "performance-related issues." About a month later, Gonzales penned an editorial for USA Today reiterating McNulty's claim that the attorneys were fired for performance reasons and called the entire controversy an "overblown personnel matter."
After it emerged that six of the fired attorneys had actually been given positive job evaluations, Gonzales rushed up to Capitol Hill to perform damage control. He said he "regretted" saying that the fired attorneys had lost his confidence, and then went on to say that he had no idea why the attorneys had been targeted for dismissal. Additionally, Gonzales said there was nothing at all improper about the firings, despite the fact that he admitted that he had "limited involvement" in the ordeal. Gonzales also responded to questions by answering "I don't recall" a total of 64 times.
Although several GOP senators called on Gonzales to resign in the wake of his testimony, Bush said Gonzales' performance had "increased my confidence in his ability to do the job" and that he would stay on as attorney general.
And the fun didn't stop there. When the Senate Judiciary Committee hauled Gonzales back to testify about his frantic hospital visit to get a fresh-from-surgery John Ashcroft to approve Bush's warrantless wiretapping program, it resulted in the sort of clown show that would have put Barnum and Bailey to shame. The lowlight came during a classic debate between Gonzo and Arlen Specter over whether Ashcroft could have effectively performed his duties as attorney general while he was under heavy sedation. After Gonzales finally stepped down in August 2007, Bush stamped his feet and cried that Gonzo had had "his good name dragged through the mud."
8: North Korea Conducts a Nuclear Test
In his 2002 State of the Union Address, Bush stated forthrightly that "the United States will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons." And to show how serious he was, Bush decided to invade Iraq, a country whose vast stockpile contained precisely zero weapons of mass destruction.
But while Bush was busy freedomizing the Iraqis, North Korea -- a country best known for being home of the world's worst government -- steadily built up its nuclear capabilities and eventually conducted a nuclear test in October 2006.
Oopsie-doodles!
While there is a great deal of dispute over whether the North Korean test was actually a successful test, it seemed clear that Bush's strategic doctrine of ignoring our enemies until they meet every one of his demands has failed somewhat spectacularly. Naturally, Condi Rice declared that the test was actually a significant win for Bush administration policy, thus proving once again that down isn't just up for the Bush administration, but sometimes sideways as well.
7: Colin Powell's Bogus WMD Presentation at the U.N.

For those of you who are too young to remember, there was a time when Colin Powell was an internationally respected diplomat and military leader who was seen as the sort of rare Republican straight-shooter who also had a fine sense for global sensibilities. Indeed, at the time of Powell's appointment to the State Department, the BBC described him as Bush's "trump card" and as "a national hero whose charismatic image bridges America's racial divide." But little did anyone know that Powell's public image as a renowned warrior-scholar would come crashing down to Earth less than four years after his appointment.
In February 2003, Powell gave a presentation before the U.N. Security Council that was instrumental in convincing both the American public and large swaths of the international community that Saddam Hussein had large stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction that posed an immediate threat to global security. During his speech, Powell told scary tales of mobile biological weapons labs, chemical weapons stockpiles and aluminum tubes that could be used in a nuclear weapons program. All of these claims turned out not only to be wrong, but based on sourcing that even Powell acknowledged was "deliberately misleading" in some cases.
And what's more, Powell knew how shaky a lot of the intelligence was before he made his infamous presentation to the United Nations. As Bob Woodward reported in his book Plan of Attack, Powell had deep doubts about an intercept between two senior members of the Iraqi Republican Guard that vaguely sortakindamaybe might have mentioned something along the lines of using vehicles for bioweapons labs. Yet despite reservations about the intel, Woodward reports that Powell "decided to use it" for his U.N. presentation anyway. Ditto for an "inferential" report on Iraqi Scud missiles that Powell acknowledged had not been seen by anyone.
Years after feeding bogus intel to the Security Council, Powell said his performance was a "painful" "blot" on his record. Well la-tee-da. I'm sure that's a fine comfort to the hundreds of thousands of people who died needlessly as a result of Powell's Security Council boo-boo.
6: The Terri Schiavo Affair

In what will no doubt go down in history as one of the craziest things our federal government has ever done, the U.S. House and Senate both passed an emergency law to save the life of a woman who had been near-brain dead for more than a decade. The case of Terri Schiavo, who collapsed in her home and who later lost oxygen to her brain after her doctors misdiagnosed the cause of her collapse, was undoubtedly tragic for everyone involved; it was also undoubtedly none of the federal government's business.
After numerous state courts had sided with then-husband and guardian Michael Schiavo and ruled that Terri's condition was irreversible and that her feeding tube could be removed to end her life, the Christian Right launched into an epic freak-out the likes of which America has not seen since 17th Century Salem. After much Tasmanian devil-style screeching and hollering from the GOP base, the Republican Congress passed a bill transferring jurisdiction of the Schiavo case to federal court. Bush, who seemingly never misses an opportunity to take a naked ride on the crazy train, interrupted one of his frequent Texas vacations to sign the damn thing into law.
Ah, if only he'd been this swift and alert when Hurricane Katrina hit (see Moment #4).
While there were several moments of sheer, unbridled lunacy throughout (Pat Buchanan calls Michael Schiavo and his supporters Nazis! Tom DeLay issues threats against judges who don't rule how he wants them to! Peggy Noonan calls Michael Schiavo supporters part of "culture of death!"), the craziest by far was then-Senator Bill Frist's declaration that Terri had been misdiagnosed after he spent an hour watching a video of her in his office.
5: Bush and Condi's Excellent Gaza Adventure
The Bush administration can be described as a slapstick comedy with an unusually high body count: Picture the Three Stooges and the Keystone Cops duking it out with cruise missiles.
There is no better example of this than Bush and the State Department's wild adventures in the Gaza Strip in 2006. As Vanity Fair's David Rose reported earlier this year, the trouble began when Bush started stamping his feet and throwing a hissy fit about having elections in the Palestinian territories. Essentially, Bush's desire to be seen as a "freedom president" meant forcing various swarthy third-worlders to vote in elections that would presumably result in U.S.-friendly regimes around the world. After Hamas predictably defeated Fatah in the elections, Bush decided he didn't like democracy in the Middle East so much after all, and he had Condi Rice tell Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas that "America expected him to dissolve the Haniyeh government as soon as possible and hold fresh elections." Apparently, Condi believed that having an American-backed leader dissolve a democratically elected government would warm the Palestinians' hearts to American aims. Long story short: The U.S. government decides to bolster Fatah by sending them a bunch of arms. Word of these shipments leaks to a Jordanian newspaper. All hell breaks loose; Hamas defeats Fatah and proceeds to use the American-supplied arms it confiscated from Fatah against Israel. The entire ordeal was an amazing illustration of the administration's complete inability to anticipate entirely predictable outcomes. Or as Khalid Jaberi, a commander with Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, put it: "Since the takeover, we've been trying to enter the brains of Bush and Rice, to figure out their mentality. We can only conclude that having Hamas in control serves their overall strategy, because their policy was so crazy otherwise."
Epic, epic fail.
4: "Brownie, You're Doing a Heckuva Job"

Yes, we're getting into Bush's real crowning achievements here. The Think Progress blog has done an admirable job of chronicling the entire affair, so I'm just going to summarize the lowlights from its timeline:
Aug. 29: Katrina makes landfall, then-FEMA chief Michael "Brownie" Brown warns Bush that the levees could overflow, Bush gives John McCain a cake. Brown, a Bush hack who had previously worked as "the chief rules enforcer of the Arabian Horse Association," also preemptively asks Cindy Taylor, FEMA's deputy director of public affairs, if he "can quit now." He also declares himself "a fashion god."
Aug. 30: Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff learns that the New Orleans levees had failed, looters run rampant in New Orleans, Bush plays guitar, then-White House spokesman Scott McClellan says that Bush will return to his Texas ranch for one more night of vacation before returning to Washington.
Aug. 31: Federal relief workers try to evacuate New Orleans residents in what Chertoff describes as "conditions of urban warfare."
Sept. 1: Bush says, "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees." Brownie says he's received "no reports of unrest."
Sept. 2: Karl Rove begins to enact his strategy of blaming local officials for the Katrina disaster, Bush tells Brownie that he's doing "a heckuva job" and also says he's "satisfied with the response" of the federal government but "not satisfied with all the results," and pledges to rebuild Trent Lott's house.
Sept. 4: Chertoff says that "government planners did not predict such a disaster ever could occur."
And so on. While watching Katrina unfold live on my television, I suddenly had the urge to sell all my belongings, purchase several firearms, move out to a remote cabin in Montana and wait for society to fall apart. Because hey: If the entire world was going to completely collapse around me, I might as well have a wise-cracking psychic dog to keep me company.
3: Abu Ghraib

In its May 10, 2004, issue, the New Yorker magazine published an explosive report by renowned investigative journalist Seymour Hersh detailing the systematic torture of prisoners by U.S. military personnel at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Administration apologists used two distinctly different strategies to push back against the inevitable bad press that ensued: One was to condemn the guilty parties but refer to them merely as "a few bad apples" who weren't reflective of American policy; the other was to dismiss the entire scandal as "an out-of-control fraternity prank."
But it turned out, of course, that the crimes committed at Abu Ghraib weren't merely the work of a few rogue soldiers. Indeed, it turns out that the tactics employed in the infamous Iraqi dungeon were first taken out for a test spin at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. And what tactics did those include, you ask? Why, sleep deprivation, stress positions, sexual humiliation and a technique called waterboarding that is meant to simulate the experience of drowning. And where did they get the idea to use these techniques? Why, from senior Bush administration officials, of course! With the full approval of Bush himself! As ABC News reported earlier this year, "the high-level discussions about these 'enhanced interrogation techniques' were so detailed, these sources said, some of the interrogation sessions were almost choreographed."
Amazingly, the Bush administration tried to justify its decisions by claiming that waterboarding was perfectly legal and did not constitute torture. Despite the fact that, you know, it was deemed illegal 40 years ago by U.S. generals in Vietnam.
This particular scandal was so bad that even the John Birch Society (!!!) concluded that the administration and its flunkies were war criminals.
2: 9/11

The terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2001, was one of the most terrifying and traumatic moments in American history. Thousands of people perished that day, all due to an evil act carried out by a group of religious fanatics who crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field near Shanksville, Penn. But while the loss of life on that day was indeed a major tragedy for all Americans, what happened afterward was in many ways more disturbing: In essence, the politicization of 9/11 caused us to lose our collective minds for a long period of time.
The first shot was fired by Karl Rove in a January 2002 address to the Republican National Committee in which he implored the GOP to "go to the country on (the War on Terror) because they trust the Republican Party to do a better job of protecting and strengthening America's military might and thereby protecting America." And sure enough, by the time the midterm elections rolled around, Bush and his GOP minions were milking 9/11 to get as many votes as they could. When Senate Democrats tried to extend union rights for workers in the newly created Department of Homeland Security, for instance, Bush issued a pissy veto threat, and then-spokesman Ari Fleischer described the Dems' proposal as "a step backward, not forward, in protecting the country."
And that's just a mild example. Here are some other choice GOP attacks that accused Democrats of helping al Qaeda win by not kissing Bush's ass with the sufficient level of enthusiasm:
"America sits and wonders why it is that al Qaeda, this ragtag bunch of terrorists scattered all over the globe, can reorganize themselves. I think the difference is that al Qaeda doesn't have a Senate. Al Qaeda doesn't have a Senator Daschle." -- Dick Armey
"As America faces terrorists and extremist dictators, Max Cleland runs television ads claiming he has the courage to lead. He says he supports President Bush at every opportunity, but that's not the truth. Since July, Max Cleland voted against President Bush's vital homeland security efforts 11 times." -- An attack ad targeting then-U.S. Senator Max Cleland. Cleland is a vet who lost both legs and an arm in the Vietnam War.
"Al Qaeda terrorists. Saddam Hussein. Enemies of America. Working to obtain nuclear weapons. Now more than ever our nation must have a missile defense system to shoot down missiles fired at America. Yet Tim Johnson has voted against a missile defense system 29 different times." -- An attack ad targeting Sen. Tim Johnson. This one was particularly rich, since a missile defense shield would have done precisely nothing to stop the 9/11 attacks.
"How dare Senator Daschle criticize President Bush while we are fighting our war on terrorism, especially when we have troops in the field?" -- Trent Lott, who freaked out because then-Senate majority leader Tom Daschle had the gall to suggest that we'd have to capture Osama bin Laden in order to consider the war on terror successful.
"(Daschle's) divisive comments have the effect of giving aid and comfort to our enemies by allowing them to exploit divisions in our country." -- Virginia Representative Tom Davis, also attacking Daschle's remarks. Who knew that demanding the capture of our enemies was tantamount to treason?
And so on. The Republicans' "The Democrats Want to Help al Qaeda Kill You" gambit worked for two consecutive elections before finally running out of gas in 2006. But even so, the ability of one political party to garner votes simply by yelling about treason incessantly is incredibly depressing.
Pass me that bucket of Freedom Fries, will you?
1: "Mission Accomplished"

A lot has been written about Bush's aircraft carrier stunt over the past few years, and with good reason. After all, no other incident better illustrates how Bush's presidency was built entirely on hubristic arrogance, shameless propaganda and a destructive disregard for reality. In what Noam Chomsky correctly called "the opening of the year 2004 election campaign," George W. Bush delivered a so-called "victory speech" for the Iraq War after landing on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln aboard an S-3B Viking jet dressed in full flyboy gear.
Bush's posturing as a war hero was, of course, laughable. During the Vietnam War, Bush used his family connections to obtain a gentleman draft dodger's assignment flying planes in Alabama for the Air National Guard -- a cushy assignment that he didn't even do very well. But no matter! As long as he gave off an aura of steely resolve, and as long as he wore a ridiculous outfit to emphasize his "manly characteristic," our ever-watchful pundit corps endlessly praised him as the gin-you-wine article.
A sample of the atrocities, painstakingly compiled by Media Matters:
"(T)hat's the president looking very much like a jet, you know, a high-flying jet star. A guy who is a jet pilot. Has been in the past when he was younger, obviously. What does that image mean to the American people, a guy who can actually get into a supersonic plane and actually fly in an unpressurized cabin like an actual jet pilot?" -- Chris Matthews
"A little bit of history and a lot of drama today when President Bush became the first commander in chief to make a tail-hook landing on an aircraft carrier. A one-time Fighter Dog himself in the Air National Guard, the president flew in the co-pilot seat with a trip to the USS Abraham Lincoln." -- Wolf Blitzer
"And two immutable truths about the president that the Democrats can't change: He's a youthful guy. He looked terrific and full of energy in a flight suit. He is a former pilot, so it's not a foreign art farm -- art form to him. Not all presidents could have pulled this scene off today." -- Brian Williams
And in the time since Bush performed this grotesque PR stunt, roughly 4,000 troops have been killed in action along with tens of thousands of Iraqis, with nary a WMD in sight to justify the carnage. Heck of a job, all around.
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2008 headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 1, 2008 1:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Along those lines, my only criticism is that #10 should be #1.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You said it and the photo captures it. That swaggering, junk-displaying posturer isn't fit to. . .
Posted by: Beck
» RE: You said it and the photo captures it. That swaggering, junk-displaying posturer isn't fit to. . .
Posted by: mainspark
» RE: You said it and the photo captures it. That swaggering, junk-displaying posturer isn't fit to. . .
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: Nice.
Posted by: Brandon
» I'm Green Party.......
Posted by: Beepath
» Naderites spew class, racial and gender hatred, do not vote for them!
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» RE: Naderites spew class, racial and gender hatred, do not vote for them!
Posted by: Quannah
» Fascinating, if you oppose division you are immediately dubbed a racist or sexist or both
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» #1: COMPLICITY IN 9/11... BUSH IN THE CLASSROOM
Posted by: Zeitgeist
» ALL AMERICANS MISS N0. 1 CRIME: THE SUPPORT OF ISRAEL
Posted by: pierrot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on Jul 1, 2008 1:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After years of willful mismanglement of the United States, the American public finally gets a clue and elects Democrats to a majority in both houses of the US Congress.
Despite the public's expectation that Congress will start to set things right and that the Bush administration would finally be shown some justice for what it has done, newly appointed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California immediately declares that "impeachment is off the table".
This is actually a sign that the Democrats, while making a lot of political noise, are actually on Bush's side, and on most of the major issues of the day are as fully supportive of the President as the Republican Congress was.
Congress goes on to keep the Iraq war fully funded with no limits whatsoever, cave on FISA, and conduct lots of weak investigations that go nowhere but provide a not very entertaining political Kabuki show.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Number 11
Posted by: Tom Degan
» lol.. get real
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Number 11
Posted by: raccoon65
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jreal on Jul 1, 2008 2:47 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These Democrats are completely incompetent and Nancy Pee(on her constituants)losi needs to be kicked out herself!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry, this was supposed to go under Number 11
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 1, 2008 3:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In November of 2000, when the voters of the United States of America foolishly sent this moron to the executive mansion, we effectively pointed the proverbial loaded pistol at our own collective head. Four years later, on Election Day 2004 - make no mistake about it - we pulled the trigger."
Did you ever think that your country would sink this low? Ouch!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:People of the USA, don't elude your responsibility
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: People of the USA, don't elude your responsibility
Posted by: sirios
» RE: People of the USA, don't elude your responsibility
Posted by: Ederlore
» I don't think he was re-elected . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: I don't think he was re-elected . . .
Posted by: nikolai
» He wasn't.
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: He wasn't.
Posted by: robert.noll
» RE: He wasn't.
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: I don't think he was re-elected. Course not! It's the code...folks!
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Jul 1, 2008 3:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'soup /b/
also, fantastic list. i'm printing these and distributing flyers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: PIC FAIL. "Freedomizing" is also great.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: PIC FAIL. "Freedomizing" is also great.
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 1, 2008 3:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon and heal or stay stuck in the Lie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: williameon on Jul 1, 2008 3:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they could steal 2000 Selection what's going to stop them from stealing
2008?
It is tragic.
Add your own:
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: #12 FLOOD Midwest, #13 Oil Prices #14 Iran War #15 2008 Selection, #16 2009 DEPRESSION
Posted by: mnstra
» RE: Stealing next "election"
Posted by: editnetwork
» RE: Stealing next "election". Too easy!
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 1, 2008 3:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The German asparagus are fabulous."
"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions."
"One of the things important about history is to remember the true history."
"I'll be long gone before some smart person ever figures out what happened inside this Oval Office."
And one quote for the Obama fans:
"Let me start off by saying that in 2000 I said, 'Vote for me. I'm an agent of change.' In 2004, I said, 'I'm not interested in change --I want to continue as president.' Every candidate has got to say 'change.' That's what the American people expect."
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» LOL
Posted by: Ryan
» LOL
Posted by: Ryan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Jul 1, 2008 5:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Keep Dreaming
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Keep Dreaming
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: Keep Dreaming
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Keep Dreaming
Posted by: Crazy H
» This is going to go on your permanent record young man!
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Permanent Documentation
Posted by: US Citizen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jul 1, 2008 6:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, much the 'Murkin voting public was still bamboozled by the Decidinator, but "we" did not elect him. The Republican-controlled paperless voting machines, the long lines of voters waiting for hours and hours in predominantly Democratic districts due to too few machines (while those in wealthy areas had plenty of voting machines), miscounts, lost votes, purging of voter lists, intimidation, and even misinformation sent to Democrats telling them their day to vote had been changed all contributed to a very, very questionable result.
I do get kind of tired of reading and hearing about how foolish "we" all were to "re-elect" Bush, when this notion is, at best, in contention. It's like saying "we" allowed the invasion of Iraq when so many of us marched in protest, wrote letters to congress and the newspapers, and tried to spread the word about how wrong it was.
Having said all that, I find it quite admirable and even amazing that anyone could sort through the myriad of atrocities perpetuated by the Bush administration and come up with such a lucid, all-encompasing assessment of its failures.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You had a 3 LeeAnn but I gave you a well-deserved 5
Posted by: Suzon
» Thank you!
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: I agree!
Posted by: badkitty
» RE: I agree!
Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: I agree! What?
Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Great Article
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Artkansas on Jul 1, 2008 6:46 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 1, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I ADMIRE THE OPTIMISM
Posted by: sweetgirl2
» Keyboard Commandoes
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Keyboard Commandoes I ALREADY HAVE, THANK YOU
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I ADMIRE THE OPTIMISM
Posted by: mkruege
» RE: I ADMIRE THE OPTIMISM - don't worry Obama will continue the policy
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jul 1, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sweetgirl2 on Jul 1, 2008 7:06 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, they're just pathetic and horribly sad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: bush's worst
Posted by: US Citizen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 1, 2008 7:51 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAPPY NOW ?!?!?
VOTENADER.ORG !!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MORE BAD NEWS: OBAMA TO EXPAND BUSH'S DISGUSTING FAITH BASED BULLSHIT !!!!
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: MORE BAD NEWS: OBAMA TO EXPAND BUSH'S DISGUSTING FAITH BASED BULLSHIT !!!!
Posted by: maxpayne
» Don't forget the Supreme Court appointments . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Obama went out of his way to condemn the liberal justices over death penalty
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Jul 1, 2008 8:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Similarly, if the people of a country knowingly adopt a lifestyle that is dependent upon massive imports from unstable, undemocratic parts of the world, they will end up with a country that is dominated by a military-industrial complex that will use the people's dependence as an excuse to accumulate the power required to ensure a secure supply. It's a certainty. It was predicted more than thirty years ago and came to pass exactly as predicted. We watched it happen and did nothing to stop it.
Now we whine because they know they own us and therefore can't be bothered to offer serious candidates for public office. What do you expect?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Americans get the government they deserve
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» Yes. There are exceptions
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» A well-reasoned reply
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kellysgarden on Jul 1, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: kellysgarden
» "They" could be . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: "They" could be . . .
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: EncinoM
» You are assuming . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» This post doesn't have your usual bad spelling . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: This post doesn't have your usual bad spelling . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: nikolai
» We also need to know . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: We also need to know . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» Show us where Sibel Edmonds supports . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Show us where Sibel Edmonds supports . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» So you made that up . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» Your bad spelling and grammar have resurfaced . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Your bad spelling and grammar have resurfaced . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: We also need to know . . .
Posted by: cacky
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsound on Jul 1, 2008 8:10 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just keep asking yourself what would have happened if Gore or Kerry had been responsible for just ONE while in office.
Americans are slow learners with short memories.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: not over yet . . .
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: not over yet . . .
Posted by: EinMD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on Jul 1, 2008 8:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WHAT KILLS ME IS
Posted by: EinMD
» Dubai
Posted by: purplewarrior
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 1, 2008 8:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shortly after the mission began, the Ace of Spades, suspecting he had been betrayed by someone on his staff, slipped out of the al-Sa’ah restaurant’s backdoor and fled the scene. Ten minutes later, four 2,000-pound bunker busters dropped by the diverted bomber blew the suburban eatery to bits along with cooks, waiters, bus boys, customers, cashier, pedestrians passing by and the occupants of three nearby homes.
Fourteen civilians died in that Baghdad neighborhood on April 7, people who lost their lives simply for being there, including two young children. Yet back in the United States, few Americans protested the barbaric aspect of the B1 mission, not on TV or in the press anyway. Quite the contrary, there was glorification of Bush’s decision to “take out Saddam,” as so many in his administration enjoyed saying. Well, that’s not how I felt.
Because I know something about the misery of warfare, the B1 mission horrified me. I was also outraged at Bush for allowing such an atrocity to happen. When a president of the United States decides to preemptively strike another country for the first time in American history with massive air power, then, by God, he had better get it right. And that doesn’t mean killing innocent human beings because he has a grudge against their leader.
Republicans will retort, “We killed millions of civilians in World War Two, thousands at a time.” True, but there’s a difference. A humungous one. We didn’t start the hostilities. Germany and Japan did.
The president claims to be a born-again Christian who got a second chance at life when he turned 40. If that’s the case and not just hypocritical bullshit for public consumption, then he’d better get down on his knees and beg forgiveness from Jesus for killing those poor people on April 7. Because if George W. doesn’t show contrition, which I haven’t seen or heard expressed so far, he may end up in the eternal down-under sharing a table with Saddam and his sons in a barbecue joint called “Hell.”
To excuse our cowboy commander-in-chief, Republicans will argue he didn’t give orders to the B1 crew; someone else did. But that reason won’t wash, either. As our nation’s top military leader who authorized the decapitation strike, he has blood on his hands just like Osama bin Laden.
Here’s the nexus in a nutshell. For the loved ones of 9/11 victims, it’s heart-wrenching to hear but must be said. If you believe as I do that human lives are precious, especially those of children who deserve an opportunity to grow up and have kids of their own, then we must face the truth no matter how painful. Other than motivation, the only difference between a B1 dropping bombs on a civilian restaurant from 30,000 feet and someone flying a jetliner into an office building is the number of people that die.
As an addendum to this tawdry tale, in 2004 I watched George W. on CNN. He was in the Oval Office answering questions about a retaliatory air assault against Syria by Israeli jets. The reason for the revenge mission was a Hamas suicide bombing of a crowded Jewish eating establishment that killed 20 people.
When asked by a White House reporter if the Israeli raid was justified, Bush glowered and replied sternly, “When Hamas blows up a restaurant with civilians inside, that’s terrorism.”
I kid you not. I heard him say that with my own ears. Those were the exact words spoken by George bin Laden.
From the book, George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, by
Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, registered Republican and Obama supporter
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Number 11: Bush's bloodthirsty attempt to kill Saddam Hussein
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bh on Jul 1, 2008 8:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EinMD on Jul 1, 2008 8:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Clinton got a hummer!
Al Gore is fat and preachy!
John Kerry shot himself!
Liberals are all traitors!
Why do you hate the troops!
Smoking gun? Mushroom cloud??
Freedom Toast! Freedom Toast! Braaaaaawk!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Still laughing
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daybedoe on Jul 1, 2008 9:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Was he wrong?
Posted by: kellysgarden
» Bush selected Cheney . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Bush selected Cheney . . .
Posted by: daybedoe
» RE: Was he wrong?
Posted by: daybedoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: smendler on Jul 1, 2008 9:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Send your ideas --
The Bush Regime Memorial Society
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Time for a proper monument
Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: Time for a proper monument
Posted by: isnamthere
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jefferybelton on Jul 1, 2008 10:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: jefferybelton
Posted by: annavan1
» RE: jefferybelton
Posted by: jefferybelton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robchapman on Jul 1, 2008 10:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the people that Bush keeps telling us know what is going on there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 1, 2008 10:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She was actively engaged in keeping WMD's out of the hands of terrorists. By outing her, Bush committed an act of treason in a time of war. "Aiding and Abetting the enemy" I believe it's called, and there is a traditional response involving a long rope and a short fall.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: As requested by the author...
Posted by: tap17x
» RE: As requested by the author...
Posted by: nikolai
» The WAR ON TERROR is a friekin fraud
Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: The WAR ON TERROR is a friekin fraud
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: D. Shenary on Jul 1, 2008 10:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chuckjs on Jul 1, 2008 11:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So it's time for one of you Americans to grow a nice set of Kahunas like Lech had and start the change yourself. No stinking lying politician, including Obama the evangelical, will do it for you. They are too comfortable with the power you have granted them.
I would be glad to do it but, I am not an American citizen and I have my own problems putting my country's Mini-Bush in his place.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Time for a lot of people to get off their tushies.
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ldyradr on Jul 1, 2008 11:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: King Bush
Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: King Bush
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tap17x on Jul 1, 2008 11:26 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jul 1, 2008 12:40 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And we are going to fix all this in November by selecting Bush-Clinton-Reagan hybrid Obama?
Posted by: cacky
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fifthworld on Jul 1, 2008 12:48 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about "atrocious", "despicable" or the like -- my point being, if you're to look intelligent in the face of such dopy evil, brushing up on the language and not soft-balling it would be an awesome idea. Meanwhile, HAVE A GREAT DAY!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oops, mea culpa
Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: Wait a minute
Posted by: sawdust
» Well okay
Posted by: fifthworld
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jul 1, 2008 1:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone that had an "engaged capable of a rational thought" brain didn't vote for this yahoo.
And while I realize there just isn't enough space you could have added the accomplices in Congress, "political pundits", and the reactionary right wingers that insisted that this man had/has a hold of reality!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CharAnn on Jul 1, 2008 1:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Char
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnJlws on Jul 1, 2008 1:28 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the meantime there's an election going on that could change the direction of not only our country, but our world, but rather than focus on Bush's clone, let's all focus on the last eight years of this debacle and let’s concentrate real hard on things that matter like “Obama’s tacking to the left.”
And where in this list is "he stole the election?" I can't believe it didn't make the list, or maybe it did and I was so engrossed I missed it. And "he stole the election" started this unparalleled, epic journey of stupidity. “He stole the election” is yet another great thing to expend time and space on and continue to talk about because...because...because...talking about “he stole the election” would make such a difference.
A lot like this very long article.
Sorry, this one wasn't worth reading, although it was sadly humorous in spots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xcellent Use of Time
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Solar Wind on Jul 1, 2008 1:29 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daniel w vermillion on Jul 1, 2008 1:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jul 1, 2008 1:45 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's still got 202 days to completely destroy America and start WWIII..!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on Jul 1, 2008 1:53 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But at least you have enough common sense to realize we actually have three branches of government.
Oh, by the way, which one of those branches has the responsibility of declaring war? You did mention the "Iraqi War" didn't you?
You managed to show your ignorance in many ways with your article. Maybe our troops (yes, over 4000 at last count) have not died in vain: They have helped continue to give hateful people such as yourself the freedom to speak your mind.
God bless our country, its' leaders, and more specifically our troops.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: debmcd
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: beautifulady2003
» THIS SITE HAS BEEN HACked!!!
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: THIS SITE HAS BEEN HACked!!!
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
» I suspect . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: JGug1
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: Dak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: debmcd on Jul 1, 2008 2:03 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snideelf on Jul 1, 2008 2:17 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 1, 2008 2:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 1, 2008 2:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BA
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 1, 2008 3:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ba
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Jul 1, 2008 3:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marjani on Jul 1, 2008 3:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That's what you get in crackerjacks
Posted by: Moira61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rondolce on Jul 1, 2008 9:42 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Forgot?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pana on Jul 2, 2008 1:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you George Bush for being the UN-education president. We have had dumb presidents, but egads, George W. has to be the winner in this department and also the most evil one as well. Our nation is definitely at risk, ask the young people. They know, they are the victims.
Bush should have just stayed at home, dressed up, and played with his toys.
I can't believe the popular vote was against him and yet he became president for two terms. This is how broken the system is, and how evil and out of touch the politicos are. They don't care one hoot about the common person, plus they get the best perks, the best health care, and the best retirement while we suckers have to pay their way for the rest of our lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james_allen on Jul 2, 2008 1:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://fabpedigree.com/politic.htm
James
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FMABBI on Jul 2, 2008 2:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1.) First of all, we didn't elect Bush either time since both elections were stolen. We need a better system of voting. (Duh!) Why is this so hard?
2.) How can so few do so much damage? Where was Congress? Sadly, the Congress is an institution that has been purchased by BIG MONEY - much of it invested in the military industrial complex. If we can take BIG MONEY out of the political process, maybe we'll have politicians who actually represent the people who vote for them. We the citizens DEPEND on them to represent US (and not the corporations who fund their campaigns)!
3.) Amazingly, the events of 9-11 have yet to be investigated! Come on PEOPLE - are you really buying the "official story"? The 9-11 Commission funding of only $6m to investigate ($40m was spent to investigate "Whitewater"), two years after the fact and only because of the victims families' pressure - with the conclusions already accepted as "truth" - does NOT constitute a real investigation by any stretch of the imagination! Where did all the evidence go? Who benefited financially? What ABOUT Building Seven? Google "9-11 truth". This atrocity of the never ending "War on Terror" hinges on "9-11" so come on people, DEMAND a real investigation, properly funded, independent of politics. Don't you think that would be taxpayer money WELL SPENT??
4.) We need an educated electorate. The vast majority of voters do not know the basics of how our government is supposed to work. How many know and understand the Constitution/ Bill of Rights? Because of our collective lack of basic knowledge, we vote folks into office based on personality/ image. BIG MONEY buys ads and we the voters are so unaware that we believe anything the ad says. We need a much better informed citizenry and it starts with our public education K-12.
5.) The major news media outlets are complicit in all of the above. How do we fix? I do not know - but we need to put our heads together to figure this out. Our future freedom depends on it!
So you can't really blame the ignorant, lazy, fat, and spoiled American people - it's almost like we're nurtured from the beginning of life to be this way by our (purchased) government. Read 1984 again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thank you, FMABBI!
Posted by: DJC
Comments are closed-
Posted by: packofwolves on Jul 2, 2008 5:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marshallstax on Jul 2, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One (major) caveat: I'm working my way through a book called "Twilight War - The Folly of U.S. Space Dominance" by Mike Moore, which goes through the history of space exploration/exploitation and details the growing movement toward militarizing space - way beyond "Space Wars" - and serves as a decent backgrounder for anyone wanting to be informed about how the "space warriors" are trying to push NASA, and the Air Force, into a very different space program.
I absolutely do not support the militarization of space... that it's inevitable for war to move to space seems almost certain now and that's sad, but not really surprizing, given how all other horizions eventually get militarized. So, it's with mixed feelings that I have to grudgingly accept that still-president Bush gave that speech expressing support for continued exploration of space.
NASA needs better funding to operate... but it also needs the public to check in and stay on top of exactly what direction this country is going in space. People need to work to support the peaceful use of space and oppose space militarization.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Space not a waste...
Posted by: Dboy
» We need to fix what's wrong here first.
Posted by: DJC
» RE: We need to fix what's wrong here first.
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: well said
Posted by: Ghoulman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Musked on Jul 2, 2008 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have blackmail pictures of Pelosi in odd situations with little gremlins or little girls. Same with Harry Reid, he tap dances with Wide Stance Larry Craig in the John and they have proof. Only reason that can come to mind that someone as stupid as old wide eyes "deer in headlights" Pelosi would take impeachment "off the table" is that she snorts coke off the bellies of children and they have pictures of the act. She and Harry are traitors and in bed with the AIPAC, PNAC and Neocon triators. There is no reason for their inaction to bring justice to the guilty and punish those responsible for ruining this country. Why why why?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Yam on Jul 2, 2008 10:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/main.htm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Musked on Jul 2, 2008 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metasailor on Jul 2, 2008 12:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has the quadrafecta: Bush lied to the US, Bush lied to his own party, the Bush administration threatened to fire an employee if he told Congress the truth, and the eventual cost is over a trillion.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unrelatedwaffle on Jul 2, 2008 1:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As though the poor in America's school system wasn't lousy enough to begin with.
This place is farked. I'm catching the next boat out before the whole building comes crashing down.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Jul 2, 2008 9:00 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Many of my friends are Republicans
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willd4change on Jul 3, 2008 6:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mercury613 on Jul 3, 2008 1:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jawsouth on Jul 4, 2008 9:21 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is simple, no matter what party affiliation you have and even if you like your representatives vote against all incumbents!!!!
Maybe then we would not have career politicians and the ones we elect might actually try to do something constructive for their alotted time in office. It would take out the good ol boy network and lessen the special interests groups impact. In fact we might find that spending millions of $$ to campaign won't make as much sense when they know re-election is not a possibility. It would sure make going to the polls easy and the guesswork out of marking your ballot. Let's face it, we all know that in our current situation that term limits will never be passed, so lets just do it ourselves. Unite against all incumbents!!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nopuppy on Jul 4, 2008 10:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joseph_b26 on Jul 5, 2008 1:27 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The power players running this war have a lot of nerve. We had the nerve to kill Iraq’s leader for genocide crimes that Saddam Hussein would also call a necessary evil. Almost on a daily bases, we have to get up and paint a new face of denial to hold back the Iraqi outrage, the world outrage and the American outrage for what we know is genocide. Yes, this lie requires daily maintenance, for without it, George Bush would be held for the same crimes he charged Saddam Hussein for.
A lie of this magnitude requires maintenance to keep it afloat. Condoleezza Rice is doing her part to make this terrible crime okay. No doubt, her conscience demands the same daily maintenance; she does not want to wake up to what she has supported. Would you?
Joseph
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlohaTerry on Jul 5, 2008 7:53 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The evidence was hastily melted down and destroyed, but as anyone can see, those Buildings were brought down by steel-cutting Thermite Charges!
The plan was called the Project for a New American Century...PNAC!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bright Penny on Jul 6, 2008 11:40 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 6, 2008 3:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress does NOT have the authority to second-guess this, nor does it have oversight. By subpeoning Gonzales to testify, Congress was doing an abuse of power.
Also, Abu Graib should have been number one, easily.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenPuker on Jul 8, 2008 1:37 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://freedocumentaries.org/
theatre.php?filmid=234&id=1157&wh=1000x720
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 1, 2008 1:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Along those lines, my only criticism is that #10 should be #1.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You said it and the photo captures it. That swaggering, junk-displaying posturer isn't fit to. . .
Posted by: Beck
» RE: You said it and the photo captures it. That swaggering, junk-displaying posturer isn't fit to. . .
Posted by: mainspark
» RE: You said it and the photo captures it. That swaggering, junk-displaying posturer isn't fit to. . .
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: Nice.
Posted by: Brandon
» I'm Green Party.......
Posted by: Beepath
» Naderites spew class, racial and gender hatred, do not vote for them!
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» RE: Naderites spew class, racial and gender hatred, do not vote for them!
Posted by: Quannah
» Fascinating, if you oppose division you are immediately dubbed a racist or sexist or both
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist
» #1: COMPLICITY IN 9/11... BUSH IN THE CLASSROOM
Posted by: Zeitgeist
» ALL AMERICANS MISS N0. 1 CRIME: THE SUPPORT OF ISRAEL
Posted by: pierrot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on Jul 1, 2008 1:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After years of willful mismanglement of the United States, the American public finally gets a clue and elects Democrats to a majority in both houses of the US Congress.
Despite the public's expectation that Congress will start to set things right and that the Bush administration would finally be shown some justice for what it has done, newly appointed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California immediately declares that "impeachment is off the table".
This is actually a sign that the Democrats, while making a lot of political noise, are actually on Bush's side, and on most of the major issues of the day are as fully supportive of the President as the Republican Congress was.
Congress goes on to keep the Iraq war fully funded with no limits whatsoever, cave on FISA, and conduct lots of weak investigations that go nowhere but provide a not very entertaining political Kabuki show.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Number 11
Posted by: Tom Degan
» lol.. get real
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Number 11
Posted by: raccoon65
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jreal on Jul 1, 2008 2:47 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These Democrats are completely incompetent and Nancy Pee(on her constituants)losi needs to be kicked out herself!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry, this was supposed to go under Number 11
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 1, 2008 3:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In November of 2000, when the voters of the United States of America foolishly sent this moron to the executive mansion, we effectively pointed the proverbial loaded pistol at our own collective head. Four years later, on Election Day 2004 - make no mistake about it - we pulled the trigger."
Did you ever think that your country would sink this low? Ouch!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:People of the USA, don't elude your responsibility
Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: People of the USA, don't elude your responsibility
Posted by: sirios
» RE: People of the USA, don't elude your responsibility
Posted by: Ederlore
» I don't think he was re-elected . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: I don't think he was re-elected . . .
Posted by: nikolai
» He wasn't.
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: He wasn't.
Posted by: robert.noll
» RE: He wasn't.
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: I don't think he was re-elected. Course not! It's the code...folks!
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Jul 1, 2008 3:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'soup /b/
also, fantastic list. i'm printing these and distributing flyers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: PIC FAIL. "Freedomizing" is also great.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: PIC FAIL. "Freedomizing" is also great.
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 1, 2008 3:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon and heal or stay stuck in the Lie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: williameon on Jul 1, 2008 3:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they could steal 2000 Selection what's going to stop them from stealing
2008?
It is tragic.
Add your own:
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: #12 FLOOD Midwest, #13 Oil Prices #14 Iran War #15 2008 Selection, #16 2009 DEPRESSION
Posted by: mnstra
» RE: Stealing next "election"
Posted by: editnetwork
» RE: Stealing next "election". Too easy!
Posted by: greenPuker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 1, 2008 3:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The German asparagus are fabulous."
"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions."
"One of the things important about history is to remember the true history."
"I'll be long gone before some smart person ever figures out what happened inside this Oval Office."
And one quote for the Obama fans:
"Let me start off by saying that in 2000 I said, 'Vote for me. I'm an agent of change.' In 2004, I said, 'I'm not interested in change --I want to continue as president.' Every candidate has got to say 'change.' That's what the American people expect."
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» LOL
Posted by: Ryan
» LOL
Posted by: Ryan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Jul 1, 2008 5:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Keep Dreaming
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Keep Dreaming
Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: Keep Dreaming
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Keep Dreaming
Posted by: Crazy H
» This is going to go on your permanent record young man!
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Permanent Documentation
Posted by: US Citizen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jul 1, 2008 6:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, much the 'Murkin voting public was still bamboozled by the Decidinator, but "we" did not elect him. The Republican-controlled paperless voting machines, the long lines of voters waiting for hours and hours in predominantly Democratic districts due to too few machines (while those in wealthy areas had plenty of voting machines), miscounts, lost votes, purging of voter lists, intimidation, and even misinformation sent to Democrats telling them their day to vote had been changed all contributed to a very, very questionable result.
I do get kind of tired of reading and hearing about how foolish "we" all were to "re-elect" Bush, when this notion is, at best, in contention. It's like saying "we" allowed the invasion of Iraq when so many of us marched in protest, wrote letters to congress and the newspapers, and tried to spread the word about how wrong it was.
Having said all that, I find it quite admirable and even amazing that anyone could sort through the myriad of atrocities perpetuated by the Bush administration and come up with such a lucid, all-encompasing assessment of its failures.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You had a 3 LeeAnn but I gave you a well-deserved 5
Posted by: Suzon
» Thank you!
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: I agree!
Posted by: badkitty
» RE: I agree!
Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: I agree! What?
Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Great Article
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Artkansas on Jul 1, 2008 6:46 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 1, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I ADMIRE THE OPTIMISM
Posted by: sweetgirl2
» Keyboard Commandoes
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Keyboard Commandoes I ALREADY HAVE, THANK YOU
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I ADMIRE THE OPTIMISM
Posted by: mkruege
» RE: I ADMIRE THE OPTIMISM - don't worry Obama will continue the policy
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jul 1, 2008 7:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sweetgirl2 on Jul 1, 2008 7:06 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, they're just pathetic and horribly sad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: bush's worst
Posted by: US Citizen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 1, 2008 7:51 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAPPY NOW ?!?!?
VOTENADER.ORG !!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MORE BAD NEWS: OBAMA TO EXPAND BUSH'S DISGUSTING FAITH BASED BULLSHIT !!!!
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: MORE BAD NEWS: OBAMA TO EXPAND BUSH'S DISGUSTING FAITH BASED BULLSHIT !!!!
Posted by: maxpayne
» Don't forget the Supreme Court appointments . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Obama went out of his way to condemn the liberal justices over death penalty
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Jul 1, 2008 8:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Similarly, if the people of a country knowingly adopt a lifestyle that is dependent upon massive imports from unstable, undemocratic parts of the world, they will end up with a country that is dominated by a military-industrial complex that will use the people's dependence as an excuse to accumulate the power required to ensure a secure supply. It's a certainty. It was predicted more than thirty years ago and came to pass exactly as predicted. We watched it happen and did nothing to stop it.
Now we whine because they know they own us and therefore can't be bothered to offer serious candidates for public office. What do you expect?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Americans get the government they deserve
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» Yes. There are exceptions
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» A well-reasoned reply
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kellysgarden on Jul 1, 2008 8:08 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: kellysgarden
» "They" could be . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: "They" could be . . .
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: EncinoM
» You are assuming . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: You are assuming . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» This post doesn't have your usual bad spelling . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: This post doesn't have your usual bad spelling . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: I'm glad 9/11 made the list
Posted by: nikolai
» We also need to know . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: We also need to know . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: Speaking of sewers . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» Show us where Sibel Edmonds supports . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Show us where Sibel Edmonds supports . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» So you made that up . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» Your bad spelling and grammar have resurfaced . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Your bad spelling and grammar have resurfaced . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: So you made that up . . .
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: We also need to know . . .
Posted by: cacky
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsound on Jul 1, 2008 8:10 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just keep asking yourself what would have happened if Gore or Kerry had been responsible for just ONE while in office.
Americans are slow learners with short memories.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: not over yet . . .
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: not over yet . . .
Posted by: EinMD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on Jul 1, 2008 8:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WHAT KILLS ME IS
Posted by: EinMD
» Dubai
Posted by: purplewarrior
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 1, 2008 8:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shortly after the mission began, the Ace of Spades, suspecting he had been betrayed by someone on his staff, slipped out of the al-Sa’ah restaurant’s backdoor and fled the scene. Ten minutes later, four 2,000-pound bunker busters dropped by the diverted bomber blew the suburban eatery to bits along with cooks, waiters, bus boys, customers, cashier, pedestrians passing by and the occupants of three nearby homes.
Fourteen civilians died in that Baghdad neighborhood on April 7, people who lost their lives simply for being there, including two young children. Yet back in the United States, few Americans protested the barbaric aspect of the B1 mission, not on TV or in the press anyway. Quite the contrary, there was glorification of Bush’s decision to “take out Saddam,” as so many in his administration enjoyed saying. Well, that’s not how I felt.
Because I know something about the misery of warfare, the B1 mission horrified me. I was also outraged at Bush for allowing such an atrocity to happen. When a president of the United States decides to preemptively strike another country for the first time in American history with massive air power, then, by God, he had better get it right. And that doesn’t mean killing innocent human beings because he has a grudge against their leader.
Republicans will retort, “We killed millions of civilians in World War Two, thousands at a time.” True, but there’s a difference. A humungous one. We didn’t start the hostilities. Germany and Japan did.
The president claims to be a born-again Christian who got a second chance at life when he turned 40. If that’s the case and not just hypocritical bullshit for public consumption, then he’d better get down on his knees and beg forgiveness from Jesus for killing those poor people on April 7. Because if George W. doesn’t show contrition, which I haven’t seen or heard expressed so far, he may end up in the eternal down-under sharing a table with Saddam and his sons in a barbecue joint called “Hell.”
To excuse our cowboy commander-in-chief, Republicans will argue he didn’t give orders to the B1 crew; someone else did. But that reason won’t wash, either. As our nation’s top military leader who authorized the decapitation strike, he has blood on his hands just like Osama bin Laden.
Here’s the nexus in a nutshell. For the loved ones of 9/11 victims, it’s heart-wrenching to hear but must be said. If you believe as I do that human lives are precious, especially those of children who deserve an opportunity to grow up and have kids of their own, then we must face the truth no matter how painful. Other than motivation, the only difference between a B1 dropping bombs on a civilian restaurant from 30,000 feet and someone flying a jetliner into an office building is the number of people that die.
As an addendum to this tawdry tale, in 2004 I watched George W. on CNN. He was in the Oval Office answering questions about a retaliatory air assault against Syria by Israeli jets. The reason for the revenge mission was a Hamas suicide bombing of a crowded Jewish eating establishment that killed 20 people.
When asked by a White House reporter if the Israeli raid was justified, Bush glowered and replied sternly, “When Hamas blows up a restaurant with civilians inside, that’s terrorism.”
I kid you not. I heard him say that with my own ears. Those were the exact words spoken by George bin Laden.
From the book, George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, by
Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, registered Republican and Obama supporter
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Number 11: Bush's bloodthirsty attempt to kill Saddam Hussein
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bh on Jul 1, 2008 8:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EinMD on Jul 1, 2008 8:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Clinton got a hummer!
Al Gore is fat and preachy!
John Kerry shot himself!
Liberals are all traitors!
Why do you hate the troops!
Smoking gun? Mushroom cloud??
Freedom Toast! Freedom Toast! Braaaaaawk!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Still laughing
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daybedoe on Jul 1, 2008 9:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Was he wrong?
Posted by: kellysgarden
» Bush selected Cheney . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Bush selected Cheney . . .
Posted by: daybedoe
» RE: Was he wrong?
Posted by: daybedoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: smendler on Jul 1, 2008 9:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Send your ideas --
The Bush Regime Memorial Society
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Time for a proper monument
Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: Time for a proper monument
Posted by: isnamthere
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jefferybelton on Jul 1, 2008 10:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: jefferybelton
Posted by: annavan1
» RE: jefferybelton
Posted by: jefferybelton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robchapman on Jul 1, 2008 10:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the people that Bush keeps telling us know what is going on there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 1, 2008 10:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She was actively engaged in keeping WMD's out of the hands of terrorists. By outing her, Bush committed an act of treason in a time of war. "Aiding and Abetting the enemy" I believe it's called, and there is a traditional response involving a long rope and a short fall.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: As requested by the author...
Posted by: tap17x
» RE: As requested by the author...
Posted by: nikolai
» The WAR ON TERROR is a friekin fraud
Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: The WAR ON TERROR is a friekin fraud
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: D. Shenary on Jul 1, 2008 10:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chuckjs on Jul 1, 2008 11:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So it's time for one of you Americans to grow a nice set of Kahunas like Lech had and start the change yourself. No stinking lying politician, including Obama the evangelical, will do it for you. They are too comfortable with the power you have granted them.
I would be glad to do it but, I am not an American citizen and I have my own problems putting my country's Mini-Bush in his place.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Time for a lot of people to get off their tushies.
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ldyradr on Jul 1, 2008 11:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: King Bush
Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: King Bush
Posted by: annavan1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tap17x on Jul 1, 2008 11:26 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: Many of the comments posted here are very critical.
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jul 1, 2008 12:40 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And we are going to fix all this in November by selecting Bush-Clinton-Reagan hybrid Obama?
Posted by: cacky
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fifthworld on Jul 1, 2008 12:48 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about "atrocious", "despicable" or the like -- my point being, if you're to look intelligent in the face of such dopy evil, brushing up on the language and not soft-balling it would be an awesome idea. Meanwhile, HAVE A GREAT DAY!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oops, mea culpa
Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: Wait a minute
Posted by: sawdust
» Well okay
Posted by: fifthworld
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jul 1, 2008 1:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone that had an "engaged capable of a rational thought" brain didn't vote for this yahoo.
And while I realize there just isn't enough space you could have added the accomplices in Congress, "political pundits", and the reactionary right wingers that insisted that this man had/has a hold of reality!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CharAnn on Jul 1, 2008 1:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Char
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnJlws on Jul 1, 2008 1:28 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the meantime there's an election going on that could change the direction of not only our country, but our world, but rather than focus on Bush's clone, let's all focus on the last eight years of this debacle and let’s concentrate real hard on things that matter like “Obama’s tacking to the left.”
And where in this list is "he stole the election?" I can't believe it didn't make the list, or maybe it did and I was so engrossed I missed it. And "he stole the election" started this unparalleled, epic journey of stupidity. “He stole the election” is yet another great thing to expend time and space on and continue to talk about because...because...because...talking about “he stole the election” would make such a difference.
A lot like this very long article.
Sorry, this one wasn't worth reading, although it was sadly humorous in spots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xcellent Use of Time
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Solar Wind on Jul 1, 2008 1:29 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daniel w vermillion on Jul 1, 2008 1:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jul 1, 2008 1:45 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's still got 202 days to completely destroy America and start WWIII..!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on Jul 1, 2008 1:53 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But at least you have enough common sense to realize we actually have three branches of government.
Oh, by the way, which one of those branches has the responsibility of declaring war? You did mention the "Iraqi War" didn't you?
You managed to show your ignorance in many ways with your article. Maybe our troops (yes, over 4000 at last count) have not died in vain: They have helped continue to give hateful people such as yourself the freedom to speak your mind.
God bless our country, its' leaders, and more specifically our troops.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: debmcd
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: beautifulady2003
» THIS SITE HAS BEEN HACked!!!
Posted by: nikolai
» RE: THIS SITE HAS BEEN HACked!!!
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
» I suspect . . .
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: JGug1
» RE: ef President Bush - Top Ten
Posted by: Dak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: debmcd on Jul 1, 2008 2:03 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snideelf on Jul 1, 2008 2:17 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 1, 2008 2:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 1, 2008 2:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BA
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 1, 2008 3:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ba
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Jul 1, 2008 3:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marjani on Jul 1, 2008 3:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That's what you get in crackerjacks
Posted by: Moira61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rondolce on Jul 1, 2008 9:42 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Forgot?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pana on Jul 2, 2008 1:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you George Bush for being the UN-education president. We have had dumb presidents, but egads, George W. has to be the winner in this department and also the most evil one as well. Our nation is definitely at risk, ask the young people. They know, they are the victims.
Bush should have just stayed at home, dressed up, and played with his toys.
I can't believe the popular vote was against him and yet he became president for two terms. This is how broken the system is, and how evil and out of touch the politicos are. They don't care one hoot about the common person, plus they get the best perks, the best health care, and the best retirement while we suckers have to pay their way for the rest of our lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james_allen on Jul 2, 2008 1:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://fabpedigree.com/politic.htm
James
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FMABBI on Jul 2, 2008 2:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1.) First of all, we didn't elect Bush either time since both elections were stolen. We need a better system of voting. (Duh!) Why is this so hard?
2.) How can so few do so much damage? Where was Congress? Sadly, the Congress is an institution that has been purchased by BIG MONEY - much of it invested in the military industrial complex. If we can take BIG MONEY out of the political process, maybe we'll have politicians who actually represent the people who vote for them. We the citizens DEPEND on them to represent US (and not the corporations who fund their campaigns)!
3.) Amazingly, the events of 9-11 have yet to be investigated! Come on PEOPLE - are you really buying the "official story"? The 9-11 Commission funding of only $6m to investigate ($40m was spent to investigate "Whitewater"), two years after the fact and only because of the victims families' pressure - with the conclusions already accepted as "truth" - does NOT constitute a real investigation by any stretch of the imagination! Where did all the evidence go? Who benefited financially? What ABOUT Building Seven? Google "9-11 truth". This atrocity of the never ending "War on Terror" hinges on "9-11" so come on people, DEMAND a real investigation, properly funded, independent of politics. Don't you think that would be taxpayer money WELL SPENT??
4.) We need an educated electorate. The vast majority of voters do not know the basics of how our government is supposed to work. How many know and understand the Constitution/ Bill of Rights? Because of our collective lack of basic knowledge, we vote folks into office based on personality/ image. BIG MONEY buys ads and we the voters are so unaware that we believe anything the ad says. We need a much better informed citizenry and it starts with our public education K-12.
5.) The major news media outlets are complicit in all of the above. How do we fix? I do not know - but we need to put our heads together to figure this out. Our future freedom depends on it!
So you can't really blame the ignorant, lazy, fat, and spoiled American people - it's almost like we're nurtured from the beginning of life to be this way by our (purchased) government. Read 1984 again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thank you, FMABBI!
Posted by: DJC
Comments are closed-
Posted by: packofwolves on Jul 2, 2008 5:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marshallstax on Jul 2, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One (major) caveat: I'm working my way through a book called "Twilight War - The Folly of U.S. Space Dominance" by Mike Moore, which goes through the history of space exploration/exploitation and details the growing movement toward militarizing space - way beyond "Space Wars" - and serves as a decent backgrounder for anyone wanting to be informed about how the "space warriors" are trying to push NASA, and the Air Force, into a very different space program.
I absolutely do not support the militarization of space... that it's inevitable for war to move to space seems almost certain now and that's sad, but not really surprizing, given how all other horizions eventually get militarized. So, it's with mixed feelings that I have to grudgingly accept that still-president Bush gave that speech expressing support for continued exploration of space.
NASA needs better funding to operate... but it also needs the public to check in and stay on top of exactly what direction this country is going in space. People need to work to support the peaceful use of space and oppose space militarization.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Space not a waste...
Posted by: Dboy
» We need to fix what's wrong here first.
Posted by: DJC
» RE: We need to fix what's wrong here first.
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: well said
Posted by: Ghoulman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Musked on Jul 2, 2008 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have blackmail pictures of Pelosi in odd situations with little gremlins or little girls. Same with Harry Reid, he tap dances with Wide Stance Larry Craig in the John and they have proof. Only reason that can come to mind that someone as stupid as old wide eyes "deer in headlights" Pelosi would take impeachment "off the table" is that she snorts coke off the bellies of children and they have pictures of the act. She and Harry are traitors and in bed with the AIPAC, PNAC and Neocon triators. There is no reason for their inaction to bring justice to the guilty and punish those responsible for ruining this country. Why why why?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Yam on Jul 2, 2008 10:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/main.htm
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Musked on Jul 2, 2008 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metasailor on Jul 2, 2008 12:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has the quadrafecta: Bush lied to the US, Bush lied to his own party, the Bush administration threatened to fire an employee if he told Congress the truth, and the eventual cost is over a trillion.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unrelatedwaffle on Jul 2, 2008 1:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As though the poor in America's school system wasn't lousy enough to begin with.
This place is farked. I'm catching the next boat out before the whole building comes crashing down.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Jul 2, 2008 9:00 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Many of my friends are Republicans
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willd4change on Jul 3, 2008 6:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mercury613 on Jul 3, 2008 1:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jawsouth on Jul 4, 2008 9:21 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is simple, no matter what party affiliation you have and even if you like your representatives vote against all incumbents!!!!
Maybe then we would not have career politicians and the ones we elect might actually try to do something constructive for their alotted time in office. It would take out the good ol boy network and lessen the special interests groups impact. In fact we might find that spending millions of $$ to campaign won't make as much sense when they know re-election is not a possibility. It would sure make going to the polls easy and the guesswork out of marking your ballot. Let's face it, we all know that in our current situation that term limits will never be passed, so lets just do it ourselves. Unite against all incumbents!!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nopuppy on Jul 4, 2008 10:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joseph_b26 on Jul 5, 2008 1:27 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The power players running this war have a lot of nerve. We had the nerve to kill Iraq’s leader for genocide crimes that Saddam Hussein would also call a necessary evil. Almost on a daily bases, we have to get up and paint a new face of denial to hold back the Iraqi outrage, the world outrage and the American outrage for what we know is genocide. Yes, this lie requires daily maintenance, for without it, George Bush would be held for the same crimes he charged Saddam Hussein for.
A lie of this magnitude requires maintenance to keep it afloat. Condoleezza Rice is doing her part to make this terrible crime okay. No doubt, her conscience demands the same daily maintenance; she does not want to wake up to what she has supported. Would you?
Joseph
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlohaTerry on Jul 5, 2008 7:53 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The evidence was hastily melted down and destroyed, but as anyone can see, those Buildings were brought down by steel-cutting Thermite Charges!
The plan was called the Project for a New American Century...PNAC!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bright Penny on Jul 6, 2008 11:40 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 6, 2008 3:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress does NOT have the authority to second-guess this, nor does it have oversight. By subpeoning Gonzales to testify, Congress was doing an abuse of power.
Also, Abu Graib should have been number one, easily.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenPuker on Jul 8, 2008 1:37 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://freedocumentaries.org/
theatre.php?filmid=234&id=1157&wh=1000x720
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
MoveOn Launches Campaign for Bold Progressive Reforms as the Obama Era Begins
Obama's Promise of Change Comes Wrapped in Red, White and Blue
Reactions to Obama's Historic Moment From Around the Globe




